This application claims the priority of United Kingdom Application No. 0903052.9, filed Feb. 24, 2009, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to a rotor assembly for a compressor.
The rotor assembly of a compressor typically comprises an impeller mounted to a shaft that is driven by a motor. Imbalance in the rotor assembly places increased loading on the bearings used to mount the rotor assembly within the compressor, thereby reducing the lifespan of the bearings. The rotor assembly is therefore ideally balanced prior to mounting within the compressor. However, it is not always possible to balance the rotor assembly as a complete unit prior to mounting within the compressor. Instead, it is often necessary to assemble the various components of the rotor assembly within the compressor. Accordingly, while the individual components may be balanced, the completed rotor assembly may not be. Moreover, even when it proves possible to dynamically balance the rotor assembly, imbalance often subsequently arises as a result of component wear and thermal distortion.
In a first aspect, the present invention provides a rotor assembly comprising a shaft to which are mounted an impeller and a bearing assembly, wherein the bearing assembly is located at least partly within the profile of the impeller and comprises a pair of spaced bearings surrounded by a sleeve.
The profile of the impeller is bounded axially by those ends or points of the impeller that extend furthest in the axial direction. Accordingly, the profile of the impeller may be bounded by the hub, the blades and/or the shroud of the impeller.
By having a bearing assembly that is located at least partly within the profile of the impeller, loading of the bearing assembly due to impeller imbalance is significantly reduced. Consequently, the lifespan of the bearing assembly is prolonged. Additionally, by locating the bearing assembly within the profile of the impeller, the cantilever length of the rotor assembly is reduced. This then increases the stiffness of the rotor assembly, which in turn results in a higher first flexural natural frequency. Consequently, the rotor assembly is able to operate at much higher sub-critical speeds.
In having a bearing assembly that comprises a pair of spaced bearings surrounded by a common sleeve, a first portion of the bearing assembly may be located inside the impeller profile while a second portion may be located outside the impeller profile. The portion located outside of the impeller may then be secured to a frame, housing or the like. Consequently, the rotor assembly may be secured to a frame or housing over a relatively large surface area, thus ensuring good securement. Moreover, in having a pair of spaced bearings, the bearing assembly provides a good, stable support for the rotor assembly.
Preferably, the bearing assembly is located at least partly within a recess in the impeller. More preferably, an end of the impeller is spaced radially from the shaft to define the recess in the impeller.
The impeller ideally comprises a hub supporting a plurality of blades and a recess is formed in an end of the hub. The end of the hub is thus spaced radially from the shaft. The bearing assembly is then located at least partly within the recess. The centre-of-mass of the impeller is typically located between the two axial ends of the hub. By locating the bearing assembly within a recess in the hub, the bearing assembly may be located closer to the centre-of-mass of the impeller. Consequently, the cantilever length of the rotor assembly, as well as radial loading arising from impeller imbalance, may be reduced.
Advantageously, the hub comprises a bore into which the shaft is received and the recess in the end of the hub is greater in diameter than that of the bore. While the recess is greater in diameter than that of the bore, it is not necessary that the recess has a circular cross-section. Instead, the recess need only extend beyond the diameter of the bore.
The recess in the end of the hub may be formed in different ways. For example, the hub may include a domed wall having a concave inner surface such that a recess is defined in the bottom of the hub; the bottom end of the hub is then spaced from the shaft. By way of further example, the hub may include an annular recess in the top of the hub; the top end of the hub is then spaced from the shaft.
The bearing assembly may overlie the centre-of-mass of the impeller. This then has the advantage that radial loading due to subsequent imbalance in the impeller may be kept to a minimum.
The bearing assembly may comprise a bearing that is located wholly within the profile of the impeller. In so doing, the bearing may then overlie or at least be located closer to the centre-of-mass of the impeller.
In a second aspect, the present invention provides a rotor assembly comprising a shaft to which are mounted an impeller and a bearing assembly, wherein the impeller comprises a hub supporting a plurality of blades and a recess formed in a top end of the hub, and the bearing assembly is located at least partly within the recess.
By locating the bearing assembly at least partly within a recess in the top of the impeller, the bearing assembly is located closer to the centre-of-mass of the impeller. Consequently, loading of the bearing assembly due to impeller imbalance is reduced and the lifespan of the bearing assembly is increased. Additionally, the cantilever length of the rotor assembly is reduced thus increasing the stiffness of the rotor assembly, which in turn enables the rotor assembly to operate at higher sub-critical speeds.
The bearing assembly may comprise a bearing that is located wholly within the profile of the impeller. In so doing, the bearing may then be located closer to the centre-of-mass of the impeller.
Preferably, the hub is spaced radially from the bearing assembly, i.e. a clearance exists between the hub and bearing assembly. Consequently, the impeller is free to rotate relative to the outer surface of the bearing assembly.
The bearing assembly may comprise one or more bearings. Advantageously, the bearing assembly takes the form of a bearing cartridge that comprises a pair of spaced bearings surrounded by a common sleeve. As already noted, this then has the advantage that a first portion of the bearing assembly may be located inside the impeller profile while a second portion may be located outside the impeller profile. The portion located outside of the impeller may then be secured to a frame, housing or the like. Additionally, in having a pair of spaced bearings, the bearing assembly provides a good, stable support for the rotor assembly.
The impeller may be a semi-open or closed impeller. In particular, the impeller may include a shroud, with the plurality of blades then extending between the hub and the shroud.
In a third aspect, the present invention provides a rotor assembly comprising a shaft to which are mounted an impeller and a bearing assembly, wherein the impeller comprises a hub supporting a plurality of blades and a recess formed in a top end of the hub, the bearing assembly is located at least partly within the recess and comprises a pair of spaced bearings surrounded by a common sleeve, and the hub is spaced radially from the bearing assembly such that the impeller is free to rotate relative to the sleeve.
In order that the present invention may be more readily understood, embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawing, in which:
The rotor assembly 1 comprises a shaft 2 to which are mounted an impeller 3 and a bearing cartridge 4.
The impeller 3 comprises a hub 5 around which a plurality of blades 6 are supported. The hub 5 extends axially from a top end 7 to a bottom end 8. A central bore 9 extends through the hub 5 into which the shaft 2 is received. The hub 5 includes a dome-shaped wall 10 having a concave inner surface 11 that defines a central recess 12 in the bottom 8 of the hub 5. The recess 12 is greater in diameter than that of the bore 9 such that the bottom end 8 of the hub 5 is spaced radially from the shaft 2.
The bearing cartridge 4 comprises a pair of spaced bearings 13,14 preloaded by a spring 15 and surrounded by a sleeve 16. The bearing cartridge 4 is mounted to the shaft 2 such that the bearing cartridge 4 projects into the recess 12 formed in the bottom 8 of the hub 5. The bearing cartridge 4 is thus partly located within the profile of the impeller 3, i.e. the region bounded between the top 7 and bottom 8 of the hub 5.
The bearing cartridge 4 provides means by which the rotor assembly 1 may be mounted to a frame, housing or the like. Since the recess 12 formed in the hub 5 is relatively large, the frame may extend into the recess 12 such that the bearing cartridge 4 is secured along its entire length. However, it is not essential that the bearing cartridge 4 is secured along its entire length and the bearing cartridge 4 might equally be secured over a portion only, e.g. the portion of the bearing cartridge 4 that is not located within the impeller profile. The provision of a bearing cartridge 4 has the advantage of presenting a relatively large surface area, namely the sleeve 16, over which the bearing cartridge 4 may be secured to the frame. Consequently, a good securement may be formed between the rotor assembly 1 and the frame. Moreover, in having a pair of spaced bearings 13,14, the bearing assembly 4 provides a good, stable support for the rotor assembly 1.
Owing to its relatively large diameter, any imbalance in the impeller 3 may cause a relatively large moment of force to act on the shaft 2 when the rotor assembly 1 is rotating at speed. The bearing cartridge 4, and in particular the bearing 13 proximate the impeller 3, must then oppose this moment of force in order to maintain the position of the shaft 2.
By locating the bearing cartridge 4 at least partly within the profile of the impeller 3, the distance between the bearing 13 and the centre-of-mass of the impeller is reduced. Consequently, any imbalance in the impeller 3, which causes the centre-of-mass of the impeller 3 to shift from the rotational axis, results in a much smaller moment of force and thus radial loading of the bearing 13 is significantly reduced.
Additionally, locating the bearing cartridge 4 within the profile of the impeller 3 reduces the cantilever length of the rotor assembly 1. This then increases the stiffness of the rotor assembly 1, which in turn results in a higher first flexural natural frequency. The rotor assembly 1 is therefore able to operate sub-critically (i.e. below the first natural frequency) at much higher speeds. By operating at sub-critical speeds, balancing of the rotor assembly 1 is made much simpler, as is management of the rotor assembly 1 during transient operation conditions (e.g. during acceleration and deceleration of the rotor assembly 1).
In the embodiment illustrated in
The impeller 21 comprises a hub 22 around which a plurality of blades 23 are supported. The hub 22 extends axially from a top end 24 to a bottom end 25. A central bore 26 extends through the hub 5 into which the shaft 2 is received. A central, annular recess 27 is formed in the top end 24 of the hub 22. The recess 27 is greater in diameter than that of the bore 26 such that the top end 24 of the hub 22 is spaced radially from the shaft 2.
The bearing cartridge 4 projects into the recess 27 in the top 24 of the hub 22. The bearing cartridge 4 is thus partly located within the profile of the impeller 21, i.e. the region bounded by the top 24 and bottom 25 of the hub 22. A clearance exists between the bearing cartridge 4 and the hub 22 such that the impeller 3 is free to rotate relative to the sleeve 16 of the bearing cartridge 4.
The portion of the bearing cartridge 4 that does not project into the recess 27 of the hub 22 is available for securing to a frame, housing or like. It is not necessary that the frame be secured along the full length of the bearing cartridge 4 since the sleeve 14 acts as an extension of the frame. Nevertheless, should one wish to secure the frame along the full length of the bearing cartridge 4, the recess 27 in the top 24 of the hub 22 may be increased in size such that the frame may also project into the recess 27.
Again, since the bearing cartridge 4 is located at least partly within the profile of the impeller 21, the cantilever length of the rotor assembly 20 is shortened, resulting in a stiffer rotor assembly 20 of higher critical speed, and radial loading of the bearing 13 due to impeller imbalance is reduced. In the embodiment illustrated in
The impeller 31 comprises a two-part hub 32, a plurality of blades 33 and a shroud 34. The blades 33 are attached to and extend between a first part 35 of the hub 32 and the shroud 34. Each part 35,36 of the hub 32 includes a central bore 37,38 into which the shaft 2 is received. The two parts 35,36 of the hub 32 are mounted to the shaft 2 such that the hub 32 extends axially from a top end 39 to a bottom end 40, and the blades 33 extend between the top and bottom ends 39,40 of the hub 32.
A central, annular recess 41 is formed in the top end 39 of the hub 32, i.e. the top 39 of the first part 35 of the hub 32. The recess 41 is greater in diameter than that of the bore 37 such that the top end 39 of the hub 32 is spaced radially from the shaft 2.
As with the embodiment described above with reference to
In each of the embodiments described above, the profile of the impeller is bounded axially by the top and bottom of the hub. However, the profile of the impeller might equally be bounded by the shroud and/or the blades of the impeller. For example, if the lower part 36 of the hub 32 of the embodiment illustrated in
The rotor assembly of each of the above-described embodiments comprises a bearing cartridge 4 having a pair of spaced bearings 13,14 surrounded by a common sleeve 16. However, the rotor assembly might equally comprise an alternative type of bearing assembly. For example, the rotor assembly might comprise a double row bearing, a needle roller, or indeed a single ball bearing. Should it be necessary, the recess in the impeller may be sized so as to permit a frame or housing to also project into the recess such that the bearing assembly may be secured to the frame or housing.
The embodiments described above demonstrate that a bearing assembly may be partly located within a semi-open (
With the rotor assembly of the present invention, a bearing assembly is located at least partly with the profile of the impeller. Accordingly, any imbalance in the impeller results in a much smaller moment of force being applied to the shaft. Radial loading of the bearing assembly due to impeller imbalance is thus reduced and the lifespan of the bearing assembly is prolonged. Additionally, the cantilever length of the rotor assembly is shortened and thus a stiffer rotor assembly having a higher critical speed is realised.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0903052.9 | Feb 2009 | GB | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2107090 | Swennes | Feb 1938 | A |
2113167 | Baumheckel | Apr 1938 | A |
2235763 | Horton | Mar 1941 | A |
2908536 | Dickey | Oct 1959 | A |
2911138 | Birmann | Nov 1959 | A |
2939626 | Birmann | Jun 1960 | A |
2940658 | Birmann | Jun 1960 | A |
3068638 | Birmann | Dec 1962 | A |
3759592 | Carlson | Sep 1973 | A |
4147470 | Brooks et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4426089 | Takenaka et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4514140 | Knopf | Apr 1985 | A |
4652219 | McEachern, Jr. et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4806075 | Osterstrom et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4907897 | Shirotori | Mar 1990 | A |
5069603 | Schuetz et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5163811 | Okada | Nov 1992 | A |
5289067 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5520008 | Ophir et al. | May 1996 | A |
5961222 | Yabe et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6246137 | Obara | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6271612 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6368081 | Matsumoto | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6547538 | Tamura et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6652246 | Lin et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6717308 | Chen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
7077626 | Bosen | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7125172 | Ostling et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7207774 | Kashiwazaki et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7384247 | Anderson | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7416344 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
20040200215 | Woollenweber et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050207888 | Kashiwazaki et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050207919 | Anderson | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060023981 | Okayama | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060131973 | Chiu et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20080087018 | Woollenweber | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080237195 | Iwasa et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080304986 | Kenyon et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090081040 | Ueno et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090155055 | Chu | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100148600 | Bauer et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100215491 | Mockridge et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20130223997 | Childe et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10221443 | Dec 2003 | DE |
1025792 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1557578 | Jul 2005 | EP |
2 000 675 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2207247 | Jun 1974 | FR |
2393175 | Dec 1978 | FR |
2 483 024 | Nov 1981 | FR |
2 569 771 | Mar 1986 | FR |
788378 | Jan 1958 | GB |
1305166 | Jan 1973 | GB |
2175957 | Dec 1986 | GB |
2406146 | Mar 2005 | GB |
2442475 | Apr 2008 | GB |
59-97557 | Jul 1984 | JP |
62-117297 | Jul 1987 | JP |
63-9428 | Jan 1988 | JP |
1-242024 | Sep 1989 | JP |
3-85394 | Apr 1991 | JP |
4-3120 | Jan 1992 | JP |
5-87290 | Nov 1993 | JP |
6-66318 | Mar 1994 | JP |
2000-208078 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2001-73948 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001-303964 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2002-31133 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2003-97576 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2004-278538 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2004-316505 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2007-506053 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2008-92629 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008-144724 | Jun 2008 | JP |
2009-79628 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2011-106338 | Jun 2011 | JP |
WO-03027523 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO-2007021838 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO-2008026876 | Mar 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
GB Search Report dated Jun. 11, 2009, directed at counterpart GB Application No. 0903052.9; 2 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on May 4, 2010, directed towards corresponding International Application No. PCT/GB2010/050210; 10 pages. |
Muszynska, Agnieszka. Rotordynamics. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis, 2005. Print. p. 460. |
Mockridge et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Sep. 13, 2012, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/707,504; 14 pages. |
Mockridge et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Feb. 26, 2013, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/707,504; 12 pages. |
Mockridge et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Jun. 25, 2013, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/707,504; 8 pages. |
Mockridge et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Nov. 7, 2013, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/707,504; 9 pages. |
Childe et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Mar. 28, 2014, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 13/589,947; 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100215500 A1 | Aug 2010 | US |