This invention relates to machinery for finishing rough surfaces of lumber that pass through the machinery, and particularly to such machines that plane opposite faces of rough-cut lumber.
The basic features of rough lumber planers are well known. In general, a feed mechanism carries a workpiece between a series of knives that remove small portions of wood from both upper-facing and lower-facing surfaces of the wood.
In general terms, a planing machine (or simply “planer”) built according to the principles of the invention provides the best possible yield when planing rough lumber. Such a machine may have two planer heads, each head containing the conventional knives and supporting apparatus to perform the actual cutting of material. One head is for removing material from the top of the board, and the other is for removing material from the bottom of the board. To improve yield, the board is centered vertically as it progresses longitudinally through the planer. This is accomplished using either or (preferably) both of two systems: (1) a segmented self-centering drive roll system to feed the boards into the machine; and (2) a shoe mechanism which is controlled by a linkage such that the retracting segmented shoe assembly moves away from the planer head as it moves vertically to compensate for varying material thicknesses.
In preferred embodiments, the planing machine is an assembly for planing rough surfaces of a piece of wood, comprising: (a) a pair of planer heads positioned to remove material from opposing rough surfaces of the piece of wood; (b) a segmented self-centering drive roll system which feeds a leading edge of the piece of wood toward, and vertically centered between, the pair of planer heads (the leading edge being fed over a longitudinal gap between the drive roll system and the planer heads); and (c) at least one pair of sets of movable shoe subassemblies.
The basic concept is that two or four opposed drive roller assemblies (top and bottom) center, grip, and push the lumber through two opposed shoe assemblies (top and bottom) that further center and guide the lumber between two planer cutterhead assemblies (top and bottom) that remove equal amounts of wood from both sides of the lumber at the same time. Furthermore, both roller and shoe assemblies have multiple components (rollers and shoes) so that two or more boards of unequal thickness can be planed at the same time and still be centered properly to remove equal amounts of wood from both sides of both (or multiple) boards.
In preferred embodiments, the drive roll system comprises individual drive wheels mounted along a shaft. Such shafts and wheels are provided in pairs, one member of the pair positioned above or on top of the rough lumber, the other directly opposed to the first on the bottom of the lumber. There may be multiple pairs of such wheels, spaced longitudinally along the direction of travel of the lumber. The preferred construction of each drive wheel is a steel core, a resilient material surrounding the steel core, and a knurled rim surrounding the resilient material. In another preferred embodiment, the drive roll system comprises four feed roll assemblies rotationally driven in pairs, having opposing directions of motion relative to the piece of wood.
In other preferred embodiments, each member of the pair of movable shoe subassemblies comprises a vertically movable shaft and a shoe pivotably mounted to one end of the shaft such that the shoe is in the longitudinal gap. The shoe vertically holds the leading edge of the board despite vertical movement of the shaft. The shoe is mounted by each of a set of two linkages to a fixed mount. The linkages are not parallel to each other, so that the shoe moves away from the planer heads as it moves vertically. In preferred, but not required embodiments, the shoe has a lower surface facing the surface of the board, and the lower surface of the shoe comprises multiple stages. This allows the shoe to accommodate boards of varying thicknesses at varying amounts of insertion into the gap. Other variations include reciprocal vertical motion of the shoe, which can be accomplished by a spring, a pneumatic assembly (e.g., an air-filled bladder), and the like. The number of movable shoe subassemblies in each member of a pair may vary, i.e., it could be eight or ten in typical applications.
The figures are schematic and provided for illustration only, and thus do not limit the scope of the invention. In particular, common accessories and components, such a mounting hardware and electrical wiring, has been omitted solely for clarity.
In the description below, the longitudinal direction is direction of travel of the workpiece having its surface finished, i.e., longitudinal corresponds to “forward” or “reverse” directions of the workpiece. The transverse direction is perpendicular to longitudinal but within the plane of the workpiece, i.e., corresponding to the “width” of the throat of the apparatus into which the workpiece travels. The vertical direction is perpendicular to the plane of the workpiece, i.e., away from or toward the surface being finished (whether such surface is upward-facing or downward-facing).
In general terms, a planing machine (or simply “planer”) built according to the principles of the invention is illustrated in
Such a machine 100 may have two planer heads, each head 110 containing the conventional knives 120 (details of which are omitted for clarity only) and supporting apparatus to perform the actual cutting of material. One head is for removing material from the top of the board, and the other is for removing material from the bottom of the board.
It is important that the board be presented to the two planer heads in such a manner that an equal amount of material is removed from the top and bottom of the board. If more material is removed from one side or the other, yield will diminish.
Often, boards being fed longitudinally into a planer are not all the same thickness. Many conventional planers remove a constant amount of material from one side of each board, and a varying amount from the second side, instead of centering the board so that equal amounts are taken from each side. A thinner board will have less material removed from the second “non-constant” side, and this often results in a “skip,” or an area where inadequate material was removed to “clean up” the board.
However, it the board is centered vertically as it progresses longitudinally through the planer, the board is centered between the planer heads and equal amounts are planed from each side of every board every time.
Turning specifically to
As illustrated in the cross-sectional view of
Returning to
To minimize snipe, a shoe mechanism 300 is used to hold the board as close to the planer head as possible. The function of the shoe mechanism is to help center the board between the two opposing planer heads. A typical shoe design will move only vertically (up or down) away from the center of the board when different thickness material is presented to the planer head. The trouble is that as a shoe moves away from the centerline of the material, it will move into the space occupied by the planer head, destroying both the planer head and the shoe assembly. In order for a typical shoe arrangement to work in this configuration, the shoe assembly must be placed at some distance away from the planer head to allow for safe refraction of the shoe. The additional spacing away from the cutter results in poor support of the material as it approaches the planer head.
The unique feature of the retracting segmented shoe assembly 300 is that it moves away from the planer head as it moves vertically to compensate for varying material thicknesses. Turning to
Specifically, upper portion 450 of shoe 330 is pivotably mounted at 331 to the end of vertical shaft 340 (for example, by a cotter pin 360) at a slight angle from true vertical. Spring 350 (the spring windings are omitted for clarity only) provides for reciprocating, vertical motion of shaft 340, and thus shoe 330, with respect to the upper fixed mount 370. (The bottom of the shaft moves slightly as the shoe top rotates.) Upper and lower links 380 couple moving shoe 330 at 332, 333 to lower fixed mount 390, and are arranged to be not parallel with each other. This, and the slight angle from true vertical of shoe 330 combine to keep the tip 320 of shoe 330 close to planer head 120 as mentioned above.
As shown in more detail in
An alternative to use of a wound spring 350 on each shoe is a pneumatic assembly. One possible such assembly is illustrated schematically in
Bladder 510 may be held in position underneath fixed upper plate 520 by one or more brackets 530. Fixed upper plate 520 is analogous to fixed upper mount 370 (see
In general, there need only be an assembly which provides the resilience required for sufficient reciprocating, vertical motion of shaft 340 as described above. Such an assembly could be based on mechanical principles (an example of which is spring 350), pneumatic principles (as just described with respect to pneumatic assembly 500), or other principles producing the same result.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
182685 | Mahon | Sep 1876 | A |
2102186 | Nicholson | Dec 1937 | A |
2326076 | Solem | Aug 1943 | A |
2738813 | Pritchard | Mar 1956 | A |
2771104 | Saxe | Nov 1956 | A |
2819744 | Chuet | Jan 1958 | A |
2969816 | Johnsa | Jan 1961 | A |
4356045 | Elford | Oct 1982 | A |
4394878 | Rice | Jul 1983 | A |
4438795 | Plough | Mar 1984 | A |
4457350 | Finnila | Jul 1984 | A |
4611646 | Wassmer | Sep 1986 | A |
4724877 | Culley, Jr. | Feb 1988 | A |
4993464 | Englert | Feb 1991 | A |
5368077 | Croghan | Nov 1994 | A |
6296029 | Grivna | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6561239 | Englert | May 2003 | B2 |
6705455 | Lin | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7490641 | McGehee | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7971612 | Lapointe | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8360120 | Chuang | Jan 2013 | B2 |
9248516 | Shirk | Feb 2016 | B2 |
20090260718 | Wang | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20120132319 | Chuang | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61949753 | Mar 2014 | US |