Patent Grant
12194562
This is the U.S. National Phase application of PCT/JP2019/011734, filed Mar. 20, 2019, which claims priority to Japanese Patent Application No. 2018-052622, filed Mar. 20, 2018 and Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-005166, filed Jan. 16, 2019, the disclosures of these applications being incorporated herein by reference in their entireties for all purposes.
The present invention relates to a rotating tool for double-sided friction stir welding that is applied to double-sided friction stir welding, which is a technique for welding two metal plates by rotating a pair of rotating tools, which oppose each other, in opposite directions, a double-sided friction stir welding apparatus that uses the rotating tools for double-sided friction stir welding, and a double-sided friction stir welding method.
Patent Literature 1 discloses a technique for welding a pair of members such as metal plates by rotating both or one of the metal plates so as to generate heat that softens the metal plates and stirring softened portions so as to cause plastic flow.
However, in the technique described in Patent Literature 1, it is necessary to rotate a member that is a welding target such as a metal plate, and thus, there are limitations on the shape and the dimensions of a member to be welded such as a metal plate.
In contrast, as a friction welding technique different from Patent Literature 1, for example, Patent Literature 2 discloses a method for continuously welding metal plates in the longitudinal direction by using heat generated between a rotating tool and the metal plates and plastic flow by inserting the rotating tool (hereinafter sometimes simply referred to as “tool”) that has a probe (hereinafter sometimes simply referred to as “pin”) made of a material substantially harder than a workpiece, such as a metal plate, into an unwelded portion of the metal plates and causing the tool to move while rotating. Note that, in the present specification, a portion in which metal plates are butted together or arranged so as to overlap each other, the portion having not yet been welded, will hereinafter be referred to as “an unwelded portion”, and a portion that has been welded and integrated will hereinafter be referred to as “a welded portion”.
As described above, the friction welding method described in Patent Literature 1 is a method in which metal plates are rotated so as to generate frictional heat therebetween, and the metal plates are welded together by the frictional heat. In contrast, the friction stir welding described in Patent Literature 2 is a method in which metal plates are fixed in place and welded together by a rotating tool that moves while rotating. Thus, the friction stir welding method has an advantage in that, even if a member has a substantially infinite length in a welding direction, solid-state welding can be continuously performed on the member in the longitudinal direction of the member. In addition, since the friction stir welding method is solid-state welding that uses plastic flow of a metal caused by frictional heat generated between a rotating tool and metal plates, welding can be performed without melting an unwelded portion. Furthermore, the friction stir welding method has many advantages of, for example, less deformation after welding because of low heating temperature, fewer defects in a welded portion as a result of not melting metal plates, and no necessity for a filler material.
A friction stir welding method has a wide range of applications in the fields such as aircrafts, ships, railway vehicles, and automobiles as a method of welding low-melting-point metal materials, representative examples of which are an aluminum alloy and a magnesium alloy. This is because, in the case of such low-melting-point metal materials, when an arc welding method of the related art is used, it is difficult to obtain welded portions with satisfactory properties, but the use of the friction stir welding method can improve productivity and obtain a welded portion (a joint) having a high quality.
By using the friction stir welding method for structural steel mainly used as a material of structures such as buildings, ships, heavy equipment, pipelines and automobiles, solidification cracking and hydrogen cracking, which have been problems in fusion welding of the related art can be avoided, and changes in the structures of steel materials are suppressed, so that improvement in joint performance can be expected. In addition, stirring a welding interface with a rotating tool can create clean surfaces, and these clean surfaces can be brought into contact with each other, so that another advantage in that no pre-treatment step is necessary unlike in diffusion bonding can also be expected. As described above, the use of the friction stir welding method for structural steel has many anticipated advantages. However, the use of the friction stir welding method for structural steel still has problems concerning the welding workability, such as suppression of occurrence of a defect in a joint during welding and an increase in welding speed, and thus, the use of the friction stir welding method for structural steel has been less popular than the use of the friction stir welding method for low-melting-point metal materials. Examples of the above-mentioned defect in a joint include a shape failure and a weld failure on a joint surface or in a joint especially immediately after welding.
Principal factors in the occurrence of defects in the above friction stir welding method described in Patent Literature 2 include variations in temperature and plastic flow that occur in the thickness direction of metal plates. More specifically, in the case where a rotating tool is disposed only on first surfaces of metal plates, plastic flow that is sufficient to achieve a metallurgically favorable welded state can be obtained on the first surface side, whereas the plastic flow obtained on the second surface side is often insufficient because a temperature rise in the unwelded portion and a shearing stress applied as a load thereto during welding are insufficient.
In the case where the friction stir welding method described in Patent Literature 2 is used for structural steel, since the strength of the structural steel, which is a workpiece, is high at a high temperature, when the heat input is low, and the welding speed is high, sufficient plastic flow cannot be obtained in the unwelded portion in many cases. Thus, it is difficult to increase the welding speed while suppressing the occurrence of defects during welding.
As means for solving such problems, for example, Patent Literatures 3, 4, and 5 each disclose a double-sided friction stir welding method. In the double-sided friction stir welding method, a pair of rotating tools opposing each other are pressed against the two surfaces, the first surface and the second surface, of a welding portion of metal plates (workpieces), so that plastic flow that is uniform and sufficient in the thickness direction of the workpieces can be obtained. As a result, an increase in the welding speed can be achieved while occurrence of defects in a joint during welding is suppressed.
In addition, in order to make the use of the friction stir welding method for structural steel more popular, it is necessary to improve the durability and the service life of a tool. This is because, if, repair is required due to breakage and wear of a tool, so that it is anticipated that a weld failure will occur with a high probability, it is determined to be difficult to practically apply the friction stir welding method to structural steel even with the advantageous features (effects) such as those described above.
A common friction stir welding method uses a rotating tool that includes a protruding probe, which is formed at an end thereof and at the center of the rotation axis thereof, and a shoulder portion having a flatter shape around the probe, and the rotating tool is caused to perform a translational movement while rotating in a state where the probe is inserted in an unwelded portion, so that workpieces may be welded together. Consequently, a large load is applied to the probe during welding, and thus, the probe is especially likely to break or become worn among the parts constituting the rotating tool.
As examples of a technique for avoiding breakage or the like of a probe, Patent Literatures 6 to 11 each disclose friction stir welding using a rotating tool that has an end portion having a planar shape and that does not have a probe.
However, an object of each of the techniques disclosed in Patent Literatures 6 and 7 is to reinforce a welded portion or to harden a metal surface, and these techniques do not consider any application to welding of metal plates. Although the end portion of the rotating tool disclosed in each of these techniques has a flat surface or a planar surface, there is no description in Patent Literatures 6 and 7 about forming the end portion into a concave curved shape or a convex curved shape for the purpose of improving plastic flow. In addition, there is no description that the rotating tool of the related art described in Patent Literatures 6 and 7 mentioned above includes a vortex-shaped stepped portion formed to extend in a direction opposite to the rotation direction. Thus, in the case where the above-mentioned rotating tool of the related art is used for welding metal plates, there is a possibility that sufficient plastic flow will not be obtained in a plate-thickness direction, which in turn leads to a weld failure.
In addition, an object of each of the techniques disclosed in Patent Literatures 8 to 11 is to weld metal plates by a friction stir method, and these techniques do not consider any application to a double-sided friction stir welding method. In other words, in Patent Literatures 8 to 11, there is no disclosure of an appropriate relationship between the diameter of an end portion of a tool and the thickness of metal plates which are to be welded together in the double-sided friction stir welding method, and thus, there is a possibility that a indefective joint will not be obtained.
Aspects of the present invention have been completed in view of the above problems, and it is an object according to aspects of the present invention to provide rotating tools for double-sided friction stir welding that are applied to double-sided friction stir welding, which is a technique for welding two metal plates by rotating a pair of rotating tools, which oppose each other, in opposite directions, a double-sided friction stir welding apparatus that uses the rotating tools for double-sided friction stir welding, and a double-sided friction stir welding method.
Aspects of the present invention are as follows.
According to aspects of the present invention, rotating tools for double-sided friction stir welding each of which does not have a probe at an end thereof can be provided, and the rotating tools are suitably used in a double-sided friction stir welding apparatus that welds two metal plates by rotating a pair of rotating tools, which oppose each other, in opposite directions and in a double-sided friction stir welding method. The rotating tools for double-sided friction stir welding according to aspects of the present invention facilitates plastic flow uniformly in the thickness direction of metal plates, and thus, a joint that has a sufficient strength and in which occurrence of a defect is suppressed can be obtained at a high welding speed. In addition, a probe that preferentially becomes broken and worn as a result of receiving a stress greater than the stress received by a shoulder portion in a rotating tool of the related art can be eliminated, and thus, the durability of each of the rotating tools for double-sided friction stir welding can be improved.
A rotating tool for double-sided friction stir welding according to aspects of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. Note that the present invention is not limited to the following embodiments.
First, a double-sided friction stir welding method to which the rotating tools for double-sided friction stir welding according to aspects of the present invention (hereinafter referred to as “rotating tools”) are applicable will be described.
As illustrated in
The rotating tools 1 and 8 of the double-sided friction stir welding apparatus (the rotating tool that is disposed on the front surface side of metal plates will hereinafter sometimes be referred to as a front-surface-side rotating tool 1, and the rotating tool that is disposed on the rear surface side of the metal plates will hereinafter sometimes be referred to as a rear-surface-side rotating tool 8) are arranged such that one of them is located on the side on which first surfaces (front surfaces) of metal plates (workpieces, or to-be-welded members) 4 are present and the other is located on the side on which second surfaces (rear surfaces) of the metal plates 4 are present. The two metal plates 4 are arranged so as to be parallel to a joint center line 7 that is illustrated in
As illustrated in
Note that, if the rotating tool 1 on the front surface side and the rotating tool 8 on the rear surface side, which opposes each other, rotate in the same direction, the speed of one of the rotating tools relative to the other of the rotating tools approaches zero. As a result, plastic deformation of the metal plates 4 becomes smaller as the plastic flow of the metal plates 4 becomes close to a uniform state, and heat generated by plastic deformation of the material cannot be obtained, so that it is difficult to achieve a favorable welded state. Thus, in order to uniformly obtain a temperature rise and a shearing stress that are sufficient to achieve a favorable welded state in a thickness direction of the metal plates, it is effective to set the directions of rotations of the rotating tool 1 on the front surface side (the first surface side) and the rotating tool 8 on the rear surface side (the second surface side), which oppose each other, to be opposite to each other.
Here, types of welding of metal plates will now be described.
Preferred examples of types of welding of metal plates include butt welding and lap welding. In butt welding, as illustrated in
The rotating tools for double-sided friction stir welding according to aspects of the present invention will now be described.
The rotating tool 20 including a probe (a pin) 21, which is an example of the related art, will now be described with reference to
As illustrated in
The probe 21 has a function of improving a stirring performance in the vicinity of center portions of the metal plates in a plate-thickness direction by entering softened portions of the metal plates further toward the center in the plate-thickness direction during welding. On the other hand, there is a problem in that the probe 21 that is positioned further forward in the plate-thickness direction (toward the center of the plate-thickness) receives a stress greater than the stress received by the shoulder portion 22. Consequently, there is another problem in that repair is required due to the above-mentioned breakage and wear of a rotating tool.
As a result of extensive studies, the inventors of the present invention have developed rotating tools for double-sided friction stir welding that are capable of suppressing occurrence of a defect in a welded portion and increasing a welding speed without having a probe that is especially likely to break or become worn by nature due to a greater stress applied thereto.
As illustrated in
Here, the end portions 11 of the rotating tools 1 and 8 (an end portion 2 of the front-surface-side rotating tool and an end portion 9 of the rear-surface-side rotating tool, which are illustrated in
Note that test methods for Vickers hardness at elevated temperatures may be used for hardness comparison. The rotating tools 1 and 8 may be formed such that only their end portions have the above-mentioned hardness or such that the entire rotating tools 1 and 8 have the above-mentioned hardness.
In accordance with aspects of the present invention, in addition to the above-described configuration, it is preferable that the end portion 11 of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8 has vortex-shaped (spiral-shaped) stepped portion 12. It is preferable that vortices (spirals) forming the stepped portions 12 of the rotating tool 1 be provided so as to extend in a direction opposite to the direction of rotation of the rotating tool 1, and it is preferable that vortices (spirals) forming the stepped portions 12 of the rotating tool 8 be provided so as to extend in a direction opposite to the direction of rotation of the rotating tool 8. It is preferable to provide one or more vortices forming the stepped portions 12. Note that if the number of vortices forming the stepped portions 12 is greater than six, an effect of improving material flow decreases, and in addition, there is a possibility that the end portions 11 of the rotating tools 1 and 8 may easily break as a result of their shapes becoming complex. Therefore, it is preferable that the number of vortices forming the stepped portions 12 be six or smaller. Note that, in the cases illustrated in
From the standpoint of preventing breakage of the end portions 11 of the rotating tools 1 and 8 while improving material flow, the number of vortices forming the stepped portions 12 can be adjusted in accordance with the diameter of each of the end portions 11. More specifically, it is preferable to increase the number of vortices as the diameter of each of the end portions 11 becomes larger, and it is preferable to decrease the number of vortices as the diameter of each of the end portions 11 becomes smaller.
Each of the stepped portions 12 has a shape that is recessed on the other surface (planar surface or curved surface) of a corresponding one of the end portions. By providing such recessed stepped portions 12, when the rotating tools 1 and 8 press and stir the metal plates 4, a metal material softened by frictional heat is caused to flow from the outside of the rotating tools 1 and 8 toward the inside, and the metal material can be suppressed from flowing out of the portion pressed by the rotating tools 1 and 8. This can facilitate plastic flow of the pressed portion. In addition, a decrease in the thickness of a welded portion in comparison with a base member can be suppressed, and a beautiful surface of the welded portion can be formed with no burr. Note that the above advantageous effects, which are obtained as a result of providing the stepped portions, are obtained by forming the vortex-shaped stepped portions 12 such that the stepped portions 12 extend in the direction opposite to the direction of rotation of the rotating tools 1 and 8. In other words, it is preferable that the end portions of the rotating tools according to aspects of the present invention do not have a vortex-shaped stepped portion, or it is preferable that the end portions of the rotating tools according to aspects of the present invention each have vortex-shaped stepped portions that are formed to extend in a direction opposite to the rotation direction of the corresponding rotating tool.
Note that, advantageous effects similar to those described above can be obtained by providing the vortex-shaped stepped portions 12, each of which is formed to extend in the direction opposite to the rotation direction of the corresponding rotating tool, in one or more tiers.
The stepped portions 12 will now be described more specifically with reference to
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
Specific examples of the stepped portions 12 may be step portions 12b that are illustrated in
Note that, although not illustrated, in the case of a rotating tool that includes an end portion having a concave curved shape, when the step portions 12b are each formed in the concave curved shape, steps may be formed along the concave curved shape such that the heights of the steps gradually decrease from the circumference of a circle toward the center of the circle.
In the case illustrated in
Note that, although not illustrated, in the rotating tool 1 that includes the end portion 11 having the concave curved shape 11c or the planar shape 11a, also when the groove portions 12c are formed in the concave curved surface or the planar surface, grooves each of which is substantially U-shaped when viewed in cross section may be formed.
In accordance with aspects of the present invention, in addition to the above-described configuration, it is preferable that a diameter D (mm) of the end portion 11 of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8 satisfy the following relational formula (3):
4×t≤D≤20×t formula (3)
where t stands for thickness of each metal plate (mm).
By controlling the diameter of each of the end portions 11, the rotating tools 1 and 8 can provide a temperature rise and a shearing stress uniformly and effectively in the plate-thickness direction of the metal plate 4. It is preferable that the diameter D of the end portion 11 of the rotating tool 1 be controlled in accordance with the thickness of each of the metal plates 4 (the total thickness of the metal plates 4 in the case of lap welding). In other words, it is effective to set the diameter D (mm) of the end portion 11 of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8 in accordance with the above formula (3): 4×t≤D≤20×t.
If the diameter D (mm) is less than 4×t (mm), uniform plastic flow in the plate-thickness direction may sometimes not be effectively obtained. In contrast, in the case where the diameter D (mm) is greater than 20×t (mm), a region in which plastic flow is generated is unnecessarily widened, and an excessive load is applied to the apparatus. Therefore, this case is not preferable.
The rotating tools according to the first to third embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail below. Note that only the front-surface-side rotating tool 1 is illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
In addition, in the case where the end of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8 is formed of the end portion 11 having the convex curved shape 11b, when the convex curved surface (convex surface) has a height dv (mm), and the end portion of the rotating tool has the diameter D (mm), it is preferable that the rotating tool satisfy the following relational formula (4).
dv/D≤0.06 formula (4)
When the end portions come into contact with the metal plates within a range in which the above formula (4) is satisfied (i.e., the value of dv/D is 0.06 or smaller), pressure can be effectively applied to the flowing portions. As a result, plastic flow that is sufficient for welding can be generated by rotations of the rotating tools. In contrast, in the case of exceeding the range of the above formula (4) (i.e., the value of dv/D exceeds 0.06), the front and rear surfaces of the welded portion become notably recessed, and the thickness of the welded portion becomes notably small with respect to the thickness of each of the metal plates, so that it may sometimes be difficult to ensure the joint strength. Therefore, this case is not desirable. Note that, in order to effectively apply pressure to the flowing portions, it is preferable to set a lower limit of the value of dv/D to 0.01 or larger.
As illustrated in
In addition, in the case where the end of each of the rotating tools is formed of the end portion 11 having the concave curved shape, when the concave curved surface (concave surface) has a depth dc (mm), and the end portion of the rotating tool has the diameter D (mm), it is preferable that the rotating tool satisfy the following relational formula (5).
dc/D≤0.03 formula (5)
When the end portions come into contact with the metal plates within a range in which the above formula (5) is satisfied (i.e., the value of dc/D is 0.03 or smaller), the concave curved surfaces of the end portions are filled with the softened metal, so that pressure can be uniformly applied to the flowing portions. As a result, plastic flow that is sufficient for welding can be generated by rotation of the rotating tools. In contrast, in the case of exceeding the range of the above formula (5) (i.e., the value of dc/D exceeds 0.03), it becomes difficult to apply a uniform pressure to the above-mentioned flowing portions, and it may sometimes become difficult to ensure plastic flow sufficient for welding. Therefore, this case is not desirable. Note that, in order to apply a uniform pressure to the flowing portions, it is preferable to set a lower limit of the value of dc/D to 0.01 or larger.
Note that the shapes of base portions of the rotating tools 1 and 8, the base portions being opposite to the end portions of the rotating tools 1 and 8, are not particularly limited as long as the base portions can be attached to a double-sided friction stir welding apparatus that is known in the related art.
A preferred example of a double-sided friction stir welding method using the rotating tools 1 and 8 for double-sided friction stir welding according to aspects of the present invention will now be described.
In the double-sided friction stir welding method, by optimizing conditions of the following various parameters, more favorable advantageous effects related to improvement in the durability of the rotating tools, suppression of occurrence of a joint defect, and an increase in welding speed can be obtained.
(1) inclination angle of rotating tool α(°): 0≤α≤3 formula (1)
As illustrated in
The rotating tools 1 and 8 need to be made of a material that is harder than the metal plates 4, and for example, there is a case where a material having poor toughness such as a ceramic is used. In this case, when a force in the bending direction is applied to the rotating tools 1 and 8, there is a possibility that a stress will be locally concentrated, which in turn results in breakage of the rotating tools 1 and 8. In order to avoid such a situation, by arranging the rotating tools 1 and 8 in such a manner that their rotation axes 3 and 10 are each inclined at the predetermined angle (α°) as described above, components of the load applied to the rotating tools 1 and 8 can be received as forces that compress the rotating tools 1 and 8 in the corresponding axial directions, and the forces in the bending direction can be reduced. As a result, the durability of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8 can be further improved.
The above-mentioned advantageous effects are obtained when the inclination angle α is 0 degrees or greater, and when the inclination angle α exceeds 3°, the front and rear surfaces of the welded portion may become recessed, and this may sometimes adversely affect the joint strength. Thus, it is preferable to set the inclination angle of the rotation axis of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8 to be 0≤α≤3.
(2) distance G(mm) between end portions of pair of rotating tools 1 and 8:0.25×t−0.2×D×sin α≤G≤0.8×t−0.2×D×sin α formula (2)
where t stands for thickness (mm) of unwelded portion of metal plates 4, D stands for diameter (mm) of end portions of rotating tools 1 and 8, and α stands for inclination angle (°) of rotating tools 1 and 8.
In double-sided friction stir welding, when achieving uniform provision of a sufficient temperature rise and a sufficient shearing stress in the plate-thickness direction during welding, it is important to manage the distance G between the end portions of the rotating tools 1 and 8 opposing each other. More specifically, it is preferable to manage (adjust) the above-mentioned distance G between the end portions of the rotating tools 1 and 8 to be within the range of the above formula (2) by using the thickness t of the unwelded portion of the metal plates 4, the diameter D of the end portion of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8, and the inclination angle α of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8.
Note that, in the case where butt welding, which is illustrated in
In the case where the rotating tools 1 and 8 are not inclined (i.e., the inclination angle α of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8 is 0 degrees), the lower limit and the upper limit of the distance G between the end portions 2 and 9 of the rotating tools 1 and 8 may be respectively set to 0.25×t and 0.8×t.
In contrast, in the case where the rotating tools 1 and 8 are inclined (i.e., the inclination angle α of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8 is 0≤α≤3), or in the case where the diameter D of the end portion of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8 is increased in order to increase the contact area between the end portion of the rotating tool 1 and the front surfaces of the metal plates 4 and the contact area between the end portion of the rotating tool 8 and the rear surfaces of the metal plates 4, the distance G between the rotating tools 1 and 8 needs to be set smaller. In this case, as expressed by the above formula (2), the lower limit of G may be obtained by subtracting 0.2×D×sin α from 0.25×t, and the upper limit of G may be obtained by subtracting 0.2×D×sin α from 0.8×t.
As described above, by controlling the distance G between the end portions of the rotating tools 1 and 8 to be within the range of the above formula (2), the end portions of the rotating tools 1 and 8 opposing each other are pressed against the front and rear surfaces of the metal plates 4 with a sufficient load, and heat generation and plastic flow in the welded portion are sufficiently facilitated. As a result, plastic flow is facilitated uniformly in the plate-thickness direction, and a joint in a favorable state can be obtained. Note that, when the above-mentioned value of the distance G exceeds the upper limit in formula (2), the end portions of the rotating tools 1 and 8 cannot be pressed against the front and rear surfaces of the metal plates 4 (workpieces) with a sufficient load, and the above-mentioned advantageous effects may sometimes not be obtained. In contrast, when the above-mentioned value of the distance G falls below the lower limit in formula (2), the front and rear surfaces of the welded portion may become recessed, and this may sometimes adversely affect the joint strength.
As illustrated in
Note that welding conditions other than those described above may be set in a conventional manner. For example, in the double-sided friction stir welding apparatus and the double-sided friction stir welding method according to aspects of the present invention, the rotational speed of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8 is preferably set to 100 to 5,000 r/min and more preferably set to 500 to 3,000 r/min. By setting the rotational speed to be within these ranges, deterioration in mechanical properties due to an excessive amount of heat input can be suppressed while a favorable surface profile is maintained. The welding speed is preferably set to 1,000 ram/min or higher and is more preferably increased to 2,000 mm/min or higher.
Regarding the to-be-welded members, although it is preferable that a welding target be a high-melting-point alloy such as a steel plate, the to-be-welded members are not limited to this case. In addition, a steel plate, which is a type of a metal plate, can be a preferred example of the to-be-welded members.
In the case where the to-be-welded members are steel plates, the types of steels that can preferably be used include common structural steel and carbon steel, examples of which are rolled steels for welded structure of Japanese industrial standards (JIS) G 3106 and carbon steels for machine structural use of JIS G 4051. In addition, it can be favorably applied to high-strength structural steel that has a tensile strength of 800 MPa or greater. Even in this case, in the welded portion, a strength that is 85% or more, preferably 90% or more, and more preferably 95% or more of the tensile strength of a steel plate (a base member) can be obtained.
Double-sided friction stir welding is performed by using a double-sided friction stir welding apparatus that includes the pair of rotating tools 1 and 8 according to aspects of the present invention, such as those illustrated in
As described above, according to the rotating tools 1 and 8 according to aspects of the present invention, the durability of each of the rotating tools 1 and 8 can be improved. In addition, by forming the end portions of the rotating tools into the above-mentioned shapes and causing the rotating tools 1 and 8 opposing each other to rotate in the opposite directions, a sufficient temperature rise and a sufficient shearing stress can be given to the metal plates during welding. As a result, the effect that the occurrence of a defect in a welded portion can be suppressed, and the welding speed can be increased. Therefore, by performing the double-sided friction stir welding method using the double-sided friction stir welding apparatus that includes the rotating tools according to aspects of the present invention, the double-sided friction stir welding can be practically applied to welding of structural steel.
Operations and effects according to aspects of the present invention will be described below by using an example. Note that the present invention is not limited to the following example.
Double-sided friction stir welding was performed by using steel plates whose plate thickness, chemical composition, tensile strength, and Vickers hardness are shown in Table 1. In the example, lap welding was performed on some of the steel plates, and butt welding was performed on the rest of the steel plates.
In the case of butt welding, two steel plates of the same type were arranged side by side, and butt-joint surfaces forming a so-called square groove, which is not angled, and having a surface condition equivalent to that of a surface machined by a milling machine were formed. After that, welding was performed by pressing the rotating tools against both the first and second surfaces (the front surface and the rear surface) of a butt-joint portion and moving the rotating tools in the welding direction.
In the case of lap welding, two steel plates of the same type were arranged so as to overlap each other, and welding was performed by pressing the rotating tools against both the first and second surfaces (the front surface and the rear surface) of a steel-plate overlapping portion while a single welding length was set to 0.5 m.
Note that, both in the case of butt welding and in the case of lap welding, the pair of rotating tools were caused to rotate in the opposite directions during welding. In other words, the tools rotate in the same direction when the end portion of each of the tools is viewed from the front. Table 2-1 and Table 2-2 show welding conditions for friction stir welding. In addition, here, eight types of rotating tools having the cross-sectional dimensions and the shapes illustrated in
Evaluations were conducted in the following manner by using obtained welding joints.
(I) Existence or Nonexistence of Surface Defect when Appearance of Joint is Observed
Observation was performed on portions of the obtained welding joints in each of which the welding speed was one of the values shown Table 2-1 and Table 2-2. Regarding the existence or nonexistence of a surface defect, it is visually determined whether there is a groove-shaped portion that is in an unwelded state due to insufficient plastic flow or whether a welded portion is formed in a recessed manner because the gap G between the shoulder portions of the welding tools is too narrow. When a groove-shaped portion in the unwelded state or a welded portion formed in a recessed manner was seen as a surface defect, a depth Dd (mm) of the portion was measured by using a laser displacement meter and evaluated by using the following criteria.
<Criteria>
No: None of the above-mentioned surface defects are seen.
Acceptable: Although one of the above-mentioned surface defects is seen, the ratio (Dd/t) between the above-mentioned depth Dd (mm) and the thickness t (mm) of each steel plate was 0.1 or smaller.
Yes: One of the above-mentioned surface defects was seen, and the ratio (Dd/t) between the above-mentioned depth Dd (mm) and the thickness t (mm) of each steel plate exceeded 0.1. Alternatively, a groove-shaped portion in the unwelded state extended from the front surface to the rear surface. Note that, in the case where the groove-shaped portion in the unwelded state extended from the front surface to the rear surface, it is considered that the welding has failed, and evaluations of internal defect and joint strength are not conducted.
(II) Existence or Nonexistence of Internal Defect when Cross Section of Joint is Observed
Observation was performed on portions of the obtained welding joints in each of which the welding speed was one of the values shown Table 2-1 and Table 2-2, and the portions were cross-sectionally cut at a position 20 mm from a welding starting end, a position 20 mm from a welding terminating end, and an intermediate position between these ends so as to be used as test specimens. Regarding the existence or nonexistence of an internal defect, whether an unwelded state formed in the welded portion due to insufficient plastic flow is seen was evaluated by using an optical microscope (magnification: 10 times) on the basis of the following criteria.
<Criteria>
No: An unwelded state having a tunnel-like shape is not seen at any of the three positions mentioned above.
Acceptable: An unwelded state formed in the welded portion was seen at one of the three positions mentioned above.
Yes: A portion in the unwelded state formed in the welded portion was seen at two or more of the three positions mentioned above.
Table 3 shows the results of (I) determination of the existence or nonexistence of a surface defect by observing the appearance of a joint when a welding operation was performed once with a welding length of 0.5 m and the results of (II) determination of the existence or nonexistence of an internal defect by observing the cross section of a joint. In addition, tensile test pieces each of which had the dimensions of a No. 1 test specimen defined by JIS Z 3121 were taken from the obtained welding joints, and Table 3 shows tensile strengths obtained when a tensile test (JIS Z 3121) was performed by using the test pieces.
It was confirmed from Table 3 that, in the butt joints of Invention Examples 1 to 24 and the lap joints of Invention Examples 25 to 27, even when the welding speed was increased to 1.0 m or higher, a strongly-welded state was obtained with no surface defect found by observation of the appearance of each joint and no internal defect found by observation of the cross section of each joint. In addition, the obtained joint strengths were each 95% or more of the tensile strength of the steel plates serving as base materials.
In contrast, in the butt joints of Comparative Examples 1 to 3, welding was performed by using rotating tools each of which does not have a probe and each of which has vortex-shaped stepped portions extending in the clockwise direction while the direction of rotation of each of the rotating tools was set to the clockwise direction. A surface defect and an internal defect were observed in the obtained joints, and a strongly-welded state was not obtained. In addition, the obtained joint strengths were each 70% or less of the tensile strength of the steel plates serving as base materials.
In the lap joint of Comparative Example 4, welding was performed by using rotating tools each of which does not have a probe and each of which has vortex-shaped stepped portions extending in the clockwise direction while the direction of rotation of each of the rotating tools was set to the clockwise direction. A surface defect and an internal defect were observed in the obtained joint, and a strongly-welded state was not obtained. In addition, the obtained joint strength was 70% or less of the tensile strength of the steel plates serving as base materials.
In the butt joints of Comparative Examples 5 to 9, rotating tools each having a pin were used on the condition that all of D (the diameter (mm) of the end portion of each rotating tool), a (the inclination angle)(° of each rotating tool), and G (the distance (mm) between the end portions of the pair of rotating tools) satisfied the above formulas (1), (2) and (3).
In the butt joints of Comparative Examples 5 to 9, although it was confirmed that, even when the welding speed was increased to 1.0 m or higher, a strongly-welded state was obtained with no surface defect found by observation of the appearance of each joint and no internal defect found by observation of the cross section of each joint, it was confirmed that the durability of each of the rotating tools was unfavorable.
In the lap joint of Comparative Example 10, although it was confirmed that, even when the welding speed was increased to 1.0 m or higher, a strongly-welded state was obtained with no surface defect found by observation of the appearance of the joint and no internal defect found by observation of the cross section of the joint, it was confirmed that the durability of each of the rotating tools was unfavorable.
A welding operation with a welding length of 0.5 m was repeatedly performed, and Table 4 shows the number of times, out of the cumulative number of the welding operations, that a strong joint was obtained with a probability of 90% or more while no internal defect was found by observation of the cross section of the joint. As shown in Table 4, in the butt joints of Invention Examples 1 to 24 and the lap joints of Invention Examples 25 to 27, the number of the welding operations in which a strong joint was obtained with a probability of 90% or more was 13 or more.
In contrast, in the butt joints of Comparative Examples 1 to 3, the welding operation was performed by using rotating tools each of which does not have a probe and each of which has vortex-shaped stepped portions extending in the clockwise direction while the direction of rotation of each of the rotating tools was set to the clockwise direction. In Comparative Examples 1 to 3, the number of the welding operations in which a strong joint was obtained with a probability of 90% or more was zero.
In the lap joint of Comparative Example 4, the welding operation was performed by using rotating tools each of which does not have a probe and each of which has vortex-shaped stepped portions extending in the clockwise direction while the direction of rotation of each of the rotating tools was set to the clockwise direction. In Comparative Example 4, the number of the welding operations in which a strong joint was obtained with a probability of 90% or more was zero.
In the butt joints of Comparative Examples 5 to 9, the welding operation was performed by using rotating tools each having a pin, and the number of the welding operations in which a strong joint was obtained with a probability of 90% or more was 10 or less.
In the lap joint of Comparative Example 10, the welding operation was performed by using rotating tools each having a pin, and the number of the welding operations in which a strong joint was obtained with a probability of 90% or more was 10 or less.
As described above, it was revealed that, when welding was performed by using the rotating tools, each of which does not have a probe and each of which has vortex-shaped stepped portions extending in a direction the same as the rotation direction of the rotating tool, a defect occurred in the joint, or a problem occurred in the joint strength, and it was revealed that, when the rotating tools each having a pin were used, the durability of each of the rotating tools was unfavorable.
Experiments were conducted under the same conditions except for the existence or nonexistence of the vortex-shaped stepped portions in each pair of the above Invention Examples, that is, Invention Examples 1 and 4, Invention Examples 2 and 5, Invention Examples 3 and 6, Invention Examples 19 and 22, Invention Examples 20 and 23, and Invention Examples 21 and 24, and these experimental results shown in Table 3 have revealed that the use of rotating tools each of which has vortex-shaped stepped portions increased the weld strength of each joint.
In addition, the results obtained from Invention Examples 19 and 22 in which experiments were conducted under conditions that do not satisfy the following formula (5) have revealed that, when exceeding the range of the formula (5), although it is evaluated that there is no surface defect, it affects ensuring of plastic flow that is sufficient for welding, which may lead to occurrence of an internal defect. In other words, it is understood that, when rotating tools each having a concave surface further satisfy the condition of formula (5), occurrence of a surface defect and an internal defect can be more effectively suppressed, so that a joint having a sufficient strength can be obtained.
Dc/D≤0.03 Formula (5)
In addition, the results obtained from Invention Examples 20 and 23 in which experiments were conducted under conditions that fall below the lower limit of the range of the following formula (3) have revealed that, when falling below the lower limit of the range of formula (3), although the evaluations of surface defect and internal defect are acceptable, such conditions affect ensuring of uniform plastic flow in the plate-thickness direction, which may lead to occurrence of a surface defect and an internal defect. In other words, it is understood that, when rotating tools each having a planar surface further satisfy the condition of formula (3), occurrence of a surface defect and an internal defect can be more effectively suppressed, so that a joint having a sufficient strength can be obtained.
4×t≤D≤20×t formula (3)
The results obtained from Invention Examples 21 and 24 in which experiments were conducted under conditions that do not satisfy formula (1) have revealed that, when exceeding the range of formula (4), although the evaluations of surface defect and internal defect are acceptable, such conditions affect the shape of the surface of a welded portion, which may lead to occurrence of a surface defect. In other words, it is understood that, when rotating tools each having a convex surface further satisfy the condition of formula (4), occurrence of a surface defect and an internal defect can be more effectively suppressed, so that a joint having a sufficient strength can be obtained.
dv/D≤0.06 formula (4)
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-052622 | Mar 2018 | JP | national |
| 2019-005166 | Jan 2019 | JP | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/JP2019/011734 | 3/20/2019 | WO |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2019/182020 | 9/26/2019 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4811887 | King et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 5460317 | Thomas et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 7882998 | Roos | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 8052033 | Nakagawa | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8220694 | Nakagawa | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8286455 | Fujii et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 20020158109 | Gendoh | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20060086775 | Trapp | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060138197 | Aota | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060289608 | Steel | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20110132968 | Nakagawa et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110135954 | Nakagawa | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20170157720 | Sato | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20200164462 | Hori | May 2020 | A1 |
| 20200254556 | Hori | Aug 2020 | A1 |
| 20200282489 | Hori | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20230143286 | Rodriguez Suarez | May 2023 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 107150166 | Sep 2017 | CN |
| 2474382 | Jul 2012 | EP |
| 62183979 | Aug 1987 | JP |
| 07505090 | Jun 1995 | JP |
| 3261433 | Mar 2002 | JP |
| 2003181655 | Jul 2003 | JP |
| 2003290936 | Oct 2003 | JP |
| 2004195480 | Jul 2004 | JP |
| 2007301579 | Nov 2007 | JP |
| 2011115846 | Jun 2011 | JP |
| 4838385 | Dec 2011 | JP |
| 4838388 | Dec 2011 | JP |
| 2012066287 | Apr 2012 | JP |
| 5185103 | Apr 2013 | JP |
| 2015127063 | Jul 2015 | JP |
| 20020026887 | Apr 2002 | KR |
| 20100073269 | Jul 2010 | KR |
| 20170009978 | Jan 2017 | KR |
| 0183153 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| 2004110692 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| JP4838385 computer translation (Year: 2022). |
| JP-2007301579—A computer English translation (Year: 2023). |
| Computer English Translation of KR20110088266A (Year: 2011). |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201980019963.7, dated Jul. 2, 2021 with Concise Statement of Relevance of Office Action, 12 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 19 772 150.9, dated Mar. 26, 2021, 7 pages. |
| Korean Office Action for Korean Application No. 10-2020-7026318, dated Jun. 21, 2021, with Concise Statement of Relevance of Office Action, 6 pages. |
| Japanese Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2019-529679, dated Jun. 30, 2020, with Concise Statement of Relevance of Office Action, 5 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/JP2019/011734, dated May 12, 2019, 7 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 22195812.7, dated Jan. 10, 2023, 6 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210023650 A1 | Jan 2021 | US |
