This invention relates to an improved roofing system and roofing shingles that may be utilized in the roofing system. In particular, the invention relates to roofing shingles featuring unique dimensions and a roofing system that utilizes the shingles.
Roofing products are often divided into three broad groups: shingles, roll roofing, and underlayment. Shingles and roll roofing typically function as outer roof coverings designed to withstand exposure to weather and the elements. Shingles and roll roofing generally contain the same basic components which provide protection and long term wear associated with asphalt roofing products. These components include a base material made from an organic felt or fiberglass mat which serves as a matrix to support the other components and gives the product the required strength to withstand manufacturing, handling, installation and service in the intended environment. An asphalt coating formulated for the particular service application is often applied to the base material to provide the desired long-term ability to resist weathering and to provide stability under temperature extremes. An outer layer of mineral granules is also commonly applied to the asphalt coating to form a surface exposed to the weather which shields the asphalt coating from the sun's rays, adds color to the final product and provides fire resistance.
Typically, shingles are installed on a roof deck such that the shingles are in a row from left to right and the lateral edges of the shingles in the row are contiguous with each other so as to abut each other, i.e. their lateral edges are adjacent to one another. Each row represents a course and the shingles are applied in overlapping courses on the roof deck, wherein the buttlap portion of a subsequent course is placed on the headlap portion of a previous course. The headlap portion of a conventional shingle is at least as wide as the buttlap portion of the shingle so that when the shingles are installed on a roof deck in overlapping courses, the entire buttlap portion of a subsequent course has headlap beneath it. This manner of installation prevents leakage to the roof deck where the lateral edges of the shingles abut each other.
In a typical roofing system, contiguous shingles in a row abut each other at their lateral edges. Thus, when the shingles are exposed to wet weather, it is possible that leakage can occur at the region where the shingles abut. To prevent that, overlapping subsequent rows of shingles are installed in an offset pattern and each shingle's headlap portion is at least as wide as the buttlap portion. Thus, when the shingles are applied to the roof in a plurality of courses and the buttlap portion of a second course of shingles is laid over the headlap portion of a first row of shingles there is always headlap present underneath the regions where the contiguous shingles in a row abut. Any water penetrating the places where lateral edges of shingles abut contacts the underlying headlap rather than the roof deck.
Asphalt shingles are among the most commonly used roofing materials. Asphalt shingles, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,990,779, have been used extensively in residential housing as roof covering due to their aesthetics, ease of installation, water shedding function, and excellent field performance over a long period of time. U.S. Pat. No. 6,990,779 discloses a laminated roofing shingle system including a reduced-width headlap portion and an interply material that is installed under the buttlap portion in order to compensate for the reduced-width headlap portion and provide protection to the roof deck.
In some cases, prior art shingles may rely on redundant overlapping to ensure adequate water shedding performance, particularly in high wind or wind-driven rain conditions. For example, a typical prior art shingle know as a “3-tab shingle” would require approximately 240 ft2 of sheet material to cover a 100 ft2 of roof area (also known as a “square”). Other types of shingles also require significantly high amounts of overlapping materials to achieve adequate performance for resistance to water infiltration.
Various shingles have been developed that employ a shiplap or side-lap feature such that when applied to a roof deck at least part of the lateral edges of neighboring shingles overlap. U.S. Pat. No. 2,106,396 discloses single layer asphalt coated shingles having serrated edges having edge and corner elements. When the shingles are applied to a roof deck, their lateral edges overlap. The edge and corner elements of the shingles may be utilized as guides for laying the elements of each shingle in proper relation to each other in each course and also for properly relating the elements in one course to those in a subjacent course.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,272,032 describes single layer asphalt roofing shingles with varying cross-sectional thickness to be arranged in offset overlapping courses, wherein the side edge portions of adjacent shingles in the same course overlap. The shingle has longitudinal zigzag edge contours, which shadow each other on either side of the shingle such that the width of the shingle is constant across the length of the shingle. When the courses are installed, the thicker portions of a subsequent shingle “nest” in the thinner portions of the previously installed shingle to provide the protection qualities of more heavily coated roofing material.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,687,701 discloses single layer tabbed asbestos cement roofing shingles comprising projections on the front and rear edges. When the shingles are applied to a roof deck, their lateral edges overlap. The shingles comprise projections which extend above and over the buttlap portion of a previous course when a subsequent course is installed. The overlapping and projections are intended to create a more dimensional appearance.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,919,823 discloses single layer asphalt roofing shingles. The shingles comprise various projections on the front edge. The shingles are installed such that their lateral edges overlap to create what is described as a “shadow effect” which will vary depending on the time of day.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,274,243 discloses a laminated asphalt roofing shingle to be arranged in overlapping courses to optically simulate tiles. The shingle has a buttlap portion with curved tile-like features and the left-most tile-like feature includes an overlap portion that extends over the adjoining edge of a neighboring shingle to hide the adjoining edge between the shingles.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,333,279 and 4,527,374 disclose strip or tabbed single layer asphalt shingles. The shingles comprise various edges at least one of which is an alignment edge. The shingles are overlapped using the alignment edge in order to achieve a desired pattern when the shingles are installed on a roof deck.
U.S. Pat. Appl. Publ. No. 2004/0182032 discloses a multi-layer laminate shingle with a reduced-width headlap portion. The shingle has a base layer and at least a second layer above the base layer. At one end of the shingle the base layer projects beyond the second layer while at the other end the second layer projects beyond the base layer. When the shingles are laid in a course along the roof, the projecting end of the second layer overlaps the projecting end of the base layer of the previously installed shingle, forming a shiplap joint over all or substantially all of the width of the shingle.
U.S. Pat. Appl. Publ. No. 2011/0185668 discloses a laminated roofing shingle system including a reduced-width headlap portion, wherein the roofing system comprises a plurality of courses, and wherein a trailing edge of a subsequently installed shingle in a course overlaps the leading edge of an adjacent previously installed shingle in the same course.
In addition to certain of the shingles discussed above, various shingles have employed non-straight edge contours. U.S. Pat. No. 1,732,403 discloses a tabbed strip shingle and method of forming the shingle. The shingles are cut from a sheet of roofing material, wherein the front edge profiles of the shingles are cut with a zigzag pattern to form complementary shingles. The tabs of the shingles are separated by parallel slots and have a generally triangular front edge with a small horizontal tip portion. When installed, the small horizontal tip portion of the tabs of shingles in a subsequently installed course align with the ends of the slots of shingles in a previously installed course. The shingles require approximately 225 ft2 of sheet material to cover a 100 ft2 of roof area.
U.S. Pat. No. 1,846,635 discloses a method of cutting so-called hexagonal strip shingles without waste from a parent sheet of prepared roofing. Each shingle has an exposed edge that defines projecting tongues having three sides of a hexagonal shape separated by recesses. When installed the projecting tongues match with the recesses of previously installed shingles, i.e., the projecting tongues have an end breadth equal to the breadth of the recesses in the buttlap. The shingles may also have a headlap with projections and recesses, wherein the end breadths of the headlap projections are equal to the headlap recesses and different from the tongue end breadths and buttlap recesses. U.S. Pat. No. 1,846,635 further discloses a formula for calculating the average exposed width of the shingle and that the shingle has a maximum width (“extreme width”) that is twice the average exposed width plus the desired overlap from a successively installed shingle.
U.S. Pat. Appl. Publ. No. 2003/0172611 discloses shingles having a headlap region and a visual feature region, wherein the visual feature region includes teeth and cutout spaces that are identical in shape and size, with respect to each other. When installed, an alternating pattern is achieved along a vertical line extending up the shingled roof between teeth and cutout spaces of the visual feature regions of overlapped, vertically adjacent shingles.
U.S. Pat. Appl. Publ. No. 2013/0160389 discloses shingles having a headlap portion with a non-straight longitudinal edge and a buttlap portion with a non-straight longitudinal edge, wherein the non-straight longitudinal edges do not shadow each other laterally across the shingle. U.S. Pat. Appl. Publ. No. 2013/0160389 further discloses a roofing system wherein at least a portion of the headlap portion of a shingle in a subsequently installed course overlaps at least a portion of the headlap portion of a shingle in a previously installed course and a maximum headlap overlap dimension is beneath the subsequently installed shingle laterally proximate the openings in the buttlap portion of the subsequently installed shingle. U.S. Pat. Appl. Publ. No. 2013/0160389 further discloses a method of making the shingles wherein the shingles are cut from a sheet of roofing material longitudinally along non-straight lines.
Each of the above-referenced patents and patent applications is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes within this application.
In accordance with the present invention, a roofing system is provided having a multiplicity of courses of roofing shingles having a reduced-width headlap portion wherein a lateral trailing edge of a shingle in a single course partially overlaps and partially abuts an adjacent previously installed shingle to form an interlocking edge between adjacent shingles, and wherein the lateral trailing edge includes a trailing edge projection having a weather edge, a rear edge, and a variable breadth that increases toward the rear edge of the trailing edge projection.
One embodiment of this invention pertains to a new asphalt containing roofing shingle that improves upon the utilization of materials required to make the shingle compared to prior art shingles while providing excellent water shedding and resistance to water infiltration under high wind conditions.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention pertains to a shingle, wherein the shingle has a trailing edge projection having a curved shape to dissipate wind impingements. When installed on a roof deck, the trailing edge projection forms at least part of a side-lap (or shiplap) region. The trailing edge projection in accordance with the invention greatly improves wind performance of the side-lap region.
A further preferred embodiment of the present invention pertains to a shingle, wherein the shingle has a leading edge projection and at least one leading abutment portion that, when installed on a roof deck, abut a trailing abutment portion of an adjacent subsequently installed shingle in the same course. The leading edge projection in accordance with the invention greatly improves resistance to water infiltration underneath a trailing lateral edge of the adjacent subsequently installed shingle.
In a preferred embodiment, a roofing system is provided comprising single-layer shingles having a headlap portion, a buttlap portion, a lateral leading edge, a lateral trailing edge, a straight longitudinal rear edge, and a non-straight longitudinal front edge, wherein the headlap portion has a headlap width that is less than a maximum buttlap width of the buttlap portion, wherein the lateral leading edge includes at least one leading abutting portion and a leading edge projection that extends away from the shingle, wherein the lateral trailing edge includes at least one trailing abutting portion and a trailing edge projection that extends away from the shingle, wherein the roofing system comprises a plurality of courses of the shingles, and wherein the lateral trailing edge of a subsequently installed shingle in a course of shingles partially abuts and partially overlaps the lateral leading edge of an adjacent previously installed shingle in the same course of shingles to form an interlocking edge between adjacent shingles in the same course of shingles, wherein the leading edge projection has a projected edge, a rear edge, and a variable breadth that increases toward the rear edge of the leading edge projection, wherein the trailing edge projection has a weather edge, a rear edge, and a variable breadth that increases toward the rear edge of the trailing edge projection, wherein the leading edge projection mirrors the trailing edge projection, and wherein the straight longitudinal rear edge comprises a leading portion and a trailing portion separated by a central portion, wherein the leading portion consists of the rear edge of the leading edge projection and the trailing portion consists of the rear edge of the trailing edge projection.
In another embodiment, the roofing system consists essentially of the shingles of the invention.
In a preferred embodiment, the lateral leading edge includes one leading abutting portion, wherein the lateral trailing edge includes one trailing abutting portion, wherein the interlocking edge comprises an abutment region defined by an abutment of the leading abutting portion and the trailing abutting portion of the adjacent shingles in the first course of shingles and a side-lap region defined by an overlap of the trailing edge projection and an underlap of the leading edge projection between the adjacent shingles in the first course of shingles
In a preferred embodiment, the at least one leading abutting portion includes a first leading portion and a second leading portion that are separated by the leading edge projection, the at least one trailing abutting portion includes a first trailing portion and a second trailing portion that are separated by the trailing edge projection, and the interlocking edge comprises a first abutment region defined by an abutment of the first leading portion and the first trailing portion of the adjacent shingles in the same course of shingles, a side-lap region defined by an overlap of the trailing edge projection and an underlap of the leading edge projection between the adjacent shingles in the same course of shingles, and a second abutment region defined by an abutment of the second leading portion and the second trailing portion of the adjacent shingles in the same course of shingles.
In a preferred embodiment, the trailing edge projection has a curved portion and a straight lateral portion. In a further preferred embodiment, the straight lateral portion has a constant breadth.
In another preferred embodiment, the trailing edge projection has a continuously curved profile. In a further preferred embodiment, the continuously curved profile is convex.
In a preferred embodiment, the variable breadth of the trailing edge projection includes a maximum breadth that is about 3 inches. In another preferred embodiment, the variable breadth of the trailing edge projection includes a maximum breadth that is about 2.5 inches.
In another preferred embodiment, the constant breadth of the straight lateral portion of the trailing edge projection is about equal to the maximum breadth of the trailing edge projection.
In another embodiment, the leading edge projection has a shape that does not mirror the trailing edge projection.
In a preferred embodiment, the leading edge projection has a maximum breadth that is about equal to the maximum breadth of the trailing edge projection.
In a preferred embodiment, the trailing edge projection has a height that spans at least a portion of the headlap portion and at least a portion of the buttlap portion.
In a preferred embodiment, the leading edge projection has a height that is about equal to the height of the trailing edge projection.
In preferred embodiments with one abutment region, the abutment region may have a height of about 3 inches and in another preferred embodiment may be 1.5 inches or 1 inch. In preferred embodiments with two abutment regions, the first abutment region and the second abutment region of the interlocking edge each have a height of about 2 inches. In another preferred embodiment, the first abutment region has a height of about 1 inch and the second abutment region has a height of about 1½ inches. In another preferred embodiment, the first abutment region has a height of about 3 inches and the second abutment region has a height of about 1.5 inches.
In a preferred embodiment, the side-lap region has a maximum breadth that is about 6 inches or about 5 inches.
In a preferred embodiment, the non-straight longitudinal front edge includes a central horizontal portion, a left horizontal portion, a right horizontal portion, a first transition portion, and a second transition portion, wherein the central horizontal portion extends further away from the shingle than the left horizontal portion and the right horizontal portion, and wherein the first transition portion is situated between the left horizontal portion and the central horizontal portion and the second transition portion is situated between the central horizontal portion and the right horizontal portion.
In a preferred embodiment, the shingles further comprise an alignment means. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the alignment means includes sealant strips and the left and right horizontal portions of the non-straight longitudinal front edge.
In a preferred embodiment, the shingles are cut from a sheet of roofing material and the shingles provide a coverage area such that the shingles required to cover 100 ft2 of a roof deck are made from less than 200 ft2 of the sheet of roofing material. In particularly preferred embodiments, the shingles required to cover 100 ft2 of the roof deck are made from about 168 to about 198 ft2 of the sheet of roofing material, and more preferably from about 171 ft2 or about 181 ft2 or about 186 ft2 or about 198 ft2 of the sheet of roofing material. In another preferred embodiment, the shingles required to cover 100 ft2 of the roof deck are made from less than 168 ft2 of the sheet of roofing material.
In a preferred embodiment, the roofing system of the invention provides a reduction in water infiltration area compared to a roofing system employing traditional 3-tab shingles as measured according to Miami Dade TAS 100 wind-driven test by at least 10%. In a further preferred embodiment, the reduction in water infiltration area is by at least 15%. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the reduction in water infiltration area is by at least 20%.
The roofing system of the invention is an improvement of roofing systems known in the art, wherein the improvements are providing roofing shingles having a reduced-width headlap and a unique shape and/or dimensions, which provide an increased coverage for each shingle of the invention compared to prior art shingles and allows for increased utilization of materials necessary to make the shingles of the invention compared to the amount of material necessary to make traditional, prior art shingles.
A further improvement is providing roofing shingles with interlocking edges that provide alignment means upon installation and increased resistance to infiltration by wind-driven rain. A further improvement is providing roofing shingles having a trailing edge projection with variable breadth that when installed on a roof deck in a side-lap fashion dissipates wind impingements at or near the side-lap region.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures, but which are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims, in which:
The preferred embodiments of the present invention and its advantages are best understood by referring to
The first embodiment of the present invention, which relates to single-layer roofing shingles having a trailing edge projection with variable breadth that, when installed in a side-lap (or shiplap) fashion, dissipates wind-impingements at or near the side-lap, will now be described in greater detail by referring to the drawings that accompany the present application.
A shingle 10 incorporating one embodiment of the present invention is shown in
Referring to
In another preferred embodiment, trailing edge projection 100 may be situated between a first trailing portion 74A and second trailing portion 73A. See, e.g.,
Referring back to
To improve wind resistance, an edge of the side-lap shingle (i.e., the weather edge 103 of the trailing edge projection 100) should be designed in such a way as to optimize the aerodynamic performance of the shingle geometry, such that the propensity of wind uplift at the side-lap corner (or trailing projection 100) is highly reduced or eliminated. An example may comprise a side-lap edge (or a trailing projection 100) having a curved shape that dissipates wind impingements and greatly improves wind performance of a side-lap area.
Leading edge projection 110 has a projected edge 113, a rear edge 114, a maximum breadth 111, and a height 112, and is situated behind a leading portion 74B. Preferably, the maximum breadth 111 may be between 1 and 5 inches, and more preferably about 3 inches or about 2.5 inches or about 2 inches. Preferably, height 112 is between 50% and 93% of the width (w) of shingle 10, and more preferably between 70% and 85% of shingle width (w) of shingle 10. In particular preferred embodiments, the height 102 may be about 66% or about 77% or about 79% or about 81% of the width (w) of shingle 10. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the maximum breadth 111 of the leading edge projection 110 is about equal to the maximum breadth 101 of the trailing edge projection 100 and the height 112 of the leading edge projection 110 is about equal to the height 102 of the trailing edge projection 100. In a preferred embodiment, the leading edge projection 110 may have a variable breadth. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the leading edge projection 110 has a shape that mirrors the shape of trailing edge projection 100. It is also contemplated that the leading edge projection 110 may have a continuously curved and concave profile (not shown). It is further contemplated that the leading edge projection 110 does not have a shape that mirrors the shape the trailing edge projection 100, e.g., the trailing edge projection 100 may have curved profile or partially curved profile and the leading edge projection 110 may have a rectangular shape.
In another preferred embodiment, leading edge projection 110 may be situated between a first leading portion 74B and second leading portion 73B. See, e.g.,
Headlap portion 2 has a width measured laterally across shingle 10 that is less than the width of the buttlap portion 3 measured laterally across shingle 10 defining a reduced-width headlap. Preferably, the width of the headlap portion 2 may be between 15% and 50% of the width (w) of the shingle 10, and more preferably about 25% or about 38% or about 42% of the width (w) of the shingle 10. Headlap portion 2 may include sealant strips 6.
As depicted in the embodiment shown in
As depicted in
An important feature of the present invention is the lateral trailing edge 4 comprising at least one trailing abutting portion 74A and a trailing edge projection 100 having a weather edge 103, a rear edge 104, and a variable breadth that increases toward the rear edge of the trailing edge projection. As depicted in
Preferably, as depicted in
Referring back to
In another preferred embodiment, as depicted in
Preferably, shingle 10 of the invention further comprises an alignment means. As depicted in
Referring to
Although the embodiments depicted in the accompanying figures have sealant strips 6 on the upper surface of the shingles, it is contemplated that, alternatively, sealant strips may be affixed to the underside surface of the shingles proximate to the longitudinal front edge 7 (not shown).
In a particularly preferred embodiment of the roofing system of the invention, shingles of the invention may be installed such that a minimum of 4 inches of a side-lap overlap exists at any water entry point. However, it is contemplated that the minimum side-lap overlap may be 2 inches at any water entry point.
For one embodiment of the present invention, the shingle 10 may be formed from a fiberglass mat (not shown) with an asphalt coating on both sides of the mat. If desired, the present invention may also be used with shingles formed from organic felt or other types of base material, including but not limited to synthetic mats or synthetic glass/hybrid mats having an appropriate coating. Nonlimiting embodiments of coatings include asphalt and modified bituminous coatings based on atactic polypropylene (APP), styrene-butadiane-styrene (SBS), styrene-ethylene-butadiene-styrene (SEBS), amorphous polyalpha olefin (APAO), thermoplastic polyolefin (TPO), synthetic rubber, their combinations or other asphaltic modifiers.
Referring to
An important feature of the present invention includes providing a shingle having a reduced-width headlap portion. For preferred embodiments of the present invention, headlap portion 2 may have a width that is about 25% or about 38% or about 42% of the width (w) of shingle 10 of the invention. However, as noted above, the headlap portion 2 may have a width that is between 15% and 50% of the width (w) of shingle 10 of the invention.
Another important feature of the present invention includes providing a shingle having interlocking edges. For the embodiments of the present invention shown in the instant figures, the lateral trailing edge 4 and the lateral leading edge 5 of adjacent installed shingles in the same course partially overlap, partially underlap, and partially abut, thereby forming an interlocking edge between the adjacent installed shingles. However, other forms of interlocking edges are contemplated including, but not limited to, cutouts or holes in various geometric shapes and their combinations.
Another important feature of the present invention includes providing a shingle with a side-lap edge (a trailing edge projection 100) having a variable breadth that increases toward a rear edge of the trailing edge projection. For the embodiment of the present invention shown in the instant figures, trailing edge projection 100 has a straight portion 102x and a curved portion 102y. However, other shapes and dimensions for the trailing edge projection 100 that dissipate wind impingements underneath the side-lap edge are contemplated and within the scope of the present invention, e.g., embodiments of the present invention may have a trailing edge projection having a continuously curved shape.
The reduced-width headlap portion and the unique shape and/or dimensions of the shingle of the present invention are desirable because they allow for an improved utilization of materials that are required to make the shingles. In preferred embodiments of this invention, the shingles and roof system of the present invention improve the material utilization over traditional, prior art 3-tab shingles preferably by at least 15% (less than 200 ft2 of material needed for 100 ft2 of coverage), and more preferably by about 23% (about 186 ft2 of material needed for 100 ft2 of coverage), or about 25% (about 181 ft2 of material sheet needed for 100 ft2 of coverage), or about 29% (about 171 ft2 of material needed for 100 ft2 of coverage).
The interlocking edges of the present invention are desirable for improving alignment upon installation and increased resistance to water infiltration.
The trailing edge projection 100 having a variable breadth that increases toward a rear edge of the trailing edge projection of the present invention is desirable for increasing resistance to wind impingements at or near the side-lap region.
The interlocking edges and the trailing edge projection 100 of the present invention are further desirable because they allow for improved weather performance. In preferred embodiments of this invention, the shingles and roofing system of the present invention reduce the % area of water infiltration over traditional, prior art 3-tab shingles by at least 10%, and more preferably by at least 15%, and yet more preferably by 20%. The % area of water infiltration is determined by the area of water wetting in the underlayment upon testing per Miami Dade TAS 100 wind-driven rain test.
Shingles having length (l) and width (w) dimensions of 36″×12″, a reduced-width headlap and a trailing edge projection in accordance with the invention and a straight front longitudinal edge were prepared by following a typical reduced-headlap shingle production. A 4′×4′ test roof deck was constructed, wherein shingles of the invention were installed in accordance with the invention. The interlocking edge between adjacent shingles in the same course included a side-lap region having a maximum length of 6″ and a first abutment region and a second abutment region each having a height of 2″. The weather edge of the side-lap included a curved edge designed to provide wind dynamics for uplift reduction. A 4′×4′ control roof deck was constructed, wherein commercially available 3-tab shingles (Royal Sovereign shingle from GAF Corporation, Dallas, Tex.) were installed. Table 1 (below) lists the amount of shingle material needed per 100 ft2 based upon the deck construction calculation. As will be appreciated, the shingles of the invention have significantly better material utilization with an approximately 33% reduction in material usage comparing to the prior art, control 3-tab shingles.
Both decks were then subjected to the Miami Dade TAS 100 wind-driven rain test, which includes wind-driven rain conditions at 35, 70, 90, and 110 mph wind. After the test, the shingles were removed and the water infiltration was observed. The amounts of wet area were recorded and estimated to within ±5% of the total area, and listed in Table 1 (below). As will be appreciated, the shingles of the invention can significantly reduce the amount of water infiltration when compared to traditional, prior art 3-tab shingles.
Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 14/550,468, filed on Nov. 21, 2014, entitled “Roofing Shingle System and Shingles for Use Therein,” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes within this application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
433279 | Fairchild | Jul 1890 | A |
1295360 | Overbury | Feb 1919 | A |
D56106 | Russell | Aug 1920 | S |
1442614 | Hooker | Jan 1923 | A |
1463632 | Severns | Jul 1923 | A |
1513940 | Smith et al. | Nov 1924 | A |
D68552 | Sjodahl | Oct 1925 | S |
1584343 | Abraham | May 1926 | A |
1587017 | MacInnes | Jun 1926 | A |
1601735 | Harris | Oct 1926 | A |
1604339 | Cumfer | Oct 1926 | A |
1619599 | Cumfer | Mar 1927 | A |
1633474 | Busha | Jun 1927 | A |
1641858 | McCarthy | Sep 1927 | A |
1655885 | Adair | Jan 1928 | A |
1656434 | Gietz | Jan 1928 | A |
D74669 | Fife | Mar 1928 | S |
D75612 | Cotner | Jun 1928 | S |
1688917 | Busha | Oct 1928 | A |
D76843 | Topping | Nov 1928 | S |
1698891 | Overbury | Jan 1929 | A |
1555441 | Sjodahl | Sep 1929 | A |
1732403 | Harris et al. | Oct 1929 | A |
1741539 | Moore | Dec 1929 | A |
1756741 | Harshberger | Apr 1930 | A |
1760873 | Kirschbraun | Jun 1930 | A |
D81768 | Topping | Aug 1930 | S |
D83704 | Stark | Mar 1931 | S |
1828222 | Clow | Oct 1931 | A |
D85639 | Finley | Dec 1931 | S |
1842761 | McCarthy | Jan 1932 | A |
1843370 | Overbury | Feb 1932 | A |
1846635 | Finley | Feb 1932 | A |
1851088 | Duncan | Mar 1932 | A |
1860899 | Miller | May 1932 | A |
1862852 | Harshberger | Jun 1932 | A |
1871646 | Abraham | Aug 1932 | A |
1894614 | Wettlaufer | Jan 1933 | A |
D89783 | Moone | May 1933 | S |
1934666 | Goslin | Nov 1933 | A |
1945485 | Harshberger | Jan 1934 | A |
1955699 | Moffit | Apr 1934 | A |
1956732 | Schulz | May 1934 | A |
D92504 | Topping | Jun 1934 | S |
1968426 | Rowe | Jul 1934 | A |
1975487 | Topping | Oct 1934 | A |
D93824 | Harshberger | Nov 1934 | S |
1983936 | Finley | Dec 1934 | A |
2000226 | Fry | May 1935 | A |
2006417 | Topping | Jul 1935 | A |
2018722 | Humphrey | Oct 1935 | A |
2027029 | Eckert | Jan 1936 | A |
D99248 | Piazza | Apr 1936 | S |
2068118 | Topping | Jan 1937 | A |
2078998 | Black | May 1937 | A |
D107209 | Batell | Nov 1937 | S |
2099131 | Miller | Nov 1937 | A |
2106396 | Topping | Jan 1938 | A |
2113644 | Bollaert | Apr 1938 | A |
2132999 | Topping | Oct 1938 | A |
2161440 | Venrick | Jun 1939 | A |
2205679 | Ames, Jr. | Jun 1940 | A |
2219450 | Koenig | Oct 1940 | A |
2257152 | Black | Sep 1941 | A |
2272032 | Brown | Feb 1942 | A |
2335493 | Drinkall | Nov 1943 | A |
2411308 | Washburn | Nov 1946 | A |
2460353 | Killingsworth | Feb 1949 | A |
2487593 | Rowe | Nov 1949 | A |
2687701 | Abraham | Aug 1954 | A |
2699129 | Abraham | Jan 1955 | A |
2756699 | Lockwood | Jul 1956 | A |
2808010 | Rannikko | Oct 1957 | A |
2858777 | Schuetz | Nov 1958 | A |
2867180 | May | Jan 1959 | A |
2884878 | Abraham | May 1959 | A |
3127701 | Jastrzemski | Apr 1964 | A |
3217870 | Davis et al. | Nov 1965 | A |
3283463 | Powell | Nov 1966 | A |
3377761 | Skelton, Jr. | Apr 1968 | A |
3407556 | Leibrook | Oct 1968 | A |
3638388 | Crookston | Feb 1972 | A |
3919223 | Zmojdzin et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3919823 | Bradley | Nov 1975 | A |
3921358 | Bettoli | Nov 1975 | A |
4188763 | Thiis-Evensen | Feb 1980 | A |
4195461 | Thiis-Evensen | Apr 1980 | A |
4274243 | Corbin et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4333279 | Corbin et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4434589 | Freiborg | Mar 1984 | A |
4499702 | Turner | Feb 1985 | A |
4527374 | Corbin | Jul 1985 | A |
4587785 | Rohner | May 1986 | A |
4637191 | Smith | Jan 1987 | A |
4666226 | Legrand et al. | May 1987 | A |
4856251 | Buck | Aug 1989 | A |
D317506 | Jenkins et al. | Jun 1991 | S |
D326330 | Klein | May 1992 | S |
5195290 | Hulett | Mar 1993 | A |
5232530 | Malmquist et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5239802 | Robinson | Aug 1993 | A |
5421134 | Hannah et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
D366124 | Hannah et al. | Jan 1996 | S |
5495654 | Goodhart | Mar 1996 | A |
5657603 | Goodhart | Aug 1997 | A |
D388195 | Hannah et al. | Dec 1997 | S |
5799459 | Covert | Sep 1998 | A |
5816014 | Tzeng et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
D400981 | Bondoc et al. | Nov 1998 | S |
5853858 | Bondoc | Dec 1998 | A |
5860263 | Sieling | Jan 1999 | A |
D406361 | Bondoc et al. | Mar 1999 | S |
D406665 | Bondoc et al. | Mar 1999 | S |
5939169 | Bondoc et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6014847 | Phillips | Jan 2000 | A |
D426002 | Bondoc et al. | May 2000 | S |
D435671 | Phillips | Dec 2000 | S |
6190754 | Bondoc et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6361851 | Sieling | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6367222 | Timbrel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
D480485 | Phillips | Oct 2003 | S |
D482141 | Rodrigues et al. | Nov 2003 | S |
D484992 | Rodrigues et al. | Jan 2004 | S |
6708456 | Kiik et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6920730 | Becker et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6990779 | Kiik et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7204063 | Kandalgaonkar | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7510622 | Kalkanoglu et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7607275 | Elliott et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7775008 | King | Aug 2010 | B2 |
D658787 | Westfall et al. | May 2012 | S |
D666745 | Rodrigues et al. | Sep 2012 | S |
D666747 | Rodrigues | Sep 2012 | S |
D670407 | Leitch | Nov 2012 | S |
D670408 | Leitch | Nov 2012 | S |
D670409 | Leitch | Nov 2012 | S |
D670825 | Leitch | Nov 2012 | S |
D670826 | Leitch | Nov 2012 | S |
D670827 | Leitch | Nov 2012 | S |
D674515 | Jenkins | Jan 2013 | S |
D695925 | Ray et al. | Dec 2013 | S |
9057194 | Jenkins et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9242432 | Harrington et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
20030110729 | Waggoner et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030172611 | Coco et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040079042 | Elliott | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040172909 | Gabbard | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040182032 | Koschitzky | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20070068108 | Kiik et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20090100788 | Gabbard | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090151288 | Kalkanoglu | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090229210 | Binkley et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20110185668 | Kiik et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20130160389 | Leitch | Jun 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
CertainTeed Shingle Applicator's Manual: Presidential Shake and Presidential Shake TL, http://www.certainteed.com/resources/PresidentialShakeTLInstall.pdf (undated). |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,902, filed Mar. 13, 2015 (drawings attached). |
Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/520,321, filed Mar. 13, 2015 (drawings attached). |
Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/520,322, filed Mar. 13, 2015 (drawings attached). |
Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/520,324, filed Mar. 13, 2015 (drawings attached). |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/947,220, filed Nov. 20, 2015 (drawings attached). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160145869 A1 | May 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14550468 | Nov 2014 | US |
Child | 14669538 | US |