This invention relates generally to devices and methods for cutting food products, such as vegetable products, and particularly such as raw potatoes and the like, into spiral or helical shaped pieces, whose cut surfaces may be patterned by the design of knife blades, such as to create textured “crinkle-cut” spiral or helical pieces.
Production cutting systems and related knife fixtures are useful for cutting vegetable products such as raw potatoes into spiral or helical shaped pieces, preparatory to further production processing steps such as blanching and parfrying. In this regard, one typical production system comprises a hydraulic cutting system wherein a so-called water knife fixture is mounted along the length of an elongated tubular conduit. A pumping device is provided to entrain the vegetable product such as raw potatoes within a propelling water flume for cutting engagement with knife blades of the water knife fixture. The vegetable product is pumped one at a time in single file succession into and through the water conduit with a velocity and sufficient kinetic energy to carry the vegetable product through a relatively complex knife fixture which includes at least one rotary cutting blade for severing the product into a plurality of smaller pieces of generally spiral or helical shape. The cut pieces are then carried further through a discharge conduit for appropriate subsequent processing, including cooking or blanching, parfrying, freezing and packaging steps, for subsequent finish processing and serving to customers as loops, twirls, curly fries, etc.
Examples of such hydraulic cutting systems and related rotary knife fixtures are found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,168,784; 5,179,881; 5,277,546; 5,343,791; 5,394,780; 5,394,793; 5,473,967; 5,992,287; and Re. 38,149, all of which are incorporated by reference herein. Persons skilled in the art will recognize and appreciate that mechanical production feed systems may be employed in lieu of hydraulic feed systems, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,097,735; 5,167,177; 5,167,178; and 5,293,803, which are also incorporated by reference herein.
The present invention is directed to an improved rotary knife fixture and related cutting blades for cutting raw vegetable products, such as potatoes, into spiral shaped pieces that may or may not have textured cut surfaces, such as crinkles, waves, or other designs.
In accordance with the invention, a rotary knife fixture is provided for cutting vegetable products such as raw potatoes into spiral shapes. The knife fixture comprises a circular or ring-shaped blade holder adapted to be rotatably driven at a selected rotational speed within a hydraulic product flow path. The blade holder carries at least one cutting blade rotated therewith, wherein the blade is twisted from a generally longitudinally aligned center axis outwardly in opposite radial directions with a sharpened leading edge set at a desired pitch angle. By controlling the pitch of the blade in relation to the rotational speed of the blade and the velocity at which the potato travels along the hydraulic flow path, the resultant spiral cut shape is selected. By using multiple cutting blades at known axially spaced positions and selecting the angular position of each cutting blade in succession, the number of spiral shapes cut from each potato is also selected.
In one preferred form, the ring-shaped blade holder of the rotary knife fixture is rotatably driven within a vegetable product flow path, such as along a hydraulic flow conduit having raw vegetables such as potatoes carried in single file there through. The blade holder supports at least one cutting blade which is twisted from a generally longitudinally aligned center axis outwardly in opposite radial directions, and defining a pair of sharpened cutting edges presented in opposite circumferential directions. Each half of the cutting blade is set at a selected pitch angle which varies according to specific radial position, per the formula:
Pitch Angle=ArcTan(2×Pi×Radius/Pitch Length). (1)
For a blade diameter equal to 4 inches (radius=2 inches), and a pitch length equal to 3 inches, each cutting blade is anchored at its outer edge on the associated ring-shaped blade holder at an angle of about 76.6°. However, note that the specific pitch angle will vary according to radial position along the blade and the pitch length.
In use, the single cutting blade is rotatably driven, in a preferred form, at a rotational speed of about 6,000 revolutions per minute (rpm), to cut each potato traveling along the hydraulic flow conduit at a velocity of about 25 feet per second (fps) into a pair of generally spiral shaped pieces. With a pitch length of about 3 inches potato travel per cutting blade revolution, this results in substantially optimum cutting of each potato. In one embodiment, a cutting blade is rotatably driven at a rotational speed anywhere from about 4,000 rpm to 8,000 rpm. In one embodiment, a cutting blade is rotatably driven at a rotational speed anywhere from about 4,000 rpm, about 5,000 rpm, about 6,000 rpm, about 7,000 rpm, or about 8,000 rpm, or at revolutions greater than 8,000 rpm.
When more than one cutting blade is used, each of the cutting blades may be physically supported in a stack of ring-shaped blade holders having a known axial dimension such as about 0.5 inch per blade holder, with the multiple blade holders being fixed for rotation together. With this configuration, the angle θ (theta) separating each of the supported cutting blades in succession is given by the formula:
θ=(((T/P)×360°)+(360°/N)), (2)
where T=axial dimension of each blade holder, P=pitch length, and N=number of cut pieces.
Following this formula, when two cutting blades (N) are used, each carried by a 0.5 inch thick ring-shaped blade holder (T), with a pitch length (P) of 3 inches, a total of four spiral pieces are cut from each product, and the second cutting blade is rotationally set to lag the first cutting blade by 150°. Similarly, where three cutting blades are used, each product is cut into a total of six spiral pieces, and the second blade is oriented to lag the first blade by 120°, and the third blade is oriented to lag the second by an additional 120°, or a total lag from the first blade of about 240°. And, where four cutting blades are used, each product is cut into a total of eight spiral pieces, and the four blades are oriented respectively to lag the immediately preceding blade by about 105°.
Accordingly, the present invention encompasses a configuration of multiple blades to produce 2, 4, 6, 8, or more spiral pieces per product. In addition to even numbers of spiral pieces cut per product, the present invention encompasses a configuration of blades that produce 3, 5, 7, 9 or more spiral pieces per product. An example of such a spiral piece is shown in D640,036, which is incorporated herein by reference.
A further aspect of the present invention is a cutting blade designed to have a textured or “crinkled” surface edge so that when it cuts the product, the exposed cut surface is similarly textured or crinkled. Accordingly, in one embodiment crinkle-cut spiral pieces of product can be produced using the inventive blades and cutting system.
In any embodiment, or permutation, of cutting blades and number of cutting blades in the inventive cutting system, any number of spiral pieces can be obtained per product. That is 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10, or more than 10 spiral pieces may be cut from each product. In another embodiment any number or all of the cutting blades may be textured or crinkled to produce textured or crinkled cut surfaces on a spiral piece. Thus, in one embodiment every spiral piece cut from one product may contain at least one crinkle-textured cut surface if every cutting blade in the cutting system has a crinkled surface edge. However in another embodiment not every cutting blade in the cutting system has a wavy, textured, or crinkled edge. Thus, in that instance, a single product may be cut to yield smooth surface spiral pieces as well as crinkle-cut spiral pieces.
By “product” is meant any vegetable or fruit or wood. A vegetable that may be cut into 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more than 10 spiral pieces that may have smooth or textured/crinkled surfaces, includes, but is not limited to, any tuberous vegetable, beets, turnips, radish, leeks, or any root vegetable. In one embodiment, a tuber is a potato, sweet potato, carrot, cassava, swede, or yam. A fruit that may be cut into 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more than 10 spiral pieces that may have smooth or textured/crinkled surfaces, includes, but is not limited to, apples, squash, bell peppers, pumpkin, zucchini, cucumber, mangos, and plantains. A vegetable or fruit when it is processed and cut according to the methods disclosed herein does not necessarily have to be whole. That is, chunks or cut pieces of a vegetable may be pumped into the cutting system and those chunks or pieces subsequently cut with cutting blades to produce spiral pieces or spiral fragments.
The present invention in particular encompasses a new french fry that is spiral-cut and which may have smooth or crinkled surfaces. See, for instance, the spiral potato pieces shown in
Pieces of wood may also be cut into 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more than 10 spiral pieces that may have smooth or textured/crinkled surfaces. Softwoods could be cut according to the present invention, for instance. Examples of softwood include but are not limited to pine, redwood, fir, cedar, and larch. Other materials may be cut according to the present invention too, such as polystyrene, foam, solid paper pulp materials, and plastics.
Other features and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings which illustrate, by way of example, the principles of the invention.
The accompanying drawings illustrate the invention. In such drawings:
This invention relates generally to devices and methods for cutting food products, such as vegetable products, and particularly such as raw potatoes and the like, into spiral or helical shaped pieces, whose cut surfaces may be patterned by the design of knife blades, such as to create “crinkle-cut” spiral or helical pieces.
More particularly, this invention relates to a rotatably driven knife fixture having a selected number of knife blades adapted to cut a raw potato or the like into generally spiral shaped pieces.
As shown in the exemplary drawings, a hydraulic cutting system comprises a conventional so-called water knife fixture referred to generally in
As viewed in
Persons skilled in the art will recognize and appreciate that alternative form cutting systems may be used, to include, by way of example, mechanical cutting systems wherein the vegetable products such as potatoes are mechanically delivered via a chute or hopper or the like to the knife fixture 10. In either case, the knife fixture 10 is mounted along a production path and is rotatably driven for engaging and cutting the incoming products into the desired spiral shaped pieces.
As shown in
The driven ring 30 of the rotary bearing unit 20 includes a circumferential array of detents 41 for registry with teeth 42 of a cog-type drive belt 43 (
In one preferred configuration as viewed in
More specifically, the specific pitch angle of the cutting blade 16 at each specific point along its radial length is given by the formula:
Pitch Angle=ArcTan(2×Pi×Radius/Pitch Length). (1)
For a total blade radius of 2 inches, and a pitch length of about 3 inches, the clamp screws 31 secure the outermost radial ends of each cutting blade 16 or 17 at a pitch angle of about 76.6° to the axial blade centerline. It will be understood, however, that the specific pitch angle is directly proportional to the radial point along the blade, whereby the pitch angle increases from the radial center. It is this pitch angle that determines the spiral shape of the cut product.
If more spiral shaped pieces 14 are desired from each potato 12, more cutting blades are used recognizing that each of the cutting blades cuts the incoming product in two, and thereby produces twice the number of spiral shaped pieces in comparison with the number of cutting blades used. Importantly, the cutting blades are arranged in succession at controlled angles to obtain similar or virtually identical cut spiral shaped pieces.
More particularly, in one preferred form as viewed in
The two cutting blades 16 and 17 are generally identical to each to each other, to include a twisted shape generally at a longitudinal center axis thereof and extending radially outwardly in opposite directions for seated engagement as by means of clamp screws 31 or the like at the selected pitch angle. Using formula (1) above for the specific pitch angle of each blade 16 or 17 along its radial length, and wherein the total blade radius is 2 inches and the pitch length is 3 inches, the clamp screws 31 secure the outermost radial ends of each cutting blade 16 or 17 at a pitch angle of about 76.6°. In this respect,
In addition, when the two cutting blades 16 and 17 are rotated at about 6,000 revolutions per minute (rpm), to advance each product to be cut along the hydraulic flow path at a velocity of about 25 feet per second (fps), the two cutting blades 16 and 17 both cut the incoming product into two pieces, for a total of four spiral shaped pieces 14 of similar or identical shape. With a pitch length of about 3 inches potato travel for each cutting blade revolution, and with each of the blade holders 22, 22′ having an axial dimension of about 0.5 inch, the angle θ (theta) separating each of the supported cutting blades is given by the formula:
θ=(((T/P)×360°)+(360°/N)), (2)
where T=axial dimension of each blade holder, P=pitch length, and N=number of cut pieces.
In the case of the two cutting blades 16, 17 adapted to cut each incoming product into four generally identical spiral shaped pieces, the angle θ=150°.
Persons skilled in the art will understand and appreciate, of course, that virtually any number of cutting blades can be used, with the formula (2) determining the angular spacings of the multiple cutting blades in succession. For example, when five cutting blades are used, a total of ten spiral shaped pieces are formed; following formula (2), the successive cutting blade angular spacings would be about 96°. Similarly, when six cutting blades are used, a total of twelve spiral shaped pieces are formed; following formula (2), the successive cutting blade angular spacings would be about 90°. Persons skilled in the art will also appreciate that when three or more cutting blades are used, the formula (2) determines that angular spacings of the blades as a group, but that each of the blades need only be set at one of the angular positions; that is, the blades do not need to be set at a regular lag interval, so long as one of the blades in the group is set at each one of the angular positions.
Alternately, it will be understood that other forms of the blade holders and the related interconnection means can be employed, such as the formation of steps including interengaging tabs and slots in the respective blade holders to insure the desired angular position of the cutting blades and concurrent rotation thereof.
In an alternative preferred form, the present invention encompasses a new french fry that is spiral-cut and which may have corrugated or crinkled surfaces. See, for instance, the spiral potato pieces 14′ shown in
Accordingly, one embodiment of the present invention is a collection of spiral-cut potato pieces that are raw, a collection of spiral-cut potato pieces that are fried, or a collection of spiral-cut potato pieces that are oven-baked, or a collection of spiral-cut potato pieces that are roasted, wherein the pieces have smooth surfaces or have a crinkle-cut surface. By “smooth” surface is meant a spiral cut product that has been cut with a cutting blade 16, 17, 18 or 19 that has a flat, untextured, surface and edge, as viewed in
It will be understood, of course, that the modified knife fixture 11′ shown in
A variety of modifications and improvements in and to the rotary knife fixture 10 of the present invention will be apparent to those persons skilled in the art. As one example, persons skilled in the art will understand that each of the twisted cutting blades as shown and described herein can be replaced by a pair of individual blades aligned diametrically with each other and having a pitch angle as defined by formula (1), but otherwise unconnected at the axial centerline of the flow path. For instance, in
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/647,319, filed on Oct. 8, 2012 and entitled “Rotary Knife Fixture for Cutting Spiral, Textured Potato Pieces,” now U.S. Pat. No. 9,089,987, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/661,278, filed on Jun. 18, 2012 and entitled “Rotary Knife Fixture for Cutting Spiral, Textured Potato Pieces,” and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/546,035 filed on Oct. 11, 2011 and entitled “Rotary Knife Fixture for Cutting Spiral Potato Pieces,” the contents of all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
371579 | Harding | Oct 1887 | A |
978482 | Petri | Dec 1910 | A |
1494102 | Cramer | May 1924 | A |
2033700 | Geiger | Mar 1936 | A |
2460111 | Worthington | Jan 1949 | A |
2514609 | Roy | Jul 1950 | A |
2571300 | Simpson | Oct 1951 | A |
3299924 | Hanschitz | Jan 1967 | A |
4372184 | Fisher et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4387111 | Mullender | Jun 1983 | A |
4393737 | Shibata | Jul 1983 | A |
4911045 | Mendenhall | Mar 1990 | A |
5046388 | Mendenhall | Sep 1991 | A |
5095794 | Mendenhall | Mar 1992 | A |
5097735 | Mendenhall | Mar 1992 | A |
5167177 | Cimperman et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5167178 | Cimperman | Dec 1992 | A |
5168784 | Foster | Dec 1992 | A |
5174181 | Julian et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5179881 | Frey | Jan 1993 | A |
5224409 | Cimperman | Jul 1993 | A |
5277546 | Frey et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5293803 | Foster | Mar 1994 | A |
5343623 | Cole et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5343791 | Julian | Sep 1994 | A |
5385074 | Burch, Jr. | Jan 1995 | A |
5394780 | Foster et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5394793 | Julian | Mar 1995 | A |
5421226 | Mendenhall | Jun 1995 | A |
5473967 | Frey | Dec 1995 | A |
5655428 | Cockburn | Aug 1997 | A |
5806397 | Mendenhall | Sep 1998 | A |
5904083 | Jensen | May 1999 | A |
5992287 | Dube | Nov 1999 | A |
6047625 | Mendenhall | Apr 2000 | A |
6216350 | Kirk | Apr 2001 | B1 |
RE38149 | Dube | Jun 2003 | E |
6725765 | Mendenhall | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6799495 | Jensen | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6923104 | Jensen | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6955110 | Spletzer | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7137325 | Bajema et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7513450 | Young | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7721637 | Bucks | May 2010 | B2 |
20010042428 | Jensen | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20030072835 | Weinstein et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040031255 | Kenny | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050102843 | Jiang | May 2005 | A1 |
20060283339 | Jensen | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20130087032 | Walker et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
US Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/647,319 dated Sep. 5, 2014. |
International Searching Authority; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 15, 2016, PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/045172. |
European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 17159568.9 dated May 22, 2017. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/868,987 dated Jul. 24, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150246456 A1 | Sep 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61661278 | Jun 2012 | US | |
61546035 | Oct 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13647319 | Oct 2012 | US |
Child | 14712857 | US |