This invention concerns workers' gloves, and especially gloves used by ropers, for roping cattle.
Ropers' gloves need to be fairly heavy, to protect the hands. Many available gloves are heavy, thick and protective, but they are accordingly stiff at the knuckles and wrist, therefore not providing sufficient flexibility for the roper comfortably and efficiently to handle a rope during roping operations.
Ropers' gloves have included knit construction, typically made with the same construction from the tip of the fingers to the end of the palm, where a rib construction usually begins for the cuff that surrounds the wrist. This construction produces a glove that is not sufficiently flexible at the knuckles and other joints of the hand.
There is a need for a roper's glove that adequately protects the hands while allowing sufficient flexibility and comfort at the joints or for full and easy range of motion.
The invention is a roper's glove of knitted construction, designed to reduce bulk in the knuckles so as to allow a high degree of flexibility and a full range of motion in gripping and handling the rope. The primary use of the gloves of the invention is in competitive rodeo events such as team roping or calf roping. In the invention a modified knit construction is specifically engineered into the knuckles of the fingers and across the palm where bending occurs, to reduce bulk at these joints. By reducing bulk in the knuckles, when the hand is closed around the rope the user has better contact with the rope for enhanced feel and control, attributes needed in performance gloves used for competitive roping.
The invention improves flexibility in a roper's glove, and comfort and gripping feel and efficiency, without compromising strength of the glove. These and other objects, advantages and features of the invention will be apparent from the following description of a preferred embodiment, considered along with the accompanying drawings.
It can be seen in
Although the two feeders together produce a much greater bulk than one alone, the second nonetheless has sufficient strength in the channels, where used alone. In one example, the all-nylon first feeder 22 is a three-strand nylon filament yarn. Each of the three strands comprises two strands of 24 filament/78 Denier nylon filament fiber twisted together. This can be denoted as 3x78D/2/24. The nylon filament fibers are very small, and in this example the first feeder 22 has a diameter of about 0.08 mm. The second feeder yarn 24 of this example can be denoted 1x21s cotton yarn plus 1x78D/2/24 nylon filament yarn. In other words, feeder two comprises one strand of 21 singles cotton yarn plus one nylon composite strand which comprises two strands of 24 filament/78 Denier nylon filament fiber. The diameter of the cotton/nylon feeder 24 is about 0.16 to 0.17 mm. Thus, in this example the cotton/nylon second feeder 24 is about twice the diameter of the all-nylon first feeder 22. The total diameter, when the two feeders are used together, is about 0.24 to 0.25 mm. Therefore the bulky field knit has yarn of about 50% greater diameter than the yarn in the channels 18, in this preferred embodiment.
Further, different feeder yarns can be used, the important consideration being that the feeder yarn 24 be sufficiently strong but less bulky than the combination of yarns used in the normal knitted areas of the glove, i.e. the regions 26 and 28 shown in
The result is that ease of bending is provided at the channels, especially with multiple channels extending across each knuckle joint. The reduced bulk of the knuckles allows for better contact with a rope, for enhanced feel, grip and control.
The above described preferred embodiments are intended to illustrate the principles of the invention, but not to limit its scope. Other embodiments and variations to these preferred embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art and may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.
This application claims benefit from provisional application No. 61/946,291, filed Feb. 28, 2014.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5323490 | Yarbrough | Jun 1994 | A |
6155084 | Andrews | Dec 2000 | A |
6253382 | Kleinert | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6782720 | Vero | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6945080 | Maeda | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7434422 | Thompson | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7555921 | Thompson | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7694351 | Gait | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707653 | Kleinert | May 2010 | B2 |
7908891 | Thompson | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8001809 | Thompson | Aug 2011 | B2 |
20080072358 | Kleinert | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20100275341 | Sweeney | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20120204604 | Azeem | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130205469 | Thompson | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61946291 | Feb 2014 | US |