The disclosed and claimed concept relates generally to nuclear power generation equipment and, more particularly, to a rotation apparatus usable in conjunction with a control drum that is employed in a nuclear environment.
Numerous types of nuclear fission reactors are known in the relevant art. As a general matter, such nuclear reactors include a reactor vessel within which is situated an amount of fissile material and a number of control structures that control the reactivity of the nuclear fission reaction. In certain types of nuclear reactors, control rods are provided as the control structures. Such control rods are received by varying distances into the fissile material wherein the rods function as absorber devices that progressively reduce the reactivity of the fission reaction as the rods are received into the fissile material.
Another type of control structure is a control drum that is of an approximately cylindrical shape and which is situated on a pivotable shaft. The control drum includes a reflector portion and an absorber portion. The shaft is rotatable about an axis of rotation to cause the reflector portion to face toward a core of the nuclear environment in an operational state of the nuclear environment. The shaft is rotated about the axis of rotation to cause the absorber portion to face toward the core to result in a shutdown condition of the reactor. For instance, the reflector portion reflects neutrons back to the core in the operational state, and the reflector portion absorbs neutrons in the shutdown state. While control drums of this type have been generally effective for their intended purposes, they have not been without limitation.
Such control drums are typically rotated by stepper motors which require electrical power in order to operate. In a situation in which an emergency shutdown of the reactor is desired, an absence of electrical power to operate the stepper motors to move the control drums to the shutdown positions could potentially result in a catastrophic situation. Furthermore, in the event that the nuclear environment is capable of being physically transported from one location to another, it is desirable to ensure that the absorber portion of the control drum faces toward the core in order to avoid a possible unintended startup of the reactor. Such an unintended startup of the reactor potentially could occur if the reflector portion of the control drum were inadvertently repositioned to be fully or partially facing toward the core. While the stepper motors that control the control drums typically can maintain an orientation of the control drum such that the reflector portion faces away from the core, such control potentially can be lost if any such stepper motor loses electrical power, and the transporting of the nuclear environment from one location to another raises a significant potential of a loss of electrical power, Improvements thus would be desirable.
An improved rotation apparatus is usable with a control drum in a nuclear environment. The control drum is situated on a shaft that is rotatable about a horizontal axis of rotation, and the control drum includes an absorber portion and a reflector portion. The rotation apparatus includes a rotation mechanism that is structured to apply to the shaft in an operational position a force that biases the shaft to rotate toward a shutdown position, with the force being resisted by a motor to retain the shaft in the operational position when the motor is powered. The force is not resisted when the motor is unpowered. The rotation apparatus further includes a rotation management system that controls the rotation of the shaft.
Accordingly, an aspect of the disclosed and claimed concept is to provide a rotation apparatus that is operable in the event of an electrical power failure to move a control drum from an operational position to a shutdown position.
Another aspect of the disclosed and claimed concept is to provide such a rotation apparatus that rapidly moves the control drum to the shutdown position in the absence of electrical power.
Another aspect of the disclosed and claimed concept is to provide such a rotation apparatus that additionally can retain the control drum in the shutdown position when the nuclear environment is being transported from one location to another and in the absence of electrical power in such a situation.
Accordingly, an aspect of the disclosed and claimed concept is to provide an improved rotation apparatus usable with a control drum in a nuclear environment, the control drum having a shaft that is rotatable about an axis of rotation that is horizontal, a reflector portion situated on the shaft, an absorber portion situated on the shaft, and a motor which, when powered, is operable to move the shaft between an operational position wherein the reflector portion faces toward a core of the nuclear environment and a shutdown position wherein the absorber portion faces toward the core. The rotation apparatus can be generally stated as including a rotation mechanism which is structured to apply to the shaft in the operational position a force that is structured to rotate the shaft toward the shutdown position, the force being resisted by the motor to retain the shaft in the operational position when the motor is powered, the force not being resisted when the motor is unpowered, and a rotation management system that is structured to resist rotation of the shaft when the shaft is in the shutdown position.
Other aspects of the disclosed and claimed concept are provided by an improved rotation management system that is usable with a control drum in a nuclear environment, the control drum having a shaft that is rotatable about an axis of rotation that is horizontal, a reflector portion situated on the shaft, an absorber portion situated on the shaft, and a motor which, when powered, is operable to move the shaft between an operational position wherein the reflector portion faces toward a core of the nuclear environment and a shutdown position wherein the absorber portion faces toward the core. The rotation management system can be generally stated as including an actuator, a bolt that is situated on the actuator, and the actuator being operable to move the bolt between a first location engaged with the shaft in the shutdown position and a second location disengaged from the shaft, the bolt in the first position being structured to resist rotation of the shaft.
A further understanding of the disclosed and claimed concept can be gained from the following Description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
Similar numerals refer to similar parts throughout the specification.
An improved rotation apparatus 4 in accordance with a first embodiment of the disclosed and claimed concept is depicted in
As can be understood from
The stepper motor 24 is electrically operable to rotate the shaft 12 and the control drum 10 situated thereon between an operational position, such as is depicted generally in
The control drum apparatus 6 includes the aforementioned stepper motor 24 and further includes an encoder 27 that is connected with the stepper motor 24 or the shaft 12 and which outputs a series of pulses that are representative of rotational movement of the shaft 12 about the axis of rotation 20. The pulses are detected by a control system of the control drum apparatus 6 in order to continually ascertain the rotational position of the control drum 10 with respect to the core 22 and/or with respect to other structures.
In the depicted exemplary embodiment, the axis of rotation 20 is oriented along the horizontal direction, such as is indicated at the numeral 26. It is understood that the horizontal direction 26 is perpendicular to the vertical direction, such as is indicated at the numeral 28.
The rotation apparatus 4 can be said to include a rotation mechanism 30 and a rotation management system 32. As will be set forth in greater detail below, the rotation mechanism 30 applies a force to the shaft 12 in the operational position to bias the shaft toward the shutdown position. The force is resisted by the stepper motor 24 when the stepper motor 24 is energized. When the stepper motor 24 is de-energized, such as in the event of a failure of electrical power to the stepper motor 24, the force that is applied by the rotation mechanism 30 to the shaft 12 is no longer resisted by the stepper motor 24, and the force thus rotates the shaft 12 from the operational position of
As will beset forth in greater detail below, the rotation management system 32 can be said to include a rotation initiator 34, an eddy current brake 36, and a lock 38. As will likewise be set forth in greater detail below, the rotation initiator 34 initiates rotational movement of the shaft 12 away from the operational position that is depicted generally in
As can be understood from
The rotation initiator 34 thus provides an initial rotation of the shaft 12 away from the operational position of
In this regard, it can be said that the weight 40 is in a first position when the shaft 12 is in its operational position, as is depicted generally in
As can be understood from
It thus can be seen that the stepper motor 24, when energized, resists the bias of the mutual opposition of the permanent magnets 44 when the weight 40 is in the first position, and this retains the shaft 12 in the operational position. Should the stepper motor 24 become unpowered, however, the bias that is provided by the permanent magnets 44 initiates rotation of the shaft 12 to move the weight 40 from the first position toward the second position. As soon as the center of gravity 42 is offset along the horizontal direction 26 from the axis of rotation 20, gravity being applied to the weight 40 causes the shaft 12 to continue to rotate to the second position of the weight 40, which is the shutdown position of the shaft 12. As such, gravity acting on the weight 40 causes the shaft 12 to be rotated to the shutdown position in the absence of electrical power being applied to the stepper motor 24.
It is noted, however, that the need for a shutdown can sometimes be on an urgent basis, in which situation it would be desired to position the shaft 12 in the shutdown position of
More specifically, the eddy current brake 36 includes a pair of permanent magnets that are indicted at the numerals 54A and 54B, and which may be collectively or individually referred to herein with the numeral 54. The permanent magnets 54 each include a north pole 56 and a south pole 58, and the permanent magnets 54 are arranged on the support 14 such that one of the north poles 56 faces toward one of the south poles 58 whereby the permanent magnets 54 can be said to mutually attract one another. The eddy current brake 36 further includes a flywheel 60 that is situated on the shaft 12 and which rotates therewith. The flywheel 60 is formed of an electrically conductive material such as aluminum, copper, steel, or other appropriate material. The flywheel 60 has a number of notches 62 formed therein to form a number of radially-oriented fins 64 situated between the notches and a solid portion 66 that is free of notches 62. As employed herein, the expression “a number of” and variations thereof shall refer broadly to any non-zero quantity, including a quantity of one.
When the weight 40 is in the first position of
The braking of the shaft 12 by the rotationally-moving reception of the solid portion 66 between the permanent magnets 54 has the effect of slowing the rotation of the shaft 12 to enable the shaft 12 to be positioned such that the center of gravity 42 of the weight 40 is at its vertically lowest possible position. That is, the braking force that is applied to the solid portion 66 by the eddy current brake 36 is directly dependent upon the rotational velocity of the shaft 12 and of the solid portion 66 affixed thereto. As the rotational velocity of the shaft 12 is slowed, the magnetic braking force is correspondingly reduced, and the weight 40 is permitted to move to a position wherein the center of gravity 42 is situated vertically below the axis of rotation 20 without the weight 40 moving past such position and then oscillating back and forth with respect to such position until the weight 40 naturally reaches its lowest point. Rather, since the permanent magnets 54 slow the solid portion 66 by applying a magnetic braking force that is based upon the velocity of the solid portion 66, movement of the solid portion 66 is essentially slowed to the point that the effect of gravity on the weight 40 holds it so that the center of gravity 42 is at its lowest possible position without having moved past its lowest possible position. This rapidly moves the shaft 12 from its operational position to its shutdown position without oscillating back and forth around the shutdown position. This results in a rapid shutdown of the nuclear environment 8, which is desirable.
As further noted above, the rotation management system 32 additionally includes the lock 38 that is depicted generally in
The actuator 72 is electrically powered, but the bolt 68 does not move between the first and second locations unless the actuator 72 is energized. As such, when it is desired to place the shaft 12 in a locked configuration, the shaft 12 is rotated to its shutdown position, and the actuator 72 is energized to linearly move the bolt 68 from the second location of
It thus can be understood that the rotation apparatus 4 can cause the control drum apparatus 6 to rotate from the operational position to the shutdown position in the event of an electrical power loss to the stepper motor 24, Furthermore, the lock 38 retains the shaft 12 in the locked position of
An improved control drum apparatus 106 is depicted in
More specifically, the rotation mechanism 130 includes a spring 133 that extends between the support 114 and the shaft 112 and which, in the operational position of
The rotation apparatus 104 additionally includes an eddy current brake 136 that is cooperable with a flywheel 160 in order to slow the rotational velocity of the shaft 112 when a solid portion 166 of the flywheel 160 is being received between a pair of permanent magnets 154 of the eddy current brake 136, which is when the shaft 112 is beginning to reach the shutdown position.
In the depicted exemplary embodiment, the spring 133 is elastically in a free and undeflected state in the shutdown position of
It is understood, however, that in alternative embodiments the rotation mechanism 130 or the rotation management system 132 or both can include a radially projected structure situated on the shaft 112 and a fixed stop situated on a support 114, by way of example. With such a geometry, the spring 133 can be configured such that it remains in an elastically deformed position even in the shutdown position of the shaft 112 and thus would bias the radially projecting structure against the fixed stop in order to retain the shaft 112 in the shutdown position of
The rotation management system 132 further includes a lock 138 that includes an actuator 172, a bolt 168, and a receptacle 170. More specifically, the actuator is in the form of a linear stepper motor 176 that is situated on a first bracket 172 of the support 114, a rotatable seat 180 that is situated on a second bracket 178 of the support 114, and a threaded shaft 182 that extends between the stepper motor 176 and the rotatable seat 180. The threaded shaft includes a threaded collar 184 that is threadably situated thereon and to which the bolt 168 is affixed.
When the stepper motor 176 is electrically energized, it rotates the threaded shaft 182 which causes the threaded collar 184 to non-rotationally translate along the threaded shaft 182 between the first and second brackets 174 and 178 while carrying the bolt 168 therewith, That is, when the threaded shaft 182 rotates, the threaded collar 184 does not rotate therewith, and rather the threaded collar 184 non-rotationally translates along the threaded shaft 182, As such, the actuator 172 is electrically operated to move the bolt 168 between a first location, such as is depicted generally in
Since the actuator 172 ceases movement if it is electrically unpowered, the actuator 172 can be unpowered in the locked position of the lock 138, such as during transport of the nuclear environment 108 in which the control drum 106 is situated, while still retaining the shaft 112 in the shutdown position regardless of the presence or absence of electrical energy to the actuator 172. This advantageously retains the shaft 112 in the shutdown position and thereby avoids an unintended startup of the nuclear environment 108. Furthermore, the rotation mechanism 130 and the rotation management system 132 will rotate the shaft 112 from the operational position to the shutdown position in a very short time in the situation where the stepper motor 124 becomes electrically unpowered. This permits a rapid shutdown of the nuclear environment 108 in which the control drum 160 is situated.
It is understood that any of the teachings contained herein with respect to the rotation apparatus 104 can be implemented into the rotation apparatus 4 without departing from the spirit of the instant disclosure. In this regard, any of the teachings may be combined in any fashion to result in advantageous rotation apparatuses that are within the scope of the instant disclosure. Other variations will be apparent.
While specific embodiments of the invention have been described in detail, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various modifications and alternatives to those details could be developed in light of the overall teachings of the disclosure. Accordingly, the particular embodiments disclosed are meant to be illustrative only and not limiting as to the scope of the invention which is to be given the full breadth of the appended claims and any and all equivalents thereof.
This application is a continuation application claiming priority under 35 U.S.C. § 120 to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/830,632, entitled “Rotational Apparatus Usable With Control Drum Apparatus In Nuclear Environment”, filed Apr. 20, 2017, now U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2019/0172594, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2452820 | Winther | Nov 1948 | A |
2964661 | Sutherland | Dec 1960 | A |
2985431 | Sutherland | May 1961 | A |
3135898 | Manganelii, Jr. | Jun 1964 | A |
3141383 | Abild | Jul 1964 | A |
3161014 | Abild | Dec 1964 | A |
3164526 | Girard | Jan 1965 | A |
3296083 | Haake et al. | Jan 1967 | A |
3429203 | Bass | Feb 1969 | A |
3476963 | Feldhoff | Nov 1969 | A |
3785923 | Bratoljic | Jan 1974 | A |
3822390 | Janson | Jul 1974 | A |
4085004 | Fletcher | Apr 1978 | A |
4219384 | Cramer | Aug 1980 | A |
5051638 | Pyles | Sep 1991 | A |
5410578 | Walton | Apr 1995 | A |
5415140 | Rigazzi | May 1995 | A |
5793826 | Sato | Aug 1998 | A |
9656643 | Yamaguchi | May 2017 | B2 |
10229757 | Filippone | Mar 2019 | B2 |
20070000741 | Pribonic | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080105503 | Pribonic | May 2008 | A1 |
20100316177 | Stambaugh | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20160049210 | Filippone | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
107004447 | Aug 2017 | CN |
942581 | Nov 1963 | DE |
1212792 | Mar 1966 | DE |
806607 | Dec 1958 | GB |
04320993 | Nov 1982 | JP |
04320993 | Nov 1992 | JP |
10026685 | Jan 1998 | JP |
101502700 | Mar 2015 | KR |
101502700 | Mar 2015 | KR |
WO-2007055645 | May 2007 | WO |
WO-2009036666 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2019147317 | Aug 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/058618, dated Aug. 23, 2019. |
Supplementary Partial European Search Report for corresponding European Patent Application No. EP18902377.3 dated Jul. 28, 2021. |
Supplementary European Search Report for corresponding European Patent Application No. EP18902377.3 dated Mar. 10, 2022. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200395134 A1 | Dec 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15830632 | Dec 2017 | US |
Child | 17005457 | US |