This application relates to a rotating nozzle for use in a cleaning system such as may be utilized to clean the interior of tubes, and wherein a pressure drop differential between an inlet side and an outlet side of a rotating shaft is utilized to provide a fluid thrust to properly support the shaft.
Systems utilized to clean the interior of tubes, or other small hollow parts, with the use of a high pressure water jets are known. Typically, a rotating fluid nozzle is inserted into the interior of a tube, and moved along that interior. A source of high pressure water is connected to the nozzle and jets outwardly of nozzle openings at a forward end of the nozzle. The jetting fluid impacts against an interior surface, cleaning the tube.
One challenge with such high pressure jet nozzles is the countering of the forces on the shaft from the water.
A fluid nozzle for use in a high pressure water jetting system includes a housing to be fixed to a source of high pressure water. The housing receives a rotating member and an inner peripheral bore. The rotating member includes a shaft received within the housing, and a nozzle extending outwardly of the housing. The nozzle has openings extending along a direction having a component both forwardly along an axis of rotation of the shaft and the nozzle, and radially outwardly relative to the central axis. A central passage within the shaft communicates high pressure fluid to the nozzle. The shaft includes leakage paths to provide leakage fluid from the central passage to an interface between an outer peripheral wall of the shaft and an inner peripheral wall of the bore in the housing. The leakage paths communicate fluid to a forward fluid pressure chamber, and to a rearward fluid pressure chamber. A pressure loss to the rearward fluid pressure chamber is greater than a pressure drop at the forward pressure chamber.
These and other features of the present invention can be best understood from the following specification and drawings, the following of which is a brief description.
However, other ways of providing pressurized water to the nozzle would come within the scope of this invention.
A first housing 24 includes threads to be secured to a component for delivering the water. A second fixed housing 28 is connected through a thread connection 26 to the first housing 24. The second housing 28 extends forwardly to a ledge 29. The ledge 29 extends radially inwardly relative to a central axis of the system 20 and provides a pressure fluid chamber 48 at an end of a rotating shaft 31.
The rotating shaft 31 has an inlet end 91, which has a relatively small outer diameter, and is received within a bushing. Bushing 52 minimizes leakage between the outer periphery of the portion 91 and the inner periphery of the first housing 24. A fluid pressure chamber 58 is defined forwardly of the bushing 52, and a thrust bearing surface 56 is defined between a ledge 93 on the first housing 24 and a rear face 95 of the rotating shaft 31.
This thrust area 95 communicates with an enlarged chamber 50 defined by a conical portion 99 of the shaft and an inner periphery of the second housing member 28. The enlarged chamber 50 communicates with openings 30, which direct fluid to atmosphere.
A central passage 40 communicates pressurized fluid to a nozzle chamber 42 in a nozzle 34. As can be seen, communication passages 44 extend from central passage 40 radially outwardly to an outer peripheral surface of the shaft 31. Fluid delivered through the passages 44 passes along relatively small leakage paths both toward the inlet end and the outlet end of the rotating shaft. The paths are formed between the inner periphery 46 of the housing 28 and the outer periphery of the shaft 31. Leakage forwardly, or toward the right in this FIGURE, reaches the chamber 48. The chamber 48 is defined in part by a conical forward surface 101 of the shaft 31. Leakage rearwardly, or the left in this FIGURE, reaches the chamber 50. From chamber 50, this fluid will leak outwardly of the opening 30 to atmosphere. On the other hand, fluid will leak through the bushing 52, into chamber 58, and to the thrust surfaces 95/56. The pressure drop for the fluid moving to the left, compared to the pressure drop to the fluid moving to the right, is much higher. Thus, the pressure of the fluid on the thrust area 95 is lower than the pressure in the chamber 48. Due to this, there is an overall force forcing the shaft 31 to the left, and will counteract reaction forces from the fluid jets, and forces at the inlet end. On the other hand, the provision of the pressurized fluid to the surface 56 does ensure that the rotating shaft 31 will be lifted off of the surface 93 of the first housing member 24.
Fluid reaching the chamber 42 then communicates through nozzle holes or ports 36, 37 and 39. As can be appreciated, each of these holes have a component extending forwardly, or further into a tube 32. On the other hand, these nozzles are not directly along that axis, but each have a component extending radially outwardly. The shaft is driven to rotate by the offset ports
Fluid that leaks between the nozzle 34 and the outer periphery of the shaft 31 will reach a hole 136.
As can be appreciated from
As can be appreciated from the FIGURE, a distance d1 from the central passages 44 to the beginning of the rearward conical portion 99 is greater than a distance d2 from the central passages to the beginning of the forward conical portion 101. The forward conical portion extends over a distance d4 while the rearward conical portion extends over a distance d3, which is greater than d4. The outer diameter at the end of the forward conical portion is d5, and is greater than an outer diameter at the end of the rearward conical portion d6. The angle of the rearward conical portion B is greater than the angle A of the forward conical portion. In one embodiment, d1 was 0.438″, d2 was 0.255″, d5 was 0.127″, d4 was 0.080″, d5 was 0.280″, d6 was 0.250″, and a nominal outer diameter d7 was 0.3183″. The angle A was approximately 13.5°, and the angle B was approximately 15°.
An inlet area can be defined as the end of the inlet end 91, including the bore 40. The bore 40 will also act as a reaction surface, since at its end, the fluid will react against the nozzle 34. A shoulder area can be defined as the surface area of the forward conical portion 101, or the area formed between shaft outer diameter d7 and the shoulder diameter d5. In the above-mentioned embodiment, the inlet area would be 0.0113/0.0112 in2, while the shoulder area is 0.0203/0.0180 in2. The ratio of the shoulder area to the inlet area is preferably between 1.8 and 1.6. The inlet area is inversely proportional to the forward leak length d2. 1/leak length=350*inlet area in one embodiment. The value of 350 is of course exemplary, and the ratio of 1/leak length can range between 345 and 355 of the inlet area.
The clearance between the housing body and the shaft is important in defining the pressure drop toward the output end of the shaft. A larger clearance area results in less pressure drop toward the outlet end, and would require a smaller shoulder area. The outer diameter d7 is thus preferably between 0.317″ and 0.320″. The ratios for the forward link length d2, the inlet area, and the shoulder area are dependent on having a clearance of between 0.001″ and 0.003″.
Although an embodiment of this invention has been disclosed, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1977763 | Gordon | Oct 1934 | A |
3433489 | Wiese | Mar 1969 | A |
3802515 | Flamand et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3810637 | Bonvin | May 1974 | A |
4114703 | Matson, Jr. et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4196911 | Matsushita | Apr 1980 | A |
4225000 | Maurer | Sep 1980 | A |
4246976 | McDonald, Jr. | Jan 1981 | A |
4324299 | Nagel | Apr 1982 | A |
4437525 | O'Hanlon et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4440242 | Schmidt et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4493381 | Kajikawa et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4521167 | Cavalleri et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4529046 | Schmidt et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
D285824 | Anderson | Sep 1986 | S |
4665997 | Maurer et al. | May 1987 | A |
4715538 | Lingnau | Dec 1987 | A |
4747544 | Kranzle | May 1988 | A |
4821961 | Shook | Apr 1989 | A |
4905775 | Warren et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4923120 | Hammelmann | May 1990 | A |
4934254 | Clark et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5024382 | Shook et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5028004 | Hammelmann | Jul 1991 | A |
5096122 | Abramoska | Mar 1992 | A |
D327943 | Tsai | Jul 1992 | S |
5135015 | Young | Aug 1992 | A |
5195585 | Clemens et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5217163 | Henshaw | Jun 1993 | A |
5456413 | Ellis | Oct 1995 | A |
5531383 | Pacht | Jul 1996 | A |
5603385 | Colebrook | Feb 1997 | A |
5685487 | Ellis | Nov 1997 | A |
5857623 | Miller et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5909848 | Zink | Jun 1999 | A |
5909879 | Simpson | Jun 1999 | A |
5938206 | Klosterman et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5964414 | Hardy et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6027040 | Frye-Hammelmann | Feb 2000 | A |
6059202 | Zink et al. | May 2000 | A |
6062311 | Johnson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6085994 | Zink | Jul 2000 | A |
6263969 | Stoesz et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6347675 | Kollé | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6453996 | Carmichael et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6557856 | Azibert et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6698669 | Rieben | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7198456 | Kollé et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7201238 | Marvin et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7546959 | Wagner et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7594614 | Vijay et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
20050109541 | Marvin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20070257132 | Wright et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2152606 | Dec 1994 | CN |
2587520 | Nov 2003 | CN |
1568680 | Mar 1970 | DE |
6171684 | Jun 1994 | JP |
07155719 | Jun 1995 | JP |
10211450 | Aug 1998 | JP |
2000130294 | May 2000 | JP |
587240 | Jan 1978 | SU |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110036376 A1 | Feb 2011 | US |