The invention is directed to a rough pumping method for a displacement pump as well as to a displacement pump device for establishing a rough differential pressure.
In the present context, a rough differential pressure is understood to be a negative differential pressure in the sense of a rough vacuum or a positive differential pressure in the sense of an application of rough pressure. A typical rough vacuum has a magnitude of up to 500 mbar of differential pressure and typically ranges from 100 to 300 mbar of differential pressure. For a large variety of applications there is a great need for rough vacuum pumps that are mostly designed as single-shaft centrifugal compressors or as side channel blowers. Side channel blowers have a defined volume flow capacity and must continually be operated at a continuously high rotational speed. They operate based on the principle of torque transmission according to Euler's energy equation for compressible fluids. For the generation of a correspondingly low volume flow, side channel blowers must be operated at their full volume flow capacity, even if a large differential pressure exists between the inlet and the outlet of the compressor or blower. The power required by the compressor is proportional to the volume flow capacity, the theoretically required minimum power for compressing and transporting a small gas flow being proportional to the actual volume flow capacity. Due to this difference between the actual power output and the power physically required for compressing the gas, the use of such conventional rough vacuum compressors is inefficient.
Displacement pumps, such as a Roots pump, for example, are particular effective in maintaining low pressures with no large volume flows being conveyed, or in generating small differential pressures. For generating a rough vacuum with a large differential pressure, displacement pumps, such as Roots pumps, for example, are presently not employed.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a simple and energy-efficient rough pumping method as well as a corresponding rough pumping device.
The present application discloses a rough pumping method for a displacement pump, intended to generate a differential pressure between the inlet and the outlet of the displacement pump. The rotational speed of the displacement pump is adjusted such to the maximum differential pressure to be generated that the power input of the displacement pump approximates the minimum power physically required for compressing the gas and for generating the differential pressure. A displacement pump is advantageous over a conventional rough vacuum pump, such as a side channel blower, for example, in that the pumping power can be varied by varying the rotational speed or the piston stroke, respectively. Reducing the rotational speed allows to reduce the pressure generated and the power input of the displacement pump. The displacement pump is designed such that its maximum power input at maximum rotational speed is higher than the minimum power theoretically required for compressing the gas in order to establish a desired differential pressure. In other words, the pump is inherently capable of a greater pressure difference. Here, the differential pressure generated by the pump can be reduced such by reducing the rotational speed of the displacement pump, that the power input of the pump approximates the minimum power for compressing the gas. Adjusting the power input to the power required for compressing the gas is only possible with electronically controlled displacement pumps, however, not with conventional side channel blowers. A displacement pump allows to convey a contained gas volume from the pump inlet to the pump outlet at a variable rotational speed.
Preferably, the rotational speed is set using the relationship
in the no-flow condition, where
The rough differential pressure ΔPmax to be set can be in a range of up to −500 mbar or up to +500 mbar. In particular, a typical rough differential pressure is in a range from ±200 to ±400 mbar.
Preferably, the torque T of the pump drive is reduced as the differential pressure ΔP between the outlet pressure Pout and the inlet pressure Pin rises and the pump rotational speed increases. The torque is reduced above a rotational speed threshold Ωv/f, up to which preferably a constant torque prevails. The rotational speed threshold Ωv/f should be ≧0 and should preferably be below 30 Hz. Preferably, the torque decreases linearly above the rotational speed threshold Ωv/f over the differential pressure. In an electric motor, such a reduction of the torque can be achieved using an electronic inverter, where the rotational speed threshold Ωv/f should be chosen as small as possible. With an electronic inverter, it is possible to reach a rotational speed threshold Ωv/f of 10 Hz. A reduction of the torque as the differential pressure increases is advantageous because the torque T according to the formula
where
The displacement pump device of the present invention comprises not only a displacement pump, but a pump drive and a control means for reducing the rotational speed of the displacement pump. The displacement pump device preferably comprises a memory for the differential pressure ΔPimax to be achieved, which memory is a part of the control means. In particular, the memory contains a program for adjusting the rotational speed Ω.
The pump drive preferably is an electric motor and the control means may be an electric inverter in this case. The electric motor may be an induction motor, a reluctance motor or a brushless DC motor. The displacement pump preferably is a Roots pump or, alternatively, a claw screw pump or a dry-running rotary vane pump. The displacement pump may be of single-stage or multistage design, where the multiple stages may have different displacing capacities. The displacement pump may be air-cooled or liquid-cooled, e.g. by water or oil.
The invention is set forth in greater detail in the following description, including reference to the accompanying drawing in which
The displacement pump device 16 illustrated in
At the suction-side inlet 18 of the displacement pump 10, an inlet pressure Pin prevails in the suction channel of the pump. At the pressure-side outlet 20 of the displacement pump 10, an outlet pressure Pout prevails in the outlet channel of the displacement pump 10. As will be described hereunder with reference to
In
In
Here, the pump power of the displacement pump 10 is proportional to the differential pressure ΔP and has been given the reference numeral 3 in
The power physically required for compressing the gas in order to establish the differential pressure ΔPmax, is calculated from the relationship
Pwr=V·ΔP=V·(Pout−Pin).
This yields the minimum input power of the displacement pump 10 physically required for compressing the gas in order to establish the differential pressure ΔPmax. In
By comparing the maximum capacity 3 of the displacement pump 10 with the physical minimum input power 2, it becomes clear that the difference between these two powers increases as the inlet pressure Pin falls and that it is substantial especially with large differential pressures near ΔPmin. With smaller differential pressures near ΔP=0, however, the pump's capacity 3 is only slightly higher than the physically required minimum power 2. At low differential pressures ΔP, the displacement pump 10 thus operates most efficiently and becomes ever less efficient as the differential pressures rise. This is the reason why displacement pumps 10 have been used heretofore only to establish or maintain rather small differential pressures. For large differential pressures, as typically occur in rough pumping, displacement pumps have hitherto been ignored because of their low efficiency. Instead, side channel compressors are typically used in the rough pumping domain, which, however, have the disadvantage that they must continuously be driven at a constant rotational speed to reach their suction capacity. Therefore, a rotational speed control for improving the efficiency of pumps has been no option at all in the field of rough pumping.
The invention is based on the principle that displacement pumps convey a fixedly contained volume, the rotational speed of the displacement pump having no influence on the respective contained volume conveyed. With displacement pumps, the rotational speed merely influences the capacity of the conveyed contained volume. The invention uses this advantage in order to avoid operating an inherently over-capable displacement pump 10 with an over-capable capacity 3, but instead to approximate the pumping power 3, 4 to the minimum physically required input power 2 by reducing the rotational speed of the displacement pump 10. Hitherto, this has not been possible with known rough vacuum pumps, such as side channel compressors, for example.
The pump rotational speed is reduced by lowering the rotational speed of the electric motor 12 using the inverter 14. In this case, the pump rotational speed Ω, is adjusted through the relationship
Pin is the respective prevailing suction-side pressure at the inlet side 18 of the displacement pump 10. At the start of the pump Pin=Pout, so that ΔP=0. As the inlet pressure Pin falls, the back leakage caused by leakages within the pump rises. Here, CI is the associated back leakage conductance in cubic meters per hour. The back leakage conductance CI is calculated from
CI=(Pin·VS−Q)/(Pout−Pin),
where Q is the mass flow rate in millibar by cubic meters per hour. The mass flow rate Q is calculated from
Q=Pin·VS−CI·(Pout−Pin).
Starting from the capacity 3 of the displacement pump 10
Pwr=VS·(Pout−Pin)
the reduced rotational speed Ω for an approximation to the minimum physical input power 2 is determined as follows:
The volume flow capacity VS of the displacement pump is given and is 420 m3/h for the Roots pump of the embodiment. Typically, the capacity of rough vacuum glowers ranges from 1 to 2000 m3/h. The outlet pressure Pout is given as an atmospheric pressure of 1000 mbar so that the pumping power 3 increases as the inlet pressure Pin falls. While the inlet pressure Pin falls, the influence of the back leakage conductance CI within the pump increases. The volume flow capacity VS=420 m3/h is reached at the maximum rotational speed Ωmax=100 Hz. By reducing the rotational speed, a reduced volume flow capacity of
can be achieved.
The pump torque T is calculated from
T=Pwr/Ω
and with consideration to
Pwr=VS·ΔP/36.
for the reduced torque, thus yielding
It is obvious from the above that the inlet pressure Pin depends on the torque T applied. This correlation can be employed by using the inherent current control of an electronic inverter 14 to control the torque T by controlling the current in an electric motor 12. Using the inverter 14, the torque T of the pump drive 12 is continuously reduced above a limit rotational speed Ωv/f of 10 Hz as the differential pressure ΔP and the pump rotational speed rise. The torque band of the inverter is constant up to the limit rotational speed Ωv/f and, above this limit rotational speed Ωv/f, falls linearly to 0 at a constant rate. This is advantageous since the torque, according to the above equation, depends on the inlet pressure Pin so that only a certain torque is required to reach a certain input pressure Pin.
Since the power P, being the product of torque T and rotational speed Ω, also depends on the pump rotational speed, the rotational speed Ω of the displacement pump 10 is first set such that the minimum inlet pressure Pin,min is reached at the lowest rotational speed Ω possible so as to minimize the pumping power 3, 4 to be applied. When the displacement pump 10 is operated at this reduced rotational speed Ω, the above described torque band is then used with a continuously decreasing torque in order to approximate the power input 4 of the displacement pump 10 to the minimum power 2 physically required.
At a minimum inlet pressure Pin,min, with the volume flow being V=0, the inlet pressure is
Taking into account the back leakage conductance CI, the following applies if the volume flow is V=0
From this, the rotational speed Ω can be calculated, for which the pumping power, with consideration to the back leakage conductance CI due to leakages within the pump, approximates the minimum physical inlet power 2. Here, Pin is the approximated pump inlet pressure 4 that differs from the minimum physical inlet power 2 by the back leakage conductance CI within the pump. In
As illustrated in
Although the invention has been described and illustrated with reference to specific illustrative embodiments thereof, it is not intended that the invention be limited to those illustrative embodiments. Those skilled in the art will recognize that variations and modifications can be made without departing from the true scope of the invention as defined by the claims that follow. It is therefore intended to include within the invention all such variations and modifications as fall within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2009 017 887 | Apr 2009 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/055043 | 4/16/2010 | WO | 00 | 12/1/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/119121 | 10/21/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4664601 | Uchida et al. | May 1987 | A |
4770609 | Uchida et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4808095 | Nishitani et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
5674063 | Ozaki et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5746581 | Okumura et al. | May 1998 | A |
6200107 | Brewster | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6354805 | Moeller | Mar 2002 | B1 |
7621721 | Carboneri et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7814922 | Tollner | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8070459 | Tollner | Dec 2011 | B2 |
20020159898 | Rajendran et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20050031468 | Kawaguchi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3711143 | Oct 1987 | DE |
19630384 | Apr 1998 | DE |
19931961 | Feb 2001 | DE |
69525550 | Aug 2002 | DE |
602004007325 | Mar 2008 | DE |
1467100 | Oct 2004 | EP |
2007239639 | Sep 2007 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120063917 A1 | Mar 2012 | US |