Non-Applicable.
1. Field of Invention
This invention relates to an aerodynamic means that mitigate wind generated vortices and uplift loads on the roof perimeter area of a building, in a simple, effective, and economical way, applicable for both new constructions and retrofits of existing buildings.
2. Discussion of Prior Art
Current roof construction practices normally result in a roof perimeter configuration that tends to generate strong edge vortex and subjects the roof perimeter area to severe uplift and high risk of wind damage. Structural methods have been traditionally used to counter the severe uplift force and mitigate the risk of wind damage, while few aerodynamic methods have been recommended to reduce the uplift force. Banks et. al. described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,601,348 (2003) various types of wind spoilers supported above the roof plane to mitigate roof edge vortex. However, the apparatus is rather complicated in shape and structure, and is susceptible to wind damage itself because the raised structure subjects itself to accelerated airflow across the roof edge. In U.S. Pat. No. 4,005,557 (1977), Kramer et. al. described designs for a roof wind spoiler system claimed to be used near roof corners. The limited breadth of the apparatus impedes its effectiveness and causes higher wind loads on the adjacent segments of a roof perimeter where the apparatus does not extend. Ponder disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,918,423 (1999) a wind spoiler ridge cap that is designed for roof ridges. The roof edge structure disclosed herein utilizes edge serration and face perforation to disrupt vortex formation, and is continuous along a roof perimeter or at least substantially extends from the roof corners towards the middle part of a roof edge. While the examples illustrated in this application are primarily for flat roofs, the conception and spirit herein demonstrated is suitable for both sloped and flat roofs. U.S. Pat. No. 5,414,965 (1995) of Kelley et. al. includes a drain-through gravel stop with limited face perforation for rainwater drainage, but the porosity is far from sufficient for airflow, and it does not provide edge serration, to effectively suppress roof edge vortex.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,606,828 (2003) of this applicant et al., a series of roof edge configurations are recommended for use to mitigate vortex and high uplift in flat-roof perimeter areas, where the concept is one of coordinated exterior curvature design for a roof edge system. The present invention discloses a distinct roof edge apparatus that utilizes roof perimeter plates having face perforation and/or edge serration, which disrupt and mitigate roof edge vortices and thus reduce uplift force and wind scouring on a roof.
This invention discloses an aerodynamic means that mitigate wind generated vortices and uplift loads on the roof perimeter area of a building, in a simple, effective, and economical way, applicable for both new constructions and retrofits of existing buildings. This is achieved by using an elongated plate-like device generally having face perforation and/or edge serration and being appropriately mounted along roof perimeters. The face perforation provides air permeability facilitating a pressure equalization effect while the edge serration provides a non-straight, zigzag, edge shape leading to a flow-disorganizing effect, each of which increases small-scale turbulence entrainment, prevents or interrupts the vortex from formation along a roof perimeter. Such a roof edge device is generally referred to as roof edge vortex suppressor in this application. The specific configurations exemplified herein pertinent to this invention are primarily for perimeters of flat or low-slope roofs, while the spirit and principles of the present invention are applicable for both sloped and flat roofs. It is prudent that modifications be made according to the demonstrated concepts and principles when other types of roofs or roof edge constructions are encountered.
Several Objects and Advantages of the Present Invention are:
Further objects or advantages are to provide roof edge devices which protect a roof perimeter from wind and rain damage, and which are still among the simplest, most effective and reliable, and inexpensive to manufacture and convenient to install. These and still further objects and advantages will become apparent from a consideration of the ensuing description and drawings.
The specific layout, number, shapes and sizes of the distributed perforation-holes are not of primary significance, as long as the overall porosity resulting from the face perforation is sufficiently large to provide desired air-permeability. Similarly, while deeper serration or indentation are generally preferred by using larger sizes for the projections and notches of the zigzag edge, their specific layout, number and shapes are not of critical significance. Triangular, rectangular, trapezoidal, semi-circular and semi-elliptic shapes etc., for example, are all permissible without compromising the functionality described herein. It is also allowable that the perforations, projections and notches have different shapes and sizes in the same vortex suppressor assembly. The choices may be made in combination with aesthetic considerations.
A roof edge vortex suppressor may be mounted on and secured to a roof edge with any appropriate means that does not negatively affect its functionality. In this example, the vortex suppressor 10 extends downwardly in parallel with wall surface 201, and bends back upwardly and then inwardly to conform to the wall surface 201 and roof plane 200, forming a mounting base 18 for the device being secured to the roof perimeter with fasteners 210. The method to mount and secure the vortex-suppressing device to the roof perimeter as illustrated herein is merely an example, with many alternative common methods being possible, and ought not to limit the scope of this invention. Roof membrane 202, insulation material 204, substrate 206 and wood nailer 208, being examples of common roof components, are included in the drawings herein merely to illustrate their relationships with the vortex suppressor that is the subject matter of this invention.
Utilization of both edge serration and face perforation is generally preferred; however, use of only edge serration or face perforation is also allowable. As an example, the embodiment illustrated in
A edge vortex suppressor described herein provides protection against wind and rain damage for a flat roof when the apparatus and its geometric relationship with the roof perimeter are configured in accordance with the spirit of this invention, as exemplified herein in the specification and governed in the appended claims. The examples given in this application are merely for the purpose of describing the invention and should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention or the applicable variations of configuration according to the spirit of this invention. It is emphasized that the geometric elements for edge serration or face perforation need not to have the same shapes or a strictly regular spatial pattern as those illustrated herein. Many other shapes such as triangles, rectangles and trapezoids, arranged in various patterns, can also be used for forming serrated edges and/or perforated faces according to the spirit of the invention disclosed in this application without compromising the function of the vortex suppressor.
Installation and Operation
An embodiment of this invention is a passive flow control device for roof edges. Once configured and installed properly, it stays functioning in such a way that it mitigates vortex formation at a roof edge and reduces uplifts and wind scouring on the roof, whenever the wind blows towards a building bearing atop such roof edge devices, and requires no active operational intervention.
Conclusion, Ramifications, and Scope
It is apparent that roof edge vortex suppressors of this invention provide advantageous devices for mitigating roof edge vortex and roof uplift, and are still among the simplest, most effective and reliable, inexpensive to manufacture and convenient to install, with little, if any, maintenance requirement.
Compared to the prior art, the present invention provides a unique one-piece, self-supported, substantially simpler and stronger structure that can be conveniently fastened to the roof edge with superior stability, while at the same time ensures a key function of suppressing roof edge vortex. In addition, this present invention also provides a function of being an effective roof gravel stop and an aesthetic edge termination fascia.
Although the description above contains many specifications, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention but as merely providing illustrations of some of the presently preferred embodiments of this invention. Various changes, modifications, variations can be made therein without departing from the spirit of the invention. Roof edge vortex suppressors can be made of any reasonably durable material with any appropriate means of fabrication as long as a configuration according to the spirit of this invention is accomplished to support the described working mechanism and to provide the associated functionality. Any appropriate conventional or new mounting method can be used to secure a roof edge vortex suppressor to a roof perimeter without departing from the spirit of this invention. Thus the scope of the invention should be determined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents, rather than by the examples given.
This application is a divisional of U.S. application No. 11/236,394, filed Sep. 24, 2005 (now U.S. Patent No. 7,866,095), which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/613,354, filed Sept. 27, 2004. The disclosure of prior U.S. application Ser. No. 11/236,394 is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
168446 | Blodget | Oct 1875 | A |
191603 | Lauckhardt | Jun 1877 | A |
224520 | Dougherty | Feb 1880 | A |
262125 | Rogers | Aug 1882 | A |
338917 | Bloomer | Mar 1886 | A |
390061 | Bower | Sep 1888 | A |
417270 | Nelson | Dec 1889 | A |
431463 | Hewitt | Jul 1890 | A |
440104 | Gaylord | Nov 1890 | A |
464036 | Nelson | Dec 1891 | A |
D22832 | Bryant | Oct 1893 | S |
507776 | Berger et al. | Oct 1893 | A |
511701 | Jacobs | Dec 1893 | A |
595295 | Fox et al. | Dec 1897 | A |
633622 | Souther | Sep 1899 | A |
701376 | Noel | Jun 1902 | A |
706684 | Peter | Aug 1902 | A |
849984 | Dougherty | Apr 1907 | A |
934329 | Martin et al. | Sep 1909 | A |
952549 | Taylor | Mar 1910 | A |
974722 | Swanson | Nov 1910 | A |
1085474 | Peterson | Jan 1914 | A |
1576656 | Honsinger | Mar 1926 | A |
1863561 | Brinker et al. | Jun 1932 | A |
1878126 | Gates | Sep 1932 | A |
2021929 | Voigt | Nov 1935 | A |
2206040 | Ludington | Jul 1940 | A |
2258803 | Peles | Oct 1941 | A |
2270537 | Ludington | Jan 1942 | A |
2270538 | Ludington | Jan 1942 | A |
2304593 | Peles | Dec 1942 | A |
2306080 | Julius | Dec 1942 | A |
2621617 | Piatt | Dec 1952 | A |
2905114 | Olson | Sep 1959 | A |
2938243 | Peles | May 1960 | A |
2968128 | Pelican | Jan 1961 | A |
3133321 | Hine | May 1964 | A |
3280524 | Hull | Oct 1966 | A |
3282000 | Shaw et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
3289361 | Holliday | Dec 1966 | A |
3583113 | Winski | Jun 1971 | A |
3717968 | Olsen et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
3742668 | Oliver | Jul 1973 | A |
3969850 | Hirai | Jul 1976 | A |
4005557 | Kramer et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4193583 | Witt | Mar 1980 | A |
4233786 | Hildreth | Nov 1980 | A |
4269008 | Assouline | May 1981 | A |
4461129 | von Platen | Jul 1984 | A |
4665667 | Taylor et al. | May 1987 | A |
4830315 | Presz et al. | May 1989 | A |
4832316 | Mincher | May 1989 | A |
4957037 | Tubbesing et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5167099 | Nelson | Dec 1992 | A |
5272846 | Kelley et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
D343014 | Covini | Jan 1994 | S |
5321921 | Holt | Jun 1994 | A |
5414965 | Kelley et al. | May 1995 | A |
D361138 | Moore et al. | Aug 1995 | S |
5522185 | Cline | Jun 1996 | A |
5724776 | Meadows, Jr. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735035 | Holt | Apr 1998 | A |
5813179 | Koenig, Jr. et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5918423 | Ponder | Jul 1999 | A |
6044601 | Chmela et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6128865 | Din | Oct 2000 | A |
6202372 | Powell | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212836 | Larson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6256934 | Alley | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6283064 | Djukastein et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298608 | Alley | Oct 2001 | B1 |
D451204 | Schlichting et al. | Nov 2001 | S |
6314685 | Sullivan | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6318028 | Alley | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6357184 | Alley | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360504 | Webb et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6453623 | Nelson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6539675 | Gile | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6601348 | Banks et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6606828 | Lin et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607168 | Cordier et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6786015 | Wilt | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6877282 | Melsen et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6928768 | Snow | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6941706 | Austin et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7020995 | Snow | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7137224 | Rasmussen et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7174677 | Dressler | Feb 2007 | B1 |
D544612 | Cochrane | Jun 2007 | S |
7451571 | Allen | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7451572 | Inzeo et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7487618 | Lin | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7823335 | Lin | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7827740 | Lin | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7836642 | Lin | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20010027625 | Webb | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020050104 | Reeves et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020073633 | Schlichting et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083666 | Webb et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020124485 | Pulte | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030005649 | Austin | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20050210759 | Austin et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060016130 | Lin | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060248810 | Ewing | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070113489 | Kaiser et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080005985 | Lin | Jan 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
620961 | Dec 1980 | CH |
4006864 | Oct 1991 | DE |
198 48 263 | May 1999 | DE |
2-49805 | Feb 1990 | JP |
5-133141 | May 1993 | JP |
6-185243 | Jul 1994 | JP |
6-185244 | Jul 1994 | JP |
06200589 | Jul 1994 | JP |
6-288019 | Oct 1994 | JP |
6-288050 | Oct 1994 | JP |
6-288120 | Oct 1994 | JP |
6-307122 | Nov 1994 | JP |
6-336860 | Dec 1994 | JP |
8-49448 | Feb 1995 | JP |
7-158318 | Jun 1995 | JP |
8-218683 | Aug 1996 | JP |
11336276 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2000-8326 | Jan 2000 | JP |
WO 8600950 | Feb 1986 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110083378 A1 | Apr 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60613354 | Sep 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11236394 | Sep 2005 | US |
Child | 12974746 | US |