Rotationally balancing a rotating part

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8701286
  • Patent Number
    8,701,286
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, May 24, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 22, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
A method is provided of rotationally balancing a rotating part. A rotor hub or ring and a plurality of rotor blades for assembly onto the hub or ring are provided, each blade having an unfilled internal cavity. The respective masses and moment weights of the blades with filled internal cavities are then predicted. Next, the rotor blades are assembled onto the hub or ring to form the rotating part. The relative positions of the assembled blades are determined on the basis of their predicted masses and moment weights with filled internal cavities. The internal cavities of the assembled rotor blades are then filled.
Description

The present invention relates to a method of rotationally balancing a rotating part.


Components that rotate at high speed must be balanced if undesirable vibration and associated stresses are to be avoided or reduced. This is particularly the case for rotors of gas turbine engines.


Bladed discs are commonly assembled by fitting removable and replaceable blades to a central rotor disc. It is then possible to balance the assembled discs by using the mass variation between individual blades, so that the positions of individual blades can be changed to eliminate any out-of-balance that occurs.


However, with integral bladed discs (known as “blisks”) and with integral bladed rings (known as “blings”), it is not possible to exchange individual blades, is and so a different balancing method is required.


A rotating out-of-balance can take two forms. The first is static unbalance in which the centre of mass lies away from the rotational axis so that, if the rotor is supported in a frictionless manner, it will always come to rest in a position in which the centre of mass lies directly below the axis. A known method of correcting static unbalance is either to add an appropriate mass to the rotor at a position diametrically opposite the detected centre of mass, or to remove material from the same side of the axis as the centre of mass. The effect of such adjustments is to move the centre of mass to the rotational axis.


The second kind of rotating out-of-balance is dynamic unbalance which arises if out-of-balance forces are generated in different directions at different positions along the rotational axis of the rotor. Such forces give rise to a rotating couple unbalance when the rotor is rotated, and this can cause problems even if the rotor is in static balance. The rotating couple unbalance can be determined from the “moment weights” of the blades (blade moment weight=blade mass×distance from rotation axis). As with static unbalance, it is known to correct couple unbalance by the addition or removal of material from the rotor.


However, in both cases correcting unbalance involves a weight penalty, either from the direct effect of adding a balancing mass, or because the removal of material means that balancing lands need to be provided from which controlled material removal can be effected, and these balancing lands add to the weight of the component as a whole. Nonetheless, with hollow-bladed blisks or blings any necessary balancing adjustments are generally relatively small as the relatively low mass of the hollow blades tends to avoid significant out-of-balance problems, and thus the weight penalty may not be too onerous.


A problem can arise, however, if the mass of the blades is increased. In this case, out-of-balance problems can be more significant, and the weight penalty can be greater.


The present invention is at least partly based on the realisation that a rotating part with heavier blades can benefit from an alternative approach to rotational balancing.


Accordingly, the present invention provides a method of rotationally balancing a rotating part, the method comprising the steps of:


providing a rotor hub or ring and a plurality of rotor blades for assembly onto the hub or ring, each blade having an unfilled internal cavity;


predicting the respective masses and moment weights of the blades with filled internal cavities;


assembling the rotor blades onto the hub or ring to form the rotating part, the relative positions of the assembled blades being determined on the basis of their predicted masses and moment weights with filled internal cavities; and


filling the internal cavities of the assembled rotor blades.


Advantageously, by determining the relative positions of the blades on the hub or ring using the predicted masses and moment weights, the resulting rotating part may be substantially balanced after the assembly and filling steps. It may then be possible to reduce the number and/or size of balancing lands, or avoid providing balancing lands at all. This can lead to weight and cost savings. Further, the pre-assembly predicting step can take less time and/or be less costly than conventional post-assembly balancing operations.


The methods may have any one or, to the extent that they are compatible, any combination of the following optional features.


The rotating part may be a blisk, the rotor blades being assembled onto a rotor hub in the form of a disk to form the blisk. Alternatively, the rotating part may be a bling, the rotor blades being assembled onto a rotor ring to form the bling. The blisk or bling can be for use in a gas turbine engine. Other possible rotating parts to which the method may be applied are: a helicopter rotor hub and blades, a wind turbine rotor hub and blades, a turbo-prop rotor hub and propeller blades, and a ship rotor hub and propeller blades.


Typically, the methods further comprise the step, between the providing and predicting steps, of determining (e.g. measuring) the masses and moment weights of the blades with unfilled internal cavities and the respective volumes of their internal cavities, the subsequent prediction of the respective masses and moment weights of the blades with filled internal cavities being based on the determined masses, moment weights and volumes.


The volumes of the internal cavities of the blades can be conveniently determined by gas pressure analysis, CT (Computerised, typically X-ray, Tomography) scanning or ultrasonic CMM (Coordinate Measuring Machine) inspection.


The shapes (i.e. the geometries) of the internal cavities of the blades may already be known with sufficient accuracy to allow the moment weights of the filled blades to be predicted without specifically determining the internal cavity shapes. However, the determining step may also include determining the respective shapes of the internal cavities. The respective masses and moment weights of the blades with filled internal cavities can then be predicted on the basis of the determined masses, moment weights, volumes and shapes. For example, the shapes of the internal cavities can be determined by CT scanning or ultrasonic CMM inspection. This is particularly convenient if CT scanning or ultrasonic CMM inspection is anyway used to determine the volumes of the internal cavities of the blades.


Blisks and Wings in particular can be susceptible to vibration as the natural damping of the dovetail attachment, of e.g. a conventional removable and replaceable compressor blade, is not present. Thus, advantageously, the internal cavities can be filled with vibration damping material. For example, the vibration damping material can be a viscoelastic damping material. However, other rotating parts to which the method can be applied may also benefit from having the internal cavities being filled with vibration damping material.





Embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawing in which:



FIG. 1 is a flow chart which illustrates stages in the manufacture of a blisk.





Hollow aerofoils are commonly used on civil fan blades, and may in future be used as the blades of compressor section blisks. Typically the blade cavity is formed during the manufacturing process of the blade by vacuum drawing. A rigid internal metallic structure may be included in the cavity to increase strength and stiffness, and stop the panels “panting”.


In order to increase damping, and hence reduce vibration on fan blades, a concept has been demonstrated where the hollow cavity of a fan blade is filled with damping material. For example, GB2450937 discloses a fan blade having a cavity into which is introduced a viscoelastic filler to adjust the frequency response of the blade.


Blisks and blings can be particularly susceptible to vibration as the natural damping of the dovetail attachment, of e.g. a conventional removable and replaceable compressor blade, is not present. Thus it can be beneficial to extend the viscoelastic filler damping concept to the hollow blades of blisks and blings.


However, when blades are assembled (e.g. welded) onto a disc/ring to form a blisk/bling, their radial position can vary, which can have an effect on the rotational balance of the blisk/bling. This is not generally a significant problem for unfilled blisks/blings as typically the majority of the space occupied by each blade is cavity, and a small change in radial position has a little effect on balance. On the other hand, with viscoelastically damped filled blades, the out of balance generated from a change in blade radial position can be greater, as the blades will have an increased mass from the subsequent filling process, the position of the filled mass being at a significant radial distance from the axis of rotation.


Further, in the manufacture of blisks and blings, although the individual blades can be weighed and moment weighed prior to being assembled (e.g. welded) to the disc/ring, the filling of the internal cavities of the blades after assembly can lead to uncertain or variable amounts of filler material being located in the blades. This can also lead to significant disturbance of the static or dynamic rotational balance of the blisk/bling.


One approach for balancing the blisk/bling might be to incompletely fill some or all of the blades in order to achieve rotational balance. That is, the filler material can also serve as a balancing aid whose mass is effectively added or removed as required. However, this approach adds manufacturing costs in terms of process control and can result in reduced overall damping performance.


Thus, according to embodiments of the present invention, blinks or blings having filled (e.g. viscoelastically damped) hollow blades are balanced by determining the internal volumes of the blades, and preferably also the internal geometries of the hollow blades, prior to filling, and then selecting their positions in the assembled blisk/bling on the basis of the predicted masses and moment weights of the filled blades.



FIG. 1 is a flow chart which illustrates stages in such a procedure, as applied to the assembly of a blisk. Firstly a population of blades is provided 1, each blade having an internal cavity which will in due course be filled with a viscoelastic filler. The masses and moment weights of the blades are measured using techniques conventional in the art. The internal volumes, and preferably the internal geometries, of the blades are measured using techniques discussed below. Next, using the measured masses, moment weights, internal volumes and preferably the internal geometries, the masses and moment weights of the filled blades are predicted 2. These predictions are used to select relative positions of the blades on the disk which will reduce or eliminate static and dynamic unbalance when the blades are filled. The blades are then assembled (e.g. welded) to the disk 3 in the selected positions. At this stage, the assembled blisk is still unbalanced. The final stage is then to fill the cavities of the blades with viscoelastic filler 4, resulting in a substantially balanced blisk. Further each blade is completely filled, which advantageously improves the overall damping performance. As the balancing work is performed prior to the filler injection, the injection process can be simplified. In particular, a simplified injection process with identical parameters for each blade can be used, which facilitates a streamlined manufacturing process.


The internal volume of each blade can be determined by gas pressure analysis. For example, a sealed known volume (V−1) of gas at a known pressure (P−1) can be released into the sealed cavity of the blade. The resulting volume (V−2) consists of (V−1) and the volume of the cavity (V-blade). A consequence of releasing the known volume of gas into the blade cavity is a drop in pressure to (P−2). Using the ideal gas laws, the relationship (P−1)/(P−2) can be used to calculate (V-blade).


Alternatively, the blade internal volume can be calculated using CT scanning data or ultrasonic CMM data. This approach may be desirable if CT scanning data or ultrasonic CMM inspection is anyway going to be used to measure the geometry of the blade cavity.


Advantages of the procedure may include:

    • Simplified filler injection process parameters.
    • As the blisk/bling is generally already substantially balanced after injection of the filler material, it may be unnecessary to add additional weights to correct out-of-balance.
    • For similar reasons, it may be possible to remove lands for balance correction, reducing the weight of the blisk/bling.
    • Reduction of component cost and lead-time by the avoidance of post-assembly balance correction machining.
    • Reduced mass moment weight scatter for fan blades, providing significant logistics benefits.


While the invention has been described in conjunction with the exemplary embodiments described above, many equivalent modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art when given this disclosure. For example, although the invention has been described in relation to the rotational balancing of blisks and blings, it may also be applied to other rotating parts, such as propeller assemblies, wind turbines, hollow propellers and low weight flywheels. Accordingly, the exemplary embodiments of the invention set forth above are considered to be illustrative and not limiting. Various changes to the described embodiments may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.


All references referred to above are hereby incorporated by reference.

Claims
  • 1. A method of manufacturing a rotationally balanced rotating part, the method comprising the steps of: providing a rotor hub or rotor ring and a plurality of rotor blades for assembly onto the rotor hub or rotor ring, each blade having an internal cavity;determining an initial mass, an initial moment weight and an internal cavity volume for each of the plurality of rotor blades;predicting a final mass and a final moment weight of each of the plurality of rotor blades based on the determined initial mass, initial moment weight and internal cavity volume;assembling the plurality of rotor blades onto the rotor hub or rotor ring to form the rotating part;wherein the position of each of the plurality of rotor blades relative to the remaining plurality of rotor blades on the rotor hub or rotor ring is based on the predicted final mass and final moment weight of each of the plurality of rotor blades; andsubsequently filling the internal cavity of each of the plurality of rotor blades after each of the plurality of rotor blades has been assembled onto the rotor hub or rotor ring to form the rotating part.
  • 2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the rotating part is a blisk, the plurality of rotor blades being assembled onto the rotor hub; and wherein the rotor hub is provided in the form of a disk in order to form the blisk.
  • 3. A method according to claim 1, wherein the rotating part is a bling, the plurality of rotor blades being assembled onto the rotor ring in order to form the bling.
  • 4. A method according to claim 1, wherein the internal cavity volume of each of the plurality of rotor blades is determined by gas pressure analysis, CT scanning or ultrasonic CMM inspection.
  • 5. A method according to claim 1, wherein the determining step includes determining the shape of the internal cavity of each of the plurality of rotor blades.
  • 6. A method according to claim 5, wherein the shape of the internal cavity of each of the plurality of rotor blades is determined by CT scanning or ultrasonic CMM inspection.
  • 7. A method according to claim 1, wherein the internal cavity of each of the plurality of rotor blades is filled with a vibration damping material.
  • 8. A method according to claim 7, wherein the vibration damping material is a viscoelastic damping material.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
1009216.1 Jun 2010 GB national
US Referenced Citations (88)
Number Name Date Kind
2202014 Lougheed May 1940 A
3111747 Johnson Nov 1963 A
3736638 Stone, Jr. Jun 1973 A
3927817 Hamilton et al. Dec 1975 A
4217397 Hayase et al. Aug 1980 A
4292375 Ko Sep 1981 A
4304821 Hayase et al. Dec 1981 A
4331284 Schulz et al. May 1982 A
4460314 Fuller Jul 1984 A
4522860 Scott et al. Jun 1985 A
4530197 Rainville Jul 1985 A
4583914 Craig et al. Apr 1986 A
4642863 Schulz Feb 1987 A
4655014 Krecke Apr 1987 A
4811890 Dowling et al. Mar 1989 A
4882823 Weisert et al. Nov 1989 A
5007225 Teasdale Apr 1991 A
5119531 Berger et al. Jun 1992 A
5143276 Mansbridge et al. Sep 1992 A
5240376 Velicki Aug 1993 A
5243758 LeMonds et al. Sep 1993 A
5253419 Collot et al. Oct 1993 A
5323953 Adderley et al. Jun 1994 A
5330092 Gregg et al. Jul 1994 A
5384959 Velicki Jan 1995 A
5419039 Auxier et al. May 1995 A
5469618 LeMonds et al. Nov 1995 A
5534354 Gregg et al. Jul 1996 A
5537861 Seitelman et al. Jul 1996 A
5544805 Alassoeur et al. Aug 1996 A
5570552 Nehring Nov 1996 A
5692881 Leibrfied Dec 1997 A
5723225 Yasui et al. Mar 1998 A
5821506 Matsen Oct 1998 A
5826332 Bichon et al. Oct 1998 A
5881459 Yasui Mar 1999 A
5941446 Yasui Aug 1999 A
6039542 Schilling et al. Mar 2000 A
6139278 Mowbray et al. Oct 2000 A
6224341 Fricke May 2001 B1
6287080 Evans et al. Sep 2001 B1
6331217 Burke et al. Dec 2001 B1
6419146 Buldhaupt et al. Jul 2002 B1
6467168 Wallis Oct 2002 B2
6669447 Norris et al. Dec 2003 B2
6720087 Fried et al. Apr 2004 B2
6893211 Eibl et al. May 2005 B1
6908285 Henning et al. Jun 2005 B2
6979180 Motherwell Dec 2005 B2
7025568 Jones Apr 2006 B2
7070390 Powell Jul 2006 B2
7090464 Henning et al. Aug 2006 B2
7144222 Lanni et al. Dec 2006 B2
7247003 Burke et al. Jul 2007 B2
7287958 Henning et al. Oct 2007 B2
7311500 Rongong et al. Dec 2007 B2
7406849 Ueno et al. Aug 2008 B2
7431197 Franchet et al. Oct 2008 B2
7470114 Bonnet Dec 2008 B2
7572101 Mickol et al. Aug 2009 B2
7739072 DeBlois et al. Jun 2010 B2
7753654 Read et al. Jul 2010 B2
7979233 DeBlois et al. Jul 2011 B2
8180596 Henning et al. May 2012 B2
8186057 Harrison et al. May 2012 B2
8382441 Brennand et al. Feb 2013 B2
20020014101 Yajima Feb 2002 A1
20030136815 Debaisieux et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030156942 Villhard Aug 2003 A1
20030164255 Borroni-Bird et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040013523 Berger et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040018091 Rongong et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040191069 Motherwell Sep 2004 A1
20060066133 Ueno et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060255098 Runyan Nov 2006 A1
20070065291 Karafillis Mar 2007 A1
20070243070 Matheny Oct 2007 A1
20070243408 Straza Oct 2007 A1
20080025846 Vance et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080260538 Wilson et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090057488 Goldfinch et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090057489 Goldfinch et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090057718 Suvorov et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090060718 Goldfinch et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090304517 Strother Dec 2009 A1
20100021693 Goldfinch et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100040479 Spangler et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100186215 Jones et al. Jul 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (90)
Number Date Country
0 130 583 Jan 1985 EP
0 181 203 May 1986 EP
0 209 867 Jan 1987 EP
0 358 523 Mar 1990 EP
0 418 179 Mar 1991 EP
0 469 221 Feb 1992 EP
0 354 631 Jun 1992 EP
0 500 458 Aug 1992 EP
0 520 827 Dec 1992 EP
0 527 564 Feb 1993 EP
0 549 172 Jun 1993 EP
0 555 534 Aug 1993 EP
0 582 795 Feb 1994 EP
0 594 885 May 1994 EP
0 765 711 Apr 1997 EP
0 716 273 Mar 1998 EP
0 926 312 Jun 1999 EP
1 013 355 Jun 2000 EP
1 085 288 Mar 2001 EP
0 594 886 Jul 2001 EP
1 160 752 Dec 2001 EP
1 184 768 Mar 2002 EP
1 024 330 Nov 2002 EP
0 886 813 Jan 2003 EP
1 327 489 Jul 2003 EP
1 355 212 Oct 2003 EP
1 433 993 Jun 2004 EP
1 460 347 Sep 2004 EP
1 460 507 Sep 2004 EP
1 466 692 Oct 2004 EP
1 491 980 Dec 2004 EP
1 541 953 Jun 2005 EP
1 561 901 Aug 2005 EP
1 160 640 Feb 2006 EP
1 653 165 May 2006 EP
1 811 129 Jul 2007 EP
2 014 384 Jan 2009 EP
2 014 386 Jan 2009 EP
2 014 387 Jan 2009 EP
2 014 388 Jan 2009 EP
2119871 Nov 2009 EP
2 147 731 Jan 2010 EP
2 223 766 Sep 2010 EP
842937 Jul 1960 GB
1 367 958 Sep 1974 GB
1 437 510 May 1976 GB
2 124 520 Feb 1984 GB
2 154 287 Sep 1985 GB
1 284 867 Jul 1987 GB
2 193 306 Feb 1988 GB
2 198 264 Jun 1988 GB
2 202 619 Sep 1988 GB
2 206 685 Jan 1989 GB
2 211 593 Jul 1989 GB
2 228 069 Aug 1990 GB
2 249 615 May 1992 GB
2 251 063 Jun 1992 GB
2 261 032 May 1993 GB
2 298 265 Aug 1996 GB
2 305 720 Apr 1997 GB
2 360 070 Sep 2001 GB
2 371 095 Jul 2002 GB
2 387 669 Oct 2003 GB
2 391 270 Feb 2004 GB
2 393 498 Mar 2004 GB
2 397 855 Aug 2004 GB
2 401 407 Nov 2004 GB
2 402 716 Dec 2004 GB
2 408 295 May 2005 GB
2 411 462 Aug 2005 GB
2 416 228 Jan 2006 GB
2 438 185 Nov 2007 GB
2 014 869 Jan 2009 GB
2 450 934 Jan 2009 GB
2 450 935 Jan 2009 GB
A-2008-133825 Jun 2008 JP
WO 9727045 Jul 1997 WO
WO 0070271 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0156332 Aug 2001 WO
WO 0182018 Nov 2001 WO
WO 0248615 Jun 2002 WO
WO 03025469 Mar 2003 WO
WO 03042607 May 2003 WO
WO 03093916 Nov 2003 WO
WO 2004102077 Nov 2004 WO
WO 2005022953 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005045326 May 2005 WO
WO 2005067619 Jul 2005 WO
WO 2005069820 Aug 2005 WO
WO 2005071510 Aug 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (66)
Entry
Feb. 21, 2013 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/216,505.
Apr. 16, 2012 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/216,502.
Search Report issued in British Application No. GB1009216.1 dated Sep. 2, 2010.
Sep. 16, 2013 European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. EP 10 17 0940.
Sep. 2, 2009 European Search Report issued in European Application No. 09 25 1341.
Dec. 14, 2010 Search Report issued in British Application No. GB1020063.2.
Jul. 28, 2009 Search Report issued in British Patent Application No. 0907004.6.
Jul. 27, 2010 Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. EP 10 15 7495.2.
Jan. 19, 2010 Search Report issued in British Patent Application No. 0916687.7.
May 19, 2010 European Search Report issued in related European Patent Application No. 09252779.5 (with Abstract).
May 5, 2009 British Search Report issued in related British Patent Application No. GB0901235.2.
Mar. 18, 2009 British Search Report issued in British Patent Application No. GB0901318.6.
Oct. 7, 2008 European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 08 01 1077.
Oct. 20, 2008 European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 08 01 1078.
Oct. 21, 2008 European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 08 01 1079.
Dec. 7, 2010 Search Report issued in British Application No. GB1013305.6.
Sep. 15, 2009 Search Report issued in British Application No. GB0911416.6.
May 11, 2011 Partial European Search Report issued in European Application No. 10 16 5255.
Sep. 22, 2008 Search Report issued in British Application No. GB0808840.3.
Aug. 28, 2007 Search Report issued in British Application No. GB0713700.3.
Sep. 16, 2008 Search Report issued in British Application No. GB0813539.4.
Mar. 7, 2008 Search Report issued in British Application No. GB0713699.7.
Oct. 12, 2007 Search Report issued in British Application No. GB0713699.7.
Jul. 26, 2011 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/453,762.
Sep. 12, 2011 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/453,762.
Dec. 21, 2011 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/453,762.
Jul. 1, 2011 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/216,503.
Dec. 27, 2011 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/216,503.
Sep. 26, 2011 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/453,435.
Feb. 25, 2011 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/216,505.
Jun. 2, 2011 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/216,505.
Nov. 23, 2011 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/216,505.
Feb. 3, 2011 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/216,497.
Jul. 20, 2011 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/216,497.
Mar. 9, 2011 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/216,502.
Dec. 6, 2010 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/216,502.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/299,671 in the name of Strother, filed Nov. 18, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/654,504 in the name of Jones et al., filed Dec. 22, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/645,211 in the name of Strother, filed Dec. 14, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/844,215 in the name of Harron, filed Jul. 27, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/730,641 in the name of Strother, filed Mar. 24, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/216,503 in the name of Goldfinch et al, filed Jul. 7, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/186,850 in the name of Goldfinch et al, filed Jul. 20, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/453,762 in the name of Goldfinch, filed May 21, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/216,505 in the name of Strother, filed Jul. 7, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/453,435 in the name of Strother, filed May 11, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/796,231 in the name of Mason, filed Jun. 8, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/008,323 in the name of Strother, filed Jan. 18, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/720,253 in the name of Strother, filed Mar. 9, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/720,351 in the name of Strother, filed Mar. 9, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/216,502 in the name of Goldfinch et al., filed Jul. 7, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/216,497 in the name of Goldfinch et al., filed Jul. 7, 2008.
Jun. 29, 2012 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/654,504.
Jan. 17, 2013 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/654,211.
Mar. 7, 2012 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/453,435.
Jun. 20, 2013 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/730,641.
Jul. 9, 2013 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/453,762.
Aug. 21, 2013 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/796,231.
Sep. 3, 2013 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/654,211.
Sep. 6, 2012 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/216,505.
Mar. 12, 2012 Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/216,503.
Mar. 20, 2012 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/216,505.
Oct. 10, 2013 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/216,505.
Dec. 6, 2013 Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. Ep 11 17 4688.
Dec. 2, 2013 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/730,641.
Feb. 10, 2014 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/186,850.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110296686 A1 Dec 2011 US