The present invention relates to rotary abrading tools. More particularly, the invention relates to rotary abrading tools of the erasure type.
Rotary abrading tools of the erasure type are used to remove adhesive material, such as paint and decalcomania, from metal surfaces. The tools frequently include a rotary driven annular disc comprised of an elastomeric material, called an “eraser wheel.” The eraser wheel is rotated at high speeds and pressed against adhesive material for removal. Eraser wheels of this type tend to become deformed over time and, consequently, lose their efficacy. Furthermore, pressing the circumferential surface of the rotating wheel to a target surface generates a significant amount of frictional heat. The heat may cause damage to the wheel and may cause the residue of the abraded adhesive material to bond with surface of the wheel.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,309,292 (Montabaur) discloses a rotary abrading tool of the erasure type, an object of which is to correct these problems. The Montabaur eraser wheel is an annular disc comprised of an elastomeric material and includes an outer crown of radially projecting teeth. Montabaur presumes an improved performance over prior eraser wheels based on having bendable, elastic teeth. As stated in the patent, it is further contemplated that the improved performance is due, in part, to a reduction in the required amount of pressure applied by the teeth and to the teeth during operation, when compared to that of prior eraser wheels. Montabaur further asserts that the gaps between the teeth produce an “air effect”, which serves to mitigate the frictional heat generated by the abrading. The Montabaur eraser wheel is secured to a rotary abrading tool by means of a “holder”. The holder comprises a first and second disc-shaped hub, each comprising a central opening, arranged on opposite axial sides of the eraser wheel. Each hub further comprises a plurality of axially directed ribs, which are inserted into axially directed slots defined by an inner annular crown of the eraser wheel. Montabaur shows each rib of the first hub oppositely disposed from, and in contact with, a rib from the second hub. This contact between oppositely disposed ribs presents a problem. When the wheel and holders are tightly secured to an abrading tool, as is necessary for operation, the tips of oppositely disposed members tend to gall and damage each other. The galling is further exacerbated during operation as the wheel is rotating at high speeds, and the assembly is pressed against a surface.
The rotary driven shaft of the rotary abrading tool extends through the central opening of each hub and the central axis of the eraser wheel. An annular chamber surrounding the shaft is defined by the shaft, the holders, and the inner wall of the annular eraser wheel. Montabaur asserts that this arrangement provides an “air cushion effect” when the tool is operating at high rotational speeds, wherein the outer crown of teeth are lifted uniformly from the holder and creates an annular gap between the eraser and disc holder. While Montabaur discloses an eraser wheel that maintains a uniform circular shape during operation, the uniformity is due in large part to the “air cushion effect” that uniformly lifts the outer crown from the holder. When the eraser wheel is applied to a target surface during operation, the annular gap and chamber provide little resistance against the opposing force of the pressure of a target surface against the eraser wheel. This results in the partial collapse of the eraser wheel during operation, and, consequently, the need to apply further pressure in order to compensate for the partial collapse. The lack of stability in the circular form of the rotating eraser wheel adversely affects the efficacy of the tool as the user is forced to determine the optimal applied pressure during operation, which, in turn, adversely affects the life of the wheel. The problem is compounded during operation if the user has to adjust the angle of the tool due to the demands of the target surface and/or adhesive material.
The teeth of the Montabaur eraser wheel have convergent flanks, that is, each tooth tapers toward its outer end. Abrading is effected as an edge of each tooth successively hits the target adhesive material at a high speed, thereby compromising the integrity of the adhesive material. Subsequently, a portion of the material is torn away from the underlying metal surface as the teeth drag across the compromised material. Each radially projecting tooth extends axially on the circumference of the wheel, such that each tooth is axially parallel to the other. During operation, the teeth carry flakes of the abraded adhesive material as they rotate in a circular path. Consequently, the flakes are often thrown off radially from the wheel as it rotates. As such, Montabaur teaches a shield on the rotary abrading tool for the protection of the user from the flakes.
Thus, there is a longfelt need for a rotary abrading tool assembly free from the drawbacks of the earlier tools used for erasure-type abrading. In particular, a tool of this type that provides an eraser wheel assembly that maintains a sturdy circular shape during operation, structures that mitigate damage to the components of the assembly, and includes an eraser wheel that reduces the amount of flakes projected toward the user during operation.
The subject invention comprises a rotary eraser tool assembly. The invention further comprises a wheel assembly. The wheel assembly includes an annular eraser wheel, comprised of an elastomeric material, mounted on a cylindrical core, also comprised of an elastomeric material. The core has a central through-bore and is mounted on and rotated by the spindle on a rotary tool. The wheel assembly may include a band of elastic material surrounding the circumference discoid core and frictionally engaging the inner wall of the annular wheel and the circumferential surface of the core. The wheel assembly further includes two discoid hubs which are positioned on opposite axial sides of the eraser wheel. The hubs include a central opening and axially directed members, the members being insertable in slots defined by the eraser wheel. Each inserted member may be positioned axially across from an inserted member of the other hub, and each may be separated from the other by a membrane formed from the material of the eraser wheel. The rotary driven shaft of the rotary tool extends through the central axis of the wheel assembly. The rotary driven shaft may comprise a spindle and a bolt. The teeth of the eraser wheel are helically arranged to provide a lateral “sweeping” of abraded residue and increased efficacy of the teeth over prior eraser wheels of this type.
During operation, the cylindrical core radially expands due to the radially-directed tensile stress on the core caused by the centripetal acceleration of the material in rotation. The radially expansion is substantially uniform and directly relates to the speed of the rotation. The frictional engagement of the core to the eraser wheel directly relates to the radius of the core. Hence, as the speed of rotation increases, the core radially expands, and the frictional engagement of the eraser wheel to the core increases. The increase in frictional engagement and uniform expansion during operation provide a sturdy and relatively constant circular shape of the rotating wheel and improved performance over other rotary abrading tools of this type.
One object of the subject invention is to provide a rotary abrading tool of the erasure-type that includes an eraser wheel assembly that maintains a sturdy circular shape during operation.
A second object of the invention is to provide a tool of this type that includes structures that mitigate damage to the components of the assembly.
A further object of the invention is to provide an eraser wheel having teeth that are structurally arranged to reduce the amount of flakes projected toward the user during operation.
These and other objects and features of the present invention will become readily apparent upon reading the following detailed description in view of the drawings.
The nature and mode of the operation of the present invention will now be more fully described in the following detailed description of the invention taken with the accompanying drawing figures, in which:
At the outset, it should be appreciated that like drawing numbers on different drawing views identify identical structural elements of the invention.
While the present invention is described with respect to what is presently considered to be the preferred embodiments, it is understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments. The present invention is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Adverting to the drawings,
As stated above, wheel assembly 50 comprises discoid hubs 30 and 31. Hub 30 is substantially identical to hub 31, as each is designed to attach to either axial side of eraser wheel 20.
Thus it is seen that the objects of the invention are efficiently obtained, although changes and modifications to the invention should be readily apparent to those having ordinary skill in the art, which changes would not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as claimed.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
792050 | King | Jun 1905 | A |
2049874 | Sherk | Aug 1936 | A |
2123339 | Misuraca | Jul 1938 | A |
2416785 | Welch | Mar 1947 | A |
2755601 | Lux | Jul 1956 | A |
2776529 | Osplack | Jan 1957 | A |
3079741 | Render | Mar 1963 | A |
3251086 | Springer | May 1966 | A |
3368263 | Harris, Jr. | Feb 1968 | A |
3623275 | Koella | Nov 1971 | A |
3683566 | Walters | Aug 1972 | A |
3916579 | Waller et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
4334563 | Epel et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4617761 | Miyatake et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4631869 | Miyatake et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4754551 | Scott | Jul 1988 | A |
4774788 | Shacham et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
5259914 | Fisher | Nov 1993 | A |
5284039 | Torgerson | Feb 1994 | A |
5338134 | Peng | Aug 1994 | A |
5382172 | Klier et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5535484 | Gibson | Jul 1996 | A |
5856396 | Vipperman | Jan 1999 | A |
5879504 | Winter | Mar 1999 | A |
6083345 | Frank | Jul 2000 | A |
D429393 | Rief et al. | Aug 2000 | S |
6136143 | Winter et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6309292 | Montabaur et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6358133 | Cesena et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6481307 | Klingelnberg | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6949019 | Wentworth et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
D516260 | Chen | Feb 2006 | S |
7144315 | Sun et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7695353 | Moroto et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7722442 | Jones | May 2010 | B2 |
20030143935 | Huber | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040063383 | Hui | Apr 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 9206821 | Apr 1992 | WO |