Patent Grant
8596215
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to methods and devices for coating stents.
2. Description of the State of the Art
This invention relates to radially expandable endoprostheses, that are adapted to be implanted in a bodily lumen. An “endoprosthesis” corresponds to an artificial device that is placed inside the body. A “lumen” refers to a cavity of a tubular organ such as a blood vessel. A stent is an example of such an endoprosthesis. Stents are generally cylindrically shaped devices, that function to hold open and sometimes expand a segment of a blood vessel or other anatomical lumen such as urinary tracts and bile ducts. Stents are often used in the treatment of atherosclerotic stenosis in blood vessels. “Stenosis” refers to a narrowing or constriction of a bodily passage or orifice. In such treatments, stents reinforce body vessels and prevent restenosis following angioplasty in the vascular system. “Restenosis” refers to the reoccurrence of stenosis in a blood vessel or heart valve after it has been treated (as by balloon angioplasty, stenting, or valvuloplasty) with apparent success.
Stents are typically composed of scaffolding that includes a pattern or network of interconnecting structural elements or struts, formed from wires, tubes, or sheets of material rolled into a cylindrical shape. This scaffolding gets its name because it physically holds open and, if desired, expands the wall of the passageway. Typically, stents are capable of being compressed or crimped onto a catheter so that they can be delivered to and deployed at a treatment site. Delivery includes inserting the stent through small lumens using a catheter and transporting it to the treatment site. Deployment includes expanding the stent to a larger diameter once it is at the desired location. Mechanical intervention with stents has reduced the rate of restenosis as compared to balloon angioplasty. Yet, restenosis remains a significant problem. When restenosis does occur in the stented segment, its treatment can be challenging, as clinical options are more limited than for those lesions that were treated solely with a balloon.
Stents are used not only for mechanical intervention but also as vehicles for providing biological therapy. Biological therapy uses medicated stents to locally administer a therapeutic substance. Effective concentrations at the treated site require systemic drug administration which often produces adverse or even toxic side effects. Local delivery is a preferred treatment method because it administers smaller total medication levels than systemic methods, but concentrates the drug at a specific site. Local delivery thus produces fewer side effects and achieves better results.
A medicated stent may be fabricated by coating the surface of a stent with an active agent or an active agent and a polymeric carrier. Those of ordinary skill in the art fabricate coatings by applying a polymer, or a blend of polymers, to the stent using well-known techniques. Such a coating composition may include a polymer solution and an active agent dispersed in the solution. The composition may be applied to the stent by immersing the stent in the composition or by spraying the composition onto the stent. The solvent then evaporates, leaving on the stent surfaces a polymer coating impregnated with the drug or active agent.
Accurately loading drugs, minimizing coating defects, and coating with pure coating materials favor improved coating quality. In addition, adequate throughput of the overall manufacturing process is also of concern.
One aspect of the present invention is directed to embodiments of a method of drying a stent that may include disposing a stent in a chamber. The stent may have a coating material including a polymer and a solvent applied to a surface of the stent. The method may further include directing a fluid stream at the stent to remove at least a portion of the coating material, measuring a temperature of the fluid at a location adjacent to the stent, and controlling a temperature of the fluid stream based on the measured temperature so as to maintain a desired temperature adjacent to the stent.
A stent drying apparatus, which may include a chamber configured to receive a stent having coating material including a polymer and a solvent, is also disclosed. The chamber may be adapted to receive a fluid stream that contacts the coated stent. In some embodiments, the fluid stream removes at least a portion of the coating material. A temperature sensor may be positioned adjacent to the stent for measuring the temperature of the fluid stream contacting the stent. The apparatus may further include a controller connected to the sensor, wherein the controller adjusts a temperature of the fluid stream based on the measured temperature so as to maintain a desired temperature of the fluid stream contacting the stent.
Other aspects of the present invention are directed to embodiments of a fixture for supporting a stent during weighing that may include a pan that can support a stent greater than about 28 mm in length along the stent's entire length. Pan geometry may be optimized to minimize fixture mass.
A method of coating a stent comprising the step of modifying the flow rate of a coating material sprayed onto the stent while axially moving the stent is also disclosed. In these or other embodiments, the stent repeatedly passes from one end of the stent to another relative to a major axis of the stent adjacent to a fixed or movable spray nozzle. Some of these methods further include adjusting the axial speed during spraying of the stent based on the modified flow rate of the coating material to deposit a selected amount of coating material per pass.
Additional embodiments of invention coating methods include spraying a coating material from a nozzle onto a stent substantially concurrently with axially moving the stent. This axial movement causes the stent to pass repeatedly from one end of the stent to another. The method may further include controlling the rate of the movement to deposit a selected amount of coating material per pass.
In these or other embodiments, the method may include increasing the flow rate of material sprayed onto the stent as the stent is moved axially. The method may further include adjusting the stent's speed based on the increased flow rate to deposit a selected amount of coating material on the stent.
A method of coating a stent that includes increasing the flow rate of material sprayed onto a stent in which the stent is axially translated relative to the sprayed coating material during spraying of the stent. The motion causes the stent to pass repeatedly from one end of the stent to another. The method may further include adjusting the axial translation speed of the stent based on the increased flow rate of the coating material to deposit a selected amount of material per pass.
A stent coating device that includes a first support element for rotating a first end of a stent and a second support element for rotating a second end of the stent, wherein the first and second rates of rotation are the same as or different from each other is disclosed.
A device for coating a stent that includes a support element for rotating a stent, wherein the support element is capable of providing at least one pulse in a rotation rate of the support element during stent coating is also disclosed.
Other device embodiments are disclosed. For instance, a device that may include a stent support element is disclosed. The element may be capable of providing at least one pulse in the rate of axial motion of the stent during coating of the stent, wherein the pulse allows the support element to move axially relative to the stent.
Additional devices for coating stents may include a support element for rotating the stent. In these or other embodiments, the element includes at least three elongate arms converging inwardly from a proximal end to a distal end to form a conical or frusto-conical shape. The support element may be capable of being positioned within an end of a stent during coating.
Further aspects of the present invention are directed to embodiments of a method of coating a stent that may include rotating a stent with a first rotatable element supporting a proximal end of the stent and a second rotatable element supporting a second end of the stent. The first rotatable element may rotate at a different rate than the second rotatable element at least a portion of a time during coating of the stent.
Another aspect of the present invention is directed to embodiments of a method of coating a stent that may include rotating a stent with a rotatable element supporting at least a portion of a stent. The method may further include providing at least one pulse in a rotation rate of the rotatable element during coating of the stent.
Other aspects of the present invention are directed to embodiments of a method of coating a stent that may include rotating a stent with a first rotatable element supporting a proximal end of the stent and rotating the stent with a second rotatable element supporting a distal end of the stent, the first rotatable element having the same rotation rate as the second rotatable element. The method may further include providing at least one pulse in a rotation rate of the first rotatable element during coating of the stent, the first rotatable element having a rotation rate different from the second rotatable element during the pulse, the pulse causing the first rotatable element to rotate relative to the stent.
Some aspects of the present invention are directed to embodiments of a method of coating a stent that may include positioning a support element within an end of a stent to support the stent. The method may further include providing at least one translational pulse to the support element along an axis of the stent during coating of the stent, whereby the translational pulse causes the support element to move axially relative to the stent.
Other aspects of the present invention are directed to embodiments of a method of coating a stent that may include rotating a stent with a support element having at least three elongate arms converging inwardly from a proximal end to a distal end of each arm to form a conical or frusto-conical shape, the support element positioned so that the elongate arms converge inwardly within an end of the stent to support the stent.
Certain aspects of the present invention are directed to embodiments of a method of coating a stent that may include contacting a first axial portion of a stent with a support element such that a second axial portion does not contact the support element or any other support element. The method may further include applying a coating material to the second axial portion and inhibiting or preventing application of the coating material on the first axial portion.
Certain aspects of the present invention are directed to embodiments of an apparatus for supporting a stent that may include a first support rod for supporting a proximal end of a stent, the first support rod coupled to a first collet opposite the proximal end of the stent. The apparatus may further include a second support rod for supporting a distal end of the stent, the second support rod coupled to a second collet opposite the distal end of the stent. The apparatus may also include a third support rod for supporting the first collet and the second collet, the first collet being coupled to a proximal end of the third support rod, the second collet being coupled to a distal end of the third support rod, wherein the third support rod extends between the first collet and the second collet outside of and free of any contact with the stent.
Certain aspects of the present invention are directed to embodiments of a device for supporting a stent that may include a filament having a spiral coiled portion, the coiled portion designed to support the stent at a plurality of contact points between the stent and the spiral coiled portion along a least a portion of an axis of the stent.
Certain aspects of the present invention are directed to embodiments of a collet for supporting a stent during coating that may include a generally tubular member having an end surface for contacting an end of a stent. The end surface may include a projecting portion and a flat or relatively flat portion. The projecting portion may include at least three segments radiating from a center of the end surface to an edge of the end surface, a thickness of the segments in a plane of the surface decreasing from the center to the edge of the end surface, and a height of the projecting portion perpendicular to the plane of the surface decreasing from the center of the end surface to the edge.
Certain aspects of the present invention are directed to embodiments of a stent support for supporting a stent during coating that may include a generally tubular support member supporting a stent, the support element having at least one magnetic element. The stent support may further include an electromagnetic device positioned adjacent to the mandrel for generating an electrical field that allows the magnetic element to support, rotate, and/or translate the mandrel.
Some aspects of the present invention are directed to embodiments of a method of manufacturing an implantable medical device that includes purifying a polymer by: contacting the polymer with a fluid capable of swelling the polymer and removing all or substantially all of the fluid from the polymer such that an impurity from the polymer is completely or at least partially removed by the fluid. The fluid may be selected from the group consisting of isopropyl acetate and propyl acetate. The method may further include coating an implantable medical device with the purified polymer, or fabricating the implantable medical device from purified polymer.
Embodiments of the present invention relate to coating implantable medical devices such as stents. More generally, embodiments of the present invention may also be used in coating devices including, but not limited to, self-expandable stents, balloon-expandable stents, stent-grafts, vascular grafts, cerebrospinal fluid shunts, pacemaker leads, closure devices for patent foramen ovale, and synthetic heart valves.
In particular, a stent can have virtually any structural pattern that is compatible with a bodily lumen in which it is implanted. Typically, a stent is composed of a pattern or network of circumferential and longitudinally extending interconnecting structural elements or struts. In general, the struts are arranged in patterns, which are designed to contact the lumen walls of a vessel and to maintain vascular patency. A myriad of strut patterns are known in the art for achieving particular design goals. A few of the more important design characteristics of stents are radial or hoop strength, expansion ratio or coverage area, and longitudinal flexibility. Embodiments of the present invention are applicable to virtually any stent design and are, therefore, not limited to any particular stent design or pattern. One embodiment of a stent pattern may include cylindrical rings composed of struts. The cylindrical rings may be connected by connecting struts.
In some embodiments, a stent may be formed from a tube by laser cutting the pattern of struts in the tube. The stent may also be formed by laser cutting a metallic or polymeric sheet, rolling the pattern into the shape of the cylindrical stent, and providing a longitudinal weld to form the stent. Other methods of forming stents are well known and include chemically etching a metallic or polymeric sheet and rolling and then welding it to form the stent.
In other embodiments, a metallic or polymeric filament or wire may also be coiled to form the stent. Filaments of polymer may be extruded or melt spun. These filaments can then be cut, formed into ring elements, welded closed, corrugated to form crowns, and then the crowns welded together by heat or solvent to form the stent.
The cross-section of the struts in stent 10 may be rectangular- or circular-shaped. The cross-section of struts is not limited to these, and therefore, other cross-sectional shapes are applicable with embodiments of the present invention. Furthermore, the pattern should not be limited to what has been illustrated as other stent patterns are easily applicable with embodiments of the present invention.
As indicated above, a medicated coating on a stent may be fabricated by spraying a coating composition including polymer and drug on the stent. Spray coating a stent typically involves mounting or disposing a stent on a support, followed by spraying a coating material from a nozzle onto the mounted stent.
A spray apparatus, such as EFD 780S spray device with VALVEMATE 7040 control system (manufactured by EFD Inc., East Providence, R.I., can be used to apply a composition to a stent. A EFD 780S spray device is an air-assisted external mixing atomizer. The composition is atomized into small droplets by air and uniformly applied to the stent surfaces. Other types of spray applicators, including air-assisted internal mixing atomizers and ultrasonic applicators, can also be used for the application of the composition.
To facilitate uniform and complete coverage of the stent during the application of the composition, the stent can be rotated about the stent's central longitudinal axis. Rotation of the stent can be from about 0.1 rpm to about 300 rpm, more narrowly from about 30 rpm to about 200 rpm. By way of example, the stent can rotate at about 150 rpm. The stent can also be moved in a linear direction along the same axis. The stent can be moved at about 1 mm/second to about 12 mm/second, for example about 6 mm/second, or for a minimum of at least two passes (i.e., back and forth past the spray nozzle).
A nozzle can deposit coating material onto a stent in the form of fine droplets. An atomization pressure of a sprayer can be maintained at a range of about 5 psi to about 30 psi. The droplet size depends on factors such as viscosity of the solution, surface tension of the solvent, and atomization pressure. The flow rate of the composition from the spray nozzle can be from about 0.01 mg/second to about 1.0 mg/second, for example about 0.1 mg/second. Only a small percentage of the composition that is delivered from the spray nozzle is ultimately deposited on the stent. By way of example, when a composition is sprayed to deliver about 1 mg of solids, only about 100 micrograms or about 10% of the solids sprayed will likely be deposited on the stent.
Depositing a coating of a desired thickness in a single coating stage can result in an undesirably nonuniform surface structure and/or coating defects. Therefore, the coating process can involve multiple repetitions of spraying forming a plurality of layers. Each repetition can be, for example, about 0.5 second to about 20 seconds, for example about 10 seconds in duration. The amount of coating applied by each repetition can be about 1 microgram/cm2 (of stent surface) to about 50 micrograms/cm2, for example less than about 20 micrograms/cm2 per 1-second spray.
As indicated above, the coating composition can include a polymer dissolved in a solvent. Each repetition can be followed by removal of a significant amount of the solvent(s). In an embodiment, there may be less than 5%, 3%, or more narrowly, less than 1% of solvent remaining in the coating after drying between repetitions. When the coating process is completed, all or substantially all of the solvent may be removed from the coating material on the stent. Any suitable number of repetitions of applying the composition followed by removing the solvent(s) can be performed to form a coating of a desired thickness or weight. Excessive application of the polymer can, however, cause coating defects.
A stent coated with coating material can be dried by allowing the solvent to evaporate at room or ambient temperature. Depending on the volatility of the particular solvent employed, the solvent can evaporate essentially upon contact with the stent. Alternatively, the solvent can be removed by subjecting the coated stent to various drying processes. Drying time can be decreased to increase manufacturing throughput by heating the coated stent. For example, removal of the solvent can be induced by baking the stent in an oven at a mild temperature (e.g., 60° C.) for a suitable duration of time (e.g., 2-4 hours) or by the application of warm air. A stent is typically dried in an oven as the final drying step when the deposition stages are completed.
Evaporation of the solvent(s) can be induced by application of a warm gas between each repetition which can prevent coating defects and minimize interaction between the active agent and the solvent. The stent may be positioned below a nozzle blowing the warm gas. A warm gas may be particularly suitable for embodiments in which the solvent employed in the coating composition is a non-volatile solvent (e.g., dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), dimethylformamide (DMF), and dimethylacetamide (DMAC)). The temperature of the warm gas can be from about 25° C. to about 200° C., more narrowly from about 40° C. to about 90° C. By way of example, warm gas applications can be performed at a temperature of about 60° C., at a flow speed of about 5,000 feet/minute, and for about 10 seconds.
The gas can be directed onto the stent following a waiting period of about 0.1 second to about 5 seconds after the application of the coating composition so as to allow the liquid sufficient time to flow and spread over the stent surface before the solvent(s) is removed to form a coating. The waiting period is particularly suitable if the coating composition contains a volatile solvent since such solvents are typically removed quickly. As used herein “volatile solvent” means a solvent that has a vapor pressure greater than 17.54 Torr at ambient temperature, and “non-volatile solvent” means a solvent that has a vapor pressure less than or equal to 17.54 Torr at ambient temperature.
Any suitable gas can be employed, examples of which include air, argon, or nitrogen. The flow rate of the warm gas can be from about 20 cubic feet/minute (CFM) (0.57 cubic meters/minute (CMM)) to about 80 CFM (2.27 CMM), more narrowly about 30 CFM (0.85 CMM) to about 40 CFM (1.13 CMM). The warm gas can be applied for about 3 seconds to about 60 seconds, more narrowly for about 10 seconds to about 20 seconds. By way of example, warm air applications can be performed at a temperature of about 50° C., at a flow rate of about 40 CFM, and for about 10 seconds.
Regardless of the method used for drying a stent, it is important for the drying process to be performed in a consistent manner for each layer and each stent. The same or similar processing conditions or parameters should exist for each layer of coating material applied for each stent. The reason for this is that drying process parameters can influence the molecular structure and morphology of a dried polymer and drug coating. Drug release parameters depend upon on molecular structure and morphology of a coating. Therefore, drug release parameters depend upon parameters of the drying process. For example, generally, the rate of a drying process is directly proportional to the resultant drug release rate of a resultant coating.
Since the temperature of a drying process is directly related to the rate of drying, it is important to control the drying temperature to obtain coating consistency. In general, the more consistent the temperature during the drying process from layer to layer and stent to stent, the more consistent the resultant coating in a given stent and from stent to stent.
Various embodiments of a method and device for drying a stent in a consistent manner are described herein.
Additionally, chamber 102 has a proximal opening 106 for receiving a stream of heated fluid or gas, as shown by an arrow 110, and a distal opening 108 through which the fluid exits, as shown by an arrow 112. The fluid may be an inert gas such as air, nitrogen, oxygen, argon, etc.
As shown in
Temperature sensor 124 measures the drying temperature to gather feedback (TF) for controlling the drying temperature of stent 118. Sensor 124 is coupled to a control system 132 by a sensor wire 128. Any suitable control system, such as a closed loop system, can be used for maintaining the drying temperature of the coating at a desired temperature (TD). A temperature, TF, measured by sensor 124 is transmitted via wire 128 to control system 132. Control system 132 compares TF to TD and then transmits a signal 134 to fluid source 114. Signal 134 carries instructions to fluid source 114 to adjust the temperature of the fluid stream supplied to chamber 102 if the difference in temperature is larger than a selected tolerance. In some embodiments, the desired temperature TD can be a function of time or thickness.
Temperature sensor 126 monitors a drying temperature of the stent that is independent of a control system. A monitored temperature, TM, can be transmitted by a temperature sensor wire 130 to a display or an automated system (not shown). The control system, in some instances, may be unable to maintain a desired drying temperature. For example, the drying temperature may deviate substantially from a desired temperature. A user can be alerted to the deviation by a displayed TM and take appropriate action, such as shutting down the drying process and discarding the coated stent. Alternatively, an automated system can be configured to take appropriate action such as shutting down the drying process.
Table 1 presents data for stents dried at two different temperatures using an embodiment of the drying apparatus discussed herein. Ten different sample runs were performed at each temperature. The stents were Xience-V stents obtained from Guidant Corporation, Santa Clara, Calif. The coating runs included application of a primer layer and a drug-matrix or reservoir layer over the primer layer. The coating material for the primer layer was poly(n-butyl methacrylate) (PBMA) in an acetone/cyclohexanone solvent. The coating material for the reservoir layer was poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropene) copolymer (PVDF-HFP) (e.g., SOLEF 21508, available from Solvay Solexis PVDF, Thorofare, N.J.) in an acetone/cyclohexanone solvent.
Ten samples were dried at each temperature. Each sample was dried over a 24 hour period. Table 1 provides the percentage of solvent released during the drying period for each sample at each temperature.
As expected, a larger percentage of solvent was released at the higher temperature. At 35° C., approximately 72% to 77% of the solvent was released from the stent samples and at 65° C. all or substantially all of the solvent was released. At 65° C., for samples 1, 4, 5, 7, and 9, the measured percentage released was greater than 100%. This is likely due to errors in weighing the stent samples before and after drying. At 35° C., the standard deviation was less than 4° C. and the percent coefficient of variation (% CV) was less than 5° C. At 65° C., the standard deviation and % CV were both less than 2° C. The relatively low values of standard deviation and % CV suggest that the drying method tends to dry stents relatively consistently.
The amount of coating material applied to a stent is typically determined by comparing the weight of an uncoated and coated stent. The weight of a coated stent can be taken to be the dry coating weight. Stents are typically weighed using a microbalance, for example, the UMX5 Microbalance from Mettler-Toledo, Inc. of Columbus, Ohio. A sample to be weighed, such as a stent, is disposed on a weighing pan of coupled to a balance for weighing. The maximum capacity of the UMX5 Microbalance including a weighing pan (including its support) is 2.1 g. The weight of a coated stent is approximately 0.4 g. Therefore, the maximum weight of a weighing pan and its support is about 1.7 g for the above-mentioned balance.
Weighing pans that are currently available for microbalances have a maximum surface diameter of under about 28 mm. Therefore, such pans cannot accommodate stents longer than about 28 mm without portions of the stent hanging over an edge of the pan. Hanging portions during weighing are undesirable due to the risk of the stent rolling off the pan. Such pans also have a flat surface with no raised features that facilitate loading of the stent or reduce or prevent rolling off of the stent from the pan.
Stents over 28 mm in length are not accommodated by current weighing pans. However, increasing the diameter of the current weighing pans to accommodate such stents may result in a weighing pan that exceeds the weighing capacity of a typical microbalance. What is needed is a weighing pan that can accommodate stents over 28 mm in length without exceeding the capacity of a typical microbalance.
Embodiments of the present invention relate to a fixture that includes a weighing pan for weighing stents that are greater than about 28 mm in length. In one embodiment, a fixture for supporting a stent during weighing may include a plate or pan. At least a portion of an area of a surface of the pan can support a stent greater than about 28 mm in length along an entire length of the stent without end portions of the stent hanging over an edge of the pan. For example, a portion of an area of the surface can support a 28 mm, 33 mm, or 38 mm stent along its entire length. In certain embodiments, a geometry of the pan is optimized to minimize a mass of the pan, and thus the fixture. In particular, the mass of the fixture may be optimized so that the weight of the fixture and a stent does not exceed the capacity of a selected microbalance.
In one embodiment, the fixture may include a pan having a plurality of holes in a surface of the pan to reduce the mass of the fixture. The pan may have a shape that includes, but is not limited to, circular, oval, rectangular, etc. The holes tend to reduce the mass of the pan while still allowing the surface of the pan to support a stent along its entire length.
The mass of a pan may be optimized to a desired mass by varying the size and number of holes. As the size of the holes decreases, the number of holes required to reduce the mass of the pan a selected amount increases. This is illustrated in
In some embodiments, the pan of a fixture may have an asymmetric shape that is longer along one axis, for example, an oval, rectangular, or dumbbell shape. The surface along the longer axis may be configured to accommodate a stent greater than 28 mm in length along its entire length.
As the asymmetry of a pan increases, a fixture may tend to become less stable. Additionally, a stent has an increased risk of rolling off a pan that is highly asymmetric. A more stable geometry of the pan may include at least two intersecting elongated portions. At least one of the intersecting portions may be adapted to support a stent greater 28 mm in length along its entire length.
In some embodiments, a weighing pan may include surface features at or adjacent to at least a portion of an edge of the pan to facilitate placement or removal of a stent on the pan. The features may also inhibit a stent from falling or rolling off the pan. For example, the features may include, but are not limited to, ridges, bumps, or protrusions along at least a portion of the pan.
A further aspect of the present invention relates to manipulation of spray coating parameters to obtain desired processing goals and coating characteristics. Spray coating parameters that may be manipulated can include, but are not limited to, flow rate of coating material, axial translation speed of stent, rotation speed, nozzle height, and atomization pressure.
Stent 252 is supported by a stent support 262, such as a mandrel, other support devices known in the art, or support devices as described herein. Support 262 is configured to rotate stent 252 about its cylindrical axis, as shown by an arrow 264. Support 262 is also configured to axially or linearly translate stent 252 with respect to plume 260, as shown by an arrow 266. In other embodiments, nozzle 258 can be translated along the cylindrical axis of stent 252 rather than or in addition to axially translating stent 252.
Coating material is deposited on stent 252 as it is translated through plume 260 from a proximal end 268 to a distal end 270 of stent 252. After a selected number of passes through plume 260, the deposited coating material is allowed to dry or subjected to a drying process known in the art or described herein prior to further deposition of coating material. The deposition and drying steps are repeated until a desired amount of coating material is deposited on stent 252.
One aspect of the present invention relates to increasing the rate of the coating process or increasing throughput of the coated stents while maintaining coating quality. In one embodiment, the rate of the coating process can be increased by increasing the flow rate of coating material through nozzle. This can be accomplished by increasing the pump rate of coating material, as described above. An increased flow rate of coating material increases the amount or mass of coating material deposited per unit time on the stent or per pass of the nozzle over the stent.
However, increasing the flow rate, and mass per pass, can have deleterious effects on coating quality. First, an increased mass per pass can lead to defects in the coating, as well as inconsistencies in the coating from layer to layer and stent to stent. Second, increasing the mass per mass increases the drying time of the deposited coating material. Due to the increased drying time, there is an increased likelihood of the nozzle clogging between passes. Residual coating material in the nozzle can dry and reduce or prevent flow of coating material through the nozzle. Embodiments of the method described herein allow an increase in throughput and flow rate of coating material while maintaining coating consistency resulting in an acceptable level of defects. In addition, the increased flow rate does not lead to an increase in nozzle clogging.
Certain embodiments of a method of coating a stent may include modifying a flow rate of coating material sprayed onto a stent by a coating apparatus. The method may further include adjusting an axial translation speed of the stent based on the modified flow rate during spraying of the coating material to obtain a selected amount of deposition of coating material per pass of the stent relative to the nozzle. In one embodiment, an axial translation speed of the stent may be controlled to obtain a selected amount of deposition or mass per pass of coating material.
In an embodiment, the flow rate of the coating material directed at the stent from a nozzle of the coating apparatus may be increased. The axial translation speed may then be increased to compensate for the increased flow rate. The increased axial translation speed tends to decrease the mass per pass at the increased flow rate. The axial translation speed may be increased so that the mass per pass does not result in a drying time that results in clogging of the nozzle during drying of deposited coating material on the stent. In addition, the axial translation speed may be increased so that the mass per pass results in a relatively consistent coating from pass to pass and that has an acceptable quantity and degree of defects.
Table 2 illustrates the effect of pump rate and linear or axial speed on the mass per pass and coating quality. The coating quality was based on a visual inspection of the coated stent under a microscope. Inspections are performed of a coated stent at a magnification between 40× and 100× under a microscope. The coating quality is based on size and number of defects including the presence of cobwebs and rough spots. In general, in order to pass, a stent must be free of defects over a certain size and have less than a specified number of cobwebs and rough spots.
Coating runs were performed on a 28 mm stent for different pump rates of coating material and linear or axial speed of the stent under a nozzle. The mass per mass in each run was determined by the difference in weight of the stent before and after coating.
The coating runs included application of a primer layer and a drug-matrix or reservoir layer over the primer layer. The coating material for the primer layer was poly(n-butyl methacrylate) (PBMA) in an acetone/cyclohexanone solvent. The coating material for the reservoir layer was poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropene) copolymer (PVDF-HFP) (e.g., SOLEF 21508, available from Solvay Solexis PVDF, Thorofare, N.J.) in an acetone/cyclohexanone solvent.
The coating equipment included a Havard syringe pump obtained from Instech Laboratories, Inc., Plymouth Meeting, Pa. The nozzle and mandrel used were developed in-house.
As shown in Table 2, Runs 1 and 2 were performed at a pump rate of 12 mg/sec and linear or axial speed of 6 mm/sec. The mass per pass differed slightly between the two runs and the coating quality was a “pass.”
The linear or axial speed for Runs 3-6 was increased from 6 mm/sec to 12 mm/sec from Runs 1 and 2. The pump rate for Runs 3-6 was the same as Runs 1 and 2. Table 2 shows, as expected, that the increase in the linear or axial speed caused a decrease in the mass per mass. As indicated above, an increase in linear or axial speed tends to decrease the mass per pass. The mass per pass of Runs 3-6 is slightly more than a third of the mass per pass of Runs 1 and 2. In addition, the coating quality was a “pass” for each of Runs 3-6.
In Runs 7-10, both the pump rate and linear or axial speed were increased over that used in Runs 3-6 from 12 ml/hr to 18 ml/hr and 12 mm/sec to 18 mm/sec, respectively. In general, the increase in the pump rate tends to increase the mass per pass. However, the increase in the linear or axial speed compensates for the increase in the increased pump rate since the mass per pass of Runs 7-10 is less than Runs 3-6. The coating quality is a “pass” for Runs 8-10 and a “fail” for Run 7.
In Runs 11 and 12, the pump rate and linear or axial speed were both further increased over that used in Runs 7-10 from 18 ml/hr to 24 ml/hr and from 18 mm/sec to 24 mm/sec, respectively. In this case, the increase in the pump rate resulted in an increase in the mass per pass. The increase in the linear or axial speed only partially compensated for the increase in flow rate. In each of Runs 11 and 12, the coating quality was a pass. Nominal refers to the center or standard parameter run.
Another aspect of the present invention relates to reducing or eliminating coating defects that can result from stent contact with supports, such as mandrels, during coating. A shortcoming of the above-described method of medicating a stent through application of a coating is the potential for coating defects. While some coating defects can be minimized by adjusting the coating parameters, other defects occur due to the nature of the interface between the stent and the apparatus on which the stent is supported during the coating process. A high degree of surface contact between the stent and the supporting apparatus can provide regions in which the liquid composition can flow, wick, and collect as the composition is applied. As the solvent evaporates, the excess composition hardens to form excess coating at and around the contact points between the stent and the supporting apparatus. Upon the removal of the coated stent from the supporting apparatus, the excess coating may stick to the apparatus, thereby removing some of the needed coating from the stent and leaving bare areas. Alternatively, the excess coating may stick to the stent, thereby leaving excess coating as clumps or pools on the struts or webbing between the struts.
Thus, it is desirable to minimize the influence of the interface between the stent and the supporting apparatus during the coating process to reduce or coating defects. Accordingly, the present invention provides for embodiments of a method and device for supporting a stent during the coating application process that minimizes the influence of the interface.
As described above, spray coating a stent typically involves mounting or disposing a stent on a support, followed by spraying a coating material from a nozzle onto the mounted stent. A stent can be supported, for example, on a mandrel or rod that supports the stent along its length by positioning the stent over the mandrel. A stent can also be supported at its ends with supports having a variety of geometries, such as tapered or untapered cylinders.
As indicated above, the interface or contact points between a stent support and the stent can lead to defects. This is particularly the case where the support and the stent do not move relative to one another during the coating process. The lack of relative movement leads to stationary contact points between the stent and the support.
The contact area between a support and stent can be minimized by sizing a support such as a mandrel so that its diameter is less than the inside diameter of the stent. Similarly, the ends of a stent can be supported loosely over tapered or untapered cylinders. Thus, as the mandrel rotates, the contact points continuously change. A disadvantage of this approach is that the stent can stick to the support members, resulting in stationary contact points.
Embodiments of the present invention relate to a method of and a device for shifting or changing the contact points of a stent with a support during a coating process. In certain embodiments, the shift in contact points may be accomplished by a pulse in the rotation rate of a support member that rotates and causes a stent to rotate. A “pulse” generally refers to a rise and/or fall in a quantity during a period of time. Shifting or changing a contact point, area, or interface refers to a change of a point, area, or interface of contact of a stent with a support from one location of the support to another location of the support.
Mandrel 20 is illustrated as having two regions with a larger diameter. The two regions can be support elements 22 for applying a torque to stent 15. In commercially useful embodiments, any number of support elements 22 can be used to adequately support stent 15. As shown, support elements 22 are sized larger than the outer diameter of mandrel 20 so as to prevent mandrel 20 from being in contact with the inner surface of stent 15. Alternatively, in other embodiments, mandrel 20 can be free of support elements 22 so that the stent is supported by and in contact with mandrel 20.
Additionally, support elements 22 are sized smaller than the inner diameter of stent 15 so as to provide for minimum contact between support elements 22 and the inner surface of stent 15. In the case of a mandrel 20 free of support elements 22, mandrel 22 is sized smaller than the inner diameter of stent 15.
Support elements 22 of small diameter, as compared to the inner diameter of stent 10, results in an axis xM about which support elements 22 rotate, that is offset from an axis xS, about which stent 15 rotates. Axis xS is positioned longitudinally through the center of stent 15. Since support elements 22 and stent 15 rotate about different axes, xM and xS, support elements 22 and stent 15 do not have a 1:1 rotation. Thus, the contact points or area between support 22 and stent 15 continuously change. However, coating material can cause stent 15 to stick to support elements 22, resulting in a stationary contact point.
Sticking of stent 15 to support elements 22 is reduced or prevented by pulsing the rotation rate of mandrel 20 and elements 22. The pulses in rotation rate cause a stent that is stuck to one or both of support elements 22 to break free and resume rotation about axis xS with continuously changing contact points.
Numerous variations of the form of a pulse that could break a stent free are possible.
In
The pulses can be performed at a specified frequency during the coating process to reduce or eliminate sticking of the stent that can occur. The frequency can be greater than 0.1 Hz, 0.5 Hz, 1 Hz, 3 Hz, or more narrowly 5 Hz. Alternatively, the pulses can be performed at irregular or unequal intervals.
A pulse causes a rotation of elements 22 relative to stent 15. The relative rotation caused by an increase in rate from R1 to R2 can be greater than 10°, 30°, 45°, 90°, or 270°. The amount of rotation can be controlled by the maximum rate of the pulse, the degree of acceleration, and the duration of the pulse. It is believed that the higher rate R2 or degree of acceleration, the greater is the relative rotation of elements 22 to stent 15.
Support elements 42 and 44 can connect to motors 46 and 48, respectively, which provide rotational motion to support elements 42 and 44, as depicted by arrows 50 and 52, during the coating process. Motors 46 and 48 are also capable of providing rotational pulses for shifting contact points, as described below. Motors 54 and 56 can also be provided for providing pulses to support elements 42 and 44 in a linear direction along rails 58 and 60, respectively. Motors 54 and 56 are also used to position support elements 42 and 44 relative to one another. Another motor (not shown) can also be provided to move assembly 40 and thus stent 45 in a linear direction, back and forth, during coating.
Support elements 42 and 44 can be positioned by motors 54 and 56, respectively, so that support elements 42 and 44 and stent 45 have the same or substantially the same axes of rotation. Opposing forces exerted from support elements 42 and 44, for securely pinching stent 45 against support elements 42 and 44, should be sufficiently strong so as to prevent any significant movement of stent 45 on mounting assembly 40. The forces can be sufficiently strong so that there is a 1:1 rotation of stent 45 with support elements 42 and 44.
However, the exerted force should not compress stent 45 so as to distort the body of stent 45. Over or under application of support force can lead to problems such as stent 45 resting too loosely on mounting assembly 20, stent 45 bending, opposing ends of stent 45 flaring on support elements 42 and 44, and increased contact between stent 10 and support elements 42 and 44, all of which can lead to coating defects.
Additionally, stent 45 can be disposed loose enough on support elements 42 or 44 so that there is not 1:1 rotation between stent 45 and support elements 42 or 44. Support elements 42 and 44 can be positioned relative to one another so that stent 45 has an axis of rotation different from an axis of rotation of the support elements. In this case, the contact points or area between support elements 42 and 44 and stent 10 continuously change.
When there is 1:1 rotation between a support element and the stent, contact points between the support and the stent tend not to change if the rotation rate of elements 42 and 44 are the same. As discussed above, contact points that do not change for all or a substantial part of the coating process can lead to coating defects. A shift in contact points during coating can reduce or eliminate defects due to contact points during coating. Providing a rotational pulse to a support element can shift the contact points between the support element and the stent. Contact points that are uncovered due to a shift may then be covered by coating material. A repeated shifting of contact points during coating tends to allow coating material to cover defects or uncoated regions caused by contact points during the coating process.
Motor 46 can rotate support element 42 at the same or different rate as motor 48 rotates support element 44. Thus, motor 46 and motor 48 can provide rotational pulses independent of one another to support elements 42 and 44, respectively, to shift contact points between stent 45 and support elements 42 and 44. The pulses can take the form of those shown in
The pulses can be performed at a specified frequency during the coating to reduce or eliminate the defects caused by contact points. A pulse rotates elements 42 or 44 relative to stent 45 resulting in different contact points after the pulse. As above, the relative rotation can be greater than 10°, 30°, 45°, 90°, or 270°. The degree of rotation can be controlled by the maximum rate of the pulse, the degree of acceleration, and the duration of the pulse.
When stent 45 is loosely supported on support elements 42 and 44 so that there is not a 1:1 rotation, rotational pulses can reduce or prevent sticking of stent 45 to support elements 42. Sticking can also be reduced or prevented by rotating support elements 42 and 44 at different rates. Rotating support elements 42 and 44 at different rates can reduce or prevent sticking of the ends of stent 10 to elements 42 or 44. The difference in torque at the different ends of stent 10 causes the slower end to pull back on the faster end and the faster end to pull forward on the slower end to reduce or prevent sticking or to break free an end that is sticking. The difference in torque between elements 42 and 44 should be small enough so as not to cause excessive flexure to the stent.
Contact points between stent 45 and support elements 42 and 44 can be shifted by pulsing support elements 42 and 44 in a linear direction. Sticking of stent 45 to support elements 42 or 44 can also be reduced or prevented by linear pulses. Motor 54 or motor 56 can provide linear pulses independent of one another to support elements 42 and 44, respectively. A linear pulse involves an axial translation of support elements 42 or 44 by motors 54 or 56, respectively.
Motors 54 or 56 can pulse support elements 42 or 44, respectively, either inward toward stent 45 or outward away from stent 45. A representative linear pulse showing linear translation rate versus time is depicted in
Pulses or a suitable combination of pulses can cause axial translation of supports 42 and 44 with respect to stent 45 in a number of ways.
The linear pulses tend to reduce or prevent sticking of the stent to support element 42 or 44. When support element 42 or 44 is translated inward toward the stent, the stent tends to slide or ride upward along the upper tapered portion of support element 42 or 43. Similarly, when support element 42 or 44 is translated outward away from the stent, the stent tends to slide or ride downward along the upper tapered portion of support element 42 or 44.
In further embodiments, assembly 40 can include only one rotatable support element, e.g., support element 42, with the opposing support element being rotationally fixed. An end of stent 45 can fit loosely over an opposing support element so that there is not a 1:1 rotation of stent 45 with the support element. Such a support element can have a variety of shapes including those pictured in
A support element 308 and a support element 310 are coupled to rotary spindle 304 and rotary spindle 306, respectively. Rotary spindles 304 and 306 can rotate support elements 308 and 310, and thus, stent 302 supported by elements 308 and 310. Support element 308 supports a proximal end 309 of stent 302 and support 310 supports a distal end 311 of stent 302. Rotary spindles 304 and 306 are each connected to motors (not shown) which provide rotational motion to support elements 308 and 310 and to stent 302. The rotational motors are also capable of providing rotational pulses, as described above. Additionally, rotary spindles 304 and 306 are also connected to linear motors (not shown) for positioning support elements 308 and 310 relative to one another and for providing translational pulses to support elements 308 and 310 in a linear or axial direction. Another motor (not shown) can also be provided to move an assembly including spindles 304 and 306, and thus, stent 302 in a linear direction, back and forth, during coating.
Support element 308 includes three elongate arms 312 coupled to spindle 304 and support element 310 also includes three elongate arms 314 coupled to spindle 306. Elongate arms 312 and 314 converge inwardly to form a conical or frusto-conical shape for supporting stent 302. As depicted in
The ends of spindles 304 and 306 each have projecting portions 305 and 307. Portion 307 has an inner edge 307A, an edge 307B that tapers inward toward stent 302 to meet edge 307A, an edge 307C that tapers outward toward stent 302 to meet edge 307B. An edge 307D tapers inward toward stent 302 to meet edge 307C. Spindle 304 has corresponding elements including edge 305B, edge 305C, and edge 305D. Edge 307D has a longer a more gradual taper than edge 305D.
As shown in
Elongate arms 312 and 314 extend into and support a proximal end 309 and a distal end 311, respectively of stent 302. Each of elongate arms 312 and 314 have at least one point or area of contact with struts 302A at proximal end 309 and distal end 311, respectively. Elongate arms 312 and 314 are sized to be capable of supporting the stent, for example, so that an elongate arm can support stent 302 without passing through a narrow portion 303 of the stent pattern. Support elements 308 and 310 are positioned within ends 309 and 311 by translating the support elements with respect to each other using the linear motors mentioned above.
In one embodiment, elongate elements 312 and 314 can be rigid such that the elements exhibit no or relatively no bending while being positioned within a stent or during coating. Alternatively, elongate elements 312 or 314 can be flexible. As flexible elements 312 or 314 are positioned into an end of stent 302, the flexible elements bend inward and can exhibit an outward radial force that facilitates securing the elongate elements to stent 302.
Stent 302 can be rotated during coating by rotating rotary spindles 304 and 306 which rotate support elements 308 and 310, and thus, stent 302. Elements 308 and 310 can be positioned within ends 309 and 311 so that there is 1:1 rotation between elements 308 and 310 and stent 302. As described for elements 42 and 44 in
Providing a rotational pulse to, for example, element 308 causes a shift or change in the contact points between each of elements 312 and stent 302. Referring to
For example, for a pulse represented by
As described above, pulses can be performed at a specified frequency resulting in a change in contact points at the specified frequency. Alternatively, pulses can be performed at irregular intervals.
Similar to the embodiment in
The linear pulses tend to reduce or prevent sticking of the stent to elongate elements 312 or 314. Translation of support element 308, for example, inward toward stent 302 causes struts 302A of stent 302 to slide or ride upward along elements 312. Similarly, translation of support element 308 outward from the stent, causes struts 302A to slide or ride downward along elements 312. A representative linear pulse is shown in
Pulses or a suitable combination of pulses can cause axial translation of supports 308 and 310 with respect to stent 302 in a number of ways. As described above,
Furthermore, translational pulses of elements 308 or 310 can be performed at a specified frequency resulting in a change in contact points at the specified frequency. Alternatively, pulses can be performed at irregular intervals.
In other embodiments, assembly 300 can include an element disposed axially within stent 302 at least between support element 308 and support element 310. Alternatively, the member may extend between spindle 304 and spindle 306. The member may include, but is not limited to, a rod or wire. The member may be coupled to the support members at each end in a manner than allows independent rotation of the rotary spindles.
In additional embodiments, assembly 300 can include only one rotatable support element, e.g., support element 308, with an opposing support element being rotationally fixed. Distal end 311 of stent 302 can fit loosely over an opposing support element so that there is not a 1:1 rotation of stent 302 with the support element. Such a support element can have a variety of shapes including those pictured in
A further aspect of the present invention relates to eliminating coating defects that can result from stent contact with supports, such as mandrels, during coating. Additional embodiments of the present invention involve selectively coating portions of a stent that have no contact points.
As shown in
A masking sheath 420 is disposed over spindle 404 and can be translated axially over rotation spindle 404. A shuttle sheath 430 is positioned over support mandrel 408 which can axially translate over support mandrel 408. In a similar manner, shuttle sheath 421 is disposed over spindle 406 and shuttle sheath 431 is disposed over support mandrel 410.
Either or both rotation spindle 404 and rotation spindle 406 can be axially translated as shown by arrows 414 and 415, respectively. Prior to coating, stent 402 is loaded onto support mandrel 408 by sliding stent 402 onto support mandrel 408. Alternatively, stent 402 can also be loaded onto support mandrel 410. Prior to loading stent 402 on support mandrel 408, one or both of the rotation spindles can be axially translated to their maximum separation position or at least to a position that allows loading of stent 402.
As shown in
After positioning masking sheath 420, a coating material 425 is applied to unmasked portion 424 from a spray nozzle 427 positioned above stent 402. Stent 402 is rotated by rotation spindle 404, as shown by an arrow 426 during coating. Additionally, stent 402 is axially translated by axially translating rotation spindle 404 along with masking sheath 420, as shown by an arrow 428, during coating. Alternatively or additionally, spray nozzle 427 can be translated along unmasked portion 424.
At least one pass of spray nozzle 427 from one end of portion 424 to the other can be made over stent 402. After a desired amount of coating material is applied to unmasked portion 424, the coating applied on stent 402 is dried according to methods known to a person of skill in the art or by methods disclosed herein. Stent 402 can be dried at the same location as it is sprayed or moved to a drying station (not shown). Alternatively, the coating can be dried at the same time it is being sprayed. The spraying-drying cycle can be repeated a number of times until a desired amount of coating material has been applied to the stent.
To coat the masked portion of stent 402, stent 402 is loaded onto support mandrel 410 by axially translating support mandrel 408 toward support mandrel 410, decreasing adjustable gap 413 shown in
As shown in
In a manner similar to that described above, a masking sheath translates axially from rotation spindle 406 to mask or cover portion 436. After positioning the masking sheath, coating material 425 is applied to the unmasked portion from spray nozzle 427 positioned above stent 402. Stent 402 is rotated by rotation spindle 406 during coating. Additionally, stent 402 is axially translated by axially translating rotation spindle 406 during coating. Alternatively or additionally, spray nozzle 427 can be translated along an axis of the unmasked portion. At least one pass of spray nozzle 427 can be made over stent 402. After a desired amount of coating material is applied to the unmasked portion, the coating applied on stent 402 is dried. The spraying-drying cycle can be repeated a number of times until a desired amount of coating material has been applied to the stent.
After coating stent 402 on support mandrel 410, stent 402 is loaded back onto support mandrel 408 if it is desired to apply additional coating to portion 418. Stent 402 may be loaded back onto support mandrel 410 in a similar manner as the transfer of stent 402 from support mandrel 408 to support mandrel 410. For example, either or both of the support mandrels can be axially translated toward one another so that proximal end 402A of stent 402 engages distal end 409B of mandrel 408. Distal end 409B is tapered to facilitate engagement of stent 402 on distal end 409B. A shuttle sheath positioned over support mandrel 408 can push against stent 402 at proximal end 402B so that stent 402 is pushed off support mandrel 410 and onto support mandrel 408. The sequence of steps described above involving coating on support mandrel 408, drying the coated portion, transferring stent 402 to support mandrel 410, coating stent 402 on support mandrel 410, can be repeated a selected number of times until a specified loading of coating is applied to stent 402.
In some embodiments, support mandrels 408 and 410 could be covered, coated, or jacketed with a lubricious material, such as Teflon, to reduce or eliminate defects that could be caused by interaction of the inside diameter (ID) of stent 402 with the outside surface of the mandrels. Additionally, in one embodiment, the outside diameter of the mandrels can be sized to allow a slip or friction-fit so that there is a 1:1 rotation of stent 402 with the mandrels.
In alternative embodiments, stent 402 can be coated by sequential spray coating of any number of contactless portions of stent 402. For example, stent 402 can be disposed so that a proximal portion is over support mandrel 408 and a distal portion is over support mandrel 410 with a center portion having no contact with either mandrel.
Additional aspects of the present invention relate to devices and methods for supporting a stent during coating, processing, or handling that reduce or eliminate defects in the stent coating. Various embodiments include a system for supporting a stent having support members that contact proximal and distal portions of a stent that are connected with a connecting member that extends between the support members outside of and free of any contact with the stent.
In the exemplary embodiment depicted in
When pin 502 is retracted, a stent can be mounted by inserting a proximal end of a stent over pin 502 and a distal end of a stent over pin 504. Pin 502 is then pushed forward by the force of spring 520 to secure the stent on pins 502 and 504. Similarly, a mounted stent can be removed when pin 502 is retracted. The ability to load and unload a stent on a support with contact points limited pins 502 and 504, reduces or eliminates the potential for defects due to handling or manipulation of the stent.
A stent 532 can be mounted such that a length of stent 532 is less than a distance between collets 506 and 508 such that the stent can move from side to side during rotation. In another embodiment, a proximal end 534 and distal end 536 of stent 532 are at least partially in contact with a surface of collets 506 and 508, respectively. Collet 506 and pin 502 are positioned axially to contact stent 532 to allow a 1:1 rotation of collet 506 and stent 532. Collet 506 can have a protrusion or pin 538, as shown in
In addition to use as a support during coating, support assembly 500 can be used as a support during various portions of stent processing. Support assembly 500 can be used generally for handling or manipulating a stent between and during processing steps. Support 500 can be used in operations such as weighing, inspection, and transport. When weighing a stent, the support bar can be held by hand and the spring-loaded end-pin can be grasped by the other hand.
For example, a coated stent 532 that is to be weighed can be loaded on a weigh pan by holding stent 532 over the weigh pan, retracting spring-loaded pin 502 and allowing coated stent 532 to be placed onto the weigh pan. Retracted pin 502 is allowed to return to a relaxed position. Thus, stent 532 may be loaded on the weigh pan without any additional contact of stent 532 with support 500. When the stent weighing process (or any other process) is complete, spring-loaded pin 502 can be retracted again to allow enough space for fixed pin 504 to be placed into distal end 536 of stent 532. Spring-loaded pin 502 can then be inserted into proximal end 534 of stent 532 to secure stent 532 onto support 500 for further transport, handling, or processing.
Further aspects of the present invention relate to devices and methods for supporting a stent during coating, processing, or handling that reduce or eliminate defects in the stent coating. Various embodiments include a system for supporting a stent with reduced contact points of a support with a stent. The stent support includes a spiral coil or spiral mandrel that can be disposed within a stent to support the stent during coating.
An advantage of a support as depicted in
An example of a spiral coil support 550 depicted in
Another aspect of the present invention relates to a device that allows reduced contact area between a support for a stent and the ends of a stent during coating of the stent.
As indicated above, it is generally desirable to minimize the contact area between an end of a stent and collets 706 to reduce or prevent coating defects. Additionally, minimizing such contact area tends to reduce undesirable wicking or flow of coating material from the stent to the collets. Contact points can create defects such as uncoated or insufficiently coated areas on a stent surface. Wicking can also result in uncoated or insufficiently coated areas.
It is desirable to minimize the interface between the end of a stent and the apparatus supporting the stent end during the coating process to minimize coating defects. Accordingly, the present invention provides for a device for supporting a stent during the coating application process. The invention also provides for a method of coating the stent supported by the device.
Various embodiments of the present invention include a collet that is shaped so as to minimize contact area of a stent end with a surface of the collet. Certain embodiments of the collet have an end surface for contacting a stent end that includes a raised or projecting portion and a flat or relatively flat portion. In one embodiment, the projecting portion may have at least three segments radiating from a center to the edge of the surface. The thickness of the segments in a plane of the surface may decrease from the center to the edge of the surface. Additionally, a height of the projecting portion perpendicular to the surface may decrease from the center of the surface to the edge.
Body section 714 has slots 715 running parallel to an axis of body section 714. Slots 715 are designed to allow collet 710 to engage and couple to a rotatable spindle or other support structure. In one embodiment, body section 714 has six slots 715 spaced 60° apart. In other embodiments, body section 714 has seven, eight, nine, or ten slots.
In some embodiments, a radius of collet 710 may be sized so that stent ends are in contact with segments 724 near the edge of the surface of the end of collet 710. Segments 724 are relatively thin near the edge of the surface resulting in a relatively small contact area of the stent end with the collet. Thus, wicking of coating material from the stent to collet 710 is relatively low or nonexistent. Also, defects due to contact of the stent with collet 710 tend to be reduced or eliminated. Additionally, the decrease in height outward from the center tends to allow the stent to center itself on the surface which results in a consistent contact area between the stent and collet 710.
An example of collet 710 depicted in
Another aspect of the present invention relates to a method and device that reduces operator or machinery contact with a mandrel that supports a stent during processing. Stent handling or manipulation, whether manual or automated, risks exposing a stent to damage and/or contamination with undesired impurities. Embodiments of the present invention tend to reduce or eliminate damage to a stent and/or stent coating that may be caused by handling or manipulation of a stent during processing. Damage can result from contaminants or undesired contact with surfaces. Such embodiments also reduce or eliminate damage resulting from exposure to a stent to undesired contaminants.
As described above, coating a stent requires a number of processing steps which involve handling and manipulation of a stent. The process involving application of a coating, a drug-polymer coating, for example, may include loading or mounting a stent on a mandrel. A conventional mandrel for supporting a stent during processing is coupled mechanically through direct or indirect physical contact to fixtures and/or rotatable spindles. For example, mandrel 702 in
Furthermore, as discussed above, a coating is typically applied in stages with a drying step in between stages. The application step and drying step are repeated until a desired weight or loading of coating on the stent is achieved. After some or all of the drying steps, the stent may be weighed. When the application-drying stages are completed, the stent is typically dried in an oven to remove all or substantially all of the solvent remaining in the coating.
In conventional coating systems, the above-described procedure can require handling and manipulation of a mandrel holding the stent. For instance, after application of a coating layer, the mandrel may be moved to a drying station. The drying station, for example, may include a nozzle blowing a stream of heated gas on the coated stent. A stent may be transferred to an oven for a drying, which can be the final drying step. In addition, after one or more of the drying steps, a stent may be transferred to a weighing station, unloaded from a mandrel, and transferred to a scale for weighing. During each of these handling or manipulation procedures, the stent and/or stent coating can be damaged through contact with surfaces or exposure to undesired substances.
Embodiments of a system including a mandrel that can support a stent without physical or mechanical contact with other machines or devices during processing are described herein. In some embodiments, the mandrel can contact, hold, translate and/or rotate a stent. Limited operator or machinery contact with the mandrel reduces or eliminates damage or defects to a stent and/or stent coating that occur during processing. The mandrel of the system is supported, translated, and/or rotated through magnetic levitation.
Mandrel 752 includes permanent magnets 758 embedded within a proximal and a distal end of mandrel 752. “Permanent magnets” refer to materials that possess a magnetic field which is not generated by outside influences such as electricity. In some embodiments, mandrel 752 can include magnets 758 in only one end of mandrel 752. In other embodiments, magnets 758 can be embedded or disposed at other positions along mandrel 752.
As shown in
System 750 further includes electromagnetic coils 760, 761, and 762 positioned adjacent to mandrel 752. Coils 760, 761, and 762 are electrically connected to an electromagnetic power supply 764 which provides power to coils 760, 761, and 762 to generate an electrical field. Electromagnetic coils 760 and 761, for example, generate an electrical field that allows the magnets 758 to support or levitate mandrel 752 without the physical contact with fixtures or members such as members 706 and 708 in
Power supply 764 further includes polarity switching equipment. The polarity switching equipment induces polarity changes in the electromagnetic field generated by coils 760, 761, and 762 in a way that induces movement of magnets 758 to move mandrel 752 in a selected manner. For example, coils 760 and 762 can induce rotation of mandrel 752 as shown by an arrow 764 to rotate a stent during application of coating material to the stent. Also, coils 762 can induce translation of mandrel 752 as shown by an arrow 766.
In additional embodiments, a coating system can use magnetic levitation to rotate or translate a stent during or between processing steps.
After application of a coating layer at station 802, the stent can be transferred to a drying station 804 that includes a nozzle that blows a stream of heated gas on the coated stent. The stent can be translated to and from station 802 and station 804 as shown by arrows 812 and 813 using magnetic levitation induced by coils 810 than run between the stations.
Additionally, the stent can be transferred to a drying station 808 for a final drying step. Drying station 808 may include an oven for drying the stent. The stent can be translated from station 802 to station 808 as shown by an arrow 814 using magnetic levitation induced by coils 816 than run between the stations.
A stent mounted on the mandrel can also be translated, as shown by an arrow 818, using magnetic levitation induced by coils 820 from station 804 to a weighing station 806 after the coating on the stent is dried at station 804. After weighing the stent at weigh station 806, the stent can then be translated back to coating station 802, as shown by an arrow 822, using magnetic levitation induced by coils 824. In addition, the stent can also be translated, as shown by an arrow 826, using magnetic levitation induced by coils 828 from station 808 to weighing station 806 after the coating on the stent is dried at station 808.
In other embodiments, a stent loaded on a magnetic mandrel can be translated to other processing stations or steps than those depicted in
It is important to control the raw material purity of coating polymers for medical devices such as stents. A potential problem with polymers used in coating applications of stents is that such polymers can contain impurities that trigger adverse biological responses to the stent when implanted into a biological lumen. The polymers can contain impurities such as catalysts, initiators, processing aids, suspension aids, unreacted monomers, and oligomers, or other low molecular weight species, even though the polymer is sold as a “medical grade” polymer by the manufacturer. Thus, there tends to be a need to purify polymers used in coating applications. Various embodiments of the present invention relate to purifying such polymers.
It is desirable that after a polymer has been purified for the polymer to be substantially biologically inert. “Purified” refers to a polymer that has had impurities removed or significantly reduced. “Impurities” refer to traces of catalysts, initiators, processing aids, suspension aids, unreacted monomers, and oligomers, or other low molecular weight species, or any other chemical remaining in the polymer, that can cause or effectuate an adverse biological response greater than which would occur if the impurity is removed or significantly reduced. For example, “medical grade” poly(n-butyl methacrylate) (PBMA) can contain impurities such as suspension aids (e.g., starch) and unreacted monomers.
“Biologically inert” refers to a material that does not elicit a significantly greater adverse biological response than a biocompatible material, such as stainless steel, when implanted into a body vessel. Examples of biocompatible materials include metals such as stainless steel, titanium, and Nitinol, and organic materials such as collagen, fibronectin, polyethylene glycol, polysaccharides, TEFLON, silicone and polyurethane.
The coating for a stent including the purified polymer can have a drug-polymer layer, an optional topcoat layer, and an optional primer layer. The drug-polymer layer can be applied directly onto the stent surface to serve as a reservoir for a therapeutically active agent or drug which is incorporated into the drug-polymer layer. The topcoat layer, which can be essentially free from any therapeutic substances or drugs, serves as a rate limiting membrane for controlling the rate of release of the drug. The optional primer layer can be applied between the stent and the drug-polymer layer to improve the adhesion of the drug-polymer layer to the stent.
In one embodiment, poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropene) copolymer (PVDF-HFP) (e.g., SOLEF 21508, available from Solvay Solexis PVDF, Thorofare, N.J.), can be used as a polymer for a drug-polymer layer or matrix. Polybutyl methacrylate (PBMA) can be used as the primer to improve adhesion between the metallic stent and the drug-polymer layer or matrix.
By using the methods described herein, the polymer for the drug-polymer layer can be purified to remove a significant amount of residual catalysts, initiators, processing aids, suspension aids, unreacted monomers, and oligomers or other low molecular weight species. Certain embodiments of a method of purifying a polymer mass may include washing the polymer mass with a solvent that dissolves an impurity, but not the polymer. The impurities, such as low molecular species including unreacted monomers and oligomers, should be miscible or substantially miscible in the solvent, while the polymer should be immiscible or substantially immiscible in the solvent.
In some embodiments, it may be advantageous for a solvent for use in purifying PVDF-HFP to have the following properties: (1) capable of swelling, but not dissolving PVDF-HFP; (2) capable of dissolving contaminants such as mineral oil; (3) the boiling temperature is low enough so that a solvent-washed polymer can be dried without using a convection oven; and (4) safety—Class III or Class II on the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Guidance list.
Representative examples of some solvents that may be used to purify PVDF-HFP include, but are not limited to, acetonitrile (ACN), isopropyl alcohol (IPA), methyl acetate (MA), ethyl acetate (EA), isopropyl acetate (ISPA), propyl acetate (PA), and mixtures of ethyl acetate and ethanol. The suitability of the above solvents for purifying PVDF-HFP can be evaluated by measuring the swelling of PVDF-HFP and the removal of contaminants from PVDF-HFP. The above-listed solvents were pre-screened by examining the physical parameters listed in Table 3.
Based on the pre-screening data listed in the above table, the following solvents were selected for further study of the swell parameters of PVDF-HFP. These include 1) ACN; 2) IPA; 3) EA; 4) ISPA 5) EA/EtOH (75/25).
The swelling of PVDF-HFP was determined as a function of time. Two methods were used to measure the PVDF-HFP swell ratio in the solvents: size measurement and weight measurement. Prior to contacting a sample of PVDF-HFP with a solvent, a sample pellet of PVDF-HFP was weighed and pictures were taken by a light microscope. The diameter of the pellet was measured from the digital image. This measured diameter is the data for time zero.
The sample pellet was then placed into a vial containing about 5 grams of a selected solvent and shaken on a shaker table at 480 rpm. At selected time intervals, the pellet was taken out for weight and size measurement. By comparing the weight and size of the same pellet at the selected time intervals, the swell parameters of PVDF-HFP in different solvents were calculated.
The removal of contaminants was studied by analyzing an extraction phase. The extraction phase refers to the mixture of the solvent and any impurities or contaminants removed or extracted from the swelled sample polymer. The extraction phase of acetonitrile, isopropyl acetate, and propyl acetate was analyzed. The extraction phase was blow-dried with a stream of heated gas. The residual remaining after the extraction phase was blow-dried included contaminants extracted from the polymer sample. The residual was analyzed by Gel Permeation Chromotography (GPC) analysis. Acetone was used to dissolve the residual impurities or contaminants for the GPC injection. A person of ordinary skill in the art is familiar with the principles of GPC analysis.
The acetonitrile extracted more residual than either isopropyl acetate or propyl acetate. Table 4 lists the results of the GPC analysis of the residual for each solvent. In Table 4, the “retention time” is the characteristic time of passage of a component through a GPC system. For the extracts from acetonitrile, a large peak retention time of 19 minutes overwrote other small insignificant peaks. For the extracted residual from isopropyl acetate and propyl acetate, the results showed a mixture of small molecular weight and large molecular weight material. The large molecular weight material corresponds to the molecular weight of PVDF-HFP, which is about 280K.
Generally, it is desirable to use a solvent to purify PVDF-HVP that (1) swells and extracts a substantial amount of low molecular weight materials from the polymer and that (2) dissolves as little as possible of the polymer. The data indicates that isopropyl acetate has a favorable balance of swelling and extraction with dissolution of the polymer.
The polymer sample purified by the isopropyl acetate was analyzed after extraction to determine drying time. The polymer sample was dried in a convection oven at three different temperatures. The change in weight was determined using Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA). Table 5 summarizes the results from TGA. The data in Table 3 indicate that drying at 85° C. or 90° C. for 24 hours will remove the solvent to an acceptable level.
A non-polymer substrate for a coating of an implantable medical device may be made of a metallic material or an alloy such as, but not limited to, cobalt chromium alloy (ELGILOY), stainless steel (316L), high nitrogen stainless steel, e.g., BIODUR 108, cobalt chrome alloy L-605, “MP35N,” “MP20N,” ELASTINITE (Nitinol), tantalum, nickel-titanium alloy, platinum-iridium alloy, gold, magnesium, or combinations thereof. “MP35N” and “MP20N” are trade names for alloys of cobalt, nickel, chromium and molybdenum available from Standard Press Steel Co., Jenkintown, Pa. “MP35N” consists of 35% cobalt, 35% nickel, 20% chromium, and 10% molybdenum. “MP20N” consists of 50% cobalt, 20% nickel, 20% chromium, and 10% molybdenum.
In accordance with one embodiment, the composition can include a solvent and a polymer dissolved in the solvent and optionally a wetting fluid. The composition can also include active agents, radiopaque elements, or radioactive isotopes. Representative examples of polymers that may be used as a substrate of a stent or coating for a stent, or more generally, implantable medical devices include, but are not limited to, poly(N-acetylglucosamine) (Chitin), Chitosan, poly(3-hydroxyvalerate), poly(lactide-co-glycolide), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate), poly(4-hydroxybutyrate), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate), polyorthoester, polyanhydride, poly(glycolic acid), poly(glycolide), poly(L-lactic acid), poly(L-lactide), poly(D,L-lactic acid), poly(D,L-lactide), poly(L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide), poly(caprolactone), poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone), poly(D,L-lactide-co-caprolactone), poly(glycolide-co-caprolactone), poly(trimethylene carbonate), polyester amide, poly(glycolic acid-co-trimethylene carbonate), co-poly(ether-esters) (e.g. PEO/PLA), polyphosphazenes, biomolecules (such as fibrin, fibrinogen, cellulose, starch, collagen and hyaluronic acid), polyurethanes, silicones, polyesters, polyolefins, polyisobutylene and ethylene-alphaolefin copolymers, acrylic polymers and copolymers, vinyl halide polymers and copolymers (such as polyvinyl chloride), polyvinyl ethers (such as polyvinyl methyl ether), polyvinylidene halides (such as polyvinylidene chloride), polyacrylonitrile, polyvinyl ketones, polyvinyl aromatics (such as polystyrene), polyvinyl esters (such as polyvinyl acetate), acrylonitrile-styrene copolymers, ABS resins, polyamides (such as Nylon 66 and polycaprolactam), polycarbonates, polyoxymethylenes, polyimides, polyethers, polyurethanes, rayon, rayon-triacetate, cellulose acetate, cellulose butyrate, cellulose acetate butyrate, cellophane, cellulose nitrate, cellulose propionate, cellulose ethers, and carboxymethyl cellulose. Additional representative examples of polymers that may be especially well suited for use in fabricating embodiments of implantable medical devices disclosed herein include ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (commonly known by the generic name EVOH or by the trade name EVAL), poly(butyl methacrylate), poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropene) (e.g., SOLEF 21508, available from Solvay Solexis PVDF, Thorofare, N.J.), polyvinylidene fluoride (otherwise known as KYNAR, available from ATOFINA Chemicals, Philadelphia, Pa.), ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, poly(vinyl acetate), styrene-isobutylene-styrene triblock copolymers, and polyethylene glycol.
“Solvent” is defined as a liquid substance or composition that is compatible with the polymer and is capable of dissolving the polymer at the concentration desired in the composition. Examples of solvents include, but are not limited to, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), chloroform, acetone, water (buffered saline), xylene, methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, tetrahydrofuran, 1-butanone, dimethylformamide, dimethylacetamide, cyclohexanone, ethyl acetate, methylethylketone, propylene glycol monomethylether, isopropanol, isopropanol admixed with water, N-methylpyrrolidinone, toluene, and combinations thereof.
A “wetting” of a fluid is measured by the fluid's capillary permeation. Capillary permeation is the movement of a fluid on a solid substrate driven by interfacial energetics. Capillary permeation is quantified by a contact angle, defined as an angle at the tangent of a droplet in a fluid phase that has taken an equilibrium shape on a solid surface. A low contact angle means a higher wetting liquid. A suitably high capillary permeation corresponds to a contact angle less than about 90°. Representative examples of the wetting fluid include, but are not limited to, tetrahydrofuran (THF), dimethylformamide (DMF), 1-butanol, n-butyl acetate, dimethylacetamide (DMAC), and mixtures and combinations thereof.
Examples of radiopaque elements include, but are not limited to, gold, tantalum, and platinum. An example of a radioactive isotope is p32. Sufficient amounts of such substances may be dispersed in the composition such that the substances are not present in the composition as agglomerates or flocs.
Examples of active agents include antiproliferative substances such as actinomycin D, or derivatives and analogs thereof (manufactured by Sigma-Aldrich 1001 West Saint Paul Avenue, Milwaukee, Wis. 53233; or COSMEGEN available from Merck). Synonyms of actinomycin D include dactinomycin, actinomycin IV, actinomycin I1, actinomycin X1, and actinomycin C1. The bioactive agent can also fall under the genus of antineoplastic, anti-inflammatory, antiplatelet, anticoagulant, antifibrin, antithrombin, antimitotic, antibiotic, antiallergic and antioxidant substances. Examples of such antineoplastics and/or antimitotics include paclitaxel, (e.g., TAXOL® by Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Stamford, Conn.), docetaxel (e.g., Taxotere®, from Aventis S. A., Frankfurt, Germany), methotrexate, azathioprine, vincristine, vinblastine, fluorouracil, doxorubicin hydrochloride (e.g., Adriamycin® from Pharmacia & Upjohn, Peapack N.J.), and mitomycin (e.g., Mutamycin® from Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Stamford, Conn.). Examples of such antiplatelets, anticoagulants, antifibrin, and antithrombins include aspirin, sodium heparin, low molecular weight heparins, heparinoids, hirudin, argatroban, forskolin, vapiprost, prostacyclin and prostacyclin analogues, dextran, D-phe-pro-arg-chloromethylketone (synthetic antithrombin), dipyridamole, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet membrane receptor antagonist antibody, recombinant hirudin, and thrombin inhibitors such as Angiomax ä (Biogen, Inc., Cambridge, Mass.). Examples of such cytostatic or antiproliferative agents include angiopeptin, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors such as captopril (e.g., Capoten® and Capozide® from Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Stamford, Conn.), cilazapril or lisinopril (e.g., Prinivil® and Prinzide® from Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, N.J.), calcium channel blockers (such as nifedipine), colchicine, proteins, peptides, fibroblast growth factor (FGF) antagonists, fish oil (omega 3-fatty acid), histamine antagonists, lovastatin (an inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, a cholesterol lowering drug, brand name Mevacor® from Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, N.J.), monoclonal antibodies (such as those specific for Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (PDGF) receptors), nitroprusside, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, prostaglandin inhibitors, suramin, serotonin blockers, steroids, thioprotease inhibitors, triazolopyrimidine (a PDGF antagonist), and nitric oxide. An example of an antiallergic agent is permirolast potassium. Other therapeutic substances or agents which may be appropriate agents include cisplatin, insulin sensitizers, receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, carboplatin, alpha-interferon, genetically engineered epithelial cells, steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, antivirals, anticancer drugs, anticoagulant agents, free radical scavengers, estradiol, antibiotics, nitric oxide donors, super oxide dismutases, super oxide dismutases mimics, 4-amino-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (4-amino-TEMPO), tacrolimus, dexamethasone, ABT-578, clobetasol, cytostatic agents, prodrugs thereof, co-drugs thereof, and a combination thereof. Other therapeutic substances or agents may include rapamycin and structural derivatives or functional analogs thereof, such as 40-O-(2-hydroxy)ethyl-rapamycin (known by the trade name of EVEROLIMUS), 40-O-(3-hydroxy)propyl-rapamycin, 40-O-[2-(2-hydroxy)ethoxy]ethyl-rapamycin, methyl rapamycin, and 40-O-tetrazole-rapamycin.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications can be made without departing from this invention in its broader aspects. Therefore, the appended claims are to encompass within their scope all such changes and modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope of this invention.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/418,722, filed on May 4, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,003,156, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2072303 | Herrmann et al. | Mar 1937 | A |
| 2386454 | Frosch et al. | Oct 1945 | A |
| 2647017 | Coulliette | Jul 1953 | A |
| 2701559 | Cooper | Feb 1955 | A |
| 2845346 | Scanlon et al. | Jul 1958 | A |
| 3016875 | Ballentine, Jr. et al. | Jan 1962 | A |
| 3288728 | Gorham | Nov 1966 | A |
| 3419062 | Cornelis | Dec 1968 | A |
| 3687135 | Stroganov et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3773737 | Goodman et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3827139 | Norteman | Aug 1974 | A |
| 3839743 | Schwarcz | Oct 1974 | A |
| 3849514 | Gray, Jr. et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
| 3882816 | Rooz et al. | May 1975 | A |
| 3900632 | Robinson | Aug 1975 | A |
| 3995075 | Cernauskas et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4011388 | Murphy et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4075045 | Rideout | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4082212 | Headrick et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4104410 | Malecki | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4110497 | Hoel | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4132357 | Blackinton | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4164524 | Ward et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
| 4201149 | Koester et al. | May 1980 | A |
| 4226243 | Shalaby et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4269713 | Yamashita et al. | May 1981 | A |
| 4290383 | Pfender | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4321711 | Mano | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4323071 | Simpson et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4329383 | Joh | May 1982 | A |
| 4338942 | Fogarty | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4343931 | Barrows | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4346028 | Griffith | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4439185 | Lundquist | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4459252 | MacGregor | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4489670 | Mosser et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4516972 | Samson et al. | May 1985 | A |
| 4529792 | Barrows | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4538622 | Samson et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4554929 | Samson et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4560374 | Hammerslag | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4573470 | Samson et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4596574 | Urist | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4599085 | Riess et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4608984 | Fogarty | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4611051 | Hayes et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4612009 | Drobnik et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4616593 | Kawamura et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4616652 | Simpson | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4629563 | Wrasidlo | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4633873 | Dumican et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4638805 | Powell | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4640846 | Kuo | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4656083 | Hoffman et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4656242 | Swan et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4699611 | Bowden | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4702252 | Brooks et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4718907 | Karwoski et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4722335 | Vilasi | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4723549 | Wholey et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4732152 | Wallstén et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4733665 | Palmaz | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4739762 | Palmaz | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4740207 | Kreamer | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4743252 | Martin, Jr. et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4748982 | Horzewski et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4762128 | Rosenbluth | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4768507 | Fischell et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4774039 | Wrasidlo | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4776337 | Palmaz | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4798585 | Inoue et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4800882 | Gianturco | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4816339 | Tu et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4818559 | Hama et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4822535 | Ekman et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4828561 | Woodroof | May 1989 | A |
| 4839055 | Ishizaki et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4846791 | Hattler et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4850999 | Planck | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4865870 | Hu et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4865879 | Finlay | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4871542 | Vilhardt | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4877030 | Beck et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4878906 | Lindemann et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4879135 | Greco et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4880683 | Stow | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4882168 | Casey et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4886062 | Wiktor | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4893623 | Rosenbluth | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4902289 | Yannas | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4906423 | Frisch | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4931287 | Bae et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4932353 | Kawata et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4941870 | Okada et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4943346 | Mattelin | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4950227 | Savin et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4955899 | Della Corna et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4967606 | Wells et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4976736 | White et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4977901 | Ofstead | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4988356 | Crittenden et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4992312 | Frisch | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4994033 | Shockey et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4994298 | Yasuda | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4994560 | Kruper, Jr. et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5015505 | Cetnar | May 1991 | A |
| 5017420 | Marikar | May 1991 | A |
| 5019090 | Pinchuk | May 1991 | A |
| 5019096 | Fox, Jr. et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5028597 | Kodama et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5033405 | Yamada et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5037392 | Hillstead | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5037427 | Harada et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5040548 | Yock | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5047050 | Arpesani | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5049132 | Shaffer et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5053048 | Pinchuk | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5059166 | Fischell | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5059169 | Zilber | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5059211 | Stack et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5062829 | Pryor et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5064435 | Porter | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5078720 | Burton et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5081394 | Morishita et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5084065 | Weldon et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5085629 | Goldberg et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5087244 | Wolinsky et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5087394 | Keith | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5100429 | Sinofsky et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5100992 | Cohn et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5102402 | Dror et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5104410 | Chowdhary | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5108416 | Ryan et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5108417 | Sawyer | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5108755 | Daniels et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5112457 | Marchant | May 1992 | A |
| 5116318 | Hillstead | May 1992 | A |
| 5116365 | Hillstead | May 1992 | A |
| 5123917 | Lee | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5127362 | Iwatsu et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5133742 | Pinchuk | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5134192 | Feijen et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5147370 | McNamara et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5156623 | Hakamatsuka et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5156911 | Stewart | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5158548 | Lau et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5163951 | Pinchuk et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5163952 | Froix | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5163958 | Pinchuk | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5165919 | Sasaki et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5167614 | Tessmann et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5171445 | Zepf | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5176638 | Don Michael | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5188734 | Zepf | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5192311 | King et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5197977 | Hoffman, Jr. et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5201314 | Bosley et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5205822 | Johnson et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5213561 | Weinstein et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5213576 | Abiuso et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5219980 | Swidler | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5222971 | Willard et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5225750 | Higuchi et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5226889 | Sheiban | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5226913 | Pinchuk | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5229045 | Soldani | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5229172 | Cahalan et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5232444 | Just et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5234456 | Silvestrini | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5234457 | Andersen | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5236447 | Kubo et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5242399 | Lau et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5254089 | Wang | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5254091 | Aliahmad et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5258020 | Froix | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5258419 | Rolando et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5264246 | Ikeno | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5269802 | Garber | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5272012 | Opolski | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5278200 | Coury et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5279594 | Jackson | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5282823 | Schwartz et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5282860 | Matsuno et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5286254 | Shapland et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5289831 | Bosley | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5290271 | Jernberg | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5292516 | Viegas et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5298260 | Viegas et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5300295 | Viegas et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5304200 | Spaulding | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5306250 | March et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5306286 | Stack et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5306294 | Winston et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5306501 | Viegas et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5306786 | Moens et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5308338 | Helfrich | May 1994 | A |
| 5308641 | Cahalan et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5314472 | Fontaine | May 1994 | A |
| 5318531 | Leone | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5328471 | Slepian | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5330500 | Song | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5330768 | Park et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5336518 | Narayanan et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5342283 | Good | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5342348 | Kaplan | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5342395 | Jarrett et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5342621 | Eury | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5344426 | Lau et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5344455 | Keogh et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5350800 | Verhoeven et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5356433 | Rowland et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5358740 | Bornside et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5360401 | Turnland et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5360443 | Barone et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5364354 | Walker et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5366504 | Andersen et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5368560 | Rambo et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5370684 | Vallana et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5378511 | Cardinali et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5380299 | Fearnot et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5383925 | Schmitt | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5383927 | DeGoicoechea et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5385580 | Schmitt | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5387450 | Stewart | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5389106 | Tower | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5399666 | Ford | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5405472 | Leone | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5409495 | Osborn | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5411466 | Hess | May 1995 | A |
| 5411477 | Saab | May 1995 | A |
| 5412035 | Schmitt et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5415938 | Cahalan et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5417981 | Endo et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5421955 | Lau et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5423849 | Engelson et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5423885 | Williams | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5429618 | Keogh | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5441515 | Khosravi et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5443458 | Eury et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5443496 | Schwartz et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5443500 | Sigwart | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5445646 | Euteneuer et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5447724 | Helmus et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5451233 | Yock | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5455040 | Marchant | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5456661 | Narciso, Jr. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5456713 | Chuter | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5458615 | Klemm et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5458683 | Taylor et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5460610 | Don Michael | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5462990 | Hubbell et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5464450 | Buscemi et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5464650 | Berg et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5470313 | Crocker et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5470603 | Staniforth et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5476476 | Hillstead | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5476509 | Keogh et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5485496 | Lee et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5496346 | Horzewski et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5500013 | Buscemi et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5501227 | Yock | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5502158 | Sinclair et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5507768 | Lau et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5511726 | Greenspan et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5514154 | Lau et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5514379 | Weissleder et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5516560 | Harayama et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5516881 | Lee et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5527337 | Stack et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5537729 | Kolobow | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5538493 | Gerken et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5545209 | Roberts et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5545408 | Trigg et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5551954 | Buscemi et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5554120 | Chen et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5554182 | Dinh et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5556413 | Lam | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5558642 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5558900 | Fan et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5562728 | Lazarus et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5569295 | Lam | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5569463 | Helmus et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5571135 | Fraser et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5571166 | Dinh et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5571567 | Shah | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5578046 | Liu et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5578048 | Pasqualucci et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5578073 | Haimovich et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5584877 | Miyake et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5588962 | Nicholas et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5591199 | Porter et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5591224 | Schwartz et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5591227 | Dinh et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5591607 | Gryaznov et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5593403 | Buscemi | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5593434 | Williams | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5595722 | Grainger et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5599301 | Jacobs et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5599307 | Bacher et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5599352 | Dinh et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5599922 | Gryaznov et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5603721 | Lau et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5605696 | Eury et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5607442 | Fischell et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5607467 | Froix | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5609629 | Fearnot et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5610241 | Lee et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5611775 | Machold et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5616338 | Fox, Jr. et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5618298 | Simon | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5618299 | Khosravi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5620420 | Kriesel | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5624411 | Tuch | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5628730 | Shapland et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5628755 | Heller et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5628781 | Williams et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5628785 | Schwartz et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5628786 | Banas et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5629077 | Turnlund et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5631135 | Gryaznov et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5632771 | Boatman et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5632840 | Campbell | May 1997 | A |
| 5637113 | Tartaglia et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5642571 | Park | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5643580 | Subramaniam | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5644020 | Timmermann et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5645559 | Hachtman et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5649951 | Davidson | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5649977 | Campbell | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5653691 | Rupp et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5656080 | Staniforth et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5656082 | Takatsuki et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5658995 | Kohn et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5667523 | Bynon et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5667767 | Greff et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5667796 | Otten | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5670558 | Onishi et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5674242 | Phan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5679400 | Tuch | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5687906 | Nakagawa | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5693085 | Buirge et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5693376 | Fetherston et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5695498 | Tower | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5695810 | Dubin et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5697967 | Dinh et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5700286 | Tartaglia et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5702754 | Zhong | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5702818 | Cahalan et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5707385 | Williams | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5711763 | Nonami et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5711812 | Chapek et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5711958 | Cohn et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5713949 | Jayaraman | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5716981 | Hunter et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5718726 | Amon et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5720726 | Marcadis et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5721131 | Rudolph et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5722984 | Fischell et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5723219 | Kolluri et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5725549 | Lam | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5726297 | Gryaznov et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5728068 | Leone et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5728751 | Patnaik | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5730698 | Fischell et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5733326 | Tomonto et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5733327 | Igaki et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5733330 | Cox | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5733564 | Lehtinen | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5733925 | Kunz et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5735897 | Buirge | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5741554 | Tisone | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5741881 | Patnaik | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5746745 | Abele et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5746998 | Torchilin et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5756457 | Wang et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5756476 | Epstein et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5756553 | Iguchi et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5759205 | Valentini | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5759474 | Rupp et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5765682 | Bley et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5766204 | Porter et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5766239 | Cox | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5766710 | Turnlund et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5769883 | Buscemi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5769884 | Solovay | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5770609 | Grainger et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5772864 | M.o slashed.ller et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5776184 | Tuch | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5780807 | Saunders | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5782742 | Crocker et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5783657 | Pavlin et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5788626 | Thompson | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5788979 | Alt et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5800392 | Racchini | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5800516 | Fine et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5804318 | Pinchuk et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5807244 | Barot | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5810871 | Tuckey et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5810873 | Morales | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5811151 | Hendriks et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5811447 | Kunz et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5820917 | Tuch | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5823996 | Sparks | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5824048 | Tuch | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5824049 | Ragheb et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5824056 | Rosenberg | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5826586 | Mishra et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5830178 | Jones et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5830179 | Mikus et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5830217 | Ryan | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5830461 | Billiar | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5830879 | Isner | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5833644 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5833651 | Donovan et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5833659 | Kranys | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5834582 | Sinclair et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5836962 | Gianotti | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5836965 | Jendersee et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5837008 | Berg et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5837313 | Ding et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5837835 | Gryaznov et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5840009 | Fischell et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5840083 | Braach-Maksvytis | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5843033 | Ropiak | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5843119 | Schulewitz | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5843172 | Yan | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5846247 | Unsworth et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5849859 | Acemoglu | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5851508 | Greff et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5853408 | Muni | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5854207 | Lee et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5854376 | Higashi | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5855598 | Pinchuk | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5855612 | Ohthuki et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5855618 | Patnaik et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5855684 | Bergmann | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5857998 | Barry | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5858556 | Eckhart et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5858746 | Hubbell et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5858990 | Walsh | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5860954 | Ropiak | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5865814 | Tuch | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5866113 | Hendriks et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5868781 | Killion | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5869127 | Zhong | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5871436 | Eury | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5871437 | Alt | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5873904 | Ragheb et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5874101 | Zhong et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5874109 | Ducheyne et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5874165 | Drumheller | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5874355 | Huang et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5876426 | Kume et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5876433 | Lunn | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5876743 | Ibsen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5877224 | Brocchini et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5877263 | Patnaik et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5879697 | Ding et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5879713 | Roth et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5883011 | Lin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5888533 | Dunn | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5891108 | Leone et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5891192 | Murayama et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5891507 | Jayaraman | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5893840 | Hull et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5893852 | Morales | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5895407 | Jayaraman | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5897911 | Loeffler | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5897955 | Drumheller | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5898178 | Bunker | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5902631 | Wang et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5902875 | Roby et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5905168 | Dos Santos et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5906759 | Richter | May 1999 | A |
| 5910564 | Gruning et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5911752 | Dustrude et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5914182 | Drumheller | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5914387 | Roby et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5916234 | Lam | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5916870 | Lee et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5919893 | Roby et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5921416 | Uehara | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5922005 | Richter et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5922393 | Jayaraman | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5925552 | Keogh et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5925720 | Kataoka et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5928279 | Shannon et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5928916 | Keogh | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5932299 | Katoot | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5935135 | Bramfitt et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5942209 | Leavitt et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5947993 | Morales | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5948018 | Dereume et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5948428 | Lee et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5951881 | Rogers et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5954744 | Phan et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5955509 | Webber et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5957975 | Lafont et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5958385 | Tondeur et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5962138 | Kolluri et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5965720 | Gryaznov et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5968091 | Pinchuk et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5968092 | Buscemi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5969422 | Ting et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5971954 | Conway et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5972027 | Johnson | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5972029 | Fuisz | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5972505 | Phillips et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5976155 | Foreman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5976182 | Cox | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5980564 | Stinson | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5980928 | Terry | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5980972 | Ding | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5981568 | Kunz et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5984449 | Tajika et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5986169 | Gjunter | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5997468 | Wolff et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 5997517 | Whitbourne | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6010445 | Armini et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6010530 | Goicoechea | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6010573 | Bowlin | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6011125 | Lohmeijer et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6013099 | Dinh et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6015541 | Greff et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6019789 | Dinh et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6024918 | Hendriks et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6027510 | Alt | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6027526 | Limon et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6030371 | Pursley | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6033582 | Lee et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6033719 | Keogh | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6034204 | Mohr et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6042606 | Frantzen | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6042875 | Ding et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6045899 | Wang et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6048964 | Lee et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6051021 | Frid | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6051576 | Ashton et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6051648 | Rhee et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6054553 | Groth et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6056906 | Werneth et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6056993 | Leidner et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6059714 | Armini et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6059752 | Segal | May 2000 | A |
| 6059810 | Brown et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6060451 | DiMaio et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6060518 | Kabanov et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6063092 | Shin | May 2000 | A |
| 6066156 | Yan | May 2000 | A |
| 6068202 | Hynes et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6071266 | Kelley | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6071305 | Brown et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6074659 | Kunz et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6080099 | Slater et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6080177 | Igaki et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6080190 | Schwartz | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6080488 | Hostettler et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6083258 | Yadav | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6086610 | Duerig et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6090330 | Gawa et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6093199 | Brown et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6093463 | Thakrar | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6096070 | Ragheb et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6096525 | Patnaik | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6099455 | Columbo et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6099559 | Nolting | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6099561 | Alt | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6099562 | Ding et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6103230 | Billiar et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6106454 | Berg et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6106530 | Harada | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6106889 | Beavers et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6107416 | Patnaik et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6110180 | Foreman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6110188 | Narciso, Jr. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6110483 | Whitbourne et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6113629 | Ken | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6117479 | Hogan et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6117979 | Hendriks et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6120477 | Campbell et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6120491 | Kohn et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6120535 | McDonald et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6120536 | Ding et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6120788 | Barrows | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6120847 | Yang et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6120904 | Hostettler et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6121027 | Clapper et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6123712 | Di Caprio et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6125523 | Brown et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6126686 | Badylak et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6127173 | Eckstein et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6129755 | Mathis et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6129761 | Hubbell | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6129928 | Sarangapani et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6132809 | Hynes et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6136333 | Cohn et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6140127 | Sprague | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6140431 | Kinker et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6143354 | Koulik et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6143370 | Panagiotou et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6149574 | Trauthen et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6150630 | Perry et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6153252 | Hossainy et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6156373 | Zhong et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6159227 | Di Caprio et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6159229 | Jendersee et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6159951 | Karpeisky et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6159978 | Myers et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6160084 | Langer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6165212 | Dereume et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6165267 | Torczynski | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6166130 | Rhee et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6168617 | Blaeser et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6168619 | Dinh et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6169170 | Gryaznov et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6171334 | Cox | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6171609 | Kunz | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6172167 | Stapert et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6174316 | Tuckey et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6174329 | Callol et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6174330 | Stinson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6177523 | Reich et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6180632 | Myers et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6183505 | Mohn, Jr. et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6187045 | Fehring et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6193727 | Foreman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6194034 | Nishi et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6197013 | Reed et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6203551 | Wu | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6203569 | Wijay | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6209621 | Treacy | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6210715 | Starling et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6211249 | Cohn et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6214115 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6214407 | Laube et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6214901 | Chudzik et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6217586 | Mackenzie | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6217721 | Xu et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6224626 | Steinke | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6224675 | Prentice et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6224894 | Jamiolkowski et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6228072 | Omaleki et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6228845 | Donovan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6231590 | Slaikeu et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6231600 | Zhong | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6235340 | Lee et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6240616 | Yan | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6242041 | Katoot et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6244575 | Vaartstra et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6245076 | Yan | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6245099 | Edwin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6245103 | Stinson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6245753 | Byun et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6245760 | He et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6248129 | Froix | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6248344 | Ylanen et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6248398 | Talieh et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6251135 | Stinson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6251136 | Guruwaiya et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6251142 | Bernacca et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6253443 | Johnson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6254632 | Wu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6258099 | Mareiro et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6258121 | Yang et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6258371 | Koulik et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6261320 | Tam et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6262034 | Mathiowitz et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6270504 | Lorentzen Cornelius et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6270788 | Koulik et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6273850 | Gambale | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6273878 | Muni | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6273908 | Ndondo-Lay | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6273910 | Limon | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6273913 | Wright et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6277110 | Morales | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6277449 | Kolluri et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6279368 | Escano et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6281262 | Shikinami | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6283947 | Mirzaee | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6283949 | Roorda | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6284305 | Ding et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6284333 | Wang et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6287249 | Tam et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6287332 | Bolz et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6287628 | Hossainy et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6290721 | Heath | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6293966 | Frantzen | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6294836 | Paranjpe et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6296603 | Turnlund et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6299604 | Ragheb et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6303901 | Perry et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6306165 | Patnaik et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6306176 | Whitbourne | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6312459 | Huang et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6319520 | Wuthrich et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6322588 | Ogle et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6322847 | Zhong et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6327772 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6331313 | Wong et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6335029 | Kamath et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6344035 | Chudzik et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6346110 | Wu | Feb 2002 | B2 |
| 6358556 | Ding et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6358567 | Pham et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
| 6362099 | Gandikota et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6364903 | Tseng et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6368658 | Schwarz et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6372283 | Shim et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6375458 | Moorleghem et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6375826 | Wang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6379379 | Wang | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6379381 | Hossainy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6383215 | Sass | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6387118 | Hanson | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6387121 | Alt | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6387379 | Goldberg et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6388043 | Langer et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6395325 | Hedge et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6395326 | Castro et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6406738 | Hogan et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6407009 | You et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6409761 | Jang | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6413272 | Igaki | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6416543 | Hilaire et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6419692 | Yang et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6420189 | Lopatin | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6423092 | Datta et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
| 6435798 | Satoh | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6436816 | Lee et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6440221 | Shamouilian et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6444567 | Besser et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6447835 | Wang et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6451373 | Hossainy et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6454738 | Tran et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6455424 | McTeer et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6461632 | Gogolewski | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6462284 | Hashimoto | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6464720 | Boatman et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6468906 | Chan et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6475779 | Mathiowitz et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6479565 | Stanley | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6481262 | Ching et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6482834 | Spada et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6485512 | Cheng | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6488701 | Nolting et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6488773 | Ehrhardt et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6491666 | Santini, Jr. et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6492615 | Flanagan | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6494862 | Ray et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6494908 | Huxel et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6495156 | Wenz et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6495200 | Chan et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6503538 | Chu et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6503556 | Harish et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6503954 | Bhat et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6504307 | Malik et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6506437 | Harish et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6510722 | Ching et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6511748 | Barrows | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6517534 | McGovern et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6517888 | Weber | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6517889 | Jayaraman | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6521284 | Parsons et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6524232 | Tang et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6524347 | Myers et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6527801 | Dutta | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6527863 | Pacetti et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6528526 | Myers et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6530950 | Alvarado et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6530951 | Bates et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6534112 | Bouchier et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6537589 | Chae et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6539607 | Fehring et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6540776 | Sanders Millare et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6540777 | Stenzel | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6544223 | Kokish | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6544543 | Mandrusov et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6544582 | Yoe | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6554758 | Turnlund et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6554854 | Flanagan | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6555059 | Myrick et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6555157 | Hossainy | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6558733 | Hossainy et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6562136 | Chappa et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6565599 | Hong et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6565659 | Pacetti et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6569191 | Hogan | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6569193 | Cox et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6572644 | Moein | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6572651 | De Scheerder et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6572672 | Yadav et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6574851 | Mirizzi | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6575933 | Wittenberger et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6582417 | Ledesma et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6585755 | Jackson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6585765 | Hossainy et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6585926 | Mirzaee | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6592614 | Lenker et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6592617 | Thompson | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6596296 | Nelson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6605114 | Yan et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6605154 | Villareal | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6605874 | Leu et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6610087 | Zarbatany et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6613072 | Lau et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6613432 | Zamora et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6616765 | Hossainy et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6620617 | Mathiowitz et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6623448 | Slater | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6625486 | Lundkvist et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6626939 | Burnside et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6635269 | Jennissen | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6635964 | Maex et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6641611 | Jayaraman | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6645135 | Bhat | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6645195 | Bhat et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6645243 | Vallana et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6645547 | Shekalim et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6656162 | Santini, Jr. et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6656216 | Hossainy et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6656506 | Wu et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6660034 | Mandrusov et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6663662 | Pacetti et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6663880 | Roorda et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6664187 | Ngo et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6664335 | Krishnan | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6666214 | Canham | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6666880 | Chiu et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6667049 | Janas et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6669723 | Killion et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6669980 | Hansen | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6673154 | Pacetti et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6673385 | Ding et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6676697 | Richter | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6676700 | Jacobs et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6679980 | Andreacchi | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6682771 | Zhong et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6689099 | Mirzaee | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6689350 | Uhrich | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6689375 | Wahlig et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6695920 | Pacetti et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6699281 | Vallana et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6703307 | Lopatin et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6706013 | Bhat et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6706273 | Roessler | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6709379 | Brandau et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6709514 | Hossainy | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6712845 | Hossainy | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6713119 | Hossainy et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6716444 | Castro et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6719934 | Stinson | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6719989 | Matsushima et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6720402 | Langer et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6723120 | Yan | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6723373 | Narayanan et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6730064 | Ragheb et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6733768 | Hossainy et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6740040 | Mandrusov et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6743462 | Pacetti | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6746773 | Llanos et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6749626 | Bhat et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6752826 | Holloway et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6753007 | Haggard et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6753071 | Pacetti et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6758859 | Dang et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6759054 | Chen et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6764505 | Hossainy et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6774278 | Ragheb et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6776792 | Yan et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6776796 | Falotico et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6780424 | Claude | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6783793 | Hossainy et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6790228 | Hossainy et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6818063 | Kerrigan | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6824559 | Michal | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6846323 | Yip et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6860946 | Hossainy et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6861088 | Weber et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6865810 | Stinson | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6869443 | Buscemi et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6878160 | Gilligan et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6887270 | Miller et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6887485 | Fitzhugh et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6887510 | Villareal | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6890546 | Mollison et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6890583 | Chudzik et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6899731 | Li et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6955723 | Pacetti et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6972054 | Kerrigan | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6979348 | Sundar | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 7008667 | Chudzik et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7074276 | Van Sciver et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7077860 | Yan et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7175874 | Pacetti | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7198675 | Fox et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7220816 | Pacetti et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7258891 | Pacetti | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7297159 | Hossainy et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7323209 | Esbeck et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7323210 | Castro et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7335265 | Hossainy | Feb 2008 | B1 |
| 7335391 | Pacetti | Feb 2008 | B1 |
| 7338557 | Chen et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7344601 | Coye et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7354480 | Kokish et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7390524 | Chen | Jun 2008 | B1 |
| 7396539 | Hossainy et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7396556 | Hayes | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7404979 | Pacetti | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7416609 | Madriaga et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
| 7435788 | Pacetti | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7485333 | Pacetti et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7504125 | Pacetti et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
| 7553377 | Chen et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
| 7563324 | Chen et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
| 7628859 | Hossainy et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
| 7632307 | Pacetti et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7648727 | Hossainy et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7704544 | Pacetti et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7735449 | Harold et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7776381 | Tang et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 7776926 | Hossainy et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 7794777 | Kokish et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7820732 | Tang et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7823533 | Chen et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7985440 | Pacetti et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8003156 | Van Sciver | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8042485 | Desnoyer et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
| 8069814 | Guerriero et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8161902 | Scheer | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8187661 | Madriaga et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 20010007083 | Roorda | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010014717 | Hossainy et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010016753 | Caprio et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010020011 | Mathiowitz et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010029351 | Falotico et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010037145 | Guruwaiya et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010044652 | Moore | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010051608 | Mathiowitz et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020002399 | Huxel et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020004060 | Heublein et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020004101 | Ding et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020005206 | Falotico et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020007213 | Falotico et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020007214 | Falotico | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020007215 | Falotico et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020009604 | Zamora et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020016625 | Falotico et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020032414 | Ragheb et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020032434 | Chudzik et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020050220 | Schueller et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020051730 | Bodnar et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020062148 | Hart | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020065553 | Weber | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020071822 | Uhrich | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020077693 | Barclay et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020082679 | Sirhan et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020087123 | Hossainy et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020091433 | Ding et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020094440 | Llanos et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020111590 | Davila et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116050 | Kocur | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020120326 | Michal | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138133 | Lenz et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020142039 | Claude | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020155212 | Hossainy | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020161114 | Gunatillake et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165608 | Llanos et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020176849 | Slepian | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020183581 | Yoe et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020187632 | Marsh | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188037 | Chudzik et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188277 | Roorda et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030003221 | Zhong et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030004141 | Brown | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028243 | Bates et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028244 | Bates et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030031780 | Chudzik et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030032767 | Tada et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030033001 | Igaki | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030036794 | Ragheb et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030039689 | Chen et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030040712 | Ray et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030040790 | Furst | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030054090 | Hansen | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030055482 | Schwager et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030059520 | Chen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030060877 | Falotico et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030065377 | Davila et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030072868 | Harish et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030073961 | Happ | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030083646 | Sirhan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030083739 | Cafferata | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030088307 | Shulze et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093107 | Parsonage et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030097088 | Pacetti | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030097173 | Dutta | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030099712 | Jayaraman | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030100865 | Santini, Jr. et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030105518 | Dutta | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030105530 | Pirhonen | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030113438 | Liu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030113439 | Pacetti et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030113445 | Martin | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030138487 | Hogan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030150380 | Yoe | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030157241 | Hossainy et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030158517 | Kokish | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030171053 | Sanders | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030185964 | Weber et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030187495 | Cully et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030190406 | Hossainy et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030203617 | Lane et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030207020 | Villareal | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030208259 | Penhasi | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030209835 | Chun et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030211230 | Pacetti et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030215564 | Heller et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030226833 | Shapovalov et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030236565 | DiMatteo et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040013792 | Epstein et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040018296 | Castro et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040029952 | Chen et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040047978 | Hossainy et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040047980 | Pacetti et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040052858 | Wu et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040052859 | Wu et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040054104 | Pacetti | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040060508 | Pacetti et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040062853 | Pacetti et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040063805 | Pacetti et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040071861 | Mandrusov et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040072922 | Hossainy et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040073298 | Hossainy | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040079354 | Takeda | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040086542 | Hossainy et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040086550 | Roorda et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040093077 | White et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040096504 | Michal | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040098095 | Burnside et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040098117 | Hossainy et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111149 | Stinson | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040127970 | Saunders | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040142015 | Hossainy et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040143317 | Stinson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167610 | Fleming, III | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040187775 | Kerrigan | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040191405 | Kerrigan | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040213893 | Boulais | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040236417 | Yan et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040265475 | Hossainy | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050010282 | Thornton et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050037052 | Udipi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050038134 | Loomis et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050038497 | Neuendorf et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050043786 | Chu et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050049693 | Walker | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050049694 | Neary | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050054774 | Kangas | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055044 | Kangas | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055078 | Campbell | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060020 | Jenson | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050064088 | Fredrickson | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050065501 | Wallace | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050065545 | Wallace | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050065593 | Chu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050069630 | Fox et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050074406 | Couvillon, Jr. et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050074544 | Pacetti et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050074545 | Thomas | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050075714 | Cheng et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050079274 | Palasis et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050084515 | Udipi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050106210 | Ding et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113903 | Rosenthal et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050144806 | Yoshida | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050208091 | Pacetti | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20060029720 | Panos et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060147611 | Coye et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060216403 | Hayes | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060216431 | Kerrigan | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20070031607 | Dubson et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20080094428 | Otis et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2 008 312 | Jul 1990 | CA |
| 2 007 648 | Apr 1991 | CA |
| 1 322 628 | Oct 1993 | CA |
| 1 336 319 | Jul 1995 | CA |
| 1 338 303 | May 1996 | CA |
| 042 24 401 | Jan 1994 | DE |
| 044 07 079 | Sep 1994 | DE |
| 197 31 021 | Jan 1999 | DE |
| 199 16 086 | Oct 1999 | DE |
| 198 56 983 | Dec 1999 | DE |
| 0 108 171 | May 1984 | EP |
| 0 144 534 | Jun 1985 | EP |
| 0 301 856 | Feb 1989 | EP |
| 0 380 668 | Apr 1989 | EP |
| 0 351 314 | Jan 1990 | EP |
| 0 364 787 | Apr 1990 | EP |
| 0 396 429 | Nov 1990 | EP |
| 0 397 500 | Nov 1990 | EP |
| 0 464 755 | Jan 1992 | EP |
| 0 493 788 | Jul 1992 | EP |
| 0 526 606 | Sep 1992 | EP |
| 0 514 406 | Nov 1992 | EP |
| 0 517 075 | Dec 1992 | EP |
| 0 540 290 | May 1993 | EP |
| 0 553 960 | Aug 1993 | EP |
| 0 554 082 | Aug 1993 | EP |
| 0 565 251 | Oct 1993 | EP |
| 0 578 998 | Jan 1994 | EP |
| 0 604 022 | Jun 1994 | EP |
| 0 621 017 | Oct 1994 | EP |
| 0 623 354 | Nov 1994 | EP |
| 0 627 226 | Dec 1994 | EP |
| 0 649 637 | Apr 1995 | EP |
| 0 665 023 | Aug 1995 | EP |
| 0 701 802 | Mar 1996 | EP |
| 0 701 803 | Mar 1996 | EP |
| 0 709 068 | May 1996 | EP |
| 0 716 836 | Jun 1996 | EP |
| 0 732 087 | Sep 1996 | EP |
| 0 832 618 | Sep 1996 | EP |
| 0 756 853 | Feb 1997 | EP |
| 0 809 999 | Dec 1997 | EP |
| 0 832 655 | Apr 1998 | EP |
| 0 834 293 | Apr 1998 | EP |
| 0 850 604 | Jul 1998 | EP |
| 0 850 651 | Jul 1998 | EP |
| 0 875 218 | Nov 1998 | EP |
| 0 879 595 | Nov 1998 | EP |
| 0 897 701 | Feb 1999 | EP |
| 0 910 584 | Apr 1999 | EP |
| 0 923 953 | Jun 1999 | EP |
| 0 953 320 | Nov 1999 | EP |
| 0 970 711 | Jan 2000 | EP |
| 0 972 498 | Jan 2000 | EP |
| 0 974 315 | Jan 2000 | EP |
| 0 982 041 | Mar 2000 | EP |
| 1 023 879 | Aug 2000 | EP |
| 1 034 752 | Sep 2000 | EP |
| 1 075 838 | Feb 2001 | EP |
| 1 103 234 | May 2001 | EP |
| 1 192 957 | Apr 2002 | EP |
| 1 273 314 | Jan 2003 | EP |
| 0 869 847 | Mar 2003 | EP |
| 0 941 072 | Jan 2004 | EP |
| 1 518 570 | Mar 2005 | EP |
| 2 753 907 | Apr 1998 | FR |
| 2 247 696 | Mar 1992 | GB |
| 2 316 086 | Jan 2000 | GB |
| 2 316 342 | Jan 2000 | GB |
| 2 333 975 | Jan 2000 | GB |
| 2 336 551 | Jan 2000 | GB |
| 2 356 586 | May 2001 | GB |
| 2 356 587 | May 2001 | GB |
| 2 333 474 | Jun 2001 | GB |
| 2 334 685 | Jun 2001 | GB |
| 2 356 585 | Jul 2001 | GB |
| 2 374 302 | Aug 2001 | GB |
| 2 370 243 | Jun 2002 | GB |
| 2 384 199 | Jul 2003 | GB |
| SHO49-48336 | Dec 1974 | JP |
| SHO54-18317 | Jul 1979 | JP |
| SHO60-28504 | Jul 1985 | JP |
| 05009726 | Jan 1993 | JP |
| 21199867 | May 1994 | JP |
| HEI8-33718 | Feb 1996 | JP |
| HEI10-151190 | Jun 1998 | JP |
| 2919971 | Jul 1999 | JP |
| 11299901 | Nov 1999 | JP |
| 2001-190687 | Jul 2001 | JP |
| 0872531 | Oct 1981 | SU |
| 0876663 | Oct 1981 | SU |
| 0905228 | Feb 1982 | SU |
| 0790725 | Feb 1983 | SU |
| 1016314 | May 1983 | SU |
| 0811750 | Sep 1983 | SU |
| 1293518 | Feb 1987 | SU |
| 1477423 | May 1989 | SU |
| WO 8903232 | Apr 1989 | WO |
| WO 9001969 | Mar 1990 | WO |
| WO 9004982 | May 1990 | WO |
| WO 9006094 | Jun 1990 | WO |
| WO 9111176 | Aug 1991 | WO |
| WO 9112846 | Sep 1991 | WO |
| WO 9117744 | Nov 1991 | WO |
| WO 9117789 | Nov 1991 | WO |
| WO 9210218 | Jun 1992 | WO |
| WO 9306792 | Apr 1993 | WO |
| WO 9409760 | May 1994 | WO |
| WO 9421196 | Sep 1994 | WO |
| WO 9510989 | Apr 1995 | WO |
| WO 9511817 | May 1995 | WO |
| WO 9524929 | Sep 1995 | WO |
| WO 9527878 | Oct 1995 | WO |
| WO 9529647 | Nov 1995 | WO |
| WO 9533422 | Dec 1995 | WO |
| WO 9628115 | Sep 1996 | WO |
| WO 9635516 | Nov 1996 | WO |
| WO 9640174 | Dec 1996 | WO |
| WO 9710011 | Mar 1997 | WO |
| WO 9745105 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| WO 9746590 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| WO 9804415 | Feb 1998 | WO |
| WO 9807390 | Feb 1998 | WO |
| WO 9808463 | Mar 1998 | WO |
| WO 9817331 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| WO 9820863 | May 1998 | WO |
| WO 9823228 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| WO 9832398 | Jul 1998 | WO |
| WO 9836784 | Aug 1998 | WO |
| WO 9901118 | Jan 1999 | WO |
| WO 9903515 | Jan 1999 | WO |
| WO 9916386 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| WO 9938546 | Aug 1999 | WO |
| WO 9942147 | Aug 1999 | WO |
| WO 9963981 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| WO 0002599 | Jan 2000 | WO |
| WO 0012147 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| WO 0018446 | Apr 2000 | WO |
| WO 0064506 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO 0100112 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| WO 0101890 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| WO 0115751 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO 0117459 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO 0117577 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO 0143727 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO 0145763 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO 0149338 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO 0151027 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO 0152772 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO 0157144 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO 0174414 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| WO 0191918 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 0203890 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| WO 0226162 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| WO 0234311 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO 0247731 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| WO 0249771 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| WO 02056790 | Jul 2002 | WO |
| WO 02058753 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| WO 02087550 | Nov 2002 | WO |
| WO 02102283 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| WO 03000308 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO 03007918 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO 03007919 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO 03022323 | Mar 2003 | WO |
| WO 03028780 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO 03037223 | May 2003 | WO |
| WO 03039612 | May 2003 | WO |
| WO 03061841 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO 03072084 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| WO 03072086 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| WO 03080147 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| WO 03082368 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004000383 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004009145 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004017947 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004017976 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004023985 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004024339 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/805,047, filed Mar. 18, 2004,Yip et al. |
| U.S. Appl. 10/816,072, filed Mar. 31, 2004, Dugan et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/835,229, filed Apr. 28, 2004, Prabhu et al. |
| Inv. To Pay Additional Fees for PCT/US2007/009115, mailed Oct. 26, 2007, 10 pgs. |
| Angioplasty.org., Ballons and Stents, http://www.ptca.org/devices04.html, printed Oct. 15, 2004, 2 pages. |
| Anonymous, Bioabsorbable stent mounted on a catheter having optical coherence tomography capabilities, Research Disclosure, pp. 1159-1162 (Sep. 2004). |
| Anonymous, Capillary Action, http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/PenetrantTest/Introduction/Keywords/pt1.htm, printed Aug. 12, 2005, 1 page. |
| Anonymous, Capillary Force Lithography (CFL), Nano Processing and Organic Devices Lab, 2 pages. (no date). |
| Anonymous, Capillary Rise of Liquid in Different Vanes Under Variable Residual Acceleration, http://www.zarm.uni-bremen.de/2forschung/grenzph/isoterm/cap—rise/kapst—en.htm, ZARM—University of Bermen, printed Jun. 25, 2003, 2 pages. |
| Anonymous, Cardiologists Draw—Up the Dream Stent, Clinica 710, pp. 15 (Jun. 17, 1996), http://www.dialogweb.com/cgi/document?reg=1061848202959, printed Aug. 25, 2003, 2 pages. |
| Anonymous, Coating Techniques, Air Knife Coating, http://www.ferron-magnetic.co.uk/coatings/airknife.htm printed Jul. 1, 2003, 1 page. |
| Anonymous, Coating Techniques, Gap Coating (Knife Over Roll, etc.), http://www.ferron-magnetic.co.uk/coatings/knife.htm printed Jul. 1, 2003, 1 page. |
| Anonymous, Coating Techniques, Gravure Coating, http://www.ferron-magnetic.co.uk/coatings/gravure.htm, printed Jul. 1, 2003, 2 pages. |
| Anonymous, Coating Techniques, Reverse Roll Coating, http://www.ferron-magnetic.co.uk/coatings/revroll htm, printed Jul. 1, 2003, 22 pages. |
| Anonymous, Heparin-coated stents cut complications by 30%, Clinica 732, pp. 17 (Nov. 18, 1996), http://www.dialogweb.com/cgi/document?reg=1061847871753, printed Aug. 25, 2003, 2 pages. |
| Anonymous, Liquid Gravity Motor, http://www.drspark86.com/idea001.html, printed Jun. 24, 2003,.2 pages (no. date). |
| Anonymous, Porosimetry—Why characterize the porosity? 42 pages (no date.). |
| Anonymous, Rolling Therapeutic Agent Loading Device for Therapeutic Agent Delivery or Coated Stent (Abstract 434009), Res. Disclos. pp. 974-975 (Jun. 2000). |
| Anonymous, Stenting Continues to Dominate Cardiology, http://www.dialogweb.com/cgi/document?reg=1061848017752, Clinica vol. 720, pp. 22 (Sep. 2, 1996), printed Aug. 25, 2003, 2 pages. |
| Anonymous, Surface Energy (Surface Wetting Capability), http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/PenetrantTest/PTMaterials/surfaceenergy.htm, printed Apr. 6, 2004, 3 pages (no date). |
| Anonymous, The 14th International Young Physicists Tournament, The winning report, Research Center for Quantum Information, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 5 pages (no date). |
| Anonymous, The Wicking Well System, http://www.decorative.com/wicking.html, printed Jun. 24, 2003, 1 page. |
| Anonymous, Typical Parylene Properties, 3 pages (no date). |
| Anonymous, Viscosity, Commonwealth of Australia, 7 pages (no date). |
| Ansari, End-to-End Tubal Anastomosis Using an Absorbable Stent, Fertility and Sterility, vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 197-201 (Aug. 1979). |
| Ansari, Tubal Reanastomosis Using Absorbable Stent, International Journal of Fertility, vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 242-243 (1978). |
| Aoyagi et al., Preparation of cross-linked aliphatic polyester and application to thermo-responsive material, Journal of Controlled Release 32, pp. 87-96 (1994). |
| Barath et al., Low Dose of Antitumor Agents Prevents Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation After Endothelial Injury, JACC vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 252A (Feb. 1989). |
| Barbucci et al., Coating of commercially available materials with a new heparinizable Material, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 25, pp. 1259-1274 (1991). |
| Beach et al., Xylylene Polymers, Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, vol. 17, 2nd Edition, pp. 990-1025 (1989). |
| Boston Scientific, Express 2 ™ Coronary Stent System, http://www.bostonscientific.com/med—specialty/deviceDetail.jsp?task=tskBasicDevice.jsp§ionId=4&relld=2,74,75,76&deviceId=11001&unigueId=MPDB1180&clickType=endeca, printed Aug. 8, 2005, 1 page. |
| Bull, Parylene Coating for Medical Applications, Medical Product Manufacturing News, 2 pages (Mar. 1993). |
| Casper et al., Fiber-Reinforced Absorbable Composite for Orthopedic Surgery, Polymeric Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 53, pp. 497-501(1985). |
| Charlson et al., Temperature Selective Deposition of Parylene-C, IEEE Transactions of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 202-206 (Feb. 1992). |
| Chen et al., The Kinetics of Wicking of Liquid Droplets into Yarns, submitted to the Textile Research Journal, pp. 1-30 (Apr. 2001). |
| Chung et al., Inner core segment design for drug delivery control of thermo-responsive polymeric micelles, Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 65, pp. 93-103 (2000). |
| Coating Techniques, Air Knife Coating, http://www.ferron-magnetic.co.uk/coatings/airknife.htm, 1 page, printed Jul. 1, 2003. |
| Coating Techniques, Gap Coating, http://www.ferron-magnetic.co.uk/coatings/knife.htm, 1 page, printed Jul. 1, 2003. |
| Coating Techniques, Gravure Coating, http://www.ferron-magnetic.co.uk/coatings/gravure.htm, 2 page , printed Jul. 1, 2003. |
| Coating Techniques, Reverse Roll Coating, http://www.ferron-magnetic.co.uk/coatings/revroll.htm, 2 pages, printed Jul. 1, 2003. |
| Crowe et al., Absorption and Intestinal Metabolism of SDZ-RAD and Rapamycin in Rats, Drug Metabolism and Disposition, vol. 27, No. 5, pp. 627-632 (1999). |
| De Scheerder et al., Biocompatibility of polymer-coated oversized metallic stents implanted in normal porcine coronary arteries, Atherosclerosis, vol. 114, pp. 105-114 (1995). |
| Detweiler et al., Gastrointestinal Sutureless Anastomosis Using Fibrin Glue: Reinforcement of the Sliding Absorbable Intraluminal Nontoxic Stent and Development of a Stent Placement Device, Journal of Investigative Surgery, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 111-130 (Mar./Apr. 1996). |
| Detweiler et al., Sliding, Absorbable, Reinforced Ring and an Axially Driven Stent Placement Device for Sutureless Fibrin Glue Gastrointestinal Anastomisis, Journal of Investigative Surgery, vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 495-504 (Nov./Dec. 1996). |
| Detweiler et al., Sutureless Anastomosis of the Small Intestine and the Colon in Pigs Using an Absorbable Intraluminal Stent and Fibrin Glue, Journal of Investigative Surgery, vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 129-140 (Mar. 1995). |
| Detweiler et al., Sutureless Cholecystojejunostomy in Pigs Using an Absorbable Intraluminal Stent and Fibrin Glue, Journal of Investigative Surgery, vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 13-26 (Jan./Feb. 1996). |
| Dev et al., Kinetics of Drug Delivery to the Arterial Wall Via Polyurethane-Coated Removable Nitinol Stent: Comparative Study of Two Drugs, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, vol. 34, pp. 272-278 (1995). |
| Devanathan et al., Polymeric Conformal Coatings for Implantable Electronic Devices, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. BME-27, No. 11, pp. 671-675 (1980). |
| Dichek et al., Seeding of Intravascular Stents with Genetically Engineered Endothelial Cells, Circulation, vol. 80, No. 5, pp. 1347-1353 (Nov. 1989). |
| Dreyer et al.,Critical Velocities in Open Capillary Flows, pp. 604-609 (no date). |
| Duerig et al., A comparison of balloon-and self-expanding stents, Min. Invas. Ther. & Allied Technol., vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 173-178 (2002). |
| Dutkiewicz, Some Advances in Nonwoven Structures for Absorbency, Comfort and Aesthetics, AUTEX Research Journal, vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 153-165 (Sep. 2002). |
| EFD, 780S Series Spray Valves VALVEMATE™ 7040 Controller Operating Manual, 24 pages (2002). |
| Eigler et al., Local Arterial Wall Drug Delivery from a Polymer Coated Removable Metallic Stent: Kinetics, Distribution, and Bioactivity of Forskolin, JACC, vol. 4A, pp. 701-701, Abstract (Feb. 1994). |
| Elbert et al., Conjugate Addition Reactions Combined with Free-Radical Cross-Linking for the Design of Materials for Tissue Engineering, Biomacromolecules, vol. 2, pp. 430-441 (2001). |
| Erickson et al., Numerical Simulations of Capillary-Driven Flows in Nonuniform Cross-Sectional Capillaries, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 250, pp. 422-430 (2002). |
| Eskin et al., Growth of Cultured Calf Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells on Cardiovascular Prosthetic Materials, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. vol. 10, pp. 113-122 (1976). |
| Eskin et al., Tissue Cultured Cells: Potential Blood Compatible Linings for Cardiovascular Prostheses, Polymer Science and Technology, vol. 14, pp. 143-161 (no. date). |
| Fischell et al., Low-Dose, β-Particle Emission from ‘Stent’ Wire Results in Complete, Localized Inhibition of Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation, Circulation, vol. 90, No. 6, pp. 2956-2963 (Dec. 1994). |
| Fischell et al., The Bx Velocity™ Stent, 5 pages, Biocompatibles Ltd. (2001). |
| Forrester et al., A Paradigm for Restenosis Based on Cell Biology: Clues for the Development of New Preventive Therapies; J. Am. Coll. Cardio. 1991; 17:758-769. |
| Gengenbach et al., Evolution of the Surface Composition and Topography of Perflurinated Polymers Following Ammonia-Plasma Treatment, Plasma Surface Modifications of Polymers, pp. 123-146 (1994). |
| Gercken et al., Results of the Jostent Coronary Stent Graft Implantation in Various Clinical Settings: Procedural and Follow-Up Results, vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 353-360 (2002). |
| Gölander et al., RF-Plasma-Modified Polystyrene Surfaces for Studying Complement Activation, J. Biomater. Sci. Plymer Edn., vol. 4, No. 1 pp. 25-30 (1992). |
| Guidant, ACS RX MULTI-LINK™ Coronary Stent System, 6 pages. (no date). |
| Guidant, GUIDANT MULTI-LINK VISION OTW Coronary Stent System, 2 pages (no date). |
| Hahn et al., Biocompatibility of Glow-Discharge-Polmerized Films and Vacuum-Deposited Parylene, Journal of Applied Polymer Science: Applied Polymer Symposium 38, 55-64 (1984). |
| Hahn et al., Glow Discharge Polymers as Coatings for Implanted Devices, John M. Dalton Research Center, University of Missouri-Columbia and the Graduate Center for Materials Research, pp. 109-113 (1981). |
| He et al., Assessment of Tissue Blood Flow Following Small Artery Welding with an Intraluminal Dissolvable Stent, Microsurgery, vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 148-152 (1999). |
| Hehrlein et al., Low-Dose Radioactive Endovascular Stents Prevent Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation and Neointimal Hyperplasia in Rabbits, Circulation, vol. 92, No. 6, pp. 1570-1575 (Sep. 15, 1995). |
| Helmus, Overview of Biomedical Materials, MRS Bulletin, pp. 33-38 (Sep. 1991). |
| Herdeg et al., Antiproliferative Stent Coatings: Taxol and Related Compounds, Semin. Intervent. Cardiol., vol. 3, pp. 197-199 (1998). |
| Hollahan et al., Attachment of Amino Groups to Polymer Surfaces by Radiofrequency Plasmas, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 13, pp. 807-816 (1969). |
| Huang et al., Biodegradable Polymers Derived from Aminoacids, Macromol. Symp. 144, 7-32 (1999). |
| Illbruck Sealant Systems, Application: Window and Perimeter Silicone, http://www.willseal.com/usa/produktuebersicht/dichtstoffe/oerwindow/verlege—anleitunq . . . . , printed Nov. 29, 2004 (3 pages). |
| Impulse Jetting, About Us, http://www.impulsjetting.com/about.html, printed Dec. 18, 2000, 1 page. |
| Impulse Jetting, Our Technology, http://www.impulsejetting.com/tech1.html, printed Dec. 18, 2000, 1 page. |
| Inagaki et al., Hydrophilic Surface Modification of Polyethylene by No-Plasma Treatment, Adhesion Sci. Technol., vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 99-107 (1990). |
| Inoue et al., An AB block copolymer of oligo(methyl methacrylate) and poly(actylic acid) for micellar delivery of hydrophobic drugs, Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 51, pp. 221-229 (1998). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of WIPO Application No. WIPO/US2004/026137 filed Aug. 11, 2004 (Jan. 31, 2005). |
| Itabashi et al., Electroless Deposited CoWB for Copper Diffusion Barrier Metal, International Interconnect Technology Conference, pp. 285-287 (2002). |
| John Ritchie Production Group, Production of Stents (presentation), 15 pages (Apr. 24, 2003). |
| Kataoka et al., Block Copolymer Micelles as Vehicles for Drug Delivery, Journal of Controlled Release vol. 24, pp. 119-132 (1993). |
| Katsarava et al., Amino Acid-Based Bioanalogous Polymers. Synthesis and Study of Regular Poly(ester amide)s Based on Bis(β-amino acid)β,ω-Alkylene Diesters, and Aliphatic Dicarbolic Acids, Journal of Polymer Science, Part A: Polymer Chemistry, vol. 37, 391-407 (1999). |
| Katsarava et al., Amino Acid-Based Bioanalogous Polymers. Synthesis and Study of Regular Poly(ester amide)s Based on Bis(α-amino acid)α,-Alkylene Diesters, and Aliphatic Dicarbolic Acids, Journal of Polymer Science, Part A: Polymer Chemistry, 37(4), 391-407 (1999). |
| Kawai et al., Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetics of Cyclosporine A: Extension to Tissue Distribution Kinetics in Rats and Scale-up to Human, The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 287, No. 2, pp. 457-468 (1998). |
| Kelley et al., Totally Resorbable High-Strength Composite Material, Advances in Biomedical Polymers, vol. 35, pp. 75-85 (1987). |
| Kim, Solid State Sintering, AMSE 604 Solid State Reactions and Sintering, Electroceramic laboratory in Dept. Of Materials Science & Engineering, POSTECH, Pohang University of Science and Technology (20 pages). |
| Klocke et al, How Soil Holds Water (G90-964), http://ianrpubs.unl.edu/fieldcrops/g964.htm, printed Apr. 6, 2004, 9 pages. |
| Konopka, In-Plane Moisture Transport in Nonwovens, Nonwovens Cooperative Research Center, NC State University, 56 pages (no date). |
| Kovarik et al., Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Assessments of HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors When Coadministered with Everolimus, Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 42, pp. 222-228 (2002). |
| Kubies et al., Microdomain Structure in polylactide-block-poly(ethylene oxide) copolymer films, Biomaterials,vol. 21, pp. 529-536 (2000). |
| Kutryk et al., Coronary Stenting: Current Perspectives, a companion to the Handbook of Coronary Stents, 16 pages (1999). |
| Lambert et al., Localized Arterial Wall Drug Delivery From a Polymer-Coated Removable Metallic Stent, Circulation, vol. 90, No. 2, pp. 1003-1011 (Aug. 1994). |
| Lemos et al., Coronary Restenosis After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation, Circulation, vol. 108, No. 3, pp. 257-260 (Jul. 22, 2003). |
| Levy et al., Strategies for Treating Arterial Restenosis Using Polymeric Controlled Release Implants, Biotechnology and Bioactive Polymers, pp. 259-268 (1994). |
| Liermann et al., Prophylactic Endovascular Radiotherapy to Prevent Intimal Hyperplasia after Stent Implantation in Femoropopliteal Arteries, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 17, pp. 12-16 (1994). |
| Liu et al., Drug Release Characteristics of Unimolecular Polymeric Micelles, Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 68, pp. 167-174 (2000). |
| Loeb et al., Parylene as a Chronically Stable, Reproducible Microelectrode Insulator, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, pp. 121-128 (Mar. 1977). |
| Loh et al., Plasma Enhanced Parylene Deposition, Antec, pp. 1099-1103 (1991). |
| Machine Solutions, FFS700 MSI Balloon Form/Fold/Set Equipment (PTCA), FFS800 MSI Balloon Form/Fold/Set Equipment (PTA), http://machinesolutions.org/ffs7—8.html, printed Nov. 21, 2003 (2 pgs.). |
| Machine Solutions, SC700 MSI Stent Crimping Equipment (PTCA), SC800 MSI Stent Crimping Equipment (PTA), http://www.machinesolutions.orb/sc7—8.html, printed Nov. 21, 2003, 2 pages. |
| Malik et al, Development of an Energetic Ion Assisted Mixing and Deposition Process for TINx and Diamondlike Carbon Films, Using a Co-axial Geometry in Plasma Source Ion Implantation, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 2875-2879 (Nov./Dec. 1997). |
| Malik et al., Overview of plasma source ion implantation research at University of Wisconsin-Madison, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, No. 12, vol. 2, pp. 843-849 (Mar./Apr. 1994). |
| Malik et al., Sheath dynamics and dose analysis for planar targets in plasma source ion implantation, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. vol. 2, pp. 81-85 (1993). |
| Marconi et al., Covalent bonding of heparin to a vinyl copolymer for biomedical applications, Biomaterials, vol. 18, No. 12, pp. 885-890 (1997). |
| Martin et al., Enhancing the biological activity of immobilized osteopontin using a type-1 collagen affinity coating, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., vol. 70A, pp. 10-19 (May 14, 2004). |
| Matsumaru et al., Embolic Materials for Endovascular Treatment of Cerebral Lesions, J. Biomater. Sci. Polymer Edn., vol. 8, No. 7, pp. 555-569 (1997). |
| Mauduit et al., Hydrolytic degradation of films prepared from blends of high and low molecular weight poly(DL-lactic acid)s, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., vol. 30, pp. 201-207 (1996). |
| Middleton et al., Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devices, Biomaterials, vol. 21, pp. 2335-2346 (2000). |
| Miyazaki et al., Antitumor Effect of Implanted Ethylene-Vinyl Alcohol Copolymer Matrices Containing Anticancer Agents on Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma and P388 Leukemia in Mice, Chem. Pharm. Bull., vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 2490-2498 (1985). |
| Miyazawa et al., Effects of Pemirolast and Tranilast on Intimal Thickening After Arterial Injury in the Rat, J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol., vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 157-162 (1997). |
| Moody, Vacuum Coating Ultrasonic Transducers, 1 page, Sensors (Dec. 1993). |
| Muller et al., Advances in Coronary Angioplasty: Endovascular Stents, Coronary Artery Disease, vol. 1, No. 4., pp. 438-448 (Jul./Aug. 1990). |
| Neimark et al., Hierarchical Pore Structure and Wetting Properties of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotube Fibers, Nano Letters, vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 419-423 (2003). |
| Nichols et al., Electrical Insulation of Implantable Devices by Composite Polymer Coatings, ISA Transactions, vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 15-18 (1987). |
| Nordrehaug et al., A Novel Biocompatible Coating Applied to Coronary Stents, EPO Heart Journal 14, p. 321 (P1694), Abstr. Suppl. (1993). |
| Nova Tran™ Custom Coating Services, Parylene Conformal Coating, 8 pages (no date). |
| Ohsawa et al., Preventive Effects of an Antiallergic Drug, Pemirolast Potassium, on Restenosis After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty, American Heart Journal, vol. 136, No. 6, pp. 1081-1087 (Dec. 1998). |
| Olson, Parylene, a Biostabel Coating for Medical Applications, Specialty Coating Systems, Inc. Nova Tran™ Parylene Coating Services (no date). |
| Ozaki et al., New Stent Technologies, Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, vol. XXXXIX, No. 2, pp. 129-140 (Sep./Oct. 1996). |
| Para Tech Coating Company, Galxyl, Parylene Coatings by Para Tech, 1 page (no date). |
| Para Tech Coating Company,Lab Top® Parylene Deposition System, 2 pages (no date). |
| Pechar et al., Poly(ethylene glycol) Multiblock Copolymer as a Carrier of Anti-Cancer Drug Doxorubicin, Bioconjucate Chemistry vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 131-139 (Mar./Apr. 2000). |
| Peng et al., Role of polymers in improving the results of stenting in coronary arteries, Biomaterial, vol. 17, pp. 685-694 (1996). |
| Peuster et al., A novel approach to temporary stenting: degradable cardiovascular stents produced from corrodible metal—results 6-18 months after implantation into New Zealand white rabbits, Heart vol. 86, pp. 563-569 (2001). |
| Pietrzak et al., Bioabsorbable Fixation Devices: Status for the Craniomaxillofacial Surgeon, Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 92-96 (1997). |
| Pietrzak et al., Bioresorbable Implants—Practical Considerations, Bone, vol. 19, No. 1, Supplement, pp. 109S-119S (Jul. 1996). |
| Poncin-Epaillard et al., Reactivity of a Polypropylene Surface Modified in a Nitrogen Plasma, Plasma Surface Modification of Polymers pp. 167-180 (1994). |
| Prabhu, Computational Modeling in Stent-based Drug Delivery, Business Briefing: Medical Device Manufacturing & Technology, 4 pages (2004). |
| Redman, Clinical Experience with Vasovasostomy Utilizing Absorbable Intravasal Stent, Urology, vol. XX, No. 11, pp. 59-61 (Jul. 1982). |
| Refracton Techonolgies, Corp., Fine Bubble Diffusers, 2 pages (do date). |
| Refracton Techonolgies, Corp., Refractron Advanced Porous Ceramic Product Capabilities, http://www.refractron.com/ecom/sp/cat=Product+Information, printed Apr. 6, 2004, 3 pages. |
| Refractron Technologies Corp., http://www.refractron.com/ecom/sp/cat=Custom+Applications, printed Jun. 24, 2003, 1 page. |
| Rust et al., The Effect of Absorbable Stenting on Postoperative Stenosis of the Surgically Enlarged Maxillary Sinus Ostia in a Rabbit Animal Model, Archives of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 122, pp. 1395-1397 (Dec. 1996). |
| Sadhir et al., The Adhesion of Glow-Discharge Polymers, Silastic and Parylene to Implantable Platinum Electrodes: Results of Tensil Pull tests After Exposure to Isotonic Sodium Chloride, Biomaterials, vol. 2, pp. 239-243 (Oct. 1981). |
| Saotome, et al., Novel Enzymatically Degradable Polymers Comprising α-Amino Acid, 1,2-Ethanediol, and Adipic Acid, Chemistry Letters, pp. 21-24, (1991). |
| Schatz, A View of Vascular Stents, Circulation, vol. 79, No. 2, pp. 445-457 (Feb. 1989). |
| Scheuer et al., Model of plasma source ion implantation in planar, cylindrical, and spherical geometries, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 1241-1245 (Feb. 1990). |
| Schmidt et al., Long-term Implants of Parylene-C Coated Microelectrodes, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, pp. 96-101 (Jan. 1988). |
| Serkova et al., Tissue Distribution and Clinical Monitoring of the Novel Macrolide Immunosuppressant SDZ-RAD and its Metabolites in Monkey Lung Transplant Recipients: Interaction with Cyclosporine, The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 294, No. 1, pp. 323-332 (2000). |
| Serruys et al., I Like the Candy, I Hate the Wrapper; the 32 P Radioactive Stent, Circulation, vol. 101, pp. 3-7 (Jan. 2000). |
| Shamim et al., Measurement of electron emission due to energetic ion bombardment in plasma source ion implantation, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 70, No. 9, pp. 4756-4759 (Nov. 1991). |
| Shamim et al., Measurements of Spatial and Temporal Sheath Evolution for Spherical and Cylindrical Geometrics in Plasma Source Ion Implantation, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 69, No. 5, pp. 2904-2908 (Mar. 1991). |
| Shigeno, Prevention of Cerebrovascular Spasm by Bosentan, Novel Endothelin Receptor, Chemical Abstract 125:21230 (1996). |
| Sono Tek Corporation, AccuMist™ for Single Stent Coating Applications, http://www.sono-tek.com/biomedical/accumist—stent.html, printed Aug. 2005, 3 pages. |
| Sono Tek Corporation, MediCoat198 DES 1000, Benchtop Stent Coating System, http://www.sono-tek.com/biomedical/medicoat—standalone.html, printed Aug. 2, 2005, 4 pages. |
| Sono Tek Corporation, MicroMist for Stent Coating, http://www.sono-tek.com/biomedical/micromist—stent.html, printed Aug. 2, 2005, 3 pages. |
| Spagnuolo et al., Gas 1 is induced by VE-cadherin and vascular endothelial growth factor and inhibits endothelial cell apoptosis, Blood, vol. 103, No. 6, pp. 3005-3012 (2004). |
| Specialty Coating Systems, Inc., The Parylene Press, 4 pages (Summer 1993). |
| Specialty Coating Systems, Inc., The Parylene Press, 6 pages (Spring 1993). |
| Specialty Coating Systems, Inc., The Parylene Press, 7 pages (Winter 1992). |
| Specialty Coating Systems, Parylene and Nova Tran™ Parylene Coating Services, for Unmatched Conformal Coating Performance, 21 pages (no date). |
| Specialty Coating Systems, Parylene, a Biostable Coating for Medical Applications, 6 pages (no date). |
| Specialty Coating Systems, Repair and Recoating of Parylene Coated Printed Circuit Boards, 15 pages (no date). |
| Straube, Moisture, Materials, & Buildings, HPAC Engineering, pp. 2-7 (no date). |
| Taher, Capillary interaction between a small thin solid plate and a liquid, Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 4 pages (no date). |
| Tamai et al., Initial and 6-Month Results of Biodegradable Poly-I-Lactic Acid Coronary Stents in Humans, Circulation, vol. 102, pp. 399-404 (2000). |
| Trident, Inc., http://www.tridentintl.com/subbody.html, printed Dec. 18, 2000, 1 page. |
| Trident, Inc., Product Lines, http://www.tridentintl.com/products-apps/ultrajet.html, printed Dec. 18, 2000, 3 pages. |
| Tsuji et al., Biodegradable Polymeric Stents, Current Interventional Cardiology Reports vol. 3, pp. 10-17 (2001). |
| Union Carbide Adhesion Promoters, Union Carbide A-174 Silane, 5 pages (Jan. 1968). |
| Union Carbide Electronics Division, Parylene Environmentally Compatible Conformal Coatings for Electronic Components Assemblies and Precision Parts, 14 pages (no date). |
| Union Carbide, Abrasion Resistance of Parylene and Other Conformal Circuit Board Coatings, Parylene Products, No. 4, 13 pages. (Oct. 1977). |
| Union Carbide, Adhesion Promotion Systems for Parylene, Parylene Products, No. 15, Revision 1, 8 pages (Oct. 1977). |
| Union Carbide, Adhesion Promotion Systems for Parylene, Technology Letter, No. 15, 13 pages (Oct. 1975). |
| Union Carbide, Evaluation of Parylene and Other Pellicles as Beam Splitters, Parylene Products, No. 8, Edited, 19 pages (Oct. 1977). |
| Union Carbide, Fluorescent Parylene Coatings, Parylene Products, No. 7 Revision 1, 8 pages (Oct. 1977). |
| Union Carbide, Fluorescent Parylene Coatings, Technology Letter, No. 7, 8 pages (Oct. 1973). |
| Union Carbide, Mechanical Protection Criteria for Thin Conformal Coatings, Parylene Products, No. 3, 21 pages (Oct. 1977). |
| Union Carbide, Method for Repair and Patching of Parylene Coated Printed Circuit Boards, Parylene Products, No. 2 Revision 1, 9 pages (Oct. 1977). |
| Union Carbide, Microencapsulation by Vapor Deposition, Parylene Products, No. 6, 12 pages (Oct. 1977). |
| Union Carbide, MIL I 46058, Qualification of Parylene N, C, and D, Parylene Products, No. 1 Revision 2, 8 pages (Oct. 1977). |
| Union Carbide, Parylene Bibliography, Parylene Products, No. 5, Revision 4, 17 pages (Jan. 18, 1982). |
| Union Carbide, Parylene Conformal Coatings for Hybrid Microelectronics, Parylene Products, No. 9, 23 pages (Oct. 1973). |
| Union Carbide, Parylene Pellicles for Space Applications, Parylene Products, No. 10, 50 pages (Oct. 1977). |
| Union Carbide, Parylene Pyrolysis Kinetics, Parylene Products, No. 11, 12 pages (Oct. 1977). |
| Union Carbide, Parylene Pyrolysis Kinetics, Technology Letter, No. 11, 12 pages (May 1974). |
| Union Carbide, Parylene Removal with Oxygen Plasmas, Parylene Products, No. 18, 7 pages (Aug. 1977). |
| Union Carbide, Printed Circuit Board Masking Techniques for Use with Parylene, No. 14, Revision 1, 11 pages (Oct. 1977). |
| Union Carbide, Solvent Resistance of the Parylenes, Parylene Products, No. 12, Revision 1, 5 pages (Oct. 1977). |
| Union Carbide, The Selective Removal of Parylene by Plasma Etching, No. 13, Revision 1, 7 pages (Oct. 1977). |
| Union Carbide, Thermal Endurance of the Parylenes in Air, Parylene Products, No. 16, 4 pages (Mar. 1976). |
| Union Carbide, Vapor Phase Adhesion Promotion Systems, Parylene Products, No. 17, Revision 1, 11 pages (Oct. 1977). |
| van Beusekom et al., Coronary Stent Coatings, Coronary Artery Disease, vol. 5, No. 7, pp. 590-596 (Jul. 1994). |
| van der Giessen et al., “Edge Effect” of 32 P Radioactive Stents is Caused by the Combination of Chronic Stent Injury and Radioactive Dose Falloff, Circulation, vol. 104, pp. 2236-2241 (Oct. 30, 2001). |
| Vapor Inc., Vapore-Jet™ Capillary Pump—How it Works, http://www.vapore.com/tech—howto.htm, printed Aug. 13, 2003, 2 pages. |
| Völkel et al., Targeting of immunoliposomes to endothelial cells using a single-chain Fv fragment directed against human endoglin (CD105), Biochemica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1663, pp. 158-166 (Apr. 15, 2004). |
| von Recum et al., Degradation of polydispersed poly(L-lactic acid) to modulate lactic acid release, Biomaterials, vol. 16, pp. 441-445 (1995). |
| Wiesendanger et al., Contributions of Scanning Probe Microscopy and Spectroscopy to the Investigation and Fabrication of Nanometer-Scale Structures, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 515-529 (Mar./Apr. 1994). |
| Wilensky et al., Methods and Devices for Local Drug Delivery in Coronary and Peripheral Arteries, Trends Cardiovasc. Med., vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 163-170 (1993). |
| Wong et al., An Update on Coronary Stents, Cardio, 8 pages (Feb. 1992). |
| World Precision Instruments, Inc., http://www.wpiinc.com/WPI—Web/Pumps/pneumatic—Fig.gif, printed Sep. 30, 2002, 1 page. |
| World Precision Instruments, Inc., Nanoliter Injector, http://www.wpiinc.com/WPI—Web/Microinjection/Nanoliter—Injector.html, printed Jun. 10, 2005, 3 pages. |
| World Precision Instruments, Inc., Nanoliter Injector, http://www.wpi-europe.com/products/microinjection/nanoliter.htm printed Jun. 10, 2005, 2 pages. |
| World Precision Instruments, Inc., Pneumatic PicoPumps, http://www.wpi.europe.com/products/microinjection/picopumps.htm, printed Jun. 10, 2005, 4 pages. |
| World Precision Instruments, Inc., Pneumatic PicoPumps, http://www.wpiinc.com/WPI—Web/Microinjection/Pneumatic—PicoPumps.html, printed Jun. 10, 2005, 4 pages. |
| Yau et al., Modern Size-Exclusion Liquid Chromatography, Wiley-Interscience Publication, 9 pages (1979). |
| Yokoyama et al., Characterization of physical entrapment and chemical conjugation of adriamycin in polymeric micelles and their design for in vivo delivery to asolid tumor, Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 50, pp. 79-92 (1998). |
| Yuen et al., Tissue response to potential neuroprosthetic materials implanted subdurally, Biomaterials, vol. 8, pp. 57-62 (Mar. 1987). |
| Zhmud et al., Dynamics of Capillary Rise, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 228, pp. 263-269 (2000). |
| Zimarino et al., Analysis of Stent Edge Restenosis with Different Forms of Brachytherapy, The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 89, pp. 322-325 (Feb. 1, 2002). |
| Zylberman et al., Comparative Study of Electroless Co(W,P) and Co(Mo,P) Thin-Films for Capping and Barrier Layers for Cu Metallization, 2002 Advanced Metallization Conference, 2 pages (no date). |
| USPTO, Office Action and Notice of References Cited, dated Apr. 6, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/184,722, filed Jul. 18, 2011, 13 pages total. |
| USPTO, Final Office Action dated Nov. 8, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/184,722, filed Jul. 18, 2011, 21 pages total. |
| USPTO, Office Action and Notice of References Cited, dated Mar. 22, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/184,696, filed Jul. 18, 2011, 13 pages total. |
| USPTO, Final Office Action and Notice of References Cited, dated Aug. 3, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/184,696, filed Jul. 18, 2011, 14 pages total. |
| USPTO, Office Action and Notice of References Cited, dated Apr. 2, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/184,726, filed Jul. 18, 2011, 12 pages total. |
| USPTO, Office Action and Notice of References Cited, dated May 24, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/184,726, filed Jul. 18, 2011, 7 pages total. |
| USPTO, Final Office Action and Notice of References Cited, dated Nov. 13, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/184,726, filed Jul. 18, 2011, 13 pages total. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120012053 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11418722 | May 2006 | US |
| Child | 13184712 | US |
