Rollover prevention apparatus

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11565747
  • Patent Number
    11,565,747
  • Date Filed
    Sunday, August 1, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 31, 2023
    2 years ago
Abstract
The rollover prevention apparatus defines an adaptive steering range limiting device comprising a control unit and a pair of opposing unidirectional brake assemblies mounted to a steering column position detection disc. The rollover prevention apparatus prevents the steering wheel of the vehicle from being turned beyond the threshold of vehicle rollover, but otherwise does not restrict the rotational range of motion of the steering wheel of a vehicle.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to steering control devices and more especially devices for use in preventing steering to the point of vehicle rollover.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Vehicle rollover—generally defined as vehicular accident in which a vehicle turns over on its side or roof—is an extremely dangerous form of a vehicle crash. Vehicle rollover accidents while relatively rare—estimated at approximately 3% of all vehicle crashes—account for a disproportionately high number of fatal crashes—estimated at approximately 31% of all fatal vehicle crashes. The Nation Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) reported that 10,666 people were killed in the US in vehicle rollover crashes in 2002. Many factors are involved in a vehicle rollover including for instance vehicle center of gravity, vehicle suspension stiffness, vehicle tire traction, etc. However, according to Wikipedia, “The main cause for rolling over is turning too sharply while moving too fast” (see Appendix A, page 1, first paragraph). While there may be several factors for a vehicle to be turned or steered beyond the vehicle threshold of roll such as driver hurry or impatience and driver inexperience, a well know cause for excessive turning or steering to the point of vehicle roll is the occurrence of an object such as a tumble weed or squirrel suddenly appearing in the drivers path (hereafter referred to Sudden Object Appearance or SOA). In such SOA, even the most experienced drivers can feel the inherent and immediate urge to rapidly turn the steering wheel. It is just such turning of the steering wheel that causes many vehicle rollovers.


In recent years, a system commonly referred to as Electronic Stability Control or ESC has, by automatically selectively apply torque or braking force to certain of a vehicles wheels, been used in significantly improving stability of vehicles, especially when such vehicles would have otherwise “spun out” or “fish-tailed” when cornering. However, such ESC systems, which typically require complex rollover prediction schemes, cannot prevent vehicle rollover when a vehicle steering wheel is turned too sharply for the vehicle speed as in a SOA situation. Further, a number of inventions dealing with vehicle steering control have been developed over the years. However, such inventions have typically merely dealt with preventing damage to a driving surface (i.e. turf) or prevention of a power steering system, and no such systems are known to prevent vehicle rollover, especially in a SOA situation. Examples of such inventions are provided in the following list of US patents and applications, the whole of which are incorporated herein by reference: U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,489,006, 6,584,388, 6,588,799, 6,714,848, 6,954,140, 7,107,136, 7,261,303, 7,325,644, 7,440,844, 7,613,555, 20030055549, 20030088349, 20030093201, 20040102894, 20040104066, 20040215384, 20050060069, 20050110227, 20060030991, 20060129298, 20060162987, 20070299583, 20080133101, 20090228173, 20100191423, and 20110060505.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is a vehicle rollover prevention apparatus. Thus unless indicated otherwise, where used in this application, the term “Anti-Roll Steering” or “ARS” shall be understood to mean a system or apparatus that adaptively adjusts the steering range of motion of a vehicle such as to prevent rollover of the vehicle. Thus for instance, ARS allows a vehicle steering to be steered in a full unrestricted range of motion when the vehicle is moving substantially below a predetermined speed (such as the speed that correlates to a roll threshold of the vehicle at a given turn angle or turn rate of the vehicle), but prevents a vehicle steering from being steered in a full unrestricted range of motion when the vehicle is moving at or near the predetermined speed. In a first embodiment, the apparatus defines an adaptive steering range limiting device (ASRLD) comprising a control unit and a pair of opposing unidirectional brake assemblies mounted to a steering column position detection disc (SCPDD). The unidirectional brake assemblies comprise a first left hand unidirectional brake assembly (LHUBA) and a second right hand unidirectional brake assembly (RHUBA), with the LHUBA operable to brake in a left hand or counterclockwise (CCW) direction and yet roll substantially freely in a right hand or clockwise (CW) direction, and with the RHUBA operable to brake in a right hand or clockwise (CW) direction and yet roll substantially freely in a left hand or counterclockwise (CCW) direction. The SCPDD includes at least one and preferably a plurality of sensors that sense the angular position of a vehicle steering wheel and provide such angular position information to the control unit. The control unit also receives speed data from a vehicle speed sensor. In practice, when a vehicle in which the ASRLD is installed is moving at less than a predetermined rate of speed, the unidirectional brake assemblies are not applied, and the vehicle steering wheel may be turned to the full hand range of steering motion. However, when a vehicle in which the ASRLD is installed is moving at no less than a predetermined rate of speed and the vehicle steering wheel is turned to no less than a predetermined left hand angle, the LHUBA is automatically applied, and the vehicle steering left hand range of motion is restricted such that the steering wheel may not be turned beyond the threshold of left hand rollover for the particular vehicle for the given vehicle speed. When the vehicle speed and/or steering wheel left hand angle is reduced, the LHUBA is automatically released. Further, when a vehicle in which the ASRLD is installed is moving at no less than a predetermined rate of speed and the vehicle steering wheel is turned to no less than a predetermined right hand angle, the RHUBA is automatically applied, and the vehicle steering right hand range of motion is restricted such that the steering wheel may not be turned beyond the threshold of right hand rollover for the particular vehicle for the given vehicle speed. When the vehicle speed and/or steering wheel right hand angle is reduced, the RHUBA is automatically released. It is noted that when the unidirectional brake assemblies are (separately) applied, although the steering wheel is prevented from being turn beyond a predetermined left hand or right hand angle, the steering wheel is free to be turned back toward a steering wheel centered or neutral position. In this method, a vehicle is prevented from being steered beyond the threshold of vehicle role and yet the vehicle steering wheel remains otherwise usable over the unrestrained rotational range of travel.





DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

In order that the advantages of the invention will be readily understood, a more particular description of the invention briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments that are illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, the invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 is a trimetric view of a first embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 2 is an orthographic cross-sectional view of the first embodiment of the invention taken substantially at the location indicated by the cross-section arrows annotated with “2” in FIG. 1;



FIG. 3A is an orthographic cross-sectional view of the first embodiment of the invention taken substantially at the location indicated by the cross-section arrows annotated with “3” in FIG. 2, the invention is shown with the LHUBA in an unactuated or open position;



FIG. 3B is an orthographic cross-sectional view of the first embodiment of the invention taken substantially at the location indicated by the cross-section arrows annotated with “3” in FIG. 2, the invention is shown with the LHUBA in an actuated or closed position;



FIG. 4A is an orthographic cross-sectional view of the first embodiment of the invention taken substantially at the location indicated by the cross-section arrows annotated with “4” in FIG. 2, the invention is shown with the RHUBA in an unactuated or open position;



FIG. 4B is an orthographic cross-sectional view of the first embodiment of the invention taken substantially at the location indicated by the cross-section arrows annotated with “4” in FIG. 2, the invention is shown with the RHUBA in an actuated or closed position;



FIG. 5 is a trimetric view of a fourth embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 6A is an orthographic cross-sectional view of the fourth embodiment of the invention taken substantially at the location indicated by the cross-section arrows annotated with “6” in FIG. 5;



FIG. 6B is substantially similar to FIG. 6A except that a first set of actuator pins are shown as extended;



FIG. 6C is substantially similar to FIG. 6A except that a second set of actuator pins are shown as extended;



FIG. 6D is substantially similar to FIG. 6A except that a third set of actuator pins are shown as extended;



FIG. 6E is substantially similar to FIG. 6D except that SCDD 140 is shown rotated to the limit of its right hand rotational range of motion;



FIG. 7 is an orthographic cross-sectional view of the fourth embodiment of the invention taken substantially at the location indicated by the cross-section arrows annotated with “7” in FIG. 6D, with the invention shown without an actuation pin 144 blocking rotational motion of SCDD 140, and;



FIG. 7A is an orthographic cross-sectional view of the fourth embodiment of the invention taken substantially at the location indicated by the cross-section arrows annotated with “7” in FIG. 6E, with the invention shown with an actuation pin 144a blocking rotational motion of SCDD 140.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” or similar language means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment,” “in an embodiment,” and similar language throughout this specification may, but do not necessarily, all refer to the same embodiment.


Furthermore, the described features, structures, or characteristics of the invention may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. In the following description, numerous specific details are included to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the invention. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, materials, and so forth. In other instances, well-known structures, materials, or operations are not shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of the invention.


In order to facilitate the understanding of the present invention in reviewing the drawings accompanying the specification, a feature table is provided below. It is noted that like features are like numbered throughout all of the figures.












FEATURE TABLE










#
Feature







10
adaptive steering range limiting device



20
steering wheel



30
steering column



40
steering column position detection disc



42
disc



44
magnetic target



50
unidirectional brake assemblies



60
left hand unidirectional brake assembly



62
caliper housing



64
unidirectional roller



70
right hand unidirectional brake assembly



72
caliper housing



74
unidirectional roller



80
electronic control unit



85
sensor



92
left hand or CCW direction indication arrow



94
right hand or CW direction indication arrow



110 
adaptive steering range limiting device



120 
steering wheel



130 
steering column



140 
steering column disc device



142 
disc



144 
actuator pin



144a
actuator pin-extended



180 
electronic control unit



185 
block



192 
left hand or CCW direction indication arrow



194 
right hand or CW direction indication arrow










Referring now to FIGS. 1 through 4 of the drawings, a first embodiment of the invention is an adaptive steering range limiting device (ASRLD) 10 comprising a steering wheel 20, a steering column 30, a steering column position detection disc (SCPDD) 40, a pair of opposing unidirectional brake assemblies 50, an electronic control unit 80 and a sensor 85. Furthermore arrow 92 defines a left hand or counterclockwise (CCW) direction indication arrow and arrow 94 defines a right hand or clockwise (CW) direction indication arrow. Steering wheel 20 defines a conventional steering wheel as may commonly be found in a commercially available passenger vehicle. Steering column 30 defines a conventional steering column that serves to transmit steering torque from steering wheel 20 to a rack and pinion or other such vehicle wheel control device. SCPDD 40 defines a substantially thin preferably aluminum cylinder shaped disc 42 having a plurality of magnetic targets 44 embedded within disc 42 and spaced substantially equally about the periphery of disc 42. Unidirectional brake assemblies 50 define an assembly comprising a left hand unidirectional brake assembly (LHUBA) 60 and a right hand unidirectional brake assembly (RHUBA) 70. LHUBA 60 defines a brake assembly having a caliper housing 62, and a plurality of actuatable or extendable and retractable unidirectional rollers 64. Unidirectional roller 64 preferably comprises a generally hard rubber roller mounted on at least one unidirectional bearing. Unidirectional bearings are well known in the art and are for instance taught in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,805,932 and 5,547,055, which are incorporated herein by reference. RHUBA 70 defines a brake assembly having a caliper housing 72, and a plurality of actuatable or extendable and retractable unidirectional rollers 74. Unidirectional roller 74 preferably comprises a generally hard rubber roller mounted on at least one unidirectional bearing. Electronic control unit 80 defines an electronic control unit such as are commonly in use in automobiles, and is adapted to electronically receive speed, position and other sensor input and is adapted to electronically transmit actuation signals based on predetermined inputs. Sensor 85 preferably defines an electronic sensor such as reed switch type sensor that is operable to detect near proximity to magnetic targets 44, and thus is operable to detect rotational positioning of SCPDD 40.


ASRLD 10 is assembled such that steering column 30 is connected to steering wheel 20 on a first end of steering column 30 and to SCPDD 40 on a second end of steering column 30. Unidirectional brake assemblies 50 are positioned near SCPDD 40 such that disc 42 may rotatingly pass between rollers 64 and between rollers 74. Electronic control unit 80 is electronically connected to unidirectional brake assemblies 50 and electronically connected to sensor 85. ASRLD 10 is mounted in a vehicle such that second end of steering column 30 is steeringly connected to a rack and pinion or like steering mechanism of the vehicle such that ASRLD 10 is operable to steer the vehicle. Unidirectional brake assemblies 50 are further connected to a structural member of the vehicle such that unidirectional brake assemblies 50 remain stationary relative to a rotation movement of SCPDD 40 and such that unidirectional brake assemblies 50 are able to react or withstand a steering stopping load. Electronic control unit 80 is further connected to a structural member of the vehicle such that electronic control unit 80 remains stationary regardless of rotation movement of SCPDD 40. Sensor 85 is further connected to a structural member of the vehicle such that sensor 85 remains stationary relative to a rotation movement of SCPDD 40 and such that sensor 85 is able to detect magnetic targets 44 as magnetic targets 44 move into a near proximity position to sensor 85.


In practice, with ASRLD 10 operably mounted in a vehicle, when the vehicle is moving below a predetermined speed, for instance less than 10 miles per hour (mph), unidirectional brake assemblies 50 are not actuated as shown in FIGS. 3A and 4A, and steering wheel 20 may be freely rotated through its the full rotational range of motion. It is noted that when steering wheel 20 is rotated, SCPDD 40 correspondingly rotates between rollers 64 and between rollers 74 and sensor 85 and electronic control unit 80 monitors the rotational orientation of SCPDD 40. However, when the vehicle is moving at or above a predetermined speed, for instance 10 miles per hour (mph), and SCPDD 40 is sensed at being at or above a left hand rotational orientation of greater than a predetermined amount, for instance 10 degrees CCW from a center or neutral steering position, electronic control unit 80 determines a steering prevention threshold has been achieved and sends an actuation signal to LHUBA 60, and LHUBA 60 actuates by moving unidirectional rollers 64 into unidirectional braking contact with SCPDD 40 as shown in FIG. 3B and steering wheel 20 is prevented from rotating further in a left hand or CCW direction but is free to rotate in a right hand or CW direction. When the vehicle slows to less than the predetermined speed or when steering wheel 20 is rotated to a rotational orientation of below the predetermined amount, LHUBA 60 “deactuates” by moving unidirectional rollers 64 out of braking contact with SCPDD 40 as shown in FIG. 3A, and steering wheel 20 may again be rotated freely in both directions (CCW and CW) unless and until another steering prevention threshold is reached. Further, when the vehicle is moving at or above a predetermined speed, for instance 10 miles per hour (mph), and SCPDD 40 is sensed at being at or above a right hand rotational orientation of greater than a predetermined amount, for instance 10 degrees CW from a center or neutral steering position, electronic control unit 80 determines a steering prevention threshold has been achieved and sends an actuation signal to RHUBA 70, and RHUBA 70 actuates by moving unidirectional rollers 74 into unidirectional braking contact with SCPDD 40 as shown in FIG. 4B and steering wheel 20 is prevented from rotating further in a right hand or CW direction but is free to rotate in a left hand or CCW direction. When the vehicle slows to less than the predetermined speed or when steering wheel 20 is rotated to a rotational orientation of below the predetermined amount, RHUBA 70 “deactuates” by moving unidirectional rollers 74 out of braking contact with SCPDD 40 as shown in FIG. 4A, and steering wheel 20 may again be rotated freely in both directions (CCW and CW) unless and until another steering prevention threshold is reached.


It is noted that ASRLD 10 is preferably adapted such that the various steering prevention thresholds are of substantially fine increments such that the braking of steering wheel 20 is accomplished in a fashion that approximates a smooth non-stair-stepped method. For example, if a vehicle equipped with ASRLD 10 were to be traveling on a substantially large flat horizontal paved surface at a high rate of speed, such as for instance 100 mph, and steering wheel 20 were to be turned hard to the right (or the left), ASRLD 10 would prevent steering wheel 20 from being turned to the right (or the left) to the point that the vehicle would rollover to the left (or to the right), and would more specifically, allow steering wheel 20 to be turned to the right (or the left) very near to but just less than the threshold of vehicle rollover. Further, in the above described scenario, if the right hand (or left hand) steering load were maintained on steering wheel 20 and the vehicle was to be allowed to decelerate, such as by coasting or by braking, the vehicle would turn to the right (or to the left) at an substantially continuously sharper right hand (or left hand) turn (e.g. a substantially decreasing turn radius) corresponding to the decreased rate of speed until the vehicle slowed to the point that it would be traveling at less than the first or slowest steering prevention threshold (such as less than 10 mph). Once the vehicle slowed to the first or slowest steering prevention threshold, the vehicle would then turn to the right (or to the left) at a constant turn rate which would be the full unrestricted turn rate of the vehicle. Thus by this description, it can be seen that at substantially any speed of the vehicle, the vehicle is allowed to turn at a rate approaching but just less than the vehicle rollover threshold for such given “any” speed. ASRLD 10 is somewhat analogous to “anti-lock braking”. With anti-lock braking, braking and vehicle control is maximized (breaking distance minimized) by allowing the brakes to apply a braking force that approaches but is never allowed to exceed the tire-to-ground traction breaking threshold. Analogously, with ASRLD 10, steering and vehicle control is maximized by allowing the vehicle to be steered to a degree that approaches but is never allowed to exceed the vehicle rollover threshold.


It is noted that each vehicle model or alteration thereof may have a different propensity for roll. In the first embodiment, such propensity is predetermined and corresponding combinations of turn degree and vehicle speed are determined for various vehicle rollover thresholds. However, it is also understood that vehicle roll propensity is influenced a plurality of factors. In addition to speed and turn degree, such factors may include for instance vehicle center of gravity, vehicle suspension stiffness, vehicle wheel base width, vehicle loading, vehicle tire pressure, traction between a road and the vehicle tires, road angle/banking, etc. Thus in a second embodiment, the second embodiment is substantially identical to the first embodiment except that in the second embodiment, factors in addition to vehicle speed and turn degree are monitored and rollover thresholds are determined on-the-fly. Further in the second embodiment, in order to prevent vehicle rollover due to continued or increased acceleration post-actuation of ASRLD 10, electronic control unit 80 is adapted such that whenever ASRLD 10 is actuated, electronic control unit 80 sends a signal to an accelerator control device such that a vehicle is prevented from further acceleration during the duration of ASRLD 10 actuation.


It is noted that inasmuch as there may be a belief by some that certain circumstances may exist wherein the likelihood of injury or death may be less if a vehicle is allowed to be steered beyond a vehicle threshold of rollover than if a vehicle is restricted from being steered beyond a vehicle threshold of rollover. To satisfy such potential concerns, in a third embodiment, the third embodiment is substantially identical to the second embodiment except that the third embodiment includes an override mode. In such override mode the steering rotational range of motion is automatically not restricted even if a steering prevention threshold is exceeded if an override logic criterion is satisfied. Such override logic criteria may comprise for instance, the detection of a human in near proximity of the drive path of the vehicle or for instance, the detection of a road surface having less than a predetermined coefficient of friction (e.g. an ice packed road).


Referring now to FIGS. 5 through 7 of the drawings, a fourth embodiment of the invention is an adaptive steering range limiting device (ASRLD) 110 comprising a steering wheel 120, a steering column 130, a steering column disc device (SCDD) 140, an electronic control unit 180 and a block 185. Furthermore arrow 192 defines a left hand or counterclockwise (CCW) direction indication arrow and arrow 194 defines a right hand or clockwise (CW) direction indication arrow. Steering wheel 120 defines a conventional steering wheel as may commonly be found in a commercially available passenger vehicle. Steering column 130 defines a conventional steering column that serves to transmit steering torque from steering wheel 120 to a rack and pinion or other such vehicle wheel control device. SCDD 140 defines a substantially thin preferably aluminum cylinder shaped disc 142 having a plurality of actuator pins 144 affixed to disc 142 and spaced substantially equally about the periphery of disc 142. Actuator pins 144 are mounted to disc 142 such that in an un-actuated or retracted position, actuator pins 144 are positioned substantially flush with disc 142 and such that in an actuated or extended position, actuator pins 144 are positioned substantially in a position so as to potentially interfere with block 185. Electronic control unit 80 defines an electronic control unit such as are commonly in use in automobiles, and is adapted to electronically receive speed input and is adapted to electronically transmit actuation signals based on predetermined inputs. Block 185 preferably defines rigidly fixed preferably metallic block that is connect to a vehicle structural member and does not move with disc 142.


ASRLD 110 is assembled such that steering column 130 is connected to steering wheel 120 on a first end of steering column 130 and to SCDD 140 on a second end of steering column 130. Electronic control unit 180 is electronically connected to actuator pins 144. ASRLD 110 is mounted in a vehicle such that second end of steering column 130 is steeringly connected to a rack and pinion or like steering mechanism of the vehicle such that ASRLD 110 is operable to steer the vehicle. Block 185 is connected to a structural member of the vehicle such that block 185 remains stationary relative to a rotation movement of SCDD 140 and such that block 185 is able to react or withstand a steering stopping load. Electronic control unit 180 is further connected to a structural member of the vehicle such that electronic control unit 180 remains stationary regardless of rotation movement of SCDD 140.


In practice, with ASRLD 110 operably mounted in a vehicle, when the vehicle is moving below a predetermined speed, for instance less than 5 miles per hour (mph), none of actuator pins 144 are actuated as shown in FIGS. 6A and 6, and steering wheel 120 may be freely rotated through its the full (unrestricted) rotational range of motion. It is noted that when steering wheel 120 is rotated, SCDD 140 correspondingly in very near proximity to stationary block 185. However, when the vehicle is moving at or above a first predetermined speed, for instance 10 miles per hour (mph), electronic control unit 80 determines a first steering prevention threshold has been achieved and sends an actuation signal to a first set of actuator pins 144 as shown in FIG. 6B and steering wheel 120 is prevented from rotating beyond a first restricted range of rotational motion. When the vehicle is moving at or above a second predetermined speed, for instance 35 miles per hour (mph), electronic control unit 80 determines a second steering prevention threshold has been achieved and sends an actuation signal to a second set of actuator pins 144 as shown in FIG. 6C and steering wheel 120 is prevented from rotating beyond a second restricted range of rotational motion. When the vehicle is moving at or above a third predetermined speed, for instance 65 miles per hour (mph), electronic control unit 80 determines a third steering prevention threshold has been achieved and sends an actuation signal to a third set of actuator pins 144 as shown in FIG. 6D and steering wheel 120 is prevented from rotating beyond a third restricted range of rotational motion. When the vehicle slows to less than a given predetermined speed threshold, or when a more restrictive set of actuator pins 144 are actuated or extended, electronic control unit 80 sends an retraction signal to a given set of actuator pins 144, and actuator pins 144 “deactuate” or retract and return to their home position, steering wheel 120 may again be rotated freely in both directions (CCW and CW) unless and until another steering prevention threshold is reached. It is noted that in the fourth embodiment of the invention, in contrast to systems that react to initiation of vehicle rollover. ASRLD 110 functions in a “proactive” mode by preventing the vehicle from initiating a rollover.


It is noted that ASRLD 110 is preferably adapted such that the various steering prevention thresholds are of substantially fine increments such that the varying of steering range of motion of steering wheel 120 is accomplished in a fashion that approximates a smooth non-stair-stepped method. For example, if a vehicle equipped with ASRLD 110 were to be traveling on a substantially large flat horizontal paved surface at a high rate of speed, such as for instance 100 mph, and steering wheel 120 were to be turned hard to the right (or the left), ASRLD 110 would prevent steering wheel 120 from being turned to the right (or the left) to the point that the vehicle would rollover to the left (or to the right), and would more specifically, allow steering wheel 120 to be turned to the right (or the left) very near to but just less than the threshold of vehicle rollover. Further, in the above described scenario, if the right hand (or left hand) steering load were maintained on steering wheel 120 and the vehicle was to be allowed to decelerate, such as by coasting or by braking, the vehicle would turn to the right (or to the left) at an substantially continuously sharper right hand (or left hand) turn (e.g. a substantially decreasing turn radius) corresponding to the decreased rate of speed until the vehicle slowed to the point that it would be traveling at less than the first or slowest steering prevention threshold (such as less than 10 mph). Once the vehicle slowed to the first or slowest steering prevention threshold, the vehicle would then turn to the right (or to the left) at a constant turn rate which would be the full unrestricted turn rate of the vehicle. Thus by this description, it can be seen that at substantially any speed of the vehicle, the vehicle is allowed to turn at a rate approaching but just less than the vehicle rollover threshold for such given “any” speed. ASRLD 110 is somewhat analogous to “anti-lock braking”. With anti-lock braking, braking and vehicle control is maximized (breaking distance minimized) by allowing the brakes to apply a braking force that approaches but is never allowed to exceed the tire-to-ground traction breaking threshold. Analogously, with ASRLD 110, steering and vehicle control is maximized by allowing the vehicle to be steered to a degree that approaches but is never allowed to exceed the vehicle rollover threshold.

Claims
  • 1. An anti-roll steering apparatus having: a steering wheel in operative communication with a set of guide wheels of an automobile such that rotation of said steering wheel causes a corresponding change in the angular position of said guide wheels relative to the body of said automobile,at least one sensor adapted to sense the magnitude of at least one driving parameter comprising at least one of automobile speed, degree of steering turn, automobile center of gravity, automobile suspension stiffness, automobile wheelbase width, automobile loading, automobile tire pressure, traction between a road and automobile tires, and road bank angle,at least one actuator operatively adapted to actuate upon receipt of an actuation signal, andan electronic control unit adapted to send an actuation signal to said actuator when a sensed driving parameter exceeds a predetermined magnitude,wherein said apparatus has a first mode that allows said automobile to be steered within a maximal non-rollover steering range of motion of said automobile but prevents said automobile from being steered beyond a rollover threshold of said automobile at any rollover capable speed of said automobile regardless of an oversteer rotational load being applied to said steering wheel and regardless of the source of said oversteer rotational load, andwherein said apparatus has a second mode that allows said automobile to be steered within a maximal non-rollover steering range of motion of said automobile but does not prevent said automobile from being steered beyond a rollover threshold of said automobile, andwherein said apparatus transitions from said first mode to said second mode in response to an application of a non-oversteer-rotational load to said steering wheel, andwherein if said guide wheels are turned beyond an angular position point of a rollover threshold of said automobile, said automobile will roll over.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said automobile comprises a non-autonomously steered automobile, and wherein said source of said oversteer rotational load comprises a human applied oversteer rotational load source.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said apparatus is automatically actuated in response to the speed of said automobile.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said actuation signal is sent by said electronic control unit when a combination of sensed automobile speed and degree of steering turn approach a rollover threshold of said automobile.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said application of a non-oversteer-rotational load to said steering wheel defines an application of load to said steering wheel such that said steering wheel is rotated to a rotational orientation of below a steering prevention threshold.
  • 6. An anti-roll steering apparatus having: a steering device in operative communication with at least one guide wheel of a vehicle such that rotation of said a steering device causes a corresponding change in the angular position of said at least one guide wheel relative to the body of said vehicle,at least one sensor adapted to sense the magnitude of at least one driving parameter,at least one actuator operatively adapted to actuate upon receipt of an actuation signal, andan electronic control unit adapted to send an actuation signal to said actuator when a sensed driving parameter exceeds a predetermined magnitude,wherein said apparatus has a first mode that allows said vehicle to be steered within a non-rollover steering range of motion of said vehicle but prevents said vehicle from being steered beyond a rollover threshold of said vehicle at any rollover capable speed of said vehicle regardless of an oversteer load being applied to said a steering device and regardless of the source of said oversteer load, andwherein said apparatus has a second mode that allows said vehicle to be steered within a non-rollover steering range of motion of said vehicle but does not prevent said vehicle from being steered beyond a rollover threshold of said vehicle, andwherein said apparatus transitions from said first mode to said second mode in response to an application of a non-oversteer load to said steering device.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein said vehicle comprises a non-autonomously steered vehicle, and wherein said source of said oversteer load comprises a human applied oversteer load source.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein said apparatus is automatically actuated in response to the speed of said vehicle, and wherein if said at least one guide wheel is turned beyond an angular position point of a rollover threshold of said vehicle, said vehicle will roll over.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein said steering device defines a steering wheel.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein said at least one sensor is adapted to sense the magnitude of at least one driving parameter comprising vehicle speed, degree of steering turn, vehicle center of gravity, vehicle suspension stiffness, vehicle wheelbase width, vehicle loading, vehicle tire pressure, traction between a road and vehicle tires, and road bank angle.
  • 11. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein said actuation signal is sent by said electronic control unit when a combination of sensed vehicle speed and degree of steering turn approach a rollover threshold of said vehicle.
  • 12. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein said application of a non-oversteer load to said steering device defines an application of load to said steering device such that said steering device is adjusted to an orientation of below a steering prevention threshold.
  • 13. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein said input to said steering device defines an application of load to said steering device such that said steering device is adjusted to an orientation of below a steering prevention threshold.
  • 14. An anti-roll steering apparatus having: a steering device in operative communication with at least one guide wheel of a vehicle,at least one sensor,at least one actuator, andan electronic control unit,wherein said apparatus has a mode that allows said vehicle to be steered within a non-rollover steering range of motion of said vehicle but prevents said vehicle from being steered to a point of vehicle roll regardless of an oversteer load being applied to said steering device and regardless of the source of said oversteer load, andwherein said apparatus transitions from said mode in response to an input to said steering device.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein said vehicle comprises a non-autonomously steered vehicle, and wherein said source of said oversteer load comprises a human applied oversteer load source, and wherein said input to said steering device comprises a non-oversteer load applied to said steering device.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein said apparatus is automatically actuated in response to the speed of said vehicle, and wherein if said vehicle is steered beyond a rollover threshold of said vehicle, said vehicle will roll over.
  • 17. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein said steering device defines a steering wheel.
  • 18. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein said at least one sensor is adapted to sense the magnitude of at least one driving parameter comprising vehicle speed, degree of steering turn, vehicle center of gravity, vehicle suspension stiffness, vehicle wheelbase width, vehicle loading, vehicle tire pressure, traction between a road and vehicle tires, and road bank angle.
  • 19. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein said actuation signal is sent by said electronic control unit when a combination of sensed vehicle speed and degree of steering turn approach a rollover threshold of said vehicle.
  • 20. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein said apparatus has a first mode and a second mode, and wherein when said apparatus is in said first mode, said apparatus allows said vehicle to be steered within a non-rollover steering range of motion of said vehicle but prevents said vehicle from being steered beyond a rollover threshold of said vehicle, wherein when said apparatus is in said second mode, said apparatus allows said vehicle to be steered within a non-rollover steering range of motion of said vehicle but does not prevent said vehicle from being steered beyond a rollover threshold of said vehicle, and wherein said apparatus automatically performs at least one of a transition from said first mode to said second mode and a transition from said second mode to said first mode.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This nonprovisional utility patent application is a continuation of and claims the benefit under 35 USC § 120 to U.S. application Ser. No. 16/384,506 filed Apr. 15, 2019 and expected to issue as U.S. Pat. No. 11,077,877 on Aug. 3, 2021, which is a continuation of and claims the benefit under 35 USC § 120 to U.S. application Ser. No. 15/442,573 filed Feb. 24, 2017 and since issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,259,494 on Apr. 16, 2019, which is a continuation of and claims the benefit under 35 USC § 120 to U.S. application Ser. No. 14/733,042 filed Jun. 8, 2015 and since issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,580,103 on Feb. 28, 2017, which is a continuation of and claims the benefit under 35 USC § 120 to U.S. application Ser. No. 14/145,950 filed Jan. 1, 2014 and since issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,050,997 on Jun. 9, 2015, which is a continuation-in-part of and claims the benefit under 35 USC § 120 to co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 13/222,157 filed Aug. 31, 2011 and since issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,634,989 on Jan. 21, 2014, which claims the benefit under 35 USC § 119(e) of U.S. provisional application No. 61/378,482 filed Aug. 31, 2010 and of U.S. provisional application No. 61/385,535 filed Sep. 22, 2010, all of which are expressly incorporated herein in their entirety by this reference.

US Referenced Citations (118)
Number Name Date Kind
RE24122 Randol Feb 1956 E
3805932 Ernst et al. Apr 1974 A
5022480 Inagaki et al. Jun 1991 A
5189621 Onari et al. Feb 1993 A
5489006 Saiia et al. Feb 1996 A
5547055 Chang et al. Aug 1996 A
5695021 Schaffner et al. Dec 1997 A
5957983 Tominaga Sep 1999 A
6053270 Nishikawa et al. Apr 2000 A
6170594 Gilbert Jan 2001 B1
6304805 Onogi Oct 2001 B1
6349247 Schramm et al. Feb 2002 B1
6540043 Will Apr 2003 B2
6584388 Schubert et al. Jun 2003 B2
6588799 Sanchez Jul 2003 B1
6714848 Schubert et al. Mar 2004 B2
6741922 Holler May 2004 B2
6819980 Bauer et al. Nov 2004 B2
6938924 Feldman et al. Sep 2005 B2
6954140 Holler Oct 2005 B2
7031816 Lehmann et al. Apr 2006 B2
7057503 Watson Jun 2006 B2
7065442 Sakata Jun 2006 B2
7077215 Berkeley Jul 2006 B2
7107136 Barta et al. Sep 2006 B2
7132937 Lu et al. Nov 2006 B2
7237629 Bland et al. Jul 2007 B1
7261303 Stefan et al. Aug 2007 B2
7325644 Sakai Feb 2008 B2
7369927 Hille et al. May 2008 B2
7440844 Barta et al. Oct 2008 B2
7493204 Yano Feb 2009 B2
7580785 Matsumoto et al. Aug 2009 B2
7613555 Takeda Nov 2009 B2
7630816 Yasutake et al. Dec 2009 B2
7756621 Pillar et al. Jul 2010 B2
7894955 Milot Feb 2011 B2
7957866 Oba et al. Jun 2011 B2
8014922 Le et al. Sep 2011 B2
8050823 Lee et al. Nov 2011 B2
8083557 Sullivan Dec 2011 B2
8315765 Gerdes et al. Nov 2012 B2
8489287 Hsu et al. Jul 2013 B2
8634989 Schramm Jan 2014 B1
8641064 Krajekian Feb 2014 B2
8718897 Wright May 2014 B2
8798869 Ohnuma et al. Aug 2014 B2
8874320 Barthomeuf Oct 2014 B2
8899601 Mothfar Dec 2014 B1
8924116 Yamada et al. Dec 2014 B2
9050997 Schramm Jun 2015 B1
9283825 Mousa Mar 2016 B2
9469214 Wright Oct 2016 B2
9580103 Schramm Feb 2017 B2
20020195293 Will Dec 2002 A1
20030050741 Bauer Mar 2003 A1
20030055549 Barta et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030088349 Schubert et al. May 2003 A1
20030093201 Schubert et al. May 2003 A1
20030182041 Watson Sep 2003 A1
20030225499 Holler Dec 2003 A1
20040041358 Hrovat et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040064246 Lu et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040102894 Holler May 2004 A1
20040104066 Sakai Jun 2004 A1
20040215384 Kummel et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050012392 Kato et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050060069 Breed et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050082107 Husain et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050087389 Turner et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050110227 Stefan et al. May 2005 A1
20050131604 Lu Jun 2005 A1
20050216154 Lehmann et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216155 Kato et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050222727 Hille et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050252667 Berkeley Nov 2005 A1
20060030991 Barta et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060064218 Subbian et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060074530 Meyers et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060074534 Geborek et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060129291 Lu et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060129298 Takeda Jun 2006 A1
20060162987 Hagl Jul 2006 A1
20060217860 Ihara Sep 2006 A1
20060265108 Kieren et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070112498 Yasutake et al. May 2007 A1
20070299583 Fujita et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080082246 Bolt et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080086248 Lu et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080086251 Lu et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080097666 Oba et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080109133 Bedner et al. May 2008 A1
20080114509 Inoue et al. May 2008 A1
20080114513 Pillar et al. May 2008 A1
20080133101 Woywod et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080262686 Kieren et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080281487 Milot Nov 2008 A1
20090082923 Gerdes et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090084616 Kezobo et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090157262 Lee et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090216409 Lich et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090228173 Bolio et al. Sep 2009 A1
20100191423 Koyama et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100234175 Hofler et al. Sep 2010 A1
20110010048 Messih Jan 2011 A1
20110060505 Suzuki et al. Mar 2011 A1
20120059550 Maeda et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120173083 Hsu et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120185136 Ohnuma et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120283923 Yamada et al. Nov 2012 A1
20140207320 Wright Jul 2014 A1
20150034407 Guerster Feb 2015 A1
20150142266 Schramm May 2015 A1
20150239409 Mousa Aug 2015 A1
20150266503 Schramm Sep 2015 A1
20150353150 Ursich et al. Dec 2015 A1
20170166250 Schramm Jun 2017 A1
20210197820 Keller Jul 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (17)
Number Date Country
2304545 Oct 2001 CA
202358164 Aug 2012 CN
102007029958 Jan 2009 DE
1046571 Oct 2000 EP
1593583 Nov 2005 EP
1914140 Apr 2008 EP
1920994 May 2008 EP
H06206553 Jul 1994 JP
H08207820 Aug 1996 JP
2007038928 Aug 2005 JP
2008273318 Nov 2008 JP
1019960018630 Dec 1997 KR
20080113740 Jun 2007 KR
20090000897 Aug 2009 KR
2440259 Jan 2012 RU
WO2006129862 Aug 2006 WO
WO2011143377 Nov 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (35)
Entry
Gustafsson, Automotive safety systems, 2009, IEEE, p. 1-16 (Year: 2009).
Dominguez-Garcia, et al. A backup system for automotive steer-by-wire, actuated by selective braking, 2004, IEEE, p. 383-388 (Year: 2004).
Jonnas et al., Stabilization of Automotive Vehicles Using Active Steering and Adaptive Brake Control Allocation, 2009, IEEE, 345-558 (Year: 2009).
Odenthal et al. Nonlinear steering and braking control for vehicle rollover avoidance, 1999, IEEE, 598-603 (Year: 1999).
AB Dynamics, Autonomous Vehicle Testing by AB Dynamics, YouTube Website, Dec. 15, 2007, p. 1.
AB Dynamics, Autonomous Vehicle Track Testing Systems, AB Dynamics Website, Date unknown, p. 1.
Ackermann et al., Robust Steering Control for Active Rollover Avoidance of Vehicles with Elevated Center of Gravity, DLR, Jul. 1998, p. 1-6.
Aso et al., Lateral State Prediction for Automated Steering using Reliability-Weighted Measurements from Multiple Sensors, IEEE ITSC, Sep. 30, 2007, pp. 2-7.
Binda et al., Intelligent Prediction and Prevention of Vehicle Rollover Using NNLQG Regulator, Jan. 2015, IJEETC, p. 40-46.
Carlson et al., Optimal Rollover Prevention with Steer by Wire and Differential Braking, Nov. 16, 2003, ASME, p. 1-10.
Chen et al., Differential Braking Rollover Prevention, Nov. 2001, VSD, p. 359-389.
Chen et al., Predictive Rollover Index, 2013, IEEE, p. 4123-4133.
Chen et al., Vehicle Rollover Avoidance, 2010, IEEE, p. 70-85.
Eisele et al., VDC Rollover Prevention Articulated Heavy Trucks, Aug. 22, 2000, AVEC, p. 1-8.
Falcone et al., Predictive Active Steering Control for Autonomous Vehicles, IEEE, Jan. 2007, pp. 1-14.
Jian et al., Real-Time Roll State Estimation, 2009, IEEE, p. 4387-4392.
Kabir et al., Automated Planning, 2017, IEEE, vol. 14, No. 3, p. 1364-1377.
Kidane et al., Development and Experimental Evaluation of a Tilt Stability Control System for Narrow Commuter Vehicles, IEEE, Nov. 2010, p. 1266-1279.
Miller et al., Team Cornell's Skynet: Robust Perception and Planning in an Urban Environment, JOFR, Jun. 16, 2008, pp. 493-527.
Odenthal et al., Nonlinear Steering and Braking Control for Vehicle Rollover Avoidance, DLR, Aug. 31, 1999, p. 1-6.
Onieva et al., Autonomous car fuzzy control modeled by iterative genetic algorithms, 2009, IEEE, p. 1615-1620.
Rajamani et al., New paradigms for the integration of yaw stability and rollover prevention functions in vehicle stability control, 2013, IEEE, p. 249-261.
Richier et al., Rollover Prevention of ATV, 2013, IEEE, p. 1-6.
Rieth et al., ESC II—ESC with Active Steering Intervention, SAE, Mar. 8, 2004, pp. 1-7.
Schofield, Vehicle Dynamics Control for Rollover Prevention, Dec. 2006, LU, p. 1-109.
Solmaz et al., A methodology for the design of robust rollover prevention controllers for automotive vehicle: Part 1—Differential braking, 2007, IEEE, pg. unknown.
Solmaz et al., A methodology for the design of robust rollover prevention controllers for automotive vehicle: Part 2—Active steering, 2007, IEEE, p. 1606-1611.
Stankiewicz et al., Open-Loop Vehicle Collision Avoidance, 2014, IEEE, p. 3207-3212.
Tachibana et al., Toyota Automated Highway Vehicle System, Toyota Technical Review, vol. 43, No. 1, Sep. 1993, pp. 19-24.
Tachibana et al., Automated Vehicle System Aligned with Infrastructure, Toyota Technical Review, vol. 45, No. 1, Sep. 1996, pp. 44-50.
Tianjun et al., Rollover Prevention for Heavy Trucks, IEEE, 2009, p. 182-185.
Yakub et al., Heavy Vehicle Stability and Rollover Prevention, IEEE, 2015, p. 16.
Yim et al., Active Suspension and ESP for Rollover Prevention, Apr. 1, 2010, KAIST, p. 1-6.
Yoon et al., Rollover Mitigation Control Scheme, 2006, IEEE.
Yoon et al., Unified Chassis Control for Rollover Prevention and Lateral Stability, IEEE, Feb. 2009, vol. 58 No. 2.
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
61378482 Aug 2010 US
61385535 Sep 2010 US
Continuations (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 16384506 Apr 2019 US
Child 17391001 US
Parent 15442573 Feb 2017 US
Child 16384506 US
Parent 14733042 Jun 2015 US
Child 15442573 US
Parent 14145950 Jan 2014 US
Child 14733042 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13222157 Aug 2011 US
Child 14145950 US