1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to safety systems for construction. More particularly, the present invention relates to a roof perimeter cable guard system that provides a safety guard rail and line system for installation on roofs.
2. Description of the Related Art
The use of safety guardrail systems for installation around the perimeter of a roof during construction and roof repair is widely practiced. Such a system protects workers from accidental falls from a roof and the injuries thereby incurred. Most systems include a number of posts or uprights affixed to the roof and configured to support railings of framing lumber and the like, such as 1″×4″ or 2″×4″ lumber. The use of lumber results in a necessarily heavy installation due to the inherent weight of the lumber, thereby exposing workers to risk and substantial effort in installing and removing the lumber and supporting uprights. Of course, metal or plastic rails could be substituted, but they would also suffer due to inherent weight and difficulty in handling safety rails.
The use of uprights or stanchions to support wire rope or other cable as barrier lines in place of lumber is known. However, stanchion designs are limited in adapting to various forms of roof perimeters, such as parapet and overhang, and require a stanchion of substantial strength and resulting weight to support the cables under tension. It would be desirable to provide a stanchion system that provides for easy installation on a variety of roof perimeter designs that is light in weight while providing adequate strength to support the cable barrier lines under necessary tension.
Thus, a roof perimeter cable guard system solving the aforementioned problems is desired.
The roof perimeter cable guard system of the present invention provides a substantially vertical stanchion member supported at its lower end by an anchor bracket screwed to the outer edge of the roof perimeter feature to which it attaches. A main brace member extends outward and downward from the upper end portion of the main stanchion member and curves around and under the roof perimeter feature. The lower portion of the main brace has a sleeve for receiving an adjustable wall-engaging member to provide bracing against the wall of the structure.
In one configuration the wall-engaging member has an additional supporting extender member, which allows the wall-engaging member to engage the soffit of an overhang. In another configuration, an inward extender member and parapet engagement bracket allow for position attachment to a parapet roof feature.
Pairs of barrier cable engagement brackets having barrier cable receiving slots are spaced along the inner side of the stanchion vertical members for easy insertion or removal of an equal number of barrier cables, normally three in number. A mid-span barrier cable support and a barrier cable engagement bracket attachment may also be provided.
These and other features of the present invention will become readily apparent upon further review of the following specification and drawings.
Similar reference characters denote corresponding features consistently throughout the attached drawings.
The present invention is a roof perimeter cable guard system having a substantially vertical stanchion member supported at its lower end by an anchor bracket screwed to the outer edge of the roof perimeter feature to which it attaches.
Referring to
Stanchion vertical members 14 and main brace members 16 may be made from square tubing, e.g., 1″ square tubing, for light weight and strength. As shown in
The lower curved portion of the stanchion main brace member 16 extends below the lower or bottom end of the vertical member 14 and supports an adjustable wall-engaging member 20 by means of a sleeve 32, providing additional support to the stanchion 12 to avoid collapse upon a worker falling against a stanchion 12 or barrier cable 24 supported thereby. Additional roof mount supports 22 may be provided at corner stanchions 12 and at selected stanchions 12 along a wall to provide additional support against the inward stress imparted by the cable or wire rope barrier cables 24 as strung around the roof R. Roof mount supports 22 have a lower plate 25 screwed to the roof R as shown and are pinned at their upper ends to the upper end of vertical member 14 as shown, or main brace member 16 (see open pin bores as shown).
Pairs of barrier cable engagement brackets 26 (a single pair is shown in more detail in
Referring more particularly to
Lower brace and receiver member 30 has an inner portion 70 extending inward from vertical member 14, an outer portion 72 extending outward from the lower portion 46 of main brace member 16, and a center portion 74 between the lower portion 42 of vertical member 14 and the lower portion 46 of main brace member 16. An upper horizontal brace 76 is attached between the respective upper portion of vertical member 14 and main brace member 16 to further strengthen the structure of stanchion 12. A lower vertical brace 78 is placed across the arcuate lower portion of main brace member 16 to keep the arcuate lower portion rigid. Braces 76 and 78 may be made from any rigid material, e.g., a flat bar, a strap, a rod, etc.
Referring to
Extender member 80 has a shank 82 and an end sleeve 84, shank 82 being adjustably received by sleeve 32 of stanchion main brace member 16 by a pin 34 extending through a selected adjustment bore 88. The extender member 80 extends downward and inward from sleeve 32 and receives the shank of wall-engaging member 50 within extender member end sleeve 84 and is selectively fixed in place by setscrew 86. Wall-engaging pad 52 is held against soffit S by the extension upward of the shank of wall-engaging member 50 through sleeve 84 providing, along with anchor bracket 18, a clamping action over the overhang feature of roof R.
Referring to
Vertical shank 102 is adjustably secured in vertical end sleeve 94 by setscrew 110. Parapet engagement bracket 100 is vertically disposed and is formed in the shape of an inverted “T” (see
Referring to
Referring to
Mid-span supports 13 are placed as needed between stanchions 12 and are used to hold or prop up barrier cable 24. This becomes necessary should the distance between adjacent stanchions 12 be too great due to particular roof structure characteristics, causing the barrier cable 24 to sag below an acceptable limit. Mid-span support 13 can then be put into place, thereby holding the barrier cable 24 at an acceptable height. As shown in
Referring to
The attachment 35 may be secured into the retainment slots 122 of any pair of barrier cable engagement brackets 26 by a fastener 49, such as a bolt or pin, extending through holes in the rear portions of wall members 47. Once attachment 35 is in place, barrier cable 24 is supported on base portion 37, behind the cylindrical body portion 43 of rotatable bushing 41. Circular flange 45 acts to prevent the barrier cable 24 from riding up and off of the rotatable bushing 41. While attachment 35 may be mounted on any pair of barrier cable engagement brackets 26, it is most useful on the brackets 26 of stanchions 12 where the barrier cable changes direction, for example, at the corner of a building roof, and where the barrier cable 24 would have a tendency to bind in the retainment slots 122 of brackets 26. This allows for a more complete tightening of the barrier cables 24.
The stanchion of the roof safety system as described above is preferably made from aluminum for ease of handling, the design being such as to allow the use of aluminum without bending or failure in use. However, the stanchion may also be made of steel or other suitable material.
It is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described above, but encompasses any and all embodiments within the scope of the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/653,495, filed Feb. 17, 2005.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3452956 | Reed | Jul 1969 | A |
| 3880405 | Brueske | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3995833 | McLaughlin et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4666131 | Kettelkamp, Sr. et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 5573227 | Hemauer et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5586423 | Mullen | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5653308 | White | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5711398 | Bartholomew | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5730246 | Beard | Mar 1998 | A |
| 6038829 | Franks | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6053281 | Murray | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6270057 | Highley et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6276668 | Sweeley | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6585080 | Murray | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 20060180390 | Thaler | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2589182 | Apr 1987 | FR |
| 2 243 397 | Oct 1991 | GB |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20060180391 A1 | Aug 2006 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60653495 | Feb 2005 | US |