The current invention is directed to an improved rotary pulser for transmitting information from a down hole location in a well to the surface, such as that used in a mud pulse telemetry system employed in a drill string for drilling an oil well.
In underground drilling, such as gas, oil or geothermal drilling, a bore is drilled through a formation deep in the earth. Such bores are formed by connecting a drill bit to sections of long pipe, referred to as a “drill pipe,” so as to form an assembly commonly referred to as a “drill string” that extends from the surface to the bottom of the bore. The drill bit is rotated so that it advances into the earth, thereby forming the bore. In rotary drilling, the drill bit is rotated by rotating the drill string at the surface. In directional drilling, the drill bit is rotated by a down hole mud motor coupled to the drill bit; the remainder of the drill string is not rotated during drilling. In a steerable drill string, the mud motor is bent at a slight angle to the centerline of the drill bit so as to create a side force that directs the path of the drill bit away from a straight line. In any event, in order to lubricate the drill bit and flush cuttings from its path, piston operated pumps on the surface pump a high pressure fluid, referred to as “drilling mud,” through an internal passage in the drill string and out through the drill bit. The drilling mud then flows to the surface through the annular passage formed between the drill string and the surface of the bore.
Depending on the drilling operation, the pressure of the drilling mud flowing through the drill string will typically be between 1,000 and 25,000 psi. In addition, there is a large pressure drop at the drill bit so that the pressure of the drilling mud flowing outside the drill string is considerably less than that flowing inside the drill string. Thus, the components within the drill string are subject to large pressure forces. In addition, the components of the drill string are also subjected to wear and abrasion from drilling mud, as well as the vibration of the drill string.
The distal end of a drill string, which includes the drill bit, is referred to as the “bottom hole assembly.” In “measurement while drilling” (MWD) applications, sensing modules in the bottom hole assembly provide information concerning the direction of the drilling. This information can be used, for example, to control the direction in which the drill bit advances in a steerable drill string. Such sensors may include a magnetometer to sense azimuth and accelerometers to sense inclination and tool face.
Historically, information concerning the conditions in the well, such as information about the formation being drill through, was obtained by stopping drilling, removing the drill string, and lowering sensors into the bore using a wire line cable, which were then retrieved after the measurements had been taken. This approach was known as wire line logging. More recently, sensing modules have been incorporated into the bottom hole assembly to provide the drill operator with essentially real time information concerning one or more aspects of the drilling operation as the drilling progresses. In “logging while drilling” (LWD) applications, the drilling aspects about which information is supplied comprise characteristics of the formation being drilled through. For example, resistivity sensors may be used to transmit, and then receive, high frequency wavelength signals (e.g., electromagnetic waves) that travel through the formation surrounding the sensor. By comparing the transmitted and received signals, information can be determined concerning the nature of the formation through which the signal traveled, such as whether it contains water or hydrocarbons. Other sensors are used in conjunction with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Still other sensors include gamma scintillators, which are used to determine the natural radioactivity of the formation, and nuclear detectors, which are used to determine the porosity and density of the formation.
In traditional LWD and MWD systems, electrical power was supplied by a turbine driven by the mud flow. More recently, battery modules have been developed that are incorporated into the bottom hole assembly to provide electrical power.
In both LWD and MWD systems, the information collected by the sensors must be transmitted to the surface, where it can be analyzed. Such data transmission is typically accomplished using a technique referred to as “mud pulse telemetry.” In a mud pulse telemetry system, signals from the sensor modules are typically received and processed in a microprocessor-based data encoder of the bottom hole assembly, which digitally encodes the sensor data. A controller in the control module then actuates a pulser, also incorporated into the bottom hole assembly, that generates pressure pulses within the flow of drilling mud that contain the encoded information. The pressure pulses are defined by a variety of characteristics, including amplitude (the difference between the maximum and minimum values of the pressure), duration (the time interval during which the pressure is increased), shape, and frequency (the number of pulses per unit time). Various encoding systems have been developed using one or more pressure pulse characteristics to represent binary data (i.e., bit 1 or 0)—for example, a pressure pulse of 0.5 second duration represents binary 1, while a pressure pulse of 1.0 second duration represents binary 0. The pressure pulses travel up the column of drilling mud flowing down to the drill bit, where they are sensed by a strain gage based pressure transducer. The data from the pressure transducers are then decoded and analyzed by the drill rig operating personnel.
Various techniques have been attempted for generating the pressure pulses in the drilling mud. One technique involves incorporating a pulser into the drill string in which the drilling mud flows through passages formed by a stator. A rotor, which is typically disposed upstream of the stator, is either rotated continuously, referred to as a mud siren, or is incremented, either by oscillating the rotor or rotating it incrementally in one direction, so that the rotor blades alternately increase and decrease the amount by which they obstruct the stator passages, thereby generating pulses in the drilling fluid. An oscillating type pulser valve is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,714,138 (Turner et al.), hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. A prior art rotor used in a commercial embodiment of U.S. Pat. No. 6,714,138 (Turner et al.) is shown in
Unfortunately, in such prior pulsers, the flow of drilling mud creates pressure forces that tend to drive the rotor into a position in which the rotor blades provide the maximum obstruction to the flow of drilling mud. Consequently, if the motor driving the pulser fails, the flow induced torque will cause the rotor to remain stationary in the position of maximum obstruction, thereby interfering with flow of drilling mud, increasing the pressure of the drilling mud, and accelerating wear of the pulser components due to the high flow velocity through the obstructed passages.
Moreover, even if the motor does not fail, during periods when the pulser is not operating, the flow induced torque will gradually overcome the rotor's resistance to rotation and obstruct the mud flow. Since this unnecessary obstruction to the flow of drilling mud is undesirable, the rotor position must be monitored and the pulser motor periodically employed to rotate the rotor into the position of minimum obstruction. This results in an unnecessary drain on the battery that powers the motor.
According to one approach, described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,785,300 (Chin et al), the generation of a flow induced torque tending to rotate the rotor into the obstruction orientation may be prevented in certain pulsers by shaping rotor blades, located downstream of the stator, so that their sides are outwardly tapered, and thus become wider in the circumferential direction, as they extend in the downstream direction. However, this approach is not believed to be entirely satisfactory in many situations.
Consequently, it would be desirable to provide a mud pulse telemetry system in which the rotor blades were prevented from unintentionally rotating into the obstructed position when the pulser was not being utilized to transmit information, without the need to operate the pulser motor.
In addition, the portions of a pulser subject to the high velocity flow of drilling mud are subject to wear. Consequently, it would also be desirable to develop a pulser with increased resistance to wear in such high flow areas.
It is an object of the current invention to provide an improved apparatus for transmitting information from a portion of a drill string operating at a down hole location in a well bore to a location proximate the surface of the earth, the drill string having a passage through which a drilling fluid flows, comprising a rotary pulser having (i) a housing adapted to be mounted in the drill string, (ii) a stator supported in the housing and having at least one approximately axially extending passage formed therein through which at least a portion of the drilling fluid flows, (iii) a rotor supported in the housing adjacent the stator and downstream therefrom, the rotor having at least one blade extending radially outward so as to define a radial height thereof, the blade imparting a varying degree of obstruction to the flow of drilling fluid flowing through the stator passage depending on the circumferential orientation of the rotor, the rotor being rotatable into at least first and second circumferential orientations, the first rotor circumferential orientation providing a greater obstruction to the flow of drilling fluid than that of the second rotor circumferential orientation, whereby rotation of the rotor generates a series of pulses encoded with the information to be transmitted, (iv) a motor coupled to the rotor for imparting rotation to the rotor, whereby operation of the motor generates the series of encoded pulses, and (v) means for imparting a torque to reduce the obstruction imparted by the blade to the flow of drilling fluid when the motor is not operating to transmit the information by urging the rotor to rotate away from the first circumferential orientation and toward the second circumferential orientation. In one embodiment of the invention, a replaceable wear sleeve is disposed in the housing enclosing the rotor.
a) and (b) are transverse cross-sections of the stator shown in
a) to (d) are a series of transverse cross-sections through one of the blades of the rotor shown in
a), (b), and (c) are cross-sections of the pulser taken along line XVIII-XVIII shown in
A drilling operation incorporating a mud pulse telemetry system according to the current invention is shown in
As shown in
As shown in
A preferred mechanical arrangement of the down hole pulser 12 is shown schematically in
As previously discussed, the outer housing of the drill string 6 is formed by a section of drill pipe 64, which forms the central passage 62 through which the drilling mud 18 flows. As is conventional, the drill pipe 64 has threaded couplings on each end, shown in
The annular shroud 39, shown in
The rotor 36 and stator 38 are mounted within the shroud 39. According to one aspect of the invention, the rotor 36 is located downstream of the stator 38. The stator retainer 67 is threaded into the upstream end of the annular shroud 39 and restrains the stator 38 and the wear sleeves 33 from axial motion by compressing them against a shoulder 57 formed in the shroud 39. Thus, the wear sleeves 33 can be replaced as necessary. Moreover, since the stator 38 and wear sleeves 33 are not highly loaded, they can be made of a brittle, wear resistant material, such as tungsten carbide, while the shroud 39, which is more heavily loaded but not as subject to wear from the drilling fluid, can be made of a more ductile material, such as 17-4 stainless steel.
The rotor 36 is driven by a drive train mounted in the pulser housing and includes a rotor shaft 34 mounted on upstream and downstream bearings 56 and 58 in a chamber 63. The chamber 63 is formed by upstream and downstream housing portions 66 and 68 together with a seal 60 and a barrier member 110 (as used herein, the terms upstream and downstream refer to the flow of drilling mud toward the drill bit). The seal 60 is a spring loaded lip seal. The chamber 63 is filled with a liquid, preferably a lubricating oil, that is pressurized to an internal pressure that is close to that of the external pressure of the drilling mud 18 by a piston 162 mounted in the upstream oil-filed housing portion 66. The upstream and downstream housing portions 66 and 68 that form the oil filled chamber 63 are threaded together, with the joint being sealed by O-rings 193.
As previously discussed, the rotor 36 is preferably located immediately downstream of the stator 38. The upstream face 72 of the rotor 36 is spaced from the downstream face 71 of the stator 38 by shims, not shown. Since, as discussed below, the upstream surface 72 of the rotor 36 is substantially flat, the axial gap between the stator outlet face 71 and the rotor upstream surface is substantially constant over the radial height of a blade 74. Preferably the axial gap between the upstream rotor face 72 and the downstream stator face 71 is approximately 0.030-0.060 inch (0.75-1.5 mm). The rotor 36 includes a rotor shaft 34, which is mounted within the oil-filled chamber 63 by the upstream and downstream bearings 58 and 56. The downstream end of the rotor shaft 34 is attached by a coupling 182 to the output shaft of the reduction gear 46, which may be a planetary type gear train, such as that available from Micromo, of Clearwater, Fla., and which is also mounted in the downstream oil-filled housing portion 68. The input shaft 113 to the reduction gear 46 is supported by a bearing 54 and is coupled to inner half 52 of a magnetic coupling 48, such as that available through Ugimag, of Valparaiso, Ind.
In operation, the motor 32 rotates a shaft 94 which, via the magnetic coupling 48, transmits torque through a housing barrier 110 that drives the reduction gear input shaft 113. The reduction gear drives the rotor shaft 34, thereby rotating the rotor 36. The outer half 50 of the magnetic coupling 48 is mounted within housing portion 69, which forms a chamber 65 that is filled with a gas, preferably air, the chambers 63 and 65 being separated by the barrier 110. The outer magnetic coupling half 50 is coupled to a shaft 94 which is supported on bearings 55. A flexible coupling 90 couples the shaft 94 to the electric motor 32, which rotates the drive train. The orientation encoder 47 is coupled to the motor 32. The down hole dynamic pressure sensor 28 is mounted on the drill pipe 64.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in the transverse cross sections through the blade 74 shown in
As shown best in
Preferably, the thickness of the blade is tapered in the circumferential direction so that at a given transverse cross section, such as those shown in
By shaping the blade downstream surface 73 so that it tapers in both the radial and circumferential directions, having a maximum thickness in the center of the blade hub and becoming thinner as the blade extends both radially and circumferentially outward, so as to form a tapered central rib 78, sufficient mechanical strength is imparted to the blade 74 while minimizing the thickness of the blade at its edges, thereby improving the hydrodynamic performance of the blade, as discussed below. Preferably, the profiling of the downstream surface 73 is such that the taper in the thickness is achieved smoothly and gradually without abrupt steps in thickness, as shown in
In operation, a pulse is created in the drilling mud 18 by rotating the rotor 36 into a first circumferential orientation that results in a reduced, or minimum, obstruction to the flow of drilling mud, such as shown in
Although
In one embodiment, pulses are created operating the motor 32 to place the rotor 36 into the circumferential orientation shown in
When using a prior art rotor, such as that shown in
The primary contributors to this hydrodynamic effect are believed to be (i) the locating of the rotor 36 immediately downstream of the stator 38, and (ii) the shaping of the rotor blade downstream surfaces 73 so that the blade thickness tapers as the blade extends outward in the circumferential direction from its center, thereby forming a relatively thin structure adjacent the lateral sides 75 and 76. Although not necessary to practice the current invention, in the optimal design, additional contributions to this effect are also believed to result from (i) the tapering of the blade as it extends outward in the radial direction, thereby forming relatively thin radial tips 83, (ii) the swirling of the drilling mud 18 by the stator passages 80 as shown in
With respect to the swirling of the drilling mud 18, contrary to what might be expected, it has been found that swirling the drilling mud in the clockwise direction prior to its introduction into the rotor 36 increases the opening torque F on the rotor blades in the counterclockwise direction, thereby tending to rotate the rotor away from an orientation of maximum obstruction and toward an orientation of minimum obstruction, as indicated in
With respect to the control of side leakage, it has been found that a benefit can be obtained by controlling the leakage of drilling mud passed the rotor blades when the rotor is in the orientation of maximum obstruction so that the leakage is less around one lateral side—the side facing the direction in which the rotor can rotate into an orientation of lesser obstruction—than the other lateral side. Preferably, the mechanical stops 59 are located such that the rotor will never rotate in the clockwise direction (i.e., to the right in
Although, ideally, the flow induced opening torque created by the current invention is such that the minimum obstruction orientation shown in
Preferably, such mechanical bias is obtained by incorporating a torsion spring 172 between the shafting and the pulser housing 66, as shown in
In the embodiment of the invention previously discussed, the torsion spring 172 is mounted so that it imparts a torque that combines with the flow induced opening torque when the rotor is in the maximum obstruction orientation to drive the rotor toward the minimum obstruction orientation. Further, the torsion spring 172 continues to impart a mechanical opening torque after the flow induced opening torque becomes insufficient to further rotate the rotor passed the one-quarter closed orientation shown in
If the pulser were constructed so that the minimum orientation was otherwise a stable orientation—that is, the flow induced torque alone was sufficient to maintain the rotor in the minimum obstruction orientation—the torsion spring 172 could be installed so that it imparted no torque when the rotor was in the minimum obstruction orientation and a torque tending to return the rotor to the minimum obstruction orientation whenever the rotor rotated away from that orientation.
Although the mechanical biasing of the rotor is preferably additive to the flow induced opening torque, the invention could also be practiced by employing mechanical biasing alone, such as by the torsion spring 172, while using a rotor having conventional hydrodynamic performance in which the flow induced torque tended to rotate the rotor into the maximum obstruction orientation.
Although the current invention has been illustrated by reference to certain specific embodiments, those skilled in the art, armed with the foregoing disclosure, will appreciate that many variations could be employed. For example, although the invention has been discussed in detail with reference to an oscillating type rotary pulser, the invention could also be utilized in a pulser that generated pulses by rotating a rotor in only one direction. Thus, for example, reference to a rotor “circumferential orientation” that results in a minimum obstruction to the flow of drilling fluid applies to any orientation in which the rotor blades 36 are axially aligned with the stator vanes so that, for example, in the structure shown in
Therefore, it should be appreciated that the current invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential attributes thereof and, accordingly, reference should be made to the appended claims, rather than to the foregoing specification, as indicating the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2901685 | Alder | Oct 1959 | A |
2964116 | Peterson | Dec 1960 | A |
2973505 | Johannesen | Feb 1961 | A |
3065416 | Jeter | Nov 1962 | A |
3302457 | Mayes | Feb 1967 | A |
3309656 | Godbey | Mar 1967 | A |
3693428 | LePeuvedic et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3713089 | Clacomb | Jan 1973 | A |
3732728 | Fitzpatrick | May 1973 | A |
3736558 | Cubberly, Jr. | May 1973 | A |
3737843 | LePeuvedic et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3739331 | Godbey et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3742443 | Foster et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3764968 | Anderson | Oct 1973 | A |
3764969 | Cubberly, Jr. | Oct 1973 | A |
3764970 | Manning | Oct 1973 | A |
3770006 | Sexton et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3958217 | Spinnler | May 1976 | A |
3964556 | Gearhart et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
4007805 | Reber | Feb 1977 | A |
RE29734 | Manning | Aug 1978 | E |
RE30055 | Claycomb | Jul 1979 | E |
4351037 | Scherbatskoy | Sep 1982 | A |
4462469 | Brown | Jul 1984 | A |
4499563 | Jurgens | Feb 1985 | A |
4628495 | Peppers et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4630244 | Larronde | Dec 1986 | A |
RE32463 | Westlake et al. | Jul 1987 | E |
4698794 | Kruger et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4734892 | Kotlyar | Mar 1988 | A |
4785300 | Chin et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4790393 | Larronde et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4796699 | Upchurch | Jan 1989 | A |
4847815 | Malone | Jul 1989 | A |
4914637 | Goodsman | Apr 1990 | A |
4915168 | Upchurch | Apr 1990 | A |
4956823 | Russell et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5073877 | Jeter | Dec 1991 | A |
5079750 | Scherbatskoy | Jan 1992 | A |
5113379 | Scherbatskoy | May 1992 | A |
5119344 | Innes | Jun 1992 | A |
5182731 | Hoelscher et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5189645 | Innes | Feb 1993 | A |
5215152 | Duckworth | Jun 1993 | A |
5357483 | Innes | Oct 1994 | A |
5517464 | Lerner et al. | May 1996 | A |
5586084 | Barron et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5636178 | Ritter | Jun 1997 | A |
5691712 | Meek et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5787052 | Gardner et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
6105690 | Biglin, Jr. et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6219301 | Moriarty | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6289998 | Krueger et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6469637 | Seyler et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6714138 | Turner et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 140 788 | May 1985 | EP |
0 140 788 | May 1985 | EP |
0 325 047 | Jul 1989 | EP |
0 325 047 | Jul 1989 | EP |
2 156 405 | Oct 1985 | GB |
WO 0229441 | Apr 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060034154 A1 | Feb 2006 | US |