The invention relates to apparatuses for playing roulette and methods for arranging indicia on roulette game surfaces and roulette wheels.
Roulette is a well-known game of chance enjoyed throughout the world. The equipment used for playing roulette generally comprises a roulette wheel and a game surface.
The roulette wheel generally comprises a horizontally disposed wheel mounted in a bowl-shaped housing. The wheel is adapted to rotate about a vertical axis and includes a plurality of pockets disposed around its periphery. Each pocket has a unique number associated with the pocket, as well as a color associated therewith. Each pocket is adapted to receive a small ball which is introduced into the bowl shaped housing by an operator or croupier as the wheel is set in motion. The wheel is typically spun in one direction and the ball projected around the circumference of the housing in an opposite direction. As the ball loses speed, it rolls down the concave housing wall, eventually coming to rest in one of the pockets. The outcome or result of the spin is the number and color associated with the pocket in which the ball comes to rest.
The game surface includes a plurality of wagering areas indicating various numbers, colors, parities (the odd or even quality of a number) and groupings of numbers. One or more players make wagers on a predicted outcome of a spin of the roulette wheel. A player indicates his or her wager by placing one or more wagering devices, such as chips or markers representing an amount of the wager, at a predetermined location on the game surface corresponding to a predicted outcome of a spin of the roulette wheel.
A prior art “Standard” roulette game surface or board 10 is shown in
A player may place a wager on a particular number by placing one or more chips or markers within the wagering area corresponding to that number. The table layout permits the player to place bets on individual numbers or combinations or groupings of individual numbers. For example, a player can wager on a column of numbers by placing one or more chips or markers adjacent to the column of numbers, on a row of numbers by placing one or more chips or markers adjacent to the row of numbers, on two rows of numbers by placing one or more chips or markers adjacent to the two rows of numbers, and on four adjoining numbers by placing one or more chips or markers at the intersection of the four adjoining numbers.
As shown in
Winning wagers in the game of roulette are paid out at predetermined multiples based on the probability of the particular predicted outcome. For example, a winning wager for an individual number may pay out at a ratio of 35 to 1; a winning wager for a row of three numbers may pay out at a ratio of 11 to 1; a winning wager for a group of four adjacent numbers may pay out at a ratio of 8 to 1; a winning wager for two adjacent rows of number may pay out at a ratio of 5 to 1; a winning wager for the combination of numbers 1 to 18 or the combination of numbers from 19 to 36 may pay out at a ratio of 1 to 1; a winning wager on a column of numbers may pay out at a ratio of 2 to 1; a winning wager on a block of twelve consecutive numbers (first twelve, second twelve or last twelve) may pay out at a ratio of 2 to 1, and a winning wager on an odd number; an even number, a red number or a black number may pay out even money. Other wager combinations and associated payout ratios may also be used. Table I below shows an example betting arrangements and corresponding payouts ratios:
The prior art (standard) American roulette wheel arrangement is shown in
The numbers from 1 to 36 are arranged at standardized positions on the prior art American wheel as shown in
As described in detail in applicant's issued U.S. Pat. No. 7,588,250, the contents of which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein, the arrangement of numbers and colors on the prior art roulette game surface shown in
In one example, as shown in
Further, the relationships among adjacent numbers on the prior art roulette wheels and their corresponding positions, groupings and characteristics on the prior art roulette game surface may allow experienced players to combine bets on red, black, even and odd numbers, columns and dozen groups to increase the player's chances of winning. For example in the prior art arrangements, players may “flower” the wheel by placing bets corresponding to a group of numbers positioned on the roulette wheel adjacent or in close proximity to one another. By utilizing progressive betting techniques and taking advantage of the relationship between the positions of the numbers on the roulette wheel and the various betting schemes (red, black, odd, even, column, dozen group) a professional or experienced player may increase his or her odds of winning.
There exists a need for improved roulette board game surface and wheel arrangements having a more “balanced” layout wherein red and black and even and odd numbers are evenly distributed. Moreover, the need exists for an improved roulette game surface and wheel arrangement wherein relationships between adjacent pairs or groups of numbers on the wheel and the arrangement and characteristics of numbers on the game surface are eliminated.
More particularly, one aspect of the Roulette Wheel game that has yet to be addressed in the gaming industry with respect to the layout of the game surface board and Roulette wheel indicia in the standard roulette (36 non-house numbers) embodiments is the effect of bias. For example, as a standard mechanical roulette wheel of 36 non-house numbers is designed so that the 37 or 38 possible numerical outcomes occur randomly and unpredictably (i.e., each outcome is equally likely to occur and information about previous outcomes does not change the estimated probability of the next outcome), a tendency for a particular number to occur more or less likely than 1/37 of the time in a standard European wheel, or 1/38 of the time in a standard American wheel, is referred to as a “bias”. Other types of non-randomness involving patterns of correlation between multiple outcomes, even while individual numbers remain equally likely on average, are also possible. Thus, sources of bias and non-randomness could cause roulette outcomes to become more predictable.
For mechanical roulette wheels, there is no software or numerical calculation occurring. The randomness is determined by the independence of the physical processes involved: the speed of rotation of the wheel; the deceleration of the rotation over time; the time at which a croupier releases the ball; the speed and spin with which the croupier releases the ball; the deceleration of the ball as it rotates before dropping; the bounces the ball makes when it hits the wheel; and the deflections of the ball by any baffles or other built-in irregularities in the bowl the wheel spins within.
Because the state of the system depends only on continuous physical variables such as rotation speed and ball position, there is no way for a mechanical roulette wheel to encode information about multiple previous outcomes. Therefore, the kinds of long range correlations between multiple outcomes that can occur in algorithmic random number generators are not significant in mechanical roulette wheels. Once the ball has fallen into a numbered slot, any information related to what slots it had previously fallen into is effectively erased. Although there may be a non-random relationship between one outcome and the next outcome, correlations and relationships between spins that are not consecutive are not to be expected, and tests for randomness in mechanical roulette wheels focus only on individual outcomes and correlations between consecutive outcomes. A deviation of the outcome probabilities from equality is referred to as an “absolute bias”, and a non-random relationship between consecutive outcomes referred to as a “relative bias”.
Absolute bias results from asymmetries in the roulette wheel. These can occur due to local irregularities (dents, nicks, slight differences in the size or shape of the numbered compartments, variations in the density or hardness of the material used to make the walls between compartments) or overall deviations (warping or deviations from circularity; unbalanced mounting so the wheel is not completely level).
The different sources of absolute bias will tend to result in different patterns of non-randomness in the outcome probabilities. These sources of absolute bias include:
1) A wheel which is not mounted levelly will show a circular or “dipole” variation in the probabilities, with one half of the wheel being more likely than the other half, and the highest-probability and lowest probability numbers being concentrated in opposite regions of the wheel.
2) A wheel which is warped, and so slightly elliptical rather than circular in shape, will show a quadruple variation in the probabilities, with the higher probability numbers concentrated in opposite regions of the wheel corresponding to one axis of the ellipse, and the lower probability numbers concentrated in the complementary regions corresponding to the other axis of the ellipse.
3) A wheel which was manufactured to loose tolerances or assembled with insufficient precision will tend to have many numbers with small deviations from the uniform probabilities.
4) A wheel which has been in operation for a long time and suffers from wear and tear will tend to have a few numbers with significant deviations from the uniform probabilities.
5) A wheel which has suffered some accident or external blow or tampering will tend to have a single number with a large deviation from the uniform probabilities.
Even when a roulette wheel is perfectly symmetrical and physically balanced, so that over time all numbers occur with equal probability, relative biases related to correlations between consecutive spins may occur. These are caused by insufficient variability in three continuous quantities determining roulette outcomes: rotational velocity of the wheel, speed with which the ball is released, and timing of the ball release relative to when the ball was removed from the slot it fell into on the previous spin. Too much uniformity in these variables will result in the quantity “total number of revolutions the ball makes” having a sufficiently non-uniform distribution that the relative angle between the outcome from the previous spin and the outcome from the current spin is also nonuniform in a detectable way.
Thus, the biases typically found in roulette wheels: 1) Bias due to irregularities in individual compartments or locations on the wheel; and 2) Bias due to an overall imbalance or asymmetry in the wheel's rotation (which may come from either imperfect manufacture or inaccurate installation) or, because of wear and tear on the wheel over time (e.g., people bumping into the wheel, vibrations, etc) causes drifting away from equal probabilities. The first kind of bias affects individual number bets. The second bias affects multiple number bets with “regions” of the wheel rather than individual numbers deviating from the expected probability. However, the second bias has a greater impact on the multiple number bets.
It would be highly desirable to provide a Roulette wheel apparatus, and a method for arranging indicia on a Roulette wheel that is more balanced than the prior art (standard) Roulette wheels such that the impact of the bias in the physical wheel is minimized.
It would be further highly desirable to provide a Roulette wheel apparatus, and a method for arranging indicia on a Roulette wheel that is more balanced than the prior art (standard) Roulette wheels, such that the impact of the second bias in the physical wheel is minimized.
It would be further desirable to provide a Roulette wheel apparatus, and a method for arranging indicia on a 36 number balanced Roulette wheel that is more balanced than the prior art (standard) Roulette wheels, such that the impact of the bias in the physical wheel is minimized by reducing impact of a biased wheel on the House Edge for various types of betting arrangements.
It would be further desirable to provide a Roulette wheel apparatus, and a method for arranging indicia on a 36 number balanced Roulette wheel to reduce the impact of a biased wheel on multi-number bets, by spreading the physical location of the numbers in a multi-number bet more evenly around the roulette wheel.
It would be further desirable to provide a Roulette wheel apparatus, and a method for arranging indicia on a 36 number balanced Roulette wheel to minimize the impact of bias on combinations of multi-number bets.
The present invention includes an improved roulette wheel game and apparatus of a “balanced” arrangement such that an impact of a biased wheel on the House Edge is reduced.
The present invention includes a first balanced roulette wheel apparatus that contains 36 numbers, excluding the house numbers, and a corresponding surface game board.
The present invention includes a first balanced roulette wheel apparatus that contains 60 numbers, excluding those house numbers, and a corresponding surface game board.
In both 36 number and 60 number embodiments, indicia on a game surface are associated with the corresponding roulette wheel type. The indicia on the game surface include all of the whole numbers on the roulette wheel arranged in numerical order, wherein one half of the whole numbers are associated with a first color and the remaining half are associated with a second color. The whole numbers are arranged on the game surface in columns and rows in ascending order beginning from a top left corner and proceeding from left to right across the rows. The whole numbers are arranged on the game surface such that the amount of whole numbers in each column is the same, and the amount of whole numbers in each row is the same. However, the number of rows may or may not be equal to the number of columns, and the number of whole numbers in the columns may or may not be equal to the number of whole numbers in the rows. The whole numbers in the game surface may be further grouped. But each grouping must contain the same number of whole numbers. But, the number of groups may or may not equal the number of rows or the number of columns. Further, the amount of whole numbers in each group may be the same or different from either the amount of whole numbers in each row or the amount of whole numbers in each column.
If the roulette wheel contains house numbers, the game surface indicia may or may not contain the house numbers. If house numbers are included in the game surface, they are arranged in an area separate from the indicia of whole numbers.
Excluding the house numbers, the number of whole numbers on the roulette wheel cannot be a prime number. In addition, the number of whole numbers on the roulette wheel is a number, which is an even number. Further, it is a number, which is evenly divisible by the number of columns and rows described hereinabove on the game surface. In an embodiment, the whole numbers on the game surface are divisible by 3, 4 or 5.
However, no matter how large the amount of whole numbers there are on the roulette wheel, no two adjacent numbers on the roulette wheel are associated with the same color, or are disposed adjacent one another on the game surface.
Thus, in one aspect, there is provided a method for arranging indicia on a game surface and on an associated roulette wheel for a roulette game, the method comprising the steps of:
Further to this embodiment, the method includes further arranging the whole numbers on the roulette wheel such that:
Further to this embodiment, each non-house whole number and a corresponding non-house whole disposed substantially diametrically opposite said non-house whole number are adjacent each other in a single column disposed in one of said first, second, or third groups.
Further to this embodiment, each non-house whole number and a corresponding non-house whole disposed substantially diametrically opposite said non-house whole number are the same color.
Further to this embodiment, the Balanced roulette wheel numbers are arranged in the following clockwise sequence: an optional house number, 18, 24, 11, 5, 30, 36, 23, 17, 4, 10, 35, 29, 16, 22, 3, 9, 28, 34, an optional house number, 15, 21, 8, 2, 27, 33, 20, 14, 1, 7, 32, 26, 13, 19, 6, 12, 25 and 31, with the house numbers being present being present between any two numbers. However, in an embodiment if the roulette wheel contain an even number of house numbers or if it contains an odd number of house numbers and the number of non-house numbers are divisible by the number of house numbers they are separated by the same number of non-house numbers so that they are arranged symmetrically on the wheel. For example, in an embodiment, a first non-house number is between 18 and 31 and a second house number is between 34 and 15.
In a further embodiment, there is provided a roulette game apparatus comprising:
In a further embodiment, there is provided a method for arranging indicia on a game surface and on an associated roulette wheel for a Super roulette game, the method comprising:
Further to this embodiment, the method comprises further arranging said whole numbers on the roulette wheel such that:
Further to this embodiment, each non-house whole number and a corresponding non-house whole disposed substantially diametrically opposite said non-house whole number are adjacent each other in a single column disposed in one of said first, second, or third groups.
Further to this embodiment, each non-house whole number and a corresponding non-house whole disposed substantially diametrically opposite said non-house whole number are the same color.
Further to this embodiment, as with the other roulette wheels, the house numbers can separate any two numbers. However, if the number of house numbers are even or if the number of non-house numbers are divisible by the number of house numbers, then the house numbers are arranged in a symmetrical fashion on the roulette wheel. For example, if there are three house numbers, they are provided on the wheel evenly distributed about the circumference of said wheel such that 20 non-house numbers are present between any two house numbers.
Further to this embodiment, the roulette wheel numbers are arranged in the following clockwise sequence: an optional house number, 55, 45, 24, 34, 13, 3, 42, 52, 31, 21, 20, 10, 49, 59, 38, 28, 7, 17, 56, 46, an optional house number, 35, 25, 4, 14, 53, 43, 22, 32, 11, 1, 60, 50, 29, 39, 18, 8, 47, 57, 36, 26, an optional house number, 15, 5, 44, 54, 33, 23, 2, 12, 51, 41, 40, 30, 9, 19, 58, 48, 27, 37, 16, 6. If there are three house numbers, they are distributed evenly around the wheel, for example, in an embodiment, between 55 and 6, 46 and 33 and 26 and 15.
In a further aspect, there is provided a roulette game apparatus comprising:
Advantageously, the method for arranging indicia on a Balanced Roulette Wheel and Balanced Super Roulette Wheel game surface and on an associated Balanced Wheel and Balanced Super Roulette Wheel game surfaces that reduce the impact of wheel Bias that affects payouts for multi-number bets (e.g., 4-number bets or more).
An advantage of a method for arranging indicia on a Balanced roulette game surface and on an associated Balanced roulette wheel and of roulette game apparatuses according to embodiments of the invention is that the relationships between adjacent numbers on the prior art roulette wheel and their corresponding characteristics and positions on the prior art game surface are eliminated or minimized. The game surface and Balanced roulette wheel arrangements according to embodiments of the invention minimizes the effect of the second bias associated with the wheel that affects groups of numbers such that players using are unable to take advantage of the relationship between the positions of the numbers on the prior art roulette wheel and the betting combinations available on the prior art game surface to increase their odds of winning.
The game surface and wheel arrangements according to embodiments of the invention achieve fairness, balance and consistency for the player and casino by providing a perfect balance of red, black, odd and even numbers on the game surface and a roulette wheel layout which is matched to a corresponding game surface or board to eliminate relationships between groups of numbers on the wheel and betting arrangements on the game surface and further minimizes the effect of any bias associated with the wheel that affects groups of numbers.
A further advantage of a super roulette wheel arrangement according to a method and apparatus of the invention is that an arrangement may be provided that is adaptable for both American and European use with a common game surface have substantially the same arrangement of numbers. This feature may increase player interest, as players familiar with one of the American or European roulette wheel arrangement will also be easily familiarized with the other style wheel.
Other benefits and features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description considered in connection with the accompanying drawings. It is to be understood, however, that the drawings are designed as an illustration only and not as a definition of the limits of the invention.
In the drawings, wherein similar reference characters denote similar elements:
In the drawings, numbers and symbols in regular typeface indicate a first color, for example red. Numbers and symbols in bold typeface indicate a second color, for example black. Numbers in an outline type format indicate a third color, for example green.
A first embodiment of the present application refers to a “Balanced” roulette wheel apparatus containing 36 whole numbers thereon that ameliorates and at best eliminates effects of bias due to an overall imbalance or asymmetry in the wheel's rotation (which affects multiple numbers at a time in affected “regions” on the wheel surface).
Balanced Roulette Wheel
As used herein, the terms “substantially diametrically opposite”, “substantially diametrically opposed and “substantially diametrically” are synonymous and mean that the numbers on the roulette wheel are separated by the number of non-house number on the roulette wheel divided by two ±1 non-house numbers. For example, in the roulette wheel of 36 non-house numbers, if the roulette wheel contains two house numbers which are “substantially diametrically opposite”, this means that the two house numbers are separated by 18±1 house numbers, e.g., 18 non-house numbers. In the wheel of 60 non-house numbers, if the roulette wheel contains two house numbers which are “substantially diametrically opposite”, this means that the two house numbers are separated by 30 non-house numbers. It is to be noted that a roulette wheel of 36 non-house numbers, the non-house numbers which are substantially diametrically opposite are separated by 17 non-house numbers. On the other hand, on a roulette wheel of 60 non-house numbers, the non-house numbers which are substantially diametrically opposite are separated by 29 non-house numbers.
The term “group” refers to the division of roulette board into 3 groups. If it contains 36 non-house numbers, Group I is Numbers 1-12, Group 2 contains Numbers 13-24 and the third group contains numbers 25-36. If these roulette wheel contains 60 non-house numbers the first group contains numbers 1-20 the second group contains numbers 21-40, the third group contains numbers 41-60.
In an embodiment of the present invention, as shown in
It is noted that in
As shown in
Moreover, each of the three columns in the game surface 50 comprises six numbers associated with the first color and six numbers associated with the second color. For example, each of the columns in the game surface of
Additionally, each of the three groups of twelve numbers corresponding to the first, second and third dozen wagering areas 66, 67, 68 in the game surface of
For example, as shown in the game surface 50 illustrated in
Each of the pockets 76 correspond to either a house number 0 and 00 for the American wheel (0 for the European wheel) that are evenly spaced apart (diametrically opposed on the periphery of wheel) or, to one of the whole numbers from 1 to 36. Each of the whole numbers on the wheel is associated with a first color or a second color conforming to the association of numbers and colors on a game surface to be used with the particular wheel.
In the Balanced American roulette game apparatus 10 comprising game board surface and roulette wheel embodiments depicted in
Furthermore, the pockets and corresponding numbers on the Balanced American roulette wheel are arranged such that each pair of numbers disposed “substantially diametrically across” from one another on the roulette wheel is disposed in the same group on the game surface and in the same column on the game surface. The phrase substantially diametrically across from one another refers to two numbers which are disposed on the roulette wheel opposite one another along a diameter of the wheel (or, in the case of 38 number Roulette American Roulette wheel having two (2) house numbers), separated by 17 non-house numbers in succession between. For example, for a 36-number wheel such as shown in
As shown in
A method of arranging the thirty-six whole numbers (indicia) on the roulette wheel in a circumferential manner according to one embodiment of the invention is by: selecting a first whole number associated with the first color (e.g., black 25) and selecting a second whole number associated with the second color (e.g., red 31), the first and second whole numbers being disposed in a single column (e.g., first column) of the three columns on the game board and disposed in a third group of the three groups (e.g., 3rd group), and indicating the first whole number and second whole number on the roulette wheel. Then, there is further selected a first further whole number associated with the first color (e.g., black 18) and selecting a first further whole number associated with the second color (e.g. red 24), the first further whole number of the first color and first further whole number of the second color disposed in a single column (e.g., third column) of the three columns and disposed in a second group of the three groups (e.g., 2nd group), and indicating the first further whole number of the first color and first further whole number of the second color on the roulette wheel adjacent to one of: the first whole number or second whole number. Then, there is selected a second further whole number associated with the first color (e.g., black 11) and selecting a second further whole number associated with the second color (e.g. red 5), the second further first and second whole numbers disposed in a single column (e.g., second column) of the three columns and disposed in a third group of the three groups (e.g., 1st group), and indicating the second further whole number of the first color and second further whole number of the second color on the roulette wheel adjacent to one of the first further whole number of the first or second color. This selection of two numbers of different colors from each column/group combination is repeated as a first pattern on the Balanced roulette wheel of
That is, in Balanced roulette wheel arrangement shown in
It is further understood that, in this method, the first two selected first whole (non-house) number associated with the first color and selected second whole number associated with the second color may be selected from any group or column, as long as the repeating pattern conforms to the Group and Columns of the corresponding game board surface 50 as shown above.
In the repeating pattern of the embodiment described, it is noted that each selected first whole number, first further whole number and second further whole numbers associated with the first color (e.g., black 25, 18, 11, 30 . . . ) are disposed 6 numbers apart on the game surface from the corresponding respective selected second whole number, first further whole number, and second further whole number associated with the second color (e.g., red 31, 24, 5, 36 . . . ).
In this embodiment, the whole numbers on the Balanced American roulette wheel are being selected and arranged such that: a first pair 98 of adjacent non-house numbers (e.g., numbers 28 black, 9 red) on the wheel sum to 37, and, a second pair 97 of adjacent non-house numbers (e.g., numbers 25 black, 12 red) on the wheel located substantially diametrically opposite the first pair of adjacent numbers on the wheel sum to 37, and such that: a first non-house number (e.g., 34 red) immediately adjacent one number (e.g., 28) of the first pair 98 indicated on the wheel in a first clockwise (CW) direction labeled “A”, and, a corresponding positioned second non-house number (e.g., 3 black) immediately adjacent the other number (e.g., 9) of the first pair (i.e., in corresponding like position) indicated on the wheel in a second counter-clockwise (CCW) direction labeled “B” sum to 37. Thus, a second pattern is repeated on the wheel such that, each successive non-house whole number on the wheel proceeding in the first CW direction “A” between the first non-house number (e.g., 34 red) and the second pair 97 of adjacent numbers (e.g., numbers 15, 21, 8, 2, 27, 33, 20, 14, 1, 7, 32, 26, 13, 19, 6) and a corresponding like-positioned successive non-house whole number on the wheel proceeding in the second counter-clockwise (CCW) direction “B” from the second non-house number (e.g., 3 black) and the second pair 97 of adjacent numbers (e.g., numbers 22, 16, 29, 35, 10, 4, 17, 23, 36, 30, 5, 11, 24, 18, 31) sum to 37.
In the Balanced Roulette wheel arrangement of
Further, according to Balanced American roulette wheel arrangement shown in
Further, according to Balanced wheel arrangement shown in
The sequence of numbers on the Balanced European style roulette wheel is substantially the same as the sequence of numbers on a Balanced American style wheel such as shown in
The Balanced American Roulette Wheel has two house numbers, which are located opposite one another. There are 18 non-house numbers separating them, but the house numbers can be placed anywhere on the roulette wheel. However, in one embodiment, the house numbers are placed on the roulette wheel so as it not break up a pair in the same group. Thus, for example, in
Further, in an embodiment, the house numbers are arranged so that one group of the pattern is on one side and the other two groups of the pattern are on the other side of the house number. For example, in
The same is true with the European wheel. It has only one house number. In one embodiment as in the American wheel, the house number is placed so as to not to break up the pair. In this embodiment, it is placed between pairs. Further, in another embodiment, it is placed such that one group of the pattern is on one side of the house number and the other two groups are on the other side of the house number. In another embodiment, the house number is placed so that it does not break up a pair and such that one group of the pattern is on one side of the house number and the other two groups of the pattern is on the other side of the house number.
In demonstrating the advantageous effect of the Balanced Roulette wheel embodiment with respect to a physical bias that may affect regions of numbers, the Roulette wheel was modeled and various multi-number type bets of the types described herein, simulated using the model. To model this, it is assumed that the Roulette wheel is biased in a way that makes one half of the wheel more likely and the other half less likely. Thus, it is assumed that within each half, the probabilities of all numbers are equal. (In the case of a European wheel with an odd number of compartments, the boundary between the more likely and less likely halves passes through the middle of one of the compartments, which is assumed to be unbiased.)
For each multi-number bet, the distribution of the numbers between the “heavy half” and the “light half” of the wheel was calculated, averaging over all bets and all ways of splitting the wheel into two halves, for the Standard Roulette wheel layout (shown in
First there is enumerated all wheel bias possibilities, e.g., the possible ways of dividing a roulette wheel in half (e.g., 37 different ways for the standard roulette), then for each (multi-number) bet, counting how many numbers end up in ½ of the wheel e.g. a “light” half, and how many numbers end up in a “heavy” half, for the wheel described herein in
There are six even-money (18-number) bets and six 2:1 (12-number) bets on the table layout: with Even money bets corresponding to a bet of: a Red number, Black number, Even number, Odd number, first group numbers 1-18, and second group numbers 19-36 and the six 2:1 bets comprising:
In the following Tables below, the indicated percentages refer to the probability that, when the wheel is biased, the numbers involved in the bet will be split between the “heavy” and “light” halves of the wheel (e.g., standard American) as indicated. Thus, for even money bets (18 numbers), an indicated 9:9 split means that the wheel's bias does not affect the return of the bet. For 2:1 bets (12 numbers), a 6:6 split indicated in the table means that the wheel's bias does not affect the return of the bet.
For example, as follows, shown in Table IA, the model simulation produces the following “Average” over all even number bets (i.e., 18 numbers, including betting on black or red) for the standard American Roulette wheel depicted in
For example, as follows, shown in Table IIA, the model simulation produces the following “Average” over all 2:1 bets (i.e., 12-number bets) for the standard American Roulette wheel depicted in
From these example simulation results, shown in Tables IA, IB, IIA, JIB it is clear that the “Balanced” layouts are less likely to have many numbers in the “heavy” half of the wheel, and more likely to be evenly split so that the return of the bet will be unaffected.
For bets on fewer numbers, there is also an improvement from using the Balanced layout. For example, as follows, shown in Table IIIA, the model simulation produces the following “Average” over all 5:1 bets (6 numbers: there are 11 of these bets, 1-6, 4-9, 7-12, . . . , 31-36) for the standard American Roulette wheel depicted in
For example, as follows, shown in Table IVA, the model simulation produces the following “Average” over all 8:1 bets (4 numbers; there are 22 of these bets) for the standard American Roulette wheel depicted in
As depicted in the Tables above, it is clear that an advantage of the Balanced Roulette wheel (American and European versions) embodiment depicted in
That is, the “Balanced” layouts are less likely to have many numbers in the “heavy” half of the wheel, and more likely to be evenly split so that the return of the bet will be unaffected.
Even when multi-number bets are concentrated in one region of the wheel, it is possible for a badly balanced wheel to cause the odds to unfairly favor the player or the house. However, the balanced layouts in the embodiments of the Balanced Roulette wheel (American and European versions) minimize the potential unfairness.
Balanced Super Roulette Wheel
While the game of roulette has always been restricted to a game having about 36 numbers on the wheel and one or two house numbers designated as 0 or 00 or both, a Balanced Super Roulette wheel and game surface arrangements is provided that is a variation of Roulette played with a wheel having up to 63 compartments labeled with the non-house numbers 1 through 60 and also optional house numbers 0, 00, 000 and 0000 and is played like ordinary Roulette. There is a spinning wheel containing compartments for the numbers 0 through 60 (with optional additional “0”, “00” “000” and “0000” compartments), and a ball which rotates around the rim of the wheel until it falls into one of the compartments. There is a table layout which allows the player to place bets on individual numbers or combinations of numbers. On the layout, each number is colored red or black (except, for example, 0, 00, and 000 which are green).
According to a further embodiment of the invention, the Balanced Super roulette game includes a Balanced Super Roulette wheel having 60 whole numbers and a corresponding Balanced Super roulette game board surface indicating 60 individual number wagering areas. As shown in
As shown in
Moreover, each of the five columns in the game board surface 100 according to an embodiment of the invention comprises six numbers associated with the first color and six numbers associated with the second color. Each of the columns in the game surface according to this embodiment of the invention comprises six odd numbers and six even numbers. Each of the columns in a game surface according to an embodiment of the invention comprises three even numbers associated with the first color, three even numbers associated with the second color, three odd numbers associated with the first color and three odd numbers associated with the second color.
Additionally, each of the three groups of twenty numbers corresponding to the first, second and third other wagering areas 116, 117, 118 in the game surface according to an embodiment of the invention comprises five even numbers associated with the first color, five even numbers associated with the second color, five odd numbers associated with the first color and five odd numbers associated with the second color.
For example, as shown in the game surface illustrated in
It is noted that in
Winning wagers in the Balanced Super Roulette wheel game are paid out at predetermined multiples based on the probability of the particular predicted outcome. In the Balanced Super Roulette wheel game, for example, there are six (6) even money bets that pay out at a ratio of 1:1 including a selection of a Red number, a Black number, an Even number, an Odd number, or number groups 1-30 or 31-60; there are three (3) 20-number bets that pay out at 2:1 on a block of twenty consecutive numbers (first twenty numbers 1 to 20), second twenty from 21 to 40 or last twenty for the combination of numbers 41 to 60. Other wager combinations and associated payout ratios may also be used. For example, there are five (5) 12-number bets that pay out at 4:1 (a winning wager for a column (e.g., 1st column numbers 1, 6, 11, 16, 21, 26, 31, 36, 41, 46, 51, 56, 2nd column numbers 2, 7, 12, 17, 22, 27, 32, 37, 42, 47, 52, 57, 3rd column numbers 3, 8, 13, 18, 23, 28, 33, 38, 43, 48, 53, 58, 4th column numbers 4, 9, 14, 19, 24, 29, 34, 39, 44, 49, 54, 59 or 5th column numbers 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60). There are eleven 10-number bets that that pay out at 5:1 (a winning wager for a group of ten adjacent numbers 1-10, 6-15, 11-20, 16-25, 21-30, 26-35, 31-40, 36-45, 41-50, 46-55, 51-60. There are twelve 5-number bets that that pay out at 11:1 (a winning wager for a group of five adjacent numbers 1-5, 6-10, 11-15, 16-20, 21-25, 26-30, 31-35, 36-40, 41-45, 46-50, 51-55, 56-60. There are further forty-four (44) 4-number bets on the table layout that pay out at 14:1 (a winning wager for each combination of four adjacent numbers 1-2-6-7, 2-3-7-8, 3-4-8-9, 4-5-9-10, 6-7-11-12, 7-8-12-13, 8-9-13-14, 9-10-14-15, 11-12-16-17, 12-13-17-18, 13-14-18-19, 14-15-19-20, 16-17-21-22, 17-18-22-23, 18-19-23-24, 19-20-24-25, 21-22-26-27, 22-23-27-28, 23-24-28-29, 24-25-29-30, 26-27-31-32, 27-28-32-33, 28-29-33-34, 29-30-34-35, 31-32-36-37, 32-33-37-38, 33-34-38-39, 34-35-39-40, 36-37-41-42, 37-38-42-43, 38-39-43-44, 39-40-44-45, 41-42-46-47. 42-43-47-48, 43-44-48-49, 44-45-49-50, 46-47-51-52, 47-48-52-53, 48-49-53-54, 49-50-54-55, 51-52-56-57, 52-53-57-58, 53-54-58-59 and 54-55-59-60.
As shown in
According to this embodiment of the invention, the pockets and corresponding numbers on the Balanced Super roulette wheel 175 are arranged such that no two adjacent numbers on the roulette wheel are associated with a same color, are disposed in a same row on an associated game surface, or are disposed adjacent one another on an associated game surface. In terms of the game surface, two adjacent numbers may be considered as two numbers which are directly above or below one another (for example 4 and 9), side by side (for example 7 and 8) or directly diagonal from one another (for example 10 and 4).
Furthermore, the pockets and corresponding numbers on the Balanced Super roulette wheel 175 are arranged such that each pair of numbers disposed substantially diametrically across from one another on the roulette wheel is disposed in the same group on the game surface and in the same column on the game surface. The phrase substantially diametrically across from one another refers to two numbers which are disposed on the roulette wheel opposite one another along a diameter of the wheel (or, in the case of 60 number Super Roulette wheel (not counting any house numbers) separated by 29 numbers in succession between). For example, for a 60-number wheel such as shown in
As shown in
A method of arranging the sixty whole numbers (indicia) on the Balanced Super Roulette wheel 175 of
This selection of two numbers of different colors from a column/group combination is repeated as a first pattern on the Balanced roulette wheel such that no two adjacent non-house numbers on the roulette wheel are associated with a same color, are disposed in a same row on the game surface, and are disposed adjacent one another on the game surface.
That is, in Balanced roulette wheel arrangement shown in
As shown in
It is further understood that, in this method, the two selected first whole (non-house) number associated with the first color and selected second whole number associated with the second color may be first selected from any group or column, as long as the repeating pattern conforms to the Group and Columns of the corresponding game board surface 100 as shown above.
In the repeating pattern of the embodiment described, it is noted that each selected first whole number, first further whole number, second further whole number, third further whole number and fourth further whole number associated with the first color (e.g., black 16, 27, 58, 9, 40 . . . ) are disposed 10 numbers apart on the game surface from the corresponding respective selected second whole number, first further whole number, second further whole number, third further whole number and fourth further whole number associated with the second color (e.g., red 6, 37, 48, 19, 30 . . . ).
Further to this Balanced Super Roulette embodiment, in view of
Further, according to Balanced Super Roulette wheel arrangement shown in
Further, according to Balanced Super Roulette wheel arrangement shown in
Just as with the Standard balanced Roulette wheel containing 36 numbers, in an embodiment, the house numbers cannot break up a pair. For example, the house numbers do not break up a pair of adjacent non-house numbers on the roulette wheel which are in the same group and the same column on the game surface. For example, as depicted in
For purposes of demonstrating the advantageous effect of the Balanced Super Roulette wheel 175 of
For each multi-number bet, the distribution of the numbers between the “heavy half” and the “light half” of the wheel was calculated, averaging over all bets and all ways of splitting the wheel into two halves, for a comparative Super Roulette wheel layout to be described below, and for the Balanced Super Roulette wheel layout shown in
Since there are no Standard Super Roulette wheels, for purposes of comparison, another arrangement, that is, one arrangement of a “Comparative” Super Roulette wheel layout 200 was prepared. This wheel layout was for purposes of determining an effect of the balanced arrangement of indicia in the Balanced Super Roulette wheel (with omission of one or two house numbers)) layout shown in
Thus, as shown in
To model this, it is assumed that a Super Roulette wheel is biased in a way that makes one half of the wheel more likely and the other half less likely. It is further assumed that within each half the probabilities of all numbers are equal. Since the Super roulette wheel has an odd number of compartments, the boundary between the more likely and less likely halves passes through the middle of one of the compartments, which is assumed to be unbiased. For each multi-number bet, there is calculated the distribution of the numbers between the “heavy half” and the “light half” of the wheel, averaging over all bets and all ways of splitting the Super roulette wheel into two halves, for the “Comparative” Super and “New” Balanced Super layouts. As mentioned above, there are six even-money (30-number) bets, three 2:1 (20-number) bets, five 4:1 (12-number) bets, eleven 5:1 (10-number) bets, twelve 11:1 (5-number) bets, and forty-four 14:1 (4-number) bets on the Super Roulette game surface 100 layout.
The following percentages refer to the probability that, when the wheel is biased, the numbers involved in the bet will be split between the “heavy” and “light” halves of the wheel as indicated. For even money bets (30 numbers), a 15:15 split means that the wheel's bias does not affect the return of the bet. For 2:1 bets (20 numbers), a 10:10 split means that the wheel's bias does not affect the return of the bet. For 4:1 bets (12 numbers), a 6:6 split means that the wheel's bias does not affect the return of the bet. For 5:1 bets (10 numbers), a 5:5 split means that the wheel's bias does not affect the return of the bet. For 11:1 bets (5 numbers), the best achievable split is 3:2, which minimizes the effect of the wheel's bias. For 14:1 bets (4 numbers), a 2:2 split means that the wheel's bias does not affect the return of the bet.
Balanced Roulette Wheel:
The odds for Balanced Roulette are the same as the odds for Standard Roulette (a House Edge of 1/37, or 2.70%, for European wheels, and a House Edge of 2/38, or 5.26%, of American wheels). Balanced American and European Roulette and Super Roulette wheels also reduce the impact of a bias in the physical wheel on the return of multi-number bets that pay even money (18-number bets) 2:1 (12-number bets), 5:1 (6-number bets), and 8:1 (4-number bets) compared with Standard Roulette wheels. The table below shows, for each configuration, based on mathematical simulations applied, the probability of a bet having the indicated deviation from perfect balance (so that 0 means exactly half the number in the bet are in the “heavy” half of the wheel, +1 means that there is 1 additional number in that half of the wheel, etc.)
Moreover, a further advantage is provided in the balanced roulette wheel apparatus designed according to the methodology described herein, in that the impact of biased wheel on combinations of multi-numbers bets is minimized.
The Balanced Roulette arrangements described herein minimizes this imbalance for multi-number bets relative to the American and European roulette wheels. For example, the American and European arrangements have additional patterns related to combinations of multi-number bets, as follows: In the European arrangement, each of the following four combinations has all 9 numbers in the same half of the wheel, on one or the other side of a house number, e.g., on the right side of 0, the black #'s (1-18) are 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11, 13, 15, 17, and the Red #'s (19-36) are 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 30, 32, 34 and 36. On the left side of the 0, the Red #'s of (1-18) are 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 14, 16, 18 and the Black #'s of (19-36) are 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 29, 31, 33 and 36. 0: Black 1-18, Red 1-18, Black 19-36, and Red 19-36. In the American arrangement, each of the four combinations has all 9 numbers in the same half of the wheel, on one or the other side of a house number, e.g., on the right side of 0, the odd #'s of 1-18 are 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 in Red, and 11, 13, 15, 17 in Black and the even numbers of 19-36 are 20, 22, 24, 26, 28 in Black and 30, 32, 34 and 36 in Red, while on the left side of the 0, the even numbers (1-18) are 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 in Black, 12, 14, 16, 18 in Red and the odd #'s of 19-36 are 19, 21, 23, 25, 27 in Red and 29, 31, 33 and 35 in Black. Bets on these combinations would be strongly affected by either a bias favoring one side of the wheel over the other, or the ability of a croupier to exercise some control over the region of the wheel selected by adjusting the speed of the ball release. The balanced arrangement does not have this pattern. For each combination of two independent 18-number bets, the 9 numbers in both bets are distributed around the wheel rather than concentrated in one half of the wheel.
The only 18 number bet, which are perfectly evenly distributed are the Red and Black bets. Although it is impossible to make all multi-number bets perfectly evenly distributed around the wheel, the Balanced Roulette arrangements minimize this imbalance for multi-number bets.
Besides the reduction in bias on the wheel, the present invention provides a more balanced layout on the game surface relative to the standard layout for the 36 number non-house roulette game. For example, in the game surface, a balanced bet has the lowest correlation with the Red and Black even money bet outcome, and the largest degree of independence from color value. There are 45 multi-number bets of 4 or more numbers on the roulette game. They are depicted below
As seen, there is approximately a 7% advantage on the balanced bets in the Balanced Layout relative to the standard layout while with respect to the unbalanced bets, the standard layout has about a 7% disadvantage relative to the balanced layout.
Thus, the present arrangement minimizes the bias on the roulette wheel and provides for a more balanced betting arrangement on the game surface.
Balanced Super Roulette Wheel:
For the 30-number even money bets, 20-number 2:1 bets, and 12-number 4:1 bets, the “Comparative” Super Roulette and New Balanced Super Roulette wheel of the embodiment of the invention described herein arrangement of numbers around the wheel are equally well-balanced. Assuming one half of the wheel is favored over the other half, the 12-number and 20-number bets are perfectly balanced, and the 30-number bets are perfectly balanced 90.5% of the time and minimally unbalanced (16:14) 9/5% of the time.
For 10-number 5:1 bets, 5-number 11:1 bets, and 4-number 14:1 bets, the New Balanced Super Roulette wheel of the embodiment described herein distributes the numbers around the wheel in a much more balanced way than the “Comparative” Super Roulette arrangement. That is, 10-number bets are split evenly 5:5 83.3% of the time in the New Balanced Super Roulette arrangement, compared with 60.5% of the time in the “Comparative” Super Roulette arrangement. In the New Balanced Super Roulette arrangement, the worst balance for any bet is a 7:3 split, while in the “Comparative” Super Roulette arrangement 21.1% of the time there is a split of 8:2, 9:1, or 10:0 between opposite halves of the wheel.
Further, it is seen that 5-number bets have the best possible 3:2 split 80.9% of the time in the New Balanced Super Roulette arrangement, compared with 41.8% of the time in the “Comparative” Super Roulette arrangement. In the New Balanced Super Roulette arrangement, 5-number bets never have a 5:0 split, while this occurs 25.4% of the time in the “Comparative” Super Roulette arrangement.
With respect to 4-number bets, these are split evenly 2:2 85.9% of the time in the New Balanced Super Roulette arrangement, compared with 69.8% of the time in the “Comparative” Super Roulette arrangement. In the New Balanced Super Roulette arrangement, 4:0 splits occur 0.6% of the time, while this occurs 15.2% of the time in the “Comparative” Super Roulette arrangement.
Accordingly, while several embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it is obvious that many changes and modifications may be made thereunto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4077631 | Tela, Sr. | Mar 1978 | A |
5540442 | Orselli et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
6059659 | Busch et al. | May 2000 | A |
6302395 | Astaneha | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6352260 | Santiago | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6406021 | Nadibaidze | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406022 | Nadibaidze | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6467770 | Matosevic | Oct 2002 | B1 |
7571910 | Launzel | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7588250 | Sorge | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7637503 | Sorge | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7694971 | Sorge | Apr 2010 | B2 |
20070222145 | Sorge | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080224393 | Sorge | Sep 2008 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Apr. 27, 2012 issued in International Application No. PCT/US2011/050914. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120061912 A1 | Mar 2012 | US |