Roofing asphalt compositions containing hydrocracked pitch

Abstract

The present invention relates to a roofing grade asphalt composition which comprises a blend of (a) a petroleum pitch obtained as a residue in the hydrocracking of hydrocarbon oils and (b) as a diluent therefor preferably a paving grade asphalt cement of 150-200 penetration.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to bituminous compositions and, more particularly, asphaltic compositions which are suitable for use as roofing materials.

Asphalt is a natural constituent of crude oils and is typically produced from the distillation residues of refining feedstocks. This product is of very significant industrial importance since it is widely used in the construction of roads, building materials and other industrial applications. This asphalt has normally been obtained from conventionl petroleum oils.

With the changing economics of the petroleum industry, there is a trend toward the conversion of heavy hydrocarbon oils, such as the distillation residues, to light and intermediate naphthas of good quality for reforming feedstock, fuel oil and gas oils. These residues represent the normal sources of asphalts.

Roofing asphalts are also obtained from distillation residues, but normally require considerable air blowing to attain the desired properties for binding, adhesion, water proofing etc. Diverse applications of air blown bitumen have resulted in the development of standard specifications for various uses.

Asphalt specifications for roofing purposes are given in Table I below:

TABLE I______________________________________Asphalt requirements for roofing purposes Type 1 Type 2 Type 3Property Min. Max. Min. Max. Min. Max.______________________________________Softening Point 60 68 75 83 90 98(R & B, .degree.C.)Flash Point 230 -- 230 -- 230 --(C.O.C. .degree.C.)Penetration0.degree. C., 200 g, 60 s 10 -- 10 -- 8 --25.degree. C., 100 g, 5 s 30 45 20 30 15 2545.degree. C., 50 g, 5 s -- 160 -- 80 -- 55Thin film oven test 80 -- 80 -- 80 --pen., % of originalLoss of volatiles, % -- 1.0 -- 1.0 -- 1.0Solubility in 99 -- 99 -- 99 --trichloroethylene, %______________________________________

It is the object of the present invention to develop a blended roofing asphalt which can utilize unwanted processing residues, while avoiding the need of the costly air blowing process.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with this invention, it has been found that an asphalt product matching the characteristics of the traditional air blown residues can be produced by blending (a) a petroleum pitch obtained as a residue in the hydrocracking of hydrocarbon oils and (b) as a diluent therefor a vacuum residuum with a penetration of 60-400, preferably a paving grade asphalt cement.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The pitches that are used in the present invention are residues of hydrocracking which usually boil above 524.degree. C. and they may come from the hydrocracking of regular crude oils or from the hydrocracking of heavy hydrocarbon oils, including heavy bituminous oils extracted from tar sands. While the pitches which can be used may be derived from processes providing a wide range of pitch conversions, they are usually derived from processes having a pitch conversion of at least 40% and preferably in excess of 80% pitch conversion, such as that described in Canadian Pat. No. 1,151,579, issued Aug. 9, 1983.

The diluents are preferably paving grade asphalt cements. Typical asphalt cement specifications for road paving purposes are given in Table 2 below:

TABLE 2______________________________________Asphalt cement specifications for road purposes(16-GP-3M)Grade 85-100 120-150 150-200 ASTMRequirements Min. Max. Min. Max. Min. Max. Method______________________________________Penetration 85 100 120 150 150 200 D 5(25.degree. C.,100 g, 5 s)Flash point 230 -- 220 -- 220 -- D 92(CO C, .degree.C.)Ductility 100 -- 100 -- 100 -- D 113(25.degree. C., 5cm/min, cm)Thin film 47 -- 42 -- 40 -- D 1745oven test(Pen. ofresidue % oforiginal Pen.)Solubility in 99.0 -- 99.0 -- 99.0 -- D 2042Trichloro-ethylene(wt %)______________________________________

It is preferable to use a road asphalt of 150-200 penetration, although it is possible to use some asphalt of 85-100 penetration. However, softer grade road asphalt of 200 penetration is not suitable because physical properties such as softening point and penetration cannot be raised sufficently to meet Type 1 roofing asphalt specifications.

The processed pitch and the paving grade asphalt cement can be blended in widely varying proportions, provided the resulting blend meets the specifications of Table 1. However, the composition of this invention is particularly valuable in its ability to accept large proportions of pitches derived from high pitch conversion processes. Preferably at least 25% processed pitch is utilized in the compositions of this invention. According to a particularly preferred embodiment, at least 30% by weight of a pitch obtained from a greater than 80% pitch conversion process is combined with a 150-200 penetration road asphalt cement.

Thoughout this specification, certain terms of art are used which are defined as follows:

Deasphaltening

The asphaltene portion was precipitated by the addition of twenty volumes of n-heptane to one volume of asphalt blend. The slurry was agitated for 15 min. in a ultrasonic bath and the asphaltenes (n-heptane insolubles), were separated by filtration on a Whatman filter paper (No. 1). The asphaltenes were washed with 10 volumes of n-heptane, dried at 50.degree. C. under reduced pressure. The maltenes (n-heptane solubles) and washings were combined and the solvent removed using a Buchi-Rotavapor. The asphaltenes obtained by this method would also contain the toluene insolubles.

Compound Type Separation

The deasphaltened blend (about (1.4 g) was separated into compound-type concentrates of saturates, monodiaromatics, polynuclear aromatics and resins on a dual packed silica-gel alumina column. The column consists of a vertical stainless steel tube (137.times.1.25 cm o.d.) packed in its lower half with 37 g of activated silica gel D-12 and top half with 47 g of activated alumina F-20. The following eluant sequence was used to elute the corresponding compound-type concentrates: n-pentane (330 mL), n-pentane/benzene 10% (500 mL), benzene/ethyl acetate 5% (130 mL) and methanol (200 mL) followed by benzene (100 mL) and 100 mL of pentane. A Lapp pump LS-30 was used with a flow rate of about 5 mL/min.

Molecular Weight Determination by Gel Permeation Chromatography

The Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC) work was performed on a Beckman Model 112 High Performance Liquid Chromatograph. The molecular weight determination were made using two GPC systems--one system using 500 .ANG. and 100 .ANG. Ultrastyragel columns (Waters Associates) in series and other systems with 1000 .ANG. and 100 .ANG. Ultrastyragel columns in series. Tetrahydrofuran (THF) (Burdick and Jackson "distilled in glass") was used at 1 mL/min. flow rate as mobile phase. The concentrations of the samples in THF were limited to 0.1-0.25% in order to avoid "concentration effects" on the retention results. The column eluate was monitored with a Schoeffel Model SF770 UV-vis detector operating at 254 nm and the data were recorded on a Spectra Physics SP4100 printer plotter.

Elemental Analysis and Physical Tests

The samples were analyzed for C, H, N on a Perkin Elmer model 240 Analyzer and the sulphur was determined on a LECO.

The physical tests, viscosity, penetration, ductility, solubility in trichloroethylene and softening point were performed according to the ASTM procedures.

Certain preferred features of the present invention will be better understood from consideration of the experimental data in the following examples.

EXAMPLE 1

A variety of blending products were prepared as follows:

Diluents

1. Asphalt cement, 150-200 penetration, obtained from Petro-Canada, Montreal East Refinery, composed of light Saskatchewan blend, Agha Jari, Mexican and other crude distillation residues. 2. Asphalt cement, 150-200 penetration, obtained from Petro-Canada, Taylor Refinery, B.C. composed of Boundary Lake and B.C. light distillation residues. 3. Asphalt cement, 150-200 penetration, obtained from another petroleum refinery.

Pitches

4. Light Arabian pitch, 76% pitch conversion (82-CG-37). 5. Blend 24 pitch, 87% pitch conversion (84-CG-210). 6. IPPL pitch, 80% pitch conversion (84-CG-216).

Type 1 Commercial Roofing Asphalts

7. Type 1 roofing asphalt, 30-45 penetration, obtained from Petro-Canada, Montreal East Refinery. 8. Type 1 roofing asphalt, 30-45 penetration, obtained from another petroleum refinery.

The above blending materials had the chemical analyses and physical properties shown in Tables 3 and 4 below:

TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________Ultimate analysis of processed residuesand asphalt cements Sample No. 1 2 3 4 5 6__________________________________________________________________________Specific gravity 15/15.degree. C. 1.024 1.008 1.022 1.144 1.190 1.179Carbon, wt % 84.19 86.62 83.66 84.06 84.2 83.98Hydrogen, wt % 9.84 7.81 10.22 7.54 6.82 7.02Sulphur, wt % 4.21 2.24 3.52 3.54 3.09 3.25Nitrogen, wt % 0.53 0.65 1.04 1.20 1.43 1.28R.C.R., wt % 19.0 19.9 16.8 45.4 57.9 57.7Heptane solubles, wt % 80.6 91.5 84.0 52.3 42.5 45.0Heptane insolubles, wt % 19.4 8.5 16.0 33.7 57.5 55.0Toluene insolubles, wt % 0.3 0.4 0.1 6.0 25.8 22.4Vanadium, ppm 514 243 157 231 1967 405Nickel, ppm 87 82 73 156 310 236Ash, wt % 0.09 0.05 0.04 0.95 3.49 5.69__________________________________________________________________________ TABLE 4______________________________________Physical properties of processes residuesand asphalt cement Sample No. 1 2 3 4 5 6______________________________________Penetration 157 168 140 0 0 025.degree. C., 100 g, 5 sViscosity, 135.degree. C. 217 205 240 -- -- --Kn, cStSoftening Point 43 43 39 102 134 119(R & B, .degree.C.)Flash Point 310 332 330 327 340 340(C.O.C., .degree.C.)Solubility in 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.0 85.8 85.8trichloroethylene, %______________________________________

It will be seen from the physical properties that the blending materials by themselves are not suitable for road asphalts as they do not meet the specifications set out in Table 1 above.

BLENDING

Different blends were prepared using as one component of each blend one of the pitches described above and as the other component a diluent selected from the three asphalt cements. These blends were prepared to meet the Type 1 penetration specification of Table 1. The different amounts of pitch used in the different blends are set out in Table 5 below.

In the blending procedure used, the samples were preheated and conditioned to enable pouring and weighing. The components were then blended to achieve a penetration of 30-45 as required for a Type 1 roofing asphalt. The blend was then reheated on a hot plate at the softening point of the pitch for conditioning and agitating to yield a homogeneous mixture.

TABLE 5______________________________________Weight percent of processed residue inblend mixture to obtain Type 1 roofing asphalt Asphalt Cement 1 2 3______________________________________Processedresidue 4 29* (38) 29 (31) 29 (35) 5 24 (37) -- 25 (32) 6 26 (38) -- --______________________________________ *Penetration is indicated in brackets.

The chemical analyses and the physical properties of six different blends that were prepared and two commercial roofing asphalts are shown in Tables 6 and 7 below.

TABLE 6__________________________________________________________________________Ultimate analysis of blended roofing asphalts Sample No. 1-4 2-4 3-4 1-5 3-5 1-6 7 8__________________________________________________________________________Specific gravity 1.051 1.053 1.052 1.057 1.055 1.061 1.025 1.02715/15.degree. C.Carbon, wt % 85.50 86.45 84.67 84.63 84.13 83.86 85.21 84.19Hydrogen, wt % 9.52 9.75 9.44 9.14 9.30 9.27 10.01 9.95Sulphur, wt % 4.09 2.56 4.40 3.80 4.12 3.78 3.52 4.53Nitrogen, wt % 0.62 0.72 0.54 0.78 0.74 0.69 0.63 0.37Heptane 74.2 83.3 77.9 73.9 71.4 72.1 74.6 72.8solubles, wt %Heptane 25.8 16.7 22.1 26.1 28.6 27.9 25.4 27.2insolubles, wt %Toluene 0.2 0.2 0.2 1.7 1.4 2.5 0.1 0.1insolubles, wt %Vanadium, ppm 355 175 115 1123 671 414 427 174Nickel, ppm 66 55 59 176 140 129 108 78Ash, wt % 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.53 0.98 1.23 0.08 0.04__________________________________________________________________________ TABLE 7__________________________________________________________________________Physical properties of blended roofing asphalts Sample No. 1-4 2-4 3-4 1-5 3-5 1-6 7 8__________________________________________________________________________Penetration0.degree. C., 200 g, 50 s 15 11 15 15 12 14 19 2125.degree. C., 100 g, 5 s 38 31 35 37 31 38 40 4245.degree. C., 50 g, 5 s 162 166 191 155 134 164 123 125Viscosity at 135.degree. C. 315 381 366 683 636 404 762 1097Kn, cStSoftening point 55 57 52 57 56 56 61 62(R & B, .degree.C.)Flash point, .degree.C. >300 >300 >300 >300 >300 >300 >300 >300(C.O.C.)Solubility in 99.9 99.9 99.8 98.3 98.6 97.6 99.9 99.9trichloroethylene, %Thin film oven test 83 83 82 82 81 85 80 81Penetration,% of originalLoss on heating, % 0.03 0.06 0.05 0.01 0.05 0.01 0.06 0.19Sweatability test 0.747 0.404 0.368 1.282 0.402 0.618 0.802 0.586Stability number__________________________________________________________________________

It will be noted from the above tables that the H/C ratio of the blends are lower than the roofing asphalts, indicating that they are more hydrogen deficient. The n-heptane insolubles content of the blends are in the same range as the roofing asphalts. Typical roofing asphalts contain from 20 to 30 wt % of n-heptane insolubles. The toluene insolubles contents are relatively low and comparable to roofing asphalts. However, blends 1-5, 3-5 and 1-6 contain higher toluene insolubles because of the high toluene insolubles content of the corresponding pitches.

Table 7 shows two major differences in the physical properties of the blends compared with refinery asphalts. The softening points and the viscosity values are slightly lower. This can be explained by the lower molecular weight of the compound types as presented in Tables 8 and 9 below.

TABLE 8______________________________________Molecular weight distribution of processedresidues and asphalt cementsAverage Molecular WeightSample Total Sample Maltenes Asphaltenes______________________________________1 1600 1200 33202 1340 1230 27503 1575 975 42304 400 390 5255 300 340 3256 360 390 385______________________________________ TABLE 9______________________________________Molecular weight distribution ofblended asphaltsAverage Molecular WeightSample Total Sample Maltenes Asphaltenes______________________________________1-3 1040 600 25302-4 760 640 18103-4 1120 690 27001-5 800 620 13803-5 940 670 19101-6 910 725 15307 2220 1080 70408 3690 1090 9760______________________________________

Although the softening points are slightly lower than the minimum value of 60, the blends are still acceptable as supported by the sweatability results as shown in Table 7 above. The sweatability test allows the determination of the oils that have separated from the mixture in the roofing asphalt and low values indicate a better performance. It will be noted that blend 3-4 does not meet other specifications and, therefore, is not acceptable.

As shown in Table 8, the molecular weight of the pitches and corresponding asphaltenes are lower than 1,000. The molecular weight of the processing pitch decreased with increasing pitch conversion.

The major difference in the blends of this invention compared to air-blown asphalts is the molecular weight. As shown in Table 9, the molecular weight of the asphaltenes in the blends ranges from 1380 to 2700 compared with from 7040 to 9760 in the air-blown asphalts. This trend is observed both for the total sample and the maltenes. Lower molecular weight does not seem to affect the performance as shown by the TFOT and sweatability results. Therefore, the results suggest that the physical properties except viscosity and softening point are mainly governed by the asphaltene content rather than the molecular weight.

The chemical composition of asphalts is important since it determines the rheological properties. The compound-type distribution results of the processed residues and asphalts cements are presented in Tables 10 and 11 below.

TABLE 10______________________________________Compound-type distribution of processedresidues and asphalt cements (n-heptane solubles, wt %)Sample Saturates Mono-diaromatics Polyacromatics Resins______________________________________1 19.1 21.4 26.0 33.52 24.5 23.1 28.5 23.03 23.1 20.2 27.0 29.74 11.8 11.0 30.1 47.15 22.5 7.9 33.9 35.76 22.4 8.2 34.4 35.0______________________________________ TABLE 11______________________________________Compound-type distribution of processed residuesand asphalt cements (wt %)Sample Saturates Aromatics Resins *Asphaltenes______________________________________1 15.5 38.3 27.1 19.12 23.4 47.4 21.1 8.13 19.4 39.7 29.7 16.04 7.8 27.3 31.2 33.75 9.6 17.7 15.2 57.56 10.1 19.2 15.7 55.0______________________________________ *Asphaltenes correspond to the nheptane insolubles content.

The results in Table 10 in the n-heptane soluble portion of the processed residues shows less saturates and monodiaromatics contents compared with the asphalt cements. The resin content is also higher for the pitches. However, the polynuclear aromatics content is about the same. Table 11 shows a higher asphaltene content for the pitches. Mixing of the pitches with the asphalt cements results in increasing the viscosity of the mixture and lowering of the average molecular weight.

The compound-type distribution of the blended samples of this invention is given in pages 12 and 13 below.

TABLE 12______________________________________Compound-type distribution of blended roofingasphalts (n-heptane solubles, wt %)Sample Saturates Mono-diaromatics Polyaromatics Resins______________________________________1-4 21.7 21.4 27.7 29.22-4 20.9 22.5 28.6 28.03-4 21.6 17.3 29.8 31.31-5 22.5 19.2 27.5 30.83-5 21.3 18.6 30.0 30.11-6 18.6 19.6 28.4 33.47 26.4 22.0 26.2 25.48 27.2 22.6 28.1 22.1______________________________________ TABLE 13______________________________________Compound-type distribution of blendedroofing asphalts (wt %)Sample Saturates Aromatics Resins Asphaltenes______________________________________1-4 16.1 36.4 21.7 25.82-4 17.4 42.6 23.3 16.73-4 16.8 36.7 24.4 22.11-5 16.6 34.5 22.8 26.13-5 15.2 34.7 21.5 28.61-6 13.4 34.6 24.1 27.97 19.7 36.0 18.9 25.48 19.8 36.9 16.1 27.2______________________________________In general, the composition of all blends is similar to the compositionof roofing asphalts. The blends have somewhat lower saturates content andhigher resins content compared with roofing asphalts. The major portionof the saturates in the blends is provided by the asphalt cements and themajor portion of the resins is provided by the processed residues. Table12 shows the whole compositions (including the toluene insolubles) of theblends and roofing asphalts. The overall results show an increase ofresins content at the expense of saturates content for the blends

Claims

1. A roofing grade asphalt composition comprising a blend of:

(a) a processed residue boiling above 524.degree. C. and obtained from high pitch conversion hydrocracking of hydrocarbon oils and

(b) as a diluent therefor a vacuum residuum having a penetration at 25.degree. C. of 60-400.

2. A composition according to claim 1 wherein the diluent is a paving grade asphalt cement.

3. A composition according to claim 2 wherein the paving grade asphalt cement has a penetration at 25.degree. C. of less than 200.

4. A composition according to claim 2 wherein the paving grade asphalt cement has a penetration at 25.degree. C. of 150-200.

5. A composition according to claim 3 wherein the processed residue is present in the composition in an amount of at least 25% by weight of the total composition.

6. A composition according to claim 3 wherein the hydrocracked pitch is present in the composition in an amount of at least 30% by weight of the total composition.

7. A composition according to claim 2 wherein the pitch conversion is at least 80%.

8. A composition according to claim 2 wherein the heavy hydrocarbon oil is a tar sand bitumen.