1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to rotatable members for machines and, more particularly, to a rotatable assembly for a machine.
2. Description of the Related Art
It is known to provide a machine such as a waste processing machine to reduce waste material. The waste processing machine typically includes a rotatable assembly such as a rotor assembly. The rotor assembly generally includes a rotor and a plurality of processing tools attached to the rotor for reducing the waste material as the rotor rotates. An example of such a waste processing machine is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,863,003 to Smith. In that patent, the rotor assembly comprises a generally cylindrical rotor onto which a plurality of processing tools is mounted. The rotor is mounted to a coaxially disposed shaft by multiple plate-like braces extending tangentially from the outer surface of the shaft to the inner surface of the rotor. There are two sets of braces, and each set is attached at opposing ends of the rotor.
In operation, an engine operatively rotates the shaft, which causes the rotor to rotate. As waste material passes by the rotor, the processing tools attached to the rotor contact the waste material, cut or reduce the waste material, and expel the reduced waste material from the waste processing machine.
Rigid attachments, for example welds, join the individual braces to the rotor and shaft. When non-grindable materials, such as rocks and other hard debris, enter the waste processing machine, the processing tools are unable to break them down. Instead, when the processing tools impact the non-grindables, the impact force transfers through the rotor, through the braces, and into the shaft as a concentrated or shock load. More specifically, loading of the first and second sets of braces results in a torsional load and bending load in the same plane on the shaft. These combined loads can cause deformation or breakage of the drive end of the shaft, which renders it inoperable. Users can replace the shaft, but replacement typically costs a significant amount of money and machine downtime.
One attempt to solve this problem is to increase the diameter of the shaft. As such, the bulkier or larger diameter shaft can withstand higher stresses or concentrated loads, making it less likely to deform or break when the processing tools contact non-grindable material. However, the larger diameter shafts cost more to make, which is undesired. Moreover, increasing the diameter of the shaft does not ensure other components in the rotor assembly will withstand the high stresses caused by the non-grindables. For example, a belt typically drives the shaft during operation. When the processing tools impact the non-grindables, the resultant shock load may cause the belt to break, costing the user significant time and money for repair. Therefore, there is a need in the art for an assembly that can better withstand the high impact forces and concentrated loads.
Accordingly, the present invention is a rotatable assembly for a machine. The rotatable assembly includes a rotatable shaft having a longitudinal axis and a rotatable member disposed about the shaft. The rotatable assembly also includes at least one first connecting member operatively mounted to the rotatable member and to the shaft at a first location along the longitudinal axis of the shaft. The rotatable assembly includes at least one second connecting member operatively mounted to the rotatable member and located at a second location spaced from the first location along the longitudinal axis of the shaft. The rotatable assembly further includes a bearing operatively mounted to the shaft, wherein the second connecting member is operatively mounted to the bearing to allow the shaft to twist without permanent deformation when a concentrated load is subjected to the shaft as the rotatable member is rotated.
One advantage of the present invention is that a rotatable assembly is provided for a machine having a bearing that allows twisting of the shaft so that the shaft experiences less detrimental shock and concentrated loading. Another advantage of the present invention is that the rotatable assembly allows a diameter of a shaft to be reduced by keeping stress in a manageable range for the same deflection, thereby saving material and manufacturing costs. Yet another advantage of the present invention is that the rotatable assembly prevents concentrated stress from being in the same plane for torsion or bending. Still another advantage of the present invention is that the rotatable assembly has other components attached to the shaft, such as drive belts and the like, which last longer due to the reduced stress. A further advantage of the present invention is that the rotatable assembly increases the operating life of the shaft, lessening the expense and time of repairs to and replacement of the rotatable assembly.
Other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will be readily appreciated, as the same becomes better understood, after reading the subsequent description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings.
Referring now to the drawings and in particular to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The rotor assembly 30 includes at least one, preferably a plurality of first connecting members, generally indicated at 41. The first connecting members 41 are operatively mounted to the rotor 40 and to the shaft 42 such that rotation of the shaft 42 causes rotation of the rotor 40. In the embodiment illustrated in
Additionally, the rotor assembly 30 includes at least one, preferably a plurality of second connecting members, generally indicated at 53. The second connecting members 53 are operatively mounted to the rotor 40 and extend toward the shaft 42. In the embodiment illustrated, each of the second connecting members 53 is a second brace 44. Preferably, each second brace 44 is an elongated plate-like member having a generally rectangular shape. The second brace 44 has a proximal end 44a and a distal end 44b. The distal end 44b is secured to the inner surface 45 of the rotor 40 by suitable means such as welding. The proximal end 44a is fixed tangentially to a bearing 52 to be described by suitable means such as welding. It should be appreciated that the first braces 44 are spaced circumferentially about the bearing 52. It should also be appreciated that, in the embodiment illustrated, three first braces 43 and three second braces 44 are illustrated, but in other embodiments, any number of first braces 43 or second braces 44 could be employed. It should further be appreciated that the rotor 40 and shaft 42 are coaxially aligned.
As illustrated in
In one embodiment, the bearing 52 is of a plane bearing type having no rolling members. The plane bearing is a self-lubricating bearing. Preferably, the bearing 52 is a plastic laminate with a metal backing. In another embodiment, the bearing 52 has a suitable bearing structure such as a babbit and having no rolling members. In yet another embodiment, the bearing 52 is a bronze solid bearing having no rolling members. The bearing 52 is commercially available from Garlock Bearings Inc. The bearing 52 has at least one sleeve, preferably an inner sleeve 54 and an outer sleeve 56. The inner sleeve 54 is disposed about the shaft 42, and the second braces 44 are operatively mounted to the outer sleeve 56 by suitable means such as welding. It should be appreciated that the first braces 43 are operatively mounted to the shaft 42 at a first location 59a and the second braces 44 are operatively mounted to the outer sleeve 56 of the bearing 52 at a second location 59b spaced longitudinally from the first location 59a along the longitudinal axis of the shaft 42. It should also be appreciated that, as described in greater detail below, the bearing 52 allows the shaft 42 to twist without permanent deformation in response to a concentrated loading of the shaft 42. It should further be appreciated that, as described below in greater detail, the bearing 52 reduces stress on the shaft 42.
Referring to
In operation, the drive assembly 60 advances the drive belt 64, which rotates the pulley 62 and the attached shaft 42, which in turn rotates the rotor 40, in the direction of arrow A shown in
However, if one of the processing tools 50 impacts a non-grindable object, such as a rock, the impact force is transferred through the respective mounting arms 46 and into the rotor 40. The impact force or load in the rotor 40 is transferred through both the first and second braces 43 and 44 to the shaft 42 and the bearing 52, respectively. The force or load transferred directly to the shaft 42 impedes the rotation of the rotor 40 at the point of impact in the direction of arrow B. The force transferred into the second braces 44 merely transfers into the bearing 52, and the bearing 52 allows the second braces 44 to rotate relative to the shaft 42. The drive assembly 60 continues to drive or rotate the rotor 40 in the direction of arrow A. As such, the shaft 42 twists one end with respect to the other to allow the non-grindable object to pass the processing tools 50 and the shaft 42 returns back to its original state without breakage or deformation of the shaft 42.
In one example, the processing tools 50 can twist three to four inches while the shaft 42 twists one-quarter inches. The bearing 52 pushes over a large surface such that there is no concentrated load due to bending on the shaft 42 and the distance between the drive assembly 60 and the first braces 43 is relatively large such that there is no concentrated load due to torsion. As such, the stress cannot be concentrated in the same plane for torsion and bending.
Advantageously, the shaft 42 is less likely to deform because one end can twist relative to the other without permanent deformation. As a result, the diameter of the shaft 42 can be reduced without significantly reducing its operating life. This saves on manufacturing and replacement costs. Also, the components of the drive assembly 60 that are attached to the shaft 40 last longer due to the reduced stress on the shaft 40.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Also, the rotor assembly 330 includes the first and second connecting members 341 and 353. The second connecting member 353 may include the second braces 44 of
Referring to
The rotor assembly 330 includes at least one, preferably a plurality of gussets 383. One of the gussets 383 is positioned within one of slots 382. The gussets 383 are made of a metal material. The gussets 383 are mounted and secured to the shaft 342 and the disk 379 by a suitable mechanism such as welding.
The rotor assembly 330 further includes a ring 381 disposed about the inner surface 345 of the rotor 340. The ring 381 includes at least one, preferably a plurality of apertures 385 spaced circumferentially and arranged in a pattern corresponding to that of the apertures 384 of the disk 379. The ring 381 is made of a metal material. The ring 381 is mounted and secured to the inner surface 345 of the rotor 340 by a suitable mechanism such as welding. The ring 381 extends radially inward toward the shaft 342. The disk 379 and the ring 381 are axially aligned and each aperture 384 of the disk 379 is aligned with a corresponding aperture 385 of the ring 381.
The rotor assembly 330 includes the disk 379 releasably mounted to the ring 381. The rotor assembly 330 includes at least one, preferably a plurality of fasteners 386 extending through the apertures 384 and 385. The fasteners 386 are of a knurled wheel stud type (Part No. 610-209) and of a wheel nut type (Part No. 611-028) commercially available from Dorman. The nuts preferably have a chamfer. It should be appreciated that the apertures 385 in the ring 381 are accurate enough to hold a wheel lug without machining costs and have a tolerance of 0.005 inches to locate the shaft 342 on center. It should also be appreciated that the rotor assembly 330 of
Accordingly, the rotor assembly 30, 130, 230, 330 of the present invention has a bearing 52, 152, 252, 352 that allows twisting of the shaft 40, 140, 240, 340 so that the shaft 40, 140, 240, 340 experiences less detrimental shock and concentrated loading. The rotor assembly 30, 130, 230, 330 allows the diameter of the shaft 40, 140, 240, 340 to be reduced because stress on the shaft 40, 140, 240, 340 is relatively low, thereby saving material and manufacturing costs. The rotor assembly 30, 130, 230, 330 also prevents concentrated stress from being in the same plane for torsion or bending. Also, other components of the drive assembly that are attached to the shaft 40, 140, 240, 340, such as drive belts and the like, last longer due to the reduced stress. As a result, the rotor assembly 30, 130, 230, 330 has an increased operating life, thereby lessening repair time and expense. It should be appreciated that the diameter of the shaft controls cost of bearing.
The present invention has been described in an illustrative manner. It is to be understood that the terminology, which has been used, is intended to be in the nature of words of description rather than of limitation.
Many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. Therefore, within the scope of the appended claims, the present invention may be practiced other than as specifically described.
The present application claims the priority date of co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/558,053, filed Mar. 31, 2004.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
190675 | Gaines | May 1877 | A |
589236 | Williams | Aug 1897 | A |
604283 | Albrecht | May 1898 | A |
787290 | Griffin | Apr 1905 | A |
1266894 | Williams | May 1918 | A |
1559924 | Willcox | Nov 1925 | A |
1713507 | Ammon | May 1929 | A |
1752290 | Ammon | Apr 1930 | A |
1761083 | Liggett | Jun 1930 | A |
1860519 | Wickersham | May 1932 | A |
1889129 | Nielsen | Nov 1932 | A |
1902721 | Reynolds | Mar 1933 | A |
2026790 | Mankoff | Jan 1936 | A |
2128194 | Sheldon et al. | Aug 1938 | A |
2244577 | Schreiber | Jun 1941 | A |
2318219 | Harris | May 1943 | A |
2392958 | Tice | Jan 1946 | A |
2663505 | Sennholtz | Dec 1953 | A |
2705596 | Poyser | Apr 1955 | A |
2710635 | Alexander | Jun 1955 | A |
2863476 | Clark | Dec 1958 | A |
2864420 | Schmidt | Dec 1958 | A |
2900069 | Manns et al. | Aug 1959 | A |
3035682 | Ferch | May 1962 | A |
3194543 | McIlvaine | Jul 1965 | A |
3203532 | Mimnaugh et al. | Aug 1965 | A |
3254687 | Tertyshnikov | Jun 1966 | A |
3367585 | Ratkowski | Feb 1968 | A |
3436028 | Koehnen et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
3509924 | Newhouse, Jr. | May 1970 | A |
3642214 | Blackwell, Jr. | Feb 1972 | A |
3844494 | Hightower | Oct 1974 | A |
3907016 | Nicholson et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
4000859 | Whitney | Jan 1977 | A |
4060961 | Anderson et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4074594 | Dall et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4076177 | Hirayama et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4077450 | Ackerman | Mar 1978 | A |
4077573 | Kersey et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4117985 | Lazareck | Oct 1978 | A |
4129260 | Baker | Dec 1978 | A |
4129262 | Lowry | Dec 1978 | A |
4146184 | Whitney | Mar 1979 | A |
4146185 | Schober | Mar 1979 | A |
4162769 | Lapointe | Jul 1979 | A |
4162770 | Lewis | Jul 1979 | A |
4168035 | Palm et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4344581 | Redemann | Aug 1982 | A |
4504019 | Newell et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4558826 | Martinek | Dec 1985 | A |
4573643 | Orphall et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4688731 | Hunt et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4702424 | Widlak | Oct 1987 | A |
4717083 | Quast et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4848681 | Eriksson et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4850406 | Krautzberger | Jul 1989 | A |
4872500 | Duffey et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4915310 | Stelk | Apr 1990 | A |
4917314 | Manschwetus | Apr 1990 | A |
4922977 | Colton et al. | May 1990 | A |
4967969 | Griffith, III | Nov 1990 | A |
4982904 | Greiner | Jan 1991 | A |
5002233 | Williams | Mar 1991 | A |
5042727 | Plante | Aug 1991 | A |
5044567 | Hausler et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5078328 | Willingham | Jan 1992 | A |
5114085 | Inui | May 1992 | A |
5205496 | O'Donnell et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5209278 | Carpenter et al. | May 1993 | A |
5285974 | Cesarini | Feb 1994 | A |
5372316 | Bateman | Dec 1994 | A |
5377919 | Rogers et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5381971 | Rehmer | Jan 1995 | A |
5392999 | Konig et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5404993 | Scarro | Apr 1995 | A |
5413286 | Bateman | May 1995 | A |
5435689 | Stonehouse | Jul 1995 | A |
5474239 | Williams, Jr. et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5507441 | De Boef et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5526988 | Rine | Jun 1996 | A |
5529249 | Braun et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5611496 | Fleenor | Mar 1997 | A |
5713525 | Morey | Feb 1998 | A |
5743314 | Puch | Apr 1998 | A |
5863003 | Smith | Jan 1999 | A |
5938129 | Forsyth | Aug 1999 | A |
6016979 | Squires et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6047912 | Smith | Apr 2000 | A |
6059210 | Smith | May 2000 | A |
6299082 | Smith | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6517020 | Smith | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6845931 | Smith | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6978955 | Verhoef et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
60-140645 | Sep 1985 | JP |
64-7960 | Jan 1989 | JP |
1-65650 | Apr 1989 | JP |
8-299825 | Nov 1996 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60558053 | Mar 2004 | US |