The broken lines in the drawings depict environmental subject matter only and form no part of the claimed design.
The broken lines in the drawings depict environmental subject matter only and form no part of the claimed design.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2724872 | Herbes | Nov 1955 | A |
3189471 | Thomas | Jun 1965 | A |
D203484 | Rousey et al. | Jan 1966 | S |
3484259 | Lewis et al. | Dec 1969 | A |
3524738 | Grubb et al. | Aug 1970 | A |
3535096 | Bour et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
3625134 | Smith | Dec 1971 | A |
3694982 | Gerhaher | Oct 1972 | A |
3804646 | Dumbaugh, Jr. | Apr 1974 | A |
3861926 | Irlam et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3887386 | Majumdar | Jun 1975 | A |
3892581 | Burgman et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
3904423 | Guthrie | Sep 1975 | A |
4063001 | Zlochower | Dec 1977 | A |
4199364 | Neely | Apr 1980 | A |
4325724 | Froberg | Apr 1982 | A |
4366251 | Rapp | Dec 1982 | A |
4375527 | Zahner | Mar 1983 | A |
4491951 | Dunn | Jan 1985 | A |
4582748 | Eastes | Apr 1986 | A |
4643080 | Trostle et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4676147 | Mankowski | Jun 1987 | A |
4764487 | Lewis | Aug 1988 | A |
4817506 | Cashman | Apr 1989 | A |
4857485 | Brennan et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4892846 | Rogers et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4903445 | Mankowski | Feb 1990 | A |
4924761 | MacLeod et al. | May 1990 | A |
4935291 | Gunnink | Jun 1990 | A |
4957037 | Tubbesing et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4976587 | Johnston et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5009149 | MacLeod et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5022203 | Boyd | Jun 1991 | A |
5052286 | Tubbesing et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5092225 | Sells | Mar 1992 | A |
5095810 | Robinson | Mar 1992 | A |
5122095 | Wolfert | Jun 1992 | A |
5134827 | Hartman | Aug 1992 | A |
5149301 | Gates | Sep 1992 | A |
5302444 | Jackson et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5332699 | Olds et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5457920 | Waltz | Oct 1995 | A |
5458538 | MacLeod et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5474425 | Lawlor | Dec 1995 | A |
5542224 | Olsen | Aug 1996 | A |
5569629 | TenEyck et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5576252 | Rapp et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5585312 | TenEyck et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5636481 | DeZen | Jun 1997 | A |
5772502 | Smith | Jun 1998 | A |
5789329 | Eastes et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797222 | Martin | Aug 1998 | A |
5826390 | Sacks | Oct 1998 | A |
5851932 | Dickson et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5935886 | Jensen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5948535 | Chiurlo et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5962354 | Fyles et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971848 | Nair et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5997977 | Zou et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6063470 | Zou et al. | May 2000 | A |
6101847 | Shamp et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6128869 | Brotherton et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6136735 | Gallo et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6149517 | Hansen | Nov 2000 | A |
6165066 | Sharp et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6174119 | Orr | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6212833 | Henderson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214429 | Zou et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6227963 | Headrick | May 2001 | B1 |
6233887 | Smith | May 2001 | B1 |
6237369 | LeBlanc et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6248678 | Pinckney | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6260315 | Smith | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277024 | Coulton | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6298613 | Coulton et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6299528 | Hansen | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306786 | Koyama et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314760 | Chenoweth | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6329310 | Peuchert et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6361434 | Brandon | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371847 | Headrick | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6399527 | Kishimoto et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
D462790 | Bullinger et al. | Sep 2002 | S |
6457943 | Olsen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6482084 | Hansen | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6491581 | Mankowski | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6540508 | Simpson et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565431 | Villela | May 2003 | B1 |
6579599 | Blum et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6684581 | Robinson et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6686304 | Wallenberger | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6793574 | Robinson | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6809050 | McGinnis | Oct 2004 | B1 |
D503790 | Dodge et al. | Apr 2005 | S |
6881144 | Hansen et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6933045 | Tamura | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6933252 | Pierce | Aug 2005 | B2 |
D511847 | Ciepliski | Nov 2005 | S |
D511848 | Ciepliski | Nov 2005 | S |
6981916 | Coulton | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6998361 | Lewis | Feb 2006 | B2 |
D527813 | Dodge et al. | Sep 2006 | S |
7219473 | Mantyla et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7259118 | Jubb et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
D555237 | O'Hagin | Nov 2007 | S |
7384331 | Coulton | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7449419 | Li | Nov 2008 | B2 |
D602579 | Stone | Oct 2009 | S |
7662037 | Polston | Feb 2010 | B2 |
D615218 | Grubka et al. | May 2010 | S |
7765754 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7766735 | Ciepliski et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
D628718 | Grubka et al. | Dec 2010 | S |
D654161 | Holland et al. | Feb 2012 | S |
8292707 | Grisham et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8322089 | Railkar et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
D694394 | Polston | Nov 2013 | S |
20020000101 | Chenoweth | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020045528 | Kusuno et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030077178 | Stearns | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030166446 | Lewis | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188554 | Baker et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030207748 | Wallenberger | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030224922 | Wallenberger | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040092379 | Lewis | May 2004 | A1 |
20040237428 | Headrick et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050014624 | Jubb et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050031703 | Beier et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050084440 | Chacon et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085369 | Jensen | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090377 | Shelestak et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050130581 | Dodge | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050130825 | Kravchenko et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050232828 | Merry | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234216 | Klein et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060003884 | Nishizawa et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060040608 | Coulton | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060079173 | Coulton et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060154597 | Coulton et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060211366 | Villela et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229010 | Villela et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060257240 | Naskali et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070000192 | Mantyla et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070049190 | Sing | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070054612 | Ehrman et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070072539 | Sells | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070072540 | Ciepliski et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070094953 | Galeazzo et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070105701 | Hoffmann et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070107220 | Bakhuis et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070117505 | Wey et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070213003 | Railkar et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080009403 | Hofmann et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080064320 | Polston | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20100112932 | Grubka | May 2010 | A1 |
20100144266 | Lowe et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110195655 | Holland et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20130023197 | Grisham et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3935600 | Mar 1990 | DE |
428720 | May 1935 | GB |
58-064243 | Apr 1983 | JP |
2007055964 | May 2007 | WO |
2007055968 | May 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Part 1—Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,793,574, Control No. 95/001,952 dated Mar. 29, 2012 (pp. 1-100). |
Part 2—Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,793,574, Control No. 95/001,952 dated Mar. 29, 2012 (pp. 101-149 and exhibits). |
Office Action granting Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,793,574, Control No. 951001,952 dated May 9, 2012. |
Office Action regarding Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,793,574, Control No. 95/001,952 dated May 9, 2012. |
Patent Owner's Response Pursuant to 37 CFR Section 1.945 regarding Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,793,574, Control No. 95/001,952 dated Jul. 5, 2012. |
Requester Comments After Patent Owner's Response regarding Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,793,574, Control No. 95/001,952 dated Aug. 6, 2012. |
Submission of signed Declaration of Denise Laytart in support of Requester Comments After Patent Owner's Response regarding Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,793,574, Control No. 95/001,952 dated Aug. 13, 2012. |
Patent Owner's Amendment and Response regarding Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,793,574, Control No. 95/001,952 dated Sep. 26, 2012. |
Office Action closing prosecution regarding Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,793,574, Control No. 95/001,952 dated Aug. 28, 2012. |
Patent Owner's Petition Under 37 CFR Section 1.182—Request for Continued Reexamination regarding Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,793,574, Control No. 95/001,952 dated Sep. 27, 2012. |
Patent Owner's Amendment and Response regarding Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,793,574, Control No. 95/001,952 dated Oct. 23, 2012. |
Requester Comments after Patent Owner's Response regarding Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,793,574, Control No. 95/001,952 dated Oct. 26, 2012. |
Office Action denying Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,482,084, Control No. 95/001,953 dated May 11, 2012. |
Requester's Petition Under 37 CFR Sections 1.927 and 1.181 for Supervisory Review of Refusal to Order Reexamination of Claims 1-8 of US Patent No. 6,482,084 regarding Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,482,084, Control No. 95/001,953 dated Jun. 8, 2012. |
Decision on Petition Under 37 CFR 1.181 and 1.927 regarding Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,482,084, Control No. 95/001,953 dated Jul. 25, 2012. |
Office Action denying Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,299,528, Control No. 95/001,954 dated May 11, 2012. |
Requester's Petition Under 37 CFR Sections 1.927 and 1.181 for Supervisory Review of Refusal to Order Reexamination of Claims 1-3 of US Patent No. 6,299,5284 regarding Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,299,528, Control No. 95/001,954 dated Jun. 8, 2012. |
Decision on Petition Under 37 CFR 1.181 and 1.927 regarding Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,299,528, Control No. 951001,954 dated Jul. 25, 2012. |
Office Action granting Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,299,528, Control No. 95/002,080 dated Sep. 13, 2012. |
Office Action regarding Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,299,528, Control No. 95/002,080 dated Sep. 13, 2012. |
Patent Owner Air Vent, Inc.'s Response to Office Action of Sep. 13, 2012 regarding Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,299,528, Control No. 95/002,080 dated Nov. 12, 2012. |
Requestor Comments after Patent Owner's Response regarding Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,299,528, Control No. 95/002,080 dated Dec. 12, 2012. |
Office Action granting Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,482,084, Control No. 95/002,081 dated Sep. 13, 2012. |
Office Action regarding Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,482,084, Control No. 95/002,081 dated Sep. 13, 2012. |
Patent Owner Air Vent, Inc.'s Response to Office Action of Sep. 13, 2012 regarding Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,482,084, Control No. 95/002,081 dated Nov. 12, 2012. |
Requestor Comments after Patent Owner's Response regarding Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,482,084, Control No. 95/002,081 dated Dec. 12, 2012. |
Part 1—Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,482,084, Control No. 95/001,953 dated Mar. 30, 2012 (pp. 1-135). |
Part 2—Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,482,084, Control No. 95/001,953 dated Mar. 30, 2012 (pp. 136-221 and exhibits). |
Part 1—Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,299,528, Control No. 95/001,954 dated Mar. 30, 2012 (pp. 1-100). |
Part 2—Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,299,528, Control No. 95/001,954 dated Mar. 30, 2012 (pp. 101-142 and exhibits). |
Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,299,528, Control No. 95/002,080 dated Aug. 16, 2012. |
Request for Inter Partes Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,482,084, Control No. 95/002,081 dated Aug. 16, 2012. |
Defendant Owens Corning Corporation's Non-Infringement and Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to LPR 3.4 dated Feb. 20, 2012 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Complaint for Patent Infringement [Doc. 1] dated Dec. 17, 2010 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Doc. 10] dated Feb. 14, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of Motion for a Preliminary Injunction [Doc. 11] dated Feb. 14, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Declaration of Robert Bradley Holland and Exhibits 7-10 in Support of Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of Motion for a Preliminary Injunction [Doc. 15] dated Feb. 15, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Defendant's Memorandum in Opposition to Air Vent, Inc.'s Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Doc. 25] dated Mar. 7, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Air Vent's Reply to Owens Corning's Opposition to Motion for a Preliminary Injunction [Doc. 32] dated Mar. 14, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement [Doc. 41] dated Jul. 14, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction [Doc. 44] dated Jul. 26, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count Three of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) [Doc. 45] in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Defendant's Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Dismiss Count Three of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) [Doc. 46] dated Aug. 1, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Defendant's Memorandum in Opposition to Air Vent, Inc.'s Renewed Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Doc. 49] dated Aug. 10, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 52] dated Aug. 22, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Opposition to Motion for a Preliminary Injunction [Doc. 54] dated Aug. 26, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Defendant's Reply in Support its Motion to Dismiss Count Three of the Amended Complaint [Doc. 57] dated Sep. 8, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Plaintiff's Surreply in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 60] dated Sep. 12, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Reply to Plaintiff's Surreply in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count Three of the Amended Complaint [Doc. 63] dated Sep. 16, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of US Patent Nos. 6,299,528 and 6,482,084 [Doc. 64] dated Oct. 25, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Defendant's Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of US Patent Nos. 6,299,528 and 6,482,084 [Doc. 65] dated Oct. 25, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Concise Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of US Patent Nos. 6,299,528 and 6,482,084 [Doc. 66] dated Oct. 25, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Appendix of Exhibits in Support of Defendant's Concise Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of US Patent Nos. 6,299,528 and 6,482,084 [Doc. 67] dated Oct. 25, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Defendant Owens Corning Corporation's Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement [Doc. 69] dated Nov. 14, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Plaintiff Air Vent, Inc.'s Answer to Defendant Owens Corning Corporation's Counterclaims [Doc. 71] dated Nov. 22, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,299,528 and 6,482,04 [Doc. 72] dated Nov. 22, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Declaration of David L. Roodvoets in Support of Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,299,528 and 6,482,04 [Doc. 73] dated Nov. 22, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Concise Statement of Facts in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 75] dated Nov. 22, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Defendant's Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of US Patent Nos. 6,299,528 and 6,482,084 [Doc. 80] dated Dec. 6, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Plaintiff's Surreply in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement [Doc. 83] dated Dec. 14, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Surreply [Doc. 87] dated Dec. 23, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Reply [Doc. 92] dated Dec. 28, 2011 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement [Doc. 130] dated Aug. 29, 2012 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Defendant Owens Corning Corporation's Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement [Doc. 134] dated Sep. 19, 2012 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Declaration of David L. Roodvoets in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay [Doc. 136] dated Sep. 24, 2012 in Civil Action No. 10-1699, Air Vent, Inc. v. Owens Corning Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. |
Installation Instructions for Owens Corning VentSure Rigid Strip Ridge Vent dated Mar. 2000 (4 pages). |
Owens Corning Press Release—Great Exterior Makeover—dated Oct. 13, 1999. |
Installation Instructions for Owens Corning VentSure Rigid Strip Ridge Vent dated Oct. 1999 (6 pages). |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/393,261 dated Aug. 16, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 29/332,162 dated Jul. 15, 2009. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 29/327,214 dated Sep. 13, 2010. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,739 dated Sep. 24, 2008. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,739 dated Dec. 18, 2008. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,702 dated Sep. 24, 2008. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,702 dated Dec. 23, 2008. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/393,261 dated Aug. 16, 2012. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/393,261 dated Feb. 15, 2013. |
Advisory action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/393,261 dated May 1, 2013. |
Installation Instructions for Owens Corning VentSure Rigid Strip Ridge Vent dated Mar. 2000. |