Not applicable.
The invention relates to a rough grinding wheel.
A rough grinding wheel of this kind is known from practice and is suitable for rough grinding of material surfaces of various materials. It comprises a wheel-shaped base body comprising a central recess for direct or indirect connection to a drive shaft of a tool. The central recess is penetrated by an axis of rotation. Furthermore, the base body comprises at least one abrasive layer.
The rough grinding wheel known to date does not exhibit satisfactory stability in particular at high speeds. A stable rough grinding wheel is a rough grinding wheel that stays stiff even at high contact pressure. A stable rough grinding wheel is easy to control, making it possible to achieve a defined or high stock removal rate.
The invention is based on the object of providing a rough grinding wheel of the kind mentioned above that is characterized by an improved structure and that in particular exhibits improved stability. This object is attained in an embodiment of the invention by the rough grinding wheel disclosed herein.
The rough grinding wheel according to the invention comprises a wheel-shaped base body comprising a central recess penetrated by an axis of rotation for direct or indirect connection to a drive shaft of a tool and comprising at least one abrasive layer. The rough grinding wheel according to the invention is characterized by a stabilizing core for stabilizing the rough grinding wheel, said stabilizing core being associated with the at least one abrasive layer and being circumferentially adjacent to the central recess. Furthermore, the stabilizing core has higher strength than the at least one abrasive layer.
Compared to the known rough grinding wheel, the stability can be further adapted and improved by using a core within the rough grinding wheel. This is because the core serves to stabilize the rough grinding wheel while the latter rotates.
Especially in the area of the central recess, where stresses due to the grinding process, such as rotation forces and lateral loads, concentrate, the stabilizing core can optimize the rough grinding wheel in terms of its stability without affecting the abrasive areas, the abrasive mixtures or the strength of the rough grinding wheel. This is because the stabilizing core absorbs forces acting on the at least one abrasive layer during grinding and transmits them evenly to the drive shaft of the tool. In the same way, the stabilizing core evenly transmits the forces exerted by a user to the at least one abrasive layer via the drive shaft of the tool. Thus, the stabilizing core additionally serves as a force transmission element between the at least one abrasive layer and the connection to a drive shaft of a tool. The advantages of the rough grinding wheel according to the invention rest both in the concentration of mass in the area of its center of rotation and in the indirect transmission of forces between the at least one abrasive layer and the drive shaft of the tool. In this way, the rough grinding wheel stays stable and easily controllable at all times even in case of high applied forces and contact pressures and/or at high speeds.
In a preferred embodiment of the rough grinding wheel according to the invention, a ratio of the outer radius of the stabilizing core to an outer radius of the rough grinding wheel is between 2:50 and 25:50. Preferably, the ratio is 17:50. This ratio leads to optimal stability and to a largest possible abrasive surface at the same time.
It is conceivable that the base body has at least two abrasive layers, a separating layer being arranged between adjacent abrasive layers. In this way, advantages arise in combination with the stabilizing core compared to known rough grinding wheels for the case in which both stability and strength of the rough grinding wheel are to be optimized. This is because in a known rough grinding wheel, one tries to compensate an adaption and improvement of stability and strength by means of separating layers arranged between individual abrasive layers. However, this leads to a target value conflict between stability and strength because these two target values influence each other. Compared to the known rough grinding wheel, further adaption and improvement of stability and strength can be achieved separately by using a core in combination with separating layers. This is because the core serves to stabilize the rough grinding wheel while the latter rotates. The separating layer, on the other hand, benefits the strength of the rough grinding wheel. In this way, both target values can be optimized or maximized independently of each other so as to ensure improved product properties.
The abrasive layers may contain various fillers and additives. The abrasive layers may comprise abrasive grits, such as regular brown fused alumina and derivatives, blue fired alumina, white fused alumina, zirconia alumina, silicon carbide, ceramic grain, pink fused alumina and/or monocrystalline alumina. Furthermore, the abrasive layers may comprise supporting fillers, such as polyaluminum fluoride, cryolite, pyrite, calcite, wollastonite and/or graphite, which may be bonded by means of phenolic resin systems.
Furthermore, a core segment defining the stabilizing core can be associated with at least one of the abrasive layers. In this way, it is possible to form the rough grinding wheel in layers without forgoing the advantages of the invention. In this embodiment, at least one separating layer thus extends from the recess or from a hub to the outer edge of the rough grinding wheel. The individual cores segments are connected to each other either directly via recesses in the corresponding separating layer or indirectly via the corresponding separating layer. An abrasive layer and a cores segment associated with the corresponding abrasive layer are arranged between adjacent separating layers. The stability of the rough grinding wheel is ensured in that the individual cores segments together benefit the strength of the rough grinding wheel and define the stabilizing core.
Other advantages and advantageous embodiments of the subject-matter of the invention can be taken from the description, the drawing and the claims.
An embodiment example of a rough grinding wheel according to the invention is illustrated in the drawing in a schematically simplified manner and will be explained in more detail in the following description.
The rough grinding wheel 1 illustrated in the drawing comprises a base body 3 having a layered structure. The base body 3 comprises a central recess 2 penetrated by an axis of rotation 5 located in the center of rotation of the rough grinding wheel 1. An insert 4 for attaching the rough grinding wheel 1 to a drive shaft of a tool is arranged in the recess 2. A reinforcing layer 6 is arranged on the tool side of the rough grinding wheel 1 facing toward the tool. The reinforcing layer 6 may comprise rutile, wollastonite, calcite and/or basalt, which may be phenolic resin-bonded. A grain size may be between 0.1 mm to 1.0 mm, preferably between 0.2 mm and 0.5 mm. Furthermore, the reinforcing layer 6 may comprise quartz sand. Thus, the reinforcing layer 6 has high strength. It may comprise a net-like interlining in order to further increase the stability of the rough grinding wheel 1.
Furthermore, the rough grinding wheel 1 comprises two abrasive layers 8a, 8b arranged on the side facing away from the tool side of the reinforcing layer 6. The abrasive layers 8a, 8b may comprise abrasive grits, such as regular brown fused alumina and derivatives, blue fired alumina, white fused alumina, zirconia alumina, silicon carbide, ceramic grain, pink fused alumina and/or monocrystalline alumina. Furthermore, the abrasive layers may comprise supporting fillers, such as polyaluminum fluoride, cryolite, pyrite, calcite, wollastonite and/or graphite, which may be bonded by means of phenolic resin systems. Thus, a phenolic resin/abrasive grain mixture is formed, which may contain various fillers and additives. A separating layer 10 is arranged between the two abrasive layers 8a, 8b. Furthermore, another separating layer 10 is arranged between the reinforcing layer 6 and abrasive layer 8a. Each of the separating layers 10 is formed by a glass tissue layer and benefits the strength of the rough grinding wheel 1. The separating layers 10 extend from an outer edge of the rough grinding wheel 1 to the central recess 2 and annularly surround the central recess 2.
Furthermore, the rough grinding wheel 1 comprises a stabilizing core 12 surrounding the axis of rotation 5 of the rough grinding wheel 1 and being adjacent to the central recess 2 and, in sections, forming the edge of the central recess 2. The stabilizing core 12 may comprise rutile, wollastonite, calcite and/or basalt, which may be phenolic resin-bonded. A grain size may be between 0.1 mm to 1.0 mm, preferably between 0.2 mm and 0.5 mm. Furthermore, the reinforcing layer 6 may comprise quartz sand. The stabilizing core 12 has higher strength than the abrasive layers 8a, 8b. The stabilizing core 12 is formed by two core segments 12a, 12b and serves as a force transmission element between the two abrasive layers 8a, 8b and the connection to the drive shaft of the tool.
A core segment 12a, 12b of the stabilizing core 12 is associated with each abrasive layer 8a, 8b. Core segment 12a is arranged between two separating layers 10 adjacent thereto. Core segment 12b is adjacent to a separating layer 10 at the tool side and is open, i.e. not covered by a separating layer 10, at the side facing the work piece. In consequence, the separating layers 10 divide the stabilizing core 12 into two core segments 12a, 12b. The two adjacent core segments 12a, 12b are connected to each other via the interposed separating layer 10 and define the stabilizing core 12.
The outer radius a of the stabilizing core 12 has a ratio of 17:50 to the outer radius b of the rough grinding wheel 1. Furthermore, the stabilizing core 12 has a constant radius across its thickness and in the axial direction of the rough grinding wheel 1.
To ensure an optimal connection to a tool, the central recess 2 is realized as a recessed hub.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102015004355.2 | Apr 2015 | DE | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/077,064 filed Mar. 22, 2016, which claims the priority benefit of German Patent Application No. 10 2015 004 355.2 filed Apr. 2, 2015. The contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in its entirety herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20100190424 | Francois | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20130305614 | Gaeta | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20150000206 | Klett | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150375367 | Sivasubramanian | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190240809 A1 | Aug 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15077064 | Mar 2016 | US |
Child | 16388088 | US |