Embodiments of the invention relate generally to brush seals and, more particularly, to a rotating brush seal attached to a rotating component wherein the bristles of the brush seal are angled axially, more than circumferentially.
Known brush seals are typically mounted or attached to a stationary component of a turbomachine, where only the flexible bristle tips of the brush seal engage a rotating component during operation of the turbomachine to form a dynamic seal. Known brush seals also typically include bristles that are angled circumferentially with respect to the rotating component.
In one embodiment, the invention provides a brush seal for use between a rotating component and a stationary component in a turbomachine, the brush seal comprising: a set of bristles having a fixed end and a free end, wherein the fixed end is attached to the rotating component, and wherein the set of bristles are angled axially at an axial angle with respect to the rotating component.
In another embodiment, the invention provides a turbomachine comprising: a rotating component; a stationary component; and a brush seal for use between the rotating component and the stationary component, the brush seal comprising: a set of bristles having a fixed end and a free end, wherein the fixed end is attached to the rotating component, and wherein the set of bristles are angled axially at an axial angle with respect to the rotating component.
These and other features of this invention will be more readily understood from the following detailed description of the various aspects of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings that depict various embodiments of the invention, in which:
It is noted that the drawings of the invention are not necessarily to scale. The drawings are intended to depict only typical aspects of the invention, and therefore should not be considered as limiting the scope of the invention. In the drawings, like numbering represents like elements between the drawings.
Turning now to the drawings,
As illustrated by angle, a, in
Turning to
As shown in
As referenced above, embodiments of this invention include a brush seal 100 having a fixed end 112 mounted, or attached to, rotating component 102.
In a second example, shown in
In a third example, shown in
In a fourth example, shown in
In any of the embodiments discussed herein, retaining plate 116 can be integrally machined into rotating component 102 or can comprise a separate element that is welded or otherwise attached to rotating component 102. If retaining plate 116 is integral to rotating component 102, as discussed herein, an entry groove/slot (similar to slot 128 shown in
In another embodiment, shown in
Regardless of how brush seal 100 is mounted to rotating component 102, the axial angle of the set of bristles 110 of brush seal 100 assists in allowing brush seal 100 to seal effectively. Since brush seal 100 rotates with rotating component 102, if the set of bristles 110 were angled substantially circumferentially, the centrifugal loading would tend to straighten the bristles out and cause bending stress at the root of the bristles. In addition, if the set of bristles 110 are allowed to straighten out, the bristles will not move inward easily, and can buckle or be damaged when brush seal 100 moves toward stationary component 104 during rotor excursion or vibration. Therefore, a large cant angle is not desirable for rotating brush seal 100 according to embodiments of this invention.
Therefore, as discussed herein, the set of bristles 110 is not angled substantially circumferentially as in prior art brush seals, but rather is mainly angled axially, and is supported by conical retaining plate 116. This is further illustrated in
As also shown in
In one embodiment of the invention, the pressure loading is from left to right referring to
The axial angle of the set of bristles 110 can be set to achieve desired flexibility without requiring excessive axial space. In one embodiment, the set of bristles 110 can be angled in an axial direction with respect to rotating component 102 at an axial angle of approximately 15 degrees to approximately 70 degrees, for example, at approximately 30 to 45 degrees.
As discussed herein, a circumferential angle of the set of bristles 110 is not necessary to make brush seal 100 flexible. However, a small circumferential angle, substantially less than the axial angle, may be beneficial for seal 100, not for flexibility reasons, but for operability, for example, in the range of approximately 0 to 15 degrees. Therefore, a small cant angle in a circumferential direction can be used, where the set of bristles 110 will contract owing to the cant angle, opening up clearance between seal 100 and stationary component 104 at no or low speed to avoid rub during transient. As speed goes up to operating condition, the set of bristles 110 will stretch out, reducing the cant angle, thus closing up the gap between the tips of the set of bristles 110 and stationary component 104.
An additional benefit of brush seal 100 according to embodiments of this invention is that the heat generated by brush seal 100 will not cause rotor bowing like conventional brush seals because the bristle tips slide on stationary component 104. The heat generated by the rubbing of the tips of the set of bristles 110 on stationary component 104 will partly go into stationary component 104 and partly be taken away by leakage through the set of bristles 110. Therefore, there is little to no heat going into rotating component 102. In contrast, in conventional brush seals, the bristle tips rub the surface of the rotating component, which heats up the rotating component directly. This heating of the rotating component can cause the rotating component to bow and further increase undesirable non-uniform heating.
As shown in
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the disclosure. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any related or incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal language of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
885032 | Ferranti | Apr 1908 | A |
2878048 | Peterson | Mar 1959 | A |
3917150 | Ferguson et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
4595207 | Popp | Jun 1986 | A |
5029875 | Spain et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5090710 | Flower | Feb 1992 | A |
5316318 | Veau | May 1994 | A |
5425543 | Buckshaw et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5496045 | Millener et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5752802 | Jones | May 1998 | A |
5799952 | Morrison et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5944320 | Werner et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5961280 | Turnquist et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5997004 | Braun et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010132 | Bagepalli et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6012723 | Beeck | Jan 2000 | A |
6131910 | Bagepalli et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6161836 | Zhou | Dec 2000 | A |
6173962 | Morrison et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6226975 | Ingistov | May 2001 | B1 |
6293553 | Werner et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6308959 | Sokolihs et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6318728 | Addis et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6352263 | Gail et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6488471 | Stibich et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502823 | Turnquist et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6505834 | Dinc et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6547522 | Turnquist et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6550777 | Turnquist et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6622490 | Ingistov | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6695314 | Gail et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6786488 | Laurello et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6840518 | Boston | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6880829 | Datta | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7032903 | Dalton et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7165771 | Beichl et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7168708 | Dalton et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7182345 | Justak | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7201378 | Kono | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7255352 | Adis et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7384235 | Adis | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7410173 | Justak | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7445212 | Gail et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7445424 | Ebert et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7461847 | Short et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7549835 | Brillert | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7565729 | Adis et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7628581 | De Simone et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7653993 | Couture et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7717671 | Addis | May 2010 | B2 |
7909334 | Beichl et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8075254 | Morgan et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8317464 | Alamsetty et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
20020050684 | Kono | May 2002 | A1 |
20030151207 | Shore | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040100033 | Tong et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050073106 | Thermos et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050110218 | Morrison et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050111967 | Couture et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050179207 | Datta | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050194747 | Morgan et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050285345 | Webster | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060021218 | McMillan | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060214378 | Zheng | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060249911 | Kowalczyk et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070018409 | Justak | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070069478 | Riggi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070079493 | Couture et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070096397 | Justak | May 2007 | A1 |
20070120327 | Justak | May 2007 | A1 |
20070214628 | Adis et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070245532 | Bracken et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080095616 | Alvanos et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080258403 | Beichl et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080284107 | Flaherty et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080309019 | Wolfe et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090050410 | Berberich | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090072486 | Datta | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090196742 | Turnquist et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090322028 | Wright et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100034644 | Scricca | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100054924 | Uyama et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100064499 | Couture et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100068042 | Bruck et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100320696 | Gail et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20130277918 | Fitzgerald et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1066480 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1130294 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1169585 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1235010 | Aug 2002 | EP |
1269048 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1312840 | May 2003 | EP |
1331423 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1353097 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1388695 | Feb 2004 | EP |
1391642 | Feb 2004 | EP |
1508671 | Feb 2005 | EP |
1510655 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1715223 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1783406 | May 2007 | EP |
1918523 | May 2008 | EP |
1947297 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2052171 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2005061587 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2005337448 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007139045 | Dec 2008 | JP |
2008064260 | Oct 2009 | JP |
9942704 | Aug 1999 | WO |
0045070 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0155625 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0175339 | Oct 2001 | WO |
2005001316 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2005091994 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2005091994 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2007070071 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2008020002 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2008094761 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2009010040 | Jan 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Holloway et al., “Rotating Intershaft Brush Seal for Sealing between Rotating Shafts, Part I—Experimental Performance Evaluation Compared to Mechanical Design Analysis”, 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Jul. 8-11, 2007, Cincinnati, OH, AIAA 2007-5732, 19 pages. |
Mehta et al., “Rotating Intershaft brush Seal for Sealing between Rotating Shafts Part II—Experimental Data Evaluation and Modeling of the Brush Seal Leakage Flows”, 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit Jul. 8-11, 2007, Cincinnati, OH, AIAA 2007-5733, 16 pages. |
Holloway et al., Innovative Rotating Intershaft Brush Seal for Sealing Between Rotating Shafts Part I—Mechanical Design of The Rotating Brush Seal, 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit Jul. 9-12, 2006, Sacramento, California, AIAA 2006-4751, 21 pages. |
Mehta et al., “Innovative Rotating Intershaft Brush Seal for Sealing Between Rotating Shafts Part II—Modeling of Brush Seal Leakage Flows”, 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Jul. 9-12, 2006, Sacramento, California, AIAA 2006-4752, 14 pages. |
Peters, Office Action Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/987,052 dated Jul. 18, 2013, 13 pages. |
Peters, Office Action Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/987,052 dated Dec. 3, 2013, 10 pages. |
Peters, Office Action Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/987,052 dated Jan. 30, 2014, 16 pages. |
Peters, Office Action Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/987,052 dated Feb. 27, 2014, 11 pages. |
Peters, Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 12/987,052 dated Apr. 8, 2014, 14 pages. |
Lattime, S.B., et al., Rotating Brush Seal, International Journal of Rotating Machinery, 8(2): 153-160 (2002). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120251303 A1 | Oct 2012 | US |