Rotary blower with an abradable coating

Abstract

An improved rotary blower (11) with an abradable coating (61) with a maximum hardness value of 2H on a pencil hardness scale. The coating material is a blend or mixture of preferably an epoxy-polymer resin matrix with a solid lubricant. The solid lubricant preferably is graphite. The improved abradable coating provides essentially zero clearance to increase the volumetric efficiency of a Roots type rotary blower.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates in general to an improved rotary blower with abradable coating for increasing the volumetric efficiency of the rotary blower, and in particular to an abradable coating for a rotary lobe-type pump, compressor, or blower such as a Roots type rotary blower, typically used as an automotive supercharger.

2. Description of the Related Art

Although the present invention may be employed with various types of pumps, blowers, and compressors, such as a screw compressor, it is particularly advantageous when employed with a Roots type blower and will be described specifically in connection therewith, but the present invention is not intended to be limited thereto.

Rotary blowers of the Roots type typically include a pair of meshed, lobed rotors having either straight lobes or lobes with a helical twist with each of the rotors being mounted on a shaft, and each shaft having mounted thereon a timing gear. Rotary blowers, particularly Roots blowers are employed as superchargers for internal combustion engines and normally operate at relatively high speeds, typically in the range of 10,000 to 20,000 revolutions per minute (rpm) for transferring large volumes of a compressible fluid like air, but without compressing the air internally within the blower.

It is desirable that the rotors mesh with each other, to transfer large volumes of air from an inlet port to a higher pressure at the outlet port. Operating clearances to compensate for thermal expansion and/or bending due to loads are intentionally designed for the movement of the parts so that the rotors actually do not touch each other or the housing. Also, it has been the practice to epoxy coat the rotors such that any inadvertent contact does not result in the galling of the rotors or the housing in which they are contained. The designed operating clearances, even though necessary, limit the efficiency of the rotary blower by allowing leakage. This creation of a leakage path reduces the volumetric efficiency of the rotary blower.

In addition to the designed operating clearances limiting the volumetric efficiency of a rotary blower, manufacturing tolerances do exist and can limit the volumetric efficiency. While reducing or even eliminating the manufacturing tolerances can improve the performance and efficiency of the rotary blower, it is not always feasible from a cost perspective.

To enhance pumping efficiency and reduce fluid leakage, it is known to coat one or more of the moving parts of a pump, compressor or rotary blower with a coating material such as a fluoropolymer, for example, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,806,387 and 4,806,388. While these flexible, thermoplastic type coatings can improve efficiency to some degree, there are still operating clearances which limit the efficiency of the rotary blower.

Still another approach to improving pumping efficiency is the use of a coating with an abradable material. An abradable coating is a material which abrades or erodes away in a controlled manner. An abradable coating is typically employed where there is contact between a moving part and a fixed part, or in some cases where there is contact between two moving parts. As the part moves, a portion of the abradable material will abrade to an extremely close tolerance.

Abradable coatings have found particular application in axial flow gas turbines. The inner surface of the turbine shroud is coated with an abradable material. As the turbine blades rotate, they expand due to generated heat which causes the tips of the blades to contact and wear away the abradable material on the shroud for providing the necessary clearance with a tight seal.

U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,554,020 and 5,638,600 disclose applying an abradable coating to a fluid pump like a rotary blower, compressor, or an oil pump. The abradable coating comprises a polymer resin matrix with solid lubricants having a temperature stability up to 700° F. with a nominal coating thickness ranging from 12.5 to 25 microns.

While such coatings have improved the volumetric efficiency of rotary blowers, there still exists a need for an improved rotary blower with an abradable coating that has good adhesion to the rotor, and yet has sufficient lubricity. In addition to having good adhesion to the rotor and sufficient lubricity, the abradable coating should be chemically resistant to automotive related solvents. The lubricating properties of the abradable coating permit a sliding motion between the coated surfaces with a minimum generation of heat while transferring the large volumes of fluid. The abradable coating should still be sufficiently soft so that if any coating abrades away there is little or no contact noise. It is also desirable that the abradable coating be capable of being applied in either a liquid or dry form to the rotors. The abradable coating should significantly increase the volumetric efficiency of a meshed lobed rotary blower by minimizing leakage due to operating clearances.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide an improved rotary blower with an abradable coating for increasing the volumetric efficiency of the rotary blower

Another object of the present invention is to provide for the use of an improved abradable coating for a lobed rotor of a rotary blower with a predetermined maximum hardness that has good adhesion to the rotor and sufficient lubricating properties.

Another object of the present invention to provide an improved abradable coating on the lobes of each rotor for providing essentially zero clearance to minimize any leakage therebetween for increasing volumetric efficiency of the rotary blower.

Another object of the present invention is to provide for the use of an improved abradable coating with sufficient lubricating properties to permit a sliding motion between the coated rotors with a minimum generation of heat when transferring large volumes of air.

Still another object of the present invention is to provide for the use of an improved abradable coating for a rotary blower which is sufficiently soft so that if any coating abrades away after a break-in period there is minimal, if any, contact noise.

A further object of the present invention is to provide for the use of an improved abradable coating that can be used for manufacturing an improved Roots type rotary blower in cost-effective, economical manner.

The above and other objects of the present invention are accomplished with the provision of an improved abradable coating on at least a portion of at least one of the lobed rotors in a rotary blower to increase the volumetric efficiency of the rotary blower. The abradable coating comprises a mixture of a coating matrix and a solid lubricant with a maximum hardness value of about 2H on a pencil hardness scale for providing an essentially zero operating clearance for the rotors in the rotary blower. This maximum hardness value achieves a good balance between hardness which offers good adhesion to the rotor and lubricity that permits the sliding motion between the rotors. Preferably, the coating matrix is an epoxy polymer resin in powder form mixed with graphite. The thickness of the abradable coating, prior to the initial break-in, is about 80 to about 130 microns, and preferably about 100 microns.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a side elevation view of a Roots type rotary blower of the type with which the present invention is preferably utilized.

FIG. 2 is a transverse cross-section taken on line 2 — 2 of FIG. 1 .

FIG. 3 is a transverse cross-section of one of the rotors employed in a Roots type blower.

FIG. 4 is a transverse cross-section similar to FIG. 3 except the rotor is depicted with straight lobes for ease of illustration and depicts an abradable coating thereon in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 5 is a view similar to that of FIG. 2 depicted with an improved abradable coating in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 6 is a performance plot of a conventional rotary blower and an improved rotary blower in accordance with the present invention at a pressure of 0.35 bar (5 psi boost pressure).

FIG. 7 is a performance plot similar to FIG. 6 except at a pressure of 0.69 bar (10 psi boost pressure).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Referring now to the drawings, which are not intended to limit the present invention, and first in particular to FIG. 1 , there is shown a rotary pump or blower of the Roots type, generally designated 11 . Rotary blower 11 is illustrated and described in greater detail, and may be better understood by reference to U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,828,467; 5,118,268; and 5,320,508 all of which are assigned to the Assignee of the present invention and hereby incorporated by reference.

As is well known in the art, rotary blowers are used typically to pump or transfer volumes of a compressible fluid such as air from an inlet port opening to an outlet port opening without compressing the air in the transfer volumes prior to exposing it to higher pressure air at the outlet opening. Rotary blower 11 comprises a housing assembly 13 which includes a main housing member 15 , bearing plate 17 , and the drive housing member 19 . The three members are secured together by a plurality of fasteners 21 .

Referring next to FIG. 2 , the main housing member 15 is a unitary member defining cylindrical wall surfaces 23 , 25 which define parallel transverse overlapping cylindrical chambers 27 and 29 , respectively. Chambers 27 , 29 have rotor-shaft subassemblies 31 , 33 , respectively mounted therein for counter-rotation, with axes substantially coincident with the respective axes of the blower 11 as is known in this art. Subassembly 31 has a helical twist in a counterclockwise direction as indicated by the arrow adjacent reference numeral 31 in FIG. 2 . The subassembly 33 has a helical twist in the clockwise direction as shown by the arrow adjacent reference numeral 39 in FIG. 2 . For purposes of explaining the use of the abradable coating in accordance with the present invention, the subassemblies 31 and 33 will be considered identical, and only one will be described in reference to the use of the abradable coating hereinafter.

Turning next to FIG. 3 , there is shown a cross-sectional view of rotor 39 . The construction and manufacture of rotor 39 is described in far greater detail in the above-incorporated U.S. Pat. No. 5,320,508. Rotor 39 comprises three separate lobes 43 , 45 , and 47 which connect together, or preferably are formed integrally, to define a generally cylindrical web portion 49 . Shaft 41 is disposed within a central bore portion 51 . Each of the lobes 43 , 45 , and 47 may define hollow chambers 53 , 55 , 57 , respectively therein, although the present invention is equally applicable to both solid and hollow rotors.

To facilitate a better understanding of the structure in accordance with the present invention and for ease of illustration FIG. 4 depicts rotor 39 as a straight lobed rotor. It should be understood that the present invention is equally applicable to any shaped rotor whether it is helical or straight lobed.

In FIG. 4 , there is shown an abradable coating 61 preferably covering the entire outer surface of rotor 39 ′. Coating 61 comprises a mixture of a coating material base or matrix which is preferably an epoxy polymer resin matrix in powder form, (also referred to herein as a powder paint material) which will be described in greater detail hereinafter, and a solid lubricant. Suitable solid lubricants include, but are not limited to graphite, CaF 2 , MgF 2 , MoS 2 , BaF 2 and BN. The coating mixture is then cured. Preferably, the surface temperature of the rotor is warmed to about 375° F. The coating has a temperature compatibility ranging from about −40° C. to about 200° C. The coating has a temperature stability of up to 400° F. The composition of coating 61 will be described in much greater detail hereinafter. As a minimum to provide at least some but are not limited to graphite, CaF 2 , MgF 2 , MoS 2 , BaF 2 and BN. The coating mixture is then cured. Preferably, the surface temperature of the rotor is warmed to about 375° F. The coating has a temperature compatibility ranging from about −40° C. to about 200° C. The coating has a temperature stability of up to 400° F. The composition of coating 61 will be described in much greater detail hereinafter. As a minimum to provide at least some increase in volumetric efficiency, the abradable coating 61 should cover, by way of example only, at least the area from one root radius (r 1 ) around the addendum to another root radius (r 2 ) of each lobe 43 , 45 , and 47 . More preferably, both rotors have the abradable coating 61 covering the entire outer surface thereof.

A conventional rotary blower without an abradable coating, as depicted in FIG. 2 , is designed with operating clearances ranging from about 6 mils to about 10 mils from rotor to rotor, and from about 3 mils to about 5 mils from rotor to housing (25 microns is approximately equal to 1 mil). The coating according to the present invention is deposited in a controlled thickness ranging from about 80 microns (μm) to about 130 (μm) with a thickness of about 100 (μm) preferred. The coated rotors can have clearances due to manufacturing tolerances that may range from rotor to rotor from about 0 mils to about 7 mils, and rotor to housing that may range from about 0 mils to about 3 mils. Preferably, the thickness of the abradable coating material on the rotors is such that there is a slight interference fit between the rotors and the housing. During the assembly process, the rotary blower is operated on line for a brief break-in period. The term “break-in” as used herein is intended to refer to an operation cycle which lasts as a minimum approximately two minutes where the rotary blower undergoes a ramp from about 2000 rpm to about 16,000 rpm, and then back down. Of course, the break-in period can include but is not limited to any operation cycle employed to abrade the coating to an essentially zero operating clearance. The term “essentially zero operating clearance” as used herein is meant to include but is not limited to the maximum operating clearance for a rotary blower that still provides a significant

As can be seen in FIG. 5 , the abradable coating 61 may optionally be provided on the cylindrical wall surfaces 23 ′ and 25 ′ (shown in dashed lines).

The coating is preferably applied with an electrostatic or air atomized spray process, but may also be applied with a liquid process such as a liquid spraying, dipping, or rolling process. Even though a spray coating process applied with an evaporative vehicle enables improved thickness uniformity and repeatability compared to the electrostatic powder coating process, an environmental concern is volatile organic compounds (VOC). The VOC content is preferably less than 0.5 lbs./gallon. The adhesion of the coating on the rotor or cylindrical wall surface can be improved with surface preparation of the substrate by mechanical means such as machining, sanding, grit blasting or the like, or alternatively with chemical means for surface treatment such as etching, degreasing, solvent cleaning or chemical treatment such as an alkaline or phosphate wash, all of which is well known in the coating art.

It is desirable for the coating to maintain its structure without peeling at contact areas, and to have good adhesion to aluminum or other lightweight metals. Also, the abradable coating material should not be harmful to the catalytic converter or the heat exhaust gas oxygen (HEGO) sensor if any particles become entrained into the engine after the break-in period. As such, the coating particles do need to be combustible. In addition, the coating also should have compatibility with gasoline, oil, water, alcohol, exhaust gas, Nye® #605 synthetic lubricating oil; Nye is a registered trademark of William F. Nye, Inc., oil or any other automotive solvent.

In the development of the blower which uses the preferred abradable powder coating material of the present invention, a variety of coating materials were investigated. Table 1 lists the results of several of these coating materials.

TABLE I
COATING MATERIALS
	DESIRED PARAMETER	ONE PART URETHANE	TWO PART URETHANE
PRODUCT		1 prt-latex +	2 prt polyester
DESCRIPTION		polycarbarbonate	urethane + add
		urethane + add	graphite or PTFE
		graphite or PTFE
APPLICATIONS		tailor to Rotor	tailor to Rotor
		needs	needs
NOMINAL	0.0015″ min,	0.002″ one	0.002″ one
THICKNESS	no max	coat	coat
OPERATING	−40 to 160 C.	˜390 F.	˜390 F.
TEMPERATURE	(−40 to 320 F.)
CHEMICAL	EGR (exhaust), water,	good/adjustable	very good
RESISTANCE	oil, fuel, grease
ABRADABILITY	Abrade quickly during	yes - pigment will	Urethane may be too
	break-in so contact	modify, tailorable	flexible, - pigment
	discontinues.		may improve
LUBRICITY	Minimize squeal	yes - from pigment -	yes - from pigment -
	during contact	tailorable	tailorable
THICKNESS	+, −0.0005″	process dependant	process dependant
UNIFORMITY AND
REPEATABILITY
ADHESION TO	Must stick in non-	adjustable with	very good
ALUMINUM	contact areas	urethane content
	permanently
SURFACE	Prefer phosphate	phosphate wash	phosphate wash
PREPARATION	wash only
PROCESS	Dip Or Spray + Bake	Spray	mix at nozzle spray
MAXIMUM CURE	400 F. (350 F.	force air dry	force air dry
TEMP	better)	˜150 F.	˜150 F.
ENVIRONMENTAL	Water based is best.	1.5 lb/gal VOC	˜zero VOC
FACTORS	Low VOC's are
	preferred
		SAMPLE 1	SAMPLE 2	SAMPLE 3	SAMPLE 4
	PRODUCT	RTV silicone	Silicone +	Waterborne	Water based,
	DESCRIPTION	+ add	add graphite	solid film	resin bonded,
		Graphite		lubricant +	lubricant
				MoS 2	coating with
					PTFE
	APPLICATIONS	Electronics		Solid film	Sol. Film Lube
		protection		lube
	NOMINAL	.002 +/	.002 +/	Poss	.0008-.001″
	THICKNESS	coat	coat	0.015/coat	coat (0.002
					max)
	OPERATING	OK	1000 F.	Ok	Ok
	TEMPERATURE
	CHEMICAL	Expected	Expected	Expected	Ok Expected
	RESISTANCE
	ABRADABILITY	Yes	Yes	Designed	Designed to
				to stay	stay
	LUBRICITY	Ok	Ok	Good	Good
	THICKNESS	process	process	process	process
	UNIFORMITY AND	dependant	dependant	dependant	dependant
	REPEATABILITY
	ADHESION TO	Ok	Ok	Should be	Expected
	ALUMINUM			Ok
	SURFACE			phosphate	Degrease
	PREPARATION
	PROCESS	Spray,	Spray	Spray	Spray/dip
		moisture cures
		in ˜20 min
	MAXIMUM CURE		Ambient to	300-400	300 F. 30 min
	TEMP		120 F.	60 min.
	ENVIRONMENTAL	1 +	0.46 lb/gal	2 lb/gal	2 lb/gal
	FACTORS	thinner prod-	VOC
		uct = ˜1

The results in Table 1 show that a variety of materials may be employed to produce an abradable coating, for example, urethane works well with graphite or waxy fluoropolymer additives for abradability and lubricity.

The urethane used in the coating matrix is commercially available from Freda, Inc. Two different types of water based urethane systems were tested as a coating matrix: a one-part urethane, and a two-part urethane. Urethane resins, which contain polyols, become crosslinked polymeric structures when isocyanates react with polyols. Polyols can be acrylics, carboxyls, polyesters, or other monomer groups that have reactive hydroxyl (OH) sites. This crosslinking reaction occurs at room temperature, and can be accelerated by heating to approximately the 150° F. temperature range. Curing above approximately 190° F. leads to swelling of the coating, and should be avoided. Once urethanes are cured, they are dimensionally and chemically stable up to about 350° F. or higher.

One-part urethanes are basically a water based system with polycarbonates and with 5 to 10% (on a volume basis) polyurethane added. The two-part urethane system is also a water based system with polyester polyol and fillers. The two-part urethane system has better adhesion, flexibility, and chemical resistance compared to the one-part urethane system.

Silicone based industrial coatings are also commercially available, but a possible concern is that silicone based oils may damage HEGO sensors. These relatively soft base materials cure quickly after spraying and are similar to room temperature vulcanized rubber (RTV). Silicone based coatings may be loaded with fillers for abradability and lubricity, and have excellent temperature resistance (<about 500° F.) as well as good chemical resistance. If any abraded material remaining after the break-in period enters the combustion chamber, it combusts into a substance like silica (SiO 2 ).

While the coating matrix materials in Table 1 are alternate embodiments for the coating matrix of the abradable powder coating used in accordance with the present invention, Table II lists several preferred coating matrix materials and their characteristics. The silicone co-polymer base coating matrix is commercially available from Dampney Company Inc., and the silicone polymer base coating matrix is commercially available from Elpaco Coatings Corp. The water-based resin bonded lubricant coating is available from Acheson Colloids Company. The waterborne solid film lubricant and MoS 2 is commercially available from Sandstrom Products Company. Of these materials, the most preferable coating matrix is the epoxy-polymer resin matrix in powder form, also commonly referred to as an epoxy powder paint material. The epoxy-polymer resin matrix is mixed with graphite powder. The preferred coating material is commercially available from Flow Coatings LLC of Waterford, Michigan, Catalog #APC-2000. The preferred coating material has a median particle size of approximately 30 microns. During the curing process, particles link together to create a coarse spongy layer that easily abrades. When the particle size is less than about 10 microns, during the curing step, the powder turns to a liquid and flows out which causes the coating to form a continuous sheet. This type of coating may still be used, but is not preferred.

TABLE II
COATING MATERIALS
				SILICONE CO-
			EPOXY + GRAPHITE	POLYMER +	SILICONE POLY-
CHARACTERISTIC	REQUIREMENT	EPOXY POWDER	POWDER	GRAPHITE	MER + GRAPHITE
Functional/		Epoxy cure	Epoxy cure
Performance
Coating Thickness	0.0024 in (63 μm)	2 to 4 mils	2 to ˜6 mils	2 to ˜5 mills	2 to ˜3 mils
Prevent Galling/	Line to line	OK	OK	OK	OK
Seizing in	aluminum stack-up
Contact Event	design prevents
	galling also
Minimize Noise,	Should abrade or	Contact noise is	Abrasion is expected	Observation - noise	Observation - noise
Slap & Squeal	conform at contact	persistent because	to quickly improve	not problem at	not problem at
during contact	areas so noise	coating remains	noise at tight	tight gaps due to	tight gaps due to
	ceases during end		timing gaps	abrasion	abrasion
	of line testing
Temperature	−40 to +	OK	−40 + 160 C.	−40 + 160 C.	−40 + 160 C.
Stability	160 C.		OK, Expected	OK, Expected	OK, Expected
Chemical	Water, antifreeze,	Excellent	Excellent	OK - slightly more	OK - slightly more
resistance	oil, Nye 605, gas,			abradable while wet	abradable while wet
	EGR exhaust, Rheotemp			with gasoline	with gasoline
	500, alcohols
System	Ok for engine, Ox	OK	Expected OK	Expected OK	Expected OK
Compatibility	sensor, catalyst
Stability	No water absorption,	OK	OK - poss absorption	OK - poss absorption	OK - poss absorption
	no creep, shrink		if same porosity is	if same porosity is	if porosity
			present	present
Adhesion strength	ASTM D3359, Stick to	Excellent	Adequate	Adequate	Adequate
	18K RPM
Hardness	Softer than base Al	Very Hard - can smear,	Hard, but readily	Readily abradable,	Readily abradable,
	alloy. Must abrade/	but does not abrade	abradable through	can flake off in	can flake off in
	conform		roughness layer	heavy contact.	heavy contact
			can flake
Expansion	Al 2.1-2.3 ee-6/	OK	OK	OK	OK
Compatibility	deg C.
with Al
Surface finish/	Rough may be best	Like eggshell, glossy	Always rough - as	Smooth or rough	Smooth or rough
roughness			80 grit
Color	No Requirement	Silver-grey	Black	Black	Black
Process Type	Uniformity & Robust	Electrostatic Spray	Electrostatic Spray	Liquid Spray HVLP	Liquid Spray HVLP
Environmental/	<0.5 lb/gal VOC/	No VOC's/	No VOC's/	Low enough VOC's/	Low enough VOC's/
Health Concern	health requirements	Health OK	Health OK	Health Looks OK	Health Looks OK
	TBD
Cure Requirements	No Metallurgical	1 min IR, 7 min. @	1 min IR, 7 min.	Flash off all water,	Flash off all water,
	Change, No movement	350 F. convection,	@ 350 F.	10 min at 300 F.	10 min at 300 F.
	on shaft, ,350 F.,	some movement on	convection
	lower is best	shaft
Surface Preparation	No grit, prefer	Baseline-phosphate	Baseline process	Baseline process	Baseline process
	alkaline/phosphate	wash & sealer	OK	OK	OK
	wash and sealer

As mentioned earlier, one of the key ingredients in the coating matrix is the solid lubricant. The solid lubricant functions as a filler with lubricating properties. Adding large amounts of graphite to the coating matrix provides a lubricating effect. However, the amount of graphite added also affects the hardness of the coating, i.e., the higher the graphite content the lower the coating hardness. The softer coating generates less noise if contact occurs, but the addition of too much graphite to the coating can affect adhesion and result in delamination during high-speed rotation. Consequently, a balance is necessary to achieve good adhesion and suitable hardness. The graphite content controls the abradability, adhesion, and flake resistance of the abradable coating.

For purposes of the present invention, hardness value is measured according to American Society of Testing Material ASTM D-3363 which is referred to as “pencil hardness”. The term “pencil hardness” as used herein is meant to include but not be limited to a surface hardness defined by the hardest pencil grade that just fails to mar the painted or coated surface. The abradable coating according to the present invention has a maximum hardness value of approximately 2H. The minimum hardness value is approximately 4B. A preferred hardness value is approximately B. A more preferred hardness value is approximately 2B.

Advantageously, the abradable coating provides a significant increase in the volumetric efficiency of the rotary blower as shown in FIGS. 6 and 7 . FIG. 6 is a graph of volumetric efficiency in percent versus the speed in revolutions per minute (rpm) for a conventional rotary blower (labeled “conventional”) without the abradable coating as shown in the lower plot on the graph, and an improved rotary blower (labeled “improved”) with the abradable powder coating in accordance with the present invention. At a low speed of approximately 4,000 rpm, there is approximately a 15 percent increase in volumetric efficiency. Even more positive results (approximately a 30 percent increase) are obtained at a higher pressure of 0.69 bar as shown in FIG. 7 .

While specific embodiments of the invention have been shown and described in detail, to illustrate the application and the principles of the invention, it will be understood that the invention may be embodied otherwise departing from such principles.

Claims

1. In a rotary blower having a pair of meshed, lobed rotors, the improvement comprises an abradable coating on at least a portion of at least one of the lobed rotors for providing an essentially zero operating clearance for increasing a volumetric efficiency of the rotary blower, said abradable coating being a mixture of a coating matrix and a solid lubricant, said coating matrix having a VOC of less than or equal to about 0.5 lb/gal, said abradable coating having a maximum hardness value of approximately 2H on the pencil hardness scale, and said abradable coating having a temperature stability of up to about 400° F.

2. The improved rotary blower as recited in claim 1, wherein said abradable coating comprises a minimum hardness value of approximately 4B on the pencil hardness scale.

3. The improved rotary blower as recited in claim 1, wherein said abradable coating has a thickness ranging from about 80 microns to about 130 microns.

4. The improved rotary blower as recited in claim 3, wherein said abradable coating is approximately 100 microns thick.

5. The improved rotary blower as recited in claim 1, wherein said coating material of said abradable coating comprises an epoxy powder.

6. The improved rotary blower as recited in claim 5, wherein said solid lubricant comprises graphite.

7. The improved rotary blower as recited in claim 1, wherein said coating matrix is a member selected from the group consisting of an epoxy, a urethane, a silicone polymer, and a silicone co-polymer.

8. The improved rotary blower as recited in claim 1, wherein said abradable coating has a hardness value of approximately 2B on the pencil hardness scale.

9. The improved rotary blower as recited in claim 1, wherein said abradable coating has a hardness value of approximately B on the pencil hardness scale.

10. In a rotary blower having a pair of meshed, lobed rotors, the improvement comprises an abradable coating on at least a portion of at least one of the lobed rotors for providing an essentially zero operating clearance for increasing a volumetric efficiency of the rotary blower, said abradable coating being a mixture of an abradable powder coating matrix and a solid lubricant, said coating matrix having a VOC of less than or equal to about 0.5 lb/gal, said abradable coating having a maximum hardness value of approximately 2H on the pencil hardness scale.

11. The improved rotary blower as recited in claim 10, wherein said abradable coating comprises a minimum hardness value of approximately 4B on the pencil hardness scale.

12. The improved rotary blower as recited in claim 10, wherein said abradable coating has a thickness ranging from about 80 microns to about 130 microns.

13. The improved rotary blower as recited in claim 12, wherein said abradable coating is approximately 100 microns thick.

14. The improved rotary blower as recited in claim 10, wherein said abradable powder coating material of said abradable coating comprises an epoxy powder.

15. The improved rotary blower as recited in claim 10, wherein said solid lubricant comprises graphite.

16. The improved rotary blower as recited in claim 10, wherein said abradable coating has a hardness value of approximately 2B on the pencil hardness scale.

17. The improved rotary blower as recited in claim 10, wherein said abradable coating has a hardness value of approximately B on the pencil hardness scale.

18. In a rotary blower having a pair of meshed, lobed rotors, the improvement comprises an abradable coating on at least a portion of at least one of the lobed rotors for providing an essentially zero operating clearance for increasing a volumetric efficiency of the rotary blower, said abradable coating being a mixture of a coating matrix and a solid lubricant, said abradable coating having a maximum hardness value of approximately 2H on the pencil hardness scale, said abradable coating having a particle size greater than 10 microns, and said coating matrix has a VOC of less than or equal to about 0.5 lb/gal.

19. The improved rotary blower as recited in claim 18, wherein said abradable coating comprises a minimum hardness value of approximately 4B on the pencil hardness scale.

20. The improved rotary blower as recited in claim 18, wherein said abradable coating has a thickness ranging from about 80 microns to about 130 microns.

21. The improved rotary blower as recited in claim 18, wherein said abradable coating has a median particle size of approximately 30 microns.