Rotary actuator

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11043885
  • Patent Number
    11,043,885
  • Date Filed
    Friday, July 14, 2017
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 22, 2021
    2 years ago
Abstract
An actuator for high rotational speed applications using a stator which utilizes laminated features to reduce Eddy current losses in the stator. This construction allows high pole counts while providing the efficiency and high speed benefits of a laminated construction. Laminated construction is very challenging for a high pole count lightweight motor, but embodiments of the device provide structural strength, and rigidity, as well as other benefits such as low manufacturing cost, high heat dissipation, integrated cooling channels, and light weight construction. Many of these benefits result from the use of a laminate sandwich of non-magnetic, heat conductive material, such as anodized aluminum, as a structural member of the stator.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

Actuators.


BACKGROUND

A high pole count motor has many advantages such as the potential for high torque and light weight. It has been shown in WIPO published patent application WO2017024409A1 that a solid stator can provide adequate performance in regard to minimizing eddy currents when speeds are relatively low such as when used in robotics. For higher speed applications the use of laminates is preferable to reduce eddy current losses. The challenge is that a high pole count axial motor has a very thin profile (if it is to take advantage of the torque to weight potential) and is therefore very difficult to build out of laminates. For example, if a single rotor and single stator construction is used, the forces pulling the stator and rotor together across the airgap would be expected to shear the glue-lines holding the laminated structure together such that the airgap would not be maintained.


SUMMARY

A rotary actuator solves this problem in a number of ways that include using a double rotor configuration where the stator is positioned between the two rotors. An advantage of this configuration is that the magnetic forces on the stator are reasonably equal in both axial directions on each of the posts at all times. This reduces the load on each of the posts and reduces the stress on each of the glue lines in the stator assembly. The tangential forces on each of the posts can also be very high when under full power, but these forces are also balanced on each posts such that the glue lines are not highly stressed at any time.


Therefore, in an embodiment, there is disclosed an electric machine comprising a stator disposed between rotors, the rotors being mounted on bearings for rotation relative to the stator about an axis of the electric machine, the rotors being separated from the stator by respective air gaps; the stator being formed of structural members, each structural member being formed of laminates, each laminate having a smallest dimension that extends axially; each structural member having slots, and magnetic posts fixed within the slots for support of the magnetic posts by the structural member; and one or more electrical conductors disposed about the posts for generating a series of commutated electromagnetic poles.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES

Embodiments of a rotary actuator will now be described by way of example, with reference to the figures, in which like reference characters denote like elements, and in which:



FIG. 1. is a section view of an embodiment of a high speed actuator showing the rotor with magnets, thrust bearings, four-point contact bearings, a stator with laminated posts, laminated structural member of the stator, the solid structural member and the conductors.



FIG. 2. is a view of an exemplary embodiment having laminated posts installed between the laminated structural member.



FIG. 3. is a view of the laminated structural member of the stator showing a preferred stack layup of laminations. Where the radial cut is radially inward or outward of the stator post slot, and alternates for each adjacent layer.



FIG. 4 is a view showing the installation of the laminated stator posts into the laminated structural member of the stator with no solid structural member present.



FIG. 5 is a view showing the installation of the laminated stator posts into the laminated structural member of the stator with a solid structural member present which has mounting features.



FIG. 6 shows how the Eddy current path is broken by the radial cuts made; both inward and outward of the stator post slot, in the laminates of the laminated structural member.



FIG. 7 is a section view of the stator and rotor to show the orientation of the magnets in the rotor and the flux path across the laminated stator posts.



FIG. 8 is a view of the final lamination assembly with 2 laminated structural pieces and laminated stator posts.



FIG. 9 is a cutaway view of the stator with some posts and coils removed.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A rotary actuator is disclosed that uses a double rotor configuration where the stator is positioned between the two rotors. An advantage of this configuration is that the magnetic forces on the stator are reasonably equal in both axial directions on each of the posts at all times. This reduces the load on each of the posts and reduces the stress on each of the glue lines in the stator assembly. The tangential forces on each of the posts can also be very high when under full power, but these forces are also balanced on each posts such that the glue lines are not highly stressed at any time.


It is desirable to use a “backiron” in this configuration (which does not actually become part of the flux path as with a conventional single stator) with high structural strength and rigidity, as well as high thermal conductivity. Aluminum would be an excellent choice in terms of high strength to weight and high thermal conductivity, but aluminum also has high electrical conductivity so it would generate high eddy currents especially at high operating speeds.


To take advantage of the structural and thermal benefits of aluminum for the backiron, a rotary actuator is disclosed that uses a stack of two or more aluminum disks with slots in the disks to receive the posts, and additional slots, such as radially outward or inward from the slots, to eliminate an electrically conductive path around each of the posts. A single piece of aluminum may be used with radial slots to prevent eddy currents, but it is believed by the inventors that a laminated aluminum structure with eddy current slots that alternate from layer to layer from radially inward to radially outward, provide a stronger and stiffer structure for a given thickness. This is because the eddy current slots on one layer align with a non-slotted ring of material on the next aluminum layer such that the no two adjacent layers have aligned eddy current slots.


The aluminum in the backiron laminates may be coated but they are preferably anodized such as with a hard anodized finish. Anodizing is essentially a ceramic coating which provides high dielectric strength and reasonably good thermal conductivity.


An electric motor/actuator may comprise of a stator which utilizes ferromagnetic material laminates for the electromagnetic posts to reduce the Eddy Current losses. And a high thermal conducting material is preferred to be used in the stator structure to get heat out of the device. The rotor may be made of a ferrous material that performs as required.













ID



Ref. #
Description







20
Stator Coil


22
Stator Post Laminate


24
Stator Non-Ferrous Structural Laminate


26
Stator back Bone


28
Outer Rotor Housing


30
Rotor Magnet


32
Thrust Bearing


34
Ball Bearing


36
Stator Post Laminated Assembly


38
“M” Non-Ferrous Stator Structural Laminate


40
“W” Non-Ferrous Stator Structural Laminate


42
Discontinuous Eddy Current Loop Path


44
Internal Stator Cooling Chamber


46
Radial Cut


48
Stator Post and structural laminate


50
Rotor Side 1


52
Rotor Side 2


54
Rotor pole


56
Structural laminate Assembly


58
Air gap


60
Slots


62
Ridges on the stator backbone


64
Channel around inside of stator structural members


66
Chambers between the structural members and between the posts









As shown in FIG. 1, an electric machine comprises a stator, with a backbone 26 and structural laminate assembly 56 disposed between rotors 50 and 52, the rotors 50, 52 being mounted on bearings 32, 34 for rotation relative to the stator about an axis of the electric machine. Approximate location of the axis is identified as A in FIG. 4. The rotors 50, 52 are separated from the stator by respective air gaps 58. As shown in FIG. 2, the stator structural laminate assembly 56 may comprise structural members 24, each structural member being formed as shown in FIG. 2 of annular laminates 38, 40 each laminate 38, 40 having a smallest dimension that extends axially. Each structural member 24 and the corresponding laminates have openings or slots 60, and (as shown in FIG. 4) magnetic posts 36 fixed within the slots 60 for support of the magnetic posts by the structural member 24. The slots 60 may have a longest dimension that extends radially, an intermediate dimension that extends circumferentially and a depth that extends axially. As shown in FIG. 2, one or more electrical conductors 20 are disposed about the posts 36 for generating a series of commutated electromagnetic poles. There may be M poles and N posts and the greatest common factor of N and M is three or more.


As shown in FIG. 5, the backbone 26 comprises an outer backbone 68 and inner backbone 70, with the structural members 24 being secured on either side of ridges 62 that extend respectively inward of the outer backbone and outward of the inner backbone. The structural members 24 may be secured to the ridges 62 by any suitable means such as glue.


The rotors 50, 52 are mirror images of each other and are secured to each other for example with bolts or screws (not shown) at their outside peripheries. As shown in FIG. 1 the rotors 50, 52 are mounted for rotation relative to the stator on radial bearings 34 at the inside of the stator and on thrust or axial bearings 32 at the outside of the stator. Bearing races are formed on the backbone 26 of the stator and in the rotors 50, 52. The stator backbone 26 may be secured to a fixed structure at the inner periphery of the backbone 26 by any suitable means. The outward periphery 28 of the rotors 50, 52 may then be used as the output. Power for the windings 20 may be supplied through the inner part of the backbone 26 through channels (not shown). As shown in FIG. 2 the radial length of the stator posts 22 between the structural members 24 may be less than the distance between the ridges 62 of the stator backbone 26 to form a channel 64 around the stator that may be used for flow of a cooling fluid. Channels (not shown) in the inner part of the stator backbone 26 may be used for flowing a cooling fluid in and out of the channel 64.


An exemplary embodiment may use an Iron alloy for the stator posts laminations and an Aluminium alloy for the structural laminates. The stator of an electric machine is formed of structural laminates 24 that have slots that posts 22 are fixed within. The structural laminates 24 have a thinnest dimension in the axial direction, and in the radial direction are annular.


For the structural laminate 24, as shown in FIG. 3, it is preferred to have radial cuts 46 made from the post slot to the edge of the material to remove the Eddy current loop path 42 around the stator post, as shown in FIG. 6. Slots may also be between the posts such as circumferentially between every second post. The preferred embodiments have opposing radial cuts per layer, as seen in FIG. 3, these may be referred to as the “M” 38 and “W” 40 laminates. This is to remove the Eddy current loop path 42 on all the layers of the structural laminate while still maintaining adequate strength and rigidity in the aluminum layers by virtue of the overlapping sections on one or both sides of each slot on another layer. In an embodiment shown in FIG. 2, it is shown to have but not limited to five layers in each laminated assembly 24, the quantity of the layers is driven by the design scope. This then creates a thicker assembly that has the strength requirement and will reduce the loss from the Eddy Currents by virtue of the interrupted eddy current path on each layer, and the electrical insulation, such as an anodized surface, between each layer.


The stator post laminates 36, which are preferred to be mounted perpendicular to the structural laminate 24, are then to be mounted between two structural laminates to create the stator, this can be seen in FIG. 4 where an embodiment is mechanically fixed between the structural laminates by a tab at the inner and outer radial position. This assembly may be preferred to have interference and be pressed together to create a solid assembly 48 as seen in FIG. 8. It may be preferred to then coat this sub-assembly in a potting compound to add another material to help the heat get from the stator posts to the structural laminate. The magnetic posts may have an enlarged central section that defines respective shoulders that form the tabs and the respective shoulders engage the structural members to resist axial movement of the magnetic posts within the structural members. The posts and structural members together define chambers 66.


In this preferred configuration a post lamination 36 is used for two stator posts, and acts as a single magnetic dipole. This requires the rotor to have the magnets 30 on side 52 to form poles 54 rotated by one pitch relative to side 50. So that a North Pole is across from a South Pole on the other side of the rotor, seen in FIG. 7 so that axially opposed magnets have opposite polarity.


The chambers 66 and channel 64 together create a chamber 44 between the two structural laminates as seen in FIG. 2 and FIG. 9, which may extend throughout the space between the stator backbone and rotors that is not occupied by the structural members 24 or the posts. This chamber may be filled with a fluid or gas to remove heat from the stator and stator coils. This is preferred as the fluid or gas will be in direct contact with the center of stator post and structural laminated member which will allow effective heat transfer. This may be preferable as this allows the device to run at higher currents while maintaining a stable, desired temperature. The fluid or gas in this chamber is preferred to flow through the chamber due to a pressure differential between an inlet and an outlet (not shown, but may be in the inner backbone). The fluid or gas may also remain static, or if air cooling is preferred, ambient air may also flow through by natural convection.


To manufacture the device, it may be necessary or helpful to insert a spacer between the two laminated structural members when the posts and aluminum disks are assembled. Then after the coils are added and the stator is potted, the spacer prevents the potting compound from filling the space between the laminated aluminum disks. This spacer is preferably made of a dissolvable material or a meltable material such as wax, which can be removed by dissolving or melting after potting is complete.


To attach the laminated stator assembly to another entity it may be required to insert a solid member in-between the laminates during the assembly process. This is shown in FIG. 5 where an exemplary member is inserted between the structural laminations. This exemplary member allows bearing on the ID and OD to be used and a bolt hole pattern on the ID flange 72 of stator backbone 26.


A single set of coils could be used between the two structural members with shorter posts, instead of the coils 20 shown, that only just protrude from the structural members. This would not have the cooling benefits but would be a lower profile assembly.


With a rotor on each side of the stator, there are balanced axial forces on the stator poles that results from the rotor poles acting with equal force on both axial ends of each post. This tends to eliminate the shear force on the stator post laminates, which reduces the strain on the glue layers between the laminates. The mechanical securing of the stator post laminates between the two aluminum layered disks (with the wider section of the posts between the aluminum layered disks) resists movement of the laminates even if the glue fails. The design reduces eddy currents in the laminates of the structural members as a result of the alternating ID-OD slots in each layer. Alternating from ID to OD with each successive layer provides a non-interrupted surface on at least one side of each eddy current prevention slot on an adjacent layer.


The use of aluminum for the structural members results in a lighter weight structure with excellent heat dissipation characteristics. Anodizing these layers before assembly provides electrical insulation with minimal thermal insulation between layers. The space between the aluminum layered disks can also be used for internal fluid cooling.

Claims
  • 1. An electric machine comprising a stator disposed between rotors, the rotors being mounted on bearings for rotation relative to the stator about an axis of the electric machine, the rotors being separated from the stator by respective air gaps;the stator comprising structural members, each structural member being formed of laminates, each laminate having a smallest dimension that extends axially;each structural member having slots, and magnetic posts fixed within the slots for support of the magnetic posts by the structural member; andone or more electrical conductors disposed about the posts for generating a series of commutated electromagnetic poles,wherein each laminate includes a radial cut for functioning as a barrier to completion of an electrical current circuit around the posts, wherein the radial cuts in the respective laminates are made from a post slot to an adjacent edge of the laminate, and wherein the radial cuts alternate on adjacent laminates between opposing sides of the slots.
  • 2. The electric machine of claim 1 in which there are M poles and N posts and the greatest common factor of N and M is three or more.
  • 3. The electric machine of claim 1 in which each post includes an eddy current reduction feature comprising electrical insulating laminates or powder.
  • 4. The electric machine of claim 1 in which the posts comprise laminated ferrous material.
  • 5. The electric machine of claim 1 in which the posts comprise electrically insulated powdered material.
  • 6. The electric machine of claim 1 further comprising a stator backbone to which the structural members are mounted.
  • 7. The electric machine of claim 6 in which the structural members are spaced apart by ridges on the stator backbone.
  • 8. The electric machine of claim 7 in which the structural members form chambers between the structural members and the posts, and a channel extends around the inner part of the backbone, the chambers and channel combining to form a cooling chamber within the stator.
  • 9. The electric machine of claim 6 in which the stator backbone comprises an inner part and an outer part.
  • 10. The electric machine of claim 9 in which the bearings comprise radial bearings between the rotors and inner part of the backbone and axial thrust bearings between the rotors and the outer part of the backbone.
  • 11. The electric machine of claim 1 in which the radial cuts comprise blind slots.
  • 12. The electric machine of claim 1 in which the stator posts are laminated.
  • 13. The electric machine of claim 12 in which the stator posts comprise magnetic materials.
  • 14. The electric machine of claim 1 in which the laminated posts extend axially outward on both sides of the structural members and pass through each of the structural members, each post forming a magnetic dipole, and axially opposed magnets of the rotors have opposite polarity.
  • 15. The electric machine of claim 1 in which the structural members comprise non-magnetic material.
  • 16. The electric machine of claim 15 in which the laminates of the structural members comprise anodized aluminum.
  • 17. The electric machine of claim 1 in which the magnetic posts have an enlarged central section defining respective shoulders and the respective shoulders engage the structural members to resist axial movement of the magnetic posts within the structural members.
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/CA2017/050858 7/14/2017 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2018/010032 1/18/2018 WO A
US Referenced Citations (205)
Number Name Date Kind
2665243 Young et al. Jan 1954 A
3383534 Ebbs May 1968 A
4245870 Punshon et al. Jan 1981 A
4307309 Barrett Dec 1981 A
4310390 Bradley et al. Jan 1982 A
4319152 Van Mar 1982 A
4394594 Schmider et al. Jul 1983 A
4398112 Van Aug 1983 A
4501980 Welburn Feb 1985 A
4568862 Tassinario Feb 1986 A
4658165 Vanderschaeghe Apr 1987 A
4716327 Stone Dec 1987 A
4900965 Fisher Feb 1990 A
4959577 Radomski Sep 1990 A
5004944 Fisher Apr 1991 A
5010267 Lipo et al. Apr 1991 A
5010268 Dijken Apr 1991 A
5091609 Sawada et al. Feb 1992 A
5128575 Heidelberg et al. Jul 1992 A
5144183 Farrenkopf Sep 1992 A
5177392 Scott Jan 1993 A
5212419 Fisher et al. May 1993 A
5252880 Kazmierczak et al. Oct 1993 A
5334898 Skybyk Aug 1994 A
5334899 Skybyk Aug 1994 A
5396140 Goldie et al. Mar 1995 A
5445456 Isoda et al. Aug 1995 A
5604390 Ackermann Feb 1997 A
5616977 Hill Apr 1997 A
5625241 Ewing et al. Apr 1997 A
5642009 McCleer et al. Jun 1997 A
5642013 Wavre Jun 1997 A
5646467 Floresta et al. Jul 1997 A
5744888 Zajc et al. Apr 1998 A
5834864 Hesterman et al. Nov 1998 A
5834875 Hill Nov 1998 A
5874796 Petersen Feb 1999 A
5942830 Hill Aug 1999 A
5955808 Hill Sep 1999 A
5982074 Smith et al. Nov 1999 A
6006792 Krumm et al. Dec 1999 A
6081059 Hsu Jun 2000 A
6147428 Takezawa et al. Nov 2000 A
6239516 Floresta et al. May 2001 B1
6242831 Khan Jun 2001 B1
6261437 Hernnaes et al. Jul 2001 B1
6313556 Dombrovski et al. Nov 2001 B1
6348751 Jermakian et al. Feb 2002 B1
6376961 Murakami et al. Apr 2002 B2
6417587 Komatsu et al. Jul 2002 B1
6590312 Seguchi et al. Jul 2003 B1
6601287 Pop, Sr. Aug 2003 B2
6664704 Calley Dec 2003 B2
6700297 Hsu et al. Mar 2004 B2
6768238 Knauff et al. Jul 2004 B2
6833647 Saint-Michel et al. Dec 2004 B2
6856063 Kelecy Feb 2005 B1
6933643 Heine et al. Aug 2005 B1
6936948 Bell et al. Aug 2005 B2
6975057 Gauthier et al. Dec 2005 B2
6987342 Hans Jan 2006 B2
6995494 Haugan et al. Feb 2006 B2
7109625 Jore et al. Sep 2006 B1
7141905 Vollmer Nov 2006 B2
7157827 Heideman et al. Jan 2007 B2
7190101 Hirzel Mar 2007 B2
7215056 Dressel May 2007 B2
7385329 Hill Jun 2008 B2
7425772 Vidal Sep 2008 B2
7548003 Nickel-Jetter et al. Jun 2009 B2
7554226 Kojima et al. Jun 2009 B2
7586217 Smith et al. Sep 2009 B1
7597025 Narita et al. Oct 2009 B2
7646124 Himmelmann et al. Jan 2010 B2
7663283 Holtzapple et al. Feb 2010 B2
7675213 Tenhunen Mar 2010 B2
7679260 Yamamoto et al. Mar 2010 B2
7687962 Imai et al. Mar 2010 B2
7692357 Qu et al. Apr 2010 B2
7741750 Tang Jun 2010 B1
7800471 Fullerton et al. Sep 2010 B2
7816822 Nashiki Oct 2010 B2
7836788 Kamon et al. Nov 2010 B2
7851965 Calley et al. Dec 2010 B2
7868508 Calley et al. Jan 2011 B2
7868721 Fullerton et al. Jan 2011 B2
7898123 Usui Mar 2011 B2
7911107 Nashiki Mar 2011 B2
7915776 Takahata et al. Mar 2011 B2
7923881 Ionel et al. Apr 2011 B2
7923886 Calley et al. Apr 2011 B2
7948340 Rastogi et al. May 2011 B2
7965011 Liao Jun 2011 B2
7990011 Yoshino et al. Aug 2011 B2
8004127 Potter Aug 2011 B2
8053944 Calley et al. Nov 2011 B2
8084879 Stiesdal Dec 2011 B2
8179126 Li et al. May 2012 B2
8179219 Fullerton et al. May 2012 B2
8222786 Calley et al. Jul 2012 B2
8242658 Calley et al. Aug 2012 B2
8264113 Takemoto et al. Sep 2012 B2
8330317 Burch et al. Dec 2012 B2
8395291 Calley et al. Mar 2013 B2
8395292 Amari et al. Mar 2013 B2
8405275 Calley et al. Mar 2013 B2
8415848 Calley et al. Apr 2013 B2
8450899 Umeda et al. May 2013 B2
8487497 Taniguchi Jul 2013 B2
8497615 Kimura et al. Jul 2013 B2
8558426 Stiesdal Oct 2013 B2
8704626 Fullerton et al. Apr 2014 B2
8736133 Smith et al. May 2014 B1
8749108 Dyer et al. Jun 2014 B2
8760023 Calley et al. Jun 2014 B2
8836196 Calley et al. Sep 2014 B2
8847454 Saito et al. Sep 2014 B2
8847522 Nashiki et al. Sep 2014 B2
8854171 Janecek Oct 2014 B2
8916999 Imai et al. Dec 2014 B2
8946960 Camilleri et al. Feb 2015 B2
8952590 Calley et al. Feb 2015 B2
8987968 Morishita et al. Mar 2015 B2
9006941 Zhao Apr 2015 B2
9006951 Janecek et al. Apr 2015 B2
9054566 Woolmer Jun 2015 B2
9059621 Aoyama Jun 2015 B2
9071117 Woolmer Jun 2015 B2
9111673 Fullerton et al. Aug 2015 B2
9126332 L'Ecuyer et al. Sep 2015 B2
9154024 Jore et al. Oct 2015 B2
9178399 Parviainen Nov 2015 B2
9281735 Gandhi et al. Mar 2016 B2
9287755 Woolmer et al. Mar 2016 B2
9475199 Burridge et al. Oct 2016 B2
9537362 Jansen et al. Jan 2017 B2
20030111926 Decristofaro et al. Jun 2003 A1
20040021386 Swett Feb 2004 A1
20050140227 Kuwert Jun 2005 A1
20050179336 Hasebe et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050212381 Gilmour Sep 2005 A1
20060238053 Kascak et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060284507 Murakami Dec 2006 A1
20070069591 LeFlem Mar 2007 A1
20070222306 Hultman et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070236090 Hoppe et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070278865 Matscheko Dec 2007 A1
20080001488 Pyrhonen et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080214347 Scharfenberg et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080224558 Ionel Sep 2008 A1
20080238266 Moriyama et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090001835 Kojima et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090195106 Iki Aug 2009 A1
20100019586 Lu Jan 2010 A1
20100109466 Kondo et al. May 2010 A1
20100164313 Langford et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100183460 Qin et al. Jul 2010 A1
20110025146 Goodzeit et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110033321 Mikkelsen et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110037329 Nord et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110109099 Stiesdal May 2011 A1
20110234033 Filatov Sep 2011 A1
20110260566 Odvarka et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110285141 Groendahl et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110309699 Woolmer et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120001018 Gilleran et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120001511 Matt et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120047523 Smirnov et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120086296 Cleveland Apr 2012 A1
20120104895 Ramu May 2012 A1
20120212085 Fu et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120267967 Trago et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120279338 Ihrke et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120299430 Pennander et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130113320 Calley et al. May 2013 A1
20130140920 Wei et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130147291 Woolmer et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130187492 Woolmer Jul 2013 A1
20130249330 King et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130249342 Funk Sep 2013 A1
20130342048 Hogmark Dec 2013 A1
20140035417 Nadeau et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140035423 Veronesi et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140049124 Gandhi et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140054062 Yoshida et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140132102 Peng et al. May 2014 A1
20140197701 Hossain et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140217944 Yang Aug 2014 A1
20140299668 Fullerton et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140319949 Langreck Oct 2014 A1
20140333171 Lange et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140346910 Nakano et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150048712 Janecek et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150091403 Ueda Apr 2015 A1
20150171682 Fujisawa et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150229194 Sromin Aug 2015 A1
20150244219 Woolmer Aug 2015 A1
20150270760 Kreidler et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150308438 Janecek Oct 2015 A1
20150318745 Matsuoka Nov 2015 A1
20150349591 Deguchi et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150364956 Woolmer et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160164394 Knaian et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160315510 Kawamata et al. Oct 2016 A1
20170201164 Copeland, Jr. Jul 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (86)
Number Date Country
2187096 Jun 2004 CA
1685585 Oct 2005 CN
102624108 Aug 2012 CN
203827088 Oct 2014 CN
105196889 Dec 2015 CN
3320805 Dec 1984 DE
4216489 Oct 1996 DE
19851439 Mar 2000 DE
19954196 Jun 2000 DE
69524380 Aug 2002 DE
10140362 Mar 2003 DE
1734645 Dec 2006 EP
2381559 Oct 2011 EP
2773023 Mar 2014 EP
2156536 Jul 2014 EP
2765633 Aug 2014 EP
2873551 May 2015 EP
2873601 May 2015 EP
2874227 May 2015 EP
2874277 May 2015 EP
2999102 Mar 2016 EP
2869433 Sep 2016 EP
2519483 Jul 1983 FR
H06026491 Feb 1994 JP
H06-335191 Dec 1994 JP
H10192413 Jul 1998 JP
2005-045868 Feb 2005 JP
2006-166634 Jun 2006 JP
2008-048498 Feb 2008 JP
2008-113531 May 2008 JP
2008228363 Sep 2008 JP
2009183072 Aug 2009 JP
2010246171 Oct 2010 JP
5292541 Sep 2013 JP
2013197275 Sep 2013 JP
2014036519 Feb 2014 JP
2016005350 Jan 2016 JP
2016086533 May 2016 JP
14007 Nov 2009 LV
8806375 Aug 1988 WO
9210024 Jun 1992 WO
0226271 Apr 2002 WO
03095242 Dec 2004 WO
2007026047 Mar 2007 WO
2008135628 Nov 2008 WO
03073591 Sep 2009 WO
2012101327 Aug 2012 WO
2012142230 Oct 2012 WO
2012156719 Nov 2012 WO
2013002658 Jan 2013 WO
2014090516 Jun 2014 WO
2014100255 Jun 2014 WO
2014205523 Dec 2014 WO
2015019107 Feb 2015 WO
2015032704 Mar 2015 WO
2015032705 Mar 2015 WO
2015032707 Mar 2015 WO
2015032708 Mar 2015 WO
2015032709 Mar 2015 WO
2015036779 Mar 2015 WO
2015036780 Mar 2015 WO
2015055265 Apr 2015 WO
2015070938 May 2015 WO
2015070978 May 2015 WO
2015070984 May 2015 WO
2015071012 May 2015 WO
2015071088 May 2015 WO
2015071096 May 2015 WO
2015071121 May 2015 WO
2015071127 May 2015 WO
2015071144 May 2015 WO
2015071186 May 2015 WO
2015071340 May 2015 WO
2015071400 May 2015 WO
2015071468 May 2015 WO
2015071469 May 2015 WO
2015071470 May 2015 WO
2015071576 May 2015 WO
2015072173 May 2015 WO
2015072299 May 2015 WO
2015089518 Jun 2015 WO
2015124922 Aug 2015 WO
WO2016067718 May 2016 WO
2016203101 Dec 2016 WO
2018010031 Jan 2018 WO
2018010032 Jan 2018 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (108)
Entry
Extended European Search Report in EU application No. 17826734.0, dated Feb. 19, 2020, pp. 6.
Libert et al., Investigation on Pole-Slot Combinations for Permanent-Magnet Machines with Contrated Windings Jan. 2004, 7 pages.
International Search Report and the Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/CA2017/050470, dated Aug. 15, 2017, 10 pages.
International Search Report and the Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/CA2017/050471, dated Jul. 27, 2017, 8 pages.
International Search Report and the Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/CA2017/050856, dated Oct. 19, 2017, 8 pages.
International Search Report and the Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/CA2017/050857, dated Oct. 24, 2017, 13 pages.
International Search Report and the Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/CA2017/050957, dated Dec. 11, 2017, 9 pages.
International Search Report and the Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/CA2017/050858, dated Sep. 18, 2017, 8 pages.
Magnax Specification Sheet, “Magnax Axial Flux Synchronous Motor/Generator”, Feb. 22, 2017, pp. 1-4.
Mezzarobba Thesis, “Study of innovative electric machines for high efficiency vehicular Traction applications” 2013, pp. 1-165.
Christopher A. Gallo, “Halbach Magnetic Rotor Development”, Feb. 2008, NASAITM, 25 pages.
Xo Wang, “Delicious Axial Flux Flap Jack”; Retrieved from Internet URL:< www.geekshavefeelings.com>, Feb. 24, 2013, 12 pages.
ATE, Axial-Flux-Motors (AF), Retrieved from Internet URL: <https://www.ate-system.de/en/products/af.html>, Accessed on Jan. 20, 2018, pp. 1-2.
Moreels et al., “High Efficiency Axial Flux Machines: Why Axial Flux Motor and Generator Technology Will Drive the Next Generation of Electric Machines”, V1.2; Jan. 2018, pp. 1-20.
Bures et al., “Electric Properties of Fe Based Soft Magnetic Composite”, Euro PM2011, pp. 1-64.
Baserrah et al., “Transverse flux machines with distributed windings for in-wheel Applications; Institute for Electrical Drives, Power Electronics and Devices”, 2009, pp. 102-108.
Woolmer et al., Analysis of the Yokeless and Segmented Armature Machine, 2007, 7 pages.
AXCO Motors, “Axial flux technology,” Retrieved from the Internet URL: <www.axcomotors.com/axialfluxtechnology.html> , Feb. 22, 2017, 5 pages.
Bannon et al., “Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Generator”, Retrieved from the Internet URL: <https://depts.washington.edu/nnmrec/docs/Generator%20Final%20Report%20ME%20495%20Autumn%202013.pdf>, 2013, 24 pages.
Benlamine et al., “Design of an Axial-Flux Interior Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Motor for Automotive Application: Performance Comparison with Electric Motors used in EVs and HEVs”, IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conftrence (VPPC), 2014, 6 pages.
Boglietti et al., “Evolution and Modem Approaches for Thermal Analysis of Electrical Machines”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 56, No. 3, 2009, pp. 871-882.
Capponi et al., “Recent Advances in Axial-Flux Permanent-Magnet Machine Technology”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 48, No. 6, 2012, pp. 2190-2205.
Cavagnino et al., “A Comparison Between the Axial Flux and the Radial Flux Structures for PM Synchronous Motors,” IEEEXplore, 2001, pp. 1611-1618.
Cavagnino et al., “A Comparison Between the Axial Flux and the Radial Flux Structures for PM Synchronous Motors,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 38, No. 6, 2011, 1517-1524, 2002.
Celeroton AG, “Ultra-High-Speed Magnetic Bearings”, Retrieved from the Internet URL: http://www.celeroton.com/en/technology/magnetic-bearings.html, Jul. 2, 2016, 3 pages.
Chau, “Electric Vehicle Machines and Drives: Design, Analysis and Application”, Wiley, Kindle Edition, 2015, 9 pages.
Chau, Electric Vehicle Machines and Drives: Design, Analysis and Application, Wiley-IEEE Press, John Wiley and Sons, Google books publication information, Retrieved from the Internet URL: <https://books.google.ca/books?id=03FXCQAAQBAJ&pg=PA10l&lpg#v=onepage&q&f=false>, Sep. 23, 2015, 1 page.
Cheng et al., “Advanced Electrical Machines and Machine-Based Systems for Electric and Hybrid Vehicles”, Energies, vol. 8, 2015, pp. 9541-9564.
Choi et al., “Design and Parametric Analysis of Axial Flux PM Motors With Minimized Cogging Torque”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 45, No. 6, Jun. 2009, pp. 2855-2858.
Gogue et al., “Theory & Practice of Electromagnetic Design of DC Motors & Actuators”, Technical Report, Chapter 7, Motor Design, 1993, 24 pages.
Commonplace Robotics GMBH, “SRA Service Robot Arm Version SRA 1000 HD”, 2016, 1 page.
Commonplace Robotics GMBH, “Robot Arm Mover4”, User Guide, 2012, 32 pages.
Core Gasless Power, “Technology”, Retrieved from the Internet URL:<coreoutdoorpower.com/technology>, 2015, 3 pages.
Laser Technologies, Inc., “Image from Chicago Trade Center”, Cornelius, Oct. 6, 2015, 1 page.
Cugat et al., “Magnetic Micro-Actuators and Systems (MAGMAS)”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 39, No. 5, Nov. 2003, pp. 3607-3612.
Custom Coils Inc., “Custom Coil Manufacturing”, Retrieved from the Internet URL:< http://www.ccoils.com/Custom-coil-manufacturing.html>, 2014, 3 pages.
Toro, “Basic Electric Machines”, Prentice Hall, 1989, pp. 2-3, 9-11, 124-126, 561-563, 141-143, 15 pages.
Desfosse, “What Drives CORE's Quiet Gasless Motors”, Retrieved from the Internet URL: <www.popularmechanics.com/home/reviews/a905 2/what -drives-cores-quiet -gasless-motors-15558520>, Jun. 5, 2013, 12 pages.
Gerlando et al., “Axial Flux PM Machines With Concentrated Armature Windings: Design 22 Analysis and Test Validation of Wind Energy Generators”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 58, No. 9, Sep. 2011, pp. 3795-3805.
Electric Torque Machines (ETM), “Key Technology Attributes”, Retrieved from the Internet URL: <http://etmpower.com/technology>, Jan. 24, 2016, 3 pages.
EMRAX, “EMRAX motors/generators”, Roman Susnik Electric Motor Patent Application, Retrieved from the Internet URL: <http:/ /www.enstroj .si/Electric-products/emraxmotorsgenerators.html>, Feb. 18, 2016, 2 pages.
Enstroj, “Manual for EMRAX motors”, Owner's manual for the brushless AC synchronous motor EMRAX, V2.0, 2014, 36 pages.
Finken et al., “Study and Comparison of several Permanent-Magnet excited Rotor Types regarding their Applicability in Electric Vehicles”, Emobility—Electrical Power Train, 2010, 7 pages.
Fourie, “Transverse Flux Electric Motor,” Retrieved from the Internet URL: <http://www.danielfourie.net/motor.html>, Nov. 7, 2016, 2 pages.
Galea et al., “Development of an aircraft wheel actuator for Green Taxiing”, International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM), 2014, pp. 2492-2498.
Galea et al., “Torque Density Improvements for High Performance Machines”, IEEE International Electric Machines & Drives Conference (IEMDC), 2013, pp. 1066-1073.
Galea, “High Performance, Direct Drive Machines for Aerospace Applications”, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Feb. 2013, 221 pages.
Gholamian et al., “Selecting of Slotted AFPM Motors with High Torque Density for Electric Vehicles”, International Journal of Scientific & Engineerin Research, vol. 2, Issue 6, Jun. 2011, pp. 1985-1991.
Gieras, “Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Brushless Machines,” Second Edition, Springer, 2008, 2 pages.
Gieras, “Axial Flux brushless PM machines”, Second Edition, Springer, 2008, 1 page.
Yang, et al., “Optimal Design and Control of a Torque Motor for Machine Tools,” J. Electromagnetic Analysis & Applications, 2009, pp. 220-228.
JP Notification of Reason for Rejection for Application No. 2019-523150 dated Mar. 2, 2020, pp. 8.
Valavi et al., “Effects of Loading and Slot Harmonic on Radial Magnetic Forces in Low-Speed Permanent Magnet Machine With Concentrated Windings”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 51, No. 6, Jun. 2015, 10 pages.
Wrobel et al., “Design Considerations of a Direct Drive Brushless Machine With Concentrated Windings”, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 23, No. 1, 2008, 8 pages.
Wu et al., “A Low-Speed, High-Torque, Direct-Drive Permanent Magnet Generator for Wind Turbines”, Conference Record of the IEEE Industry Applications Conference, 2000, 8 pages.
Yahaya, “Single Layer Winding of Three Phase Induction Motor”, The International Journal of Engineering and Sciences, vol. 2, No. 4, 2013, pp. 8-13.
Yang et al., “FEA Estimation and Experimental Validation of Solid Rotor and Magnet Eddy Current Loss in Single-sided Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Machines”, IEEE Energy Conversion and Exposition (ECCE), 2013, 9 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Application No. PCT/CA2017/050858, dated Jan. 24, 2019, 7 pages.
The Timken® Company, “Angular Contact”, Retrieved from the Internet URL: <https ://www .timken.com/products/timken -engineered -bearings/ball/angular-contact/>, Jan. 9, 2017, 4 pages.
Green Car Congress, “Delta Wing partners with DHX Electric Machines; ultra high-torque motors for automotive applications,” Retrieved from the Internet URL:< http://www.greencarcongress.com/2016/0l/20160126-dhx.html>, Feb. 7, 2016, 4 pages.
Grundfos, “Motor Book”, Grundfos Management A/S, 2004, 252 pages.
Hendershot, “Recent Advances in Electric Machine Design and Operation”, IEEE Miami Section in conjunction with Energy Systems Research Laboratory, 2013, 41 pages.
Henneberger et al., “Development of a New Transverse Flux Motor”, The Institution of Electrical Engineers, 1997, 6 pages.
Hochberg et al., “Evaporative Cooling of Actuators for Humanoid Robots”, Proceedings of 8th Workshop on Humanoid Soccer Robots, 13th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), 2013, 6 pages.
Hoganas, “Compact, Light and Cost-Efficient Solutions”, Somaloy® Technology, 2013, 3 pages.
Infolytica Corporation, “Axial Flux Motor,” Retrieved from the Internet URL: <http://www.infolytica.com/en/applications/ex0072/>, 2016, 2 pages.
Infolytica Corporation, “Iron loss separation in high-torque BLDC Motors”, Retrieved from the Internet URL: <http://www.infolytica.com/en/applications/ex0156/>, 2015, 2 pages.
Instructables, “Make Your Own Miniature Electric Hub Motor,” Retrieved from the Internet URL:<http://www.instructables.com/id/Make-Your-Own-Miniature-Electric-Hub-Motor/> Sep. 14, 2015, 6 pages.
International Search report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/CA2016/050947, dated Jan. 12, 2017, 13 pages.
Tanaka et al., “Study on a High Torque Density Motor for an Electric Traction Vehicle,” Retrieved from the Internet URL: <http:!/papers.sae.org/2009-01-1337/>, 2016, 1 page.
Jack, “Advances in Electric Machines: Topology, Materials and Construction,” University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle Drives and Machines Group, 2011, 52 pages.
Joby Motors, “Introducing the JM IS motor”, Retrieved from the Internet URL: <http://www.jobymotors.com/public/views/pages/products.php>, 2011, 2 pages.
Jung et al., “Unique Axial Flux Motor Design Delivers Superior Torque Density”, EET European Ele-Drive Conference International Advanced Mobility Forum, 2008, 6 pages.
Jungreuthmayer et al., “A Detailed Heat and Fluid Flow Analysis of an Internal Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine by Means of Computational Fluid Dynamics”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 59, No. 12, 2012, pp. 4568-4578.
Kasinathan et al., “Force Density Limits in Low-Speed Permanent-Magnet Machines Due to Saturation,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion vol. 20, No. 1, 2005, pp. 37-44.
Kastinger, “Design of a novel transverse flux machine”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM), 2002, 6 pages.
Lee et al., “Design of an Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Generator for a Portable Hand Crank Generating System,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics vol. 48, No. 11, 2012, pp. 2977-2980.
Libert, “Design, Optimization and Comparison of Permanent Magnet Motors for a Low-Speed Direct-Driven Mixer”, Royal Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering Electrical Machines and Power Electronics, 2004, 142 pages.
LIPO, Principles of Design, Choice of Electric Loading, Introduction to AC Machine Design, 2004, pp. 328-329.
LIPO, “Principles of Design, Practical Considerations Concerning Stator Construction”, Introduction to AC Machine Design, Wisconsin Power Electronics Research Center, 2004, pp. 330-331.
LIPO, “Principles of Design, Practical Considerations Concerning Stator Construction”, 6.11.4 Selection of Stator Slot Number, 2004, pp. 334-335.
Mahmoudi et al., “A Comparison between the TORUS and AFIR Axial-Flux Permanent-Magnet Machine Using Finite Element Analysis,” IEEE International Electric Machines & Drives Conference (IEMDC), 2011, pp. 242-247.
Marignetti et al., “Design of Axial Flux PM Synchronous Machines Through 3-D Coupled Electromagnetic Thermal and Fluid-Dynamical Finite-Element Analysis”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 55, Issue 10, 2008, pp. 3591-3601.
Maxon Academy, “Maxon DC motor Permanent magnet DC motor with careless winding”, Maxon Motor AG, 2012, 34 pages.
Maxon Academy, “Maxon EC motor, An introduction to brushless DC motors”, Maxon Motor AG, 2012, 25 pages.
Maxon Academy, “Maxon Motor Data and Operating Ranges, How to interpret the data of Maxon Motors?”, Maxon Motor AG, 2010, 29 pages.
Maxon Motor, “EC-i 40 040 mm, brushless, 70 Watt High Torque”, Apr. 2015 edition,1 page.
Maxon Motor, “High speed DC motor—Tips and tricks”, Sep. 3, 2015, 1 page.
Maxon Motor, “Trend toward multipole brushless DC motors increases”, Media Release, Jun. 12, 2015, 2 pages.
Meier, “Theoretical design of surface-mounted permanent magnet motors with field weakening capability”, Master thesis, submitted to the Royal Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering Electrical Machines and Sower Electronics, 2001, 79 pages.
MOOG Components Group, “Miniature, High-Torque, DC Servomotors and DC Gearmotors”, Series C13 Samarium Cobalt, Retrieved from the Internet URL: <www.moog.com/components>, 2017, pp. 188-192.
Morris, “Elon Musk: Cooling, not power-to-weight ratio, is the challenge with AC induction motors”, Retrieved from the Internet URL: <https://chargedevs.com/newswire/elon-musk-cooling-not-power-toweight-ratio-is-the-challenge-with-ac-induction-motors/>, on Nov. 4, 2014, 9 pages.
Myser, “A New Type of Motor Made from Gadget Guts”, Retrieved from the Internet URL:< http://www.popsci.com/gadgets/article/2013-06/gardening-circuit>, Jun. 27, 2013, 3 pages.
Oleksandr, “Study on Permanent Magnet Transverse Flux Machine”, Dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, 2012, 149 pages.
Orlik, “Transverse Flux Generators—Principle and Operation Behaviour,” 70 Conference at HUSUM Wind Energy, 2008, 20 pages.
Parviainen, “Design of Axial-Flux Permanent-Magnet Low-Speed Machines and Performance Comparison Between Radial-Flux and Axial-Flux Machines,” Doctoral thesis, 2005, 155 pages.
Paulides et al., “Eddy-Current Losses in Laminated and Solid Steel Stator Back Iron in a Small Rotary Brushless Permanent-Magnet Actuator”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 44, No. 11, 2008, pp. 4373-4376.
Pippuri et al., “Torque Density of Radial, Axial and Transverse Flux Permanent Magnet Machine Topologies”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 49, No. 5, 2013, pp. 2339-2342.
Printed Motor Works, “Brushed Pancake Motors”, Retrieved from the Internet URL:< http://www.printedmotorworks.com/brushed-pancake-motors/> , Feb. 2, 2016, 13 pages.
Printed Motor Works, “GN Series”, 3 pages.
Qu et al., “Performance Comparison of Dual-Rotor Radial-Flux and Axial-Flux Permanent-Magnet BLDC Machines”, IEEE International Electric Machines and Drives Conference (IEMDC '03), 2003, 7 pages.
Ricky, “Bright Hub Engineering, What Is Cogging in Electrical Motors?”, Retrieved from the Internet URL:< http://www.brighthubengineering.com/commercial-electrical-applications/67622-what-is-coggingin-electrical-motors/>, Feb. 27, 2016, 5 pages.
Seo et al., “A Study on Brushless DC Motor for High Torque Density”, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial, Mechatronic and Manufacturing Engineering, vol. 5, No. 10, 2011, pp. 2084-2088.
Staton et al., “Solving the More Difficult Aspects of Electric Motor Thermal Analysis”, IEEE International Electric Machines and Drives Conference, (IEMDC'03), 2003, 9 pages.
YASA Motors, “YASA-750 Axial Flux Electric Motor”, YASA Motors Limited, 2015, 2 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Application No. PCT/CA2017/050857, dated Jan. 24, 2019, 11 pages.
Yang, “FEA Estimation and Experimental Validation of Solid Rotor and Magnet Eddy Current Loss in Single-Sided Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Machines”, Doctoral dissertation, presented to the Graduate College at the University of Nebraska, 2013, 98 pages.
Yang, “FEA Estimation and Experimental Validation of Solid Rotor and Magnet Eddy Current Loss in Single-Sided Axial Machines”, Doctoral dissertation, presented to the Graduate College at the University of Nebraska, 2013, excerpt from pp. 49-50, 1 page.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190288587 A1 Sep 2019 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62363202 Jul 2016 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15235088 Aug 2016 US
Child 16317756 US