This invention relates to wear protectors for rotating drill pipes used in oil and gas exploration or recovery, and more particularly to rotating drill pipe protectors, those that are fixed to the rotating drill pipe and rotate with the drill pipe during use.
When drilling oil and gas wells with rotary drilling equipment, the drill pipe frequently comes into contact with the well casing, resulting in wear to both the casing and the drill pipe. In addition, the friction between the drill pipe and casing may result in significant torque and drag, which can exceed the capability of the rig's drive system. Drill pipe protectors are commonly known in the industry. They generally comprise a protective sleeve made from a non-abrasive material secured to the drill pipe. The sleeve is positioned on the drill pipe so that the sleeve can contact the wall of the well casing or bore to prevent damaging contact between the rotating drill pipe and the casing or bore.
The prior art includes use of various types of rotating and non-rotating drill pipe protectors. The most prevalent rotating protector design uses a wedge-shaped stamped steel “wedge pin” which is driven into the hinge to close the protector around the drill pipe. Non-rotating drill pipe protectors (NRDDPs) are disclosed in several U.S. patents held by Western Well Tool, Inc. (WWT), including U.S. Pat. No. 5,069,297 to Krueger et al. These patents disclose techniques for producing a fluid bearing effect between the sleeve and the drill pipe so that the drill pipe can rotate relative to the protective sleeve during use.
The present invention is directed to rotating drill pipe protectors (RDPPs). These protectors are rigidly affixed to the drill pipe so they can rotate with the drill pipe during use. Generally speaking, these drill pipe protectors can be of lower cost than NRDPPs, particularly for use on land-based rigs. They can be effective in offering protection in applications involving moderate side loads. RDPPs must be designed to generate a substantial circumferential gripping strength that minimizes axial slippage between the sleeve and the drill pipe in response to side loads caused by contact forces between the sleeve and the well casing or bore during use. Low grip strength around the pipe can frequently result in the protector slipping on the pipe; and when the protectors move away from their installed position, they become ineffective at preventing wear. Also, problems are caused by the inability to strip through pressure control equipment, such as diverter assemblies, rotating pressure control heads, and BOPs, due to low grip strength. Once the protector has slipped, its structural integrity is too often inadequate to prevent serious failure of the protector, resulting in debris in the well.
The previously mentioned stamped steel wedge pin design produces low holding forces and leaves a significant portion of the pin remaining above the protector where it can hang-up on obstructions.
A frequent problem offshore is in drilling with a riser in deep water. Drill pipe in these conditions may wear the riser, well head, and BOP equipment at significant cost and rig downtime. Use of rotating protectors, properly positioned, can prevent such damage and economic loss. However, this is an extremely demanding application, requiring large holding forces for RDPPs.
The present invention provides a rotating drill pipe protector that resists slippage by a protector sleeve attachment and fastener assembly having improved gripping strength. Other improvements also are provided. One area of improvement has to do with preventing buckling of the drill string during use.
Buckling of drill pipe has been and remains a serious problem to drilling by reducing the drilling penetration, damaging drill pipe, and sometimes preventing reaching the reservoir. The typical indication of buckling is the buckled pipe preventing placing load onto the drill bit, thus preventing drilling. Buckling of drill pipe is typically described by the buckling load, i.e., the load when the pipe buckles.
The buckling load is affected by many parameters including length of the drill pipe between tool joints, drill pipe diameter, tool joint diameter, diameter of casing or open hole, the eccentricity of the drill pipe within the casing, the fluid (weight and lubricity), coefficient of friction between the drill pipe and casing in the fluid, stiffness of the drill pipe (Young's Modulus), hole curvature (dog leg severity), rotational speed of the drill pipe in the casing, rate of advancement downhole (sliding or rotating), the moment of inertia of the drill pipe, the wall thickness of the drill pipe, the boundary conditions describing how the bit is reacting to the formation at the bottom of the well, as well as other parameters. Several commercially available software packages predict buckling load for drill strings.
Some analytical models of buckling identify the importance of the unsupported length of the drill pipe as having a strong influence on the buckling load. Methods have been used to effectively reduce the unsupported length of drill pipe or otherwise for increasing the buckling load. Specifically, for some applications thicker wall thickness pipe is used, and in other designs stabilizer blades are placed in the drill string between drill pipe points. In other design used by Western Well Tool, a non-rotating drill pipe protector is placed in the center of the drill pipe.
The use of non-rotating drill pipe protectors to prevent buckling has been successful in increasing the buckling load, but at a cost. First, non-rotating drill pipe protectors are expensive and can be subject to damage because of the extremely high side loads at or near buckling.
Rotating protectors are typically not used to prevent buckling. Typically, rotating protectors are placed within 10 feet of the tool joints in both the 31 foot length (Range 2 drill pipe) and 45 foot length (Range 3) drill pipe. The reason is that existing rotating drill pipe protectors have poor gripping capability and cannot withstand the loads seen at or near buckling.
The present invention addresses the problems of providing a means to effectively reduce the unsupported length, resisting the resulting side loads on the drill pipe from large compressive loads, and performing these tasks economically, using the rotating drill pipe protector of this invention.
Briefly, one embodiment of the invention comprises a rotating drill pipe protector which includes a generally cylindrical sleeve-like protective wall structure adapted for mounting to a rotating drill pipe. The wall structure has at least one axial split opening along one side for use in opening and closing the protective wall structure around a drill pipe. A first elongated axial rigid hinge bar is embedded in the wall structure along a first side of the split opening. A second elongated axial rigid hinge bar is embedded in the wall structure on a second side of the split opening. Separate axially spaced apart fasteners extend laterally from the first hinge bar to the second hinge bar. The first hinge bar contains separate axially spaced apart captive sections for retaining corresponding ones of the fasteners. The second hinge bar contains separate axially spaced apart receptor sections for receiving corresponding ones of the fasteners which are rotatable in unison into alignment with the receptor sections via rotation of the first hinge bar. The aligned fasteners are adjusted in a corresponding receptor section to a tightened position that draws opposite sides of the split opening together to apply and maintain a gripping force from the wall structure around the drill pipe. The fasteners are confined within the outer circumference of the wall structure when in the tightened position applying the gripping force to the drill pipe.
After closing and rotating the fasteners into engagement with the hinge bar receptor sections, the fasteners are tightened to produce a holding force around the drill pipe that is much greater than the wedge pin method commonly found in current RDPPs. In one embodiment, the hinged rotating protector of this invention, tightened around a drill pipe at 25 ft-lbs., produces a gripping strength that resists axial slippage at applied loads greater than 10,000 ft-lbs.
In other embodiments, the rotating drill pipe protector of this invention, because of its substantial gripping strength, can be used in applications for preventing buckling of drill pipe.
These and other aspects of the invention will be more fully understood by referring to the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings.
Generally speaking, the rotatable drill pipe protector 16 comprises an elongated cylindrical sleeve made from a protective low friction material which is molded into its desired configuration around an internal reinforcing cage structure, as described below. The sleeve is fastened to the drill pipe by an attachment and fastener assembly 17 for securing the sleeve in a fixed stationary position on the drill pipe. The exterior of the sleeve preferably includes molded axial grooves circumferentially spaced apart around the sleeve, for enhancing flow past the sleeve during use.
The sleeve is made from any of a variety of low friction, non-abrasive materials that protect the drill pipe from damage under contact with the well bore or casing. Suitable materials generally include thermoplastics, thermosetting resinous materials, and/or elastomeric materials, which can include polyurethane, thermoplastic elastomers, rubber, epoxy, fluoropolymers including PTFE, acrylics, polyolefins including polyethylene and polypropylene, nylon, polyester, polyurea, ethylene vinyl acetate, ABS, or a composite comprising one or more of these materials.
The open loop hinge elements 30, on the other side of the sleeve opening 24, are similarly constructed and include a flexible U-shaped folded metal piece 30a secured by fasteners 30b along the vertical end portion of the cage.
Referring to
The fasteners 32, which are preferably formed as elongated threaded bolts, are held captive in corresponding threaded openings in the rotatable hinge bar 38. The hinge bar 38 has a series of flats milled into it to allow the bolt heads to rest flat against the hinge bar. The bolts extend laterally across the split opening 24 and into alignment with corresponding threaded receptor openings in the fixed hinge bar 40. As shown in
In use, the fasteners are initially inserted into the respective openings of the rotatable hinge bar 38 which rotates about its axis to swing the bolts clear of the opening 24, either toward or away from the second hinge bar 40 on the other side of the opening 24. Rotation of the first hinge bar 38 about its axis can therefore rotate the bolts in unison to a position in alignment with the corresponding threaded receptor openings in the second fixed hinge bar 40. The bolts 32 then can be threaded into the corresponding receptor openings in the second hinge bar, to the assembled position shown in
The hinges formed by the sheet metal pieces 28a and 30a are one embodiment. The hinges also can be made separately or in one piece as part of the cage. They are folded over so that both sides of the hinge meet at a point away from the hinge bar so the hinge can transfer the tensile loads within the fasteners into hoop loads in the structure of the protector sleeve so that it effectively grips the drill pipe. The hinge can be riveted, fastened, or welded to form the closed loop that contains the hinge bar.
The fastener system comprises a captive bolt containment system which includes oversized tapped threaded openings in the rotating hinge bar, with stepped shank portions on the bolts for preventing disengagement of the bolts when the RDPP is in the open position. Smaller diameter threaded end portions of the bolts and counter-bores in the receiving holes of the non-rotating hinge bar prevent misalignment of the bolts when engaged.
The through-diameter of the thread in the through-hole 60 in the first hinge bar is great enough to allow a free fit between the thread in the first hinge bar 38 and the stepped shank 54 of the bolt. When the bolts pass through the first hinge bar, the threads in the first hinge bar prevent the bolts from falling out when handling. The diameter of the stepped shank 54 is close to that of the minor diameter of the bolt thread. The stepped tip 58 of the bolts assists in alignment in unison with the holes in the second hinge bar. The oversized tapped thread on the first hinge bar, along with the stepped shank 54 on the bolt between the bolt head and thread, retains the bolts when in the non-installed position.
The counter-bore in the second hinge bar creates a flat surface to set the threads against, reducing the likelihood of cross-threading upon initial engagement.
The length of the threaded portion 56 of the bolt is less than the distance between the thread on the first hinge bar and the second hinge bar. This allows the fastener to disengage from the second hinge bar and still be contained by the first hinge bar.
The hinge design of the present invention includes the reinforcing cage with hinge sections folded over a larger diameter hinge bar than the thinner stamped steel wedge pin design. This results in lower stress concentrations and, therefore, greater strength. Also, the fasteners and other structural parts of the present invention are encased in and protected by the body of the protector itself, making it less likely to be damaged by protrusions, debris, or obstructions that may exist in a well.
Thus, the invention provides an attachment and fastener system for rigidly securing a rotatable drill pipe protector (RDPP) to a drill pipe adapted for rotating in a well bore or casing. The drill pipe protector comprises a sleeve-like wall structure which is split axially along at least one side. A pair of elongated parallel hinge bars are contained in first and second hinge sections which wrap around the hinge bars along opposite sides of the split opening in the RDPP. One hinge bar is rotatable in its hinge section. A series of axially spaced apart bolts are held in corresponding threaded openings in the rotatable hinge bar which rotates about its axis in its hinge to swing the bolts between open and closed positions. The other hinge bar has a series of threaded receptor openings facing outwardly from slotted openings in the hinge section which are aligned with the bolts on the other side of the opening. The rotating hinge bar swings the bolts in unison into alignment with the slotted openings in the other hinge, after which the bolts are tightened in the threaded receptor openings for applying a holding force around the drill pipe. The hinges which wrap around each hinge bar are formed on the ends of a reinforcing cage structure molded into the wall of the RDPP.
The rotating drill pipe protector of this invention generally can be manufactured as follows:
The torque used to tighten the RDPP to a 5.0-inch drill pipe can be from 15 to 40 ft-lbs. between 20-30 ft-lbs. and more preferably about 25 ft-lbs. is a desirable applied torque.
Grip strength of the RDPP was tested by various “push off” tests, by placing the sleeve on a drill pipe test unit to measure slippage on a steel 5.00 inch OD drill pipe sample. A cylinder was placed against the sleeve and increasing forces were applied until the sleeve slipped on the test pipe. These tests were conducted at various levels of torque applied to the sleeve. A comparison test was made between the RDPP of this invention and the wedge pin design commonly used commercially. Both protectors were installed per manufacturer's recommendations. A four-bolt hinged rotating protector, according to this invention, tightened to 25 ft-lbs., slipped at 10,000 to 12,000 lbs. in such grip strength testing. By comparison, the wedge pin type protector described previously, tightened to 25 ft-lbs., slipped at 2000 to 3000 lbs. Other commercial rotary drill pipe protectors began to slip at 1000 to 2000 lbs. push off loads.
A series of tests have been performed to determine wear-life characteristics of various hardness of materials, specifically various polyurethanes. In general, it was concluded that materials with a Shore Hardness of 80 have a superior wear strength in drill pipe casing compared to harder materials, for example, those having a hardness of 92 or 95. A preferred embodiment is to use a softer hardness material in the range of about 75 to 85, and more preferably, about 80 Shore Hardness, including both plastics and elastomers.
The rotating drill pipe protector of this invention can be used for buckling prevention. Each drill string comprises long lengths of unsupported drill pipe sections extending between tool joints at opposite ends of the length of pipe. As mentioned previously, the long length of the drill pipe can be subject to buckling during use. The rotating drill pipe protector of this invention can be positioned strategically between the tool joints on the otherwise unsupported length of pipe to resist bending or buckling of the drill string during use. Positioning of the drill pipe protector on the length of pipe, in essence, shortens the bending length of the pipe between the joints.
It is recognized that drill pipe protectors positioned close to the tool joints can be subject to too much abuse during use. Drill pipe protectors placed farther from the tool joints may be subject to slippage, but the rotating drill pipe protector of this invention provides substantial holding force to prevent slippage when the drill pipe protector is positioned between the tool joints to prevent buckling.
One embodiment of the invention provides a method of placement of the rotating drill pipe protector at a location (or locations) that effectively maximizes the reduction of unsupported length of drill pipe. More specifically, one or more rotating protectors are placed beyond 10 feet from the tool joint, and the preferred embodiment is approximately the middle of a typical unsupported drill pipe section. In other applications, such as with small diameter drill pipe, or when very high buckling loads are required, it may be useful to place more than one rotating protector on a section of drill pipe between tool joints. For example, two rotating protectors could be placed at locations that approximately divide the drill pipe section between tool joints into three equal parts.
In general, only specific regions of a drill string within casing would need rotating drill pipe protectors to increase the buckling load. The selection of these regions would be accomplished by the use of commercially available software programs used for drill string analysis. Thus, the cost of rotating protectors for use in buckling prevention is reduced.
This application claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/125,547, filed on Apr. 24, 2008, the entire disclosure of which, including the appendix, is fully incorporated herein by this reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2033592 | Skeen | Mar 1936 | A |
2197531 | Smith | Jan 1938 | A |
2657956 | Hall, Sr. | Nov 1953 | A |
2801700 | Hall, Sr. | Aug 1957 | A |
3180436 | Kellner et al. | Apr 1965 | A |
3397017 | Taylor, Jr. et al. | Aug 1968 | A |
3491182 | Hunder et al. | Jan 1970 | A |
3754609 | Garrett | Aug 1973 | A |
3820611 | King | Jun 1974 | A |
3948575 | Rosser | Apr 1976 | A |
3999811 | Gray | Dec 1976 | A |
4099564 | Hutchison | Jul 1978 | A |
4171560 | Garrett | Oct 1979 | A |
4199011 | Kreft et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4258804 | Richey et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4274840 | Housman | Jun 1981 | A |
4379494 | Sheshtawy | Apr 1983 | A |
4384483 | Dellinger et al. | May 1983 | A |
4436118 | Garrett | Mar 1984 | A |
4458404 | Garrett | Jul 1984 | A |
4601334 | Lovegrove | Jul 1986 | A |
4603982 | Dittrich | Aug 1986 | A |
4634314 | Pierce | Jan 1987 | A |
4674580 | Schuh et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4708203 | Walker | Nov 1987 | A |
5009826 | Walker | Apr 1991 | A |
5046558 | Koster | Sep 1991 | A |
5069297 | Krueger et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5132069 | Newton | Jul 1992 | A |
5332049 | Tew | Jul 1994 | A |
5363929 | Williams et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5364909 | Guo et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5474132 | Gallagher | Dec 1995 | A |
5604266 | Mushovic | Feb 1997 | A |
5692563 | Krueger et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5803193 | Krueger et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5833018 | von Gynz-Rekowski | Nov 1998 | A |
5833019 | Gynz-Rekowski | Nov 1998 | A |
5866218 | Meuth | Feb 1999 | A |
5901798 | Herrera et al. | May 1999 | A |
5902656 | Hwang | May 1999 | A |
5937948 | Robbins, III | Aug 1999 | A |
6032748 | DeBray et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6250405 | Moore et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250406 | Luke | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6378633 | Moore et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6467557 | Krueger et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470974 | Moore et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6513223 | Angman et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6708783 | Moore et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6725939 | Richard | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6739415 | Mitchell et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6942044 | Moore et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7055631 | Mitchell et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7195730 | Calderoni et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
20050224123 | Baynham et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060062638 | Bergeron et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060196036 | Male et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060207768 | Angman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070131414 | Calderoni et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 87 938 | Aug 1997 | EP |
117185 | Jul 1918 | GB |
2 282 615 | Apr 1995 | GB |
2 400 124 | Oct 2004 | GB |
2 423 739 | Sep 2006 | GB |
WO 0202904 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0248501 | Jun 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090266618 A1 | Oct 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61125547 | Apr 2008 | US |