Rotary blood pump

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8684902
  • Patent Number
    8,684,902
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, December 4, 2007
    17 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 1, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
Various “contactless” bearing mechanisms including hydrodynamic and magnetic bearings are provided for a rotary pump as alternatives to mechanical contact bearings. In one embodiment, a pump apparatus includes a pump housing defining a pumping chamber. The housing has a spindle extending into the pumping chamber. A spindle magnet assembly includes first and second magnets disposed within the spindle. The first and second magnets are arranged proximate each other with their respective magnetic vectors opposing each other. The lack of mechanical contact bearings enables longer life pump operation and less damage to working fluids such as blood.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to the field of rotary pumps. In particular, this invention is drawn to bearings for various rotor and impeller architectures.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Typical rotary pumps utilize an impeller wherein the movement of the impeller is constrained in five degrees of freedom (two angular, three translational) by mechanical contact bearings. Some working fluids may be damaged by the mechanical contact bearings. Blood pumped through pumps with contact bearings can experience hemolysis, i.e., damage to blood cells. In general, a hydraulically efficient and power efficient pump that can handle delicate working fluids such as blood is desirable for some applications.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,234,772 B1 of Wampler, et al., (“Wampler”) describes a centrifugal blood pump having a repulsive radial magnetic bearing and an axial hydrodynamic bearing. U.S. Pat. No. 6,250,880 B1 of Woodard, et al. (“Woodard”) describes a centrifugal blood pump with an impeller supported exclusively by hydrodynamic forces.


Both blood pumps are based on an axial flux gap motor design. The pump impeller carries the motor drive magnets thus serving as a motor rotor. In both cases, the drive magnets are disposed within the blades of the impeller. Drive windings reside outside the pump chamber but within the pump housing that serves as the motor stator. Integration of the motor and pump enables the elimination of drive shafts and seals for the pumps. The pump/motors include a back iron to increase the magnetic flux for driving the impeller.


Both blood pumps suffer from hydraulic inefficiencies due at least in part to the large, unconventional blade geometry required for disposing the magnets within the impeller blades.


The natural attraction between the magnets carried by the impeller and the back iron creates significant axial forces that must be overcome in order for the pump to work efficiently. Hydrodynamic bearings can damage blood cells as a result of shear forces related to the load carried by the hydrodynamic bearings despite the lack of contact between the impeller and the pump housing. Thus exclusive reliance on hydrodynamic bearings may be harmful to the blood.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In view of limitations of known systems and methods, various “contactless” bearing mechanisms are provided for a rotary pump as alternatives to mechanical contact bearings. Various rotor and housing design features are provided to achieve magnetic or hydrodynamic bearings. These design features may be combined. The lack of mechanical contact bearings enables longer life pump operation and less damage to working fluids such as blood.


In one embodiment, the pump includes a magnetic thrust bearing. The pump includes a pump housing defining a pumping chamber. The pump housing has a spindle extending into the pumping chamber. A spindle magnet assembly comprising first and second magnets is disposed within the spindle. The first and second magnets of the spindle magnet assembly are arranged proximate each other with their respective magnetic vectors opposing each other. The pump includes a rotor having an impeller configured to rotate about the spindle. A rotor magnet assembly comprising first and second magnets is disposed within a non-bladed portion of the rotor. The first and second magnets of the rotor magnet assembly are arranged proximate each other with their respective magnetic vectors opposing each other. The relative orientations of the spindle and rotor magnet assemblies are selected so that the spindle and rotor magnet assemblies attract each other. The rotor may include a grooved bore. In various embodiments, a hydrodynamic bearing is included for radial or axial support or both.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which like references indicate similar elements and in which:



FIG. 1 illustrates a cross-section of a pump having a passive magnetic axial bearing.



FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of the passive magnetic axial bearing.



FIG. 3 illustrates center and off-center placement of the passive magnetic axial bearing.



FIG. 4 illustrates one embodiment of an impeller.



FIG. 5 illustrates one embodiment of the pump applied in a medical application.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 illustrates one embodiment of a centrifugal blood pump. The pump comprises a housing 110 defining a pumping chamber 112 between an inlet 114 and an outlet 116. Within the pumping chamber, a rotor 120 rotates about a spindle 130 protruding from a base of the pump housing. The rotor further comprises a bladed portion defining an impeller that provides the fluid moving surfaces. The impeller comprises one or more blades 121 that move fluids when the impeller rotates.


The terms “rotor” and “impeller” may be used interchangeably in some contexts. For example, when the rotor is rotating, the blade portion of the rotor is inherently rotating such that reference to rotation of either the impeller or the rotor is sufficient to describe both. When necessary, however, the term “non-bladed portion of the rotor” or “rotor excluding the impeller” may be used to specifically identify portions of the rotor other than the blades. Each blade of the rotor may separately be referred to as an impeller, however the term “impeller” is generally used to refer to a collective set of one or more blades.


The pump is based upon a moving magnet axial flux gap motor architecture. In one embodiment, the motor is a brushless DC motor. Drive magnets 122 carried by the rotor have magnetic vectors parallel to the rotor axis of rotation 190. In the illustrated embodiment, the drive magnets are disposed within a non-bladed portion of the rotor.


Drive windings 140 are located within the pump housing. Power is applied to the drive windings to generate the appropriate time-varying currents that interact with the drive magnets in order to cause the impeller to rotate. A back iron 150 enhances the magnetic flux produced by the motor rotor magnets. In one embodiment, either the face 124 of the bottom of the rotor or the opposing face 118 provided by the lower pump housing have surfaces (e.g., 172) contoured to produce a hydrodynamic bearing when the clearance between the rotor and the housing falls below a pre-determined threshold. In one embodiment, the pre-determined threshold is within a range of 0.0002 inches to 0.003 inches.


The natural attraction between the back iron 150 and the drive magnets 122 carried by the rotor can create a significant axial load on the rotor. This axial load is present in centrifugal pumps based on an axial flux gap motor architecture such as Wampler or Woodard. Woodard and Wampler both rely on hydrodynamic thrust bearings to overcome this axial loading force. Despite the lack of contact, hydrodynamic bearings can still damage blood cells as a result of shear forces related to the load carried by the hydrodynamic bearings.


The repulsive radial magnetic bearing of Wampler exacerbates the axial loads created by the magnetic attraction between the drive magnets and the back iron. Although the repulsive radial magnetic bearing creates radial stability, it introduces considerable axial instability. This axial instability can contribute further to the axial loading. This additional axial loading creates greater shear forces for any axial hydrodynamic bearing that can cause undesirable hemolysis for blood applications. In addition, the power required to sustain the hydrodynamic bearing increases as the load increases. Thus highly loaded hydrodynamic bearings can impose a significant power penalty.


The blood pump of FIG. 1 includes a magnetic axial bearing that serves to reduce or offset the axial load imposed on the rotor by the interaction between the drive magnets and the back iron. The axial magnetic bearing is formed by the interaction between a spindle magnet assembly 160 disposed within the spindle and a rotor magnet assembly 180 carried by the rotor. In the illustrated embodiment, the rotor magnet assembly 180 is disposed proximate the impeller, but the magnets of the rotor magnet assembly are not located within the blades. A set screw 134 permits longitudinal adjustment of the axial position of the axial magnetic bearing by moving the spindle magnet assembly along a longitudinal axis of the spindle.



FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of the axial magnetic bearing. The rotor magnet assembly includes a first rotor bearing magnet 282 and a second rotor bearing magnet 284 proximately disposed to each other. The first and second rotor bearing magnets are permanent magnets. In one embodiment, a pole piece 286 is disposed between them. A pole piece or flux concentrator serves to concentrate the magnetic flux produced by rotor bearing magnets 282 and 284. In an alternative embodiment, element 286 is merely a spacer to aid in positioning the first and second bearing magnets 282, 284 and does not serve to concentrate any magnetic flux. In other embodiments, element 286 is omitted so that the rotor magnet assembly does not include a spacer or a pole piece element.


In one embodiment, elements 282 and 284 are monolithic, ring-shaped permanent magnets. In alternative embodiments, the bearing magnets may be non-monolithic compositions. For example, a bearing magnet may be composed of a plurality of pie-shaped, arcuate segment-shaped, or other-shaped permanent magnet elements that collectively form a ring-shaped permanent magnet structure as shown in the chart 250 of FIG. 2.


The rotor axial bearing magnet assembly is distinct from the drive magnets 222 carried by a portion of the rotor other than the blades 221. In the illustrated embodiment, the drive magnets are disposed within the non-bladed portion 228 of the rotor.


The spindle magnet assembly includes a first spindle bearing magnet 262 and a second spindle bearing magnet 264. The first and second spindle bearing magnets are permanent magnets. In one embodiment, a pole piece 266 is disposed between them. Pole piece 266 concentrates the magnetic flux produced by the spindle bearing magnets 262 and 264. In an alternative embodiment, element 266 is merely a spacer for positioning the first and second spindle bearing magnets and does not serve to concentrate any magnetic flux. In other embodiments, element 266 is omitted so that the spindle magnet assembly does not include a spacer or a pole piece element.


In the illustrated embodiment, permanent magnets 262 and 264 are cylindrical. Other shapes may be utilized in alternative embodiments. The ring-shaped rotor magnets rotate with the impeller about a longitudinal axis of the spindle that is shared by the spindle bearing magnet assembly.


The permanent magnets of each of the spindle and rotor bearing assemblies are arranged such that the magnetic vectors of the individual magnets on either side of the intervening pole pieces oppose each other. Each side of a given pole piece is adjacent the same pole of different magnets. Thus the magnetic vectors of magnets 262 and 264 oppose each other (e.g., N-to-N or S-to-S). Similarly, the magnetic vectors of magnets 282 and 284 oppose each other.


The orientation of the magnets is chosen to establish an axial attraction whenever the bearings are axially misaligned. Note that the relative orientations of the spindle and rotor magnet assemblies are selected so that the spindle and rotor magnet assemblies attract each other (e.g., S-to-N, N-to-S). The magnet vector orientation selected for the magnets of one assembly determines the magnetic vector orientation for the magnets of the other assembly. Table 292 illustrates the acceptable magnetic vector combinations for the first and second rotor bearing magnets (MR1, MR2) and the first and second spindle bearing magnets (MS1, MS2). Forces such as the magnetic attraction between the back iron and drive magnets that tend to axially displace the magnet bearing assemblies are offset at least in part by the magnetic attraction between the axial bearings that provide an axial force to restore the axial position of the rotor.



FIG. 2 also illustrates wedges or tapered surfaces 272 that form a portion of a hydrodynamic bearing when the clearance between a face of the non-bladed portion of the rotor (see, e.g., bottom face 124 of FIG. 1) and the back of the pump housing falls below a pre-determined threshold. In various embodiments, this pre-determined threshold is within a range of 0.0002 inches to 0.003 inches. Thus in one embodiment, the pump includes an axial hydrodynamic bearing. The surface geometry providing the axial hydrodynamic bearing may be located on the rotor or the housing.


Although the spindle magnet assembly is intended to provide an axial magnetic bearing, the attractive force between the spindle and rotor magnet assemblies also has a radial component. This radial component may be utilized to offset radial loading of the impeller due to the pressure gradient across the impeller. The radial component also serves as a pre-load during initial rotation and a bias during normal operation to prevent eccentric rotation of the rotor about the spindle. Such an eccentric rotation can result in fluid whirl or whip which is detrimental to the pumping action. The biasing radial component helps to maintain or restore the radial position of the rotor and the pumping action, for example, when the pump is subjected to external forces as a result of movement or impact.


Instead of a spindle magnet assembly interacting with a rotor bearing magnet assembly to form the magnetic bearing, a ferromagnetic material might be used in lieu of one of a) the spindle magnet assembly, or b) the rotor bearing magnet assembly (but not both) in alternative embodiments.


The magnetic bearing is still composed of a spindle portion and a rotor portion, however, one of the spindle and the rotor portions utilizes ferromagnetic material while the other portion utilizes permanent magnets. The ferromagnetic material interacts with the magnets to create a magnetic attraction between the rotor and spindle. Examples of ferromagnetic materials includes iron, nickel, and cobalt.


In one embodiment, the ferromagnetic material is “soft iron”. Soft iron is characterized in part by a very low coercivity. Thus irrespective of its remanence or retentivity, soft iron is readily magnetized (or re-magnetized) in the presence of an external magnetic field such as those provided by the permanent magnets of the magnetic bearing system.



FIG. 3 illustrates various locations for the placement of the spindle portion of the magnetic bearing. In one embodiment, the spindle magnet assembly 360 is axially aligned with a longitudinal axis 390 of the spindle so that the spindle and spindle magnet assembly share the same central longitudinal axis. In an alternative embodiment, the spindle magnet assembly is radially offset so that the spindle and spindle magnet assembly do not share the same central axis. In particular, the longitudinal axis 362 of the spindle magnet assembly 360 is displaced from the longitudinal axis 390 of the spindle. This latter positioning may be desirable to provide some radial biasing force. A difference in pressure across the impeller tends to push the impeller radially towards one side of the pump housing. This radial load may be offset at least in part by offsetting the spindle magnet assembly.


Although the spindle and rotor magnet assemblies are illustrated as comprising 2 magnetic elements each, the magnet assemblies may each comprise a single magnet instead. A greater spring rate may be achieved with multiple magnetic elements per assembly configured as illustrated instead of a single magnet per assembly. The use of two magnetic elements per assembly results in a bearing that tends to correct bi-directional axial displacements from a position of stability (i.e., displacements above and below the point of stability) with a greater spring rate than single magnetic elements per assembly.


The magnetic force generated by the axial magnetic bearing will exhibit a radial component in addition to their axial components. The radial component will tend to de-stabilize the impeller. In particular, the radial component may introduce radial position instability for the magnetic bearing of either FIG. 1 or 2.


This radial instability may be overcome using radial hydrodynamic bearings. Referring to FIG. 1, the pump may be designed for a radial hydrodynamic bearing (i.e., hydrodynamic journal bearing) located between the spindle 130 and the rotor along the bore of the rotor. The clearances illustrated in FIG. 1 are exaggerated. Hydrodynamic journal bearings require narrow clearances to be effective. In various embodiments, the hydrodynamic journal bearing clearances range from 0.0005-0.020 inches. The surface geometries suitable for axial (thrust) or radial (journal) hydrodynamic bearings may be located on either the rotor or on an associated portion of the housing (or spindle). In one embodiment, the surface geometry includes features such as one or more pads (i.e., a feature creating an abrupt change in clearance such as a step of uniform height). In alternative embodiments, the surface geometry includes features such as one or more tapers.



FIG. 4 illustrates one embodiment of the rotor 400 including an impeller. The impeller includes a plurality of blades 420 used for pumping the working fluid such as blood. The rotor includes a bore 410. The rotor bore is coaxially aligned with the longitudinal axis of the spindle within the pump housing. Drive magnets (not illustrated) are disposed within the non-bladed portion 430 of the rotor (i.e., within the rotor but not within any blades of the impeller portion of the rotor). The motor rotor and pump impeller are thus integrated so that a drive shaft is not required. Elimination of the drive shaft also permits elimination of shaft seals for the pump.


In one embodiment, the rotor has a grooved bore. In particular, the bore has one or more helical grooves 450. The bore grooves have a non-zero axial pitch. The groove is in fluid communication with the working fluid of the pump during operation of the pump.



FIG. 5 illustrates the pump 510 operationally coupled to move a working fluid 540 from a source 520 to a destination 530. A first working fluid conduit 522 couples the source to the pump inlet 514. A second working fluid conduit 532 couples the pump outlet 516 to the destination. The working fluid is the fluid moved by the pump from the source to the destination. In a medical application, for example, the working fluid might be blood. In one embodiment, the source and destination are arteries such that the pump moves blood from one artery to another artery.


Various “contactless” bearing mechanisms have been described as alternatives to mechanical contact bearings for rotary pumps. In particular, rotor, impeller, and housing design features are provided to achieve hydrodynamic or magnetic bearings. These design features may be used in conjunction with each other, if desired.


In the preceding detailed description, the invention is described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof. Various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the claims. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.

Claims
  • 1. A pump apparatus comprising: a centrifugal pump housing defining a pumping chamber for pumping a liquid, the centrifugal pump housing having a spindle extending into the pumping chamber; and a spindle magnet assembly comprising a first and a second magnet disposed within the spindle, wherein the first and second magnets are arranged proximate each other with their respective magnetic vectors being parallel to an axis of rotation of a rotor of said pump;a rotor with a rotor magnet assembly comprising a third and a fourth magnet disposed within a non-bladed portion of the rotor, wherein the third and fourth magnets are arranged proximate each other with their respective magnetic vectors being parallel to said axis of rotation of said rotor,wherein said spindle and rotor magnet assemblies form a passive magnetic axial bearing wherein a relative orientation of the spindle and rotor magnet assemblies are selected so that the spindle and rotor magnet assemblies attract each other; and,a hydrodynamic bearing formed of a plurality of contoured surfaces between said housing and said rotor.
  • 2. The pump apparatus of claim 1 wherein the first and second spindle magnets have one of a cylindrical and a ring-shaped form factor.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the spindle magnet assembly further comprises a pole piece disposed between the first and second magnets.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein a longitudinal axis of the spindle magnet assembly is displaced from a longitudinal axis of the spindle.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the spindle supports a radial hydrodynamic bearing between the spindle and a bore of said rotor.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said rotor is configured to rotate about the spindle, the rotor including an impeller comprising at least one blade.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 6 wherein the rotor magnet assembly further comprises a pole piece disposed between the third and fourth magnets.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 6 wherein at least one of the third and fourth magnets has a ring-shaped form factor.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 6 wherein the third and fourth magnets are concentrically arranged about a bore of the rotor.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 6 wherein a bore of the rotor is grooved.
  • 11. The apparatus of claim 6 further comprising: a plurality of drive magnets carried by a non-bladed portion of the rotor; and drive windings carried by the pump housing, wherein the drive magnets co-operate with the drive windings to rotate the rotor.
  • 12. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said plurality of contoured surfaces include a plurality of discrete wedge-shaped surfaces.
  • 13. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said plurality of discrete wedge-shaped surfaces are disposed on said rotor.
  • 14. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein said passive axial magnetic bearing is adjustable along an axis of said spindle.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said pump is a centrifugal pump for pumping a liquid.
  • 16. A pump apparatus comprising: a centrifugal pump housing defining a pumping chamber for pumping a liquid, the centrifugal pump housing having a spindle extending into the pumping chamber;a rotor configured to rotate about the spindle, the rotor including an impeller comprising at least one blade;a rotor portion of a magnetic bearing disposed within a non-bladed portion of the rotor; anda spindle portion of the magnetic bearing disposed within the spindle,wherein the spindle and rotor portions of the magnetic bearing constitute a passive magnetic axial bearing,wherein at least one of the rotor and spindle portions of the magnetic bearing comprises a first and a second magnet, wherein the first and second magnets are arranged proximate each other with their respective magnetic vectors being parallel to said axis of rotation;a plurality of contoured surfaces disposed between said pump housing and said rotor forming a hydrodynamic bearing.
  • 17. The apparatus of claim 16 wherein the spindle portion of the magnetic bearing comprises first and second magnets arranged proximate each other with their respective magnetic vectors opposing each other, wherein the rotor portion of the magnetic bearing comprises first and second magnets arranged proximate each other with their respective magnetic vectors opposing each other.
  • 18. The apparatus of claim 16 wherein the spindle portion of the magnetic bearing comprises first and second magnets arranged proximate each other with their respective magnetic vectors opposing each other, wherein the rotor portion of the magnetic bearing comprises ferromagnetic material.
  • 19. The apparatus of claim 18 wherein the ferromagnetic material is soft iron.
  • 20. The apparatus of claim 16 wherein the rotor portion of the magnetic bearing comprises first and second magnets arranged proximate each other with their respective magnetic vectors opposing each other, wherein the spindle portion of the magnetic bearing comprises ferromagnetic material.
  • 21. The apparatus of claim 20 wherein the ferromagnetic material is soft iron.
  • 22. The apparatus according to claim 16, wherein said plurality of contoured surfaces include a plurality of discrete wedge-shaped surfaces.
  • 23. The apparatus of claim 22 wherein said plurality of discrete wedge-shaped surfaces are disposed on said rotor.
  • 24. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein said passive axial magnetic bearing is adjustable along an axis of said spindle.
  • 25. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein said pump is a centrifugal pump for pumping a liquid.
  • 26. A pump apparatus comprising: a centrifugal pump housing defining a pumping chamber for pumping a liquid, the pump housing having a spindle extending into the pumping chamber;a rotor configured to rotate about the spindle on an axis of rotation, the rotor including an impeller comprising at least one blade;a rotor portion of a magnetic bearing disposed within a non-bladed portion of the rotor;a spindle portion of the magnetic bearing disposed within the spindle, wherein the spindle and rotor portions of the magnetic bearing constitute a passive magnetic axial bearing,wherein at least one of the rotor and spindle portions of the magnetic bearing comprises a first and a second magnet, wherein the first and second magnets are arranged proximate each other with their respective magnetic vectors being parallel to said axis of rotation;a plurality of contoured surfaces disposed between said housing and said rotor and forming a hydrodynamic bearing;a plurality of drive magnets carried by a non-bladed portion of the rotor; and drive windings carried by the pump housing, wherein the drive magnets co-operate with the drive windings to rotate the rotor.
  • 27. The apparatus of claim 26 wherein the spindle portion of the magnetic bearing comprises first and second magnets arranged proximate each other with their respective magnetic vectors opposing each other, wherein the rotor portion of the magnetic bearing comprises first and second magnets arranged proximate each other with their respective magnetic vectors opposing each other.
  • 28. The apparatus of claim 26 wherein the spindle portion of the magnetic bearing comprises first and second magnets arranged proximate each other with their respective magnetic vectors opposing each other, wherein the rotor portion of the magnetic bearing comprises ferromagnetic material.
  • 29. The apparatus of claim 28 wherein the ferromagnetic material is soft iron.
  • 30. The apparatus of claim 26 wherein the rotor portion of the magnetic bearing comprises first and second magnets arranged proximate each other with their respective magnetic vectors opposing each other, wherein the spindle portion of the magnetic bearing comprises ferromagnetic material.
  • 31. The apparatus of claim 30 wherein the ferromagnetic material is soft iron.
  • 32. The apparatus of claim 26 wherein the rotor has a grooved bore.
  • 33. The apparatus of claim 32 wherein the grooved bore comprises at least one groove following a helical path about the bore.
  • 34. The apparatus of claim 32 wherein the grooved bore comprises a plurality of grooves.
  • 35. The apparatus of claim 34 wherein each of the plurality of grooves follows a helical path about the bore.
  • 36. The apparatus according to claim 26, wherein said plurality of contoured surfaces include a plurality of discrete wedge-shaped surfaces.
  • 37. The apparatus of claim 36, wherein said plurality of discrete wedge-shaped surfaces are disposed on said rotor.
  • 38. The apparatus of claim 26, wherein said passive axial magnetic bearing is adjustable along an axis of said spindle.
  • 39. The apparatus of claim 26, wherein said pump is a centrifugal pump for pumping a liquid.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/940,419 filed Sep. 14, 2004 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,431,688, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/504,233 of Wampler et al. filed Sep. 18, 2003, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (259)
Number Name Date Kind
1902418 Pilgrim Mar 1933 A
2356659 Aguiar Aug 1944 A
2649052 Weyer Aug 1953 A
2664050 Abresch Dec 1953 A
2684035 Kemp Jul 1954 A
2789511 Dobie Apr 1957 A
2935068 Donaldson May 1960 A
3080824 Boyd et al. Mar 1963 A
3420184 Englesberg et al. Jan 1969 A
3510229 Smith May 1970 A
3608088 Dorman et al. Sep 1971 A
3647324 Rafferty et al. Mar 1972 A
3753623 Wutz Aug 1973 A
3812812 Hurwitz May 1974 A
3860968 Shapiro Jan 1975 A
3960468 Boorse et al. Jun 1976 A
4082376 Wehde et al. Apr 1978 A
4135253 Reich et al. Jan 1979 A
4149535 Volder Apr 1979 A
4304524 Coxon Dec 1981 A
4382199 Isaacson May 1983 A
4392836 Sugawara Jul 1983 A
4458366 MacGregor Jul 1984 A
4540402 Aigner Sep 1985 A
4589822 Clausen et al. May 1986 A
4625712 Wampler Dec 1986 A
4645433 Hauenstein Feb 1987 A
4686982 Nash Aug 1987 A
4688998 Olsen et al. Aug 1987 A
4704121 Moise Nov 1987 A
4753221 Kensey et al. Jun 1988 A
4769006 Papantonakos Sep 1988 A
4779614 Moise Oct 1988 A
4806080 Mizobuchi et al. Feb 1989 A
4812108 Kotera Mar 1989 A
4817586 Wampler Apr 1989 A
4846152 Wampler et al. Jul 1989 A
4895557 Moise et al. Jan 1990 A
4900227 Trouplin Feb 1990 A
4902272 Milder et al. Feb 1990 A
4906229 Wampler Mar 1990 A
4908012 Moise et al. Mar 1990 A
4919647 Nash Apr 1990 A
4930997 Bennett Jun 1990 A
4944722 Carriker et al. Jul 1990 A
4944748 Bramm et al. Jul 1990 A
4957504 Chardack Sep 1990 A
4964864 Summers et al. Oct 1990 A
4969865 Hwang et al. Nov 1990 A
4984972 Clausen et al. Jan 1991 A
4985014 Orejola Jan 1991 A
4994017 Yozu Feb 1991 A
4994722 Dolan et al. Feb 1991 A
4995857 Arnold Feb 1991 A
5021048 Buckholtz Jun 1991 A
5036235 Kleckner Jul 1991 A
5049134 Golding et al. Sep 1991 A
5055005 Kletschka Oct 1991 A
5089016 Millner et al. Feb 1992 A
5092844 Schwartz et al. Mar 1992 A
5098256 Smith Mar 1992 A
5106273 Lemarquand et al. Apr 1992 A
5106372 Ranford Apr 1992 A
5112200 Isaacson et al. May 1992 A
5112202 Oshima et al. May 1992 A
5112349 Summers et al. May 1992 A
5129883 Black Jul 1992 A
5147186 Buckholtz Sep 1992 A
5171212 Buck et al. Dec 1992 A
5190528 Fonger et al. Mar 1993 A
5195877 Kletschka Mar 1993 A
5201679 Velte et al. Apr 1993 A
5209650 Lemieux May 1993 A
5211546 Isaacson et al. May 1993 A
5290227 Pasque Mar 1994 A
5300112 Barr Apr 1994 A
5312341 Turi May 1994 A
5324177 Golding et al. Jun 1994 A
5346458 Affeld Sep 1994 A
5360317 Clausen et al. Nov 1994 A
5360445 Goldowsky Nov 1994 A
5370509 Golding et al. Dec 1994 A
5376114 Jarvik Dec 1994 A
5385581 Bramm et al. Jan 1995 A
5405383 Barr Apr 1995 A
5437541 Vainrub Aug 1995 A
5449342 Hirose et al. Sep 1995 A
5451147 Sakagami et al. Sep 1995 A
5458459 Hubbard et al. Oct 1995 A
5470208 Kletschka Nov 1995 A
5505701 Anaya Fernandez de Lomana Apr 1996 A
5527159 Bozeman, Jr. et al. Jun 1996 A
5533957 Aldea Jul 1996 A
5588812 Taylor et al. Dec 1996 A
5595762 Derrieu et al. Jan 1997 A
5613935 Jarvik Mar 1997 A
5643226 Cosgrove et al. Jul 1997 A
5678306 Bozeman, Jr. et al. Oct 1997 A
5685700 Israelev Nov 1997 A
5695471 Wampler Dec 1997 A
5707218 Maher et al. Jan 1998 A
5713730 Nosé et al. Feb 1998 A
5722930 Larson, Jr. et al. Mar 1998 A
5738649 Macoviak Apr 1998 A
5746575 Westphal et al. May 1998 A
5746709 Rom et al. May 1998 A
5749855 Reitan May 1998 A
5755784 Jarvik May 1998 A
5776111 Tesio Jul 1998 A
5807311 Palestrant Sep 1998 A
5814011 Corace Sep 1998 A
5824070 Jarvik Oct 1998 A
5840070 Wampler Nov 1998 A
5851174 Jarvik et al. Dec 1998 A
5853394 Tolkoff et al. Dec 1998 A
5868702 Stevens et al. Feb 1999 A
5868703 Bertolero et al. Feb 1999 A
5888242 Antaki et al. Mar 1999 A
5890883 Golding et al. Apr 1999 A
5911685 Siess et al. Jun 1999 A
5921913 Siess Jul 1999 A
5938412 Israelev Aug 1999 A
5941813 Sievers et al. Aug 1999 A
5947703 Nojiri et al. Sep 1999 A
5951263 Taylor et al. Sep 1999 A
5964694 Siess et al. Oct 1999 A
6004269 Crowley et al. Dec 1999 A
6007479 Rottenberg et al. Dec 1999 A
6058593 Siess May 2000 A
6071093 Hart Jun 2000 A
6074436 Wang et al. Jun 2000 A
6080133 Wampler Jun 2000 A
6083260 Aboul-Hosn Jul 2000 A
6086527 Talpade Jul 2000 A
6123659 le Blanc et al. Sep 2000 A
6123726 Mori et al. Sep 2000 A
6132363 Freed et al. Oct 2000 A
6135943 Yu et al. Oct 2000 A
6139487 Siess Oct 2000 A
6155969 Schima et al. Dec 2000 A
6176822 Nix et al. Jan 2001 B1
6176848 Rau et al. Jan 2001 B1
6190304 Downey et al. Feb 2001 B1
6200260 Bolling Mar 2001 B1
6227797 Watterson et al. May 2001 B1
6227817 Paden May 2001 B1
6227820 Jarvik May 2001 B1
6234772 Wampler et al. May 2001 B1
6234998 Wampler May 2001 B1
6244835 Antaki et al. Jun 2001 B1
6245007 Bedingham et al. Jun 2001 B1
6247892 Kazatchkov et al. Jun 2001 B1
6250880 Woodard et al. Jun 2001 B1
6254359 Aber Jul 2001 B1
6264635 Wampler et al. Jul 2001 B1
6293901 Prem Sep 2001 B1
6295877 Aboul-Hosn et al. Oct 2001 B1
6368083 Wampler Apr 2002 B1
6387037 Bolling et al. May 2002 B1
6394769 Bearnson et al. May 2002 B1
6422990 Prem Jul 2002 B1
6425007 Messinger Jul 2002 B1
6428464 Bolling Aug 2002 B1
6447266 Antaki et al. Sep 2002 B2
6447441 Yu et al. Sep 2002 B1
6508777 Macoviak et al. Jan 2003 B1
6508787 Erbel et al. Jan 2003 B2
6517315 Belady Feb 2003 B2
6532964 Aboul-Hosn et al. Mar 2003 B2
6533716 Schmitz-Rode et al. Mar 2003 B1
6537315 Yamazaki et al. Mar 2003 B2
6544216 Sammler et al. Apr 2003 B1
6547519 deBlanc et al. Apr 2003 B2
6595762 Khanwilkar et al. Jul 2003 B2
6609883 Woodard et al. Aug 2003 B2
6610004 Viole et al. Aug 2003 B2
6623420 Reich et al. Sep 2003 B2
6638011 Woodard et al. Oct 2003 B2
6641378 Davis et al. Nov 2003 B2
6641558 Aboul-Hosn et al. Nov 2003 B1
6688861 Wampler Feb 2004 B2
6692318 McBride Feb 2004 B2
6709418 Aboul-Hosn et al. Mar 2004 B1
6716189 Jarvik et al. Apr 2004 B1
6749598 Keren et al. Jun 2004 B1
6776578 Belady Aug 2004 B2
6783328 Lucke et al. Aug 2004 B2
6790171 Gründeman et al. Sep 2004 B1
6794789 Siess et al. Sep 2004 B2
6808371 Niwatsukino et al. Oct 2004 B2
6817836 Nose et al. Nov 2004 B2
6860713 Hoover Mar 2005 B2
6866625 Ayre et al. Mar 2005 B1
6926662 Aboul-Hosn et al. Aug 2005 B1
6935344 Aboul-Hosn et al. Aug 2005 B1
6942611 Siess Sep 2005 B2
6949066 Bearnson et al. Sep 2005 B2
6966748 Woodard et al. Nov 2005 B2
6974436 Aboul-Hosn et al. Dec 2005 B1
6981942 Khaw et al. Jan 2006 B2
6984392 Bechert et al. Jan 2006 B2
7010954 Siess et al. Mar 2006 B2
7011620 Siess Mar 2006 B1
7022100 Aboul-Hosn et al. Apr 2006 B1
7027875 Siess et al. Apr 2006 B2
7070055 Lechanoine et al. Jul 2006 B2
7074016 Epstein et al. Jul 2006 B1
7122019 Kesten et al. Oct 2006 B1
7150711 Nüsser et al. Dec 2006 B2
7156802 Woodard et al. Jan 2007 B2
7160243 Medvedev Jan 2007 B2
7172551 Leasure Feb 2007 B2
7175588 Morello Feb 2007 B2
7241257 Ainsworth et al. Jul 2007 B1
7284956 Nose et al. Oct 2007 B2
7329236 Kesten et al. Feb 2008 B2
7331921 Viole et al. Feb 2008 B2
7335192 Keren et al. Feb 2008 B2
7393181 McBride et al. Jul 2008 B2
7476077 Woodard et al. Jan 2009 B2
7491163 Viole et al. Feb 2009 B2
7731675 Aboul-Hosn et al. Jun 2010 B2
7841976 McBride et al. Nov 2010 B2
7888242 Tanaka et al. Feb 2011 B2
20010031210 Antaki et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020151761 Viole et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020169413 Keren et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030135086 Khaw et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030208097 Aboul-Hosn et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030231959 Snider Dec 2003 A1
20040029842 Gardner Feb 2004 A1
20040101406 Hoover May 2004 A1
20040153104 Buckman et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040236420 Yamane et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050055038 Kelleher et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050069426 Mason et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050069435 Ikeya et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050095124 Arnold et al. May 2005 A1
20050095151 Wampler et al. May 2005 A1
20050165269 Aboul-Hosn et al. Jul 2005 A9
20060018943 Bechert et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060058869 Olson et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060226423 Yamasaki Oct 2006 A1
20070100314 Keren et al. May 2007 A1
20070203442 Bechert et al. Aug 2007 A1
20080103442 Kesten et al. May 2008 A1
20080103591 Siess May 2008 A1
20080306327 Shifflette Dec 2008 A1
20090023975 Marseille et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090060743 McBride et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090071137 Harris Mar 2009 A1
20090093764 Pfeffer et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090093765 Glenn Apr 2009 A1
20090093796 Pfeffer et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090171137 Farnan et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090182188 Marseille et al. Jul 2009 A1
20100087773 Ferrari Apr 2010 A1
20100191035 Kang et al. Jul 2010 A1
20110004046 Campbell et al. Jan 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (52)
Number Date Country
2 264 538 Feb 1998 CA
2 407 938 Nov 2001 CA
2 468 546 Nov 2004 CA
42 40 718 Jun 1993 DE
196 13 388 Oct 1996 DE
0 364 293 Oct 1989 EP
0 533 432 Sep 1992 EP
0 810 374 Dec 1997 EP
810374 Dec 1997 EP
1 481 699 Dec 2004 EP
1481699 Dec 2004 EP
2267800 Apr 1974 FR
48-23295 Mar 1973 JP
1-129898 May 1989 JP
2002-093120 Apr 1990 JP
2004-236818 Aug 1992 JP
2000-509311 Jul 2000 JP
2002-130177 May 2002 JP
2002-315824 Oct 2002 JP
2003-503639 Jan 2003 JP
2003-067310 Mar 2003 JP
2004-219496 Aug 2004 JP
WO 9119103 Dec 1991 WO
WO 9203181 Mar 1992 WO
WO 9405347 Mar 1994 WO
WO 9409274 Apr 1994 WO
WO 9413955 Jun 1994 WO
WO 9500185 Jan 1995 WO
WO 9715228 May 1997 WO
WO 9737698 Oct 1997 WO
WO 9841759 Sep 1998 WO
WO 9846879 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9901663 Jan 1999 WO
WO 9912587 Mar 1999 WO
WO 9937352 Jul 1999 WO
WO 9944651 Sep 1999 WO
WO 9953974 Oct 1999 WO
WO 0006701 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0012148 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0035531 Jun 2000 WO
WO 0038591 Jul 2000 WO
WO 0041612 Jul 2000 WO
WO 0064508 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0102724 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0124867 Apr 2001 WO
WO 0183016 Nov 2001 WO
WO 02070039 Sep 2002 WO
WO 03006088 Jan 2003 WO
WO 03048582 Jun 2003 WO
WO 03103745 Dec 2003 WO
WO 2005028000 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2006051023 May 2006 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (48)
Entry
G.H. Jang, et al., “Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of a Hydrodynamic Journal Bearing Considering the Effect of a Rotating or Stationary Herringbone Groove,” ASME Journal of Tribology, STLE/ASME Tribology Conference, San Francisco, California, Oct. 22-24, 2001, pp. 297-304.
G.H. Jang, et al., “Stability Analysis of a Hydrodynamic Journal Bearing with Rotating Herringbone Grooves,” ASME Journal of Tribology, ASME/STLE Tribology Conference, Cancun, Mexico, Oct. 27-30, 2002, pp. 291-300.
“Fluid Dynamic Bearings (FDB): New Technology to Replace Ball Bearings in Western Digital Hard Drives,” Western Digital, Jul. 2002.
International Bureau of WIPO, Search Report dated Feb. 14, 2005 for counterpart PCT Appl. No. PCT/US2004/029842.
IP Australia, Examiner's Report mailed Apr. 20, 2011 in Australian Patent Application No. 2007233078, 4 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowability mailed Mar. 23, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/565,651, 5 pages.
Japanese Patent Office, Second Office Action mailed Mar. 18, 2011 in Japanese Patent Application Serial No. 2006-526958, 16 pages.
IP Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Examiner's Report mailed Feb. 8, 2011 in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,579,637, 3 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed Jan. 25, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,328, 22 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed Jul. 23, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,328, 26 pages.
IP Singapore, Examiner's Report mailed Jun. 9, 2010 in Singapore Patent Application No. 200807202-7, 6 pages.
Japanese Patent Office, Office Action mailed May 19, 2010 in Japanese Patent Application Serial No. 2007-242976, 3 pages.
IP Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Examiner's Report mailed May 7, 2010 in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,579,637, 2 pages.
Japanese Patent Office, Office Action mailed Mar. 18, 2010 in Japanese Patent Application Serial No. 2006-526958, 5 pages.
WIPO, U.S. International Search Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jan. 7, 2010 in International Patent Application No. PCT/US09/55431, 14 pages.
IP Israel, Response to Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2009—Response filed Nov. 29, 2009 in Israeli Patent Application No. 174362, 3 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 5, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/937,109, 6 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed Oct. 20, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,328, 16 pages.
IP Australia, Examiner's Report mailed Sep. 14, 2009 in Australian Patent Application No. 2004273831, 2 pages.
Chinese Patent Office, Office Action mailed Jun. 2, 2009 in Chinese Patent Application Serial No. 2004-80034041.7, 10 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 16, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/937,109, 7 pages.
WIPO, U.S. International Search Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Feb. 24, 2009 in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/065717, 1 page.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 19, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/940,419, 5 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed Jul. 15, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/937,109, 6 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance mailed Jul. 10, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/937,091, 6 pages.
WIPO, U.S. International Search Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed May 16, 2008 in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/065717, 9 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed Jan. 24, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/940,419, 13 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed Oct. 22, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/937,109, 12 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed Oct. 9, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/937,091, 11 pages.
IP Singapore, Examiner's Report mailed May 2, 2007 in Singapore Patent Application No. 200601784-2, 9 pages.
WIPO, U.S. International Search Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Mar. 21, 2006 in International Patent Application No. PCT/US04/29842, 1 page.
WIPO, U.S. International Search Authority, Written Opinion dated Jul. 18, 2005 in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2004/029357, 8 pages.
WIPO, U.S. International Search Authority, International Search Report dated Jul. 18, 2005 in International Application No. PCT/US2004/029357, 5 pages.
Schmitz-Rode et al., “An Expandable Percutaneous Catheter Pump for Left Ventricular Support,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 45, No. 11, Elsevier Inc., Jun. 7, 2005, 8 pages.
WIPO, U.S. International Search Authority, International Search Report mailed Feb. 14, 2005 in International Patent Application No. PCT/US04/29842, 1 page.
WIPO, U.S. International Search Authority, Written Opinion mailed Feb. 14, 2005 in International Patent Application No. PCT/US04/29842, 3 pages.
Western Digital, Fluid Dynamic bearings (FDB): New Technology to Replace Ball Bearings in Western Digital Hard Drives, Jul. 2002.
Taiwanese Patent Office, Official Letter mailed Nov. 19, 1999 in Taiwanese Patent Application Serial No. 093128212, 7 pages.
Schima et al., “An Implantable Seal-less Centrifugal pump with integrated double-disk motor,” Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Vienna Austria, Jul. 19, 1995, pp. 639-43.
Jang, G.H. et al., “Stability Analysis of a Hydrodynamic Journal Bearing with Rotating Herringbone Grooves,” ASME Journal of Tribology, ASME/ STLE Tribology Conference, Cancun, Mexico Oct. 27-30, 2002, Apr. 2003, vol. 125, pp. 291-300.
Jang, G.H. et al., “Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of a Hydrodynamic Journal Bearing Considering the Effect of a Rotating or Stationary Herringbone Groove,” ASME Journal of Tribology, STLE/ASME Tribology Conference, San Francisco, California Oct. 22-24, 2001, Apr. 2002, vol. 124, pp. 297-304.
Takagaki et al., “A Novel Miniature Ventricular Assist Device for Hemodynamic Support,” ASAIO Journal, Jul., 2001, Abstract only.
Reitan et al., Hydrodynamic Properties of a New Percutaneous Intra-aortic Axial Flow Pump, ASAIO Journal, May 2000, Abstract only.
Sharony et al., “Cardiopulmonary Support and Physiology- The Intra-Aortic CAnnula Pump: A Novel Assist Device for the Acutely Failing Heart,” The Journal for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 118/ No. 5, Nov. 1999, pp. 924-929.
Nishimura et al., “The enabler cannula pump: a novel circulatorey support system,” The International Journal of Artificial Organs, vol. 22, No. 5, May 1999, pp. 317-323, Abstract only.
Verkerke et al., “Numerical Simulation of the Pulsating Catheter Pump: A Left Ventricular Assist Device,” Artificial Organs, vol. 23/ No. 10 1999, pp. 924-931.
Yamane, T. et al., “Design of Centrifugal Blood Pump with Magnetic Suspension,” Artificial Organs, 19, Mar. 1, 1996, pp. 625-30.
Verkerke et al., “The PUCA pump: A Left Ventricular Assist Device,” Artificial Organs, 17(5); 365-68; May 1993, Abstract only.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20080095648 A1 Apr 2008 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60504233 Sep 2003 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10940419 Sep 2004 US
Child 11950318 US