Non-Applicable.
1. Field of Invention
This invention relates to an aerodynamic means that mitigate wind generated vortices and uplift loads on the roof perimeter area of a building, in a simple, effective, and economical way, applicable for both new constructions and retrofits of existing buildings.
2. Discussion of Prior Art
The previous and present roof construction practices normally lead to a roof perimeter configuration that tends to generate corner-edge vortex and subjects the roof perimeter area to severe uplift and high risk of wind damage. Structural methods have been used to mitigate the risk of wind damage. For example, builders may use stronger fasteners or smaller spacing between fasteners for roof cover and deck in the roof edge and corner area, and use “hurricane straps” in lieu of toenails to tie down the roof framing to the wall structure. Some aerodynamic methods have been recommended. Banks et. al. described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,601,348 (2003) various types of wind spoilers raised above the roof plane that function to mitigate edge vortex formation. However, the apparatus is rather complicated in shape and structure, and is susceptible to wind damage itself because the raised structure subjects itself to accelerated airflow across the roof edge. In U.S. Pat. No. 4,005,557 (1977), Kramer et. al. described conceptual designs for a roof wind spoiler system used strictly near roof corners. The limited breadth of the apparatus impedes its effectiveness and causes higher wind loads along the neighboring segments of roof perimeter, which the apparatus does not extend to. Its design is also only suitable for flat roofs. Ponder disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,918,423 (1999) a wind spoiler ridge cap that is designed for protecting roof ridges, while this present invention deals primarily with roof perimeters. The structure disclosed herein is continuous along a roof edge or at least substantially extends from the roof corners towards the middle part of a roof edge. The designs are suitable for both sloped and flat roofs. The examples given hereafter are particularly suitable for roofs that have roof cover extending outwardly beyond the roof deck boundary and subjecting itself to accelerated upward flow deflected by the wall directly below.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,606,828 of this applicant et al., a series of roof edge configurations are recommended for use to mitigate vortex and high uplift in flat-roof perimeter areas, where the concept is one of coordinated exterior curvature design for a roof edge system. The present invention discloses a distinct roof edge apparatus that utilizes overhung plates that preferably have face perforation and/or outer edge serration.
This invention discloses an aerodynamic means that mitigate wind generated vortices and uplift loads on the roof perimeter area of a building, in a simple, effective, and economical way, applicable for both new constructions and retrofits of existing buildings. This is achieved by using an elongated device generally having an angle-like cross-section and being attached along a roof edge. The elongated device, which can be formed from sheet materials, is generally positioned in such a way that the open side of the angle faces outwardly and downwardly, with one side of the angle generally vertical and the other side generally horizontal. The generally vertical side is normally attached to an existing fascia or bargeboard, while the generally horizontal side extends and overhangs outwardly. The overhung portion is preferably made air-permeable and/or has a zigzag outer edge. The permeability provides a pressure equalizing effect while the outer edge serration provides a flow disorganizing effect, each of which prevents or interrupts the vortex from formation along a roof perimeter. Such a roof edge device is generally referred to as roof edge windscreen in this application. The specific configurations recommended herein pertinent to this invention are primarily applicable for edges of gable, hip, gambrel, mono-slope and flat roofs where no perimeter draining device, such as gutter, or edge flashing is installed. It is prudent that modifications be made according to the spirit and principles of the present invention when other types of roofs or roof edge constructions are encountered.
Accordingly, several objects and advantages of the present invention are:
to provide roof edge devices which shield roof edge details from upward airflow, wind-driven rain and wind pressure;
to provide roof edge devices which suppress edge vortex formation and reduce wind loads on roofing materials, roof decks and framing in the roof perimeter areas;
to provide roof edge devices which reduce wind uplift loads generally on a building structure that are transferred from the roof;
to provide roof edge devices which reduce vortex scouring of roofing materials, such as asphalt shingles, roofing tiles, paver etc, and prevent them from becoming wind-borne missiles injuring people and damaging adjacent building envelopes during severe wind events;
to provide roof edge devices which stabilize wind flow over the roof and minimize cyclic loads on roof components resulting from recurring winds, reducing the chances of damage due to material fatigue;
to provide roof edge devices which prevent rainwater from being driven sideward and upward by wind turbulence and pressed through the gaps between roofing material and roof deck, and into the inner space of the roof assembly, during wind/rain events;
to provide roof edge devices which possess the desired aerodynamic performance while maintaining an aesthetic and waterproofing functionality under both extreme and recurring weather conditions.
Further objects or advantages are to provide roof edge devices which protect a roof edge from wind and rain damage, and which are still among the simplest, most effective and reliable, and inexpensive to manufacture and convenient to install. These and still further objects and advantages will become apparent from a consideration of the ensuing description and drawings.
A roof edge windscreen is generally an elongated assembly that is disposed longitudinally in parallel with, and attached to, a roof edge.
The roof edge windscreen 110, exemplified here as made of sheet material, consists of a screen portion 111, an intermediate channel portion formed by segments 113a and 113b, and lower mounting portions 115a and 115b, along with an optional drip edge 117, adjoining consecutively. As exemplified in
Herein the perforation 112 is made with a plurality of through-holes on the sheet material. The specific layout, number, shapes and sizes of the distributed through-holes are not of primary significance, as long as the overall porosity resulting from the face perforation is in a preferred range approximately between 25% and 75% to provide desired air-permeability. This helps equalizing pressures on the opposite sides of the screen and suppresses the forcing mechanism for vortex formation along the edge. In
Thus the function of face perforation and edge serration is to disrupt the formation of the roof edge vortex that would otherwise cause severe uplift loads and scouring on the roof surface.As illustrated in FIGS. lA and 1B, the screen portion 111 is disposed with its inner side in close proximity to the outer edge 19 of the roof covering 11 and is extended generally outwardly. Various modifications to the configuration of the screen portion 111 shown in FIGS. lA and 1B are permissible. For example, as illustrated in
The intermediate channel portion is formed by a generally vertical segment 113a and a generally inward and upward extending segment 113b that adjoin the screen portion 111 and the mounting portion 115a respectively, as illustrated in each of the preceding figures. The channel portion formed by segments 113a and 113b serves as both a draining device and a protection from upward flow and pressure for the underside of the overhung portion 18 of the roof covering 11. Optional draining holes (not shown) can be used near the lower edge of the channel portion where segments 113a and 113b meet.
The roof edge windscreen 110 may be mounted on and secured to a roof edge with any appropriate means that does not negatively affect the functionality of the screen portion 111 or that of the intermediate channel portion formed by 113a and 113b described herein. A simple example is already illustrated in the preceding figures, i.e.
The roof edge windscreen has at least three functions. The first is to suppress vortex over a roof edge. High uplifts and strong scouring that result from wind-induced edge vortex above the roof, are prime causes for wind damage to roof components. Secondly, it shields the underside of the protruding portion 18 of the roof covering 11, such as an array of asphalt shingles or wood shakes, from upward flow and pressure that tend to peel the roof covering 11 upwards and away from other parts of the roof edge assembly 10. The third function is to prevent upward flow-driven rain from being pressured into the roof structure through the unsealed gaps between the roof covering 11 and the roof components beneath it.
A roof edge windscreen provides protection against wind and rain damage for a broad variety of roof constructions whenever the apparatus and its geometric relationship with the roof perimeter are configured in accordance with the spirit of this invention, as exemplified herein in the specification and governed in the appended claims.
Installation and Operation
An embodiment of this invention is a passive flow control device for roof edges. Once installed properly, it stays functioning in such a way that it mitigates vortex formation at a roof edge and reduces uplifts and vortex scouring on the roof perimeter area, whenever the wind blows towards a building bearing atop such roof edge devices, and requires no active operational intervention.
It is apparent that roof edge windscreens of this invention provide advantageous devices for mitigating roof edge vortex and roof uplift, and are still among the simplest, most effective and reliable, inexpensive to manufacture and convenient to install.
Although the description above contains many specifications, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention but as merely providing illustrations of some of the presently preferred embodiments of this invention. Various changes, modifications, variations can be made therein without departing from the spirit of the invention. Roof edge windscreens can be made of any reasonably durable material with any appropriate means of fabrication as long as a configuration according to the spirit of this invention is accomplished to support the described working mechanism and to provide the associated functionality. Various surface portions of a roof edge windscreen may also bear such surface details as corrugation or steps of adequate sizes, as opposed to perfectly smooth surfaces. Any appropriate conventional or new mounting method can be used to secure a roof edge windscreen to a roof perimeter without departing from the spirit of this invention. Thus the scope of the invention should be determined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents, rather than by the examples given.
This application is entitled to the benefit of Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/591,164, filed 2004 Jul. 26.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
417270 | Nelson | Dec 1889 | A |
1878126 | Gates | Sep 1932 | A |
2021929 | Voigt | Nov 1935 | A |
2206040 | Ludington | Jul 1940 | A |
2270537 | Ludington | Jan 1942 | A |
2270538 | Ludington | Jan 1942 | A |
2905114 | Olson | Sep 1959 | A |
3280524 | Hull | Oct 1966 | A |
3717968 | Olsen et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
3742668 | Oliver | Jul 1973 | A |
3969850 | Hirai | Jul 1976 | A |
4005557 | Kramer et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4233786 | Hildreth | Nov 1980 | A |
4461129 | von Platen | Jul 1984 | A |
4830315 | Presz et al. | May 1989 | A |
5050489 | Mankowski | Sep 1991 | A |
5414965 | Kelley et al. | May 1995 | A |
D361138 | Moore et al. | Aug 1995 | S |
5813179 | Koenig, Jr. et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5918423 | Ponder | Jul 1999 | A |
6044601 | Chmela et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6128865 | Din | Oct 2000 | A |
6212836 | Larson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6360504 | Webb et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6539675 | Gild | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6601348 | Banks et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6606828 | Lin et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6786015 | Wilt | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7137224 | Rasmussen et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7451571 | Allen | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7451572 | Inzeo et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7487618 | Lin | Feb 2009 | B2 |
20020124485 | Pulte | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20050210759 | Austin et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060248810 | Ewing | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070113489 | Kaiser et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2-49805 | Feb 1990 | JP |
5-133141 | May 1993 | JP |
6-185243 | Jul 1994 | JP |
6-185244 | Jul 1994 | JP |
6-288019 | Oct 1994 | JP |
6-288050 | Oct 1994 | JP |
6-288120 | Oct 1994 | JP |
6-307122 | Nov 1994 | JP |
6-336860 | Dec 1994 | JP |
7-158318 | Jun 1995 | JP |
8-49448 | Feb 1996 | JP |
8-218683 | Aug 1996 | JP |
2000-8326 | Jan 2000 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060016130 A1 | Jan 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60591164 | Jul 2004 | US |