Traditional fixed-wing aircraft generally require long runways or launching systems to provide a distance for the aircraft to build sufficient speed to generate lift for flight. And runways are generally required for fixed-wing aircraft to land. Some aircraft, such as tailsitter aircraft and rotorcraft (including multirotor aircraft), avoid a need for horizontal space for take-off and landing by taking off and landing vertically. Tailsitter aircraft generally take off from (and land on) their tails, pitching between vertical and horizontal orientations for flight in midair.
But rotorcraft are not optimal for efficient horizontal flight because the rotor(s) must provide both lift and forward thrust. And tailsitter aircraft can be prone to tipping when landing or taking off in a vertical configuration due to a high center of gravity. A wide landing base is required to prevent the tailsitter from tipping over, especially when landing or taking off in windy conditions or from uneven ground.
Existing tailsitter aircraft may include a wide landing base or landing legs in the form of large vertical tails or fins. But such large tails or fins are not necessary for horizontal flight, so they reduce performance by increasing drag and weight. And some existing tailsitter aircraft may have large, retractable landing legs but these legs also require unnecessary increases to aircraft weight. Accordingly, existing tailsitter aircraft sacrifice performance (such as weight or aerodynamic qualities) in order to provide landing and ground stability.
A tailsitter aircraft includes one or more rotatable wings. The tailsitter aircraft optionally includes a fuselage from which wing supports extend. Each rotatable wing optionally includes a rotatable wing section having an inboard portion proximate to the fuselage, and an outboard portion distal from the fuselage. The rotatable wing section may be rotatably attached to the wing support and configured to rotate between a vertical flight configuration in which the inboard portion is positioned on an opposing side of the wing support relative to the outboard portion, and a horizontal flight configuration different from the vertical flight configuration. Other features and advantages will appear hereinafter. The features described above can be used separately or together, or in various combinations of one or more of them.
In the drawings, wherein the same reference number indicates the same element throughout the views:
The present technology is directed to rotating wing assemblies for tailsitter aircraft, and aircraft having rotating wings. Various embodiments of the technology will now be described. The following description provides specific details for a thorough understanding and enabling description of these embodiments. One skilled in the art will understand, however, that the invention may be practiced without many of these details. Additionally, some well-known structures or functions, such as structures or functions common to aircraft, may not be shown or described in detail so as to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the relevant description of the various embodiments. Accordingly, the technology may have other embodiments with additional elements or without several of the elements described below with reference to
The terminology used in the description presented below is intended to be interpreted in its broadest reasonable manner, even though it is being used in conjunction with a detailed description of certain specific embodiments of the invention. Certain terms may even be emphasized below; however, any terminology intended to be interpreted in any restricted manner will be overtly and specifically defined as such in this detailed description section.
Where the context permits, singular or plural terms may also include the plural or singular term, respectively. Moreover, unless the word “or” is expressly limited to mean only a single item exclusive from the other items in a list of two or more items, then the use of “or” in such a list is to be interpreted as including (a) any single item in the list, (b) all of the items in the list, or (c) any combination of items in the list. Further, unless otherwise specified, terms such as “attached” or “connected” are intended to include integral connections, as well as connections between physically separate components.
Specific details of several embodiments of the present technology are described herein with reference to unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or standalone wings using rotors or propellers for propulsion. In other embodiments, the technology may be used in manned or passenger-carrying aircraft, or in aircraft using other types of propulsion including, for example, turbofan propulsion, turbojet propulsion (or other jet propulsion), ramjet propulsion, rocket propulsion, or other suitable propulsion systems.
The present technology provides rotating wing assemblies for tailsitter aircraft, and aircraft having rotating wings. Examples of this technology are illustrated in
As shown in
One such fully rotated position in accordance with an embodiment of the present technology is generally illustrated in
In particular embodiments of the present technology, each pivot axis 210 may be centrally located along a wingspan 400, or it may be located in other positions. For example, the distance 410 from a wing root 420 to the pivot axis 210 may be between approximately 10 percent and 90 percent of the wingspan 400. Such locations of the pivot axis 210 allow a portion of the wing 110—for example, a portion having the root 420—to be positioned above the pivot axis 210, the wing supports 220, or a center of gravity of the aircraft, while another portion—for example, a portion having a wing tip 430—may be positioned below the pivot axis 210, the wing supports 220, or the center of gravity of the aircraft. Such arrangements may provide a stable base for the aircraft 100 when it is landing or taking off vertically in a tailsitter orientation, as further described below. The pivot axis 210 may be provided by a joint, such as a hinge, a joint assembly, or another suitable interface capable of providing relative rotation between the wing 110 and a wing support 220.
In some embodiments, the pivot axis 210 need not be located between approximately 10 percent and 90 percent of the wingspan 400. Rather, the pivot axis 210 may be located in a position sufficient to provide a stable base for a tailsitter orientation of the aircraft 100 (generally illustrated in
In the embodiment shown in
In some embodiments, the aircraft 100 may have one or more landing gear units or landing legs 510 to support the aircraft 100 when it is on a surface in a vertical take-off or landing position. For example, the landing leg(s) 510 may be attached to end portions of the wings 110 to provide spacing for a stable tailsitter landing orientation when the wings 110 are rotated (as illustrated in
In operation, an aircraft 100 may take off in a generally upward direction in a nose-first, vertical configuration, such as a configuration generally illustrated and described with regard to
To land in a vertical configuration (for example, as illustrated in
Aircraft in accordance with embodiments of the present technology provide vertical take-off and landing configurations (such as a tailsitter or multirotor configurations) and horizontal flight configurations while avoiding excess weight and drag associated with structure that is generally used only for one configuration or the other.
In various embodiments of the present technology, the wings 110 may be rotated using various mechanisms, such as one or more belt drives, gear drives, linkages to motors or actuators, rack and pinion systems, electrical motor systems, hydraulic systems, or other suitable mechanisms capable of rotating the wings 110 about the pivot axes 210. In other embodiments, aerodynamic effects may be used to manipulate the wings 110. For example, the moment of force from an aileron or torque induced from propulsion, including propwash, may be used to rotate the wings 110.
Rotatable portions of wings of the present technology may, but need not, include the entire length of the wings. For example,
In several embodiments of the present technology, the wings (for example, 110, 910) need not rotate to equal angles to accommodate a vertical landing or take-off configuration.
As described above, in some embodiments, wings may provide lift during the transition between vertical and horizontal flight configurations. As another example,
Each wing 1810 may be provided with an airfoil cross-section. For example, an airfoil top surface 1870 may be positioned opposite an airfoil lower surface 1880 on each wing 1810. One such lower surface 1880 may face towards the fuselage 1830, while the other lower surface 1880 may face away from the fuselage 1830. In such a configuration, each wing 1810 may provide lift for the aircraft 1800 during and after the aircraft's 1800 maneuver to pitch forward into horizontal flight from vertical flight. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the aircraft 1800 may fly nose-first in horizontal flight with the wings 1810 in the configuration illustrated in
Each wing 1810 may have one or more propulsion systems 1860, which may be similar to other propulsion systems disclosed herein (for example, rotors 140) for providing lift during vertical flight or thrust during horizontal flight. The aircraft 1800 may have landing support structure extending from the wings 1810 or from the fuselage 1830 (for example, landing legs 510 illustrated in
Specifically,
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that specific embodiments of the disclosed technology have been described for purposes of illustration, but that various modifications may be made without deviating from the technology, and elements of certain embodiments may be interchanged with those of other embodiments. For example, in some embodiments, various types and quantities of aircraft propulsion systems may be used and there may be various numbers of wing supports (for example, 220, 710, 810, 940) or wings. In yet further embodiments, landing legs (for example, landing legs 510) may be deployable and retractable, or omitted in favor of other landing support structure. Although various embodiments disclosed herein may utilize various aerodynamic control structures—such as stabilizers, canards, ailerons, elevons, or other aerodynamic structures—such structures are not necessary in every embodiment, and may be omitted or combined in various embodiments.
Further, while advantages associated with certain embodiments of the disclosed technology have been described in the context of those embodiments, other embodiments may also exhibit such advantages, and not all embodiments need necessarily exhibit such advantages to fall within the scope of the technology. Accordingly, the disclosure and associated technology may encompass other embodiments not expressly shown or described herein, and the invention is not limited except as by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/091,456, filed Apr. 5, 2016, and now pending, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1603711 | Peck et al. | Oct 1926 | A |
1662406 | Thompson | Mar 1928 | A |
1804312 | Brown | May 1931 | A |
1928326 | Bratu | Sep 1933 | A |
1951817 | Blount et al. | Mar 1934 | A |
2014377 | Fitzgerald | Sep 1935 | A |
D113019 | Silverstein | Jan 1939 | S |
2481502 | Downing | Sep 1949 | A |
2578578 | Myers et al. | Dec 1951 | A |
2621001 | Roman et al. | Dec 1952 | A |
2678783 | Myers | May 1954 | A |
3000593 | Haberkorn et al. | Sep 1961 | A |
3142455 | Wilford | Jul 1964 | A |
3408767 | Anderson | Nov 1968 | A |
3586262 | Sherman | Jun 1971 | A |
4336914 | Thomson | Jun 1982 | A |
4410151 | Hoppner et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4471923 | Hoppner et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4667899 | Wedertz | May 1987 | A |
5108051 | Montet et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5192037 | Moorefield | Mar 1993 | A |
5423706 | Chase | Jun 1995 | A |
5765783 | Albion | Jun 1998 | A |
5782427 | Hermach et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5823468 | Bothe et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5890441 | Swinson | Apr 1999 | A |
6056237 | Woodland | May 2000 | A |
6098927 | Gevers | Aug 2000 | A |
6186443 | Shaffer | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6367738 | Wadleigh et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
D461159 | Miralles et al. | Aug 2002 | S |
6561455 | Capanna et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6655631 | Austen-Brown et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
7185847 | Bouchard et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7410124 | Miller et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7506837 | Parks et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
8256704 | Lundgren et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8434710 | Hothi et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8505846 | Sanders et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8602348 | Bryant et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8876039 | Lubenow et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9187174 | Shaw | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9481457 | Alber | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9550567 | Beckman et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9567088 | Godlasky et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9731820 | Ogawa et al. | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9821909 | Moshe | Nov 2017 | B2 |
20020074452 | Ingram et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20040026563 | Moller et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050006525 | Byers et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050178879 | Mao et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050274845 | Miller et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20090045295 | Lundgren et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100252690 | Hothi et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110042509 | Bevirt et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110226174 | Parks | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110315806 | Piasecki et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120091257 | Wolff et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120205488 | Powell et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120261523 | Shaw et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120280080 | Lubenow et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120286102 | Sinha et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130146716 | Gettinger | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130206921 | Paduano et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20150102157 | Godlasky et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150225071 | Tighe | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150267996 | Su et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160311545 | Parks et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160378120 | Creasman et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2132289 | Jun 1999 | RU |
2011066400 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2012113576 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2013048339 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2016003530 | Jan 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Advanced VTOL Technologies, “Products: Hammerhead VTOL Aircraft”, http://www.avtolt.com/products/hammerhead.php, exact publication date unknown (web page last visited Mar. 22, 2016). |
Boeing, “Heliwing Aircraft” 1995. |
Carey, Bill, “Helicopter Operator Places Launch Order for Flexrotor UAV”, Aviation International News Online, http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/aerospace/2015-01-05/helicopter-operator-places-launch-order-flexrotor-uav, Jan. 15, 2015. |
Eshel, Tamir, “Sikorsky, Aurora Flight Sciences to Develop VTOL X-Planes for DARPA”, Defense Update, http://defense-update.com/20131213_sikorsky-aurora-flight-sciences-develop-vtol-x-planes-darpa.html, Dec. 13, 2013. |
Industry Network Engineering and Services, “Unmanned aircraft”, Industry Network Engineering and Services, http://www.industry.co.jp/ines/, exact publication date unknown, (web page last visited Mar. 18, 2016). |
Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, “Four-engine told wing VTOL aircraft”, Aeronautical Technology Directorate, http://www.aero.jaxa.jp/eng/research/frontier/vtol/qtw/, exact publication date unknown (web page last visited Mar. 22, 2016). |
Krossblade Aerospace Systems LLC, “Krossblade SkyProwler Multi-Mission Vtol Transformer Drone”, Kickstarter Campaign, https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/350745213/krossblade-skyprowler-multi-mission-vtoltransform/updates, exact publication date unknown, (web page last visited Mar. 18, 2016). |
Lak, “LAK Genesis 2 Glider”, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LAK_Genesis_2, 1994, 2 pgs. |
Lee, R.E., “Convair XFY-1 Pogo”, National Air and Space Museum, http://airandspace.si.edu/collections/artifact.cfm?object=nasm_A19730274000, Sep. 18, 2000. |
Liszewski, Andrew, “Tilting Wings Let This New Air Hogs RC Plane Hover Like a Helicopter”, Toyland Blog, http://toyland.gizmodo.com/tilting-wings-let-this-new-air-hogs-rc-plane-hover-like-1720002243, Jul. 24, 2015. |
Madrigal, Alexis C., “Inside Google's Secret Drone-Delivery Program”, The Atlantic, http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/08/inside-googles-secret-drone-delivery-program/379306/, Aug. 28, 2014. |
Moore, Mark D., “NASA Puffin Electric Tailsitter VTOL Concept”, NASA Technical Reports Server, http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20110011311.pdf, Sep. 13, 2010. |
RC Groups, “Discussion: Tail Sitting VTOL,” http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1473333&page=4, Aug. 9, 2011. |
Stone, H. et al., “Preliminary Design of a Tandem-Wing Tail-Sitter UAV Using Multi-Disciplinary Design Optimisation”, Intl Aerospace Congress, Sydney, AU, Feb. 1997, 707-720. |
Stone, H. et al., “The T-Wing: A VTOL UAV for Defense and Civilian Applications”, UAV Australia Conference, Melbourne, AU, Feb. 2001, 13 pgs. |
Stone, R. H. et al., “Optimization of Transition Manoeuvres for a Tail-Sitter Unmanned Air Vehicle (UAV)”, Australian International Aerospace Congress, Paper 105, Canberra, AU, Mar. 2001, 14 pgs. |
SUAS News, “Arcturus UAV Upgrades the JUMP15 VTOL UAV”, sUAS News, http://www.suasnews.com/2014/12/arcturus-uav-upgrades-the-jump15-vtol-uav/, Dec. 5, 2014. |
SUAS News, “Sony Ventures Unveils Drone Prototype”, sUAS News, http://www.suasnews.com/2015/08/sony-venture-unveils-drone-prototype/, Aug. 24, 2015. |
SUAS News, “The Airbus Group's Quadcruiser concept is validated in flight tests”, sUAS News, http://www.suasnews.com/2014/12/the-airbus-groups-quadcruiser-concept-is-validated-in-flight-tests/, Dec. 8, 2014. |
SUAS News, “Vertex VTOL UAV”, sUAS News, http://www.suasnews.com/2014/12/vertex-vtol-uav/, Dec. 26, 2014. |
University of Sydney, “University of Sydney T-Wing Website”, http://www.aeromech.usyd.edu.au/uav/twing/Sep. 2002. |
USPTO, “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, for PCT/US14/60166, dated Jun. 25, 2015, 11 pgs. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action”, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/460,013, dated Feb. 23, 2016, 18 pgs. |
USPTO, “Non-Final Office Action” for U.S. Appl. No. 15/932,993, dated Feb. 14, 2017, 10 pgs. |
Wikipedia, “Tail-sitter”, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tail-sitter, exact publication date unknown, (web page last visited Mar. 18, 2016). |
xCraft, “X PlusOne”, http://xcraft.io/x-plusone-droner, exact publication date unknown, (web page last visited Mar. 18, 2016). |
Xylakantsky, Ivan, “Chinese VTOL UAV VMA-01”, YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNTZ14ecUs8, Jun. 6, 2012. |
USPTO , “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, for PCT/US17/22262, dated Nov. 21, 2017, 9 pgs. |
Japanese Patent Office, First Office Action for Patent Application No. 2016-522724. dated Jun. 12, 2018. 12 pages. |
Aerovironment, Unmanned Aircraft Systems, available at: https://www.avinc.com/uas/adc/, website copyright 2018, exact publication date unknown, web page visited Aug. 31, 2018. |
Aerovironment, Switchblade Datasheet, available at https://www.avinc.com/images/uploads/product_docs/SB_Datesheet_2017_Web_rv1.1.pdf, copyright 2017, exact publication date unknown, web page visited Aug. 31, 2018. |
Area-I Inc., “ALTIUS in the News,” available at: https://areai.aero/aircraft/altius-air-launched-tube-integrated-unmanned-system/, website copyright 2018, exact publication date unknown, web page visited Aug. 31, 2018. |
Area-I Inc., “Tube Launched Aircraft,” available at https://areai.aero/aircraft/tube-launched-aircraft/, website copyright 2018, exact publication date unknown, web page visited Aug. 31, 2018. |
Espacenet, English Machine Translation of Weissenmayer WO 2012/113576, retrieved from espacenet.com on various dates: abstract translation dated Jul. 26, 2018, description translation dated Oct. 1, 2018, claims translation dated Dec. 7, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180072413 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15091456 | Apr 2016 | US |
Child | 15801833 | US |