Patent Grant
8414477
This invention relates to apparatus and methods for catheterization and related treatments of the genitourinary and gastrointestinal passages of mammals. More particularly, this invention relates to catheters, dilators, occluders, stents, suprapubic catheters, camera introducers and related medical devices subject to being proximally propelled and directed for advancement and control in mammalian genitourinary and gastrointestinal passages.
In most mammals, mucous membranes line all those passages by which the internal parts communicate with the exterior, and are continuous with the skin at the various orifices of the surface of the body. The mucous membranes are soft and velvety, and very vascular, and their surface is coated over by their secretion, mucus, which is of a tenacious consistency, and serves to protect them from the foreign substances introduced into the body with which they are brought in contact.
Mucous membranes are described as lining the two primary mammalian tracts, i.e., the genitourinary and the gastrointestinal—and all, or almost all, mucous membranes may be classified as belonging to, and continuous with, the one or the other of these tracts.
Catheterization of any of these bodily passages may at times be useful or necessary.
Urinary outlet problems have presumably been around for as long as humans. History has the ancient Chinese using onion stalks to relieve people of acute urinary retention. Literature refers to such problems as far back as 206 B.C., more than 2000 years ago. The ancient Romans are known to have used catheters, which are believed to have been first invented by Erasistratus, a Greek doctor in the third century B.C. The Roman catheters were fine tubes made of bronze. The Roman gynecologist Soranus describes how catheters could be used to push stones out of the way and back into the cavity of the bladder, thus restoring urine flow. Excavations in Pompeii unearthed several bronze catheters. These instruments were well constructed but relatively simple and showed that catheter designs changed little from the period of 79 A.D. until around 1700 A.D.
However, during the 18th and 19th centuries, catheter construction became more complex, with an intensified search taking place for an appropriate substance that would be at once flexible, non-irritating and functional. England, France, and the United States all had individuals and companies deeply involved with urinary catheters during this period. Many variations were produced, but they all caused significant stress on the patient when these rigid devices were pushed into the urethra. The first practical breakthrough was made by the French using gum elastic catheters—a catheter that would bend better in the urethral channel and not scour the mucosa as much in the process.
Charles Goodyear improved upon what the French had produced when he successfully vulcanized crude rubber. The problem of manufacturing an instrument which was both sufficiently rigid to enable it to be pushed through the urethra and into the bladder, and yet flexible enough to negotiate the path, had at last reached the point of practicality, notwithstanding its shortcomings. At that time, and even to this day, a functional urethral catheter is frequently defined as being one that is flexible enough to negotiate the bends of the urethra and stable enough to be pushed through the length of the urethral passage.
The French urologist J. J. Cazenave, with the hopes that his country would regain leadership in the catheter field, dedicated 25-30 years of his life improving the flexible durable catheter. This effort was in the late 1800's and Cazenare's catheter, made of decalcified ivory, was a dated device, but it nonetheless shows the consistency of the state of the art wherein catheters are pushed into and negotiated along the urethral passage toward the bladder.
During the past 300 years or so, intensified catheter development efforts were stimulated by professional pride, national pride and financial rewards. These efforts yielded many improvements, such as changes to size, curve shape, materials of construction, smoothness, lubricants, coatings, combinations of materials, physical properties, chemical properties and more—yet all these improvements subscribed to the basic principle of external push-to-advance catheter deployment.
The catheters of the prior art are generally large and stiff, difficult and uncomfortable to administer, and uncomfortable to wear for extended periods of time. There is a degree of skill, tolerance and patience required from medical personnel installing the catheters that takes much time, training and practice to learn. The difficulty, discomfort, risk of injury and infection, inhibition and inconvenience of the methods and apparatus of the prior art results in the deprivation, for many patients, of the freedom to work, play and travel as do unaffected people.
The anatomy of the adult male urinary tract, as illustrated in
The normal process of emptying the bladder can be interrupted by two causes. One is bladder outlet obstruction, and the other is failure of the nerves linking the bladder to the brain. The most frequent cause of bladder outlet obstruction in males is enlargement of the prostate gland by hypertrophy or hyperplasia. In older males, it is not uncommon for a progressive enlargement of the prostate to constrict the prostate urethra. This condition, known as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), can cause a variety of obstructive symptoms, including urinary hesitancy, straining to void, decreased size and force of the urinary stream and, in extreme cases, complete urinary retention possibly leading to renal failure.
The most common surgical intervention for BPH, transurethral resection of the prostate, or TURP, has a lengthy recovery period of up to one year, and presents a high operative risk for complications such as sexual dysfunction. Up to 10% of those subjected to such surgery are left with mild to moderate stress incontinence. Approximately 400,000 patients in the United States, and approximately 500,000 patients internationally, were diagnosed in 1994 with BPH or cancer-induced bladder outlet obstructions that were sufficiently severe to warrant TURP or alternative surgery, according to industry sources.
Because of the high costs, medical risks and quality of life compromises associated with TURP, new technologies have begun to challenge TURP's position as the standard treatment for severe BPH. Recently, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved two drugs, tera zosin hydrochloride and rinasteride, to treat BPH. However, these drugs generally do not improve symptoms for six to nine months after treatment begins, and are not without side effects.
Urethral strictures are another cause of outlet obstruction, often due to fibrous tissue growth resulting from reaction to catheters or cystoscopes or from injury, birth defects or disease, and are commonly treated by urethral dilation, catheterization or surgery. Men with urethral strictures also experience a limited ability to urinate, which may cause extreme discomfort and, if left untreated, may cause complications that necessitate catheterization. Approximately 50,000 patients in the United States were diagnosed with recurrent urethral strictures in 1994, according to industry sources. It is estimated that approximately 75,000 additional patients were diagnosed internationally.
Women suffer from urinary incontinence (UI) far more often than men and at a younger age, primarily because of the stress associated with pregnancy and childbirth, the shorter length of the female urethra, and the absence of a prostate. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) estimates that the involuntary loss of urine affects approximately 10 million Americans, of which 8.5 million are women. Seven million of these women are non-institutionalized, or community-dwelling.
For women between the ages of 15 and 64, the prevalence of urinary incontinence is estimated to range from 10 to 25 percent of the population. For non-institutionalized persons over the age of 60, the prevalence of urinary incontinence ranges from 15 to 30 percent, with the prevalence in women twice that of men.
The involuntary loss of urine can be caused by a variety of anatomical and physiological factors. The type and cause of urinary incontinence is important to how the condition is treated and managed. The two broad categories of urinary incontinence are urge and stress incontinence. Some people suffer from what is termed mixed incontinence, or a combination of stress and urge incontinence.
Urge incontinence is the involuntary loss of urine associated with an abrupt and strong desire to void. In most cases, urge incontinence is caused by involuntary detrusor (the smooth muscle in the wall of the bladder) contractions or over-activity. For many people, urge incontinence can be satisfactorily managed with pharmaceuticals.
The more frequently occurring stress incontinence is the involuntary loss of urine caused by movement or activity that increases abdominal pressure. The most common cause of stress incontinence is hypermobility or significant displacement of the urethra and bladder neck during exertion. A less frequent cause of stress incontinence is intrinsic urethral sphincter deficiency (ISD), a condition in which the sphincter is unable to generate enough resistance to retain urine in the bladder.
Females, and males with no benign prostatic hyperplasia condition, might also have the inability to empty their bladder because of the nerves linking the bladder to the brain. This condition is known as neuropathic bladder, and may occur in a wide variety of conditions which include spina bifida, multiple sclerosis, spinal injury, slipped disc and diabetes. When these and other problems prevent the bladder from effectively controlling urine, there are a number of treatment options. They are catheters, dilators, occluders, and stents.
During continuous catheterization, an indwelling catheter is retained in the bladder by a water-filled balloon. The indwelling catheter drains urine continuously from the bladder into a bag which is attached to the leg or bed. The bag has a tap so that the urine can be emptied at intervals. The catheter is usually inserted by a doctor or nurse and changed about every four to six weeks. But difficulty in placement has always been inherent in this design. This is due to the traditional “push to advance” technology which necessitates a relatively stiff, thick-walled catheter to traverse the delicate mucosal-lined urethra.
Often the French (unit of measurement) size of the catheter is dictated by the need for stiffness to insert rather than the lumen size needed to pass urine. A 14 French or smaller Foley catheter is rarely used because catheters of this size lack the column strength needed to push the catheter along the full length of the urethra into the bladder.
The larger French Foley catheters are painful to place, uncomfortable when indwelling, and require a highly-skilled care provider to insert.
During intermittent catheterization, a simple catheter made of plastic, rubber, or metal is inserted by the patient or a helper for just long enough to empty the bladder completely, which is typically about one minute. These temporary catheters are usually smaller in diameter and stiffer than an indwelling catheter of the same size. This stiffness can make catheterization difficult in men because the male urethra is long and has an acute bend within the prostate. Also, when the external sphincter is reached, the sphincter muscle will contract, making passage difficult. Most patients learn to catheterize themselves and thereby gain a large degree of independence. This process is repeated about every 3-4 hours during the day and occasionally as needed at night.
Intermittent catheterization is mainly used by people who are incontinent due to a neuropathic bladder. Intermittent catheterization may also be utilized by people who cannot empty their bladder because the bladder muscle is weak and does not contract properly.
In some patients, an alternate apparatus and method used to maintain long term drainage of the bladder is the use of a suprapubic tube.
Suprapubic catheterization of the bladder is performed via transabdominal puncture which enters the body above the pubic arch and is directed into the bladder using ultrasound or fluoroscopy to guide the trocar introducer and suprapubic catheter. The trocar introducer is then removed when proper catheter placement within the bladder is confirmed, leaving the drainage catheter in place.
Long term drainage may require the fixation of the catheter at the skin using standard adhesive-based interface components to address mechanical fixation, infection control, and skin compatibility. The distal end of the catheter is commonly contained within the bladder by an inflated balloon, or by winged-shaped tip configurations which expand within the bladder, or by pre-shaped curved catheter tips which curl to their original J-shape when stiffening wire is removed from the catheter lumen.
A problem with this form of distal end emplacement through the bladder wall is that it is only unidirectional; that is, it only resists the inadvertent pulling out of the tip of the catheter from the wall of the bladder, while allowing the catheter to freely pass further into the bladder, and to back out up to the point of the containment structure. This continuing catheter motion in and out of the bladder puncture site may irritate tissue and cause infection or other difficulty at the bladder-catheter interface. Urine is especially irritating to most parts of the human body that are outside of the urinary tract.
Dilation is accomplished by pushing successively larger urethral dilation tubes through the urethra so as to increase the size of the urethral lumen, a procedure which is painful and traumatic to the patient. Surgical treatment of strictures involves surgical risks as well as complications, including infection, bleeding and restenosis, which frequently requires further treatment.
In general, the current art of dilators has also changed little over the passage of time. A shaft with an increasing taper, bulbous structure, or enlarged end is pushed from without the passage to advance the tool through the restricted passage, thus forcing, by longitudinally-applied pressure, the lateral expansion of the passage walls. This push-to-advance method necessitates a stiff shaft which has all the same limitations as traditional catheters. Catheters inherently provide a degree of this dilatorial function to the extent that the passage is opened sufficiently to accommodate the catheter.
Occluders are used in some cases to control incontinence. Occluders of the prior art are constructed and applied with the same push-to-advance concept as the catheters and dilators described above, and hence suffer from the same disadvantages. The basic occluder is a bulb or plug on a shaft which is inserted within the urethra to stop or prevent the normal flow of urine through the urethra, or driven all the way into the bladder, for example, and allowed to seat as a plug at the neck of the urethra to prevent the flow of urine from the bladder.
A stent is a tubular metallic mesh device that is implanted in to open and support a stricture so as to allow for urine flow. The stent body is between 3.5 cm and 6.5 cm in length, depending on the anatomy, and is expandable by design to anchor in place. The stent, being a mesh, has openings that allow the tissue to grow through the wall, making removal difficult and causing encrustation that reduces urine flow.
An intraurethral valved catheter is a device that is implanted to control the flow of urine by means of an integral valve that is remotely actuated. Since the entire catheter length is within the urethra, the chance for external infection is reduced. The anchoring mechanism of current designs is accomplished with balloons, or “petal-like” projections from the catheter. Both of the aforementioned designs are complicated to install and difficult to remove and, if the valve fails, leaves the patient in a painful and dangerous situation.
There has been patent activity in the prior art indicating dissatisfaction with the push-to-advance methodology. Catheters have been adorned with a wide assortment of spiral and threaded features described as intended to ease the trauma and pain of what clearly remained a push-in device. Alvord's U.S. Pat. No. 207,932, Peyret's French Pat. No. 564,832, Hayes' U.S. Pat. No. 1,644,919, and Jacoby's U.S. Pat. No. 1,888,349 are representative of these. In all cases, these disclosures fail to recognize that the basic push-to-advance technique is fundamentally flawed and should be abandoned, and fail to resolve the critical features of structure necessary for rotational advancement as a substitute for the push-to-advance method.
Other art reveals the use of spiral features for different purposes. For example, Spinosa's U.S. Pat. No. 3,815,608 discloses a catheter with a thread designed to hold the urethral wall away from the shaft so as to allow urine to flow around the outside of the catheter. Such disclosures likewise reveal a reliance on push-in methods, or an assumption that such structures can be pulled out without regard to the spiral features, again failing to recognize rotation as a viable substitute for pushing, and failing to resolve the critical features of structure necessary for effective rotational advancement.
As a further indication of the failure of the prior art to provide effective improvements to traditional push-in methods, there is no apparent indication among the products commercially available, or in the medical practices known to the Applicants, that any of these spirally-ornamented devices were ever found to be clinically viable.
The current device used for inspection and treatment of the GI (gastrointestinal) tract is a flexible endoscope. This device takes a high level of skill to use, is difficult to maneuver and can be very painful for the patient, due to the basic push-to-advance design that has not changed since the device was invented in the early 1960's. The distal tip of the endoscope typically has the following parts:
The so-called “bending section” is the distal end of the tube, ranging from approximately 8-15 cm long, which can articulate so as to steer the scope as it is pushed inward and is controlled by a cable mechanism that is connected to control knobs on the proximal handle.
The so-called “insertion tube”, which makes up the rest of the endoscope's 60-150 cm length, is not capable of controlled deflection. It has a tailored bending flexibility and torque transmission which is of major importance in endoscope design. Most instruments have a two-stage bending stiffness, i.e., the distal portion of the insertion tube is more flexible than the proximal portion. The flexibility of each portion of the insertion tube requires extensive clinical testing to ensure that the endoscope handles easily and produces a minimum of patient discomfort.
The colon is a tubular organ which runs from the cecum in the right lower quadrant to the rectum. It is widest in the cecum and ascending colon and gradually narrows as one approaches the rectum. The colon is divided into the following sections:
The inner layer of circular muscle is present throughout the colon. The outer longitudinal muscle in the wall of the colon is fused into three bands, the teniae coli. These bands start at the base of the appendix and run in the wall of the colon down to the rectum, where they diffuse into the muscular coat. The three teniae cause the colon to have a triangular appearance endoscopically; this is especially prominent in the ascending and transverse colon. The haustra are outpouchings of the colon, separated by folds. In the descending colon the endoscopic appearance is often tubular.
Most experienced colonoscopists use similar endoscopic techniques. Air is introduced to inflate the colon, but as little as possible to prevent overdistension. The pushing pressure on the endoscope is gentle to avoid stretching the colonic wall or mesentery (the connective tissue that holds the colon like a fan) which can cause pain, a vagal episode, or a perforation. The lumen is kept in view at all times; little or none of the examination is performed blindly, because the colonoscopist is pushing a stiff instrument through delicate tissue.
A variety of in and out maneuvers are used to “accordian” the colon on the colonoscope, keeping the colonoscope as free of loops as possible. In the difficult colon, special maneuvers such as the creating of an alpha loop in the sigmoid colon are used to pass the sharply angulated sigmoid/descending colon junction. This maneuver may require fluoroscopic guidance and training in the technique.
The colonoscope is advanced to the cecum under direct visualization. The detailed examination of the mucosa is usually performed as the colonoscope is slowly removed from the cecum.
To inspect the whole length of the large intestine requires a highly skilled practitioner, which makes the procedure costly. Even still, the procedure can be very painful for the patient, making sedation necessary. This is due to the inherent deficiencies in the “push-to-advance” design.
The small bowel, also known as the small intestine, is a long, coiled organ located in the center of the abdominal cavity. The small bowel is about 6 meters in length and it extends from the stomach and pyloric sphincter to the ileocecal valve, where it empties into the colon, or large intestine.
The small intestine is divided into the following sections:
a. the duodenum,
b. the jejunum; and
c. the ileum.
The walls of the small intestine are generally similar to, albeit somewhat more delicate than, the walls forming other portions of the digestive tract, such as the colon described above. The walls of the small intestine consist of a lining which is smooth in the duodenum, but which has folds and small projections thereafter, whereby to create the greater surface area needed for the enhanced absorption of nutrients.
Although the small intestine is much longer than the large intestine (typically 4-5 times longer), it has a much smaller diameter than the large intestine. On average, the diameter of the small intestine of an adult human measures approximately 2.5 to 3 cm in diameter, whereas the large intestine typically measures about 7.6 cm in diameter.
Due to the significant differences in both the diameters and lengths of the small bowel and the large bowel, traditional endoscopes and the methods used in large bowel applications are not ideal for investigating the small bowel. This is because of the need to gather (or pleat) the small bowel onto the endoscope, which is difficult to accomplish using traditional endoscopes. In addition to the foregoing, and as discussed above, the narrower small bowel also has a very delicate wall lining which is more susceptible to trauma than the lining of the colon.
Current approaches for accessing the small bowel generally utilize balloon devices which are advanced to, and into, the small bowel and then inflated. Once the device is inflated, the device is pulled proximally in order to gather a length of the small bowel onto the device, and then the device is deflated. The device is then advanced further into the small bowel and the process repeated as necessary so as to traverse the entire length of the small bowel. This process is extremely time-consuming for both the physician performing the procedure and the patient undergoing it. Keeping the length of the procedure as short as possible is important since the longer the small bowel tissue is gathered, or “pleated”, on the device, the higher the chances for tissue damage or tissue necrosis. Similarly, the longer the procedure, the greater the risk of anesthesia-related complications.
In view of the foregoing, traditional “push-to-advance” endoscopic designs and methods are less than ideal for small bowel applications, and thus there is a need for a novel approach for endoscopically investigating the small bowel.
In summary, there are problems in making present push-in catheters, dilators, and occluders stiff enough for penetration and flexible enough to make the turns without undue risk of trauma to the wall of the passageway when being pushed in; and once installed, comfortable enough to wear for an extended period of time. The problems with stent encrustation and removal are well known. Self-administration is inhibited by all of the short-comings of the prior art. Further injury, infection and discomfort can result from unskilled or improper technique. The problems with colonoscopy have been previously described.
The long history of push-in catheters/dilators and occluders has gradually crystallized into an industry-wide, self-perpetuating, fundamental assumption that catheters are to be mainly pushed through bodily passageways, albeit with some rotational easing. This “fact” is so widely perpetuated and pervasive in the commercially-available products and medical practices as to have stifled original thinking in this art. This, in spite of the well-recorded shortcomings of pain, trauma, risk of rupture, and failed, aborted or incomplete procedures, and the need for skilled practitioners and special equipment for monitoring and safeguarding against the inherent problems.
For the purposes of this disclosure, including the appended claims, the terms “distal”, “distally”, and “distal end”, as they relate to the devices and methods described herein, refer to the end of the device further from, or in the direction away from, a practitioner who might be applying the device or method to the subject. Stated otherwise, the aforementioned terms refer to the end of the device closer to, or in the direction towards, the subject's interior.
The terms “proximal”, “proximally”, and “proximal end”, as they relate to the devices and methods described herein, refer to the end of the device closer to, or in the direction towards, the practitioner who might be applying the device or method, rather than to the subject.
Objects of the invention include providing and employing screw-based means for rotational advancement and anchoring of catheters, probes, occluders, stents, and dilators into genitourinary and gastrointestinal passageways such as the urethra, ureter, esophagus and fallopian tube, and for the emplacement of suprapubic catheters for draining genitourinary organs such as the bladder, whereby the subject device is applied through a natural body orifice or surgically created opening and is drawn through the passage by the longitudinal pull of a helix on the walls of the passage or organ as the device is rotated. Objects of the invention also include gathering, or “pleating”, bodily passageways (such as the small bowel) on to the screw-based means so as to facilitate movement of the screw-based means relative to the bodily passageways.
This technology is a radical departure from the 4000 year old traditional “push-to-advance” methodology previously discussed.
Flexible, thin-wall indwelling and intermittent catheters and related devices and delivery stylets, made possible by this rotate-to-advance form of emplacement, are less traumatic and easier for the medical practitioner or patient to use. The catheter of the invention eliminates the problems of conventional devices by using helix or rotational technology that provides controlled insertion and flexibility to negotiate the urethra. The helix design accomplishes a pre-dilatation of the passageway at a steady rate that relaxes the sphincter and lessens or prevents spasm. Once placed, the device is anchored by the radial displacement and close pitch of the helix, preventing longitudinal migration due to body movement or fluid flow.
In another embodiment, the helix is located on the shaft under a Foley-type balloon and disappears when the balloon is inflated. The flexible, reinforced shaft need be only about half the wall thickness of conventional Foley catheters, which means a smaller outer diameter (OD) catheter can be used. The helix advances the shaft and dilates the urethra as the catheter is inserted. Once the bladder is reached, the balloon is inflated with sterile water, and the helix is engulfed by the balloon. The process is then reversed to remove the catheter. This technology fosters reduced costs for patent care, improved clinical outcomes and enhanced patient quality of life.
The continence catheter of the invention, indicated for bladder outlet obstructions, is intended for BPH patients who are not able to, or choose not to, undergo TURP. This embodiment of the invention allows the urethra in the area of the prostate to remain open. At the proximal (external) end of this catheter there may be a flow valve which can be depressed or otherwise opened to empty the bladder. The catheter may be produced as a sterile, single-use, disposable item that can be used once and replaced as needed.
The same embodiment of the catheter of the invention provides a female stress urinary incontinence (UI) sufferer with lifestyle benefits that greatly outperform absorbent products intended to manage this condition.
The patient simply inserts the catheter into the urethral opening and rotates the shaft to advance the catheter into the bladder. This can be done in the morning in the convenience of home. When the user needs to urinate, the valve end of the flexible shaft may be exposed through the clothing and the valve opened to empty the bladder. Since the device is not removed and reinserted after each voiding, the risk of infection is reduced. At the end of the day, the catheter is easily removed and disposed of.
The male or female intraurethral valved catheter of the invention is indicated for bladder control. This embodiment of the invention allows the flow of urine to be controlled by a valve mechanism that is within the catheter. This valve may be actuated directly by insertion of a tool such as a stylet, or remotely by using a magnetic field device.
The intraurethral device reduces the potential for infection by eliminating the external tubing which can be an entry path for bacterial contamination. These catheters are typically 3.5 to 6.5 centimeters in length, depending on the anatomy, and have the helical element of the invention on the outer diameter of the body. The thread height of the helix may vary over its length, as an aid to the advancement and retention characteristics of the device. The sidewall of the catheter may be reinforced to resist collapsing due to contraction pressure. This catheter may be inserted in the urethra under fluoroscopy, using a detachable flexible stylet which keys into the proximal end of the catheter in a non-rotational fitment, and may be inserted in an outpatient procedure using topical anesthesia.
The stent of the invention, indicated for bladder outlet obstructions, keeps the urethra open in the area of the stricture. The stent body may be between 3.5 cm and 6.5 cm in length, depending on the anatomy, and has a helical element on the outer diameter of the body to advance and retain the stent. The sidewall of the stent may have a reinforcement means to prevent collapsing due to prostate pressure. The stent can be inserted in the urethra under fluoroscopy, using a detachable flexible stylet which keys into the proximal end of the stent body, and may be inserted in an outpatient procedure using topical anesthesia.
The stents of the invention are not susceptible to being incorporated by the urethral mucosa in a manner preventing rotation, thereby permitting a lengthy period of emplacement and subsequent removal by the same rotational technique. The stent may also have a sufficiently large internal diameter, or lumen, to permit cystoscopies, thereby allowing examination of the bladder without removing the stent.
Helically-adapted dilators and occluders of the invention are likewise rotatingly advanced and retracted; the helical element performing a dilatory function to some degree. Dilators of respectively larger diameters may be used to achieve a gradually more pronounced effect.
The rotational advancement means may be combined with the push-to-advance methodology in any of these devices. In a dilator, for example, a helically-equipped leader shaft extending distally of the bulbous portion of the device rotatingly advances the device up to the point that the helix passes out of the interior end of the passage; the remainder of the leader shaft then providing a guidewire that leads the bulb through the remainder of the passageway when the dilator is pushed from the proximal end.
The adaptation of the invention to suprapubic catheters, used in a classic transabdominal puncture for the drainage of the bladder or other genitourinary organs, permits the helix on the distal end of the catheter to be emplaced in the wall of the organ far enough so that the helical vane extends from both sides of the organ wall, so that the longitudinal sliding motion of the catheter into and out of the organ is inhibited by the helical vane. This reduces a source of irritation and associated complications at the organ wall entry point.
The helically-adapted suprapubic catheter may be placed in the organ using ultrasound or fluoroscopy to visualize placement, by rotatingly advancing the catheter over a guidewire leading to the organ; the guidewire having been installed through a tubular access created by using a cannula and trocar to reach the organ, the trocar and the cannula having been successively removed.
Any embodiment of the invention may be radiopaque, or have radiopaque features, markers or other components, permitting the use of fluoroscopy to monitor emplacement or removal of the device, or even the rotational orientation and rotational movement of the device.
The thread element may be solid, hollow, or fluid-filled. It may taper in height at various locations to optimize advancement and anchoring. Embodiments or elements of the invention may be fabricated, molded, wound, extruded or otherwise constructed of non-toxic, non-corrosive materials, or combinations of materials, e.g., a composite construction, that are otherwise tolerant of bodily fluids and/or durable when implanted in vivo. Such materials may include, but are not limited to, polyurethane, medical grade stainless steel, silicone, bicarbon, polytetrafluoroethylene, tantalum, titanium, or nickel-titanium alloy. Conversely, materials may be specifically chosen to be bioabsorable so as to obviate the need for removal.
The devices of the invention may be enhanced with one or a combination of the following coatings: a water-based hydrophilic; antibacterial coatings such as nitrofurazone; bateriostatic coatings such as silver; or other mediations to further enhance their clinical performance.
The threaded camera introducer system, briefly stated, presents a novel means for the introduction of visualization sensors and other implements into and through the full length of a bodily passageway, e.g., the colon (for purposes of illustration, the threaded camera introducer system will sometimes hereinafter be discussed in the context of, and with specific reference being made to, the colon; however, it should be appreciated that the threaded camera introducer system also has application for use in other bodily passageways, e.g., the small bowel, and no limitation of use is intended to be inferred). The fundamental structure of the introducer, consistent with the rotate-to-advance structure and methodology of the invention, is a large, soft, flexible worm-like tubular device with a helix of soft, pliant threads which translate rotational force at the proximal end to a pulling action on the colon wall.
The hollow core or central lumen connects the distal and proximal ends of the tube. A camera head or other visual sensor can be introduced into the device and arranged to “see” forward from the center of the bulbous tip on the distal end. Light bundles or wires connected to the camera pass through the central lumen and out the proximal end of the device to an appropriate control and viewing apparatus.
The distal end of the device is gently urged into the rectum sufficiently far to engage the helix. The device is rotated from just outside the point of entry, to slowly advance into and through the entire length of the colon to the cecum. The helical threads pull the device gently along the interior colon wall; the flexibility of the device allows it to easily negotiate the major turns of the colon. The larger threads at the distal end provide the greatest grip or pull, the smaller threads closer to the proximal end contributing a lesser degree of grip or pull. The device is removed using the same method in reverse.
As illustrated in the figures, the light bundles or cables may be encased in a flexible torque tube or assembly which provides or contributes to the torsional strength necessary to rotatingly advance and withdraw the device.
The interior wall of the main tubular device or introducer may be configured to contain the torque tube or vertebra in a non-rotational manner, such that torque applied at any place on the exterior wall of the introducer is transmitted to the torque tube and hence over the full length of the device.
Various embodiments and enhancements are possible, all within the scope of the invention:
By means of the invention, the entire colon can be examined without the need for a conventional colonoscope or endoscope, and without the attendant expertise, pain, medication, post-procedure recovery time, and cost. The means and method of the invention require less training and have far greater likelihood of reaching the cecum (far end of the colon) than conventional tools and procedures.
Other body cavities and passageways may be similarly examined.
Among other things, the threaded camera introducer system can be used to gather, or “pleat”, bodily passageways (such as the small bowel) on to the threaded camera introducer system so as to facilitate movement of the threaded camera introducer system relative to the bodily passageway, whereby to facilitate visualization and/or treatment procedures.
The camera introducer catheter can be used in four different modes:
Thus, in one form of the invention, a conventional endoscope may be positioned within an introducer having a generally tubular construction with a helical thread on the exterior, whereby rotation of the introducer will cause the introducer, and hence the endoscope, to be moved longitudinally within a bodily passageway. And in one preferred form of the invention, the endoscope may be coupled to the introducer with a rotary coupling, such that the endoscope may remain free from rotation while the introducer is rotated, whereby to stabilize the endoscope image while the introducer is rotated.
And in another form of the invention, a conventional endoscope may be modified so as to provide helical threads along some or all of the exterior sidewall of the endoscope, such that upon rotation of the endoscope, the helical threads will move the endoscope longitudinally within a passageway.
It should be appreciated that the system of the present invention can be rotated either manually (e.g., by the surgeon rotating the catheter by hand) or, alternatively, the system can be power driven. In a preferred form of the present invention, a powered drive may be used to rotate the catheter so as to allow an easier and more precise advancement of the catheter into the bodily passageway or retraction of the catheter from the bodily passageway.
In one preferred form of the present invention, a lavage system may be provided for clearing away debris from the front of the catheter. In many situations, the bodily passageway receiving the catheter may be obscured with debris, and it may be helpful to have a clear view of the anatomy when advancing an endoscope through the bodily passageway. A lavage system may be provided to flush debris from the cavity passageway with fluid during the insertion of the endoscope. By way of example, the lavage system may be used to break up and remove fecal matter from the colon, thereby enabling a clearer view of the anatomy when the catheter is being advanced through the colon.
In one preferred form of the invention, there is provided a method for visualizing the interior of a bodily passageway at a remote location, the method comprising the steps of:
providing a visualization system for deployment in the bodily passageway, the visualization system comprising:
inserting the visualization system into the bodily passageway at a location remote from the site which is to be visualized;
rotating the plurality of concentric telescoping shafts so as to draw the bodily passageway onto the plurality of concentric telescoping shafts in a pleating fashion, whereby to bring the site which is to be visualized toward the visualization apparatus;
de-coupling the plurality of concentric telescoping shafts from one another;
rotating the innermost concentric telescoping shaft so as to draw the bodily passageway onto the innermost concentric telescoping shaft in a pleating fashion, whereby to bring the site which is to be visualized toward the visualization apparatus; and
using the visualization apparatus to visualize the interior of the bodily passageway.
In another preferred form of the invention, there is provided apparatus for visualizing tissue, the apparatus comprising:
a plurality of concentric telescoping shafts, the innermost of the plurality of concentric telescoping shafts being sized to receive visualization apparatus disposed within the lumen of that shaft; and
a helical thread disposed on the exterior surface of each of the plurality of concentric telescoping shafts, each of the helical threads having a sufficient structural integrity, and a sufficient surface profile, such that when the plurality of concentric telescoping shafts are disposed in a bodily passageway so that each of the helical threads engage the interior side wall of the bodily passageway, rotation of the plurality of concentric telescoping shafts will induce a relative movement between the plurality of concentric telescoping shafts and the side wall of the bodily passageway;
wherein the plurality of concentric telescoping shafts are configured so as to be selectively (i) coupled together so that they are rotated in unison with one another, and (ii) de-coupled from one another so that they may be rotated independently of one another.
In another preferred form of the invention, there is provided a method for accessing the interior of a bodily passageway at a remote location, the method comprising the steps of:
providing a system for deployment in the bodily passageway, the system comprising:
inserting the system into the bodily passageway at a location remote from the site which is to be visualized;
rotating the plurality of concentric telescoping shafts so as to draw the bodily passageway onto the plurality of concentric telescoping shafts in a pleating fashion, whereby to bring the site which is to be accessed toward the apparatus; and
rotating the innermost concentric telescoping shaft so as to draw the bodily passageway onto the innermost concentric telescoping shaft in a pleating fashion, whereby to bring the site which is to be accessed toward the apparatus.
In another preferred form of the invention, there is provided apparatus for accessing tissue, the apparatus comprising:
a plurality of concentric telescoping shafts, wherein each of the plurality of concentric telescoping shafts comprises a flexible tube; and
a helical thread disposed on the exterior surface of each of the plurality of concentric telescoping shafts, each of the helical threads having a sufficient structural integrity, and a sufficient surface profile, such that when the plurality of concentric telescoping shafts are disposed in a bodily passageway so that each of the helical threads engages the interior side wall of the bodily passageway, rotation of the plurality of concentric telescoping shafts will induce a relative movement between the plurality of concentric telescoping shafts and the side wall of the bodily passageway;
wherein the plurality of concentric telescoping shafts are configured so as to be selectively rotatable (i) in unison with one another, and (ii) independently of one another.
Still other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become readily apparent to those skilled in this art from the following detailed description, wherein there are shown and described preferred and other embodiments of the invention by way of illustration of the best mode contemplated for carrying out the invention. As will be realized, the invention is capable of other and different embodiments, and its several details are capable of modifications in various obvious respects, all without departing from the invention.
To those skilled in the art, the invention admits of many variations and appellations in apparatus and methodology. By way of example, there is provided, in accordance with the present invention, a rotate-to-advance structure and methodology applicable to a range of medical devices that have heretofore relied entirely or substantially on a push-to-advance technique for penetration of bodily passages. Such devices include catheters, dilators, and occluders for mammalian genitourinary or gastrointestinal passages such as the urethra or ureter for the usual purposes associated with such devices where no incising or rupture of passage walls or membranes is intended.
Referring now to
Referring to
It is readily apparent from the dimensions of
The diameter of the helix formed by thread 103 of catheter 101 is referred to as thread diameter 103d, and is equal to two thread heights 103b plus the outside diameter 102d of catheter tube 102 or, in this case, 2 times 0.032 inches plus 0.125 inches, or approximately 0.19 inches. The circumference C of the helix formed by thread 30 is calculated as Π (pi) times thread diameter 103d or, in this case, 3.14 times 0.19, or approximately 0.6 inches.
C=π×thread diameter 103d
The ratio R of thread pitch 103c, 0.25 inches, to the circumference of thread diameter 103d, at 0.6 inches, is much less than 1 to 1, thereby improving the leverage of the screw thread for converting rotation into longitudinal pulling power, as compared to ratios larger than 1/1.
The shoulders of thread 103 have a radius of 0.015 inches. In small quantities, thread 103 may be attached to tube 102 by wicking tetrahydrofuran (THF) solvent under the thread using a fine hollow tube. Catheter 101 may be molded in large quantities with thread 103 being an integral part of the molded structure.
Referring to
Both ends of thread 103 are tapered from zero to full height in one-half turn of the helix, to facilitate gentle, gradual displacement of urethra wall 2 by thread 103 when catheter 101 is rotated clockwise for advancement into the urethra and counterclockwise for retraction. The difference between thread height 103b and pitch 103c shown in
Referring to
It is apparent from the anatomy shown in
A useful alternative embodiment of catheter 101 incorporates the recited external thread 103 for rotational advancement, but provides for the central lumen to connect to or terminate in a straight-through or axially-aligned drainage port at the distal tip of the catheter, similar to the most basic conventional catheters. This is likewise useful for drainage and also enables the insertion or passage of guidewires or other devices where specific procedures require it.
Referring next to
Referring to
It is readily apparent from
Similar to the description of threaded catheter 101, the diameter 113d of the helix formed by thread 113 is equal to two thread heights 113b plus the diameter 112d or, in this case, 2 times 0.10 plus 0.125, or approximately 0.33 inches. The circumference C of the helix formed by thread 113 is calculated as Π (pi) times the thread diameter 113d or, in this case, 3.14 times 0.33, or approximately 1.0 inches. The ratio R of thread pitch 113c, at 0.25 inches, to the circumference C, at 1.0 inches, is again much less than 1 to 1, thereby improving the leverage of the thread for converting rotation into longitudinal pulling power as compared to larger ratios.
The shoulders of thread 113 have a radius of 0.015 inches. Catheter 111 may be constructed or fabricated by the same means as catheter 101.
Referring to
Referring to
The optimal position for threaded catheter 111 for draining the bladder of a female subject is where it is advanced through the urethra until the thread passes out of the urethra into the bladder, similar to how catheter 101 is illustrated in
A detailed method for the self-administration of the appropriate respective threaded catheter 101 or 111, or other similar threaded devices, will now be explained.
First, the user assembles materials including a sterile threaded catheter 101 or 111, a container for urine, soap and water, a water soluble lubricant (if the catheter is not pre-lubricated), a mirror (for females), and tissues. The user will then wash the hands and urethral opening with soap and water, squeeze out a small amount of lubricant into clean tissue, dip the distal end tip of the catheter into the lubricant, and manually engage the tip of the catheter into the urethral opening (the mirror may be helpful for females to assist in locating the opening).
The user will then gently push and turn the catheter in, far enough to engage the thread about one full turn with the urethra, and then gently rotate the tube of the catheter in the direction of the thread, preferably clockwise, to advance the catheter into the urethra until urine appears in the tube. The user then pauses to drain the bladder, directing the urine into the container, then resumes rotation of the catheter until it is no longer advanced by the rotation, indicating that the thread of the catheter has passed into the bladder and the catheter is in proper position.
The user then places a flow control device on the proximal end of the catheter and empties the bladder periodically as required. The catheter is removed, when appropriate, using similar precautions for cleanliness and containment, by rotating the catheter in a direction opposite the direction of insertion, presumably counterclockwise.
Referring next to
The flexible shaft 132 of stylet 131 is sufficiently strong such that when it is fully inserted into catheter 121, shaft 132 will withstand and transmit torque, as applied by finger force to knurled knob grip 133 external of the urethra, to the thread 123. Stylet 131 is removed after catheter 121 is installed, and reinserted for retracting the catheter when required.
Fitment 124 is an elongated collar with a multi-faceted interior wall, securely anchored within tube 122, and configured to receive, in a non-rotational relationship, tip 134. Tip 134 is configured with a corresponding elongated, multi-faceted exterior shape and rounded end, to readily enter fitment 124. Stylet tip 134 and fitment 124 can be alternatively configured and connected by various means to provide a non-sliding, as well as non-rotational, connection.
Referring next to
Balloon 150, when uninflated, is normally contracted tightly about helical element 143 as illustrated in
Referring now to
Dilator 201, of
Occluder 211, of
Occluder 221, of
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring to
Referring now to
Alternative embodiments may have a section of the thread being tapered to a lesser height or no height, to provide a “waist” for gripping by a muscular zone such as the prostate or sphincter. Also, a portion of reinforcement member 370 could be configured or molded into the side wall of tube 362.
There is an interior shoulder 364 at the distal end 365 of catheter 361, and a bushing 367 of relatively harder material disposed proximal to interior shoulder 304. Bushing 367 has a tapered interior wall 368 extending from the bushing's full diameter at one end to a uniform hexagonal aperture 369.
A coiled sidewall reinforcement member 370 and a check ball 371 are secured between interior shoulder 364 and bushing 367 so that coiled member 370 holds ball 371 in compression against the upper (proximal) end of bushing 367 in the manner of a check valve, whereby to prevent outward (proximal) flow through the lumen 372 of the stent. Coiled member 370 may be compressed by upward movement of ball 371, thereby opening the check valve to flow.
Referring next to
Referring now to Figs. and 25-29, the threaded suprapubic catheter 401 of
Referring to
Referring to
Suprapubic catheter 401 is then threaded over the proximal end of guidewire 423, and gently started into the abdomen wall 21 with a rotating motion of about one turn until thread 403 is firmly engaged. The catheter is then rotatingly advanced along the guidewire through the unlined pathway in the same manner as other threaded devices of the invention, until thread 403 penetrates the wall of organ 31 about one full turn, as determined by ultrasound, fluoroscopy or equivalent means. The distal end of catheter 401 is then secured in a non-rotatable fashion to abdomen wall 21 using conventional adhesive means or equivalent means, thereby locking thread 403 at the distal end of the catheter in position in the wall of organ 31. Guidewire 423 is then withdrawn. Threaded suprapubic catheter 401 is then available for use.
Referring to
Referring next to
Still referring to
An alternative embodiment of the introducer 500 may have a relatively diminutive tip, but maintain an external thread of equal or greater height and total circumference. Another variation of introducer 500 may have thread 503 applied only to the introducer's distal end, the thread terminating after a few turns, e.g., approximately 8 inches or less, analogous to catheter 101 of
A thread major diameter in the range of 0.5 inches to 2.5 inches, and more preferably 1 inch to 2 inches, is desirable to expand and engage the walls of the colon of the adult intestinal tract to a sufficient depth to achieve a useful grip by the thread in accordance with the rotate-to-advance technology of the invention. For other bodily passageways, other thread major diameters may be used. If desired, a trailing portion of the helical thread may have a lower thread height. The relatively lower thread height of the continuing thread may be employed to assist in the rotational advancement of the trailing length of the device without exerting undue forward pressure on the distal end.
It will be further apparent, consistent with the techniques, structure and methodology of the invention, that the thread pitch 503c, is designed to produce the necessary leverage to translate rotational effort at the proximal end to a forward force greater than the friction against the wall of the colon or other bodily passageway. Simple vector analysis confirms this result.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring next to
As will be realized, the invention is capable of other and different embodiments, and its several details are capable of modifications in various obvious respects, all without departing from the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention may be further realized and attained by means of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims. Accordingly, the drawings and description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature, and not as restrictive.
In
However, with the aforementioned assembly of (i) threaded camera introducer catheter 500 and (ii) camera assembly 520, camera assembly 520 is secured, both longitudinally and rotationally, to threaded camera introducer catheter 500, e.g., by means of set screw 512 (
First, if camera assembly 520 is rotated during passage through a bodily passageway, e.g., the colon, the image observed by the medical practitioner (on either a video monitor or through an eyepiece) will also be rotating. This rotation can make it difficult for the medical practitioner to effectively use the visualization provided by the camera assembly during passage through the colon. At the very least, this rotation makes it difficult for the medical practitioner to maintain their sense of direction (i.e., up/down/left/right) during deployment. This latter point is significant, since the medical practitioner frequently relies on their sense of spatial orientation in order to navigate a tortuous passageway such as the lower GI tract. Stabilizing this image electronically requires complex additional circuitry and/or computer software in an already-costly scope and image processor system.
Second, if camera assembly 520 is rotated during passage through the colon, the camera assembly's umbilage connections (e.g., light, electrical, fluid, etc.) become complex. By way of example but not limitation, in such a situation, water connections to the distal end of the endoscope must be designed to rotate freely about the axis of the endoscope, with a leak-proof seal, etc. Again, this can add significant cost and complexity to an already costly and complex endoscope system.
The aforementioned issues are addressed by a new threaded camera introducer catheter which has a rotary coupling at its distal and/or proximal ends (and, if desired, at one or more intermediate locations) which is free to rotate relative to the body of the introducer. This new camera introducer catheter is installed over the distal end the endoscope, with the distal and/or proximal ends (and, if desired, one or more intermediate portions) of the endoscope being secured to the rotary coupling. Due to the fact that the endoscope is attached to the camera introducer catheter by means of the rotary coupling, the camera introducer catheter is free to rotate about its axis while the endoscope remains rotationally stationary.
This new arrangement allows the camera introducer catheter to rotate about its longitudinal axis, whereby to advance or retract the introducer (and hence the endoscope) within a bodily passageway, e.g., the colon; at the same time, however, inasmuch as rotation of the camera introducer catheter is not transferred to the endoscope, the endoscope (and hence all of its associated input and output connections) remains rotationally stationary. As a result, the new camera introducer catheter allows the medical practitioner to hold the proximal end of the endoscope in the customary manner, i.e., rotationally fixed, while deploying the endoscope using the rotate-to-advance methodology of the present invention. This is a significant advance in the art.
Looking next at
In one form of the invention, camera introducer catheter 600 is preferably substantially the same as the camera introducer catheter 500 described above, except for the provision and use of one or more rotary couplings 605 which will hereinafter be discussed in further detail. More particularly, camera introducer catheter 600 generally comprises a tube 610 upon which is formed a helical thread 615. Tube 610 has sufficient rigidity that rotation applied to the proximal end of the tube will be transmitted to the distal end of the tube; at the same time, tube 610 also has sufficient flexibility that the tube may bend around curves in the colon. Furthermore, helical thread 615 has a geometry such that when the camera introducer catheter 600 is positioned within the colon, rotation of the proximal end of the catheter will cause helical thread 615 to pull the camera introducer catheter 600 along the colon, in the rotate-to-advance fashion of the present invention.
As referred to above, camera introducer catheter 600 includes one or more rotary couplings 605. In one preferred form of the invention, a rotary coupling 605 is rotatably attached to the distal end of tube 610, such that the rotary coupling may rotate freely about the axis of the tube while being fixed, longitudinally, to the tube. Additional rotary couplings 605 may be disposed along the length of tube 610 and endoscope 700.
Preferably camera introducer catheter 600 is constructed so as to minimize friction between rotary coupling 605 and tube 610 when tube 610 is rotated. For example, low friction bushings or bearings may be used, and/or appropriate lubricants and/or coatings may be applied to contacting surfaces.
The joinder between tube 610 and/or endoscope 700 and/or rotary coupling 605 may be sealed to prevent fluid infiltration. This is particularly important at a distal end of the construction which is the portion most exposed to fluid ingress. A design addressing this feature may include labyrinth, point-contact and wiper configurations. See, for example,
The camera assembly or endoscope 700 is intended to be secured to rotary coupling 605 so that the endoscope will be longitudinally fixed to camera introducer catheter 600 but free to rotate relative to the camera introducer catheter. By way of example but not limitation, camera assembly or endoscope 700 may be mounted to rotary coupling 605 by means of a set screw 630 which causes a protective ring liner 635 into binding engagement with endoscope 700. Access to set screw 630 may be through an opening 640 in tube 610.
As a result of the foregoing construction, camera assembly or endoscope 700 may be secured to one or more rotary couplings 605 of camera introducer catheter 600 whereby, when the camera introducer catheter 600 is thereafter placed within the colon and the proximal end of the catheter's tube 610 is rotated, the distal end of tube 610 will turn, whereby helical thread 615 will pull the catheter (and hence endoscope 700) distally along the colon. At the same time, however, inasmuch as rotary coupling 605 is free to rotate with respect to tube 610, endoscope 700 will remain rotationally stationary with respect to the rotating catheter. In this way, endoscope 700 may be advanced within the colon using the rotate-to-advance technique of the present invention, without requiring any corresponding rotation of the endoscope itself. As a result, the medical practitioner will be able to maintain effective visualization of the colon as the endoscope is advanced (or retracted, with reverse rotation) within the colon. Furthermore, inasmuch as the endoscope per se does not to rotate, the endoscope's umbilage connection (e.g., light, electrical, fluid, etc.) are significantly simplified.
If desired, threaded camera introducer catheter 600 may be provided with multiple rotary couplings, with the additional rotary couplings being positioned anywhere along the length of catheter 600. By way of example but not limitation, and looking now at
Furthermore, if desired, threaded introducer catheter 600 may include design features designed to maximize the tortional stiffness of its tube 610 while minimizing bending stiffness of the tube. By way of example but not limitation, and looking now at
The threaded camera introducer catheter 600 may also include a feature to disconnect the rotary coupling 605 from the endoscope while the catheter 600 is deployed within the body. This disconnect may be effected via fluid, mechanical, electrical or other means. See, for example,
It should also be appreciated that threaded introducer catheter 600 may be used to deploy objects other than an endoscope 700. For example, introducer catheter 600 may be used to deploy other visualization apparatus (e.g., ultrasound devices) and other objects which have umbilage associated therewith, e.g., a fluid dispenser apparatus, a vacuum snare, surgical instruments, etc.
Looking next at
It should be appreciated that endoscope 770 may be secured within corrugated tube 715 so that the distal end of the endoscope projects out of the distal end of corrugated tube 715, so as to expose the angulation portion of the endoscope beyond the distal end of corrugated tube 715. Alternatively, endoscope 770 may be secured within corrugated tube 715 so that the distal end of the endoscope projects substantially beyond (e.g., greater than 6 inches or so) the distal end of corrugated tube 715.
In another form of the invention, and looking now at
The treatment of cancerous growths with brachytherapy is well documented. One approach is to surgically implant radioactive material into the cancerous growth in order to position the radiation source as close as possible to the target tissue. Such implantation can be difficult and time-consuming to effect. Furthermore, if the need subsequently arises to modify the radiation dosage or to limit the exposure to only a short time period, the implantation process can be difficult to reverse.
Thus, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided novel apparatus for effecting brachytherapy, that is, for directing radioactive material to a target site within the body, while allowing for easy implantation and removal.
Such novel brachytherapy apparatus may be cannulated or non-cannulated, depending on the anatomy which is to be targeted.
By way of example but not limitation, in one preferred application of the novel brachytherapy apparatus, the device may be used for the treatment of prostate cancer where the radioactive material must be delivered to the region of the affected prostate gland. In this case, it will generally be desirable to use a cannulated form of the present invention to effect delivery of the radioactive material.
More particularly, in this case, the novel brachytherapy apparatus may comprise a stent such as the stent 301 shown in
By way of further example but not limitation, in another preferred application of the novel brachytherapy apparatus, the device may be used for the treatment of breast cancer, where the therapeutic radiation must be delivered to the breast. In this case, it may be desirable to use a non-cannulated form of the invention.
More particularly, in this case, the novel brachytherapy apparatus may comprise a threaded solid element such as the dilator 201 shown in
It is also anticipated that the radioactive materials RM of the aforementioned brachytherapy stent 301 and/or the aforementioned brachytherapy dilator 201 may be replaced by a therapeutic agent capable of leaching out of the wall of the delivery device and thereby be delivered to the target tumor. Additionally, the therapeutic agent may be coated onto a wall of the delivery device for delivery to the target region.
Looking next at
Conduit fitting 800 generally comprises a body 805 and an obturator 810. Body 805 has a helical thread 815 formed on its distal end, and an enlarged flange 820 formed on body 805 proximal to helical thread 815. A central lumen 825 extends the length of body 805. A fluid valve 830, preferably in the form of one or more deformable seals, is disposed at the distal end of the device so as to selectively close off lumen 825.
Obturator 810 is sized to fit within, and close off, lumen 825 of body 805. In addition, obturator 810 is adapted to drivingly engage body 805, whereby rotation of obturator 810 may be converted into corresponding rotation of body 805. By way of example but not limitation, obturator 810 may be drivingly connected to body 805 by an obturator pin 835 which engages a pair of body ears 840.
In one contemplated manner of use, a small hole is first made into a corporeal conduit, e.g., a blood vessel. The distal end of body 805, with obturator 810 in place, is then inserted into the hole. Next, obturator 810 is turned so as to cause body 805 to turn, whereupon thread 815 will pull the distal end of body 805 into the interior of the blood vessel. Engagement of flange 820 with the outer surface of the blood vessel will prevent further movement of body 805 into the blood vessel. Engagement of flange 820 can also assist in sealing the blood vessel against leakage. To this end, flange 820 may comprise a compliant seal and/or may comprise a thrombogenic agent. Obturator 810 may then be removed; however, blood will not pass out of the proximal end of body 805 due to the presence of fluid valve 830. Thereafter, when instruments or the like are to be introduced into the blood vessel by means of body 805, they may be pushed through the fluid valve 830 and lumen 825.
When access to the blood vessel is no longer required, body 805 may be backed out of the blood vessel, e.g., by reinserting obturator 810 into body 805 so that obturator pin 835 engages body ears 840, and then appropriately turning the distal end of the obturator so as to unscrew body 805 from the wall of the blood vessel.
Body 805 is preferable absent of perforations so as to minimize any ingrowth of tissue into the body, which may render subsequent removal more difficult. Additionally, various materials and/or coatings may be used to minimize tissue ingrowth to body 805.
Visual examination of the large intestine (colonoscopy) is performed by passing a colonoscope, retrograge, the entire length of the intestine, starting at the rectum and advancing to the cecum.
Standard practice is to lubricate the colonoscope and the entry site (i.e., the anal sphincter) prior to inserting the colonoscope with a combination of push-and-quarter turn twisting motion.
This insertion can be especially challenging where the patient is not relaxed and the sphincter muscle is held tightly closed. Hemorrhoids can also cause discomfort when the instrument is advanced into the anal sphincter. Also, to the extent that a helically-threaded introducer (such as the threaded introducer catheter 500 described above) is used to deploy the endoscope, the presence of the introducer's helical threads can add to the challenge of inserting the colonoscope into the rectum.
To this end, and looking now at
In use, obturator 910 is first positioned in lumen 907 of liner 905, and then the assembly is inserted into the rectum. Once access device 900 is inserted in the rectum, obturator 910 is removed, thereby providing a tubular access into the rectum. Then the colonoscope (with associated threaded introducer catheter 500 if desired) can be passed freely into the rectum.
Liner 905 may or may not have a helical thread or other surface geometry on the exterior of the tube to help advance the liner into the rectum or to help keep it in place. Additionally, liner 905 may be designed with a feature to cause it to split so it can be easily removed from the procedure site once the colonoscope has entered the rectum.
In one preferred form of the present invention, and looking now at
The powered drive 1010 can be detachably attached to the threaded catheter 1005 either before or after the initial insertion of the threaded catheter 1005 into a bodily passageway. Furthermore, the powered drive 1010 may be placed anywhere along the length of the threaded catheter 1005. In one preferred form of the invention, the power drive is placed at the proximal end of the threaded catheter.
The energy input to the powered drive 1010 may be one source or a combination of sources. By way of example but not limitation, the energy source may comprise electrical, hydraulic, pneumatic, ultrasonic, magnetic and/or other energy sources. It should be appreciated that these energy sources may be disposed anywhere along the length of catherization system 1000, or they may be remotely located. The energy from the energy source(s) may be transmitted to the rotating helix via a permanent or detachable coupling mechanism. This coupling mechanism is preferably used in conjunction with the rotary bearing mechanism disclosed above.
The powered drive 1010 may be constructed in a configuration which minimizes its external size so as to accommodate the body orifice that the device is traversing. Additionally, the powered drive 1010 may include “coreless motors” or “coreless drive mechanisms” which may provide a lumen for passing tools, fluids, optical devices, etc. through the threaded catheter to the surgical site.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the powered drive 1010 may be controlled directly by the physician using user controls 1015 (see
Significantly, the aforementioned switching device may also be designed to reverse the direction of catheter rotation (i.e., clockwise vs. counterclockwise) so as to control advancement and retraction of the rotary introducer within the bodily passageway.
In another preferred embodiment of the invention, the aforementioned switching device may also incorporate a “throttle” feature so as to allow the user to vary the speed of catheter rotation, as well as a force feedback output so as to give the physician an indication of the amount of resistance the device is encountering as it advances into the bodily passageway. Such a feature may constitute a safety measure that may prevent high rotational forces from being inadvertently applied to the threaded catheter, thereby minimizing risk of injury to the patient.
It will be appreciated that if it is necessary to advance a portion of the powered drive 1010 (or even the entirety of the powered drive 1010) into a bodily passageway during use of the present invention, a small diameter powered drive 1010 should be used.
The powered drive 1010 may be designed so as to be cleanable and reuseable, or powered drive 1010 can be disposable.
It should be appreciated that the powered drive 1010 may be used in a system additionally comprising conduits extending through the threaded catheter for air/water/suction and tool passage (as described hereinabove and/or hereinbelow).
It should also be appreciated that the powered drive 1010 may be used with imaging devices which deliver data through the catheter shaft via fiberoptic cables or electrical signals. Alternatively, the image signals could be transmitted from the distal end of the catheter to a remote receiver so as to eliminate the need for an electrical connection. Similarly, the powered drive 1010 may also be remotely controlled via a wireless connection.
In another embodiment of the present invention, it is possible to utilize two counterwound helical sections that rotate in opposite directions so as to eliminate the need for the torsionally rigid spline. This embodiment may be constructed with an integral power supply and drive mechanism, and a mechanized surgical tool which is remotely controlled (i.e., wireless), and a wireless image transmitter so as to enable an untethered instrument. This instrument could be driven into a bodily lumen and perform a diagnostic or therapeutic procedure, all via wireless (e.g., remote) control.
A small diameter helical catheter 1005 may be utilized to access other bodily passages such as the mammalian ducts, bile ducts, or other areas of the body where a flexible shaft approach is advantageous.
To properly examine and treat conditions of the lower gastrointestinal tract, the patient typically undergoes a purging to remove fecal matter. If this procedure is not conducted successfully, it is generally very difficult to visualize the bodily passageway clearly. This is highly undesirable, since anatomical abnormalities may be hidden from the endoscope.
In current procedures, the preparation of the patient involves consuming a large volume of liquid and a purging agent such as magnesium citrate. This causes the desired flushing of the intestines, but it is also accompanied by unpleasant cramping for hours after consumption. Patients have complained that this is one of the worst parts of undergoing flexible endoscopy. In fact, this unpleasant procedure deters some patients from undergoing colon endoscopy. It should also be noted that the alternative, i.e., a colonic enema, is generally not adequate to clear the lumen prior to endoscopy.
To overcome the foregoing deficiencies, a rotate-to-advance catheter system 1100 (
In one embodiment of the invention, to aid the colon cleaning process, jets may be disposed at the indwelling tip of the threaded catheter so as to produce an increased velocity of fluid entering the bodily passageway. Additionally, these jets may be aimed back into the suction lumen to create an increased suction to remove fecal matter.
It should be appreciated that the lavage system described hereinabove may be used in connection with the camera introducer described hereinabove, and/or it may be used in any procedure requiring the insertion of a surgical apparatus into a bodily cavity in which cleaning of the cavity is advantageous.
Looking next at
In one preferred form of the present invention, the urological stent 1200 comprises (i) an implant component 1205 (i.e., the stent), (ii) a delivery element 1210 (i.e., the element which delivers the implant component into position), (iii) a connect/disconnect element 1215 (i.e., the element which allows the delivery and/or retrieval elements to interface with the stent), and (iv) a retrieval element 1220 (i.e., the element which enables removal of the stent from the body).
The stent implant of the present invention may comprise a preformed “J” shape, a balloon and/or protrusions 1225 (a balloon 1225 is shown in
The delivery is facilitated by providing a helix 1235 on the stent to advance the stent and the trailing delivery system to the proper location. The proper location can be confirmed by urine flow, i.e., urine will flow once the stent extends to the bladder. Alternatively, traditional imaging methods can be used to confirm location (e.g., x-ray, ultrasound, etc.). When the stent is properly located within the urethra, adjacent to the prostate and on the bladder side of the external sphincter, the stent is disconnected from the delivery element 1210.
Connecting and disconnecting of the stent 1200 from the delivery 1210 and/or retrieval elements 1220 may be conducted via wireless signal, push/pull of a wire or cable, inflation/deflation of a balloon or bladder, screwing/unscrewing of threaded elements, thermal expansion/contraction, swelling/shrinking, on/off tapered elements, magnetizing/demagnetizing, wrapping/unwrapping elements, sticking/unsticking, grabbing/releasing and/or other methods which will be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of the present disclosure. In this respect it should be noted that the shape of the connect/disconnect elements 1215 are generally non-circular, and may be hexagonal, square, triangular, slotted, star-shaped, hole-with-detent, etc.
It should be noted that during use, metal or non-metal tethers 1240 may be kept in place at the time of delivery so as to thereafter function, if necessary, as a guide for connecting the retrieval element 1220 to the stent for removal of the stent 1200. The retrieval element 1220 is guided to the stent by a guide wire which is advanced to the stent 1200 in advance of the retrieval element 1220.
In one preferred form of the present invention, the stent may be disassembled or separated into two or more pieces before removal.
Looking next at
In one preferred form of the present invention, the fallopian catheter 1300 comprises a body 1305 having helical threads 1310 formed thereon. Body 1305 and helical threads 1310 are sized for disposition in a fallopian tube.
Looking next at
Camera introducer system 710A is generally similar to camera introducer 710 discussed above, except that it is specifically configured to be used in small bowel applications, in either antegrade or retrograde fashion, as will hereinafter be discussed in further detail.
More particularly, the helical thread of camera introducer system 710A is preferably provided with a semi-ovoid cross-sectional thread profile, i.e., the “mailbox” shape shown in
Furthermore, if desired, the helical thread may be formed so as to be partially deformable when engaging tissue, so as to provide a more compliant and less traumatic engagement with the tissue, e.g., during a rotate-to-advance procedure or during a rotate-to-pleat procedure. In other words, the helical thread may be constructed so that it will deform to some extent when it engages the tissue, whereby to form a more compliant and less traumatic engagement with the tissue. Of course, while the helical thread is partially deformable, it must still retain a sufficient structural integrity to advance the camera introducer system through the anatomy (in a rotate-to-advance procedure) or to pleat the small bowel tissue onto the corrugated tube (in a rotate-to-pleat procedure). By way of example but not limitation, this “partially deformable” thread characteristic may be provided by forming the helical thread with a hollow configuration. See
In addition to the foregoing, and because camera introducer system 710A may be advanced using an antegrade approach rather than a retrograde approach, the proximal end of the camera introducer system is specially configured so as to be more appropriate for the application and less traumatic to the patient. More particularly, in order to reduce trauma to the patient's throat, the proximal end of camera introducer system may be fitted with an atraumatic jacket at the location where the proximal end of the camera introducer system will contact the throat during the procedure.
In use, in an antegrade small bowel procedure, camera introducer system 710A is advanced down the esophagus, through the stomach and into the small bowel. See
Once in the small bowel, and looking next at
By gathering the pleated tissue of the small bowel onto the camera introducer system 710A, it is possible for the physician to more efficiently traverse the approximately 6 meters of small bowel, which would be impractical using traditional small bowel endoscope delivery systems.
Once the camera introducer system has been advanced to a desired location within the small bowel, or to the furthest accessible point within the small bowel, nut 755A can be unlocked by un-screwing it proximally. This opens collet fingers 745A, and hence elastomeric ring 765A, thereby releasing endoscope 770A from corrugated tube 715A. Endoscope 770A can thereafter be extended out of the corrugated tube 715A and advanced further into the small bowel. Providing camera introducer system 710A with this extendable endoscope feature can be particularly advantageous in difficult to traverse cavities such as the small bowel.
It should be appreciated that camera introducer system 710A significantly shortens the length of time required for the physician to access and traverse the small bowel. By having the small bowel tissue gather in a pleating fashion along helical threads 735A, the surgeon is able to advance the apparatus through the small bowel in less than half the time required by traditional devices and methods. This is significant, as shortening procedure time (i) reduces the length of time that the delicate small bowel tissue is pleated on itself (and hence subject to damage or necrosis), (ii) reduces the total length of time that the patient needs to be under anesthesia, and (iii) allows physicians to perform more of these procedures for other patients in need.
In another form of the present invention, and looking next at
More particularly, in one preferred form of the present invention, novel camera introducer system 710B comprises an inner shaft S (
Inner shaft S and outer shaft S′ can be rotated as a unit, in which case they will gather and pleat small bowel tissue in the manner discussed above. However, when desired, outer shaft S′ can be held in a non-rotating condition while inner shaft S is rotated, so as to advance inner shaft S further distally of outer shaft S′. This mode of operation can be achieved in a variety of ways. By way of example but not limitation, inner shaft S and outer shaft S′ can be formed so as to have a high coefficient of friction between the shafts, whereby rotation of one shaft (e.g., inner shaft S) normally causes rotation of the other shaft (e.g., outer shaft S′). However, when it is desired to rotate inner shaft S independently of shaft S′, so as to advance inner shaft S relative to outer shaft S′, a lubricant can be injected between the two shafts (e.g., via a port P), whereby to de-couple (i.e., release) the inner shaft S from the outer shaft S′. When inner shaft S is rotated independently of outer shaft S′, the first helical thread 735B and second helical thread 735B′ will be spaced from one another, e.g., in the manner shown in
In use, camera introducer system 710B is placed into its aforementioned first position (i.e., so that first helical thread 735B and second helical thread 735B′ are substantially continuous) and advanced to the small bowel in the same manner as camera introducer system 710A. Once camera introducer system 710B is advanced into the small bowel, the two shafts are rotated as a unit so as to cause helical threads 735B and 735B′ to gather, and pleat, small bowel tissue over inner shaft S and outer shaft S′. When no further small bowel tissue can be pleated onto outer shaft S′, inner shaft S is de-coupled from outer shaft S′, e.g., by injecting a lubricant between inner shaft S and outer shaft S′ so as to release the inner shaft from the outer shaft. Rotation of the inner shaft thereafter causes the inner shaft to advance relative to the de-coupled outer shaft, i.e., so that camera introducer system 710B assumes its aforementioned second position in which first helical thread 735B and second helical thread 735B′ are spaced from one another. This action causes camera introducer system 710B to gather and pleat additional small bowel tissue over the telescoped inner shaft.
In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, a different coupling mechanism may be employed on the proximal end of camera introducer system 710B in order to provide the desired coupled/de-coupled rotational function (i.e., the ability to selectively couple or de-couple motion of inner shaft S and outer shaft S′ from one another. By way of example but not limitation, a mechanical or electrical coupling/de-coupling mechanism can be used to selectively control rotation of shafts S and S′.
The foregoing preferred embodiments of the present invention may include a number of additional designs which can improve the effectiveness of the rotate-to-advance catherization system. These additional designs may relate to the helical thread construction.
As noted above, the thread height of the helix may vary over its length as an aid to the advancement and retention characteristics of the device (see, for example, helix 1400 disposed on shaft 1405 in
In accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention, the helix may be constructed with at least two different thread pitches along the length of a device so as to produce different tissue (or material) movement relative to the device (see, for example helix 1400 disposed on shaft 1405,
In another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the thread surface of the helix may be constructed with protrusions and/or recesses on the surface so as to improve advancement or anchoring of a device (see, for example,
If desired, this geometry may be encapsulated within bioabsorbable or temporary material to change the surface geometry after insertion within the body. See, for example,
The thread cross-section may also be non-symmetrical with respect to the vertical centerline to enhance the advancement or anchoring within a bodily lumen. The shape may be designed to allow the thread to deflect in a beneficial manner so as to improve performance.
As noted above, the thread element may be solid, hollow and/or fluid-filled. It may be constructed with rigid, elastomeric, or a combination of materials. By way of example but not limitation, the thread elements may be formed out of PVC, polyurethane, TPE, silicone, TFEs, medical grade stainless steel, tantalum, titanium, nickel-titanium alloy, etc. Conversely, materials may be specifically chosen to be bioabsorable so as to obviate the need for removal of the thread element of the helix. Alternatively, the thread element may be constructed out of at least two materials having different properties so as to obtain desired composite properties, such as, for example, hardness, friction, compliance, and/or radiopacity.
In another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the helix device may comprise one or more sensors so as to indicate conditions such as temperature, pressure, radiation, position and/or any other status for diagnostic or therapeutic treatment during the procedure.
In another preferred embodiment of the present invention, a coupling may be fixed to the endoscope or device with a variety of methods. The attachment force may be, for example, mechanical, hydraulic, pneumatic, magnetic, and/or adhesive. Or a radial force design may be used, utilizing a deformable element to create a frictional clamping, which can be reversed to unlock the coupling. A coupling may be provided which incorporates a uni-directional clutch to permit rotation in a single direction (i.e., clockwise only or counterclockwise only). In one embodiment, the clutch direction may be changed by the operator to facilitate advancement in one direction and withdrawal by rotating in the opposite direction. In another embodiment, a one-way override clutch may utilize a wrapped left-handed spring. This will allow the device to be advanced and the clutch disengaged for withdrawal by unwinding the spring a fraction of a turn to increase the ID and prevent gripping. Other commonly known clutch designs could also be integrated within the coupling.
An ergonomic grip or grips may be incorporated into the length of the catheter system to facilitate rotation of the helical device. These grips may be permanent or temporary, such as peel-away, so they can be removed or relocated during the procedure. The grips may be elastomeric or rigid and sized to fit comfortably in the hand. They may also be integrated with a powered drive within the grip.
It will be appreciated that still further embodiments of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of the present disclosure. It is to be understood that the present invention is by no means limited to the particular constructions herein disclosed and/or shown in the drawings, but also comprises any modifications or equivalents within the scope of the invention.
This patent application: (i) is a continuation-in-part of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/189,561, filed Jul. 26, 2005 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,806,888 by James J. Frassica for ROTATE TO ADVANCE CATHETERIZATION SYSTEM; (ii) is a continuation-in-part of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/121,751, filed May 4, 2005 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,909,799 by James J. Frassica for ROTATE-TO-ADVANCE CATHETERIZATION SYSTEM; (iii) is a continuation-in-part of pending prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/363,990, filed Feb. 28, 2006 by James J. Frassica et al. for ROTATE-TO-ADVANCE CATHETERIZATION SYSTEM; (iv) is a continuation-in-part of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/437,979, filed May 19, 2006 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,780,650 by James J. Frassica et al. for ROTATE-TO-ADVANCE CATHETERIZATION SYSTEM; (v) is a continuation-in-part of pending prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/152,926, filed May 19, 2008 by James J. Frassica et al. for ROTATE-TO-ADVANCE CATHETERIZATION SYSTEM; and (vi) claims benefit of prior U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/127,840, filed May 17, 2008 by Stephen Tallarida et al. for ROTATE-TO-ADVANCE CATHETERIZATION SYSTEM. The six above-identified patent applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 207932 | Alvord | Sep 1878 | A |
| 761235 | Kepler | May 1904 | A |
| 1644919 | Hayes | Oct 1927 | A |
| 1888349 | Jacoby | Nov 1932 | A |
| 2173527 | Agayoff | Sep 1939 | A |
| 2896629 | Warr | Jul 1959 | A |
| 3428046 | Remer et al. | Feb 1969 | A |
| 3815608 | Spinosa et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3897751 | Gullino et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
| 4445509 | Auth | May 1984 | A |
| 4452546 | Hiltebrandt et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4577621 | Patel | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4646738 | Trott | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4655752 | Honkanen et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4670008 | Von Albertini | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4682981 | Suzuki et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4696544 | Costella | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4728319 | Masch | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4731554 | Hall et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4732154 | Shiber | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4759346 | Nakajima | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4762128 | Rosenbluth | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4762130 | Fogarty et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4763671 | Goffinet | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4773497 | Carlson et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4807593 | Ito | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4819634 | Shiber | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4834724 | Geiss et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4842579 | Shiber | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4883458 | Shiber | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4886490 | Shiber | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4893623 | Rosenbluth | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4894051 | Shiber | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4927412 | Menasche | May 1990 | A |
| 4935025 | Bundy et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4950232 | Ruzicka et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4955859 | Zilber | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4957482 | Shiber | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4969450 | Chinnock et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4979939 | Shiber | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4994032 | Sugiyama et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5002553 | Shiber | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5007896 | Shiber | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5009643 | Reich et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5019121 | Krauter | May 1991 | A |
| 5041082 | Shiber | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5047040 | Simpson et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5054501 | Chuttani et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5059169 | Zilber | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5087252 | Denard | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5129906 | Ross et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5129910 | Phan et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5135531 | Shiber | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5147376 | Pianetti | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5188093 | Lafferty et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5197482 | Rank et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5217474 | Zacca et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5246441 | Ross et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5246445 | Yachia et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5271380 | Riek et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5273545 | Hunt et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5279567 | Ciaglia et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5292332 | Lee | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5300035 | Clement | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5306244 | Shiber | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5308354 | Zacca et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5313934 | Wiita et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5324270 | Kayan et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5334211 | Shiber | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5339800 | Wiita et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5342301 | Saab | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5364372 | Danks et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5368014 | Anapliotis et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5368558 | Nita | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5396880 | Kagan et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5405320 | Twardowski et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5415634 | Glynn et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5431151 | Riek et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5439478 | Palmer | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5443443 | Shiber | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5443481 | Lee | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5456685 | Huebner | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5478329 | Ternamian | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5486155 | Muller et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5489256 | Adair | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5496289 | Wenstrom, Jr. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5505736 | Reimels et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5522831 | Sleister et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5523092 | Hanson et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5527336 | Rosenbluth et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5538509 | Dunlap et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5540707 | Ressemann et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5544993 | Harle | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5551443 | Sepetka et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5554119 | Harrison et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5556382 | Adams | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5569195 | Saab | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5571085 | Accisano | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5575757 | Kennedy et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5577654 | Bishop | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5582575 | Heckele et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5588948 | Takahashi et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5601537 | Frassica | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5624392 | Saab | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5630805 | Ternamian | May 1997 | A |
| 5653696 | Shiber | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5662673 | Kieturakis | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5671748 | Itoi | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5672158 | Okada et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5720706 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5720723 | Adams | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5728066 | Daneshvar | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5730744 | Justin et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5746720 | Stouder, Jr. | May 1998 | A |
| 5752971 | Rosenbluth et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5755697 | Jones et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5762603 | Thompson | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5797836 | Lucey et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5836951 | Rosenbluth et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5843092 | Heller et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5868665 | Biggs | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5871474 | Hermann et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5871475 | Frassica | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5882344 | Stouder, Jr. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5897535 | Feliziani et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5902268 | Saab | May 1999 | A |
| 5961490 | Adams | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5964732 | Willard | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5971967 | Willard | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5976165 | Ball et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5989230 | Frassica | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5997526 | Giba et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6010449 | Selmon et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6027522 | Palmer | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6048332 | Duffy et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6053860 | Brooks | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6080170 | Nash et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6086530 | Mack | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6106485 | McMahon | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6106538 | Shiber | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6129706 | Janacek | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6156046 | Passafaro et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6190353 | Makower et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6209886 | Estes et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6210397 | Aboul-Hosn et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6221060 | Willard | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6224608 | Ciccolella et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6245040 | Inderbitzen et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6258060 | Willard | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6264618 | Landi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6264633 | Knorig | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6379334 | Frassica | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6398725 | Thompson | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6398794 | Hinshaw | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6436100 | Berger | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6440158 | Saab | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6447488 | Estabrook et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
| 6450988 | Bradshaw | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6451036 | Heitzmann et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6451037 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6464631 | Girke et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6471637 | Green et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6478776 | Rosenman et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6511471 | Rosenman et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6517518 | Nash et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6517519 | Rosen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6551300 | McGaffigan | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6565588 | Clement et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6589213 | Reydel | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6589262 | Honebrink et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6595982 | Sekino et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6623449 | Paskar | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6623509 | Ginn | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6623516 | Saab | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6638266 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6656134 | Cornelius et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6663655 | Ginn et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6666874 | Heitzmann et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6692431 | Kazakevich | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6695767 | Martinez Garcia et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6695774 | Hale et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6730105 | Shiber | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6755826 | Valencic et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6767355 | Frova et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6776945 | Chin et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6805898 | Wu et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6808531 | Lafontaine et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6817976 | Rovegno | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6830577 | Nash et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6843793 | Brock et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6845259 | Pacetti et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6846319 | Ginn et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6852095 | Ray | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6869393 | Butler | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6890343 | Ginn et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6896671 | Vitullo et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6896692 | Ginn et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6899674 | Viebach et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6905505 | Nash et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6905510 | Saab | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6913594 | Coleman et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6916286 | Kazakevich | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6921362 | Ouchi | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6926725 | Cooke et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 7005026 | Brustad et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7011655 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7018372 | Casey et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7025758 | Klint | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7048711 | Rosenman et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7048717 | Frassica | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7056294 | Khairkhahan et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7070586 | Hart et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7104979 | Jansen et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7122001 | Uchiyama et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7128862 | Wang | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7172610 | Heitzmann et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7182757 | Miyata et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7192396 | Boulais | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7201738 | Bengmark | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7207980 | Christian et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7232423 | Mernoe | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7686824 | Konstantino et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7806857 | Khosravi et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 20010016730 | Martins et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010044619 | Altman | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020026175 | Paskar | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020045855 | Frassica | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020072730 | McGill et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020132076 | Stevens | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20030060802 | Omaleki et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135198 | Berhow et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030204169 | Howell et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030236505 | Bonadio et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040054335 | Lesh et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040059292 | Hisamatsu et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040087885 | Kawano et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040092892 | Kagan et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040127940 | Ginn et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040158229 | Quinn | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040186543 | King et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040193139 | Armstrong et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040220549 | Dittman et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040236180 | Uchiyama et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040236310 | Chin et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040236346 | Parker | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040249360 | Spehalski | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040254544 | Russell | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050038410 | Friedman et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050049509 | Mansour et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050059957 | Campbell et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060030 | Lashinski et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050070879 | Coyle et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050070880 | Varma et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050085696 | Uchiyama et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050096502 | Khalili | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050096607 | Beck | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050096723 | Nash et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113631 | Bolling et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050119613 | Moenning et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050137581 | Azar | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050159647 | Hart et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050159727 | Lesh | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050197533 | May et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050203339 | Butler et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050214723 | Feygin et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050228224 | Okada et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050228479 | Pavcnik et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050256429 | Long et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050256504 | Long et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050256505 | Long et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050256506 | Long et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050256507 | Long et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050256508 | Hall | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050267442 | Von Oepen | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050272976 | Tanaka et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050273076 | Beasley et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060091585 | Kelley | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060206002 | Frassica et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20070005041 | Frassica et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070059989 | Kura et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2103994 | Mar 1994 | CA |
| 23 11 807 | Sep 1973 | DE |
| 92 03 077.7 | Sep 1992 | DE |
| 1 852 052 | Nov 2007 | EP |
| 564832 | Jan 1924 | FR |
| 11-28249 | Feb 1999 | JP |
| 2006 034627 | Feb 2006 | JP |
| WO 0108572 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| WO 0123027 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| WO 2005087082 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006090599 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Gray, Anatomy, Descriptive & Surgical, 1977, pp. 98-1001, 1004-1007, 1026-1027, Crown Publishers. |
| James et al., Ancient Inventions, 1994, pp. 15-16, Ballantine Books. |
| Hoffman-Larducue, Perspective in Urology, Pub. of American Urological Assoc., 1976, pp. 117-134. |
| Rex, D.K. et al., Quality indicators for colonscopy, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2006, S16-S28, vol. 63, No. 4. |
| Gatto, N. M. et al., Risk of Perforation After Colonoscopy and Sigmoidoscopy: A Population-Based Study, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Feb. 5, 2003, pp. 230-236. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100076264 A1 | Mar 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61127840 | May 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12152926 | May 2008 | US |
| Child | 12467732 | US | |
| Parent | 11437979 | May 2006 | US |
| Child | 12152926 | US | |
| Parent | 11363990 | Feb 2006 | US |
| Child | 11437979 | US | |
| Parent | 11189561 | Jul 2005 | US |
| Child | 11363990 | US | |
| Parent | 11121751 | May 2005 | US |
| Child | 11189561 | US |
