Various low slope roofing systems have been developed for buildings and the like. Such low slope roofing systems commonly include a structural deck that is metal or concrete. The deck may then be covered with a layer of insulation, and the insulation is then covered with a waterproof membrane. Wind acting on the building structure may cause a substantial uplift force acting on the roof membrane. The membrane in known systems may be secured utilizing ballast such as gravel to prevent uplift of the membrane. Alternately, the membrane may be adhesively bonded with hot asphalt, or flammable solvent based contact bond adhesives. Other known systems utilize a two component, sprayable polyurethane foam adhesive primarily composed of di-isocyanate and polyol compounds. Such polyurethane foam arrangements utilize a spray gun that mixes the components and sprays the liquid mixture on the substrate. The membrane is immediately applied and the adhesive mixture then expands, or foams, and solidifies to form a bond. However, such polyurethane foam adhesive arrangements may suffer from numerous drawbacks. For example, the spraying of the polyurethane adhesive produces a potentially hazardous aerosol, requiring use of protective suits, respiratory protection, or the like in order to protect those spraying the adhesive and applying the roof membrane. Furthermore, inclement weather conditions also may create problems with such systems due to high wind or low temperatures. The spraying equipment required to spray such foam is generally quite large and heavy, thereby requiring substantial effort to position the equipment on the building roof. Such equipment also includes numerous components such that it is also quite expensive and often difficult to maintain.
Flammable, solvent based contact bond adhesives require that adhesive be spread on both bonding surfaces by brush, roller, or spray, and that they also remain in an unassembled condition until the majority of the solvent evaporates into the atmosphere. The coated substrates are then assembled and compressed with a metal roller to set the bond. Such applications of roof membrane are labor intensive, time consuming, and present certain occupational hazards to personnel breathing hazardous solvent vapors. Such “solvent release” type adhesives also contaminate the atmosphere with volatile organic compounds. The solvents may also become trapped below the membrane, causing blisters and delamination requiring repair.
Such existing polyurethane foam adhesive systems and solvent based adhesive systems may provide sufficient bond strength to meet roofing industry standards. However, building roof structures may experience uplift forces exceeding such standards, such that substantial damage may be incurred, even by buildings that meet standards. In addition to the damage to the building, items within the building such as stored products or other inventory, production equipment, office equipment, computers, and the like may also suffer serious damage. Due to the large numbers of buildings utilizing membrane type roof structures, such damage can be extremely costly, especially in geographic areas that experience hurricanes or other high wind conditions.
Although moisture curing adhesives have been used to bond structural components such as capping, metal edges, skylights, roof insulation and the like, it is not believed that such adhesives have heretofore been utilized to bond waterproof roof membranes to low slope roof substrates.
One aspect of the present invention is a roof substrate (or board) for covering a structural roof (deck) substrate. The roof structure includes a waterproof membrane having a layer of “fleece” (non-woven textile) material disposed on a first side thereof. The roof structure also includes a moisture curing, substantially non-volatile polyether based adhesive disposed on at least a portion of the roof substrate (board). At least some of the adhesive is disposed within the fleece material to permit bonding of the waterproof membrane to a roof substrate of a low slope roof of the building structure.
Another aspect of the present invention is a roof deck structure including a rigid low slope roof structure adapted to be supported at least in part by the walls of a building. The low slope roof structure has a rigid roof substrate, and the roof deck structure includes a waterproof membrane having a layer of fleece material disposed on a first side thereof. The roof deck structure further includes a moisture curing, substantially non-volatile polyether based adhesive disposed on at least a portion of the first side of the waterproof membrane. At least some of the adhesive is disposed within the fleece material and bonds the waterproof membrane to the roof substrate.
Yet another aspect of the present invention is a method of securing a waterproof membrane to a low slope roof structure. The method includes applying a plurality of beads of a moisture curing adhesive onto the lowest slope roof structure. A waterproof membrane is positioned over at least a portion of the lowest slope roof structure in contact with the moisture curing adhesive. The moisture curing adhesive is activated by exposure to atmospheric moisture thus polymerizing the adhesive and securely bonding the waterproof membrane to the lowest slope roof structure.
These and other features, advantages, and objects of the present invention will be further understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art by reference to the following specification, claims, and appended drawings.
For purposes of description herein, the terms “upper,” “lower,” “right,” “left,” rear, “front,” “vertical,” “horizontal,” and derivatives thereof shall relate to the invention as oriented in
As illustrated in
In a preferred embodiment, the fleece backed membrane 5 includes a layer of EDPM rubber on an upper surface to provide a waterproof layer, and the lower side includes a non-woven polyester matting. The EDPM layer is preferably about 40-70 mils, and the fleece-like matting has a thickness of about 40-80 mils secured thereto. Such fleece backed membranes are manufactured by Carlisle Syntec Company, of Carlisle, Pa. Other fleece-backed membranes include Sarnafil PVC membrane, and GAF TPO membrane.
In a preferred embodiment, moisture curing adhesive 7 is designated as “ROOF ASSEMBLY ADHESIVE” that is available from Chem Link Corporation of Kalamazoo, Mich. This adhesive does not generate toxic vapors, and also does not require immediate application of the membrane as with existing two part polyurethane foam sprayed systems. This adhesive can be used at temperatures below 40°, and, because it is extruded directly to the rigid deck, it is not adversely affected by wind or the like during application. The rheology (consistency) of this adhesive is designed to produce, upon extrusion, a round bead that maintains its profile (shape) after application to a rigid surface. In a preferred embodiment, the adhesive 7 has a viscosity of about 200,000 to 300,000 centipoise. This viscosity level permits extrusion, yet provides high profile beads. Viscosities as low as about 100,000 centipoise or as high as about 500,000 centipoise may be utilized. Such high profile beads of adhesive improve contact and transfer of the adhesive to the flexible membrane surface and bridge gaps that may exist as a result of roughness or irregularity in the rigid surface. Furthermore, this adhesive develops a tensile strength of about 200 pounds per square foot, and therefore provides a very strong bond between the membrane 5 and the roof substrate 4. Thus, the roof structure of the present invention is very strong and resistant to wind uplift forces that would otherwise cause the membrane 5 to separate from the substrate 4. Prior to application of the adhesive 7, the roof substrate 4 is cleaned as required to ensure that it is free of oil, dirt, or loose debris. Also, the roof substrate 4 must be relatively dry. However, extensive, time consuming treatment such as blasting, primers, chemical treatments and the like used with existing polyurethane foam systems are not required when utilizing the Roof Assembly Adhesive according to the present invention.
With reference to
The moisture curing adhesive, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of this invention, comprises a silyl-terminated polymer, and pigments that impart viscosity and mechanically reinforce the cured adhesive. The adhesive also includes a plasticizer to impart elastomeric properties to the cured adhesive, and a thixotropic material that imparts viscosity and maintains the shape of the adhesive bead after extrusion. An antioxidant compound in the adhesive protects the polymer from thermal degradation, aging, and prolonged exposure to oxygen, and a catalyst promotes a polymerization reaction upon exposure to moisture. Adhesion promoters in the adhesive react with construction material surfaces forming permanent a chemical bond.
Examples of silyl-terminated polymers that may be used include silylated polyurethane, silylated polyethers, silylated acrylates, and sylylated polyesters. The silylated polymers, or silyl-terminated polymers of this invention include two or more reactive silyl groups, with alpha, omegatelechelic silane-terminated polymers being preferred.
An example of a suitable sylyl terminated polymer that may be used is an oxyalkylene polymer having at least one reactive silyl group at each end of the polymer molecule. The backbone of the silyl-terminated polymer has repeating units represented by the formula: —R—O— wherein R represents a divalent organic group. A straight or branched alklene group containing 1 to 14 carbon atoms is preferable. More preferably straight or branched alkylene groups containing 2 to 4 carbon atoms are utilized. Especially preferred are polypropylene oxide backbones, polyethylene oxide backbones oxide backbones, and copolyethylene oxide/polypropylene oxide backbones. Other repeating units may include, but are not limited to —CH2O—O—, —CH2CH(CH3)O—, —CH2CH(C2H5)O—, —CH2C(CH3)2O—, CH2CH2CH2CH2O— and the like.
The reactive silyl group contained in the silyl-terminated polymers may be represented by the formula:
—[Si(R2)2-a(X)aO]p—Si(R3)3-b(X)b
wherein R2 and R3 are the same or different and each represents an alkyl group containing 1 to 20 carbon atoms. An aryl group containing 6 to 20 carbon atoms, an aralkyl group containing 7 to 20 carbon atoms, or a triorganosiloxy group of the formula (F4)3SiO— (wherein R4 independently represents a hydrocarbon group containing 1 to 20 carbon atoms).
The following examples illustrate the adhesive utilized for the present invention in further detail, but do not limit the scope of this invention. An example of a moisture curable adhesive composition in accordance with one aspect of this invention was prepared by mixing the following ingredients under process conditions that protect the compound from exposure to atmospheric moisture. For example, processing may be done under a vacuum, or under a dry nitrogen atmosphere.
Another example of a moisture curing adhesive composition in accordance with this invention was prepared by mixing the following ingredients in a moisture free atmosphere.
The above formulations exhibit fast setting properties, adhesion and bond strength and rheological properties sufficient to install fleece-back waterproof membranes and most non-fleece-backed membrane under field roofing conditions.
The sheer strength of both compounds tested on wood substrates under identical conditions were in excess of 200 pounds per square foot.
Resistance to wind uplift is tested at Underwriters Laboratory in accordance with test method UL 1897. The testing device used in this test is a 10′×10′ table upon which a roof deck is installed. A complete roof assembly is constructed on the deck, including the roof membrane. A steel cupola is placed over the roof assembly and sealed at the perimeter to prevent air leaks. The atmosphere in the sealed cupola is reduced thus applying a vertical lifting force over the surface of the roof membrane. The vacuum force applied to the test surface is measured in inches of water and translated into pounds per square foot. Typical wind uplift performance meeting most roofing industry standards is 90 pounds per square foot.
Three tests were run using 8′×8′ Underwriters Laboratory UL 1879 type table with the following roof construction. Fluted steel deck, “B” type covered with two inch thick polyisocyanurate insulation board (Atlas Insulation) bonded to the steel with parallel ¼″ diameter beads of Roof Assembly Adhesive applied to the steel at six inch intervals. Fiberglass reinforced gypsum board (Dens-Deck) was then bonded to the insulation with parallel ⅛″ diameter beads of Roof Assembly Adhesive applied to the insulation at two inch intervals. A PVC fleece-backed waterproof membrane was then bonded to the gypsum board using ⅛″ diameter beads of Roof Assembly Adhesive applied at two inch intervals.
Each test assembly was allowed to cure at room temperature for three days. The three tables were tested to destruction with the following results: 165 pounds per square foot, 185 pounds per square foot and 205 pounds per square foot. These results are substantially better than prior solvent and polyurethane foam systems. In all the test assemblies the mode of failure was a complete removal of the fiberglass facing on the gypsum board. No adhesive failure occurred within any of the assemblies. Variability in the three tests were attributed to variation in the surface strength of the gypsum board substrates. Each test roof substantially exceeded the performance standard of the roofing industry.
The roofing system and method of the present invention provide a low slope roof structure that is very resistant to wind uplift forces and damage that would otherwise result from such wind forces. Furthermore, the moisture curing adhesive according to the present invention is not hazardous to the workers installing the roof, and the moisture cure adhesive can be applied at temperatures as low as 30° F. Significantly, the adhesive composition and roof system according to the present invention may be used in communities having laws that prohibit or restrict the use of construction materials that release solvent (volatile organic compounds) into the atmosphere. Also, extensive treatment of the roof substrate (e.g. concrete deck) to which the membrane is being bonded is not required. Rather, a relatively simple cleaning operation is sufficient for most applications, such that extensive preparation, treatment and the like is avoided.
In the foregoing description, it will be readily appreciated by those skilled in the art that modifications may be made to the invention without departing from the concepts disclosed herein. Such modifications are to be considered as included in the following claims, unless these claims by their language expressly state otherwise.
The present application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/061,545, filed on Feb. 1, 2002, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 6,679,018, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2667131 | Clarvoe et al. | Jan 1954 | A |
3468086 | Warner | Sep 1969 | A |
3632557 | Brode et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3763614 | Hyde et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3900102 | Hurst | Aug 1975 | A |
3971184 | Van Wagoner | Jul 1976 | A |
4141187 | Graves | Feb 1979 | A |
4393634 | McDermott et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4445306 | Schauffele | May 1984 | A |
4498267 | Beck | Feb 1985 | A |
4507437 | Kato et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4511626 | Schumacher | Apr 1985 | A |
4539359 | Kato et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4559263 | Roodvoets | Dec 1985 | A |
4578417 | Furukawa et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4588637 | Chiu | May 1986 | A |
4608792 | Gerber | Sep 1986 | A |
4640730 | Streets et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4677800 | Roodvoets | Jul 1987 | A |
4693923 | McGroarty et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4719723 | Van Wagoner | Jan 1988 | A |
4737213 | Paeglis et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4742119 | Close | May 1988 | A |
4747247 | Petersen et al. | May 1988 | A |
4852323 | Kartfilt | Aug 1989 | A |
4860514 | Kelly | Aug 1989 | A |
4894426 | Baghdachi et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4910059 | Sancaktar | Mar 1990 | A |
4954598 | Baghdachi et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4965119 | Sancaktar | Oct 1990 | A |
4996803 | Karrfalt et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
4996812 | Venable | Mar 1991 | A |
5097053 | Baghdachi et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5216053 | Jones et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5227434 | Katz | Jul 1993 | A |
5227442 | Babu et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5242727 | Briddell et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5272224 | Baghdachi et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5296561 | Babu et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5298572 | Katz | Mar 1994 | A |
5319044 | Jung et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5319050 | Kimura et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5368943 | Baghdachi et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5397648 | Babu et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5428931 | Ragsdale | Jul 1995 | A |
5447006 | Zenor | Sep 1995 | A |
5456785 | Venable | Oct 1995 | A |
5572843 | Jordan | Nov 1996 | A |
5620554 | Venable | Apr 1997 | A |
5643399 | Venable | Jul 1997 | A |
5721311 | Oien | Feb 1998 | A |
5737897 | Naipawer, III | Apr 1998 | A |
5753747 | Oien | May 1998 | A |
5767197 | Fukatsu et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768838 | Georgeau | Jun 1998 | A |
5784846 | Godschalx | Jul 1998 | A |
5800891 | Wasitis | Sep 1998 | A |
5872203 | Wen et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5895536 | Starr et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6008305 | Wang et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6023906 | Folkersen | Feb 2000 | A |
6048579 | Wang et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6077896 | Yano et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6101767 | Georgeau | Aug 2000 | A |
6103356 | Messenger | Aug 2000 | A |
6103850 | Reichel et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106941 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6124387 | Wang et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6130268 | Murray | Oct 2000 | A |
6151855 | Campbell | Nov 2000 | A |
6193826 | Starr et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206991 | Starr | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6253530 | Price et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258878 | Bahadur et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271333 | Okuhira | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6291571 | Fisher | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297324 | Briddell et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6305143 | Streets et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314700 | Starr | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6355127 | Mahdi et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
RE37683 | Briddell et al. | Apr 2002 | E |
6401925 | Wang et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6465104 | Krebs et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6491471 | Susinskas | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505455 | Georgeau | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6544909 | Venkataswamy et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6579924 | Georgeau et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6581348 | Hunter, Jr. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6679018 | Georgeau et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6701685 | Rippey | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6742313 | Ritland et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764733 | Clarke | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6769215 | Carkner | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6871472 | Folkersen | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6938386 | Ritland et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7169719 | Mehta et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
20020086942 | Fujita et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030209305 | Smith et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20050107499 | Georgeau et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0037534 | Jun 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Exhibit A is a description of a prior art M-1 structural adhesive/sealant offered for sale at least as early as Jan. 1, 2001. |
Exhibit B is a specification of a prior art M-1 structural adhesive/sealant offered for sale at least as early as Jan. 1, 2001. |
Exhibit C is a Material Safety Data Sheet of a prior art M-1 structural adhesive/sealant offered for sale at least as early as Jan. 1, 2001. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040107662 A1 | Jun 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10061545 | Feb 2002 | US |
Child | 10726341 | US |