The present invention relates to steering control devices and more especially devices for use in preventing steering to the point of vehicle rollover.
Vehicle rollover—generally defined as vehicular accident in which a vehicle turns over on its side or roof—is an extremely dangerous form of a vehicle crash. Vehicle rollover accidents while relatively rare—estimated at approximately 3% of all vehicle crashes—account for a disproportionately high number of fatal crashes—estimated at approximately 31% of all fatal vehicle crashes. The Nation Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) reported that 10,666 people were killed in the US in vehicle rollover crashes in 2002. Many factors are involved in a vehicle rollover including for instance vehicle center of gravity, vehicle suspension stiffness, vehicle tire traction, etc. However, according to Wikipedia, “The main cause for rolling over is turning too sharply while moving too fast” (see Appendix A, page 1, first paragraph). While there may be several factors for a vehicle to be turned or steered beyond the vehicle threshold of roll such as driver hurry or impatience and driver inexperience, a well know cause for excessive turning or steering to the point of vehicle roll is the occurrence of an object such as a tumble weed or squirrel suddenly appearing in the drivers path (hereafter referred to Sudden Object Appearance or SOA). In such SOA, even the most experienced drivers can feel the inherent and immediate urge to rapidly turn the steering wheel. It is just such turning of the steering wheel that causes many vehicle rollovers.
In recent years, a system commonly referred to as Electronic Stability Control or ESC has, by automatically selectively apply torque or braking force to certain of a vehicles wheels, been used in significantly improving stability of vehicles, especially when such vehicles would have otherwise “spun out” or “fish-tailed” when cornering. However, such ESC systems, which typically require complex rollover prediction schemes, cannot prevent vehicle rollover when a vehicle steering wheel is turned too sharply for the vehicle speed as in a SOA situation. Further, a number of inventions dealing with vehicle steering control have been developed over the years. However, such inventions have typically merely dealt with preventing damage to a driving surface (i.e. turf) or prevention of a power steering system, and no such systems are known to prevent vehicle rollover, especially in a SOA situation. Examples of such inventions are provided in the following list of US patents and applications, the whole of which are incorporated herein by reference: U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,489,006, 6,584,388, 6,588,799, 6,714,848, 6,954,140, 7,107,136, 7,261,303, 7,325,644, 7,440,844, 7,613,555, 20030055549, 20030088349, 20030093201, 20040102894, 20040104066, 20040215384, 20050060069, 20050110227, 20060030991, 20060129298, 20060162987, 20070299583, 20080133101, 20090228173, 20100191423, and 20110060505.
The present invention is a vehicle rollover prevention apparatus. Thus unless indicated otherwise, where used in this application, the term “Anti-Roll Steering” or “ARS” shall be understood to mean a system or apparatus that adaptively adjusts the steering range of motion of a vehicle such as to prevent rollover of the vehicle. Thus for instance, ARS allows a vehicle steering to be steered in a full unrestricted range of motion when the vehicle is moving substantially below a predetermined speed (such as the speed that correlates to a roll threshold of the vehicle at a given turn angle or turn rate of the vehicle), but prevents a vehicle steering from being steered in a full unrestricted range of motion when the vehicle is moving at or near the predetermined speed. In a first embodiment, the apparatus defines an adaptive steering range limiting device (ASRLD) comprising a control unit and a pair of opposing unidirectional brake assemblies mounted to a steering column position detection disc (SCPDD). The unidirectional brake assemblies comprise a first left hand unidirectional brake assembly (LHUBA) and a second right hand unidirectional brake assembly (RHUBA), with the LHUBA operable to brake in a left hand or counterclockwise (CCW) direction and yet roll substantially freely in a right hand or clockwise (CW) direction, and with the RHUBA operable to brake in a right hand or clockwise (CW) direction and yet roll substantially freely in a left hand or counterclockwise (CCW) direction. The SCPDD includes at least one and preferably a plurality of sensors that sense the angular position of a vehicle steering wheel and provide such angular position information to the control unit. The control unit also receives speed data from a vehicle speed sensor. In practice, when a vehicle in which the ASRLD is installed is moving at less than a predetermined rate of speed, the unidirectional brake assemblies are not applied, and the vehicle steering wheel may be turned to the full hand range of steering motion. However, when a vehicle in which the ASRLD is installed is moving at no less than a predetermined rate of speed and the vehicle steering wheel is turned to no less than a predetermined left hand angle, the LHUBA is automatically applied, and the vehicle steering left hand range of motion is restricted such that the steering wheel may not be turned beyond the threshold of left hand rollover for the particular vehicle for the given vehicle speed. When the vehicle speed and/or steering wheel left hand angle is reduced, the LHUBA is automatically released. Further, when a vehicle in which the ASRLD is installed is moving at no less than a predetermined rate of speed and the vehicle steering wheel is turned to no less than a predetermined right hand angle, the RHUBA is automatically applied, and the vehicle steering right hand range of motion is restricted such that the steering wheel may not be turned beyond the threshold of right hand rollover for the particular vehicle for the given vehicle speed. When the vehicle speed and/or steering wheel right hand angle is reduced, the RHUBA is automatically released. It is noted that when the unidirectional brake assemblies are (separately) applied, although the steering wheel is prevented from being turn beyond a predetermined left hand or right hand angle, the steering wheel is free to be turned back toward a steering wheel centered or neutral position. In this method, a vehicle is prevented from being steered beyond the threshold of vehicle role and yet the vehicle steering wheel remains otherwise usable over the unrestrained rotational range of travel.
In order that the advantages of the invention will be readily understood, a more particular description of the invention briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments that are illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, the invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings, in which:
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” or similar language means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment,” “in an embodiment,” and similar language throughout this specification may, but do not necessarily, all refer to the same embodiment.
Furthermore, the described features, structures, or characteristics of the invention may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. In the following description, numerous specific details are included to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the invention. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, materials, and so forth. In other instances, well-known structures, materials, or operations are not shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of the invention.
In order to facilitate the understanding of the present invention in reviewing the drawings accompanying the specification, a feature table is provided below. It is noted that like features are like numbered throughout all of the figures.
Referring now to
ASRLD 10 is assembled such that steering column 30 is connected to steering wheel 20 on a first end of steering column 30 and to SCPDD 40 on a second end of steering column 30. Unidirectional brake assemblies 50 are positioned near SCPDD 40 such that disc 42 may rotatingly pass between rollers 64 and between rollers 74. Electronic control unit 80 is electronically connected to unidirectional brake assemblies 50 and electronically connected to sensor 85. ASRLD 10 is mounted in a vehicle such that second end of steering column 30 is steeringly connected to a rack and pinion or like steering mechanism of the vehicle such that ASRLD 10 is operable to steer the vehicle. Unidirectional brake assemblies 50 are further connected to a structural member of the vehicle such that unidirectional brake assemblies 50 remain stationary relative to a rotation movement of SCPDD 40 and such that unidirectional brake assemblies 50 are able to react or withstand a steering stopping load. Electronic control unit 80 is further connected to a structural member of the vehicle such that electronic control unit 80 remains stationary regardless of rotation movement of SCPDD 40. Sensor 85 is further connected to a structural member of the vehicle such that sensor 85 remains stationary relative to a rotation movement of SCPDD 40 and such that sensor 85 is able to detect magnetic targets 44 as magnetic targets 44 move into a near proximity position to sensor 85.
In practice, with ASRLD 10 operably mounted in a vehicle, when the vehicle is moving below a predetermined speed, for instance less than 10 miles per hour (mph), unidirectional brake assemblies 50 are not actuated as shown in
It is noted that ASRLD 10 is preferably adapted such that the various steering prevention thresholds are of substantially fine increments such that the braking of steering wheel 20 is accomplished in a fashion that approximates a smooth non-stair-stepped method. For example, if a vehicle equipped with ASRLD 10 were to be traveling on a substantially large flat horizontal paved surface at a high rate of speed, such as for instance 100 mph, and steering wheel 20 were to be turned hard to the right (or the left), ASRLD 10 would prevent steering wheel 20 from being turned to the right (or the left) to the point that the vehicle would rollover to the left (or to the right), and would more specifically, allow steering wheel 20 to be turned to the right (or the left) very near to but just less than the threshold of vehicle rollover. Further, in the above described scenario, if the right hand (or left hand) steering load were maintained on steering wheel 20 and the vehicle was to be allowed to decelerate, such as by coasting or by braking, the vehicle would turn to the right (or to the left) at an substantially continuously sharper right hand (or left hand) turn (e.g. a substantially decreasing turn radius) corresponding to the decreased rate of speed until the vehicle slowed to the point that it would be traveling at less than the first or slowest steering prevention threshold (such as less than 10 mph). Once the vehicle slowed to the first or slowest steering prevention threshold, the vehicle would then turn to the right (or to the left) at a constant turn rate which would be the full unrestricted turn rate of the vehicle. Thus by this description, it can be seen that at substantially any speed of the vehicle, the vehicle is allowed to turn at a rate approaching but just less than the vehicle rollover threshold for such given “any” speed. ASRLD 10 is somewhat analogous to “anti-lock braking”. With anti-lock braking, braking and vehicle control is maximized (breaking distance minimized) by allowing the brakes to apply a braking force that approaches but is never allowed to exceed the tire-to-ground traction breaking threshold. Analogously, with ASRLD 10, steering and vehicle control is maximized by allowing the vehicle to be steered to a degree that approaches but is never allowed to exceed the vehicle rollover threshold.
It is noted that each vehicle model or alteration thereof may have a different propensity for roll. In the first embodiment, such propensity is predetermined and corresponding combinations of turn degree and vehicle speed are determined for various vehicle rollover thresholds. However, it is also understood that vehicle roll propensity is influenced a plurality of factors. In addition to speed and turn degree, such factors may include for instance vehicle center of gravity, vehicle suspension stiffness, vehicle wheel base width, vehicle loading, vehicle tire pressure, traction between a road and the vehicle tires, road angle/banking, etc. Thus in a second embodiment, the second embodiment is substantially identical to the first embodiment except that in the second embodiment, factors in addition to vehicle speed and turn degree are monitored and rollover thresholds are determined on-the-fly. Further in the second embodiment, in order to prevent vehicle rollover due to continued or increased acceleration post-actuation of ASRLD 10, electronic control unit 80 is adapted such that whenever ASRLD 10 is actuated, electronic control unit 80 sends a signal to an accelerator control device such that a vehicle is prevented from further acceleration during the duration of ASRLD 10 actuation.
It is noted that inasmuch as there may be a belief by some that certain circumstances may exist wherein the likelihood of injury or death may be less if a vehicle is allowed to be steered beyond a vehicle threshold of rollover than if a vehicle is restricted from being steered beyond a vehicle threshold of rollover. To satisfy such potential concerns, in a third embodiment, the third embodiment is substantially identical to the second embodiment except that the third embodiment includes an override mode. In such override mode the steering rotational range of motion is automatically not restricted even if a steering prevention threshold is exceeded if an override logic criterion is satisfied. Such override logic criteria may comprise for instance, the detection of a human in near proximity of the drive path of the vehicle or for instance, the detection of a road surface having less than a predetermined coefficient of friction (e.g. an ice packed road).
Referring now to
ASRLD 110 is assembled such that steering column 130 is connected to steering wheel 120 on a first end of steering column 130 and to SCDD 140 on a second end of steering column 130. Electronic control unit 180 is electronically connected to actuator pins 144. ASRLD 110 is mounted in a vehicle such that second end of steering column 130 is steeringly connected to a rack and pinion or like steering mechanism of the vehicle such that ASRLD 110 is operable to steer the vehicle. Block 185 is connected to a structural member of the vehicle such that block 185 remains stationary relative to a rotation movement of SCDD 140 and such that block 185 is able to react or withstand a steering stopping load. Electronic control unit 180 is further connected to a structural member of the vehicle such that electronic control unit 180 remains stationary regardless of rotation movement of SCDD 140.
In practice, with ASRLD 110 operably mounted in a vehicle, when the vehicle is moving below a predetermined speed, for instance less than 5 miles per hour (mph), none of actuator pins 144 are actuated as shown in
It is noted that ASRLD 110 is preferably adapted such that the various steering prevention thresholds are of substantially fine increments such that the varying of steering range of motion of steering wheel 120 is accomplished in a fashion that approximates a smooth non-stair-stepped method. For example, if a vehicle equipped with ASRLD 110 were to be traveling on a substantially large flat horizontal paved surface at a high rate of speed, such as for instance 100 mph, and steering wheel 120 were to be turned hard to the right (or the left), ASRLD 110 would prevent steering wheel 120 from being turned to the right (or the left) to the point that the vehicle would rollover to the left (or to the right), and would more specifically, allow steering wheel 120 to be turned to the right (or the left) very near to but just less than the threshold of vehicle rollover. Further, in the above described scenario, if the right hand (or left hand) steering load were maintained on steering wheel 120 and the vehicle was to be allowed to decelerate, such as by coasting or by braking, the vehicle would turn to the right (or to the left) at an substantially continuously sharper right hand (or left hand) turn (e.g. a substantially decreasing turn radius) corresponding to the decreased rate of speed until the vehicle slowed to the point that it would be traveling at less than the first or slowest steering prevention threshold (such as less than 10 mph). Once the vehicle slowed to the first or slowest steering prevention threshold, the vehicle would then turn to the right (or to the left) at a constant turn rate which would be the full unrestricted turn rate of the vehicle. Thus by this description, it can be seen that at substantially any speed of the vehicle, the vehicle is allowed to turn at a rate approaching but just less than the vehicle rollover threshold for such given “any” speed. ASRLD 110 is somewhat analogous to “anti-lock braking”. With anti-lock braking, braking and vehicle control is maximized (breaking distance minimized) by allowing the brakes to apply a braking force that approaches but is never allowed to exceed the tire-to-ground traction breaking threshold. Analogously, with ASRLD 110, steering and vehicle control is maximized by allowing the vehicle to be steered to a degree that approaches but is never allowed to exceed the vehicle rollover threshold.
This nonprovisional utility patent application is a continuation of and claims the benefit under 35 USC § 120 to U.S. application Ser. No. 16/384,506 filed Apr. 15, 2019 and expected to issue as U.S. Pat. No. 11,077,877 on Aug. 3, 2021, which is a continuation of and claims the benefit under 35 USC § 120 to U.S. application Ser. No. 15/442,573 filed Feb. 24, 2017 and since issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,259,494 on Apr. 16, 2019, which is a continuation of and claims the benefit under 35 USC § 120 to U.S. application Ser. No. 14/733,042 filed Jun. 8, 2015 and since issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,580,103 on Feb. 28, 2017, which is a continuation of and claims the benefit under 35 USC § 120 to U.S. application Ser. No. 14/145,950 filed Jan. 1, 2014 and since issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,050,997 on Jun. 9, 2015, which is a continuation-in-part of and claims the benefit under 35 USC § 120 to co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 13/222,157 filed Aug. 31, 2011 and since issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,634,989 on Jan. 21, 2014, which claims the benefit under 35 USC § 119(e) of U.S. provisional application No. 61/378,482 filed Aug. 31, 2010 and of U.S. provisional application No. 61/385,535 filed Sep. 22, 2010, all of which are expressly incorporated herein in their entirety by this reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
RE24122 | Randol | Feb 1956 | E |
3805932 | Ernst et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
5022480 | Inagaki et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5189621 | Onari et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5489006 | Saiia et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5547055 | Chang et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5695021 | Schaffner et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5957983 | Tominaga | Sep 1999 | A |
6053270 | Nishikawa et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6170594 | Gilbert | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6304805 | Onogi | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6349247 | Schramm et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6540043 | Will | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6584388 | Schubert et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6588799 | Sanchez | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6714848 | Schubert et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6741922 | Holler | May 2004 | B2 |
6819980 | Bauer et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6938924 | Feldman et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6954140 | Holler | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7031816 | Lehmann et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7057503 | Watson | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7065442 | Sakata | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7077215 | Berkeley | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7107136 | Barta et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7132937 | Lu et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7237629 | Bland et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7261303 | Stefan et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7325644 | Sakai | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7369927 | Hille et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7440844 | Barta et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7493204 | Yano | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7580785 | Matsumoto et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7613555 | Takeda | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7630816 | Yasutake et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7756621 | Pillar et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7894955 | Milot | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7957866 | Oba et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8014922 | Le et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8050823 | Lee et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8083557 | Sullivan | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8315765 | Gerdes et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8489287 | Hsu et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8634989 | Schramm | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8641064 | Krajekian | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8718897 | Wright | May 2014 | B2 |
8798869 | Ohnuma et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8874320 | Barthomeuf | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8899601 | Mothfar | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8924116 | Yamada et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9050997 | Schramm | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9283825 | Mousa | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9469214 | Wright | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9580103 | Schramm | Feb 2017 | B2 |
20020195293 | Will | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030050741 | Bauer | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055549 | Barta et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030088349 | Schubert et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093201 | Schubert et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030182041 | Watson | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030225499 | Holler | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040041358 | Hrovat et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064246 | Lu et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040102894 | Holler | May 2004 | A1 |
20040104066 | Sakai | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040215384 | Kummel et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050012392 | Kato et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050060069 | Breed et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050082107 | Husain et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050087389 | Turner et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050110227 | Stefan et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131604 | Lu | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050216154 | Lehmann et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216155 | Kato et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222727 | Hille et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050252667 | Berkeley | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060030991 | Barta et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060064218 | Subbian et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074530 | Meyers et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060074534 | Geborek et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060129291 | Lu et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129298 | Takeda | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060162987 | Hagl | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060217860 | Ihara | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060265108 | Kieren et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070112498 | Yasutake et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070299583 | Fujita et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080082246 | Bolt et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086248 | Lu et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086251 | Lu et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097666 | Oba et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080109133 | Bedner et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114509 | Inoue et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114513 | Pillar et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133101 | Woywod et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080262686 | Kieren et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281487 | Milot | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090082923 | Gerdes et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090084616 | Kezobo et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090157262 | Lee et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090216409 | Lich et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090228173 | Bolio et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100191423 | Koyama et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100234175 | Hofler et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110010048 | Messih | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110060505 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120059550 | Maeda et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120173083 | Hsu et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185136 | Ohnuma et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120283923 | Yamada et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20140207320 | Wright | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150034407 | Guerster | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150142266 | Schramm | May 2015 | A1 |
20150239409 | Mousa | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150266503 | Schramm | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150353150 | Ursich et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20170166250 | Schramm | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20210197820 | Keller | Jul 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2304545 | Oct 2001 | CA |
202358164 | Aug 2012 | CN |
102007029958 | Jan 2009 | DE |
1046571 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1593583 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1914140 | Apr 2008 | EP |
1920994 | May 2008 | EP |
H06206553 | Jul 1994 | JP |
H08207820 | Aug 1996 | JP |
2007038928 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2008273318 | Nov 2008 | JP |
1019960018630 | Dec 1997 | KR |
20080113740 | Jun 2007 | KR |
20090000897 | Aug 2009 | KR |
2440259 | Jan 2012 | RU |
WO2006129862 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO2011143377 | Nov 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Gustafsson, Automotive safety systems, 2009, IEEE, p. 1-16 (Year: 2009). |
Dominguez-Garcia, et al. A backup system for automotive steer-by-wire, actuated by selective braking, 2004, IEEE, p. 383-388 (Year: 2004). |
Jonnas et al., Stabilization of Automotive Vehicles Using Active Steering and Adaptive Brake Control Allocation, 2009, IEEE, 345-558 (Year: 2009). |
Odenthal et al. Nonlinear steering and braking control for vehicle rollover avoidance, 1999, IEEE, 598-603 (Year: 1999). |
AB Dynamics, Autonomous Vehicle Testing by AB Dynamics, YouTube Website, Dec. 15, 2007, p. 1. |
AB Dynamics, Autonomous Vehicle Track Testing Systems, AB Dynamics Website, Date unknown, p. 1. |
Ackermann et al., Robust Steering Control for Active Rollover Avoidance of Vehicles with Elevated Center of Gravity, DLR, Jul. 1998, p. 1-6. |
Aso et al., Lateral State Prediction for Automated Steering using Reliability-Weighted Measurements from Multiple Sensors, IEEE ITSC, Sep. 30, 2007, pp. 2-7. |
Binda et al., Intelligent Prediction and Prevention of Vehicle Rollover Using NNLQG Regulator, Jan. 2015, IJEETC, p. 40-46. |
Carlson et al., Optimal Rollover Prevention with Steer by Wire and Differential Braking, Nov. 16, 2003, ASME, p. 1-10. |
Chen et al., Differential Braking Rollover Prevention, Nov. 2001, VSD, p. 359-389. |
Chen et al., Predictive Rollover Index, 2013, IEEE, p. 4123-4133. |
Chen et al., Vehicle Rollover Avoidance, 2010, IEEE, p. 70-85. |
Eisele et al., VDC Rollover Prevention Articulated Heavy Trucks, Aug. 22, 2000, AVEC, p. 1-8. |
Falcone et al., Predictive Active Steering Control for Autonomous Vehicles, IEEE, Jan. 2007, pp. 1-14. |
Jian et al., Real-Time Roll State Estimation, 2009, IEEE, p. 4387-4392. |
Kabir et al., Automated Planning, 2017, IEEE, vol. 14, No. 3, p. 1364-1377. |
Kidane et al., Development and Experimental Evaluation of a Tilt Stability Control System for Narrow Commuter Vehicles, IEEE, Nov. 2010, p. 1266-1279. |
Miller et al., Team Cornell's Skynet: Robust Perception and Planning in an Urban Environment, JOFR, Jun. 16, 2008, pp. 493-527. |
Odenthal et al., Nonlinear Steering and Braking Control for Vehicle Rollover Avoidance, DLR, Aug. 31, 1999, p. 1-6. |
Onieva et al., Autonomous car fuzzy control modeled by iterative genetic algorithms, 2009, IEEE, p. 1615-1620. |
Rajamani et al., New paradigms for the integration of yaw stability and rollover prevention functions in vehicle stability control, 2013, IEEE, p. 249-261. |
Richier et al., Rollover Prevention of ATV, 2013, IEEE, p. 1-6. |
Rieth et al., ESC II—ESC with Active Steering Intervention, SAE, Mar. 8, 2004, pp. 1-7. |
Schofield, Vehicle Dynamics Control for Rollover Prevention, Dec. 2006, LU, p. 1-109. |
Solmaz et al., A methodology for the design of robust rollover prevention controllers for automotive vehicle: Part 1—Differential braking, 2007, IEEE, pg. unknown. |
Solmaz et al., A methodology for the design of robust rollover prevention controllers for automotive vehicle: Part 2—Active steering, 2007, IEEE, p. 1606-1611. |
Stankiewicz et al., Open-Loop Vehicle Collision Avoidance, 2014, IEEE, p. 3207-3212. |
Tachibana et al., Toyota Automated Highway Vehicle System, Toyota Technical Review, vol. 43, No. 1, Sep. 1993, pp. 19-24. |
Tachibana et al., Automated Vehicle System Aligned with Infrastructure, Toyota Technical Review, vol. 45, No. 1, Sep. 1996, pp. 44-50. |
Tianjun et al., Rollover Prevention for Heavy Trucks, IEEE, 2009, p. 182-185. |
Yakub et al., Heavy Vehicle Stability and Rollover Prevention, IEEE, 2015, p. 16. |
Yim et al., Active Suspension and ESP for Rollover Prevention, Apr. 1, 2010, KAIST, p. 1-6. |
Yoon et al., Rollover Mitigation Control Scheme, 2006, IEEE. |
Yoon et al., Unified Chassis Control for Rollover Prevention and Lateral Stability, IEEE, Feb. 2009, vol. 58 No. 2. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61378482 | Aug 2010 | US | |
61385535 | Sep 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16384506 | Apr 2019 | US |
Child | 17391001 | US | |
Parent | 15442573 | Feb 2017 | US |
Child | 16384506 | US | |
Parent | 14733042 | Jun 2015 | US |
Child | 15442573 | US | |
Parent | 14145950 | Jan 2014 | US |
Child | 14733042 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13222157 | Aug 2011 | US |
Child | 14145950 | US |