The present invention relates to rotating vacuum fingers for removal or peeling off of print media, typically paper, from an impression drum, and, more particularly, but not exclusively to the removal of print media from a drum that prints multiple colors in multiple rotations or separations.
Vacuum fingers are hollow tubes that carry a vacuum, and have suckers at one end to transfer the suction to paper or any other print medium that it is desired to move, feed or remove within a printing, photocopying or any other environment in which paper feeding is necessary. The present disclosure relates specifically to rotary mounted vacuum fingers that are intended to counter-rotate in association with an impression drum, and remove the paper or other print medium from the impression drum following the application of the printing impression to the paper. In such a case the paper wraps onto the drum to receive the impression and then meets the vacuum finger which peels the paper from the drum.
Patents relating to rotary systems that utilize suckers to assist with feeding of paper in association with a drum include U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,431,384, 6,313,859, 6,639,622, 6,048,120, GB 735,477 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,120,143.
In a typical drum the paper rotates about the drum once, receives an impression with a single color ink and is then peeled away. However, in a recent development, multi-color print drums have become available in which several colors are applied to the paper in a spread of several rotations or separations, one color being applied per separation. Such a development has been enabled by inks that can easily be cleaned. In such a case, the paper meets the suction fingers at each separation, but suction is only applied at the end of the spread. In some cases up to seven colors may be applied in a spread, requiring seven separations. Suction is only applied following the last rotation.
Reference is now made to
The present inventors attempted to determine how the marks were formed. In doing so they studied the operation of the peeling process for removing paper from the impression drum. The peeling process is illustrated in
In use the drum 20 rotates and the paper rotates on the drum. A plurality of vacuum fingers 26 rotate, in the opposite sense to drum 20, about drive shaft 28, such that the vacuum fingers touch the edge of the drum tangentially at one point in their rotation, the point at which the paper is to be peeled from the drum. At the point of peeling, the rotational velocities at the center of the suction cap and of the paper are matched so as to minimize any impact damage of the suction cap on the paper and allow the vacuum fingers to peel the paper smoothly from the drum.
The present inventors studied the above mechanism for possible causes of the impact damage and it was noted that the suction caps have a finite radius and that the rotational velocities between the suction cap and the paper are only matched for a certain point on that radius. That is to say the velocity can be matched for the center of the suction cap in which case there is a speed mismatch with the brim 30 of the cap, or the speed can be matched with the brim 30, in which case there is a mismatch with the center. Either way there is a possible cause for impact damage. Furthermore the brim 30 of the suction cap extends outwardly beyond the circumference described by the locus of travel of the center of the suction cap, meaning that the brim presumably impacts and attempts to dig in to the paper at its point of initial contact.
The impacts are presumably made worse in the case of multi-color printing in a spread over multiple separations. As explained above, the vacuum is switched off when additional rotations of the paper are required for remaining colors, however the fingers continue to rotate and impacts still occur even during rotations when the paper is not peeled from the drum, simply making the impact damage more noticeable.
A number of prior art patents describe uses of suckers in ways that do not impact the medium being fed, but none of these are suitable for paper pick up from a rotary drum. U.S. Pat. No. 5,997,458 describes a rotary object feeder in which suckers are used to transfer cardboard objects. The suckers are mounted on a planetary device and thus are not suitable for paper feed from a drum. In the same context U.S. Pat. No. 5,511,722 teaches an offset rotary mechanism for transferring cartons from a stack to a belt. Again the system is not intended for paper feeding from a rotating drum.
Finally U.S. Pat. No. 5,431,384 teaches a pickup and transfer roller in which the entire roller is lifted during part of the transfer cycle.
The present inventors recognized a need for a paper peeling system for removing paper from a drum, which is devoid of the above limitations.
According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a printing and peeling arrangement comprising:
an impression drum for supporting a print medium for receipt of a printing image, and
at least one rotating vacuum finger for applying vacuum to the print medium to remove the print medium from the impression drum after receipt of the printing image, wherein the vacuum finger is mounted for a radial component of motion towards the impression drum.
In an embodiment, the vacuum finger is mounted on a rotating shaft via a cam, and wherein the cam is configured to apply the radial component of motion towards the impression drum.
The cam may be configured via a lobe orientated towards the drum.
The vacuum finger may have a radius of rotation which is insufficient to reach the drum but which is sufficient to reach the drum when riding on the lobe.
The cam may be disconnectable, thereby to provide an idling motion in which the radial motion is not transferred to the vacuum finger.
The vacuum finger may comprise a suction head for applying the vacuum to the print medium, the suction head having an outer radius greater than an outer radius of the vacuum finger, and the radial motion is sufficient to prevent an impact of the outer radius of the suction head with the print medium.
A rate of rotation of the vacuum finger may be such as to equalize a velocity of the suction head with the print medium at a point of touch.
In an embodiment, the impression drum has a rotation in a first sense when printing and the vacuum finger is configured to rotate in the opposite sense, thereby to achieve the equalized velocity.
The vacuum finger may be connected via a flexible vacuum tube to a vacuum source.
The printer is typically a multi-color printing arrangement able to apply impressions in a spread involving different colors at successive separations.
According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a peeling apparatus for peeling a print medium from an impression drum after application of an impression to the print medium, the apparatus comprising a vacuum finger and mounting therefor, the mounting comprising a shaft and a cam, the vacuum finger being mounted radially about the shaft thereby to rotate about the shaft and further being mounted on the cam, the cam being configured with a lobe to add a radial motion component to the vacuum finger upon the rotation, the lobe being aligned such that the radial motion component describes a linear approach to the impression drum.
The cam may be disconnectable, thereby to provide an idling motion in which the radial motion component is not transferred to the vacuum finger.
In an embodiment, the vacuum finger comprises a suction head for applying a vacuum to the print medium, the suction head having an outer radius greater than an outer radius of the vacuum finger, and the radial motion is sufficient to prevent an impact of the outer radius of the suction head with the print medium.
In an embodiment, a rate of rotation of the vacuum finger is such as to equalize a velocity of the suction head with the print medium at a point of touch.
Preferably, the impression drum has a rotation in a first sense when printing and the vacuum finger is configured to rotate in the opposite sense, thereby to achieve the equalized velocity.
The vacuum finger may be connected via a flexible vacuum tube to a vacuum source.
The apparatus may be part of a multi-color printing system able to apply impressions in different colors at successive rotations.
According to a third aspect of the present invention there is provided a method for peeling a print medium from a rotating drum, the drum rotating in a first sense, the method using a plurality of vacuum fingers having suction caps mounted in proximity to the rotating drum and being able to apply vacuum via the vacuum fingers to the suction caps, the method comprising:
rotating the vacuum fingers with a rotary motion in a second opposite sense, and
applying a linear component to the rotary motion such as to cause the vacuum fingers to extend linearly outwards upon approaching the drum to contact the print medium and retract linearly upon receding from the drum.
The method may comprise disconnecting the linear component to provide an idling motion in which the print medium is not contacted.
The method may comprise:
disconnecting the linear component to provide an idling motion of the vacuum fingers in which the print medium is not contacted,
carrying out a predetermined number of rotations of the drum,
reconnecting the linear component for a further rotation of the drum, and
peeling the paper from the drum at the final rotation.
The method may comprise applying an impression using a different color ink for each rotation.
According to a fourth aspect of the present invention there is provided a method for peeling a print medium from a rotating drum, the drum rotating in a first sense, the method comprising:
mounting a plurality of vacuum fingers having suction caps in proximity to the rotating drum,
applying vacuum via the vacuum fingers to the suction caps,
rotating the vacuum fingers with a rotary motion in a second opposite sense, and
applying a linear component to the rotary motion such as to cause the vacuum fingers to extend linearly outwards upon approaching the drum to contact the print medium and retract linearly upon receding from the drum.
Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. The materials, methods, and examples provided herein are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting.
The invention is herein described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings. With specific reference now to the drawings in detail, it is stressed that the particulars shown are by way of example and for purposes of illustrative discussion of the preferred embodiments of the present invention only, and are presented in order to provide what is believed to be the most useful and readily understood description of the principles and conceptual aspects of the invention. In this regard, no attempt is made to show structural details of the invention in more detail than is necessary for a fundamental understanding of the invention, the description taken with the drawings making apparent to those skilled in the art how the several forms of the invention may be embodied in practice.
In the drawings:
The present embodiments comprise a peeling mechanism for peeling a print medium from an impression drum in which a radial component is added to the rotary motion of a vacuum finger as it approaches the paper. The finger is slightly too short on its own to reach the impression drum without moving radially outwards. The radial motion ensures that the brim of the suction cap approaches the paper radially rather than tangentially and therefore avoids both impacts due to any overextension of the brim from the circumference of travel of the vacuum finger and damage due to any mismatch in velocities between the brim and the paper as the brim strikes the print medium.
The radial motion may be achieved by use of a non-rotating cam within the mounting of the vacuum finger. The cam has a lobe and the lobe is orientated towards the point at which the rotations of the vacuum finger and the drum meet. The vacuum finger simply rides over the cam.
The principles and operation of a paper peeling mechanism according to the present invention may be better understood with reference to the drawings and accompanying description.
Before explaining at least one embodiment of the invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments or of being practiced or carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.
Reference is now made to
The arrangement comprises rotating vacuum fingers such as finger 40, for applying vacuum to the paper or like print medium to peel paper from the impression drum after printing. The vacuum finger 40 is mounted so as to move radially towards the impression drum at the point at which the paper is peeled from the drum.
Vacuum finger 40 may be mounted radially from a rotating shaft 42 in such a way that rotation of the shaft is transferred to the finger 40, and the finger rotates with the shaft. The finger is however mounted in such a manner that it has a certain freedom of motion in the radial direction so that it can be pulled outwards to describe a greater radius or inwards to describe a smaller radius about the shaft 42. A non-circular cam 44, which does not itself rotate, and which has an lobe 46, is fitted over the shaft at the point at which the finger is mounted thereon and the finger is arranged to ride over the cam with the help of cam follower 48, so that the cam now defines a radial component for the motion of the finger. The lobe 46 is aligned with the point at which the paper is to be peeled from the drum.
The finger has, at its far end from the rotating shaft 42, a suction cap 50 for applying vacuum to the paper. The suction cap has a brim 52 with an outer radius which is greater than the outer radius of the vacuum finger and would normally travel outside the circumference of the finger in regular rotational motion. However the cam is sized such as to provide a radial approach of the suction cap to the paper which is sufficient to prevent an impact of the outer or brim radius with the paper.
The rate of rotation of the end of the vacuum finger is selected to equalize the velocity of the suction cap with the paper at the point of touch. The equalization of the rotational velocity together with the application of the radial motion ensures that there is no impact damage.
As the radius of the vacuum finger changes during rotation, flexible tube 54 is provided which links the hollow interior of the vacuum finger 40 with a hollow interior 56, of the shaft 42. Thus vacuum may be supplied to the paper from the suction cap via the hollow tube within the finger, which in turn obtains the vacuum from the hollow interior 56 of the rotary shaft and ultimately from a vacuum source.
It will be appreciated that there is generally provided a number of vacuum fingers as necessary to peel the paper in the most efficient manner possible from the drum.
Reference is now made to
As referred to above, certain impression drums perform multi-color printing in a spread by applying different impressions using different color inks at different separations, each separation involving a rotation of the drum. Thus the paper remains on the drum for all of the separations of the spread and is not peeled from the drum until all of the rotations are complete. For example in seven color printing, the paper rotates seven times but is only peeled from the drum at the seventh rotation.
In order to avoid impact damage from the suction caps during the initial six rotations, it is possible simply to disconnect the rotation of the vacuum fingers from their respective cams or more simply to detach the cams. Thus the suction heads do not in fact approach the paper at all during the initial rotations.
The procedure is illustrated in the simplified flow chart of
With the prior art, the n-color printing spread shown in
It is expected that during the life of this patent many relevant printing systems, paper feed mechanisms and paper peeling mechanisms and systems will be developed and the scope of the corresponding terms herein are intended to include all such new technologies a priori.
It is appreciated that certain features of the invention, which are, for clarity, described in the context of separate embodiments, may also be provided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features of the invention, which are, for brevity, described in the context of a single embodiment, may also be provided separately or in any suitable subcombination.
Although the invention has been described in conjunction with specific embodiments thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and broad scope of the appended claims.
All publications, patents and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated in their entirety by reference into the specification, to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated herein by reference. In addition, citation or identification of any reference in this application shall not be construed as an admission that such reference is available as prior art to the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2395497 | Nordquist | Feb 1946 | A |
2568069 | Herr | Sep 1951 | A |
2714006 | Layden | Jul 1955 | A |
2936681 | Earp | May 1960 | A |
3026989 | Schaltegger | Mar 1962 | A |
3385595 | Benatar et al. | May 1968 | A |
3386558 | Benatar | Jun 1968 | A |
3575409 | Calvert | Apr 1971 | A |
3599541 | Allen | Aug 1971 | A |
3663012 | Van Den Honert | May 1972 | A |
3992993 | Kuhn et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4018161 | Johne et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4024814 | Becker | May 1977 | A |
4127265 | Wirz et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4241659 | Fischer | Dec 1980 | A |
4343241 | Rudolph et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4378734 | Wirz | Apr 1983 | A |
4667531 | Kato et al. | May 1987 | A |
4790244 | Otfried et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
5028044 | Fischer | Jul 1991 | A |
5029524 | Wirz et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5054761 | Dietrich et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5142983 | Kobler et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5308056 | Achelpohl | May 1994 | A |
5426920 | Quadalti | Jun 1995 | A |
5431384 | Obermiller | Jul 1995 | A |
5480138 | Haupenthal et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5511722 | Dixon | Apr 1996 | A |
5645680 | Rietheimer | Jul 1997 | A |
5653671 | Reuteler | Aug 1997 | A |
5997458 | Guttinger | Dec 1999 | A |
6048120 | Kerr | Apr 2000 | A |
6120143 | Narushima | Sep 2000 | A |
6313859 | Kerr | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6385431 | Arcaro et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6438352 | Landa et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6488274 | Hansch | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6578846 | Maul et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6639622 | Kerr | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6698749 | Muller | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6851672 | Shmaiser et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6912952 | Landa et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
7273343 | Ziegler | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7306222 | Kaya et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
20040245697 | Kaya et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070001391 A1 | Jan 2007 | US |