Patent Application
20070131820
This application is related to U.S. Application No. 0002563USU, entitled “BRUSHLESS DIRECT CURRENT MOTOR BASED LINEAR OR ROTARY ACTUATOR FOR HELICOPTER ROTOR CONTROL” filed simultaneously herewith, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.
1. Field of the Invention
The present disclosure relates to rotorcraft control systems. More specifically, the present disclosure relates to rotorcraft control systems in which trailing-edge flaps are used for both primary flight control (PFC) and higher harmonic control (HHC).
2. Description of Related Art
For over a half-century, rotorcraft, such as, but not limited to, helicopters have included control systems using a swashplate for effectuating primary flight control of the rotorcraft. Although simple to implement, the swashplate control system suffers from several shortcomings, including large drag forces which significantly reduce energy efficiency, lack of higher harmonic control capability, and insufficient system redundancy.
Trailing-edge flaps have been used in the prior art for purposes of higher harmonic control, that is, for reduction of noise and vibration in a rotorcraft. These flaps, often termed “active flaps” have typically been driven by electromechanical actuators or solenoids.
Thus, prior art rotorcraft have required two separate control systems: a swashplate system for primary flight control, and a noise and vibration reduction system for higher harmonic control. These two systems have increased the cost and complexity of prior art rotorcraft control systems.
Accordingly, there is a need for rotorcraft control systems that overcome one or more of the aforementioned and other deficiencies of the prior art control systems.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a swashplateless rotorcraft control system.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a rotorcraft control system that provides both primary flight control and higher harmonic control.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a rotorcraft control system that optimizes the use of actuators by separating the function of primary flight control and the function of higher harmonic control between a primary flap and a secondary flap, respectively.
These and other objects and advantages are achieved by the present invention that in one preferred embodiment provides a rotorcraft control system comprising at least one rotor blade having a trailing edge, a chord length, a span, and at least one primary flap, at least one primary actuator, at least one secondary flap, and at least one secondary actuator provided therein. The primary flap being operatively connected, preferably pivotally connected, to the trailing edge for movement among a neutral position, a positive position, and a negative position; the primary flap being principally used for primary flight control. The primary actuator is preferably operatively connected to the primary flap to move the primary flap among the neutral, positive, and negative positions. The secondary flap being operatively connected, preferably pivotally connected, to the trailing edge for movement among the neutral, positive, and negative positions; the secondary flap being principally used for higher harmonic control. The secondary actuator is preferably operatively connected to the secondary flap to move the secondary flap among the neutral, positive, and negative positions.
In an alternate preferred embodiment, a method of effectuating primary flight control and higher harmonic control of a rotorcraft having a rotor assembly including at least one rotor blade with a trailing edge is also provided. The method includes rotating the rotor blade through an azimuth, moving a primary flap among a neutral position, a positive position, and a negative position to carry out primary flight control of the rotorcraft, and moving a secondary flap among the neutral position, the positive position, and the negative position to carry out higher harmonic control of the rotorcraft. Both the primary flap and the secondary flap are operatively connected, preferably pivotally connected, to the trailing edge of the rotor blade.
In another alternate preferred embodiment, a rotorcraft including a body and a rotor assembly having at least one rotor blade is also provided. The rotor assembly is connected to the body and has at least one primary actuator in the at least one rotor blade, interfacing with and controlling at least one primary flap. The at least one primary actuator and the at least one primary flap are used principally for primary flight control. The rotor assembly also has at least one secondary actuator in the at least one rotor blade, interfacing with and controlling at least one secondary flap. The at least one secondary actuator and the at least one secondary flap are used principally for higher harmonic control.
The above-described and other features and advantages of the present disclosure will be appreciated and understood by those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, drawings, and appended claims.
For purposes of clarity, the control system 10 is illustrated in use with an exemplary helicopter (shown in phantom). Although a helicopter with a single main rotor is illustrated in
The control system 10 is a trailing-edge flap system capable of both primary flight control (PFC) and higher harmonic control (HHC). PFC relates to the lift of the rotorcraft that results in the vertical and translational movement of the rotorcraft through the magnitude and tilt of the rotor thrust. HHC relates to changing the individual orientation (i.e. pitch) of the blades at higher harmonics as it rotates to improve rotor performance, such as reducing the overall noise and vibration of the rotorcraft.
Traditionally, prior art rotorcraft have used a swashplate and its associated control linkages for PFC. Since the swashplate is generally exposed to the air, a large amount of hub drag is created. By incorporating the control system in accordance with the present invention, the swashplate is eliminated, which in turn significantly reduces hub drag, thus increasing the rotorcraft's fuel efficiency.
Moreover, in traditional rotorcraft, the swashplate and associated components, such as hydraulic actuators and control linkages, may constitute about 5% of the weight of the rotorcraft. Since the control system 10 of the present invention eliminates the need for these elements, the control system 10 also reduces the weight of the rotorcraft. The decrease in weight due to the control system 10 allows the rotorcraft to, for example, carry more fuel, which in turn can increase the range of the rotorcraft by approximately 20% or increase the payload capabilities of the rotorcraft while maintaining the same range capabilities.
In addition, since the control system 10 includes both PFC and HHC, it eliminates the need for the vibration reduction equipment of prior art control systems. As a result, the weight savings available through the use of the control system 10 can increase the range of the rotorcraft by approximately an additional 10% or increase the payload capabilities of the rotorcraft while maintaining the same range capabilities.
The operation of control system 10 is described with reference to
Each rotor blade 14 has one or more primary flaps 24 (only two shown) operatively connected to the rotor blade 14 so that the primary flaps 24 rotate about an axis parallel to the span R. Preferably, the primary flaps 24 are pivotally connected to the rotor blade 14. When the control system 10 includes more than one primary flap 24, each primary flap is preferably selectively and independently rotated. In addition, the control system 10 preferably can selectively and independently rotate the primary flap or flaps 24 on different rotor blades 14.
Each primary flap 24 can be rotated from a neutral position to either a positive position or a negative position. As used herein, the neutral position is defined as a position where the trailing-edge of the flap is substantially parallel to the trailing edge 18 of the rotor blade (
Each primary flap 24 is operatively connected to a primary actuator 28 that interfaces with and controls the movement of the primary flap 24. The primary actuator 28 can be any actuator known in the art having the sufficient power density and bandwidth to move the trailing edge flaps 24 as necessary. Preferably, the actuator is an electromechanical actuator. More preferably, the actuator is a brushless direct current motor (BLDC motor) based actuator as described in copending U.S. Application No. 0002563USU, entitled “BRUSHLESS DIRECT CURRENT MOTOR BASED LINEAR OR ROTARY ACTUATOR FOR HELICOPTER ROTOR CONTROL.” In addition, each primary actuator 28 has sufficient stroke to move the primary flap 24 to positive and negative positions that are sufficient to provide primary flight control to the rotorcraft. Thus, the control system 10 can use the primary flaps 24 for primary flight control (PFC) of the rotorcraft.
Each rotor blade 14 also has one or more secondary flaps 26 (only one shown) operatively connected to the rotor blade so that the secondary flap can be rotated about an axis parallel to the span R. Preferably, the secondary flaps 24 are pivotally connected to the rotor blade. When the control system 10 includes more than one secondary flap 26, each secondary flap is preferably selectively and independently rotated. In addition, the control system 10 preferably can selectively and independently rotate the secondary flap or flaps 26 on different rotor blades 14. The secondary flap 26 can also be rotated from the neutral position to either the positive or the negative position.
The secondary flap 26 is operatively connected to a secondary actuator 30 that interfaces with and controls the movement of the secondary flap. Preferably, the secondary actuator 30 is an electromechanical actuator with high power density and bandwidth. More preferably, the secondary actuator 30 is a BLDC motor based actuator as described in copending U.S. Application No. 0002563USU, entitled “BRUSHLESS DIRECT CURRENT MOTOR BASED LINEAR OR ROTARY ACTUATOR FOR HELICOPTER ROTOR CONTROL.” In addition, the secondary actuator 30 has sufficient stroke to move the secondary flap 26 to positive and negative positions that are sufficient to provide at least higher harmonic control to the rotorcraft. Thus, the control system 10 can use the secondary flaps 26 to reduce noise and vibration of the rotorcraft, more specifically, for higher harmonic control (HHC).
In accordance with the principles of the present invention, the inventors have determined that it is advantageous to divide the tasks of primary flight control and higher harmonic control between two sets of flaps on each rotor blade 14. That is, for example, the control system 10 can use primary flaps 24 exclusively for PFC and secondary flaps 26 for HHC. Thus, the control system 10 provides, on each rotor blade, one set of flaps (primary flaps 24) dedicated to PFC and another set of flaps (secondary flaps 26) dedicated to HHC.
Use of control system 10, having the PFC function and the HHC function divided between flaps 24 and 26, allows for the optimum use of actuators 28 and 30 for each particular task. For example, the present disclosure has determined that the requirements for PFC and HHC in terms of force, stroke, and frequency are very different, making it beneficial to have dedicated actuators for each of these functions. Thus, control system 10 includes primary actuator 28 that preferably has a low frequency and high stroke, whereas secondary actuator 30 preferably has a higher frequency and a much lower stroke.
For example, generally the frequency needed for PFC is once per revolution, while the frequency needed for HHC is in the range of 2-5 per revolution. Frequency is defined as the number of cycles per revolution of rotor blade 14. A cycle is defined as the movement of primary flap 24 or secondary flap 26 from one extreme position to the other and back again. For example, one cycle for primary flap 24 could be moving from the maximum negative position to the maximum positive position, then returning to the maximum negative position. Stroke is defined as the distance between the maximum positive position and the maximum negative position. The stroke requirements between PFC and HHC actuators may vary by an order of magnitude. Because the stroke and frequency requirements for PFC and HHC are so different, each of the primary actuators 28 of the control system 10 preferably independently control each of the primary flaps 24, while each of the secondary actuators 30 preferably independently controls each of the secondary flaps 26.
The primary actuator 28 is designed to optimally meet the specific requirements for PFC while the secondary actuator 30 is designed to optimally meet the specific requirements for HHC. It should be noted that although the force and stroke required for HHC are much less than the force and stroke required for PFC, the frequency requirements are much higher. As a result, the secondary actuator 30 does not necessarily have a lower power requirement than the primary actuator 28.
Although optimized for HHC, the secondary actuator 30 and the secondary flap 26 are also preferably capable of being used for PFC under certain flight conditions. That is, demands on the primary actuators 28 are higher during some flight conditions, such as, but not limited to, maximum maneuvering flight conditions. During such flight conditions, the control system 10 preferably can utilize the secondary actuator 30 and the secondary flap 26 to supplement and/or enhance PFC. Thus, the control system 10 can use the secondary actuator 30 to move the secondary flap 26, which is normally dedicated to HHC, to support and/or enhance the PFC demands. Moreover, preferably, the control system 10 can also use the secondary actuator 30 to move the secondary flap 26 in the event of a failure of one or more primary flaps 24 and/or primary actuators 28.
When the control system 10 uses secondary actuator 30 and the secondary flap 26 for PFC, it may be beneficial to move the secondary flap in a non-harmonic manner, that is, in a manner that cannot be defined nor achieved by the standard HHC frequency range of 2 to 5 per revolution. For example, to achieve lift enhancement on the retreating side of rotor assembly 12, the secondary flap 26 may require deployment over a specified azimuth range. In such a case, the movement of secondary flap 26 effectuated by secondary actuator 30 may not be readily represented through harmonics of 2-5 per revolution.
Advantageously, the control system 10 does not require that a single flap 24 or 26 control both PFC and HHC simultaneously. Rather, the control system 10 only controls the secondary flaps 26 and the secondary actuators 30 for PFC under the certain predetermined operating conditions. Although the control system 10 can use the secondary actuator 30 for PFC under some flight conditions, the secondary actuator is optimized for HHC. As a result, the overall power and torque requirements of the secondary actuator 30 are lowered as compared to the primary actuator 28, thus reducing the design and production costs of the rotorcraft. The control system 10 uses the primary actuator 28 and the primary flap 24 exclusively for PFC, and so the primary actuator and flap are not exposed to the intense operation loads required for HHC. The reduced operation loads on the primary actuator 28 and the primary flap 24 reduces maintenance costs and increases the effective service life of the control system 10.
The control system 10 can control the movement of the primary and the secondary actuators 28, 30, respectively, in any known manner. For example, the control system 10 can control the movement of the primary actuators 28 in conjunction with inputs from a pilot or from an automated primary flight control system. Similarly, the control system 10 can control the movement of the secondary actuators 30 in conjunction with inputs from a pilot or from an automated higher harmonic control system.
In the preferred embodiment shown in
Each individual primary flap 24 and secondary flap 26 may vary in size; the length and width of each flap may be different. The length is defined as a percentage of the chord length c of the rotor blade 14; the width is defined as a percentage of the span R of the rotor blade 14.
The width of the primary flaps 24, when added together preferably covers approximately 15% to approximately 35% of span R of the rotor blade 14. More preferably, the primary flaps 24 are approximately 20% to 25% of the span R of the rotor blade 14. The width of the secondary flaps 26, when added together preferably covers approximately 5% to approximately 15% of the span R of the rotor blade 14. More preferably, the secondary flaps 26 cover approximately 10% of the span R of the rotor blade 14. The total width of both the primary flaps 24 and the secondary flaps 26 should preferably cover approximately 25% to approximately 50% of the span R of the rotor blade 14. More preferably, the total width of both the primary flaps 24 and the secondary flaps is approximately 25% to approximately 40% of the span R of the rotor blade 14.
The length of both the primary flaps 24 and the secondary flaps 26 preferably covers approximately 15% to 25% of the total chord length c of the rotor blade 14. Preferably, the length of primary flaps 24 and secondary flaps 26 is approximately 20% of the total chord length c of rotor blade 14.
A method for operating the above-described rotorcraft system, as illustrated in
Simultaneously during the rotation of the rotor blade 14 through azimuth A, the secondary flap 26 is pivoted by a secondary actuator 30 so as to be positioned in either the neutral, positive, or negative positions, as necessary to reduce the noise and/or vibrations produced by the rotorcraft.
The terms “first”, “second”, “primary”, “secondary”, and the like may be used herein to modify various elements. These modifiers do not imply a spatial, sequential, or hierarchical order to the modified elements unless specifically stated.
While the present invention has been described with reference to one or more exemplary embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the present invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the disclosure without departing from the scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the present disclosure not be limited to the particular embodiment(s) disclosed as the best mode contemplated, but that the disclosure will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
