Rotary disk humidifiers have been commercially available for decades. They generally include a stack of flat circular disks that are mounted closely spaced and parallel to one another on a central shaft that rotates and immersed in a water reservoir so that as the disks rotate through the water bath, air flows across the disks above the water bath entraining water vapor in the air stream and thereby humidifying air exiting from the humidifier.
However, no attempt insofar as the present inventor is aware, has been made to optimize the wetted area of the disks exposed to air flowing through or across the disks.
For example, in the Burns, U.S. Pat. No. 5,795,505, a humidifier is disclosed with a spaced stack of annular disks rotated through a water bath with an axial flow inlet 44 that drives air axially through the center of the disks, which air is blocked by a plate 26 to cause the air to turn radially across the disks. No attempt or discussion is contained in the Burns patent relating to optimizing the wetted area of the stacked disks 10.
The Persons, U.S. Pat. No. 2,054,039, shows an axial to radial flow air conditioning system in
In the Tamm, U.S. Pat. No. 3,799,517, a method for moistening air is disclosed including a plurality of stacked disks rotatable in a reservoir with water illustrated in
The deficiency in Tamm is also shown in the McElreath, U.S. Pat. No. 3,823,922, relating to a humidifier, and this system makes no attempt to optimize the wetted area of the disks.
The Filss, U.S. Pat. No. 4,036,597, shows a plurality of circular plates but the system is designed not for humidification, but for purifying gasses, and therefore, is not relevant to the present invention.
It is a primary object of the present invention to ameliorate the problems noted above in the prior art and to optimize the wetted area Awe of humidifier disk stacks in a humidifier.
In accordance with the present invention, a rotary disk humidifier is provided that has multiple parallel spaced disks rotatably mounted in a water reservoir in a housing with controls for maintaining the water level in the housing to obtain an optimum wetted disk area above the water level exposed to air flow to achieve optimum humidification. At one theoretical extreme, the water level is at or above the center of rotation of disks decreasing the area of the disks exposed to free air flow through the housing. At the other theoretical extreme with the water level just at or slightly above the outer diameter of the disks, there is a grossly insufficient wetted area of the disk to approach the optimum area. Between those extremes there is a mathematical optimal range of the ratio inner wetted diameter of the disk Ri to the outside diameter of the disk Ro (or the average outer diameter of the disk—the disk may not be circular) is in the range of about 0.30.
In rotary disk humidifier designs, a number of disks typically rotate around a center shaft. Part of the disks are submerged in a water bath, with the remaining part of the disks exposed to an air stream which comes from outside the humidifier. Water evaporates from the disk's surfaces humidifying adjacent air. The humidified air ultimately enters a furnace plenum after passing through the humidifier (
The humidification capacity of each disk is proportional to the portion of the surface area wetted by the water bath, that is then exposed to the air stream and available for evaporation into the air stream. Any area of the disk that is not wetted by the water bath or is submerged, does not contribute to the humidification capacity (
The distance from the center of rotation to the water surface can be defined as Ri (the inner diameter of the wetted area on each disk). The outer wetted diameter Ro of each disk is simply the average outer diameter of each disk. It can be shown that for a given disk outer diameter (Ro), the wetted surface area (bounded by Ro and Ri) can be optimized by keeping the water level at a certain height (Ri) with respect to the disk's center of rotation. Ri is also the radius of the wetted segment of the disk (
If the water level is maintained above the bottom edge of the disk, but below the centerline, the wetted area exposed to the air stream can be shown to be equal to the entire area of the disk, minus the area of the disk that is not wetted, minus the wetted area submerged below the waterline (
where Ro=the outer radius of the disk, and Ri=the distance from the disk center to the water surface of the water.
Normalizing or reducing by dividing through by Ro2 and letting Ri/Ro=r, A/Ro2=Pi(½=r2)+r cos(sin−1 r)+sin−1 r, showing that for any given disk diameter, the wetted area Awe exposed to the air stream is a function of the ratio of the inner to outer diameter. This function does not monotonically increase or decrease between Ri/Ro=0 (water line maintained at the center of the disk) and Ri/Ro=1/1=1 (water line maintained at the bottom of the disk), and therefore has a maximum wetted area exposed to the air stream. The optimum ratio of the inner to outer diameter is about 0.3, as seen in
This can be shown by setting the above equal to zero, and solving it numerically (
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will be more apparent from the following detailed description.
Viewing
The disk stack 19 is driven by a motor not illustrated in the drawings and is seen to include a plurality of circular disks 22 closely spaced from one another as illustrated in
In
The humidification capacity of each disk is proportional to the portion of the surface area wetted by the water bath 47, that is then exposed to the air stream and subsequently available for evaporation into the air stream. Any area of the disk that is not wetted by the water bath or is submerged does not contribute to the humidification capacity.
The purpose of the present invention is to maximize the area Awe, the wetted area above the water line, to provide optimal humidification.
The distance from the center of rotation to the water surface can be defined as Ri. It can be shown that for a given disk size (Ro), the wetted surface area (bounded by Ro and Ri), can be optimized by keeping the water level at a certain height with respect to the disk's center of rotation. Ri is also the inner radius, as explained above, of the wetted segment of the disk in
If the water level is maintained above the bottom edge of the disk, but below the centerline (searching for the optimum area), the wetted area exposed to the air stream can be shown to be equal to the entire area of the disk, minus the area of the disk that is not wetted, minus the wetted area submerged below the waterline (
where Ro=the radius of the disk, and Ri=the distance from the disk center to the water surface of the water.
By dividing through by Ro2 and letting Ri/Ro=r, this equation becomes A/Ro2=Pi(½=r2)+r cos(sin−1 r)+sin−1 r.
This shows that for any given disk diameter, the wetted area exposed to the air stream Awe is a function of the ratio of the inner to the outer diameter. This function does not monotonically increase or decrease between Ri/Ro=0 (water line maintained at the center of the disk) and Ri/Ro=1/1=1 (water line maintained at the bottom of the disk), and therefore has a maximum wetted area exposed to the air stream. The optimum ratio of the inner to outer diameter is about 0.3, as seen in
This can be shown by setting the above equal to zero, and solving it numerically in
Of course, it is not necessary to operate at an Ri/Ro value of exactly 0.30 to achieve the benefits of the present invention, and as used herein the term “substantially 0.30” in reference to the ratio r is in the range of 0.22 to 0.38, and the term “approximately 0.30” is a broader range that could, in certain cases, extend to 0.06 to 0.64, even though this does not represent an optimum range.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2060636 | Persons | Nov 1936 | A |
2054039 | Persons | Sep 1938 | A |
2253418 | Crandall et al. | Aug 1941 | A |
2703228 | Fleisher | Mar 1955 | A |
3309021 | Powers | Mar 1967 | A |
3385574 | Lohman | May 1968 | A |
3481588 | Lobb | Dec 1969 | A |
3705479 | McPherson | Dec 1972 | A |
3724824 | Mitich | Apr 1973 | A |
3733062 | Bracich | May 1973 | A |
3774588 | Yeagle | Nov 1973 | A |
3799517 | Tamm | Mar 1974 | A |
3823922 | McElreath | Jul 1974 | A |
4036597 | Filss | Jul 1977 | A |
4056582 | Chow | Nov 1977 | A |
4185687 | Stockman | Jan 1980 | A |
4399031 | Imano et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
5171486 | Penno | Dec 1992 | A |
5795505 | Burns | Aug 1998 | A |