The present invention provides a muffler for internal combustion engines which delivers improved horsepower and/or fuel efficiency over standard mufflers.
Due to environmental concerns, governmental entities have steadily imposed stricter limits on the amount and type of exhaust emitted by vehicles powered by the internal combustion engine. Moreover, the amount of noise produced by such engines must also meet stringent standards. While such limits may improve air quality and decrease noise pollution, such limits also produce severe drawbacks in increased fuel consumption and decreased power production by the affected engines. It is believed that such drawbacks are a result of back pressure of exhaust gas created by the very equipment that muffles the noise and cleans the exhaust gas. Accordingly, it is believed that such drawbacks can be mitigated by equipment that will increase exhaust flow-through.
Various systems have been proposed to provide a more efficient means of reducing noise and/or air pollution from internal combustion engine exhaust. Some such proposed systems are found in U.S. Pat. No. 4,533,015 to Kojima; U.S. Pat. No. 4,339,918 to Michikawa; U.S. Pat. No. 4,331,213 to Taniguchi; U.S. Pat. No. 4,317,502 to Harris et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 4,303,143 to Taniguchi; U.S. Pat. No. 4,222,456 to Kasper; U.S. Pat. No. 4,129,196 to Everett; U.S. Pat. No. 4,109,753 to Lyman; U.S. Pat. No. 4,050,539 to Kashiwara et al.; and U.S. Pat. No. 3,016,692 to Iapella et al. However, the quest to decrease noise and exhaust emissions, while off-setting the concomitant decreases in fuel efficiency and power production, proves to be an ongoing struggle.
The present invention provides a muffler comprising a rotatable propeller within or adjacent to an expansion chamber to swirl exhaust gas towards the outlet. The muffler maintains the sound level of the exhaust within acceptable limits, while delivering improved power and/or fuel efficiency over that of standard mufflers.
The invention is described by the following examples. It should be recognized that variations based on the inventive features disclosed herein are within the skill of the ordinary artisan, and that the scope of the invention should not be limited by the examples. To properly determine the scope of the invention, an interested party should consider the claims herein, and any equivalent thereof. In addition, all citations herein are incorporated by reference.
An inlet tube 12 is attached at a proximal end 122 to shell 16 at inlet 162. A distal end 124 of inlet tube 12 is attached directly or indirectly to an exhaust gas source, such as an internal combustion engine (not shown). The interior 126 of inlet tube 12 opens up into an expansion chamber 18 defined by the interior of an expansion chamber tube 20. The expansion chamber tube 20 is attached substantially coaxially to outer shell 16. Although shown as attached to the outer shell so that a portion of the outer shell defines expansion chamber, expansion chamber tube 20 can be tapered at its ends, such that its opposing openings may also define inlet 162 and outlet 164. Moreover, expansion chamber tube 20 is attached to outer shell 16 such that the exterior of the expansion chamber tube 20 and the interior of the outer shell 16 combine to define a sound suppression sleeve 22 that surrounds the expansion chamber 18.
Sound suppression sleeve 22 is packed with known sound suppression materials. Examples of such materials include fiberglass, glass wool, copper wool, copper strands, steel wool, etc. In an embodiment the sound suppression material is fiberglass. Tube 20 is perforated with apertures (not shown) so that the expansion chamber 18 is in communication with the materials in the sound suppression sleeve 22. In an embodiment, tube 20 has about a 50% porosity. In another embodiment, tube 20 has between about 40 to about 80% porosity. In another embodiment, expansion chamber 18 has at least about 85% greater flow cross-sectional area than inlet tube 12. In a further embodiment, expansion chamber 18 has at least about 75% greater flow cross-sectional area than inlet tube 12. In yet another embodiment, expansion chamber 18 has between about 75% to about 90% greater flow cross-sectional area than inlet tube 12.
In an embodiment, within expansion chamber 18, at an end proximal to inlet tube 12, a propeller 24 (see
Various methods of mounting the propeller on the supports are known. In an embodiment, the propellers are mounted on a teflon-filled bronze bearing, which is, in turn, mounted on a standard shoulder screw, attached to the propeller support. In another embodiment, the propellers are mounted on a shoulder screw, which is mounted in a teflon-filled bronze bearing that is attached to the propeller support. The bearings and screws are also made of stainless steel or alloy steel. As shown in
In
In an alternative embodiment, propeller 24 is supported within the proximal end 122 of the inlet tube 12 (
As shown in the drawings, with particular reference to
It is found that the exemplary embodiments of the invention provide high performance propulsion mufflers that increase horsepower and/or fuel efficiency for internal combustion engines, while maintaining the sound level of the engine within acceptable levels. Without being limited by any particular theory, it is believed that as the exhaust gas enter the muffler, the propeller forces the gas to rotate into a tightly spun vortex, as the gas expands in the expansion chamber. This facilitates the flow of the gasses through the expansion chamber, and through the outlet tube. This effect creates a vacuum, which draws more gasses from the exhaust source, increasing the exhaust throughput of the engine.
Relative to similar standard mufflers that do not have the propeller, it has been found that the horsepower of the engine can be increased by up to about 19%. In an embodiment, the horsepower was improved to between about 13 and about 19%. In another embodiment the fuel milage was increased by up to about 12% in city driving, and up to about 15% in highway driving. In a further embodiment, the fuel efficiency was improved to between about 5 to about 12% in the city. In yet another embodiment, the fuel efficiency was improved to between about 6 and about 15% on the highway. Vehicles that may benefit from such a muffler include trucks, automobiles, lawn mowers, boats, snowmobiles, power machinery, or other equipment driven by the internal combustion engine.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
832124 | Farmer | Oct 1906 | A |
867973 | Hoover | Oct 1907 | A |
1229471 | Jones et al. | Jun 1917 | A |
1286365 | Loomis | Dec 1918 | A |
1473235 | Jones | Nov 1923 | A |
1685006 | Schultz | Sep 1928 | A |
1816245 | Wolford | Jul 1931 | A |
1818469 | Floyd, Jr. | Aug 1931 | A |
2076827 | Ross | Apr 1937 | A |
2646854 | Walker | Jul 1953 | A |
3000465 | Bruno | Sep 1961 | A |
3016692 | Lapella et al. | Jan 1962 | A |
3017948 | Shepherd | Jan 1962 | A |
3182748 | Wirt | May 1965 | A |
4050539 | Kashiwara et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4109753 | Lyman | Aug 1978 | A |
4129196 | Everett | Dec 1978 | A |
4222456 | Kasper | Sep 1980 | A |
4263981 | Weiss et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4263982 | Feuling | Apr 1981 | A |
4303143 | Taniguchi | Dec 1981 | A |
4317502 | Harris et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4331213 | Taniguchi | May 1982 | A |
4339918 | Michikawa | Jul 1982 | A |
4533015 | Kojima | Aug 1985 | A |
5676468 | Webb | Oct 1997 | A |
5872342 | Gysling | Feb 1999 | A |
5962822 | May | Oct 1999 | A |
6343673 | Chang | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6796296 | Kim | Sep 2004 | B2 |
20040046391 | Vasudeva | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040050618 | Marocco | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050011697 | Arlasky | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050045418 | Choi | Mar 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2224540 | May 1990 | GB |
56032023 | Apr 1981 | JP |
04081507 | Mar 1992 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050011697 A1 | Jan 2005 | US |