This invention generally relates to vacuum assisted resin transfer molding, and deals more particularly with a method and apparatus for reducing thickness gradients in molded composite parts caused by gravity-induced settling of the resin during curing.
Vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) is being used more frequently to mold large composite structures, such as sections of aircraft. VARTM is a variant of traditional resin transfer molding (RTM), possessing advantages over conventional RTM by eliminating matched-metal tooling costs, reducing volatile emissions and allowing for low injection pressures. In VARTM, vacuum pressure is used to force liquid resin into dry composite reinforcements that have been laid in a sealed mold, often in the form of a preform. The mold can be a one sided tool with a vacuum bag, a two sided matched tool with a vacuum seal, or a soft bag enclosing the entire structure to be molded. Vacuum pressure is used to pull or drive resin into the mold, thus VARTM is sometimes referred to as a vacuum infusion process. The selection of materials, arrangement of mold gates/vents and the selection of processing parameters often have a significant impact on product quality and process efficiency in VARTM.
When molding relatively large structures, such as an aircraft fuselage, gravitational effects on resin flow behavior can create undesirable thickness gradients in the finished structure. These gradients, which may approach 25% or more, result from the fact that the force imposed by gravity tends to draw the flowing resin downwardly toward the bottom of the molded structure during the curing process, until the resin is sufficiently cured to terminate its flow. As a result, wall thickness of the structure measured in bottom portions of the structure can be significantly greater than wall thickness near the top of the structure. Thickness gradients due to resin migration not only reduce the integrity of the molded structure, but also result in a structure that is unnecessarily heavy, since in order to achieve a minimum wall thickness at the top of the structure, wall thickness near the bottom of the structure is greater than necessary. In the case of aircraft structures, thickness gradients of the type described above make it difficult to produce complete fuselage sections having integral stringers and co-bonded fuselage frames.
Accordingly, there is a need in the art for an improved method and apparatus for manufacturing composite structures using VARTM which overcomes the deficiencies of the prior art discussed above. The present invention is directed to satisfying this need.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, a composite fiber structure is formed by injecting resin into composite fiber layup, and rotating the resin injected layup to reduce gravity-induced migration of the resin through the layup. The thickness of the structure preferably has a vertical gradient less than about 10%. Rotation of the layup is commenced when resin injection begins, and is continued until the structure is cured sufficiently to terminate resin flow.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a method is provided for manufacturing a composite structure exhibiting reduced resin thickness gradient caused by gravity. The method comprises steps of: placing a composite fiber layup on a forming tool; introducing resin into the layup; applying a vacuum to the layup while the resin is being introduced; and, rotating the tool as the resin is introduced into the layup in order to reduce settling of the resin. The layup is formed by placing a dry preform on a female mandrel, and resin is introduced into the layup through a main support tube which mounts the tool for rotation on a pair of supports. The main support tube is also used to draw a vacuum on the structure in order to infuse the resin into the layup.
According to still another aspect of the invention, apparatus is provided for producing a composite fiber structure comprising a forming tool having the shape of the structure and upon which a laminate layup may be disposed. A mounting assembly is provided for mounting the tool for rotation about a central axis of rotation. An air tight flexible membrane covers the layup and a resin injection system is provided for injecting resin through the membrane into the layup. A vacuum system produces a vacuum within the membrane and urges the resin to pass through composite fibers forming the layup. A motor rotates the tool about the central axis of rotation at a rate which reduces gravity induced settling of the resin in the layup during curing.
Various additional objects, features and advantages of the present invention can be more fully appreciated with reference to the detailed description and accompanying drawings that follow.
Referring first to
The fuselage 10, or similar large composite structure, is manufactured using the apparatus shown in
The main support tube 26 is hollow, providing a passageway throughout its length to convey fluids. The input end 34 of the tube 26 is coupled with a suitable source (not shown) of resin. The exit end 40 of the main tube 26 is connected with a suitable source (not shown) for creating negative pressure, typically less than one atmosphere.
A composite layup, preferably in the form of a skin preform 32 is installed on the inner-mandrel surface of the tool 18. The preform 32 may comprise multiple layers of matting formed of composite fibers; the composition, thickness and the number of layers will depend on the particular application. Generally L-shaped frame members 12 are next installed within the tool 18. Frame members 12 may comprise pre-cured, composite components which are held in place and located by series of frame locator tools 28 that are secured to the interior face of the tool 18. A pair of L-shaped support clips 42, also formed of pre-cured composite material are installed on opposite sides of each of the frame members 12, in contact with the inside face of the skin preform 32. An air tight, flexible membrane in the form of a vacuum bag 44 is disposed over the assembly comprising the skin preform 32, clips 42 and frame members 12. Bag seals 50 are provided where necessary, to provide an air tight seal between the bag 44 and frame members 12.
As shown in
The vacuum created within bag 44 evacuates air from the bag, and the residual negative pressure forces the flowing resin to be infused into the layers of the skin preform 32. Excess resin is carried through the vacuum tubes 38 to the main support tube 34 and thence through the exit end 40 of the tube 26. The vacuum source then draws air through the exit 40, evacuating air from the bag 44 and creating internal negative pressure which draws resin into the main tube at the entrance 34. The resin flows through the main tube 26 into the resin injection tubes 30, entering the bag 40 and flowing over the surface of the entire layup. The negative pressure within the bag 44 causes the resin to be infused into the layup. Excess resin is carried away by the vacuum tubes 38 through the exit 40 of the main tube 26.
As resin begins to enter the main tube 26, first motor 60 and second motor 62 are turned on, causing the entire tool 18, and thus the layup, to rotate. The rate of rotation will depend upon the size of the tool 18, the composition of the resin as well as the layup. However the rotational rate should be chosen such that the tendency of the resin to settle due to gravity is offset or neutralized as a result of the layup being periodically inverted. In other wards, the forces imposed by gravity on the layup and the resin are periodically inverted such that the resultant vertical force acting on the resin over a period of time is zero. As a result of this rotational technique, gravity induced sagging or settling of the resin is materially reduced, resulting in thickness gradients less than 10% throughout the entire structure.
Rotation of the tool 18 is continued through the entire cure cycle, or at least until the resin has hardened sufficiently to preclude settling. After curing, the tool 18 is removed and the formed composite structure is removed from the tool 18. The resulting structure, in this case a fuselage section, has integral stringers and co-bonded fuselage frames forming a substantially unitized structure wherein the skin and other components have an essentially uniform thickness throughout the structure.
Thickness gradients in large, cobonded composite structures resulting from gravity-induced resin migration during curing is substantially reduced by rotating the structure during the resin infusion and curing stages. The layup for the structure is placed on a rotatable tool fixture and vacuum bagged. The tool fixture is mounted on a central support tube provided with motors for rotating the tool fixture about the axis of the tube. The tube has internal passageways that deliver resin to the bagged layup and carry away excess resin from the layup using vacuum pressure. The resulting composite structures exhibit thickness gradients less than 10%.
Although this invention has been described with respect to certain exemplary embodiments, it is to be understood that the specific embodiments are for purposes of illustration and not limitation, as other variations will occur to those of skill in the art.
This application is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 11/304,286, filed Dec. 15, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,652,388.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2633605 | Brucker | Apr 1953 | A |
2999780 | Perrault | Sep 1961 | A |
3622824 | Atlee | Nov 1971 | A |
3635612 | Fortin | Jan 1972 | A |
3787141 | Walsh | Jan 1974 | A |
3791783 | Damon | Feb 1974 | A |
3924096 | Yanakieva et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3975069 | DeLucia | Aug 1976 | A |
4040359 | Blajda et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4043721 | Lemelson | Aug 1977 | A |
4071641 | Susai | Jan 1978 | A |
4120924 | Rainville | Oct 1978 | A |
4123307 | Lemelson | Oct 1978 | A |
4315776 | Pitler | Feb 1982 | A |
4576776 | Anderson | Mar 1986 | A |
4865787 | Vallance | Sep 1989 | A |
4940940 | Leroux | Jul 1990 | A |
4956135 | Payne | Sep 1990 | A |
4970927 | Benuzzi | Nov 1990 | A |
5005786 | Okamoto et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5135596 | Pabsch | Aug 1992 | A |
5178316 | Block | Jan 1993 | A |
5208051 | Berg | May 1993 | A |
5221390 | Persson et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5221391 | Kittaka | Jun 1993 | A |
5247563 | Block et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5257493 | Cocchi et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5259901 | Davis | Nov 1993 | A |
5357180 | Speicher | Oct 1994 | A |
5393215 | Donovan, Sr. | Feb 1995 | A |
5530733 | Eggleston et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5547410 | Eggleston et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5577093 | Benz et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5714104 | Bailey et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5810562 | Byrnes et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6406580 | Campbell, Jr. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6433451 | Cherciu | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440252 | Biegelsen et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6495088 | Coffin | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6517618 | Foucher et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6524173 | Nelson | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6549327 | Foucher et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6640451 | Vinarcik | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6793754 | Shieh | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6846377 | Biegelsen et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6958105 | Herrmann | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7052567 | Blackmore | May 2006 | B1 |
7678317 | Khouri et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7722348 | Quenneville | May 2010 | B1 |
7726962 | Aramburu | Jun 2010 | B2 |
20020185216 | Biegelsen et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020186450 | Foucher et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020189749 | Shieh | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002132 | Foucher et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030077965 | Mack | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030102604 | Mack | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030227108 | Okerson | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040113305 | Geyer | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050039844 | Engwall | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050103431 | Khouri et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050233129 | Capoccello | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060027314 | Jones | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070141334 | Kulesha | Jun 2007 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Brittles, “New Developments in Resin Transfer Moulding,” Proc. 19th International Composites Congress, Nov. 1994, pp. 11-26. |
Zhang, “The Effects of Physical Composite Particle Parameters on the Efficacy of a Proprietary Sound-Attenuation Technology and Its Application to Advanced Structural Composites,” Final Technical Report Grant# N00014-00-1-0548, Mar. 28, 2003, 6 pages. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 17, 2009, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/304,286, 9 pages. |
Final Office Action, dated Oct. 8, 2009, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/304,286, 9 pages. |
Office Action, dated Nov. 8, 2010, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/304,286, 8 pages. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 15, 2011, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/304,286, 8 pages. |
Final Office Action, dated Aug. 18, 2011, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/304,286, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 8, 2013, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 11/304,286, 15 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140141114 A1 | May 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11304286 | Dec 2005 | US |
Child | 14165570 | US |