The present invention pertains to a rotatable bit that in operation rotates about its central longitudinal axis so as to engage a substrate such as, for example, earth strata. More specifically, the invention pertains to such a rotatable bit that includes a resilient retainer sleeve wherein the rotatable bit is held via the resilient retainer sleeve within the bore of a holder that is a part of an assembly used to engage the earth strata.
There are a number of different types of circumstances (or applications) wherein a rotatable bit is used to engage a substrate (e.g., earth strata). These different circumstances use assemblies such as a rotary drum, a cutting chain, a scrapper (or scarifier) blade, and drilling equipment (e.g., augers). Examples of these applications include underground mining, surface mining, dredging, construction road planning, trenching, road grading, and snow/ice removal.
In some of the above applications, the rotatable bit is subjected to an intermittent type of engagement (or cutting) of the substrate. For example, when a rotatable bit is mounted to a rotary drum of a road planning machine, the bit cycles in and out of engagement with the substrate (e.g., the cut) as the drum rotates. The same is true with respect to a rotatable bit used on a cutter chain. Even in scrapper blade applications the rotatable bit experiences an intermittent engagement (or cutting action) with the earth strata due to the fact that the rotatable bits periodically are not in engagement with the earth strata when the blade passes over low areas of the substrate surface.
In intermittent engagement applications, such as, for example, road planning, at any one time there are a number of the rotatable bits that are not in engagement with the substrate. When the rotatable bits that are in engagement with the substrate encounter an obstacle (e.g. a man hole cover) the rotational speed of the drum quickly reduces so that the forces exerted on the rotatable bit operate so as to try to eject the rotatable bit from the bore of the holder. Unless there is sufficient force to retain the rotatable bit in its holder, these forces will eject the rotatable bit from the bore of its holder. In order to maintain the rotatable bit in its holder, it has been necessary to use a retainer that has radially outwardly projecting dimples. This type of arrangement is along the lines of the block-rotatable tool combination disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,752,515 to Oaks et al.
In the arrangement such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,752,515, the bore has an annular groove near the rearward end of the bore. Each rotatable bit has a rearward shank that contains a reduced diameter portion that carries a resilient retainer ring that has a plurality of radial outwardly projecting dimples. When the rotatable bit is inserted into the bore, the resilient retainer ring is compressed as the drilling bit slides (or is forced) into the bore. At the point wherein the dimples register with the annular groove, the resilient retainer ring expands so that the dimples are received within the annular groove. The reception (or engagement) of the dimples by the annular groove retains the rotatable bit within the bore of the holder during the operation of the assembly.
Another arrangement designed to retain a rotatable bit in a bore of a holder is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,201,421 to Den Besten et al. In this arrangement, the long resilient retainer sleeve extends for a substantial length of the shank of the rotatable bit. The fact that the sleeve extends along a substantial length of the shank provides for sufficient force to retain the rotatable bit in the bore of the holder. The long resilient retainer sleeve has been used on rotatable bits employed in road planning applications.
In the past, drilling assemblies have been used to drill holes in substrates such as earth strata. One version of such a drilling assembly is a bullet tooth rock auger sold by Reedrill, a division of Metso Minerals of Sherman, Tex., as a Texoma® auger tool. This bullet tooth rock auger comprises an auger that includes a central shaft with a helical auger flight affixed to the central shaft. A plurality of holders are affixed to the distal end of the central shaft. The helical auger flight has a peripheral edge. Holders are affixed to the lower portion of the helical auger flight at the peripheral edge thereof.
In a drilling operation, the rotatable bit is in constant contact (or engagement) with the substrate (e.g., earth strata). As a result, there is not the sudden force exerted on the rotatable bit to eject the bit from the holder. This means that there is not the same requirement for a retainer that retains the rotatable bit in the bore of the holder against a sudden ejecting force. However, even though the requirement for the retaining force is not as great in a drilling application as other applications, heretofore, rotatable bits used in drilling applications (i.e., drilling bits) still use a retainer such as in U.S. Pat. No. 3,752,515 to Oaks et al.
To eject the drilling bit from the bore of the holder, the operator strikes the rear end of the drilling bit. Such an impact forces the drilling bit from the bore of the holder. It is intended that upon striking the drilling bit, the resilient retainer ring will be compressed so that there no longer is any engagement of the dimples by the annular groove. The drilling bit then can be forced out of the bore by additional impacts on the rearward end of the drilling bit.
During the drilling operation, there is a build up of dirt and other debris in the bore of the holder. Some of this debris collects between the resilient retainer ring and the reduced diameter portion of the drilling bit. The presence of this debris between the resilient retainer ring and the reduced diameter portion of the drilling bit obstructs the compression of the retainer ring. This makes it difficult for the retainer ring to compress when the operator strikes the rear end of the drilling bit. In those cases where the resilient retainer ring does not fully compress, the dimples must be sheared off in order for the drilling bit to be extracted from the bore of the holder. As can be appreciated, it can sometimes take a lot of effort and time to remove drilling bits from their corresponding holders if the dimples have to be sheared off to remove the drilling bit because the resilient ring experiences difficulty compressing due to the presence of the debris between the resilient retainer ring and the reduced diameter portion of the drilling bit. An increase in the time and effort needed to remove the drilling bits increases the overall cost of a drilling operation.
It would very desirable to provide an improved drilling bit that is not susceptible to difficulties associated with the built up (or accumulation) of debris between the resilient retainer ring and the reduced diameter portion of the drilling bit. More specifically, it would be desirable to provide an improved drilling bit wherein the resilient retainer is not susceptible to an inability to compress due to the collection of dirt and debris between the retainer and the reduced diameter portion of the drilling bit.
In one form, the invention is a drilling bit for use in conjunction with a holder that has a bore wherein the drilling bit comprises a drilling bit body that has an axial forward end and an axial rearward end. The drilling bit body further includes a reduced diameter portion adjacent to the axial rearward end thereof so as to define a reduced diameter surface. The drilling bit further includes a hard insert that is affixed to the drilling bit body at the axial forward end thereof. The drilling bit also includes a resilient retainer sleeve that has a first thickness and presents an interior surface. The retainer sleeve is carried by the drilling bit body within the reduced diameter portion. The resilient retainer sleeve is in an expanded condition when the drilling bit is not within the bore of the holder. The resilient retainer sleeve is in a compressed condition when the drilling bit is within the bore of the holder. The clearance between the reduced diameter surface of the drilling bit body and the interior surface of the resilient retainer sleeve when the resilient retainer sleeve is in its compressed condition is at least as great as the first thickness of the resilient retainer sleeve.
In still another form the invention is a rotatable bit assembly for use in an operation to engage a substrate wherein the rotatable bit is in generally continuous engagement with the substrate. The assembly comprises a holder that has a bore. The assembly further includes a rotatable bit with a rotatable bit body that has an axial forward end and an axial rearward end. The rotatable bit body further includes a reduced diameter portion adjacent to the axial rearward end thereof so as to define a reduced diameter surface. The rotatable bit further includes a hard insert that is affixed to the rotatable bit body at the axial forward end thereof. The rotatable bit also includes a resilient retainer sleeve that has a first thickness and presents an interior surface. The retainer sleeve is carried by the rotatable bit body within the reduced diameter portion. The resilient retainer sleeve is in an expanded condition when the rotatable bit is not within the bore of the holder. The resilient retainer sleeve is in a compressed condition when the rotatable bit is within the bore of the holder. The clearance between the reduced diameter surface of the rotatable bit body and the interior surface of the resilient retainer sleeve when the resilient retainer sleeve is in its compressed condition is at least as great as the thickness of the resilient retainer sleeve.
In yet another form thereof, the invention is a resilient retainer sleeve for use on a rotatable drilling bit retained in a bore of a holder wherein the drilling bit body has an axial forward end and an axial rearward end with a shank adjacent the axial rearward end. The drilling bit body further includes a reduced diameter portion in the shank that defines a reduced diameter surface. The resilient retainer sleeve comprises a retainer sleeve body that has a first thickness and presents an interior surface. The retainer sleeve body is carried by the drilling bit body within the reduced diameter portion. The retainer sleeve body is in an expanded condition when the drilling bit is not within the bore of the holder and the retainer sleeve body is in a compressed condition when the drilling bit being within the bore of the holder. The clearance between the reduced diameter surface of the drilling bit body and the interior surface of the retainer sleeve body (when the retainer sleeve body is in its compressed condition) is at least as great as the thickness of the retainer sleeve body.
In yet another form thereof, the invention is an auger drill for engaging a substrate wherein the auger drill comprises a central auger shaft with a helical flight on the auger shaft. The helical flight has a leading edge. At least one drilling bit is connected to the helical flight adjacent the leading edge wherein the drilling bit is retained in a bore of a holder. The drilling bit comprises a drilling bit body that has an axial forward end and an axial rearward end. The drilling bit body further includes a reduced diameter portion adjacent to the axial rearward end thereof defining a reduced diameter surface. A hard insert is affixed to the drilling bit body at the axial forward end thereof. A resilient retainer sleeve has a first thickness and presents an interior surface. The retainer sleeve is carried by the drilling bit body within the reduced diameter portion. The resilient retainer sleeve is in an expanded condition when the drilling bit is not within the bore of the holder and the resilient retainer sleeve is in a compressed condition when the drilling bit being within the bore of the holder. The clearance between the reduced diameter surface of the drilling bit body and the interior surface of the resilient retainer sleeve when the resilient retainer sleeve is in its compressed condition is at least as great as the first thickness of the resilient retainer sleeve.
In still another form thereof, the invention is a drilling bit for use in conjunction with a holder having a bore. The drilling bit comprises a drilling bit body that has an axial forward end and an axial rearward end, and a reduced diameter portion (that has a diameter) adjacent to the axial rearward end thereof so as to define a reduced diameter surface. A hard insert is affixed to the drilling bit body at the axial forward end thereof. A resilient retainer sleeve has a first thickness and presents an interior surface. The retainer sleeve is carried by the drilling bit body within the reduced diameter portion. The ratio of the first thickness of the resilient retainer sleeve to the diameter of the reduced diameter portion ranges between about 0.08 and about 0.12.
In another form thereof, the invention is an auger drilling bit body retainer sleeve for use on a rotatable drilling bit body wherein the drilling bit body further includes a reduced diameter portion. The retainer sleeve comprises a retainer sleeve body that has a thickness and presents an exterior surface that is generally smooth. The retainer sleeve body is carried by the drilling bit body within the reduced diameter portion. The retainer sleeve body has a first axial length. The reduced diameter portion has a first diameter. The first axial length of the retainer sleeve body is less than the first diameter of the reduced diameter portion.
In yet another form thereof, the invention is a drilling bit that comprises a drilling bit body that has an axial forward end and an axial rearward end. The drilling bit body further includes a reduced diameter portion adjacent to the axial rearward end thereof wherein the reduced diameter portion has a groove diameter. The drilling bit body also includes a larger diameter shank portion axial forward of the reduced diameter portion wherein the larger diameter shank portion has a shank diameter. There is a hard insert that is affixed to the drilling bit body at the axial forward end thereof. A resilient retainer sleeve is carried by the drilling bit body within the reduced diameter portion wherein the resilient retainer sleeve has a thickness that is less than or equal to one-half of the dimensional difference between the shank diameter and the groove diameter.
In still another form thereof, the invention is a drilling bit that comprises a drilling bit body that has an axial forward end and an axial rearward end. The drilling bit body further includes a reduced diameter portion adjacent to the axial rearward end thereof wherein the reduced diameter portion has a groove diameter. The drilling bit body also includes a larger diameter shank portion axial forward of the reduced diameter portion wherein the larger diameter shank portion has a shank diameter. A hard insert is affixed to the drilling bit body at the axial forward end thereof. A resilient retainer sleeve is carried by the drilling bit body within the reduced diameter portion. The resilient retainer sleeve has an exterior surface that is generally smooth. The ratio of the groove diameter to the shank diameter ranges between about 0.69 and about 0.80.
The following is a brief description of the drawings wherein these drawings form a part of this patent application:
Referring to the drawings,
The drilling apparatus 20 also includes a helical auger flight 26 on the auger shaft 22 wherein the auger flight 26 has a leading edge 28. The helical auger flight 26 has the shape of a helix that essentially is generally spiral in shape.
The lower portion (shown by brackets 30 in
Each drilling assembly 34 comprises two principal parts; namely, the holder generally referred to as 36 and the rotatable bit (or the drilling bit) generally referred to as 38. In regard to one specific embodiment of the holder 36 and referring to
Referring to
The overall axial length of drilling bit body 60 is shown by dimension “A” in FIG. 3. The typical range for dimension “A” is between about 2 inches [56 millimeters] and about 7 inches [178 millimeters]. A more preferred range for dimension “A” is between about 3.3 inches [85 millimeters] and about 5 inches [127 millimeters]. A most preferred range for dimension “A” is between about 4.6 inches [118 millimeters] and about 5 inches [127 millimeters].
The drilling bit body 60 also has a head portion 66 near the axial forward end 62. The drilling bit body 60 contains a socket 68 in the axial forward end 62 thereof. The socket 68 may take on any one of a number of different commonly known shapes. The head portion 66 of the drilling bit body 60 contains an annular puller groove 70, as well as a rearward facing frusto-conical surface 71.
The drilling bit body 60 further includes a shank portion 72 near the axial rearward end 64 of the drilling bit body 60. The axial length of the shank portion 72 is shown by dimension “B” in FIG. 3. The typical range for dimension “B” is between about 0.9 inches [24 millimeters] and about 3 inches [76 millimeters]. A more preferred range for dimension “B” is between about 1.6 inches [41 millimeters] and about 2.3 inches [58 millimeters]. As shown in
The shank portion 72 includes an axial forward larger diameter portion 73. The shank portion 72 further contains a reduced diameter portion 74 near or adjacent to the axial rearward end 64. In the specific embodiment, the reduced diameter portion 74 is spaced axial forward of the axial rear end 64 of the bit body 60. The reduced diameter portion 74 defines a reduced diameter surface 75. The axial length of the reduced diameter portion 74 is shown by dimension “C” in FIG. 3. The typical range for dimension “C” is between about 0.23 inches [6 millimeters] and about 1.1 inches [28 millimeters]. A more preferred range for dimension “C” is between about 0.23 inches [6 millimeters] and about 0.65 inches [17 millimeters].
The drilling bit 38 further includes a hard insert 76 affixed into the socket 68 at the axial forward end 62 of the drilling bit body 60. Hard insert 76 is typically made of a cemented carbide and is brazed into the socket 68. An exemplary grade of cemented carbide for the hard insert 76 has a composition of about 90.5 weight percent tungsten carbide and 9.5 weight percent cobalt. An exemplary braze alloy to braze the hard insert into the socket is sold under the designations HI-TEMP 080 and HI-TEMP 548 by Handy & Harman, 859 Third Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10022. This braze alloy is a copper-zinc-nickel-manganese-silicon braze alloy. This braze alloy is described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,219,209 to Prizzi et al. that is incorporated by reference herein.
The drilling bit 38 further includes a resilient retainer sleeve 80. Retainer sleeve 80 has opposite ends 82 and 84, as well as an exterior surface 86 and an interior surface 88. The exterior surface 86 is generally smooth. The interior surface 88 is also generally smooth.
The resilient retainer sleeve 80 is carried by the drilling bit body 60 within the reduced diameter portion 74. As will be described hereinafter, when the drilling bit 38 is within the bore 50 of the holder 36, the resilient retainer sleeve 80 is in a fully compressed condition. When the drilling bit 38 is not within the bore 50 of the holder 36, the resilient retainer sleeve 80 is in a fully expanded condition. In the fully expanded condition as shown in
As shown in
Referring to
Referring to
As also shown in
The clearance between the interior surface 88 of the resilient retainer sleeve 80 and the surface 75 of the reduced diameter portion 74 (i.e., dimension “I”) is at least as great as the thickness of the resilient retainer sleeve 80 (i.e., dimension “F”) so as to satisfy the relationship: I≧F. This means that the ratio of the clearance to the thickness of the resilient retainer sleeve is equal to or greater than one. The ratio of the clearance between the interior surface 88 of the resilient retainer sleeve 80 and the surface 75 of the reduced diameter portion 74 (i.e., dimension “I”) and the thickness of the resilient retainer sleeve 80 (i.e., dimension “F”) is between 1.00 and about 3.125. More preferably, the ratio of the clearance between the interior surface 88 of the resilient retainer sleeve 80 and the surface 75 of the reduced diameter portion 74 (i.e., dimension “I”) and the thickness of the resilient retainer sleeve 80 (i.e., dimension “F”) is between 1.00 and about 1.29. The most preferred ratio I/F equals about 1.24.
Further referring to
Referring to
Table I set forth below presents the diameter (i.e., groove diameter) of the reduced diameter portion of the shank and the diameter (i.e., shank diameter) of the forward larger diameter portion of the shank for each one of a number of different styles (Tools 1 through 9) of tools, as well as the ratio of the diameter (i.e., the groove diameter) of the reduced diameter portion of the shank and the diameter (i.e., the shank diameter) of the forward larger diameter portion the shank for each one of these tools.
One exemplary tool is Tool 5 that uses a resilient retainer sleeve that has a thickness of 0.060 inches. What this shows is that the resilient retainer sleeve 80 has a thickness “F” (0.060 inches/1.5 millimeters) that is less than one-half (i.e., about 22.4 percent [0.060/0.268]) of the dimensional difference (0.990−0.722=0.268 inches) between the shank diameter (0.990 inches) and the groove diameter (0.722 inches). In a broader aspect, applicant contemplates that the thickness of the resilient retainer sleeve can be less than or equal to one-half of the dimensional difference between the shank diameter and the groove diameter. In narrower aspects, the resilient retainer sleeve can have a thickness that is between about 0.15 to about 0.40 of the dimensional difference between the shank diameter and the groove diameter. In a still narrower aspect, the resilient retainer sleeve can have a thickness that is between about 0.20 to about 0.30 of the dimensional difference between the shank diameter and the groove diameter. In yet a still narrower aspect, the resilient retainer sleeve can have a thickness that is between about 0.20 to about 0.25 of the dimensional difference between the shank diameter and the groove diameter.
The above Table I shows that there is a range of the ratio of the groove diameter (“H”) to the shank diameter (“K”) for these seven tools. It is shown that the ratio of the groove diameter to the shank diameter ranges between about 0.69 and about 0.80. In a narrower aspect, the ratio of the groove diameter to the shank diameter ranges between about 0.70 and about 0.75.
By providing a resilient retainer sleeve 80 and a drilling bit body 60 that has a reduced diameter portion 74 that have the above mentioned dimensional relationships, applicant has been able to provide a drilling bit assembly that provides sufficient clearance between the interior surface 88 of the resilient retainer sleeve 80 and the surface 75 of the reduced diameter portion 74 so as to reduce the tendency for drilling debris and dirt to become lodged (or collect) in that clearance volume thereby restricting the ability of the resilient retainer sleeve 80 to compress upon the drilling bit being struck on the rear surface.
All patents, patent applications, articles and other documents identified herein are hereby incorporated by reference herein. Other embodiments of the invention may be apparent to those skilled in the art from a consideration of the specification or the practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and any examples set forth herein be considered as illustrative only, with the true spirit and scope of the invention being indicated by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3752515 | Oaks et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3812756 | Wenger | May 1974 | A |
4201421 | Den Besten et al. | May 1980 | A |
4247147 | Rettkowski | Jan 1981 | A |
4327947 | Bower, Jr. | May 1982 | A |
4462638 | Den Besten et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4484783 | Emmerich | Nov 1984 | A |
4489986 | Dziak | Dec 1984 | A |
4497520 | Ojanen | Feb 1985 | A |
4511006 | Grainger | Apr 1985 | A |
4553615 | Grainger | Nov 1985 | A |
4561698 | Beebe | Dec 1985 | A |
4573744 | Clemmow et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4575156 | Hunter et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4582364 | deMey, III | Apr 1986 | A |
4603911 | Hindmarsh et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4650253 | Clemmow et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4660890 | Mills | Apr 1987 | A |
4684176 | Den Besten et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4725099 | Penkunas et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4818027 | Simon | Apr 1989 | A |
4836614 | Ojanen | Jun 1989 | A |
4844550 | Beebe | Jul 1989 | A |
4865392 | Penkunas et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4911503 | Stiffler et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4921310 | Hedlund et al. | May 1990 | A |
4938538 | Larsson et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4940288 | Stiffler et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4941711 | Stiffler | Jul 1990 | A |
RE33494 | Hindmarsh et al. | Dec 1990 | E |
4981328 | Stiffler et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5141289 | Stiffler | Aug 1992 | A |
5161859 | Larsson et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5219209 | Prizzi et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5261499 | Grubb | Nov 1993 | A |
5273343 | Ojanen | Dec 1993 | A |
5303984 | Ojanen | Apr 1994 | A |
5366031 | Rickards | Nov 1994 | A |
5392870 | Clapham et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5400861 | Sheirer | Mar 1995 | A |
5415462 | Massa | May 1995 | A |
5427191 | Rickards | Jun 1995 | A |
5456522 | Beach | Oct 1995 | A |
5503463 | Ojanen | Apr 1996 | A |
5628549 | Ritchey et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632527 | Halder | May 1997 | A |
5645323 | Beach | Jul 1997 | A |
5730502 | Montgomery, Jr. | Mar 1998 | A |
6196636 | Mills et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6354771 | Bauschulte et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6357832 | Sollami | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6375272 | Ojanen | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6478383 | Ojanen et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
20020153175 | Ojanen | Oct 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2837784 | Mar 1980 | DE |
3144060 | May 1983 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040118615 A1 | Jun 2004 | US |