Rotary cutting tools, such as helical end mills and face mills, are well known in the industry. Conventional helical end mills include those shown on pages 182-216 in Kennametal's Milling Catalog No. 5040, copyright 1995.
One form of helical mill that has been in use for years is a helical mill where the cutting edge of each insert is axially spaced apart from the cutting edge of the next adjacent insert and where the inserts in each helix are staggered such that two or more rows are necessary to produce one complete or “all effective” cutting edge. Such a design is shown by the Kennametal 0 degree Lead-Helical End Mills, as shown on page 188 of the above referenced Milling Catalog. One of the disadvantages of such design is that the lead insert in at least one helix must either be of a different length or offset inward and thus incapable of face milling. This is a result of the need to stagger the inserts in each helix. Consequently, all of the inserts are generally not the same and thus not interchangeable, thus requiring the manufacture and inventory of multiple inserts.
As shown in
An insert (not shown) is affixed to each pocket 116 in each groove 110 using a screw (not shown) with a tapered head insertable through a correspondingly tapered hole (not shown) in each insert and then threaded into a threaded hole 118 in the respective pocket 116.
As shown in
Usually when a helical end mill is in operation, the machining force is exerted against one or more edges of the cutter. The resulting bending moment is resisted by the tool holder which rigidly grips the cutter shank. Ignoring the fact that the direction of the moment changes continually as the cutter revolves, the cutter can be considered to be stressed as a cantilever.
As shown in
While the matter of stress discussed above is related to avoiding fatigue that would result in tool breakage, no less important is the requirement to minimize tool deflection, in order to improve accuracy and surface finish and to reduce vibration and noise. The bending moment, along with the rotation of the cutter, produces a fully reversed stress condition (alternating tensile and compressive stresses), which is the most devastating condition for fatigue.
Accordingly, there is a need for an improved cutting tool that can overcome the limitations of the known cutting tool, and reduce or eliminate the overall stress of the cutting tool.
The invention has solved the problem of high stress associated with conventional cutting tools by providing a pocket feature located proximate the area of high stress on the radial support surface that greatly reduces the tensile stress, thereby improving tool safety and lifetime of the tool.
In one aspect, a cutting tool comprises a tool body including a plurality of pockets for receiving cutting inserts, each pocket comprising a bottom support surface, an axial support surface, a radial support surface and a corner relief between the bottom support surface and the radial support surface; a coolant passage proximate at least one of the plurality of pockets; and a non-circular recess surrounding the coolant passage, wherein the non-circular recess reduces a tensile stress in cutting tool during a machining operation.
In another aspect, a cutting tool comprises a tool body including a plurality of pockets for receiving cutting inserts, each pocket comprising a bottom support surface, an axial support surface, a radial support surface and a corner relief between the bottom support surface and the radial support surface; a non-circular recess proximate at least one of the plurality of pockets; and a coolant passage disposed within the non-circular recess, wherein the non-circular recess reduces a tensile stress in cutting tool during a machining operation.
While various embodiments of the invention are illustrated, the particular embodiments shown should not be construed to limit the claims. It is anticipated that various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the scope of this invention.
Referring to the drawings wherein like reference characters designate like elements there is shown a helical cutting tool 10, such as an end mill, face mill, and the like, according to an embodiment of the invention.
As shown in
As known in the art, an insert (not shown) is affixed to each pocket 26 in each groove 20 using a screw (not shown) with a tapered head insertable through a correspondingly tapered hole (not shown) in each insert and then threaded into a threaded hole 28 in the respective pocket 26. It is within the scope of the invention that any known insert securing method and device may be used including all those well recognized in the art without altering the invention.
The inserts may generally be of any known construction, size, shape, or configuration so long as the inserts securely and properly fit the pocket 34 in the intended manner. Examples of such inserts include those inserts described on pages 7-132 in the above referenced Kennametal Milling catalog. Specific examples include the ADKT or LFEW style inserts described therein.
As shown in
Up to this point, the helical end mill 10 of the invention is similar to the conventional helical end mill 100. One aspect of the invention is that the helical end mill 10 includes a stress-reducing feature, shown generally at 40, for reducing tensile stress in the helical end mill 10 during machining operations. Specifically, the stress-reducing feature is in the form of a non-circular recess 40 that surrounds the coolant passage 38, as shown in
The non-circular recess 40 can be oblong, oval or elliptical shaped having a maximum width 42 that is approximately twice the depth 44. In other words, the recess 40 has a width/depth ratio of about 2:1. In general, it has been found that increasing the depth of the recess 40 lowers the tensile stress on the edge of the coolant passage 38. However, it will be appreciated that the invention is not limited by the relative dimension of the recess, and that the invention can be practiced with any desirable width/depth ratio that provides the desired reduction in the overall stress of the tool.
In the illustrated embodiment, the major axis of the non-circular recess 40 is substantially aligned with the rotational axis 13 of the tool 10. However, it will be appreciated that the major axis of the non-circular recess 40 can be oriented at any desirable angle with respect to the rotational axis 13 that will provide the desirable reduction in the overall stress of the tool 10.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
The patents and other documents identified herein are hereby incorporated by reference herein. Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from a consideration of the specification or a practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples are illustrative only and are not intended to be limiting on the scope of the invention. The true scope and spirit of the invention is indicated by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3018675 | Klages et al. | Jan 1962 | A |
4606680 | Striegl | Aug 1986 | A |
6017171 | Karlsson | Jan 2000 | A |
6247878 | Musil et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6811359 | Craig | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7040844 | Daiguji | May 2006 | B1 |
7121769 | Satran et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7204662 | Long et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7255518 | Wallstrom et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7270504 | Tubinger et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7931425 | Morrison et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7963729 | Prichard et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8215878 | Rozzi et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
20060260439 | Tubinger et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20100239377 | Morrison et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100272529 | Rozzi et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100329804 | Okumura | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9855254 | Dec 1998 | WO |
2009112931 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2010092807 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2012047455 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2012070046 | May 2012 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130129429 A1 | May 2013 | US |