ROOFTOP PERIMETER SAFETY SYSTEM

Abstract

A safety barrier system for use in roofing and other roof-top projects requiring perimeter safety fencing or railing. Multiple, adjustable components allow for separation of support members from a rooftop deck for application of roofing material, adaptation for installations involving a varieties of rooftop perimeter configurations and obstacles, and, in some embodiments, later reinstallation without requirements for reinstallation of building side anchor components.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Field of The Invention

The present invention relates to safety barriers for use in roofing and construction contexts.

Background Information

Measures for worker fall prevention is a significant aspect of planning, outfitting, and budgeting for building construction and repair projects, including roofing and re-roofing.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, in 2014 alone, 660 U.S. workers suffered workplace falls. Part of this number represents 14% of all fatal workplace injuries (including from such sources as transportation-related injuries, equipment-related injury, etc). This, despite the current measures (government regulations, insurance company requirements, and property owner and/or contractor requirements) to limit fall-related dangers. Clearly, roofing-related projects involving high rise buildings and (according to regulations, even working at heights as low as 6 feet above ground level), represent significant dangers in the fall-related realm.

Currently, a variety of regulations require (at a minimum) certain measures at worksites for reducing fall-related dangers. These include (among others) fencing or railing systems that are attached to a building's roof decking, at least during most of the roofing operation. A serious draw-back of existing rooftop fencing or railing systems is that they overlay, and preclude access for roofing materials application to much of the roof decking itself in the areas near roof perimeters. Only after they are removed, can the previously occupied surface area be completed. Each time a roof is to be re-surfaced, the fencing or railing system must be replaced, with the same inconveniences and expenses repeated. This also means that a significant portion of the roofing surface area must be treated, only after portions of the safety barriers are removed, thereby requiring further time, incremental roofing steps, additional, alternative safety measures, and additional project time.

There is a compelling need, particularly in the commercial roofing industry, for an improved safety railing or fencing system design that minimizes interference with roofing materials application and provides cost savings compared to existing such systems, yet provides equal or better safety protection to presently available systems. Furthermore, there is a simultaneous need for such a system that is, without customization, readily adaptable to most rooftop perimeter configurations and for accommodating related obstacles (gutters, for example).

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A safety railing or fencing system incorporating core features of the present invention will provide a number of benefits to users (workers, contractors and property owners). As illustrated by the depicted embodiments of designs incorporating features of the present invention, the present inventor's designs afford property owners and contractors with an option for providing rooftop safety fencing or railing systems that occupy minimal roof deck surface area (much less than occupied by conventional such systems). The preferred embodiment allows for the installation of the safety system by trained personnel prior to roof construction, and the system remains in place throughout the roofing, reroofing or other construction project. The system removed by trained personnel only after the project is complete. Therefore, all roof operations can be accomplished without removing the safety system providing continuous protection throughout the project. These benefits are possible subject designs allow for temporary, sequential removal of roof deck-obstructing components of the present system, such that all roofing can be completed as a single project, even while an overall, effecting railing or fencing remains in-place.

Further still, some embodiments allow for easy, non-destructive re-placement of the system at subsequent time(s) for re-roofing, replaces, etc., without having to reinstall any anchoring components. This affords considerable cost savings at later dates for property owners and contractors alike, as well as reducing the inherent hazards of anchor installations by reducing the incidence of such installations.

Without customization, systems according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention are readily adaptable to most rooftop perimeter configurations and for accommodating related obstacles.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a portion of a preferred embodiment of the safety barrier system of the present invention, viewed as if outside of a building at which top margin of which the system is installed, and looking upward toward the system.

FIG. 2 is a perspective view of a portion of a preferred embodiment of the safety barrier system of the present invention, viewed as if atop a building at which top margin of which the system is installed, and looking downward toward the system and the building's margin.

FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a portion of a preferred embodiment of the safety barrier system of the present invention, viewed as if outside of a building at which top margin of which the system is installed, and looking essentially, laterally toward the system.

FIG. 4 is a partial, perspective view of the uppermost part of the cable post assembly and an engaged cable (serving as “railing”) of a preferred embodiment of the safety barrier system of the present invention.

FIG. 5 is an elevational view of the building side anchor member and support strip of one embodiment of the safety barrier system of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Referring particularly to FIGS. 1 and 2, an embodiment incorporating the safety railing or fencing system components of the present inventor's designs is depicted, and referenced generally by the reference number 10 (hereafter “system”).

System 10, in a preferred embodiment, includes a building side anchor 12, a rooftop foot member 14, a cable post assembly 16, a top lateral spacing arm 18, a bottom lateral stabilizing arm 20, an anchor engagement arm 22 and a system support assembly 24.

System 10 is adjustable to accommodate virtually any configuration of a conventional rooftop margin of any commercial building.

The height of the cable post assembly 16 (for supporting the “railing” provided by cable(s) 17—see FIGS. 2 and 3) can be adjusted to meet regulation requirements for barrier height and spacing. Lateral spacing from a building's siding of system support assembly 24 is adjustable, for example, to avoid features such as the gutter 19 depicted in FIGS. 1 and 2.

Of significance is the adjustability of rooftop foot member 14's engagement with collar 34 (or any provided equivalent). This arrangement allows rooftop foot member 14 for any individual system 10 unit to be raised (while leaving adjacent system 10 units' rooftop foot members 14 in-place) to allow application of roofing materials, without compromising the safety railing or fencing system's integrity. Spacing of individual assemblages of system 10 will be apparent to those skilled in the art to provide adequate, regulation-prescribed force withstanding capabilities in any given jurisdiction, even when individual rooftop foot members 14 are raised for roof deck access for roofing application.

For providing the optimum flexibility for system 10 as described above, substantially all components of system 10 telescopically engage with the respectively interfaced component(s) through alignment of locking holes 26 in the respectively interfaced components, and reversibly secured in-place with hitch pins 30 (or alternatives well known in the art, including pins and cotter keys and nut/bolt assemblages).

More specifically, collar 28 telescopically receives rooftop foot member 14 therethrough, and supports, via a support bracket 32, collar 34 of cable post assembly 16. Lateral spacing arm 18 extends from collar 34 as depicted in FIGS. 1 and 2, and (in the depicted embodiment) telescopically extends through collar 38 of system support assembly 24. System support assembly 24 is itself configured (in the depicted embodiment) of two, telescopically interfaced components—inner support assembly beam 40 and outer support assembly beam 42.

At the lower terminus of inner support assembly beam 40 is affixed collar 44, through which telescopically extends bottom lateral stabilizing arm 20. Finally, anchor engagement arm 22 (in the depicted embodiment) telescopically engages with building side anchor 12.

Clearly, the respective interfaces between engaged components of system 10 can be altered in a number of ways, yet still encompass the present invention. For example, components depicted as telescopically received within another component, can instead telescopically received such other components. Even alternative interface means may be employed, such as where juxtaposed components are secured relative to each other, not by telescopic engagement with pin or bolt-based fixing, but by securing with, for example, a component (not shown) that envelopes and reversibly secures both components, one to the other. Furthermore, some embodiments of the present invention will not require adjustability of all major component interfaces of system 10, as is depicted in this preferred assemblage, but may only involve adjustment of the rooftop foot member 14, for reasons described elsewhere herein. One such example may involve the merging, in effect, of modular components shown herein as the preferred embodiments as separate, adjustable components, leaving, for example, only the rooftop foot member 14 as an adjustable component for raising and lowering as described elsewhere herein. In such case, most or all of such remaining components may constitute an at least partially unitary (as opposed to modular and/or adjustable) barrier system support frame. In any event, regardless of the modularity, or not, of most of system 10, anchor 12 will be supported by the anchor support means (webbing 23 or strip 25) in the way described elsewhere herein, and thereby providing the substantial benefits thereof.

In addition to providing sequential, temporary access to a roof deck surface as described above in relation to the adjustability of rooftop foot member 14 (unlike existing safety railing or fencing systems that provide no such temporary or sequential access), the present system 10 (in one embodiment) provides prolonged economic and safety advantages. These advantages relate to building side anchor 12.

Referring particularly to FIG. 5, building side anchor 12 extends laterally, away from the side face of a building. Building side anchor 12 engages with anchor engagement arm 22. Through the intervening, connected components of system 10, building side anchor 12 (when secured to a structure as will be discussed below), in concert with rooftop foot member 14's support via engagement with a substantially horizontally-oriented rooftop surface (see again FIGS. 1 and 2) and lateral stabilizing arm 20's contact with a structure's substantially vertical, side surface (see again, FIG. 1), secures system 10 relative to a building, as well as resists forces that would disengage system 10 from such a building (most importantly from an accidental fall against cable(s) 17).

Building side anchor 12 may be temporarily installed by suspending it from partially removable anchor suspension means (webbing 23), one embodiment of such being in the form of a strip of industrial nylon webbing that is, in turn, secured to the host structure, and through which building side anchor 12 extends (see, for example, FIG. 1). With this embodiment, after a roofing project (or other project requiring temporary safety railing or fencing) is complete, the exposed portion of webbing 23 can be cut away and building side anchor 12 (along with the remainder of system 10) can be removed. Use of this embodiment, however, requires a new installation at the time of the next such project. Considerable, additional savings (as well as, even more importantly, avoidance of safety hazards that are inherent in installing anchors for a selfevidently, not-yet-in-place safety system) can be achieved through use of an alternative embodiment that includes static anchor suspension means to suspend and position building side anchor 12 of system 10. Referring again particularly to FIG. 5, this alternative embodiment uses (instead of industrial webbing 23 as a support for building side anchor 12) a metallic (or equivalent, long-lasting substitute material) strip 25 that is intended to be left in-place, even after a project involving system 10 is complete. Strip 25 (from which, or through which extends building side anchor 12) can be installed at the first project involving use of system 10, and can be left in-place for re-engagement of system 10 for any later such projects.

Notably, whether building side anchor 12 is secured in position relative to a structure using webbing 23 (as shown, inter alia, in FIG. 1), or a strip 25 (as shown in FIG. 5), each may be secured to a structure in such a way that neither the installation, presence, nor removal of system 10 presents any hindrance or deleterious effect on the roofing or construction process, nor to the building itself. More specifically, both webbing 23 and strip 25 are not affixed to any exposed, exterior roofing surface, but rather is affixed to the structure preferably, for example, by attachment to a surface beneath the moisture membrane of the structure's roofing. The webbing 23 or strip 25 then extends from beneath the actual roofing material from the perimeter thereof to extend downward along the building's intersecting, vertical face, as shown in the various figures. This arrangement results in the chosen anchor suspension means having no contact with, nor obstruction of any portion of the actual roofing surface (such as would, for example, otherwise impede roofing or re-roofing operations, and require after removal “patchwork” to complete the project.

Though not depicted in the drawings, additional stabilizing means, extending between successive units of system 10, may be added, for example, near the outer most terminus of lateral stabilizing arm 20. This is envisioned as providing addition stability for each individual unit of system 10 as against rotation substantially about the long axis of outer support assembly beam 42. Such is the only stabilizing effect not already provided through the combined effects of building side anchor 12 (when secured to a structure as elsewhere discussed), rooftop foot member 14's engagement with rooftop surface and lateral stabilizing arm 20's contact with a structure's vertical, side surface.

Although the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments, this description is not meant to be construed in a limited sense. Various modifications of the disclosed embodiments, as well as alternative embodiments of the inventions will become apparent to persons skilled in the art upon the reference to the description of the invention. It is, therefore, contemplated that the appended claims will cover such modifications that fall within the scope of the invention.

Claims

1. A reversibly attachable safety barrier system comprising: a barrier system support frame;horizontal surface engagement means for supporting said barrier system support frame through engagement with a substantially horizontal surface of a structure;vertical surface engagement means for supporting said barrier system support frame through engagement with a substantially vertical surface of said structure simultaneously with said horizontal surface engagement means' engagement with said horizontal surface;a building side anchor member configured for engagement with one or more components of said barrier system;anchor suspension means for supporting said building side anchor member, said anchor suspension mean being constructed of materials comprising a user-destructible material; andanchor suspension means attachment means for attaching said anchor suspension means to said structure.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein said anchor suspension means and said anchor suspension means attachment means are configured for attachment to said structure beneath said structure's roofing moisture barrier, without substantial post-attachment displacement or disfiguration of said moisture barrier and for allowing remaining portions of said anchor suspension means to extend from the attachment site to and downward from an adjacent intersection of said structure's top surface a said structure's exterior, substantially vertical surface.

3. A reversibly attachable safety barrier system comprising: a barrier system support frame;horizontal surface engagement means for supporting said barrier system support frame through engagement with a substantially horizontal surface of a structure;vertical surface engagement means for supporting said barrier system support frame through engagement with a substantially vertical surface of said structure simultaneously with said horizontal surface engagement means' engagement with said horizontal surface;a building side anchor member configured for engagement with one or more components of said barrier system;anchor suspension means for supporting said building side anchor member, said anchor suspension mean being constructed substantially of a material that is of substantial, molecular and structural uniformity;anchor suspension means attachment means for attaching said anchor suspension means to said structure.

4. The system of claim 3 wherein said anchor suspension means and said anchor suspension means attachment means are configured for attachment to said structure beneath said structure's roofing moisture barrier, without substantial post-attachment displacement or disfiguration of said moisture barrier and for allowing remaining portions of said anchor suspension means to extend from the attachment site to and downward from an adjacent intersection of said structure's top surface a said structure's exterior, substantially vertical surface.

5. The system of claim 3 wherein said anchor suspension means is constructed from materials selected from a group consisting of metals, polymer plastics, and carbon-fiber-based strapping.

6. The system of claim 3 wherein said anchor suspension means is constructed from materials selected from a group consisting of metals, polymer plastics, and carbon-fiber-based strapping.

7. The system of claim 1 wherein said a barrier system support frame is configured to include barrier system support frame adjustment means for facilitating adjustment of said barrier system's components' relative positioning to accommodate structures of varying configurations and obstacles at roofing perimeters.

8. The system of claim 3 wherein said a barrier system support frame is configured to include barrier system support frame adjustment means for facilitating adjustment of said barrier system's components' relative positioning to accommodate structures of varying configurations and obstacles at roofing perimeters.

9. The system of claim 2 wherein said a barrier system support frame is configured to include barrier system support frame adjustment means for facilitating adjustment of said barrier system's components' relative positioning to accommodate structures of varying configurations and obstacles at roofing perimeters.

10. The system of claim 4 wherein said a barrier system support frame is configured to include barrier system support frame adjustment means for facilitating adjustment of said barrier system's components' relative positioning to accommodate structures of varying configurations and obstacles at roofing perimeters.

11. The system of claim 6 wherein said a barrier system support frame is configured to include barrier system support frame adjustment means for facilitating adjustment of said barrier system's components' relative positioning to accommodate structures of varying configurations and obstacles at roofing perimeters.