The present invention relates to rope systems and methods and, in particular, to ropes that are coated to improve the resistance of the rope to bending fatigue.
The characteristics of a given type of rope determine whether that type of rope is suitable for a specific intended use. Rope characteristics include breaking strength, elongation, flexibility, weight, bending fatigue resistance and surface characteristics such as abrasion resistance and coefficient of friction. The intended use of a rope will determine the acceptable range for each characteristic of the rope. The term “failure” as applied to rope will be used herein to refer to a rope being subjected to conditions beyond the acceptable range associated with at least one rope characteristic.
The present invention relates to ropes that are commonly referred to in the industry as “lift lines”. Lift lines are used to deploy (lower) or lift (raise) submersible equipment used for deep water exploration. Bending fatigue and abrasion resistance characteristics are highly important in the context of lift lines.
In particular, a length of lift line is connected at a first end to an on-board winch or capstan and at a second end to the submersible equipment. Between the winch and the submersible equipment, the lift line passes over or is wrapped around one or more intermediate structural members such as a closed chock, roller chock, bollard or bit, staple, bullnose, cleat, a heave compensating device, or a constant tensioning device.
When loads are applied to the lifting line, the lifting line wraps around such intermediate structural members and is thus subjected to bending fatigue and abrasion at the intermediate structural members. Abrasion and heat generated by friction at the point of contact between the lifting line and the intermediate structural members can create wear on the lifting line that can affect the performance of the lifting line and possibly lead to failure thereof.
The need thus exists for improved ropes for use as lifting lines that have improved bending fatigue and abrasion resistance characteristics.
The present invention may be embodied as a rope structure adapted to engage an intermediate structure while loads are applied to ends of the rope structure comprising a primary strength component and a coating. The primary strength component comprises a plurality of fibers adapted to bear the loads applied to the ends of the rope structure. The coating comprises a mixture of a lubricant portion and a binder portion. The lubricant portion comprises particles having an average size of within approximately 0.01 microns to 2.00 microns. The binder portion is applied to the primary strength portion as a liquid and dries to support the lubricant portion relative to at least some of the fibers. The matrix supports the lubricant portion such that the lubricant portion reduces friction between at least some of the plurality of fibers and between at least some of the plurality of fibers and the intermediate structure.
The present invention may also be embodied as a method of forming a rope structure adapted to engage an intermediate structure while loads are applied to ends of the rope structure, comprising the following steps. A plurality of fibers is combined to form a primary strength component adapted to bear the loads applied to the ends of the rope structure. A coating material is provided in liquid form and comprises a lubricant portion and a binder portion. The coating material comprises substantially between 5% and 40% by weight of the lubricant portion. The coating material is applied in liquid form to the primary strength component. The coating material applied to the primary strength component is allowed to dry on the primary strength component such that the binder portion at least partly surrounds at least some of the fibers to support the lubricant portion relative to at least some of the fibers such that the lubricant portion reduces friction between adjacent fibers and between at least some of the plurality of fibers and the intermediate structure.
The present invention may also be embodied as a rope structure adapted to engage an intermediate structure while loads are applied to ends of the rope structure comprising a primary strength component and a coating. The primary strength component comprises a plurality of fibers adapted to bear the loads applied to the ends of the rope structure, where the plurality of fibers are combined to form a plurality of yarns, the plurality of yarns are combined to form a plurality of strands, and the plurality of strands are combined to form the primary strength component. The coating comprises particles suspended within a matrix formed of binder material such that the binder fixes the particles relative to at least some of the fibers such that the particles reduce friction between at least some of the plurality of fibers and between at least some of the plurality of fibers and the intermediate structure. An average size of the particles is within approximately 0.01 microns to 2.00 microns.
Referring initially to
In addition, the example rope structures 20a and 20b each comprises a coating 30 that is applied either to the entire rope structure (
The fibers 26 are combined to form the primary strength component of the rope structures 20a and 20b. The lubricant portion 34 of the coating 30 is supported by the binder portion 32 to reduce friction between adjacent fibers 26 as well as between the fibers 26 and any external structural members in contact with the rope structure 20a or 20b. The lubricant portion 34 of the coating 30 thus reduces fatigue on the fibers 26 when the rope structures 20a or 20b are bent around external structures. Without the lubricant portion 34 of the coating 30, the fibers 26 would abrade each other, increasing bending fatigue on the entire rope structure 20a or 20b. The lubricant portion 34 of the coating 30 further reduces friction between the fibers 26 and any external structural members, thereby increasing abrasion resistance of the rope structures 20a and 20b.
With the foregoing understanding of the basic construction and characteristics of the rope structures 20a and 20b of the present invention in mind, the details of construction and composition of the rope structures 20 will now be described.
In the liquid form, the coating material comprises at least a carrier portion, the binder portion, and the lubricant portion. The carrier portion maintains the liquid form of the coating material in a flowable state. However, the carrier portion evaporates when the wet coating material is exposed to the air, leaving the binder portion 32 and the lubricant portion 34 to form the coating 30. When the coating material has dried to form the coating 30, the binder portion 32 adheres to the surfaces of at least some of the fibers 26, and the lubricant portion 34 is held in place by the binder portion 32. The coating material is solid but not rigid when dried as the coating 30.
In the example rope structures 20a and 20b, the coating material is formed by a mixture comprising a base forming the carrier portion and binder portion and PolyTetraFluoroEthylene (PTFE) forming the lubricant portion. The base of the coating material is available from s.a. GOVI n.v. of Belgium under the tradename LAGO 45 and is commonly used as a coating material for rope structures. Alternative products that may be used as the base material include polyurethane dispersions; in any event, the base material should have the following properties: good adhesion to fiber, stickiness, soft, flexible. The base of the coating material is or may be conventional and will not be described herein in further detail.
The example lubricant portion 34 of the coating material is a solid material generically known as PTFE but is commonly referred to by the tradename Teflon. The PTFE used in the coating material of the example rope structures 20a and 20b is in powder form, although other forms may be used if available. The particle size of the PTFE should be within a first preferred range of approximately 0.10 to 0.50 microns on average but in any event should be within a second preferred range of 0.01 to 2.00 microns on average. The example rope structures 20a and 20b are formed by a PTFE available in the marketplace under the tradename PFTE30, which has an average particle size of approximately 0.22 microns.
The coating material used by the example rope structures 20a and 20b comprises PTFE within a first preferred range of approximately 32 to 37% by weight but in any event should be within a second preferred range of 5 to 40% by weight, with the balance being formed by the base. The example rope structures are formed by a coating material formed by approximately 35% by weight of the PTFE.
As an alternative to PTFE, the lubricant portion 34 may be formed by solids of other materials and/or by a liquid such as silicon oil. Other example materials that may form the lubricant portion 34 include graphite, silicon, molybdenum disulfide, tungsten disulfide, and other natural or synthetic oils. In any case, enough of the lubricant portion 34 should be used to yield an effect generally similar to that of the PTFE as described above.
The coating 30 is applied by dipping the entire rope structure 2a and/or individual strands 22 into or spraying the structure 20a and/or strands 22 with the liquid form of the coating material. The coating material is then allowed to dry on the strands 22 and/or rope structure 20a. If the coating 30 is applied to the entire rope structure 20a, the strands are braided or twisted before the coating material is applied. If the coating 30 is applied to the individual strands 22, the strands are braided or twisted to form the rope structure 20b after the coating material has dried.
In either case, one or more voids 36 in the coating 30 may be formed by absences of coating material. Both dipping and spraying are typically done in a relatively high speed, continuous process that does not allow complete penetration of the coating material into the rope structures 20a and 20b. In the example rope structure 20a, a single void 36 is shown in
In the example rope structures 20a and 20b, the matrix formed by the coating 30 does not extend through the entire volume defined by the rope structures 20a or 20b. In the example structures 20a and 20b, the coating 30 extends a first preferred range of approximately ¼ to ½ of the diameter of the rope structure 20a or the strands of the rope structure 20b but in any event should be within a second preferred range of approximately ⅛ to ¾ of the diameter of the rope structure 20a or the strands 22 of the rope structure 20b. In the example rope structures 20a and 20b, the coating matrix extends through approximately ⅓ of the diameter of the rope structure 20a or the strands 22 of the rope structure 20b.
In other embodiments, the matrix formed by the coating 30 may extend entirely through the entire diameter of rope structure 20a or through the entire diameter of the strands 22 of the rope structure 20b. In these cases, the rope structure 20a or strands 22 of the rope structure 20b may be soaked for a longer period of time in the liquid coating material. Alternatively, the liquid coating material may be forced into the rope structure 20a or strands 22 of the rope structure 20b by applying a mechanical or fluid pressure.
The following discussion will describe several particular example ropes constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention as generally discussed above.
Referring now to
The exemplary rope core 42 and rope jacket 44 are formed from the strands 46 and 48 using a braiding process. The example rope 40 is thus the type of rope referred to in the industry as a double-braided rope. The strands 46 and 48 may be substantially identical in size and composition. Similarly, the yarns 50 and 52 may also be substantially identical in size and composition. However, strands and yarns of different sizes and compositions may be combined to form the rope core 42 and rope jacket 44. Additionally, the fibers 54 and 56 forming at least one of the yarns 50 and 52 may be of different types.
Referring now to
The strands 62 are formed by combining the yarns 64 using any one of a number of processes. The exemplary rope 60 is formed from the strands 62 using a braiding process. The example rope 60 is thus the type of rope referred to in the industry as a braided rope.
The strands 62 and yarns 64 forming the rope 60 may be substantially identical in size and composition. However, strands and yarns of different sizes and compositions may be combined to form the rope 60. In the example rope 60, the strands 62 (and thus the rope 60) may be 100% HMPE or a blend of 40-60% by weight of HMPE with the balance being Vectran.
Referring now to
The strands 72 are formed by combining the yarns 74 using any one of a number of processes. The exemplary rope 70 is formed from the strands 72 using a twisting process. The example rope 70 is thus the type of rope referred to in the industry as a twisted rope.
The strands 72 and yarns 74 forming the rope 70 may be substantially identical in size and composition. However, strands and yarns of different sizes and compositions may be combined to form the rope 70.
Referring now to
The strands 82 are formed by combining the yarns 84 using any one of a number of processes. The exemplary rope 80 is formed from the strands 82 using a braiding process. The example rope 80 is thus the type of rope commonly referred to in the industry as a braided rope.
The strands 82 and yarns 84 forming the rope 80 may be substantially identical in size and composition. However, strands and yarns of different sizes and compositions may be combined to form the rope 80. The first and second types of fibers are combined to form at least some of the yarns 84 are different as described above with reference to the fibers 24 and 28. In the example rope 80, the strands 82 (and thus the rope 80) may be 100% HMPE or a blend of 40-60% by weight of HMPE with the balance being Vectran.
Given the foregoing, it should be clear to one of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be embodied in other forms that fall within the scope of the present invention.
This application, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/732,294 filed on Dec. 31, 2012, is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/776,958 filed May 10, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,341,930, which issued on Jan. 1, 2013. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/776,958 is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/522,236 filed Sep. 14, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,739,863, which issued on Jun. 22, 2010. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/522,236 claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/717,627 filed Sep. 15, 2005. The subject matter of the foregoing related applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
429174 | Ogilvy | Jun 1890 | A |
568531 | Harthan | Sep 1896 | A |
1257398 | Roach | Feb 1918 | A |
1479865 | Metcalf | Jan 1924 | A |
1490387 | Hansen | Apr 1924 | A |
1695480 | Buoy | Oct 1926 | A |
1710740 | Ljungkull | Apr 1929 | A |
1769945 | Erkert | Jul 1930 | A |
1850767 | Page | Dec 1930 | A |
1833587 | Page | Jan 1931 | A |
1908686 | Burke | May 1933 | A |
1931808 | Andersen | Oct 1933 | A |
2070362 | Kreutz | Feb 1937 | A |
2074956 | Carstarphen | Mar 1937 | A |
2245824 | Roesch | Jun 1941 | A |
2299568 | Dickey | Oct 1942 | A |
2338831 | Whitcomb et al. | Jan 1944 | A |
2359424 | Joy | Oct 1944 | A |
2480005 | Ewell | Aug 1949 | A |
2840983 | Keilbach | Jul 1958 | A |
2960365 | Meisen | Nov 1960 | A |
3035476 | Fogden | May 1962 | A |
3073209 | Benk et al. | Jan 1963 | A |
3276810 | Antell | Oct 1966 | A |
3358434 | McCann | Dec 1967 | A |
3367095 | Field, Jr. | Feb 1968 | A |
3371476 | Costello et al. | Mar 1968 | A |
3383849 | Stirling | May 1968 | A |
3411400 | Morieras et al. | Nov 1968 | A |
3415052 | Stanton | Dec 1968 | A |
3425737 | Sutton | Feb 1969 | A |
RE26704 | Norton | Nov 1969 | E |
3481134 | Whewell, Jr. | Dec 1969 | A |
3507949 | Campbell | Apr 1970 | A |
3537742 | Black | Nov 1970 | A |
3561318 | Andriot, Jr. | Feb 1971 | A |
3653295 | Pintard | Apr 1972 | A |
3662533 | Snellman et al. | May 1972 | A |
3718945 | Brindejonc de Treglode | Mar 1973 | A |
3729920 | Sayers et al. | May 1973 | A |
3762865 | Weil | Oct 1973 | A |
3771305 | Barnett | Nov 1973 | A |
3839207 | Weil | Oct 1974 | A |
3854767 | Burnett | Dec 1974 | A |
3904458 | Wray | Sep 1975 | A |
3906136 | Weil | Sep 1975 | A |
3915618 | Feucht et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3943644 | Walz | Mar 1976 | A |
3957923 | Burke | May 1976 | A |
3968725 | Holzhauer | Jul 1976 | A |
3977172 | Kerawalla | Aug 1976 | A |
3979545 | Braus et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4031121 | Brown | Jun 1977 | A |
4036101 | Burnett | Jul 1977 | A |
4050230 | Senoo et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4056928 | de Vries | Nov 1977 | A |
4099750 | McGrew | Jul 1978 | A |
4116481 | Raue | Sep 1978 | A |
4155394 | Shepherd et al. | May 1979 | A |
4159618 | Sokaris | Jul 1979 | A |
4170921 | Repass | Oct 1979 | A |
4173113 | Snellman et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4184784 | Killian | Jan 1980 | A |
4195113 | Brook | Mar 1980 | A |
4202164 | Simpson et al. | May 1980 | A |
4210089 | Lindahl | Jul 1980 | A |
4226035 | Saito | Oct 1980 | A |
4228641 | O'Neil | Oct 1980 | A |
4232619 | Lindahl | Nov 1980 | A |
4232903 | Welling et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4250702 | Gundlach | Feb 1981 | A |
4257221 | Feinberg | Mar 1981 | A |
4258608 | Brown | Mar 1981 | A |
4286429 | Lin | Sep 1981 | A |
4312260 | Morieras | Jan 1982 | A |
4321854 | Foote et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4329794 | Rogers | May 1982 | A |
4350380 | Williams | Sep 1982 | A |
4375779 | Fischer | Mar 1983 | A |
4403884 | Barnes | Sep 1983 | A |
4412474 | Hara | Nov 1983 | A |
4421352 | Raue et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4464812 | Crook, Jr. et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4500593 | Weber | Feb 1985 | A |
4509233 | Shaw | Apr 1985 | A |
4534163 | Schuerch | Aug 1985 | A |
4534262 | Swenson | Aug 1985 | A |
4563869 | Stanton | Jan 1986 | A |
4606183 | Riggs | Aug 1986 | A |
4619108 | Hotta | Oct 1986 | A |
4635989 | Tremblay et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4640179 | Cameron | Feb 1987 | A |
4642854 | Kelly et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4677818 | Honda et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4757719 | Franke | Jul 1988 | A |
4762583 | Kaempen | Aug 1988 | A |
4779411 | Kendall | Oct 1988 | A |
4784918 | Klett et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4850629 | St. Germain | Jul 1989 | A |
4856837 | Hammersla, Jr. | Aug 1989 | A |
4868041 | Yamagishi et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4887422 | Klees et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4947917 | Noma et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4958485 | Montgomery et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4974488 | Spralja | Dec 1990 | A |
4978360 | Devanathan | Dec 1990 | A |
5060466 | Matsuda et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5091243 | Tolbert et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5141542 | Fangeat et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5178923 | Andrieu et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5211500 | Takaki et al. | May 1993 | A |
D338171 | Bichi | Aug 1993 | S |
5240769 | Ueda et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5288552 | Hollenbaugh, Jr. et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5296292 | Butters | Mar 1994 | A |
5327714 | Stevens et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5333442 | Berger | Aug 1994 | A |
5378522 | Lagomarsino | Jan 1995 | A |
5426788 | Meltzer | Jun 1995 | A |
5429869 | McGregor et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5441790 | Ratigan | Aug 1995 | A |
5483911 | Kubli | Jan 1996 | A |
5497608 | Matsumoto et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5501879 | Murayama | Mar 1996 | A |
5506043 | Lilani | Apr 1996 | A |
5525003 | Williams et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5636506 | Yngvesson | Jun 1997 | A |
5643516 | Raza et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5651572 | St. Germain | Jul 1997 | A |
5669214 | Kopanakis | Sep 1997 | A |
5699657 | Paulson | Dec 1997 | A |
5711243 | Dunham | Jan 1998 | A |
5718532 | Mower | Feb 1998 | A |
5727833 | Coe | Mar 1998 | A |
5802839 | Van Hook | Sep 1998 | A |
5822791 | Baris | Oct 1998 | A |
5826421 | Wilcox et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5852926 | Breedlove | Dec 1998 | A |
5873758 | Mullins | Feb 1999 | A |
5904438 | Vaseghi et al. | May 1999 | A |
5931076 | Ryan | Aug 1999 | A |
5943963 | Beals | Aug 1999 | A |
5978638 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6015618 | Orima | Jan 2000 | A |
6033213 | Halvorsen, Jr. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045571 | Hill et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6085628 | Street et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6122847 | Treu et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6146759 | Land | Nov 2000 | A |
6164053 | O'Donnell et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6265039 | Drinkwater et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6295799 | Baranda | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6341550 | White | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6365070 | Stowell et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6405519 | Shaikh et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6410140 | Land et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6422118 | Edwards | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6484423 | Murray | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6524690 | Dyksterhouse | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6575072 | Pellerin | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6592987 | Sakamoto et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601378 | Fritsch et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6704535 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6876798 | Triplett et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6881793 | Sheldon et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6916533 | Simmelink et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6945153 | Knudsen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7051664 | Robichaud et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7093416 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7127878 | Wilke et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7134267 | Gilmore et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7137617 | Sjostedt | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7165485 | Smeets et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7168231 | Chou et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7172878 | Nowak et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7182900 | Schwamborn et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7296394 | Clough et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7331269 | He et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7367176 | Gilmore et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7415783 | Huffman et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7437869 | Chou et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7472502 | Gregory et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7475926 | Summars | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7568419 | Bosman | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7637549 | Hess | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7681934 | Harada et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7735308 | Gilmore et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7739863 | Chou et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7743596 | Chou et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7784258 | Hess | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8171713 | Gilmore et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8341930 | Chou et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
20030200740 | Tao et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030226347 | Smith et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040025486 | Takiue | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040069132 | Knudsen et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050172605 | Vancompernolle et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050279074 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060048494 | Wetzels et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060048497 | Bloch | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060179619 | Pearce et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060213175 | Smith et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070079695 | Bucher et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070137163 | Hess | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070144134 | Kajihara | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20090047475 | Jeon | Feb 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2019499 | Feb 2000 | CA |
7315621 | Oct 1973 | DE |
1397304 | Mar 2004 | EP |
2197392 | Mar 1974 | FR |
312464 | May 1929 | GB |
469565 | Apr 1971 | JP |
S57161116 | Oct 1982 | JP |
1260080 | Oct 1989 | JP |
2242987 | Sep 1990 | JP |
3033285 | Feb 1991 | JP |
2000212884 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2004126505 | Apr 2001 | JP |
1019900010144 | Jul 1990 | KR |
2100674 | Dec 1997 | RU |
2295144 | Oct 2007 | RU |
618061 | Jul 1978 | SU |
1647183 | May 1991 | SU |
03102295 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2005075559 | Aug 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
US District Court, Samson Rope Technologies, Inc. v. Yale Cordage, Inc. Case 2:11-cv-00328, Document 1, Complaint (2), Dl 001-2011-02-24, 5 pages. |
US District Court, Samson Rope Technologies, Inc. v. Yale Cordage, Inc. Case 2:11-cv-00328-JLR, Document 5, Notice to PTO, Dl 005-2011-02-25, 1 page. |
US District Court, Samson Rope Technologies, Inc. v. Yale Cordage, Inc. Case 2:11-cv-00328-JLR, Document 12, Answer, Dl 012-2011-05-10, 6 pages. |
USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,363, Feb. 22, 2011, 10 pages. |
SLO, Response, U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,363, May 23, 2011, 9 pages. |
USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,363, Aug. 15, 2011, 6 pages. |
USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/463,284, Apr. 8, 2011, 13 pages. |
SLO, Response, U.S. Appl. No. 12/463,284, Jul. 8, 2011, 12 pages. |
Samson Rope Technologies, Inc., “Samson Offshore Expansion Celebrated”, Feb. 18, 2009, 2 pages. |
Samson Rope Technologies, Inc., “Samson Deep Six Performs Beyond Expectation”, Sep. 10, 2008, 2 pages. |
USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,079, Jun. 28, 2010, 8 pages. |
SLO, Response, U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,079, Oct. 28, 2010, 13 pages. |
USPTO, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,079, Nov. 8, 2010, 16 pages. |
SLO, Amendment After NOA, U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,079, Jan. 3, 2011, 4 pages. |
USPTO, Issue Notification, U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,079, Mar. 2, 2011, 1 page. |
USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/466,237, Mar. 10, 2011, 10 pages. |
SLO, Response, U.S. Appl. No. 12/466,237, Jun. 10, 2011, 15 pages. |
USPTO, Notice of Allowance and Issue Fee Due, U.S. Appl. No. 12/466,237, Jun. 29, 2011, 6 pages. |
SLO, RCE, U.S. Appl. No. 12/466,237, Sep. 16, 2011, 1 page. |
Pultrusion Industry Council, http://www.acmanet.org/pic/products/description.htm, “products & process: process description”, 2001, 2 pages. |
Samson Rope Technologies, Inc., “Dynalene Installation Instructions for Covering 12-Strand Rope”, 2005, 12 pages. |
USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/522,236, Aug. 24, 2009, 7 pages. |
USPTO, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/522,236, Feb. 17, 2010, 3 pages. |
H. A. McKenna et al., “Handbook of fibre rope technology”, 2004, pp. 88, 89, 100, Woodhead Publishing Limited, England, CRC Press LLC, USA. |
International Searching Authority, ISR PCTUS2012039460, Sep. 13, 2012, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, ISR PCT/US2014020529, Jun. 10, 2014, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, ISR PCT/US2014023749, Jun. 26, 2014, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140000233 A1 | Jan 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60717627 | Sep 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12776958 | May 2010 | US |
Child | 13732294 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11522236 | Sep 2006 | US |
Child | 12776958 | US |