Patent Application
20130199844
Rotary steerable drilling systems for drilling deviated boreholes into the earth are generally classified either as point-the-bit systems or push-the-bit systems. In point-the-bit systems, the axis of rotation of the drill bit is deviated from the local axis of the bottom hole assembly in the general direction of the new portion of the hole being drilled. The borehole is propagated according to customary three-point geometry defined by upper and lower stabilizer touch points and the drill bit. The angle of deviation of the drill bit axis coupled with a finite distance between the drill bit and a lower stabilizer results in a non-collinear condition required for a curve to be generated. In this type of system, the drill bit tends to have less sideways cutting because the bit axis is continually rotated in the direction of the curved borehole.
In push-the-bit rotary steerable systems, there is usually no specially identified mechanism to deviate the bit axis from the local bottom hole assembly axis. Instead, the requisite non-collinear condition is achieved when either upper or lower stabilizers are used to apply an eccentric force or displacement in a direction oriented with respect to the direction of borehole propagation. Steering is again achieved by creating non co-linearity between the drill bit and at least two other touch points. In this type of system, the drill bit is required to cut sideways to generate the desired, curved borehole.
The forces applied to create the non-colinearity and to control the direction of drilling may be provided by a variety of actuators. The actuators provide a tool face oriented to act against a desired component, e.g. against a pivotable sleeve, in a manner that changes or maintains the desired non-collinear orientation of the rotary steerable drilling system. In many applications, difficulties can arise in controlling the actuator tool face in a manner to provide the desired control over the directional drilling.
In general, the present invention provides a method for controlling the direction of drilling when using a rotary steerable system to drill a borehole. The method comprises processing parameters related to operation of a rotatable collar of the rotary steerable system. The parameters are used in cooperation with characteristics of actuators to control the positioning of an actuator tool face and thus to control the drilling orientation of the rotary steerable system.
Certain embodiments of the invention will hereafter be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements, and:
In the following description, numerous details are set forth to provide an understanding of the present invention. However, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these details and that numerous variations or modifications from the described embodiments may be possible.
The present invention generally relates to a control technique for controlling the lateral movement of a rotary steerable system and thus the direction of drilling with respect to a borehole. For point and push the bit rotary steerable systems, a steering bias unit mechanism may comprise a sleeve articulated about a universal joint, as employed in a variety of rotary steerable systems. In one type of system, actuators react against an inside of the sleeve and an outside of a collar rotated during a drilling operation. Considering the sleeve as a free body, the points of contact with external objects are the bit, on-sleeve stabilizer, and the actuator(s) (and a strike ring when then sleeve is at full articulation). Both the stabilizer contact point with the formation and the actuator reaction point are behind the universal joint, i.e. on an opposite side of the joint relative to the drill bit.
For the sleeve to maintain a geostationary tool face as the collar rotates, the actuators need to be fired in the appropriate order and at the correct time to ensure the actuator force acts on the sleeve with the correct geostationary tool face. For the rotary steerable tool application envisaged for this algorithm, various actuators may be employed. Examples of suitable actuators able to act against the sleeve comprise solenoid operated valve actuators which open and close ports directing pressurized mud flow onto hinged actuator pads that transmit a force (due to conservation of momentum of the mud flow) against the inside of the sleeve. The whole actuator assembly, including the solenoid, valve and pad may be referred to as a bi-stable valve actuator, in light of the fact it is stable in two states, either on (pad open) or off (pad closed). According to one embodiment, an actuator tool face control algorithm is employed to control the actuator tool face, and an assumption may be made that a perfect collar position and speed estimate is available.
Referring generally to
The actuator tool face 22 may be a control open loop having for its demand tool face 20 a desired input, as represented by block 32. The desired input may comprise, for example, either directional driller commands or commands derived from inclination, azimuth or hold the line controllers. The desired input is relayed to compensator 24 and on to an actuator tool face controller 34 which processes a variety of parameters to facilitate control of the actuator tool face 22. By way of example, the parameters may comprise inputs such as a collar angular position estimate and a collar angular rate estimate, as represented by block 36. In some applications, a set of algorithm parameters also may be loaded as constants in the downhole tool software. The various parameters/inputs are processed according to the desired actuator tool face algorithm 38 and output to the appropriate actuator hardware 40, such as bi-stable valve actuator hardware (if the actuators comprise bi-stable valve actuators). The demand tool face 20 and collar parameters (and possibly additional parameters) are used by the actuator tool face controller 34 to control the firing order of the actuators, e.g. bi-stable valve actuators, for a given collar speed and position estimate.
For example, based on a collar position estimate and other variables, the algorithm 38 is employed to evaluate the on and off angular tool face firing angles at which each of the actuators is triggered. According to one embodiment, the algorithm is used to evaluate on and off angular tool face firing angles at which each of four bi-stable valve actuators is triggered. Examples of variables employed comprise target tool face angle, tool face dwell angle (symmetrical angle interval either side of target angle), firing angle tolerance, and the assumed switching time of the bi-stable valve units.
The switching of the actuators between off and on states is illustrated graphically in
On=θ−Δ−δ/2
Off=θ+δ/2
The dwell angular interval will be independent of collar speed (other than to be optimized off line in terms of bi-stable valve performance in relation to collar speed), whereas the on to off bi-stable valve angular interval will vary directly as a function of collar rpm. This relationship may be expressed as follows:
Δ=(RPM/60)τ360
where τ is the on to off response time of the bi-stable valve and Δ has units of degrees for the expression given.
Hence, at any instant (given the angular collar speed), the on and off triggering angular positions are evaluated. By use of, for example, latched logic a falling edge 42, 44 is triggered at an angular tolerance 46 (to allow for hysteresis) about the computed on or off firing collar angle, as illustrated in
In at least some of the embodiments described herein, the control system comprises a quadrature based interpolation on line signal conditioning of the radial tool face control sensor signals in order to gain match and remove the sensor biases on the quadrature radial tool face control signals. By way of further explanation and according to at least one embodiment of the present invention, implementation of the tool face control of a strap down tool involves an accurate collar position measurement in order to control the timing of the bi-stable actuator firings. This may be achieved by taking the arctangent of two quadrature signals, obtained from radially oriented pairs of magnetometers rotating with the collar. A consideration with respect to accuracy of the angular position measurement obtained in this way is the degree to which the pair of quadrature signals (necessarily sinusoidal due to collar rotation) are bias free (centered on zero signal) and gain matched (both having equal magnitude amplitudes). In practice, (usually due to noise and limitations in sensor quality—often driven by cost), the raw quadrature signals are poorly gain matched and have differing dc offsets.
Fortunately, with strap down rotary steerable system (RSS) drilling tools the following simple algorithm can be used to both strip out dc biases and gain match the quadrature signals. The algorithm, e.g. algorithm 38, operates on line and is split into two phases. The first phase removes the dc biases from each quadrature signal. The second phase then normalizes both quadrature signals, and hence gain matches them, so that both are dc bias free unit amplitude sine waves at quadrature. The arctangent of the two quadrature unit amplitude sine waves is then taken to obtain the collar angular position. For phase one, the dc bias is evaluated by identifying the maximum and minimum peak amplitude of each of the quadrature sine waves, then the dc offset correction for each of the sine waves is simply taken as half the sum of the absolute value of their maximum and minimum values, with this computed offset correction subtracted from the signals and so centering them on zero signal. One aspect of the algorithm for evaluating the maximum and minimum sine wave amplitudes used by the algorithm is a search sub-algorithm that recursively checks the instantaneous signal value against stored maximum or minimum values and updates these values if they are exceeded by the instantaneous signal.
To allow for slow variation in the quadrature signal amplitude, a per sample decay factor (close to unity but not exactly unity, with the decay factor value being related to the update rate of the search algorithm) is applied to the stored maximum or minimum values per update period. This adaptive search algorithm therefore assumes the signal amplitude variation over one period of the base quadrature signal period is not significant. For phase two, to normalize the two quadrature signals the evaluated sine wave amplitude for each quadrature sine wave (the dc bias corrected maximum signal value) is simply divided into the dc bias corrected signal, so normalizing it. Using the algorithm described above, it is possible to accurately measure the collar angular position using low cost non-survey quality magnetometers for strap down RSS tools.
Accordingly, the present invention may comprise a sub-algorithm of algorithm 38 that enables the evaluation of an angular collar position estimate for the tool face actuator firing timing algorithm 38 based on quadrature signal processing of low cost, poorly gain matched and dc bias offset magnetometer transducers (where the combination of the low cost magnetometer transducers and the associated signal quadrature processing constitutes the angular collar position sensor). The overall actuator tool face control algorithm principle is scalable in terms of the number of bi-stable actuators included in the overall tool face control actuator and could equally work for 1, 2, 3, 4 or more bi-stable actuators.
If the actuators employed are, for example, bi-stable solenoid actuators, the algorithm 38 also may be designed to compensate for or address certain actuator characteristics. For mechanical and electrical reasons, bi-stable solenoid actuators can fire erratically at low and high speed switching rates associated with tracking very low and very high collar rpm speeds which may occur down-hole due to the rotary steerable system drilling tool phenomena of stick slip. Therefore, certain embodiments of the tool face control algorithm 38 include under and over speed modes whereby if the collar speed drops below or rises above threshold rpm values (e.g. 30 and 400 rpm, respectively, although a variety of other threshold values may be employed), the algorithm ignores the collar position and speed estimates and simply fires/actuates the bi-stable solenoid actuators as if the collar were running at a steady rpm rate within the operating specification (e.g. 60 and 360 rpm, respectively, although a variety of other specified rotational rates may be selected).
Consequently, this embodiment of the control system always operates so the bi-stable solenoid actuators are switching in a controlled manner and erratic bi-stable solenoid actuator switching is avoided to prevent excessive power draw and possible system shut down. To prevent the system from hunting between normal and over/under speed modes, hysteresis is included on the threshold rpm values at which the over and under speed modes engage and disengage by simply making the collar rpm threshold value at which over or under speed mode engages different than the threshold collar rpm value at which it disengages. The collar rpm triggered under speed mode also has the advantage that it provides the tool with an auto-shallow hole test mode whereby if the tool is powered up but not rotating the tool automatically goes into under speed mode and fires/actuates the bi-stable solenoid actuators as if the tool were rotating at a steady speed, e.g. 60 rpm or another suitable speed. This capability is helpful for performing surface shallow hole tests in the field to check for basic system functionality prior to inserting the tool into the well.
The auto under or over speed mode also has advantages from a tool steering point of view in that the actuator tool face in either of these modes cycles (nutate) as if the tool were in the neutral steer phase at a cycle rate equal to the difference between the actual collar rpm rate and the collar rpm rate at which the bi-stable solenoid actuators are fired via the under or over speed mode. This tends to create the effect of making the tool steer a tangent to its instantaneous path, which is preferable to the tool propagation being completely out of control in an over or under speed event.
Accordingly, the algorithm 38 may employ over and under speed modes to avoid erratic bi-stable solenoid actuator switching. At threshold collar rpm values (with differing enable/disable values to apply switching hysteresis and thus avoid hunting between modes), the bi-stable solenoid actuators are fired as if the collar is rotating at a steady speed well within the operating specification of the tool. The under speed mode also provides the ‘shallow hole test’ mode which is useful in field test situations. Another benefit is that the over and under speed modes may be employed to ensure the tool steering is always under control with the tool drilling a tangent to its instantaneous path during an over or under speed event.
Referring generally to
The manipulation of sleeve 62 is performed by a plurality of actuators 66 which receive commands from the actuator tool face controller 34 following processing of the parameters employed to facilitate control of the actuator tool face 22, as described above. By way of example, actuators 66 may comprise bi-stable valve/solenoid actuators. The orientation of sleeve 62 and its sleeve tool face 26 may be achieved by articulating the sleeve 62 about a joint 68, such as a universal joint. Manipulation of sleeve 62 about joint 68 enables precise control over the orientation of the tool 28, e.g. sleeve 62/drill bit 58, and thus over the direction of drilling pursuant to operation of the control system as outlined above with reference to
Additional control system components may be removed, added or substituted; and the configuration and arrangement of components may be adjusted to suit a particular application. Furthermore, the control system algorithms and/or input parameters may be changed or adjusted to accommodate specifics of a given drilling operation.
Although only a few embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail above, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible without materially departing from the teachings of this invention. Accordingly, such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this invention as defined in the claims.
The present document is based on and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/356,476, filed Jun. 18, 2010.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/IB11/01481 | 4/21/2011 | WO | 00 | 4/25/2013 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61356476 | Jun 2010 | US |
