Patent Grant
11905009
This invention relates generally to the aviation field, and more specifically to a new and useful rotary airfoil and design method therefor in the aviation field.
Aircraft that are propelled by rotating external surfaces, such as rotorcraft and propeller-craft, utilize rotating and often unenclosed blades (e.g., rotary airfoils) to produce thrust. However, rotating blades are a significant source of acoustic noise that is undesirable for aircraft use in several contexts, including urban and suburban environments, in which high noise levels can be disruptive. Noise-based flightpath restrictions can significantly reduce the ability to deploy urban and suburban air mobility systems.
Thus, there is a need in the aviation field to create a new and useful rotary airfoil and design method therefor. This invention provides such a new and useful system and method.
The following description of preferred embodiments of the invention is not intended to limit the invention to these preferred embodiments, but rather to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use this invention.
As shown in
The system can optionally include: a rotor hub 550 to mount the rotary airfoil, a tilt mechanism to pivot the rotary airfoil between a forward configuration and a hover configuration, and a pitching mechanism to change the angle of attack of the rotary airfoil 100 (an example is shown in
The rotary airfoil 100 functions to generate an aerodynamic force as it is rotated through a fluid (e.g., air), which can be used to propel and/or lift a vehicle (e.g., aircraft). The rotary airfoil 100 can also function to define, at a cross section, a lift coefficient at each angle of attack within a range of angles of attack that reduces and/or minimizes loading variations across the rotor disc of a propeller utilizing two or more rotary airfoils 100. The rotary airfoil 100 can also function to define a cross section that includes a feature (e.g., a bump) or geometry that localizes a boundary layer separation point along the chordwise direction at a range of angles of attack, as shown in the examples in
As shown in
The design method 200 functions to compute an airfoil shape (e.g., a cross-sectional shape, a shape of the variation of the cross-section along the span, etc.). The design method 200 can also function to parameterize the airfoil shape in a specified manner that enables iterative computational optimization of the airfoil shape. The design method 200 can also function to enable computational prediction of airfoil performance (e.g., via computational fluid dynamics/CFD). However, the design method 200 can additionally or alternatively have any other suitable function.
The rotary airfoil 100 is preferably implemented in conjunction with an aircraft propulsion system (e.g., propeller, rotor, etc.), which in turn is preferably implemented in conjunction with an aircraft. In particular, the aircraft is preferably a rotorcraft, but can additionally or alternatively include any suitable aircraft. The rotorcraft is preferably a tiltrotor aircraft with a plurality of aircraft propulsion systems (e.g., rotor assemblies, rotor systems, etc.), operable between a forward arrangement 510 and a hover arrangement 520 (as shown in the example in
The tiltrotor aircraft defines various geometrical features. The tiltrotor aircraft defines principal geometric axes, as shown in
The term “rotor” as utilized herein, in relation to the control system or otherwise, can refer to a rotor, a propeller, and/or any other suitable rotary aerodynamic actuator. While a rotor can refer to a rotary aerodynamic actuator that makes use of an articulated or semi-rigid hub (e.g., wherein the connection of the blades to the hub can be articulated, flexible, rigid, and/or otherwise connected), and a propeller can refer to a rotary aerodynamic actuator that makes use of a rigid hub (e.g., wherein the connection of the blades to the hub can be articulated, flexible, rigid, and/or otherwise connected), no such distinction is explicit or implied when used herein, and the usage of “rotor” can refer to either configuration, and any other suitable configuration of articulated or rigid blades, and/or any other suitable configuration of blade connections to a central member or hub. Likewise, the usage of “propeller” can refer to either configuration, and any other suitable configuration of articulated or rigid blades, and/or any other suitable configuration of blade connections to a central member or hub. Accordingly, the tiltrotor aircraft can be referred to as a tilt-propeller aircraft, a tilt-prop aircraft, and/or otherwise suitably referred to or described.
In a specific example, the rotary airfoil 100 is integrated into an electric tiltrotor aircraft including a plurality of tiltable rotor assemblies (e.g., six tiltable rotor assemblies), wherein each of the tiltable rotor assemblies includes a rotor that includes a plurality of blades configured according to the blade design described herein. The electric tiltrotor aircraft can operate as a fixed wing aircraft, a rotary-wing aircraft, and in any liminal configuration between a fixed and rotary wing state (e.g., wherein one or more of the plurality of tiltable rotor assemblies is oriented in a partially rotated state). The control system of the electric tiltrotor aircraft in this example can function to command and control the plurality of tiltable rotor assemblies within and/or between the fixed wing arrangement and the rotary-wing arrangement.
In a specific example, the rotary airfoil 100 can be integrated into the tilt-rotor aircraft described in U.S. application Ser. No. 16/409,653, filed May 10, 2019, which is incorporated in its entirety by this reference.
Variations of the technology can afford several benefits and/or advantages over conventional rotary airfoils and/or design methods therefor.
First, the inventors have discovered that conventional optimization of airfoil shapes to enhance aerodynamic efficiency can have adverse and counterintuitive effects on the acoustic performance of the airfoil and/or propellers utilizing a plurality of rotary airfoils (e.g., propeller blades). This can be caused by inflow conditions varying across the rotor disc (e.g., as shown in
Second, variations of the technology can provide efficient forward flight and reduce the acoustic profile of the rotary airfoil in hover for VTOL applications. In such variations, the rotary airfoil operates in different regimes of the lift coefficient curve in the hover and forward flight modes. In such variants, the rotary airfoil can be configured to operate within an acoustic range in the hover mode with a minimum dB level of: less than 30, 40, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 100, 105, 110, or any other suitable dB level; and a maximum dB level of 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 100, 105, 110, 115, 120, more than 120, or any other suitable dB level. In such variants, the rotary airfoil (and/or rotor or aircraft including the airfoil) can be configured to operate within an appropriate acoustic range in the forward mode with a minimum dB level of: less than 30, 40, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 100, 105, 110, or any other suitable dB level; and a maximum dB level of 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 100, 105, 110, 115, 120, more than 120, ranges therebetween, and/or any other suitable dB level. The acoustic range can similarly be determined by transforming this acoustic range into an EPNL scale (EPNdB), A-weighted (dBA), C-weighted (dBC), Z-weighted, CNEL, NDL, SEL, SENEL, Leq, Lmax, and/or other expression of noise level, measured at a distance of 0 m, 10 m, 25 m, 50 m, 100 m, 150 m, 200 m, 300 m, 500 m, 1000 m, and/or any other appropriate proximity; alternatively, the numbers discussed above for the acoustic range can be applied to the aforementioned noise level expressions.
Conventionally, aircraft operation in hover mode presents larger inflow variations due to ground effects (“dirty air”) which correspond to an increase in the noise profile due to loading asymmetry/unevenness. Because hover modes may be used near human-populated regions where it is most critical to reduce the noise profile to meet regulatory requirements and improve user experience, the acoustic profile conferred by variants of this design can be particularly desirable for hover mode operation in human- or civilian-facing applications. In such variations, the rotary airfoil incurs an efficiency penalty (e.g., ˜3%) in order to improve the acoustic performance during hover (e.g., during operation in the hover angle of attack range), where the lift coefficient curve has a shallower slope than the lift coefficient curve in the forward angle of attack range. This can result in minimizing the loading asymmetry/unevenness resulting from inflow variation, at the cost of increased drag. This effect can have compounding positive effects when combined with conventional means of improving the acoustic performance of a rotary airfoil, such as: tapering the blade along the length, twisting the blade to change the pitch angle along the length, angling the blade tip (e.g., anhedral angle, dihedral angle), optimizing the airfoil cross section for different Reynold's number ranges on different portions of the blade (e.g., lower Re on inner portion and higher Re on outer portion), and/or other conventional approaches to rotor to noise reduction. However, in such variations the rotary airfoil does not incur a significant efficiency penalty in forward flight—which represents a majority of aircraft operation. By operating in a forward angle of attack range during forward flight, high propulsive efficiency can minimize the cost of fuel and/or electricity supplied to the aircraft, minimize the number of refueling/recharging stops, reduce vehicle weight of energy storage systems, and/or improve the aircraft range. An example efficiency curve 300 for a rotary airfoil is shown in
Third, variations of the technology define an airfoil geometry where the point of flow separation does not shift as a function of angle of attack (e.g., in the hover range), or shifts less than a predetermined distance (e.g., less than 10%, 5%, 3%, etc, of the chord line) across all operational angle of attack ranges. This can reduce the drag influence of flow separation, allowing the aerodynamic stall and/or max lift condition 210 of the airfoil to occur at higher angles of attack (e.g., greater than 5 deg after semi-critical angle of attack) and resulting in gentle stall behavior 202 as shown in the example in
Fourth, variations of the technology minimize vibrations of the rotor blade to improve the acoustic performance of the blade with varying inflow conditions. Varying inflow can result from: ambient weather factors such as wind, pressure, ground effects, and other ambient influences; other rotors of the aircraft which can be located in any plane, which can be: coplanar with the disc plane, parallel to the disc plane, intersecting the disc plane, orthogonal to the disc plane, and/or in any orientation relative to the disc plane; and other sources of variable inflow. In such variations, the blade profile offers improved vibration characteristics, improved load distribution, and increasing rigidity in bending and torsion as a result of: tapering the blade along the length (as shown in the examples in
Fifth, variations of the technology can provide airfoils that define a small pitching moment. In such variations, the torque required to maintain a specified blade pitch within a range of variable blade pitches is reduced versus an airfoil that defines a larger pitching moment. Thus, variable-pitch propeller systems can be implemented, using such variations of the technology, with smaller and/or lower-torque variable-pitch actuators, and thus at reduced cost and weight.
Sixth, variations of the technology can provide airfoils that define smoothly varying and gentle stall behavior (e.g., a shallow roll-off of lift coefficient with angle of. attack above the stall angle, as shown in
However, variations of the technology can additionally or alternatively provide any other suitable benefits and/or advantages.
As shown in
The rotary airfoil 100 functions to generate an aerodynamic force as it is rotated through a fluid (e.g., air), which can be used to propel a vehicle (e.g., aircraft). The rotary airfoil can define a single airfoil cross sectional profile or multiple cross sectional profiles.
The rotary airfoil is preferably used in a propulsion system, wherein the propulsion system can include: a set of rotary airfoils, a rotor hub that mounts the set of rotary airfoils (e.g., 3, 4, 5, 6, or any other suitable number of rotary airfoils), a tilt mechanism that pivots the set of rotary airfoils between a forward configuration and a hover configuration, and a pitching mechanism 530 that changes the pitch angle 535 (and thereby the angle of attack) of the rotary airfoil 100 (e.g., as shown in the example in
The propulsion system is preferably used in an aircraft, such as a tilt-rotor aircraft, but can additionally or alternatively be used in any other suitable manner. In variants, the aircraft can include multiple propulsion systems (e.g., 4, 6, 8, 10, etc.) distributed about the aircraft body (e.g., evenly distributed about an aircraft center of gravity, unevenly distributed, etc.) or a single propulsion system. When the aircraft includes multiple propulsion systems, the disc plane defined by each propulsion system can be aligned or offset from one or more of the other propulsion systems on the same aircraft. The aircraft can be: manually controlled, automatically controlled, selectively automatically controlled, or otherwise controlled. The aircraft can be that disclosed in U.S. application Ser. No. 16/409,653, incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference, but can be any other suitable aircraft.
The cross section of the rotary airfoil 100 preferably defines a leading edge 150, a trailing edge 160, and a chord line 170 extending between the leading edge and trailing edge as shown in
The cross section of the rotary airfoil defines a thickness between an upper surface and a lower surface. In a first variant, the upper and lower surfaces are above and below the chord line, respectively, as shown in
The upper surface functions to manipulate the flow field of the inflowing air 101 such that the average velocity of the flow field is higher than that of the flow field proximal the lower surface and the average static pressure is lower. The lower surface (e.g., the pressure surface) functions to manipulate the flow field of the inflowing air such that the average velocity of the flow field is lower than that of the flow field proximal the upper surface, and the average static pressure is higher (e.g., in the hover configuration).
The rotary airfoil can have any appropriate thickness. The thickness for a cross section of the rotary airfoil is defined as the distance between the upper and lower surfaces at a chordwise location. The rotary airfoil can have any appropriate maximum thickness. The maximum thickness of the rotary airfoil can be a specific dimension, specific dimension relative to the chord length, or variable relative to the chord length along the span of the rotary airfoil. The maximum thickness 175 can be defined relative to the chord length or otherwise dimensioned (e.g., metric units). The maximum thickness can be: 0.050 L, 0.075 L, 0.100 L, 0.110 L, 0.115 L, 0.120 L, 0.125 L, 0.130 L, 0.135 L, 0.140 L, 0.150 L, 0.200 L, 0.25 L, <0.075 L, 0.05-0.10 L, 0.100-0.150 L, 0.120-0.130 L, 0.05-0.25 L, >0.25 L, and/or any appropriate thickness. The maximum thickness can occur at any appropriate chordwise location 176. Preferably, the maximum thickness can occur at a chordwise location of: 0.20 L, 0.25 L, 0.30 L, 0.33 L, 0.35 L, 0.36 L, 0.363 L, 0.365 L, 0.37 L, 0.40 L, 0.45 L, 0.50 L, 0.60 L, <0.20 L, 0.20-0.30 L, 0.30-0.40 L, 0.35-0.38 L, 0.40-0.50 L, 0.50-0.60 L, >0.50 L and/or any appropriate chordwise location.
The airfoil thickness preferably defines a camber line 172 extending between the leading edge and the trailing edge. The camber line preferably lies above the chord line, but can have any appropriate geometry. The camber line can define any appropriate maximum camber. The maximum camber 173 of the rotary airfoil can be a specific dimension, specific dimension relative to the chord length, or variable relative to the chord length along the span of the rotary airfoil. The maximum camber can be defined relative to the chord length or otherwise dimensioned (e.g., metric units). The maximum camber can be: 0.01 L, 0.02 L, 03 L, 0.05 L, 0.07 L, 0.10 L, 0.15 L 0.20 L, <0.01 L, 0.01-0.03, 0.03-0.05, 0.01-0.05 L, 0.05-0.07 L, 0.07-0.10 L, 0.05-0.10 L, 0.10-0.20 L, >0.20 L, and/or any appropriate camber. The maximum camber can occur at any appropriate chordwise location 174. Preferably, the maximum camber occurs between the leading edge and the chordwise location of maximum thickness, but can alternately happen between the trailing edge and the chordwise location of maximum thickness, at the same chordwise location as the maximum thickness, or at any appropriate chordwise location. The maximum camber can occur at a chordwise location of: 0.20 L, 0.25 L, 0.26 L, 0.27 L, 0.28 L, 0.29 L, 0.30 L, 0.31 L, 0.32 L, 0.33 L, 0.34 L, 0.35 L, 0.36 L, 0.363 L, 0.365 L, 0.37 L, 0.40 L, 0.45 L, 0.50 L, <0.20 L, 0.20-0.30 L, 0.30-0.40 L, 0.35-0.38 L, 0.40-0.50 L, >0.50 L and/or any appropriate chordwise location. The camber line can define any appropriate leading edge camber angle 156. The leading edge camber angle of a cross section of the rotary airfoil can be a specific dimension or variable along the span of the rotary airfoil. The leading edge camber angle can be: <1 deg, 0 deg, 1 deg, 2 deg, 3 deg, 4 deg, 5 deg, 7 deg, 10 deg, 12 deg, 15 deg, 17 deg, 20 deg, 30 deg, 45 deg, >45 deg, 1-5 deg, 5-10 deg, 10-15 deg, 15-20 deg, 20-30 deg, 30-45 deg, and/or any appropriate angle. The camber line can define any appropriate trailing edge camber angle. The leading trailing edge camber angle of a cross section of the rotary airfoil can be a specific dimension or variable along the span of the rotary airfoil. The trailing edge camber angle can be: <1 deg, 0 deg, 1 deg, 2 deg, 3 deg, 4 deg, 5 deg, 7 deg, 10 deg, 12 deg, 15 deg, 17 deg, 20 deg, 30 deg, 45 deg, >45 deg, 1-5 deg, 5-10 deg, 10-15 deg, 15-20 deg, 20-30 deg, 30-45 deg, and/or any appropriate angle.
The thickness of the airfoil can be measured perpendicular to the camber line (“American convention) and/or measured perpendicular to the chord line (“British convention”).
The airfoil thickness can define any appropriate upper camber 178 relative to the upper surface of the airfoil and the chord line. The maximum upper camber preferably occurs between the trailing edge and the chordwise location of maximum camber, but can alternately occur between the leading edge and the chordwise location of maximum camber, at the same chordwise location as the maximum camber, or at any appropriate chordwise location.
The airfoil thickness can define any appropriate lower camber 179 relative to the lower surface of the airfoil and the chord line. Preferably, the maximum lower camber occurs between the leading edge and the chordwise location of maximum upper camber, but can alternately occur between the trailing edge and the chordwise location of maximum upper camber, at the same chordwise location as the maximum upper camber, or at any appropriate chordwise location.
The airfoil thickness can define a semi-critical separation point 140, which functions to create a stagnating zone in the flow atop the airfoil, which thickens the boundary layer and pushes the effective trailing edge upwards away from the upper surface of the airfoil (e.g., as shown in
The semi-critical separation point can be defined for a range of attack angles and/or range of Reynold's numbers as shown in the examples in
The semi-critical separation point can be defined by one or more separation features arranged along one or more chordwise or spanwise points along the airfoil. The separation feature can define the semi-critical separation point before, on, or after the separation feature. Examples of separation features that can be used include: a sphere segment, catenoid, conoid, lune, wedge, cone, teardrop, and/or separation features with any other suitable geometry.
In a first variant, as shown in
In some variations, the lower surface of the airfoil can define a bump substantially as described above in relation to the upper surface. The bump can be identically shaped and positioned in relation to the bump on the upper surface of the cross section but can alternatively be asymmetrically shaped and/or positioned in relation to the bump on the upper surface (e.g., a more or less pronounced bump, positioned further towards or away from the leading edge than the upper bump, etc.). In further alternatives, the bump can be omitted from the upper surface and included solely on the lower surface.
In a second variant, the semi-critical separation point is related to the specific geometry of the cross section, such as: a change in curvature of the upper camber, a change in curvature of the lower camber, a change in curvature of the camber, local maximum in the camber, local maximum in the upper camber, and/or local maximum in the lower camber.
In a first example, the airfoil cross section is defined by Table 1. In a second example, the airfoil cross section is defined by Table 2. However, the airfoil cross sections can be otherwise defined.
In a first variation of the first example, the airfoil cross section is defined by a set of at least 5 points selected from Table 1. In a second variation of the first example, the airfoil cross section is defined by a set of at least 10 points selected from Table 1. In a third variation of the first example, the airfoil cross section is defined by every point in Table 1. In a fourth variation of the first example, each point is within a margin of the value in Table 1, where the margin can be: <0.0001, 0.0001, 0.0005, 0.001, 0.005, 0.01, and/or any appropriate margin. The margin can be the same or different for the chordwise position (x/L) and the thickness position (t/L).
In a first variation of the second example, the airfoil cross section is defined by a set of at least 5 points selected from Table 2. In a second variation of the second example, the airfoil cross section is defined by a set of at least 10 points selected from Table 2. In a third variation of the second example, the airfoil cross section is defined by every point in Table 2. In a fourth variation of the second example, each point is within a margin of the value in Table 2, where the margin can be: <0.0001, 0.0001, 0.0005, 0.001, 0.005, 0.01, and/or any appropriate margin. The margin can be the same or different for the chordwise position (x/L) and the thickness position (t/L).
In a third example, the rotary airfoil can define a first airfoil cross section defined by Table 1 and a second airfoil cross section defined by Table 2. The first and second airfoil cross sections can be associated with different spanwise portions of the airfoil, and/or combined with any other suitable cross sections. Between the first and second cross sections, the airfoil blade can include any suitable blending, interpolation, and/or other smoothing.
The rotary airfoil can define a span of any appropriate length (e.g., blade length). The span can be sized relative to a cross sectional chord length, independent of the chord length, and/or any appropriate length. The span can be: 5 L, 10 L, 15 L, 20 L, 25 L, 50 L, <5 L, 5-25 L, 25-50 L, >50 L, <5 cm, 5 cm, 10 cm, 25 cm, 30 cm, 35 cm, 40 cm, 45 cm, 50 cm, 60 cm, 70 cm, 80 cm, 90 cm, 1 m, 1.25 m, 1.5 m, 1.75 m, 2.5 m, 5 m, 10 m, 15 m, 20 m, 5-25 cm, 25-50 cm, 50-100 cm, 0.1 m-15 m, 1-2 m, 1-4 m, 5-10 m, 10-20 m, >20 m, and/or any other suitable length.
The rotary airfoil can define any appropriate pitch angle. The pitch angle can be static or variable. The pitch angle can be defined as the angle of the chord line with respect to the rotor disc plane at any appropriate spanwise position on the blade. In a specific example, the pitch angle is defined relative to a spanwise position of 75% the length (radially outward). The pitch angle of the rotary airfoil can be: <−15 deg, −10 deg, −5 deg, −5 deg, −4 deg, −3 deg, −2 deg, −1 deg, 0 deg, 1 deg, 2 deg, 3 deg, 4 deg, 5 deg, 7 deg, 10 deg, 12 deg, 15 deg, 17 deg, 20 deg, 21 deg, 22 deg, 25 deg, 30 deg, 35 deg, 45 deg, 60 deg, 90 deg, 1-5 deg, 5-10 deg, 10-15 deg, 15-20 deg, 20-25 deg, 25-30 deg, 30-35 deg, 35-45 deg, >45 deg, and/or any appropriate pitch angle. In a first variant, the pitch angle is variable via the pitching mechanism. In a second variant, the effective angle of attack is controlled by motor RPM, with different speeds corresponding to different effective pitch angles.
The rotary airfoil can define a twist angle along the span. The twist angle can be a change in the angle of the chord line (e.g., relative to blade geometry, relative to the rotor disc plane, etc.) across a spanwise segment of the rotary airfoil (e.g., across the full length of the airfoil) and/or otherwise defined. The (absolute value of) twist angle can be 0 deg, 1 deg, 2 deg, 3 deg, 4 deg, 5 deg, 7 deg, 10 deg, 12 deg, 15 deg, 17 deg, 20 deg, 25 deg, 30 deg, 35 deg, 40 deg, 45 deg, 50 deg, 10-60 deg, 20-50 deg, 1-5 deg, 5-10 deg, 10-15 deg, 15-20 deg, 20-25 deg, 25-30 deg, 30-35 deg, 25-35 deg, 35-40 deg, 40-50 deg, >50 deg, and/or any appropriate twist angle.
The rotary airfoil can define any appropriate spanwise geometry. Preferably, the upper surface of the rotary airfoil is generally in a vesica piscis geometry, but can additionally or alternately be tapered toward the tip, have constant cross sectional area, have variable cross sectional area, and/or have any other appropriate geometry. The taper angle can be the same or different on the leading edge, the trailing edge of the airfoil, on an inner portion of the rotary airfoil, and/or at the tip. In an example in
The tip of the rotary airfoil can have any appropriate geometry. The tip can be flat, rounded, or pointed, and can be a point, edge, face, and/or other appropriate geometry. The rotary airfoil can have any appropriate tip angle 198, as shown in
The rotary airfoil can have any appropriate twist angle 192, as shown in
The rotary airfoil can have any appropriate rotary airfoil mounting angle 197, as shown in
The rotary airfoil can be constructed with any appropriate materials using any appropriate manufacturing technique. The rotary airfoil can be composite (e.g., carbon fiber, fiberglass, etc.), metal, metal alloy, plastic, and/or a combination thereof (e.g., internal support members of different material/manufacture), but can additionally or alternately include any appropriate materials. The rotary airfoil can be solid, hollow (with a single or multiple cavities), and/or otherwise constructed. The rotary airfoil can have any appropriate mass. The rotary airfoil can be: <1 kg, 1-3 kg, 3-5 kg, 5-10 kg, 10-50 kg, 50-100 kg, 100-250 kg, >250 kg and/or any other appropriate mass.
The rotor hub rotatably mounts rotary airfoil blade(s). The rotor hub can mount any suitable number of rotary airfoil blades. There are preferably 5 rotary airfoil blades, but there can be 2, 3, 4, 6, >6 blades, and/or any appropriate number of blades. The blades can have any appropriate relative relationship about the axis of rotation. In a first variant, the blades are symmetrically mounted. In a second variant, the blades are mounted in the arrangement described in U.S. application Ser. No. 16/430,163, filed Jun. 3, 2019, which is incorporated in its entirety by this reference. The rotary airfoil blades are preferably radially mounted about the axis of rotation via mechanical bonding, fasteners, and/or other mounting technique. The rotary blades can be directly and/or indirectly mounted. The rotary airfoil blades can be partially and/or fully supported by the blade pitching mechanism and/or other component. The rotary airfoil blades can be integrated into the rotor hub (e.g., one component), separate from the rotor hub, and/or otherwise configured. In a first example, there is a separate power source connected to the rotor hub, such as an engine, rotor of a motor, or other power source. In a second example, the hub is integrated into the stator of an electric motor.
The optional pitching mechanism can change the angle of attack of one or more rotary airfoil blades on the rotor. There can be a single pitching mechanism or multiple pitching mechanisms (e.g., one per rotor, multiple per rotor, one per blade, etc.). The pitching mechanism can actuate blades independently or actuate multiple simultaneously. The pitching mechanism can be integrated into the rotor hub, connected/mounted to the rotor hub, and/or separate from the rotor hub. Preferably, the pitching mechanism can be electromechanically actuated, but can additionally or alternately be hydraulic, pneumatic, and/or ground adjustable (by a human operator or other input). The pitching mechanism can be variable between a finite or infinite number of positions. The pitching mechanism can be: a controllable-pitch propeller (CPP), a swashplate, a ground adjustable rotor, and/or other pitching mechanism.
The optional tilt mechanism 540 functions to transition the orientation of each rotor between the hover configuration and the forward configuration as shown in the example in
The tilt mechanism associated with each rotor preferably adjusts each rotor between the hover configuration and the forward configuration (e.g., in conjunction with transition of the aircraft 100 between the hover mode and the forward mode); however, in additional or alternative variations, adjustment can be performed by a single tilt mechanism associated with all propellers (e.g., a tilting wing rigidly fixed to each rotor mounting point), by a number of tilt mechanisms different from the number of propellers of the plurality of propellers (e.g., wherein a set of six propellers are subdivided into pairs, and each pair is transitioned by a single tilt mechanism between the hover and forward configurations), and/or otherwise suitably performed. In a first variation, the aircraft 100 includes six propellers and six tilt mechanisms, wherein one tilt mechanism of the six tilt mechanisms is associated with one rotor of the six rotors (e.g., the rotors and tilt mechanisms have a one-to-one correspondence). In another variation, two or more rotors of the plurality of rotors are coupled to a single tilt mechanism such that actuation of the single tilt mechanism transitions the two or more rotors between the hover and forward configuration (e.g., wherein two or more rotors are rigidly coupled to a wing, and the tilt mechanism rotates the wing about the pitch axis to operate the aircraft between the hover configuration and the forward configuration).
In variations, the tilt mechanism can displace the entirety of an electric motor and the rotor away from the airframe (e.g., wing, pylon, etc.), relative to the remainder of the propulsion assembly 120. Displacement is preferably performed by a tilt mechanism including a linkage (e.g., as shown in
In additional or alternative variations, the tilt mechanism can rotate the rotor itself to transition between the forward and hover configurations. In an example of the aircraft in such a variation, the tilt mechanism of a left outboard rotor assembly, the right outboard rotor assembly, the left rear rotor assembly, and the right rear rotor assembly each include a pivot that rotates each propulsion assembly between the forward configuration and the hover configuration.
In a specific example, the tilt mechanism is the tilt mechanism described in U.S. application Ser. No. 16/409,653, filed May 10, 2019, which is incorporated in its entirety by this reference. However, any other suitable tilt mechanism can be used.
However, the aircraft can additionally or alternatively include any suitable number of rotors associated with any suitable number of tilt mechanisms in any suitable manner.
The lift coefficient for a cross section of the rotary airfoil non-dimensionally defines the lift (e.g., perpendicular force) performance of the rotary airfoil, at a range of angles of attack (e.g., the lift coefficient is defined as CL(α)), in relation to the fluid density of the surrounding fluid (e.g., air), the fluid velocity, and a reference area (e.g., a surface area of the airfoil, a cross sectional area of the airfoil, the square of a salient length scale such as a chord length or span length, etc.). In variations, CL(α) is preferably shallow (e.g., has a minimal slope) within a desired angular range of operation (e.g., 8°≤α≤10°) such that any variation in effective angle of attack due to inflow variation results in a minimal variation in lift force generated by the airfoil (e.g., as shown in
The shallow slope of the lift coefficient in the desired angular region of the lift coefficient curve 201 can function to provide a psychoacoustic benefit during operation of a propeller utilizing two or more of the rotary airfoils defined by such a lift coefficient curve. For example, a shallow slope can attenuate higher harmonics of the acoustic output of such a propeller operated with its blades at an effective angle of attack within the desired range, which can provide a psychoacoustic advantage (e.g., without reducing the overall acoustic power output) and/or reduce the overall acoustic power output in potential exchange for a reduction in aerodynamic efficiency (e.g., which may result in a steeper variation of lift coefficient with increasing angle of attack). The acoustic benefit can be more pronounced at higher frequencies (where the output is also more psychoacoustically sensitive).
The variation of lift coefficient with angle of attack of the rotary airfoil also preferably exhibits shallow roll-off after the stall point in comparison with a different airfoil shape, as shown by example in
The lift coefficient curve preferably defines a max CL point 210 (corresponding to maximum lift) at a critical angle of attack 245. Below the critical angle of attack, the lift coefficient curve preferably defines a semi-critical angle of attack, corresponding to the onset of flow separation at the semi-critical flow separation point 220 on the upper surface of the airfoil.
The lift coefficient curve can define one or more slopes. Slopes for the coefficient of lift curve can be determined as: the derivative of the coefficient of lift curve at a particular angle of attack (e.g., of a function approximating the curve), by the slope formula (change in lift coefficient over change in angle of attack), or otherwise calculated. The slope formula can be applied over any appropriate step size. The step can be for the angle of attack: a single degree change in angle of attack, a range across the angle of attack (e.g., first angle of attack range, second angle of attack range), a fraction of a range across the angle of attack (e.g., ¼ of the second angle of attack range), a fixed step size in the lift coefficient (e.g., for a 0.1 change in the lift coefficient), and/or otherwise calculated. The slope of the lift coefficient can further define a rate of change of the slope, using the same, similar, or different technique as the slope calculation. The rate of change of the slope of the lift coefficient curve can be determined as the second derivative, across part of a region as a change between two steps of the slope curve (which can be overlapping or non-overlapping), across an entire region of the lift coefficient curve, or otherwise calculated. The rate of change of the slope of the lift coefficient curve can be determined as a statistical deviation from a line or curve, evaluating the curvature of the lift coefficient curve (minimum curvature, maximum curvature, and/or average curvature), and/or otherwise determined.
Below the semi-critical angle of attack, the airfoil operates in a first angle of attack range 250 (e.g., forward range). The lift coefficient curve defines a linear (or near-linear) regime within first angle of attack range, corresponding to attached flow over the upper surface of the airfoil. The first angle of attack range has sufficient width such that variable inflow over the rotor disc area does not result in significant pressure drag or inefficiencies (as shown in the examples in
Above the semi-critical angle of attack and below the critical angle of attack, the airfoil operates in a second angle of attack range 260 (e.g., hover range). The second angle of attack range preferably has a shallower slope of the lift coefficient curve than the first angle of attack range, and corresponds to separated flow over the upper surface of the airfoil between the semi-critical separation point and the trailing edge, but can alternatively have a steeper or the same slope as the first angle of attack range. The second angle of attack range can have a smaller, larger, or the same width as the first angle of attack range. The second angle of attack range is preferably separate and distinct from the first angle of attack range, but can additionally or alternatively overlap with the first angle of attack range. The second angle of attack range can abut (e.g., be adjacent to) the first angle of attack range, or be separated by a third angle of attack range. However, the second angle of attack range can be otherwise related to the first angle of attack range.
The second angle of attack range can have any appropriate characteristics on the lift coefficient curve. Preferably, the second AoA range is sufficiently wide such that inflow variations still have effective angles of attack which fall in this regime. Since the slope of this curve is shallower, the acoustic impact of resulting from these inflow variations is reduced. The second angle of attack range can have a width of: <1 deg, 1 deg, 2 deg, 3 deg, 4 deg, 5 deg, 7 deg, 10 deg, 1-4 deg, 4-6 deg, 6-10 deg, >10 deg, and/or any other appropriate width. The second angle of attack range can have a lift coefficient curve slope 265 defined relative to a slope of the lift coefficient curve over the first angle of attack range (m1) or defined independently of m1. The second angle of attack can have a slope of: 0.99 m1, 0.99 m1, 0.98 m1, 0.95 m1, 0.90 m1, 0.85 m1, 0.80 m1, 0.75 m1, 0.50 m1, 0.25 m1, 0.15 m1, 0.10 m1, 0.95 m1-0.99 m1, 0.90 m-0.99 m1, 0.80 m1-0.99 m1, 0.80 m1-0.90 m1, 0.50 m1-0.99 m1, 25 m1-0.99 m1, 0.25 m1-0.75 m1, 0.25 m1-0.50 m1, 0.10 m1-0.90 m1, >0 deg−1, 0.020 deg−1, 0.040 deg−1, 0.060 deg−1, 0.080 deg−1, 0.100 deg−1, 0.120 deg−1, 0.130 deg−1, 0.100-0.110 deg−1, 0.110-0.120 deg−1, 0.120-0.130 deg−1, 0.110-0.130 deg−1, >0.130 deg−1, and/or any other appropriate slope. Preferably, the lift coefficient curve is approximately linear across the second angle of attack range (as shown in the example in
Between the first angle of attack range and the second angle of attack range, there can be a third angle of attack range (e.g., flow transition region), which contains the semi-critical angle of attack. Preferably, the third angle of attack range corresponds to a sharp increase in the drag coefficient versus lift coefficient curve 410 (example shown in
In a first example the airfoil blade comprises a first airfoil cross section, the first airfoil cross section defining: a chord line defining a chord length L; a leading edge, comprising a leading edge radius between 0.002 L and 0.05 L; a trailing edge, comprising a trailing edge thickness between zero and 0.03 L; a maximum thickness between 0.07 L and 0.2 L and located between 0.2 L and 0.6 L along the chord line; and a maximum camber between 0 and 0.2 L and located between 0.2 L and 0.7 L along the chord line.
In a specific variant of the first example, the leading edge radius is approximately 0.006 L; the trailing edge thickness is approximately 0.005 L; the maximum thickness is approximately 0.12 L at the position of approximately 0.4 L along the chord line; and the maximum camber is approximately 0.024 L at the position of approximately 0.44 L along the chord line.
The airfoil cross section can further define a drag coefficient vs AoA curve 400, an example of which is shown in
However, the system can include any other additional components.
As shown in
Block S100 includes parameterizing the airfoil geometry and generating an airfoil shape based on the parameterization. Block S100 functions to determine numerical parameters that collectively define a functional description of the shape of the airfoil geometry (e.g., the shape of the airfoil cross section), and generating such a shape using the numerical parameters. Block S100 can also function to provide an input to subsequent Blocks of the method 200 (e.g., Block S200), as a starting condition for an iterative optimization of the geometry.
However, in alternative variations, Block S100 can include otherwise suitably parameterizing the airfoil geometry.
Block S200 includes determining the performance parameters of the airfoil shape. Block S200 functions to analyze the aerodynamic performance of the airfoil shape defined parametrically (e.g., in accordance with one or more variations of Block S100). Block S200 can include determining the lift coefficient, drag coefficient, and/or moment coefficient of the rotary airfoil; Block S200 can additionally or alternatively include determining any other suitable performance parameters (e.g., aerodynamic performance parameters, structural performance parameters, etc.). The outputs of Block S200 preferably include the performance parameter values at a range of inflow conditions (e.g., angles of attack, inflow velocity, fluid densities and temperatures, etc.); however, Block S200 can additionally or alternatively generate any other suitable outputs. The ranges for which the values are determined preferably include the range of inflow conditions expected for nominal and extreme operation of a propulsion system implementing the rotary airfoil; however, Block S200 can additionally or alternatively determine values of performance parameters across any suitable range of inflow conditions.
In variations, Block S200 can be performed numerically. For example, Block S200 can include numerically defining an airfoil geometry using the parameterization output of Block S100, and simulating the response of the airfoil geometry to various flow conditions using a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) airfoil-analysis program (e.g., Xfoil). In such variations, the outputs of Block S200 include numerically-derived estimates of the performance parameters (e.g., lift coefficient, drag coefficient, etc.).
In further variations, Block S200 can be performed using physical models. For example, Block S200 can include manufacturing a three-dimensional blade embodying the determined airfoil shape, and testing the three-dimensional blade at a range of inflow conditions in a physical airfoil assessment facility (e.g., wind tunnel). In such variations, the outputs of Block S200 include the directly measured performance parameters. In such variations, the three-dimensional blade can be manufactured using various methodologies (e.g., additive manufacturing, 3D printing, conventional machine tool operations, foam cutting, etc.) out of any suitable materials (e.g., non-structural materials suitable for aerodynamic modeling, structural materials, etc.).
Block S200 can additionally or alternatively be performed using a combination of numerical analysis and physical modeling. However, Block S200 can be otherwise suitably performed.
Block S300 includes optimizing the parameters of the airfoil geometry to achieve a performance threshold. Block S300 functions to iterate the airfoil geometry towards achieving the desired performance parameter values.
Block S300 can include prescribing a weight function in terms of the performance parameters, which are in turn related to the airfoil geometry by way of the analysis thereof to obtain the performance parameters (e.g., in Block S200). For example, the weight function can be defined as a function ƒ(CL). The weight function can additionally or alternatively be defined to include the slope of the lift coefficient with angle of attack, or otherwise suitably defined. However, Block S300 can additionally or alternatively include defining any other suitable weight function.
Block S300 can include minimizing the prescribed weight function, in order to determine the optimal parameters. Such minimization preferably includes minimizing an expression of the form ∫CD·ƒ(CL)dCL. Block S300 can, in variations, include minimizing an integral of the form
to account for minimizing the slope of the lift coefficient with angle of attack. However, the weight function can be otherwise suitably minimized. Minimizing can be performed using any suitable minimization or optimization algorithm.
Block S300 can, in variations, include performing iterative weight function prescription and/or minimization, while varying the values of the geometric parameters determined as an output of airfoil parameterization (e.g., Block S100). In such variations, the airfoil shape parameters can act as the independent variables of the optimization, and the output variables (e.g., dependent variables) are the performance parameters.
Block S300 is preferably performed iteratively until the output performance parameters converge to values below a performance threshold. In variations, the performance threshold includes a slope of the CL(α) curve, and in particular includes the slope of the curve in the operating range of angles of attack (e.g., between 7 and 11 degrees). In such variations, the threshold slope can have any suitable value (e.g., a zero slope, a minimal slope, a slope less than that generated by a flat plate airfoil, etc.). In additional or alternative variations, the performance threshold includes a roll-off slope of the CL(α) curve at angles greater than the stall angle. However, Block S300 can additionally or alternatively include performing Block S300 over a single iteration and/or without convergence to less than or equal to a performance threshold value.
Although omitted for conciseness, the preferred embodiments include every combination and permutation of the various system components, which can be combined in any suitable permutation or combination and/or omitted in whole or in part from variations of the preferred embodiments.
As a person skilled in the art will recognize from the previous detailed description and from the figures and claims, modifications and changes can be made to the preferred embodiments of the invention without departing from the scope of this invention defined in the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 17/083,069, filed 28 Oct. 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/708,280, filed 9 Dec. 2019, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/776,853, filed 7 Dec. 2018, each of which is incorporated in its entirety by this reference. This application is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 16/409,653, filed May 10, 2019, and U.S. application Ser. No. 16/430,163, filed Jun. 3, 2019, each of which is incorporated in its entirety by this reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3089666 | Quenzler | May 1963 | A |
| 4416434 | Thibert | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4652213 | Thibert | Mar 1987 | A |
| 5174721 | Brocklehurst | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5381985 | Wechsler | Jan 1995 | A |
| 6655631 | Austen-Brown | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6749401 | Vanmoor | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 8016566 | Agnihotri | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8221086 | Watts | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 9851723 | Builta | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 20200001995 | Yang | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200148347 | Bevirt | May 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20220297833 A1 | Sep 2022 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62776853 | Dec 2018 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 17083069 | Oct 2020 | US |
| Child | 17826163 | US | |
| Parent | 16708280 | Dec 2019 | US |
| Child | 17083069 | US |
