1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to rotatable cutting tool assemblies and more specifically to rotatable cutting tool assemblies having sleeve retainers for removable attachment of the cutting tool within a bored tool holder.
2. Description of the Related Art
The present invention is directed toward a cutting tool assembly employed in earth working, mining or construction applications wherein a cutting bit is held on a mounting block or bit holder that is affixed to a movable member. Such cutting tool assemblies have been employed for various excavating operations. These excavating operations can include removal of minerals as well as trenching, concrete cutting, road planing and other construction applications. The effective life expectancy of cutting tools is determined by the cutting tool's ability to be securely held in place and yet be free to rotate in order to promote uniform wear on the respective tip portions. While earlier cutting tool assemblies have performed satisfactorily, certain problems or drawbacks have existed, and the subject invention is directed toward overcoming these problems.
There is a need in the art for a cutting tool assembly wherein the cutting bit will be adequately retained within the mounting block for an extended lifetime without inadvertent removal of the cutting bit due to the forces acting thereon during excavating operations.
Prior art cutting tool assemblies have employed cylindrical retainer sleeve clips with cutting tool shanks that have an annular groove closer to the rear portion of the shank for receiving stop tabs that axially fix replaceable cutting tools inside the bore of a bit holder. In U.S. Pat. No. 5,503,463 to Ojanen, a cylindrical retainer has inward stop fingers that are received by the annular groove on the shank and outwardly directed fingers that are received in an annular groove in the bit holder bore sidewall.
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,921,310 to Hedlund and U.S. Pat. No. 4,684,176 to Den Besten prior art designs, the fingers are formed by shear cuts made in the retainer and deflecting the finger stops radially inward.
The fracture of the retainer in the field causes difficulty in removing the retainer from the bit holder. When an operator attempts to remove the retainer for replacement, it occasionally breaks off and additional time and tools are needed to remove the portion of the retainer remaining in the bit holder. In the prior art the cutting tool and a portion of the retainer are dislodged during operation when a reverse load is applied to the cutting tool.
Fractured retainers make used tools difficult to remove or the retainer sticks in the bore and the tool shank is ejected without the retainer. The retainer must then be driven out separately. This creates production delays in changing the tool. A fractured retainer typically takes 5 minutes to change whereas an undamaged retainer can be removed in about 30 seconds. It isn't unusual that it may take 30 minutes to remove a fractured retainer from a support block. A typical change of the set of tools on a have lane construction machine normally takes about 30 minutes. If 2-3 retainers are fractured it can take from anywhere between 15-90 minutes more time. This additional downtime needed to remove fractured retainers increases required labor costs.
Retainer fracture and failure in the prior art is often attributed to relative axial movement between the retainer and cutting tool shank. In U.S. Pat. No. 4,921,310 to Hedlund, retainer stop tabs 12 are received in an annular groove on the cutting tool shank. The amount of axial play of the cutting tool in prior art devices such as the embodiment in FIG. 6 of Hedlund increases during the lifetime of the tool on account of wear occurring to the stop fingers.
The premature wear and fracture of cylindrical retainers on cutting tool assemblies requires the cutting tool assemblies to be more frequently replaced and/or inspected. When the retainer is worn or fractured the shank of the tool oftentimes becomes locked up and stops rotating. Once the tool stops rotating the cutting tool bit becomes unevenly worn on one side and the cutting bit quickly becomes damaged and inoperative. Some cutting bits are knocked out and become lost after the retainer is fractured or worn. Other bits become locked within the bit holder as the worn retainer pieces wedge the shank within the bit holder. Such bit holders on rotary drums must be removed and attached back onto the drum.
The subject invention overcomes the problems in the prior art in a cutting tool assembly having a retainer scheme which effectively and rotatably retains the cutting bit within the mounting block while at the same time preventing premature failure of the cutting bit retainer during excavating operations.
The subject invention is directed toward a cutting tool assembly including a cutting bit having a head and a cylindrical shank portion of substantially constant diameter depending from the head and a bit holder including a cylindrical bore for receiving the cylindrical shank portion of the cutting bit. The shank portion includes an annular recessed groove. The cutting tool assembly also includes a retainer sleeve disposed between the shank portion of the cutting bit and the bore of the bit holder. The retainer closely conforms about the circumference of the shank portion while allowing the shank portion to rotate within the bore. The retainer includes at least one inwardly projecting folded over stop tab contacting an axially outward facing surface formed by a groove on the shank of a cutting tool.
An object of the invention is to prevent fracture/crack propagation adjacent the shear cut lines of the stop tab openings on a retainer. The applicant's invention positions the shank so that the shank hub contacts the retainer axially rearward and away from the weak shear cut lines of the retainer from which cracks propagate in the prior art. The retainer of applicant's invention includes stop tab tips beyond the shear cut lines of the tab opening so that the hub portions of the shank do not transmit a force against these weakened shear cut edges of the stop tab openings.
Another feature of the invention is the shear cut lines of the stop tab openings are rounded to prevent stress concentration of loads as occur in sharp angled corner openings.
The invention cutting tool's axial play when the cutting tool is in the bit holder is limited by the cooperation of the stop tab and shank groove. The outward most position of the cutting tool is limited by the contact between the tip of the stop tab and an annular outward facing surface of a shank groove and the most inward position of the cutting tool is limited by the contact of the other opposite inward facing surface of the groove and bendtop of the folded over end portion of the tab.
In another embodiment of the invention the cutting tool's outward axial play is confined by the tip of the folded over stop tab contacting the outwardly facing annular edge surface of the shank groove and inward axial movement of the cutting bit is limited by cooperation of the outward endface of the cylindrical retainer and an annular surface of the neck of the cutting bit shank as in the prior art. However in this second embodiment of the invention the bendtop of the folded over portion of the stop tab is initially designed to be adjacent but not abutting the other opposite face of the groove; however, as the shank and retainer begin to wear during use and the tool begins to develop more axial freedom/play, the other opposite surface of the groove abuts the folded over end portion of the tab.
Another alternative embodiment has a shank portion that includes an annular recessed groove, and the cylindrical bore has a notch corresponding to and disposed opposite the annular groove. The retainer has stop tabs that are received in the groove and dimples that are received in the bore notch. This invention improves attachment of the cutting bit within the bore of the bit holder and prevents axial removal of the cutting bit when in use while still allowing rotatable movement of the cutting bit within the bore.
In this way, the cutting bit of the cutting tool of the subject invention may be rotatably retained within the bit holder, while, at the same time, successfully resisting axial removal during excavating operations. In mining machines such as continuous miners, road working machines like road planers, and earth moving machines such as mechanized shovels, a plurality of cutting bits are mounted on these apparatus for cutting earth strata or man made surfaces such as asphalt.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will be readily appreciated as the same becomes better understood after reading the subsequent description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings:
Referring now to the drawings and specifically to
The head 14 includes a body 22 and a cutting element 24 disposed on one side of the body 22 and at the distal end of the cutting head 14. The head 14 also includes an annular shoulder 26 disposed on the other end of the body 22 opposite the cutting element 24. A washer 25 is positioned between the shoulder 26 and a front face 19 of the bit holder. The annular shoulder 26 has a diameter larger than the outside diameter of the washer 25. The washer is adapted for abutting contact with the front face 19 of the bit holder 18. The shoulder 26 is adapted for abutting contact with the other face of the washer.
The washer has an outside diameter larger than the diameter of a flared mouth of the bit holder bore 20. The smaller diameter washer permits access of a removal tool between the front face of the bit holder and cutting tool shoulder so that the cutting tool can be pried off the bit holder with the removal tool. A cylindrical neck portion 30 merges between the annular shoulder 26 and the shank portion 16 of the cutting bit 12.
The flared mouth 32 as best seen in
The bottom end of the retainer 51 is chamfered between about 30-45 degrees with respect to the central axis of the retainer. This chamfer provides for additional ease in the reception of the retainer into bit holder bores.
The shank portion 16 includes an annularly recessed groove 34. The annularly recessed groove 34 as shown in
The cutting tool assembly 10 further includes a retainer sleeve, generally indicated at 40 in
The tips 43 of stop tabs as seen in
During the lifetime of the cutting tool assembly the stop tab tip 43 wears as the tool shank rotates and loads are applied to the cutting tool assembly. As the stop tab tip material wears down, the outwardmost axial position of the cutting bit increases along with the overall axial play of the cutting bit. That is, as the stop tab tip 43 wears down, the shank hub's outward facing groove surface 23 is able to move a greater distance axially outward of the bit holder, and ever closer to the shear line of the rounded tip portion 47. The distance “D” that the tip 43 extends beyond the opening shear cut line is adequately designed to account for mechanical wear of the tip end 43 during the lifetime of the tool. The distance “D” is selected to be greater than the amount of axial wear that normally results on the stop tab tip during the lifetime of the cutting tool assembly.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,484,783 to Emmerich, and U.S. Pat. No. 3,519,309 to Engle et al, disclose retainers having radially protruding surfaces (dimples, bulge) that cooperate with a notch of the bit holder bore. These protruding surfaces of the retainer are spring loaded so as to expand into the bore notch whenever the cutting tool/retainer assembly is inserted into the bore. These type prior art designs often became difficult to remove from bit holders after continued usage on cutting equipment. When these type prior art designs are used on mining and construction equipment, dirt and cutting debris would penetrate the clearances between the shank, retainer and bit holder bore and accumulate in the shanks annular groove. This debris and dirt interferes with the inward radial play of the radially protruding surfaces, making the tools very difficult and sometimes impossible to remove.
The invention includes protruding dimples that are designed to require no radial play and, therefore, do not suffer from the same drawback as the prior art. The retainer sleeve 40 also includes at least one, but preferably a plurality of, outwardly directed dimples 46 which project in a direction opposite the inwardly bent over stop tabs 44. The dimples are generally positioned within the same radial plane about the circumference of the sleeve. The dimples project a distance of between about 0.007-0.020 inches beyond the exterior cylindrical surface of the retainer. The raised dimple of one embodiment protruding from the exterior surface has a diameter of between 0.06-0.10 inches. The outwardly directed dimples 46 are generally uniformly spaced relative to one another about the circumference of the retainer sleeve 40 and extend into the notch 38 at approximately equally spaced intervals. The retainer sleeve 40 includes a plurality of stop tab openings 48. Each of the dimples 46 are positioned centrally between a pair of stop tab openings 48. The openings 48 each define a general D-shaped aperture. The D-shaped opening has no sharp corners or edges. Every corner of the opening is rounded 47/49 to reduce any stress concentration of mechanical forces applied to the retainer during rotating and loading of the cutting tool. The inwardly directed stop tabs 44 and outward dimples 46 of the retainer sleeve 40 co-act with the recessed groove 34 and annular notch 38 to retain the cutting bit 12 within the bore 20 of the bit holder 18 and to prevent axial removal of the cutting bit during normal use while at the same time the stop tabs 44 permit rotatable movement of the cutting bit within the bore 20. In order for the cutting bit to be removed from the bit holder, enough force must be applied to the retainer dimples 46 for them to overcome the sharp 90-degree corner of the notch 38. The cutting bit assembly of
The flared mouth section 32 of the bore 20 provides for a smooth reception of the dimples about the circumference of the retainer of the cutting tool during installation of the cutting tool into the bit holder. The cooperation of the dimples with a notch improves the strength of the connection between the retainer and bit holder. The new dimpled retainer 40, when used in cooperation with a notched bore, increases the retention of the cutting bit to approximately 2.5x-4x of comparable retainers without dimples, such as Den Bensten U.S. Pat. No. 4,201,421. The dimples apply an improved holding power over the split ring band as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,519,309 to Engle. The dimples serve to prevent the cutting tool from being accidentally disengaged from the support block 18 as a result of vibration, impact, or reverse loading of the excavation cutting tool holder assembly 10. Such reverse loading may occur, for example, if the cutting tool assemblies 10 are used in conjunction with a drum and the machine carrying the drum is backed up without the drum rotating.
In prior art road planing construction equipment, cutting bits typically have a smooth retainer exterior surface (without dimples). These type prior art retainers are often ejected from the cutting drum portion that are not engaging the road during operation. The cutting bits on the drum that are not engaged in the cutting action and are positioned off the road in a gravel or dirt shoulder of the road, for instance, have a much greater propensity for being ejected from their bit holders. The present
The relative cooperation between the shank neck 30, shank groove 34 and retainer 40 determines the axial play of the cutting tool assembly shown in
In the
In a second alternative embodiment of the cutting tool assembly, the entire dimension shapes and geometries of the elements are identical to the embodiment illustrated in
The notched bit holder shown in
The present folded over stop tab spring retainer design can be alternatively designed without dimples as well-known in the prior art. The ability of the smooth retainer to secure the cutting bit within the bit holder is far less than the dimpled retainer embodiment illustrated in
The retainer sleeve 40 is made of resilient spring steel such as spring steel 1050 between 0.033-0.066 inches. In one embodiment design, the thickness of the sheet steel used to make the retainer is 0.045 inches. In one design of the retainer, the steel grain is oriented to be parallel to the central axis of the retainer to help reduce perpendicular and horizontal fractures as shown at 7 in
The cutting bits of the cutting tool assemblies of the subject invention may be rotatably retained within the bit holders, while, at the same time, successfully resisting axial removal during excavating operations. The inventions disclosed provide for reduced axial play and prevent contact between the shank hub and retainer shear cut lines reducing both wear and fractures to the retainer, improving the life expectancy of the retainer with respect to the prior art. The improved dimple design improves attachment of the retainer within the bit holder while at the same time permitting the dimpled retainer to be easily installed into the bit holder. In addition, these objectives are met in a cost effective, efficient manner which does not jeopardize tool life nor overly complicate the assembly and disassembly of the cutting tool.
The disclosed embodiments improve the effective life expectancy of the retainers and reduce the amount of maintenance required on mining and construction cutting equipment.
The subject invention has been described in an illustrative manner. It is to be understood that the terminology which has been used is intended to be in the nature of words of description rather than of limitation. Many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. Therefore, within the scope of the appended claims, the present invention may be practiced other than as specifically described.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3397012 | Krekeler | Aug 1968 | A |
3405831 | Hudson | Oct 1968 | A |
3512838 | Kniff | May 1970 | A |
3519309 | Engle et al. | Jul 1970 | A |
3752515 | Oaks et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3801158 | Radd et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3841708 | Kniff et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
RE29900 | Kniff | Feb 1979 | E |
4201421 | Den Besten et al. | May 1980 | A |
4247147 | Rettkowski | Jan 1981 | A |
4327947 | Bower, Jr. | May 1982 | A |
4484783 | Emmerich | Nov 1984 | A |
4485655 | Ewing | Dec 1984 | A |
4489986 | Dziak | Dec 1984 | A |
4538339 | Ewing | Sep 1985 | A |
4575156 | Hunter et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4582364 | deMey, III | Apr 1986 | A |
4684176 | Den Besten et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4728153 | Ojanen et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4836614 | Ojanen | Jun 1989 | A |
4850649 | Beach et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4921310 | Hedlund et al. | May 1990 | A |
5067775 | D'Angelo | Nov 1991 | A |
5181867 | Rodondi et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5503463 | Ojanen | Apr 1996 | A |
5536073 | Sulosky et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5628549 | Ritchey et al. | May 1997 | A |
5645323 | Beach | Jul 1997 | A |
5730502 | Montgomery, Jr. | Mar 1998 | A |
5807049 | Beck et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5861572 | Schuermann | Jan 1999 | A |
5931542 | Britzke et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6000153 | Sollami | Dec 1999 | A |
6164728 | Sollami | Dec 2000 | A |
6199956 | Kammerer | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6378952 | Moosmann et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6397652 | Sollami | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6561058 | Steinke | May 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3144060 | May 1983 | DE |
3701905 | Sep 1988 | DE |
3712427 | Oct 1988 | DE |
4306206 | Sep 1994 | DE |
29614096 | Dec 1997 | DE |
19720635 | Nov 1998 | DE |
0264015 | Apr 1988 | EP |
0295232 | Dec 1988 | EP |
0639437 | Feb 1995 | EP |
9727383 | Jul 1997 | WO |
0043636 | Jul 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020153175 A1 | Oct 2002 | US |