Rotatable blade apparatus with individually adjustable blades

Abstract
The lengths and/or chords and/or pitches of wind turbine or propeller blades are individually established, so that a first blade can have a length/chord/pitch that is different at a given time to the length/chord/pitch of a second blade to optimize performance and/or to equalize stresses on the system.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to rotatable blades for wind turbines, and more particularly to blade assemblies for wind turbines and propellers in which the parameters of chord, length, and pitch can be individually adjusted for each blade.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Variable pitch propellers have been provided in which the pitch of all blades can be simultaneously changed as appropriate to, e.g., reduce cavitation depending on the speed of rotation of the blades. An example of such a system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,733,156, incorporated herein by reference.


In the wind turbine art, U.S. Pat. No. 6,972,498, incorporated herein by reference, provides a wind turbine blade assembly in which the lengths of the blades may be simultaneously changed to account for changing wind speed, imbalances, and control system loads. As understood herein, it would be desirable, for each blade individually, to establish the length and/or chord and/or pitch of the blade.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A wind turbine blade assembly or a propeller blade assembly has at least first and second blades coupled to a rotor defining an axis of rotation. The tip of the first blade is positioned a first distance from the axis of rotation at a first time, while the tip of the second blade is positioned a second distance from the axis of rotation at the first time, with the first and second distances not being equal.


In some implementations, at least one blade has respective plural parts telescoping relative to each other along the length of the blade. Each blade defines a respective length, and the lengths are different from each other at least at the first time. An actuator can telescope one part of a blade relative to another part of the blade. In some aspects plural actuators can be provided to telescope plural parts. The actuator may be supported on the blade and may receive power through a slip ring. Or, the blades can move longitudinally as they ride against a cam surface. The lengths of the blades may be established based on respective pressure signals representative of fluid pressure on the blades, and/or based on respective angular positions of the blades.


In another aspect, a wind turbine blade assembly or a propeller blade assembly has at least fast and second blades coupled to a rotor defining an axis of rotation. The first blade defines a first chord at a first time, the second blade defines a second chord at the first time, and the first and second chords are not equal.


In still another aspect, a wind turbine blade assembly or a propeller blade assembly has at least first and second blades coupled to a rotor defining as axis of rotation. The first blade defines a first pitch at a first time, the second blade defines a second pitch at the first time, and the first and second pitches are not equal.


In another aspect, a method for operating a wind turbine includes establishing a first value for a first parameter of a first blade at a first time, and establishing a second value for the first parameter of a second blade at the first time. According to this aspect, when the blades are disposed in wind, they rotate to cause the wind turbine to produce electrical power.


In another aspect, a wind turbine has as upright support, a rotor coupled to the support, and at least first and second blades coupled to the rotor to cause it to rotate when wind passes the blades. Bach blade has first and second configurations. The first configuration of the first blade is identical to the first configuration of the second blade and the second configuration of the first blade is identical to the second configuration of the second blade. As set forth further below, the first blade assumes the first configuration at a first time and the second blade assumes the second configuration at the first time.


The details of the present invention, both as to its stricture and operation, can best be understood in reference to the accompanying drawings, is which like reference numerals refer to like parts, and in which:





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a wind turbine in accordance with present principles;



FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a vessel propeller in accordance with present principles;



FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing control elements in accordance with one embodiment;



FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing control elements in accordance with another embodiment;



FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a blade in the extended configuration;



FIG. 6 is a plan view of a blade, showing one preferred non-limiting pressure sensor disposition on the blade;


FIG. is a block diagram of one actuator embodiment, in which a single motor moves plural blade segments;



FIG. 8 is a block diagram of one actuator embodiment, in which respective motors move respective blade segments;



FIG. 9 is a perspective view of a non-limiting actuator;



FIG. 10 is an elevational view of as alternative cam-based system; and



FIG. 11 is a plan view showing that the present principles, in addition to being applied to change the length of a blade, may also be applied in changing the chord and/or pitch of the blade.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Referring initially to FIG. 1, a wind turbine blade assembly is shown, generally designated 10, which includes first and second blades 12, 14 that are coupled to a rotor 16, it being understood that present principles apply to two, three, or more blades. The rotor 16 is rotatably supported above the surface 18 of the earth by an upright support 20, which holds the blades 12, 14 in a vertical plane above the earth's surface as shown. In accordance with principles known in the art, wind flowing past the blades causes them to turn to thereby cause an associated generator, shown schematically at 21, to generate electric power.


The rotor 16 defines an axis 22 of rotation, and in accordance with disclosure below at least the first blade 12 and preferably both blades 12, 14 can be moved between a long configuration and a short configuration, as well as to intermediate configurations therebetween, and the blade 12 is not constrained to be in the same configuration as the second blade 14. Thus, to illustrate, FIG. 1 shows that the blade 12 has a blade tip 24 that can be configured to be a relatively long distance d1 from the axis 22 of rotation. Simultaneously, the tip 26 of the second blade 14 can be configured to be a second distance d2 from the axis 22 of rotation, with the distances d1, d2 being unequal when present principles are applied. For purposes that will shortly become clear, one or more pressure sensors 28 can be disposed on one or both blades 12, 14. Alternatively, wind speed sensors on the blades 12, 14 or elsewhere can be used.


As set forth further below, the principles outlined herein in terms of variable length also apply to variable pitches and chords, so that in addition to or in lieu of different lengths, the pitches and/or chords of the respective blades 12, 14 may be different from each other at the same point in time. It is to be farther understood that the assembly 10 may also, at other times, embody conventional operating principles wherein the blades 12, 14 are identically configured in length, chord, and pitch.



FIG. 2 shows that the present principles can also be applied to a propeller blade assembly 30 that has at least first and second blades 32, 34, and potentially additional blades 36, coupled to a rotatable rotor 38 that defines an axis 40 of rotation. The tip 42 of the first blade 32 can be configured to be a first distance from the axis 40 of rotation and simultaneously the tip 44 of the second blade 34 can be configured to be a further distance from the axis 40 of rotation than is the tip 42 of the first blade 32. A shaft 46 of a waterborne vessel 48 can hold the blades 32, 34, 36 in a vertical plane (at neutral vessel pitch) as shown.


As set forth further below, the principles outlined herein in terms of variable length also apply to variable pitches and chords, so that in addition to or in lieu of different lengths, the pitches and/or chords of the respective blades 32, 34, 36 may be different from each other at the same point in time. It is to be further understood that the assembly 30 may also, at other times, embody conventional operating principles wherein the blades are identically configured in length, chord, and pitch.


For illustration purposes the disclosure below focuses on a wind turbine application, it being understood that the principles embodied therein may be applied to the propeller assembly 30, in which, e.g., the blade 34 has plural portions 50 that can telescope or otherwise move in the axial dimension of the blade 34 relative to each other (and, as stated above, potentially can also move relative to each other in the chord dimension).



FIGS. 3 and 4 show various system configurations for controlling the lengths (and/or chords and/or pitches) of the blade 12, and preferably also of the blade 14. A controller or processor 52 can receive input from the pressure sensors 28 on the blades and/or from an encoder 54 that outputs a signal representing the angular position of the rotor 16. The controller or processor 52 controls an actuator with motor 56 to establish the length (and/or chord and/or pitch) of the blades. The motor may be a stepper motor or other appropriate motor, and as set forth further below may be located within the blade 12 or outside the blade 12. From time to time herein, “actuator” may be used to refer to both a motor and the linkages tot couple the motor to the movable blade portions, and to just the linkages themselves.


In some implementations, the length of each blade 12, 14 is established based on its angular position. Thus, in some-limiting embodiments a blade can assume the long configuration when at the top dead center position (pointing straight up vertically from the rotor) and the short configuration in the opposite position, and can have intermediate lengths when moving therebetween. In terms of the two blade application of FIG. 1, the first blade 12 is in the long configuration at the same time the second blade 14 is in the short configuration.


In addition to or in lien of using angular position to establish the lengths of the blades, the lengths of the blades can depend on respective pressure signals from the sensors 28, which are representative of fluid pressure on the blades. In this embodiment, the controller or processor 52 establishes blade length both to optimize performance while minimizing load imbalances on the rotor by, e.g., establishing blade lengths that result in equal pressures on both blades 12, 14 while providing optimum length based on wind speed, to ensure that the blades rotate as fast as feasible while remaining below angular velocity limits.



FIG. 4 shows further details of the controls of one illustrative non-limiting embodiment. As shows, the pressure sensors 28 on the blade 12 are electrically connected to a sensor bus 58 within the blade. The bus 58 is connected to the controller or processor 52 through a slip ring connector array 60, which, in accordance with slip ring principles known in the art, permits relative rotational movement between the blade 12 and the controller 52 while maintaining electrical connectivity between them. A bidirectional data bus 59 can be provided between the slip ring connector array 60 and the controller 52 to permit the controller 52 to receive pressure signals and to output control signals to the actuators discussed below.


More particularly, electrical power, as well as control signals from the controller 52, is also provided through the slip ring to one or more actuator subsystems 62, each of which can include a respective motor and a respective linkage that connects the actuator to a respective blade portion to move the blade portion. Alternatively, a single motor may be provided within the blade 12 and linked through gears or other linkages as set forth further below to move each of plural individual actuator subsystems that, is such a circumstance, would include only linkages to respective blade portions.



FIGS. 5-8 show further details of non-limiting implementations of the present blade. As shown in FIG. 5 and using the first blade 12 as an example, the blade can have plural portions 64 that move relative to each other in the length dimension of the blade, it being understood that similar principles apply to expand and contract the blade in the chord dimension. As shown at 66, an actuator linkage can be coupled to two adjacent substantially rigid hollow blade portions 64 to move the blade portions relative to each other. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 5, the blade portions abut each other along their transverse edges in the short configuration, with facing transverse edges of adjacent blade portions being distanced from each other in the long configuration and, if desired, a flexible membrane 68 (portions of which are removed in FIG. 5 to show the linkage 66) can enclose the space between the portions.



FIG. 6 shows that the pressure sensors 28 can be arranged in two lines along the length of the blade 12, with one line of sensors being disposed on a first side of the “twist” 70, or blade surface aspect change line, and with a second line of sensors being disposed, on the opposite side of the twist as shown.



FIG. 7 shows that in some implementations, a single motor 72 can be provided in the blade 12 to turn a lead screw 74 or equivalent structure, with plural nuts 76 or equivalent linking structure riding on the lead screw 74 and connected to respective blade portions to move the blade portions.


In contrast, FIG. 8 shows that each of plural movable blade portions 80, 82 can house its own respective motor and linkage that connects the blade portion to the distally successive blade portion. Thus, the blade portion 80 has a motor 84 with linkage 86 that extends between the blade portions 80, 82 to move the medial blade portion 82 outward from the proximal blade portion 80. Likewise, the medial blade portion 82 supports a motor 88 with associated linkage 90 extending to a distal blade portion 92, to move the distal blade portion 92 outward from the medial blade portion 82. Additional blade portions with motors and linkages may be provided. As mentioned earlier, power can be supplied to the motors through a power line 94 and slip ring assembly 96, and data and control signals can be exchanged through the slip ring assembly 96 and data bus 98 within the blade 12.


As also shown in FIG. 8, instead of using a flexible membrane 68 (FIG. 5) between adjacent blade portions, each adjacent blade portion can, in the short configuration, be partially nested within the immediately proximal portion. Accordingly, in the short configuration the sub-portion 100 (with parts broken away in FIG. 8 to expose the linkage 86) of the medial blade portion 82 is nested within the proximal blade portion 80, whereas in the long configuration shown the sub-portion 100 is telescoped distally beyond the proximal portion 80. All portions of the blade in this embodiment can be substantially rigid. Similarly, a sub-portion 102 (part of which is removed in FIG. 8 to expose the linkage 90) of the distal blade portion 92 is nested within the medial portion 82 in the short configuration and is telescoped distally beyond the medial portion 82 in the long configuration.



FIG. 9 shows an illustrative non-limiting example of one of the motor actuators shown in FIG. 8. A motor 104 such as DC motor is affixed to one blade portion (not shown) to turn a pinion gear 106, which translates rotational motion to longitudinal (with respect to the blade) translational movement of a rack 108. The rack 108 is affixed to the successive blade portion 110, to move it toward and away the blade portion that supports the motor 104.


When the length of the blade is sought to be changed only based on angular position, FIG. 10 shows that instead of using motor actuators, each blade 110, 112 of a wind turbine or propeller can have proximal and distal portions 114, 116 that telescope relative to each other as the blade, which is attached to a rotor 117, rotates past a cam 118 on which a part of the blade between the portions 114, 116 ride. The contour of the surface of the cam is established to establish the desired length-to-angular position relationship. Other mechanisms, including gearing, can be employed.


Other mechanisms for moving a blade are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,972,498, modified as appropriate to permit the individual establishment of the length of each blade, independently of other blades, as described above.



FIG. 11 schematically illustrates that individual blade configuration may be independently established not just in the length dimension by length adjustment actuators 120 but alternatively or additionally in the chord dimension by chord adjustment actuators 122 and/or in the pitch dimension by a pitch adjustment actuator 124, which rotates the blade about its hub using, as non-limiting examples, the mechanisms described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,733,156. In any case, it is to be appreciated that the length and/or chord and/or pitch of each blade of the present wind turbine or propeller can be established independently of the length and/or chord and/or pitch of one or more other blades as necessary to equalize fluid pressure on the blades, to optimize performance by, e.g., attaining an optimum speed of rotation, and in the case of propellers to lower the rudder profile as necessary to avoid cavitation or even to assist in turning the vessel.


While the particular ROTATABLE BLADE APPARATUS WITH INDIVIDUALLY ADJUSTABLE BLADES is herein shown and described in detail, it is to be understood that the subject matter which is encompassed by the present invention is limited only by the claims. For instance, the principles described herein could be applied to airplane propellers and to helicopter rotor blades.

Claims
  • 1. A wind turbine blade assembly comprising: at least first and second blades coupled to a rotor, the first blade defining a first pitch at a first time, the second blade defining a second pitch at the first time, at least one of the pitches being established by a pressure signal from at least one pressure sensor disposed on at least one blade to provide the pressure signal;at least one controller receiving input from the pressure sensor;at least one actuator comprising at least one motor coupled to at least the first blade and controlled by the at least one controller responsive to input from the pressure sensor to change a pitch of the first blade.
  • 2. The assembly of claim 1, wherein the pitches are based on respective positions of the blades relative to an axis of rotation.
  • 3. The assembly of claim 1, comprising an actuator coupled to at least one blade to establish the pitch of the blade.
  • 4. The wind turbine blade assembly of claim 1, comprising a respective pressure sensor on each blade.
  • 5. A wind turbine blade assembly comprising: at least first and second blades, the first blade defining a first pitch at a first time, the second blade defining a second pitch at the first time, at least one pitch being established by a pressure signal from at least one pressure sensor on at least one blade;at least one sensor bus receiving the pressure signal;at least one controller communicating with the sensor bus to receive the pressure signal and control at least one actuator to control the at least one pitch at least partially based thereon;at least one slip ring assembly establishing electrical connection between the at least one pressure sensor and the sensor bus; andat least one bidirectional data bus between the slip ring assembly and the controller to permit the controller to output control signals to the actuator, electrical power also being provided through the slip ring assembly to the actuator.
  • 6. The wind turbine blade assembly of claim 5, comprising a respective pressure sensor on each blade.
  • 7. The wind turbine blade assembly of claim 5, wherein the at least one pitch is based on respective positions of the blades relative to an axis of rotation.
  • 8. A turbine blade assembly comprising: at least first and second blades coupled to a rotor, the first blade defining a first pitch at a first time, the second blade defining a second pitch at the first time, the first and second pitches not being equal, wherein the pitches are established independently of each other based on respective pressure signals from at least respective first and second pressure sensors on respectively on the first and second blades;at least one controller to receive the pressure signals and control at least one actuator to control the first and second pitches based on the respective pressure signals from the respective first and second pressure sensors such that the pitches are controlled independently of each other.
  • 9. The turbine blade assembly of claim 8, comprising a respective pressure sensor on each blade.
  • 10. The turbine blade assembly of claim 8, wherein the pitches are based on respective positions of the blades relative to an axis of rotation.
US Referenced Citations (134)
Number Name Date Kind
1540583 Schlotzhauer et al. Jun 1925 A
2704128 Papadakos Mar 1955 A
3249160 Messerschmitt May 1966 A
3934533 Wainwright Jan 1976 A
3996877 Schneekluth Dec 1976 A
4007407 Kranert Feb 1977 A
4057960 Werner Nov 1977 A
4109477 Vogel Aug 1978 A
4138901 Fortin et al. Feb 1979 A
4141309 Halboth Feb 1979 A
4202762 Fontein et al. May 1980 A
4260329 Bjorknas Apr 1981 A
4285637 Thompson Aug 1981 A
4293280 Yim Oct 1981 A
4311472 Hiersig et al. Jan 1982 A
4365937 Hiebert et al. Dec 1982 A
4371350 Kruppa et al. Feb 1983 A
4387866 Eickmann Jun 1983 A
4427341 Eichler Jan 1984 A
4463555 Wilcoxson Aug 1984 A
4490093 Chertok et al. Dec 1984 A
4503673 Schachle et al. Mar 1985 A
4504029 Erickmann Mar 1985 A
4540341 Wuhrer Sep 1985 A
4563581 Perten Jan 1986 A
4563940 Wuhrer Jan 1986 A
4565531 Kimon Jan 1986 A
4611774 Brand Sep 1986 A
4618313 Mosiewicz Oct 1986 A
4626170 Dorsch Dec 1986 A
4627791 Marshall Dec 1986 A
4632637 Traudt Dec 1986 A
4648788 Jochum Mar 1987 A
4648847 Mueller Mar 1987 A
4687162 Johnson et al. Aug 1987 A
4743335 Krappitz et al. May 1988 A
4770371 Eickmann Sep 1988 A
4784351 Eickmann Nov 1988 A
4792279 Bergeron Dec 1988 A
4801243 Norton Jan 1989 A
4856732 Eickmann Aug 1989 A
4880402 Muller Nov 1989 A
4891025 Brandt Jan 1990 A
4893989 Carvalho Jan 1990 A
4899641 Khan Feb 1990 A
4900226 Vries Feb 1990 A
4919630 Erdberg Apr 1990 A
4925131 Eickmann May 1990 A
4929201 Pitt May 1990 A
4964822 Mueller Oct 1990 A
4973225 Kruppa Nov 1990 A
4982914 Eickmann Jan 1991 A
4988303 Thomas Jan 1991 A
4993919 Schneider Feb 1991 A
5017089 Schneider et al. May 1991 A
5028210 Peterson et al. Jul 1991 A
5286166 Steward Feb 1994 A
5449129 Carlile et al. Sep 1995 A
5466177 Aihara et al. Nov 1995 A
5479869 Coudon et al. Jan 1996 A
5531407 Austin et al. Jul 1996 A
5554003 Hall Sep 1996 A
5557362 Ueda Sep 1996 A
5562413 Aihara et al. Oct 1996 A
5733156 Aihara et al. Mar 1998 A
5791954 Johnson Aug 1998 A
5836743 Carvalho et al. Nov 1998 A
5841652 Sanchez Nov 1998 A
5859517 DePasqua Jan 1999 A
5927656 Hinkleman Jul 1999 A
5997253 Feehan Dec 1999 A
5997991 Kato et al. Dec 1999 A
6015117 Broadbent Jan 2000 A
6019649 Friesen et al. Feb 2000 A
6032899 Mondet et al. Mar 2000 A
6045096 Rinn et al. Apr 2000 A
6123297 Berry Sep 2000 A
6196801 Muhlbauer Mar 2001 B1
6231005 Costes May 2001 B1
6260793 Balayn et al. Jul 2001 B1
6312223 Samuelsson Nov 2001 B1
6358007 Castle Mar 2002 B1
6361275 Wobben Mar 2002 B1
6374519 Beaumont Apr 2002 B1
6379115 Hirai Apr 2002 B1
6413133 McCarthy Jul 2002 B1
6431499 Roche et al. Aug 2002 B1
6441507 Deering et al. Aug 2002 B1
6443286 Bratel et al. Sep 2002 B1
6443701 Muhlbauer Sep 2002 B1
6454619 Funami et al. Sep 2002 B1
6637202 Koch et al. Oct 2003 B2
6665631 Steinbrecher Dec 2003 B2
6666312 Matranga et al. Dec 2003 B2
6666649 Arnold Dec 2003 B2
6682378 Day Jan 2004 B1
6688924 Marsland et al. Feb 2004 B2
6752595 Murakami Jun 2004 B2
6853094 Feddersen et al. Feb 2005 B2
6855016 Jansen Feb 2005 B1
6875337 Schroeder et al. Apr 2005 B1
6902370 Dawson et al. Jun 2005 B2
6902451 Theisen Jun 2005 B1
6938418 Koch et al. Sep 2005 B2
6940185 Andersen et al. Sep 2005 B2
6957991 Gibbs Oct 2005 B2
6972498 Jamieson et al. Dec 2005 B2
7021978 Jansen Apr 2006 B2
7025567 Wobben Apr 2006 B2
7030341 Maurer Apr 2006 B2
7256509 Brandt Aug 2007 B2
7293959 Pedersen et al. Nov 2007 B2
7393180 Mutius Jul 2008 B2
7445431 Larsen Nov 2008 B2
7452185 Ide et al. Nov 2008 B2
7488155 Barbu Feb 2009 B2
7513742 Rogall et al. Apr 2009 B2
7530785 Deering et al. May 2009 B1
7560824 Hehenberger Jul 2009 B2
7891946 Mollhagen Feb 2011 B2
7942634 Christensen May 2011 B2
8608441 Hotto Dec 2013 B2
9297264 Hotto Mar 2016 B2
20020150473 Castle Oct 2002 A1
20030153215 Gibbs Aug 2003 A1
20030230898 Jamieson et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040185725 Wilkie Sep 2004 A1
20040201220 Andersen et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050204930 Maurer Sep 2005 A1
20050214126 Lobrovich Sep 2005 A1
20050287885 Mizuguchi et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060079140 Muller Apr 2006 A1
20110229300 Kanev et al. Sep 2011 A1
20140044547 Hotto Feb 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
0995904 Apr 2000 EP
2005005824 Jan 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (12)
Entry
Alan D. Wright, “National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Technical Report: Modern Control Design for Flexible Wind Turbines” NREL/TP-500-35816, Jul. 2004.
David Lawrence Lemieux, “Rotor Blade Fatigue Reduction on Wind Turbine Using Pitch Control, a Thesis submitted to the Department of General Engineering Montana Tech of the University of Montana for the degree of Master of Science in General Engineering”, May 2001.
E.A. Bossanyi, “Individual Blade Pitch Control for Load Reduction”, Wind Energy, 6:119-128, 2003 (published online Oct. 8, 2002).
E.A. Bossanyi, Garrad Hassan & Partners Ltd., “Further Load Reduction with Individual Pitch Control”, Wind Energy vol. 8, issue 4, pp. 481-485, published online Jul. 7, 2005.
J.L. Tangler, D.M. Somers, “NREL Airfoil Families for HAWTs”, updated AWEA, Jan. 1995.
Morten H. Hansen, Anca Hansen, Torben J. Larsen, “Riso-Report: Control Design for a Pitch-Regulated, Variable Speed Wind Turbine”, Riso National Laboratory, Denmark, Jan. 2005.
P. Caselitz, W. Kleingauf, T. Kruger, J. Petschenka, M. Reichardt, K. Storzel, “Reduction of Fatigue Loads on Wind Engery Converters by Advanced Control Methods”, European Wind Energy Conference, Oct. 1997.
Ryan T. Cowgill, Jake Fouts, Byron Haley, Chris Whitham, “Wind Turbine Roto Design Final Design Report”, Boise State University College of Engineering, 2006.
Torben Juul Larsen, Helge A. Madsen, Kenneth Thomsen, “Active Load Reduction Using Individual Pitch, Based on Local Blade Flow Mesasurements, ” Wind Energy, 8:67-80, 2005 (Accepted Sep. 13, 2004).
Torbjorn Thiringer, Andreas Petersson, “Control of a Variable-Speed Pitch-Regulated Wind Turbine”, Division of Electric Power Engineering Department of Energy and Environment Chalmers University of Technology, 2005.
Voith Turbo, Voith Schneider® Propeller Designer Manual, Jul. 2005 3500 MSW/WA Printed in Germany, pp. 1-12.
W.P. Engels, S.K. Kanev, T.G. Van Engelen, “Distributed Blade Control”, Presented at Torque 2010 “The Science of making Torque from Wind”, Heraklion, Greece, Oct. 2010.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160169198 A1 Jun 2016 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 14050532 Oct 2013 US
Child 15049298 US
Parent 11451536 Jun 2006 US
Child 14050532 US