Claims
- 1. A method of designing a fixed cutter drill bit comprising determining a layout of cutter locations in which cutters are to be positioned upon a bit body, determining a likely wear rate for at least the cutters provided at some of the cutter locations, selecting a desired wear profile for the bit, and using the determined likely wear rates to determine the abrasion resistance of the cutter to be mounted at each cutter location to achieve the desired wear profile, wherein all the cutters have substantially the same impact toughness and wherein the desired wear profile is of generally flat form.
- 2. A method of claim 1, wherein the desired wear profile includes a region of relatively low rate bounded by regions of higher wear rates.
- 3. A method according to claim 1, wherein a first type of cutters to be mounted at a first one of said cutter locations has a relatively low abrasion resistance and a second type of cutter to be mounted at a second one of said cutter locations has a relatively high abrasion resistance.
- 4. A method according to claim 3, wherein the cutter of the second type comprises a table of polycrystalline diamond bonded to a substrate, the table of polycrystalline diamond defining a matrix of interstices containing a catalyzing material, the interstices of the matrix located within a volume close to a working surface of the cutter being substantially free of catalyzing material.
- 5. A method according to claim 4, wherein the volume close to the working surface extends to a depth of at least about 0.25 mm from the working surface.
- 6. A method according to claim 5, wherein the volume close to the working surface extends to a depth of at least about 0.5 mm from working surface.
- 7. A method of designing a fixed cutter drill bit comprising determining a layout of cutter locations in which cutters are to be positioned upon a bit body, determining a likely wear rate for at least the cutters provided at some of the cutter locations, selecting a desired wear profile for the bit, and using the determined likely wear rates to determine the abrasion resistance of the cutter to be mounted at each cutter location to achieve the desired wear profile, wherein all the cutters have substantially the same impact toughness and wherein the desired wear profile includes a region of relatively low wear rate bounded by regions of higher wear rates.
- 8. A method according to claim 7, wherein a first type of cutter to be mounted at a first one of said cutter locations has a relatively low abrasion resistance and a second type of cutter to be mounted at a second one of said locations has a relatively high abrasion resistance.
- 9. A method according to claim 8, wherein the cutter of the second type comprises a table of polycrystalline diamond bonded to a substrate, the table of polycrystalline diamond defining a matrix of interstices containing a catalyzing material, the interstices of the matrix located within a volume close to a working surface of the cutter being substantially free of catalyzing material.
- 10. A method of claim 9, wherein the volume close to the working surface extends to a depth of at least about 0.25 mm from the working surface.
- 11. A method according to claim 10, wherein the volume close to the working surface extends to a depth of at least about 0.5 mm from the working surface.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/234,075 filed Sep. 20, 2000, and from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/281,054 filed Apr. 2, 2001.
US Referenced Citations (4)
Number |
Name |
Date |
Kind |
5607024 |
Keith et al. |
Mar 1997 |
A |
5833021 |
Mensa-Wilmot |
Nov 1998 |
A |
5960896 |
Barr et al. |
Oct 1999 |
A |
6021859 |
Tibbits et al. |
Feb 2000 |
A |
Foreign Referenced Citations (12)
Number |
Date |
Country |
0 462 955 |
Jun 1991 |
EP |
0 554 568 |
Aug 1993 |
EP |
0 546 725 |
Sep 1996 |
EP |
2 161 849 |
Jan 1986 |
GB |
2 261 894 |
Jun 1993 |
GB |
2 285 823 |
Jul 1995 |
GB |
2 292 163 |
Feb 1996 |
GB |
2 294 712 |
May 1996 |
GB |
2 298 668 |
Sep 1996 |
GB |
2 300 208 |
Oct 1996 |
GB |
2 317 195 |
Mar 1998 |
GB |
WO 0028106 |
May 2000 |
WO |
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry |
European Search Report, EP 01 30 7739, “Documents Considered to be Relevant,” Feb. 18, 2002. |
Provisional Applications (2)
|
Number |
Date |
Country |
|
60/234075 |
Sep 2000 |
US |
|
60/281054 |
Apr 2001 |
US |