The invention relates to a rotation damper for a motor vehicle.
Rotation dampers that are used to suppress structural vibrations of a motor vehicle are known from prior art. For example, DE 102011 101 350 A1 discloses a damping element for damping of relative movements between a first mass arranged on the wheel suspension side and a second mass arranged on the side of the vehicle body. In this case, the damper element is equipped with at least one rotatable damping part, which is mechanically coupled to the movement and can be displaced into a rotary movement by means of a movable lifting element, wherein at least one spring damping element is integrated in a mechanical movement coupling provided between the lifting element and the rotatable damping part.
The object of the invention is to provide a rotary damper for motor vehicle, which is provided with a compact design, and in which the damping effect is attributable to a gyroscopically acting flywheel cardanically mounted on the body of the motor vehicle.
The rotation damper according to the invention for a motor vehicle comprises a flywheel driven by a drive and operated about a rotation axis with the angular velocity ωφ, which is cardanically mounted via a first bearing element and a second bearing element. For this purpose, the flywheel is rotatably mounted on a first bearing element at an angle of rotation φ, and the first bearing element is mounted rotatably on a second bearing element at a first rotation angle Θ about a first axis that is aligned orthogonally to the axis of rotation of the flywheel, and the second bearing element is rotatably mounted on the body of the motor vehicle at a second angle of rotation Ψ aligned orthogonally with the first axis. In addition, the first bearing element is in operational connection with a shaft drive, and the second bearing element can be connected via a means with a wheel carrier of the motor vehicle body, so that with an inward/outward movement of the wheel carrier, a rotational movement of the second bearing element is caused relative to the body of the motor vehicle at a second angle of rotation Ψ. Moreover, the rotation damper also comprises a control device, which controls via the shaft drive the angular velocity ωΘ and/or the torque MΘ of the first bearing element about the first axis as a function of the rotation angle Ψ and/or of the torque MT of the second bearing element about the second axis.
According to an embodiment of the rotation damper according to the invention, the first bearing element is in this case designed in the form of a hollow shaft, so that the flywheel is rotatably mounted in its interior at an angle of rotation ω. In addition, the second bearing element is provided with two bearing legs oriented orthogonally to the second axis, and with two bearing struts that are connected to each other and oriented parallel to the second axis, wherein the first bearing element is rotatably mounted between the two bearing struts at the first rotational angle Θ.
With the design according to the invention, a rotation damper is provided in which the damping effect is attributable to a gyroscopically acting flywheel that is cardanically mounted on the body of the motor vehicle and which is provided with a particularly compact construction thanks to the construction of the second bearing element designed as a hollow shaft.
According to a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention, the flywheel is designed in the form of a shaft provided with a circumferential ring—hereinafter referred to as a flywheel shaft—wherein the flywheel shaft is formed as a hollow part in whose interior is integrated the drive of the flywheel. This embodiment has the advantage that due to the nested arrangement of the flywheel shaft and the drive arranged therein, a particularly space-saving construction is enabled.
It is in this case preferred when the integrated drive is designed as an electric motor that is integrated in the flywheel shaft, whose stator is fixedly connected to the first bearing element and whose rotor is designed as a flywheel shaft that is formed as a hollow part.
It is preferred when the flywheel shaft, which is designed as a hollow part, is designed with a rib structure. The rib structure has proven to be particularly advantageous because on the one hand, a weight-optimized construction is enabled in this manner, and on the other hand, cooling of the electric motor that is arranged in the interior is also ensured based on the ribs.
According to a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention, the circumferential ring is formed from a material that is different from the rest of the material of the flywheel shaft, wherein the material of the circumferential ring has a higher density than the rest of the material of the flywheel. This ensures that the inertia sensor of the flywheel, which is required for the gyroscopic effect, is provided with a compact design.
It is also preferred when the first bearing element is arranged in a housing arranged on the second bearing element. This proved to be advantageous because it protects the first bearing element, which is rotatable relative to the second bearing element, against external influences such as falling rocks.
The shaft drive of the first bearing element is preferably flanged on a baring strut of the second bearing element. The shaft motor is preferably designed in the form of an electric motor.
According to another preferred embodiment of the invention, a stop limiting the rotary movement of the first bearing element is arranged between the first and the second bearing element, wherein the stop is arranged in such a way that the angle of rotation of the first bearing element is limited to the interval −π/2<θ<+π/2. This ensures in a simple and constructive manner that a singularity, which is to say that “superimposition” of the axis of rotation of the flywheel and of the axis of rotation of the bearing element, will be prevented.
Further advantages, features and possible applications of the present invention will become apparent from the following description in conjunction with the embodiment illustrated in the figure.
The drawings show:
The rotation damper 10 comprises a flywheel 14 rotating about an axis of rotation 12 with the angular velocity ωφ that is cardanically mounted via a first bearing element 16 and a second bearing element 18.
Therefore, the flywheel 14 is rotatably mounted at the angle of rotation φ on the bearing element 16, and the first bearing element 16 is rotatably mounted on the second bearing element 18 at a angle of rotation Θ of the first axis 16a oriented orthogonally to the axis of rotation 12, and the second bearing element 18 is rotatably mounted on the motor vehicle body 100 at a second angle of rotation Ψ about a second axis 18a oriented orthogonally to the first axis 16a.
The schematically illustrated rotation damper 10 uses the effect of rotational inertia in order to initiate the forces in the vehicle chassis. These forces are intended to replace and extend the function of a conventional damping element.
The following is a brief explanation of the functional principle”
In the initial state, the flywheel 14 rotates with the angular velocity ωφ about the axis of rotation 12. When a torque MΘ is effective at the first axis 16a of the first bearing element 16, a torque MΨ is created due to the precession about the second axis 18a. The momentums lead to an angular velocity of the first or of the second bearing element 16, 18. Consequently, a torque MΘ leads to an angular velocity ωφ of the first bearing element 16. This rotation changes the direction of the angular velocity vector ωφ of the flywheel 14. The flywheel 14 reacts to such a disturbance with the precession momentum MΨ mentioned above. However, since the angular velocity ωφ, which is construction dependent, also changes the angular velocity vector ωφ of the flywheel 14, there is a direct influence on all three axes. The introduction of energy in an axis indicates a change of the energy of both other axes. If the second bearing element 18 is considered as an input, then MΨ and ωφ are aligned in the same direction. This energy can be removed again on the first axis 16a of the first bearing element 16, so that MΘ and ωφ are oriented in opposite directions. The opposite case is also possible. When components MΨ and ωφ are aligned in the same direction, this leads to unequally oriented amounts of MΨ and ωφ. If all of the energy of the torque MΘ is not removed, then the angular velocity of ωφ of the flywheel 14 will be increased as a result of the feedback effect. The excess energy is stored in the form of kinetic energy in the rotational movement of the flywheel 14. The transmission ratio of the individual momentums is in this case determined by the inertia levels of the flywheel 14.
If the second bearing element 18 is connected with a wheel carrier so that an inward/outward movement of the wheel carrier causes a torque MΨ and an angular velocity ωΨ of the second bearing element 18 about the second axis 18a, a relative movement of the bearing element 16 about the first axis 16a is created. If a counter-momentum MΘ to the angular velocity of the first bearing element 16 is applied, the relative movement of the bearing element 16 about the first axis 16a will be damped. This leads again to the damping of the angular velocity ωΨ of the second bearing element 18 about the second axis 18a. The damping will be stronger or weaker depending on the magnitude of the component of the counter-momentum MΘ.
On the other hand, if a momentum MΘ that is oriented in the same direction is applied, this results in a support for the inward/outward movement. This means that the rotation damper 10 can be also used as an actuator in order to actively position vertical forces on the wheel carrier and thus to assume functions of an active chassis.
A design of the construction of the rotational damper is shown in
As one can see from
Furthermore, as one can see from
As one can see from the sectional view illustration shown in
In the present case, the circumferential ring 14a is constructed from a different material than the material of the flywheel 14, so that the material of the circumferential ring 14 has a higher density than the rest of the material of flywheel 14.
In the present case, the material is selected in such a way that the flywheel shaft has an inertia of approximately J=0.01 kgm2 considered in the direction of it axis of rotation, and of approximately J=0.005 kgm2 in both other directions.
With respect to the issue of the materials of the flywheel shaft 14, it is important to ensure that a very high density of the ring 14a will be achieved. Embodiments made of tungsten or other materials having a density ρ−7,800 kg/m3 are conceivable.
The drive 22 of the flywheel 14 is in the present case designed as an electric motor, which has a stator that is fixedly connected to the first bearing element 16 and a rotor that is designed as flywheel 14 in the form of a hollow part.
Further, the flywheel 14 is formed with a rib structure. The rib structure has proven to be particularly advantageous because on the one hand, a weight-optimized construction is made possible in this manner, while on the other hand, cooling of the electric motor that is arranged in the interior is also ensured thanks to the ribs.
In addition, as one can see from
According to the illustrated embodiment, the second bearing element 18 is connected to the wheel carrier and/or to a control arm in such a way that a vertical movement of the wheel carrier results in a rotation of the second bearing element 18 about the second axis 18a. However, another possible embodiment would be to use the complete second bearing element 18 as a transverse or longitudinal control arm of a motor vehicle axle. This control arm would then have integrated damping characteristics.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2015 000 565 | Jan 2015 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2015/002499 | 12/12/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/112941 | 7/21/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3909044 | Henzel | Sep 1975 | A |
5628267 | Hoshio | May 1997 | A |
8919213 | Davis | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9597942 | Koch | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9731798 | Heyring | Aug 2017 | B2 |
20040244513 | Adams et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20140217663 | Willems | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150316123 | Dogel | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20190111982 | Gordner | Apr 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
647682 | Jul 1937 | DE |
102011101350 | Nov 2012 | DE |
102013015702 | Dec 2014 | DE |
0650890 | May 1995 | EP |
1346854 | Sep 2003 | EP |
2103471 | Sep 2009 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Notification of Transmittal of Translation of the International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 27, 2017, in connection with corresponding international application No. PCT/EP2015/002499 (7 pgs.). |
International Search Report with English translation and Written Opinion dated Mar. 14, 2016 of corresponding International Application No. PCT/EP2015/002499; 13 pgs. |
Examination Report dated Oct. 26, 2015 of corresponding German application No. 102015000565.0; 12 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180244121 A1 | Aug 2018 | US |