Not Applicable
1. Technical Field
This invention relates in general to hospital equipment and, more particularly, to an operating table.
2. Description of the Related Art
Throughout a surgical procedure, there may be a need to switch a patient between supine and prone positions (and vice versa) on an operating table. The rotation of the patient wastes a considerable amount of time on behalf of the surgeon and his team, as well as medical facility staff who are involved in assembling and utilizing the in-house turn team needed to transfer the position of any given patient from the initial supine position to the desired prone position. At the end of the surgical procedure, the patient must be returned to the supine position for transport from the surgical area to the recovery area.
With existing equipment, there is recurring impending risk of injury to various members of the turn team and to the patient, especially obese patients—an issue which is increasing annually in the United States and in most developed countries. Standard operating bed platforms are too narrow to accommodate obese patients, and many bed platforms are not manufactured with a sturdy base that remains stable enough to hold very obese patients during the “turning process”.
The number of personnel needed in the operating room to accomplish the patient rotation increases the constant threat of patient contamination and, further, potentially compromises the sterilization of onsite instrumentation. The invasive presence of multiple people breathing heavily and possibly coughing from straining while manipulating the patient creates a scenario for increased airborne microorganism contamination/infection.
Therefore, a need has arisen for an operating table that would decrease the number of individuals needed in the operating room while safely and effectively rotating a patient.
In the present invention, an operating table comprises a first bed platform and a second bed platform. The first and second platforms are rotated to aid in positioning a patient from a first position on one of the platforms to a second position on the other of the platforms.
The present invention provides significant advantages over the prior art. The rotation of the first and second bed platforms allows a patient to be safely and quickly turned with a minimum amount of human effort, despite the weight of a patient. The patient's weight may be maintained above the base of the table throughout the turning procedure, minimizing the chance that the table could overturn. The operating table can save significant money over time because of the considerable reduction in wasted time of operating room personnel, reduction of staff needed for turning patients, and lower liability insurance in the operating room. Further, the safety of the patient during the turn in considerably increased.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
a through 2h illustrate operation of the operating table of
a through 4i illustrate turning a patient using the table of
a through 5b illustrate a third embodiment of a rotational operating table;
a through 6g illustrate turning a patient using the table of
a illustrates a perspective view of a fourth embodiment of a rotational operating table;
b through 7e illustrate turning a patient using the table of
The present invention is best understood in relation to
Bed platforms 14 are pivotably attached to rods 20 (for example, 0.5 inch steel rods) positioned through the length of the outside and inside edges of each bed platform 14 at both edges of each bed platform 14. The rods 20 are fed through ball bearings (not shown) within the bed platforms 14 so that the rod can easily rotate within the bed platforms 14. The rods 20 at the outside edges of the bed platforms are coupled to a first end of telescoping and rotating arms 22 positioned at either end of the OR table 10. The second end of each arm 22 is coupled to a respective vertical track 24. The rods at the inside edges of the bed platforms 14 are coupled to wheels (not shown) which can be moved by track elevators 26 between upper horizontal tracks 28 and lower horizontal tracks 26 at the front and back of the table 10. The wheels travel horizontally along one of these tracks. A portable control panel 32 provides a display, such as a LCD screen, for table feedback and troubleshooting. Straps 34 hold the patient to a bed platform 14 during transfers.
In operation, the mechanical telescoping arms 22 can move to position the bed platforms 14 to desired positions and angles. The arms 22 are connected to motors located inside the table casing. The arms 22 can move up and down on vertical tracks 24 and can rotate about the connection point within a vertical plane. At the opposite side of the bed platforms 14, the track elevators allow the bed platform to move along either one of two horizontal tracks, upper horizontal track 28 or lower horizontal track 30. Both bed platforms could be in the same horizontal track, or in different horizontal tracks, depending upon the configuration. Having both bed platforms 14 in the same track provides for a flat bed platform configuration (a double width bed platform using both bed platforms 14a and 14b), while bed platforms 14 in different tracks allows the bed platforms 14 to be stacked on top of one anther. An angled configuration, as shown, can be provided with the bed platforms on the same horizontal track or in different horizontal tracks.
The track elevators 26 move the inside rods 20 of bed platforms 14 between tracks 28 and 30. The track elevators are located, for example, in the center of the tracks 28 and 30. When the arms 22 pull the bed platforms apart for rotation, the wheels (not shown) coupling the bed platforms to the tracks 28 and/or 30 move along the track to the center where the track elevators 26 are located. When a wheel moves into the elevator, it is secured, for example by a spring-loaded latch. Once in position, it can be raised or lowered to the complementary track 28 or 30.
a-2g illustrate the operation of table 10 to rotate a patient from a supine position to a prone position (or vice versa). In
In
In
The procedures set forth in
A second embodiment of an operating table is shown in
Each lever arm 42 includes a TLT (table-lock-turn) wheel 48 comprising two gears 50 and a carriage 52. The two gears 50 ride on respective tracks. The carriage 52 is located between the two gears 50 of each lever arm 42. The carriage 52 can freely rotate. A motor 54 at the bottom of the lever arm 42 provides rotational motion to the lever arm 42 to position the carriage 52 at any point along a respective track 56 engaging the gears. Each lever arm 42 automatically retracts to maintain contact with the tracks as the lever arm moves.
The jacks 46 have wheels 58 at their tops. The bed platforms 44 roll along the wheels 58 on the tops of the jacks 46 in response to movement of the lever arms 42. The bed platform jacks 46 are arranged in two rows, the height of the jacks of each row being separately controllable, such that the jacks 46 can apply a tilt to the bed platforms 44, as shown below.
The operation of the operating table 40 during a patient flipping procedure is shown in
In the second step shown in
In the third step shown in
In the fourth step shown in
In the fifth step shown in
In the sixth step shown in
In the seventh step shown in
In the eighth step shown in
In the ninth step shown in
The steps shown in
a illustrates a perspective view of a third embodiment of a rotation operating table 70. Operating table 70 has first and second bed platforms 72 (individually referenced as bed platforms 72a and 72b), which are rotated by arms 74 and jacks 76 disposed in housing 78. Two pairs of arms 74 (located at each end of the table housing 78 through opening 80) include an outside arm 74a (positioned closer to the front or back of the table 70) and an inside arm 74b (positioned closer to the center of the table 70). The arms 74 are shown in greater detail in
Jacks 76 move vertically up and down and the bed platforms 72 slide on the tops of the jacks 76 (the top of the jack may include a rotating wheel or ball to facilitate sliding). Slots 84 are formed in the bed platforms 72 such that the jacks 76 do not impede the positioning of the bed platform (for example, as shown in
a through 6g illustrate the operation of the operating table 70 of
In
In
In an alternative embodiment, the arms 74a and 74b could be permanently attached to respective bed platforms 72a and 72b, with the arms capable of switching front and back positions with in the housing.
In order to maintain the stability of the bed platform 72 during the switching of the arms, on set of arms (i.e., the front set of arms 74a and 74b) are switched first and the other set of arms (i.e., the back set of arms 74a and 74b) are switched second. This may help prevent the bed platforms 72 from rotating during the switch.
In
In
The embodiments shown in
It is estimated the average turn time for the normal patient by a typical turn team (4 to 6 staff members, depending on the patient's weight) from the moment of decision by the surgeon until the patient is successfully turned, redraped, and all instrumentation repositioned is optimally 23 minutes. Extremely obese patients may take considerably longer. It is estimated that utilizing the table shown and described platform herein will cut the time factor by at least 50 percent, to an average turn time of 12-15 minutes. This translates to a gain of at least 20 minutes with each surgical team per day—more if additional turns are needed during any given surgical procedure. Thus, the time saved will allow for at least one additional operating procedure to be scheduled and performed each day, resulting in enhanced efficiency and increased revenue for physicians, caregivers, and hospitals.
The invention is also important in reducing injuries to the turn team. The nurses, operating technicians, and ancillary personnel often suffer knee, hip, and back injuries from the tugging/lifting maneuvers necessary in the rotation of very obese patients. Worse than that are the injuries sustained by patients who are either dropped, partially dropped or compromised throughout the turning process because they are tethered to hoses, anesthesia devices, and monitors that must be maintained throughout the turning process.
A general consensus exists that these injuries to both staff and patient are not consistently recorded, documented or reported, and the incidence is, in reality, much higher than recorded by most medical facilities. The present invention reduces the risk of injury to staff and patient, and thus reduces the overall liability of the hospital.
A third embodiment is shown in
a-b illustrates a table 90 with the two separately controllable bed platforms, a primary bed platform 92a and alternate bed platform 92b. Each bed platform can rotate approximately 120 degrees from a horizontal position. Stabilizing legs provide a stable supply support at the floor.
By activating a “replacement table lifting button” the bed platform of table will rise to an appropriate position. By activating a “lateral shift button”, the patient is slowly moved to side of bed platform (on the primary bed platform 92a) and rests safely in the temporary position stage.
By activating a “secondary/replacement bed platform” button, the alternate bed platform 92b rises from its stored position in a lower portion of the table to an extended position (as shown in
A “patient rotation button” is activated to permit the primary bed platform 92a to slowly lift and rotate the patient from supine to prone-roll position, as shown in
In
Although the Detailed Description of the invention has been directed to certain exemplary embodiments, various modifications of these embodiments, as well as alternative embodiments, will be suggested to those skilled in the art. The invention encompasses any modifications or alternative embodiments that fall within the scope of the Claims.
This application claims the benefit of the filing date of copending provisional applications U.S. Ser. No. 60/756,432, filed Jan. 5, 2006, entitled “ROTATIONAL OPERATING TABLE”, U.S. Ser. No. 60/774,940, filed Feb. 17, 2006, entitled “ROTATIONAL OPERATING TABLE” and U.S. Ser. No. 60/807,544, filed Jul. 17, 2006, entitled “ROTATIONAL OPERATING TABLE”, which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
554580 | Conkwright | Feb 1896 | A |
2223405 | Cain | Dec 1940 | A |
2522018 | Blackman | Sep 1950 | A |
2613371 | Keyes | Oct 1952 | A |
3099020 | Garfield | Jul 1963 | A |
3302218 | Stryker | Feb 1967 | A |
3302219 | Harris | Feb 1967 | A |
3609357 | Jones | Sep 1971 | A |
3827089 | Grow | Aug 1974 | A |
3875598 | Foster et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3924281 | Gibbs | Dec 1975 | A |
3988790 | Mracek | Nov 1976 | A |
4011609 | Bethlen | Mar 1977 | A |
4084274 | Willis | Apr 1978 | A |
4109329 | Tupper | Aug 1978 | A |
4222132 | Crim | Sep 1980 | A |
4244358 | Pyers | Jan 1981 | A |
4274168 | Depowski | Jun 1981 | A |
4356577 | Taylor | Nov 1982 | A |
4357722 | Thomson | Nov 1982 | A |
4658451 | Taniguchi | Apr 1987 | A |
4776047 | DiMatteo | Oct 1988 | A |
4873732 | Perez | Oct 1989 | A |
4937901 | Brennan | Jul 1990 | A |
4939801 | Schaal | Jul 1990 | A |
5022810 | Sherrow | Jun 1991 | A |
5088706 | Jackson | Feb 1992 | A |
5101519 | Yamamoto | Apr 1992 | A |
5103511 | Sequin | Apr 1992 | A |
5131106 | Jackson | Jul 1992 | A |
5224228 | Larrimore | Jul 1993 | A |
5418990 | Risasen | May 1995 | A |
5479665 | Cassidy | Jan 1996 | A |
5628078 | Pennington | May 1997 | A |
5640729 | Marino | Jun 1997 | A |
5659905 | Palmer et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5826286 | Cranston | Oct 1998 | A |
5996144 | Hodgetts | Dec 1999 | A |
6038717 | Persson | Mar 2000 | A |
6112349 | Connolly | Sep 2000 | A |
6131215 | Lindell | Oct 2000 | A |
6230342 | Haugs | May 2001 | B1 |
6282736 | Hand | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6282737 | Vrzalik | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6427263 | Lindell | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6526610 | Hand | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6668396 | Wei | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6701553 | Hand | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6862761 | Hand | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6874182 | L'Hegarat | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6966081 | Sharps | Nov 2005 | B1 |
20060016007 | Hornbach | Jan 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080222811 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60756432 | Jan 2006 | US | |
60774940 | Feb 2006 | US | |
60807544 | Jul 2006 | US |