This is a U.S. national stage of application No. PCT/EP2004/051055, filed on 8 Jun. 2004 which claims priority on the following application: Country: Germany, Application No.: 103 29 510.0, Filed: 30 Jun. 2003.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a rotation rate sensor having a vibrational gyroscope which is part of at least one control loop which excites the vibrational gyroscope by supplying an excitation signal at its natural frequency, the vibrational gyroscope providing an output signal from which a noisy rotation rate signal is derived.
2. Description of the Prior Art
In rotation rate sensors having a vibrational gyroscope, the output signal which indicates the rotation rate and is caused by the Coriolis force is noisy, which adversely affects subsequent evaluation.
It is an object of the invention to purge the rotation rate signal of noise as far as possible.
The invention achieves this object by virtue of the noisy rotation rate signal being supplied to inputs on a low pass filter with a controllable bandwidth and on a bandpass filter, and by virtue of the output of the bandpass filter being connected to a control input on the low pass filter via a threshold value circuit. The bandpass filter ensures that the threshold value circuit responds only to changes in the rotation rate signal. In addition, the noise component at the input of the threshold value circuit is reduced by the bandpass filter connected upstream.
In the case of the inventive rotation rate sensor, the noise in the case of a constant or slowly altered rotation rate signal is largely suppressed by the low pass filter. If the rotation rate signal is changing more quickly, however, the band limit of the low pass filter is increased, which means that the fast change is also passed on, with a corresponding noise component being accepted in the short term.
Preferably, the inventive rotation rate sensor has provision for the threshold value circuit and the control input of the low pass filter to have a band selector arranged between them which follows a transition in the output signal from the threshold value circuit by producing a gradual transition in the signal which is supplied to the control input of the low pass filter. The transition time can be adjusted in both directions, i.e. from low band width for the low pass filter to high band width, and vice versa. This avoids interference in the rotation rate signal as a result of the low pass filter suddenly changing over.
In one advantageous requirement of the inventive rotation rate sensor, the bandpass filter lets through changes in the rotation rate signal which are faster than the changes let through by the low pass filter with a minimally set bandwidth and are at most as fast as the fastest changes caused by the rotation of the vibrational gyroscope. This ensures that the bandwidth of the low pass filter is increased when required, but that higher-frequency noise does not influence the control of the low pass filter.
So that the low pass filter is actuated appropriately both for positive and for negative changes in the rotation rate signal, another advantageous refinement provides for an output signal from the threshold value circuit to adopt a first level when the absolute value of the output signal from the bandpass filter is below a prescribed threshold, and also to adopt a second level.
The demands on the rotation rate sensor, for example the rotation rate measurement range or the signal-to-noise ratio, may vary from application to application.
Hence, in line with one development, the band limits of the bandpass filter and the threshold of the threshold value circuit are programmable. In this context, the limits of the adjustment range of the low pass filter and the transition time from the lowest to the highest limit and the transition time from the highest to the lowest bandwidth may also be programmable.
In the drawings:
Although the exemplary embodiment and parts thereof are shown as block diagrams, this does not mean that the inventive arrangement is limited to being implemented using individual circuits corresponding to the blocks. Rather, the inventive arrangement can be implemented particularly advantageously using large scale integrated circuits, e.g. digital signal processing. It is also possible to use microprocessors which, with suitable programming, perform the processing steps shown in the block diagrams.
The vibrational gyroscope 1 represents a high quality filter, with the section between the input 2 and the output 4 being part of a primary control loop 6 and the section between the input 3 and the output 5 being part of a secondary control loop 7. The primary control loop 6 is used to excite oscillations at the resonant frequency of the vibrational gyroscope, for example 14 kHz. In this case, the excitation is produced in an axis of the vibrational gyroscope with respect to which the direction of oscillation used for the secondary control loop is offset through 90°. In the secondary control loop 7, the signal SO is split into an inphase component and a quadrature component, one of which is supplied via a filter 8 to an output 9 from which a signal which is proportional to the rotation rate can be picked off.
In both control loops 6, 7, a fundamental part of the signal processing is performed digitally. The clock signals required for the signal processing are produced in a crystal-controlled digital frequency synthesizer 10 whose clock frequency is 14.5 MHz in the example shown. An explanation of further details is not given, since this is not necessary in order to understand the exemplary embodiment.
To improve understanding of the invention,
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
103 29 510 | Jun 2003 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2004/041055 | 6/8/2004 | WO | 00 | 12/13/2004 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/001384 | 1/6/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3902374 | Hoffman et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
4755057 | Curby et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4836675 | Hendow et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5187664 | Yardley et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5359413 | Chang et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
6497146 | Hobbs et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 307 321 | Aug 1991 | EP |
0 638 811 | Nov 2002 | EP |
06-322189 | Dec 1994 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060096374 A1 | May 2006 | US |