Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to improvements in a roofing ridge cover. More particularly, the present invention is for an elongated formed roof ridge that covers multiple existing roof ridge tiles making installation more efficient. The ridge cover provides coverage for a plurality of shingles and wraps at least partially around the shingles to prevent leakage. The ridge cover is formed from a metal base that is stone coated to match existing shingles.
2. Description of Related Art Including Information Disclosed Under 37 CFR 1.97 and 1.98
The ridge of a roof is one area of a roof that can deteriorate the fastest. This area of a roof is usually subjected to the full sunlight, rain and wind. All of these factors can significantly shorten the life of the ridge cap. A typical ridge cap is fabricated from several layers of roofing felt that are bonded together and then covered with small sand, stones or gravel. Because this area is one of the first parts that fail water can enter into a house from the ridge cap. Installing or replacing the ridge cap with a metal cap often results in a significantly different appearance from the surrounding roof material. Some solutions have been to install individual bent shingles resulting in the existence of openings around each shingle and significant labor to install the ridge cover. Several products and patents have been filed and issued on products that try to solve this problem. Exemplary examples of patents covering these products are disclosed herein.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,725,609 that issued on Apr. 27, 2004 to Mark Freiborg et al. and published application 2010/0275542 both disclose ridge or hip covers that simulate a single shingle. They are both formed from a flat blank that is formed along the edges and then bent in the middle to simulate the ridge or hip. Because of the simple bends that are made the parts can be slightly re-bent to accommodate varied angular ridges or hips. This patent is not metal and therefore it is not painted and does not have rust protection. These parts are then simply rust protected and or painted to match the color of the roof without any additional coatings. These patents only cover a single shingle, have limited wrap to cover existing shingles and they are embedded in the mat with asphalt and are not coated to simulate stone coated shingles.
U.S. Publication Number 2006/0154597 was published on Jul. 13, 2006 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,422,520 on Sep. 9, 2008 to Michael S. Coulton et al. and discloses an integrated vent that is bonded or captured under the top shingle material. The vent material extends essentially across the full width of the shingle where it can interfere with material or obstructions that extend from the base roof or ridge. This patent does not allow for coverage over shingled roofs where the roof ridge is stepped. This patent further does not disclose a stepped shingle or shingles. This patent further requires the rolled material to then be covered in the field when it is being installed.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,015,374 issued on Apr. 5, 1977 to George Epstein et al., and discloses an angled cap member for simulated cedar shake construction. The cap member is formed from a flat sheet of material and requires an elevated spacer that raises the cap above the roof. The cap is then screwed or bonded to the elevating member. The sheet metal is embossed to form simulated grain. This patent does not disclose sand, stone or gravel to simulate a shingle roof. It also does not have rounded reliefs that allow the cap to wrap around existing shingles.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,108,495 issued on Sep. 19, 2006 to Thomas Gilbert et al., discloses an apparatus for continuous forming shaped polymeric articles. The polymeric articles simulate the appearance of shake shingles arranged in rows or horizontal shingles. After the polymeric articles are formed they are surface treated to improve the wearability of the surface. While this patent is for creating the appearance of shingles. The shape is not stone coated nor is it useful for the roof ridge over shingles.
What is needed is a formed ridge cap where the cap is formed with sufficient fillets and rounds to prevent ripping of the shingle material. The ridge cap should provide coverage for multiple shingles and further be stone coated to simulate the appearance of a shingle ridge cap. These features are disclosed in this document herein.
It is an object of the roof ridge cover to be formed to give the appearance of multiple shingles. Fabricating the roof ridge with multiple panels reduces the number of ridge shingles that must be installed at a time. This ensures consistent spacing of the shingles and makes the ridge roof more secure on a roof because a larger quantity of nails or fasteners that are used to secure the roof ridge. This further provides a significant reduction in the number of locations where water can protrude into the roof of a house or building.
It is an object of the roof ridge cover to be fabricated with bend radius using fillets and rounds to ensure that the base material is not stretched beyond the yield point of the material where it can rupture or split. A fine balance must be maintained to ensure that the bends and forming radius both cover any existing tiles, provides the appearance of shingles and is manufacturable. If the ridge cover is too long the length can be cut down or shortened using existing tools that are used by roofing installers.
It is an object of the roof ridge cover for the edges of the cover to wrap around any existing roof tiles. The wrapping edges must be sufficient to cover any damaged tiles and provide sufficient clearance of adjacent or abutting ridge covers. The wrap edges must also be short enough to prevent the ridge cover to dig into other shingles or be raised above the surrounding area.
It is an object of the roof cover to be configurable for installation on hips, gables and rakes as well as 90 degree “L” shapes. The cover is not affected by climate nor have climate restrictions for installation.
It is another object of the roof ridge cover for the top surface of the cover to be stone coated. The stone coating provides a nearly identical appearance to the remainder of the roof surface. The stone coatings provide surface protection, wear resistance and provide a gripping surface for installers or others that may walk on the roof surface.
It is still another object of the roof ridge cover to be available with a vent that is bonded to the underside of the roofing ridge cover. The vent material is sufficiently porous to allow air to vent from the attic thereby allowing the attic to breath, but the vent must also be sufficiently dense enough to prevent insects and bugs from passing through the vent material. The vent material is glued, set or otherwise placed as one or two strips on the length and optionally the ends of the cover to reduce the amount of force that is required to firmly anchor the cover onto the roof ridge.
Various objects, features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments of the invention, along with the accompanying drawings in which like numerals represent like components.
The angle 30 of the two sloped sides of the roof ridge cover 10 is configured to match the angle of the roof peak ridge. The angle is typically 7 or 12, but can be other angles. It is also contemplated that the cover is configurable for installation on hips, gables and rakes as well as 90 degree “L” shapes. The fabrication process allows an installer to adjust this angle by nailing down the roof ridge cover 10 or manually distorting the roof ridge cover 10 to fit an existing roof ridge. The coverage of multiple pre-existing roof tiles minimizes areas where water intrusion can take place. The bends of the roof ridge cover 10 shown as rounds 31 and fillets 32 are designed to simulate the appearance of the underlying tiles and also prevent ripping the material that might cause holes. In the preferred embodiment the rounds 31 and fillets 32 are between 0.12 radius and 1.0 radius. In addition to the bends that clear the underlying shingles the leading edge 34 and the trailing edge 33 are radiused to wrap around the front and back edges to the roof ridge cover 10. Adjacent roof ridge cover 10 ends 33 and 34 engage upon the turned up 33 or turned down edges 34 to make a tight seal. The bottom edge 35 can be configured in a straight embodiment or can further be rounded to wrap around existing ridge tiles to prevent leakage. The dimension(s) of the radiused edges are maintained to prevent damage to flat roof tiles and reduce the elevation of the roof ridge cover 10 above the surrounding roof. Installation of the roof ridge cover 10 on a roof is shown in
Thus, specific embodiments of a roof ridge cover have been disclosed. It should be apparent, however, to those skilled in the art that many more modifications besides those described are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The inventive subject matter, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of applicant's application Ser. No. 29/377,116 filed Oct. 18, 2010, and application Ser. No. 29/385,747 filed Feb. 18, 2011 and provisional application 61/552,084 filed Oct. 27, 2011 the entire contents of which is hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1470054 | Broughton | Oct 1923 | A |
1653847 | Greenstreet | Dec 1927 | A |
1861998 | Bennett | Jun 1932 | A |
1963583 | Jenkins | Jun 1934 | A |
2160642 | Bumpas et al. | May 1939 | A |
2230922 | Young | Feb 1941 | A |
2255247 | Gabriel | Sep 1941 | A |
2360052 | Fuller | Oct 1944 | A |
2386338 | Norrid | Oct 1945 | A |
2725832 | Huntington | Dec 1955 | A |
3073235 | Smith et al. | Jan 1963 | A |
3114218 | Macquere | Dec 1963 | A |
3164929 | Boddie | Jan 1965 | A |
3731438 | Kough | May 1973 | A |
3760546 | Martin et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3953946 | Peters et al. | May 1976 | A |
4015374 | Epstein et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4015391 | Epstein et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4024685 | Aarons | May 1977 | A |
4322924 | Cooper | Apr 1982 | A |
4400217 | Kober | Aug 1983 | A |
4554862 | Wolfert | Nov 1985 | A |
4676147 | Mankowski | Jun 1987 | A |
4685265 | Cooper | Aug 1987 | A |
4788801 | Jones | Dec 1988 | A |
5295340 | Collins | Mar 1994 | A |
5304095 | Morris | Apr 1994 | A |
5352154 | Rotter et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5469680 | Hunt | Nov 1995 | A |
5561953 | Rotter | Oct 1996 | A |
5613337 | Plath et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5636490 | Stocksieker | Jun 1997 | A |
5881501 | Guffey | Mar 1999 | A |
6351913 | Freiborg et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
8245482 | Grubka et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20010032421 | Rotter | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020095882 | Rotter | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20040206012 | Pressutti et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050055902 | Pressutti et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20100218433 | Quaranta et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110214378 | Grubka et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120096782 | Railkar et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130042540 A1 | Feb 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61552084 | Oct 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 29377116 | Oct 2010 | US |
Child | 13660926 | US |