The present invention relates to latches, and more particularly, to an improved rotary latch system.
Rotary latch systems have been used in various applications for many years. Rotary latches are particularly useful in applications where a user slams shut a door or lid. For example, rotary latches are frequently used in automobiles to secure lift gates, doors, hoods, and lids. Rotary latches are also used to secure cabinet doors to cabinets. In automotive applications, rotary latch systems must withstand relatively high impact forces. Moreover, lift gates, doors, hoods, and lids are opened and closed (often forcefully) countless times during the life of an automobile. As a result, rotary latch systems must be long-lasting and hard-wearing.
Typical rotary latches generally include a housing that contains a rotary pawl and a rotary jaw. The rotary jaw and housing include U-shaped notches for receiving a strike surface. In general, the pawl controls the jaw. Over the years, this type of latch has been improved numerous times and yet retains the same basic mechanism and function of original rotary latches.
One previously known, slam-capable rotary latch mechanism is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,844,948 (“'948 patent”) entitled ROTARY LATCH AND LOCK and U.S. Pat. No. 5,564,295 (“'295 patent”) entitled HANDLE OPERABLE ROTARY LATCH AND LOCK. In general, these patents describe a rotary latch having a pair of housing side plates that sandwich the rotary jaw and rotary pawl. The '948 patent discloses housing side plates including formations extending toward a central plane (that is occupied by the rotary jaw and the rotary pawl) to guide and maintain proper positioning of one or both of the rotary jaw and the rotary pawl within the common central plane. Spacers are positioned transversely relative to the rotary jaw and rotary pawl. As described in the '948 patent, the spacers are immovably attached to the housing side plates through hexagonal holes in the housing side plates. Additionally, one of the housing side plates is provided with an integrally formed reinforcement flange adjacent the strike-receiving portion of the housing side plate.
Previously known slam-capable rotary latches, however, have a number of drawbacks. Many previously known rotary latches are subjected to relatively high shear forces generated as the strike slams into the latch and housing. Over time, the housing, rotary jaw and rotary paw fatigue and may jam or come apart, thus rendering the latch inoperable. While reinforcement flanges have been previously used to reinforce housing side plates, such flanges are not interconnected. As a result, such flanges provide limited support. In addition, manufacturing previously known slam-capable rotary latches can be unnecessarily difficult and time-consuming.
The various preferred embodiments provide significant improvements and advantages over other rotary latches. According to a first aspect of the present invention, a rotary latch includes a housing having a first lateral wall and a first transverse wall extending from the lateral wall. The first transverse wall has a first projection. The housing further includes a second lateral wall, and a second transverse wall extending from the second lateral wall. The second transverse wall forms a recess adapted to receive the first projection. In various embodiments, the projection and recess can be configured as a tab and slot fitting or a dovetail fitting, for example and without limitation. In one embodiment the projection and recess are welded or secured together by an adhesive. The first lateral wall and the second lateral wall further define a channel configured to receive a strike.
The foregoing paragraph has been provided by way of general introduction, and is not intended to limit the scope of the following claims. The presently preferred embodiments, together with further advantages will be best understood by reference to the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The invention is described with reference to the drawings in which like elements are referred to by like numerals. The relationship and functioning of the various elements of this invention are better understood by the following detailed description. However, the embodiments of this invention as described below are by way of example only, and the invention is not limited to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings. It should also be understood that the drawings are not to scale and in certain instances details have been omitted, which are not necessary for an understanding of the present invention, such as conventional details of fabrication and assembly.
Referring to the drawings,
As best shown in
The disclosed tab and slot configuration reinforces the housing, which is subjected to a variety of impact forces created as the strike slams into the latch. Transverse walls 24 include tabs 28 and transverse walls 27 of cover 25 are provided with slots 32. As illustrated in
As illustrated in
Referring to
Referring to
In operation, rotary latch 10 has two main positions-unlatched and latched.
The embodiments described above and shown herein are illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is indicated by the claims rather than by the foregoing description and attached drawings. The invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit of the invention. For example, the housing can be formed from more than two parts, or alternatively as a single, integral structure. Likewise, numerous linkages can be provided between the lock and the latch. In addition, the shape and construction of the associated jaw and pawl structures could be varied while still achieving the required functionality. Likewise, the shape of the strike channel could be varied while still achieving the required functionality. Accordingly, these and other changes which come within the scope of the claims are intended to be embraced herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2454145 | Erkkila | Nov 1948 | A |
4320642 | Pastva, Jr. | Mar 1982 | A |
4896906 | Weinerman et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
5069491 | Weinerman et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5439260 | Weinerman et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5445422 | Weinerman et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5564295 | Weinerman et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5577782 | Johnson et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5611224 | Weinerman et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5884948 | Weinerman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6149210 | Hunt et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6158787 | Kutschat | Dec 2000 | A |
6497436 | DeBlock et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6629710 | Shafry et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6974163 | Peng et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
20050057051 | Bartos | Mar 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060103144 A1 | May 2006 | US |