Patent Grant
9669851
Embodiments of the subject matter disclosed herein relate to examining routes traveled by vehicles.
Routes that are traveled by vehicles may become damaged over time with extended use. For example, tracks on which rail vehicles travel may become damaged and/or broken. A variety of known systems are used to examine rail tracks to identify where the damaged and/or broken portions of the track are located. For example, some systems use cameras, lasers, and the like, to optically detect breaks and damage to the tracks. The cameras and lasers may be mounted on the rail vehicles, but the accuracy of the cameras and lasers may be limited by the speed at which the rail vehicles move during inspection of the route. As a result, the cameras and lasers may not be able to be used during regular operation (e.g., travel) of the rail vehicles in revenue service.
Other systems use ultrasonic transducers that are placed at or near the tracks to ultrasonically inspect the tracks. These systems may require very slow movement of the transducers relative to the tracks in order to detect damage to the track. When a suspect location is found by an ultrasonic inspection vehicle, a follow-up manual inspection may be required for confirmation of defects using transducers that are manually positioned and moved along the track and/or are moved along the track by a relatively slower moving inspection vehicle. Inspections of the track can take a considerable amount of time, during which the inspected section of the route may be unusable by regular route traffic.
Other systems use human inspectors who move along the track to inspect for broken and/or damaged sections of track. This manual inspection is slow and prone to errors.
Other systems use wayside devices that send electric signals through the tracks. If the signals are not received by other wayside devices, then a circuit that includes the track is identified as being open and the track is considered to be broken. These systems are limited at least in that the wayside devices are immobile. As a result, the systems cannot inspect large spans of track and/or a large number of devices must be installed in order to inspect the large spans of track. These systems are also limited at least in that a single circuit could stretch for multiple miles. As a result, if the track is identified as being open and is considered broken, it is difficult and time-consuming to locate the exact location of the break within the long circuit. For example, a maintainer must patrol the length of the circuit to locate the problem.
These systems are also limited at least in that other track features, such as highway (e.g., hard wire) crossing shunts, wide band (e.g., capacitors) crossing shunts, narrow band (e.g., tuned) crossing shunts, switches, insulated joints, and turnouts (e.g., track switches) may emulate the signal response expected from a broken rail and provide a false alarm. For example, scrap metal on the track, crossing shunts, etc., may short the rails together, preventing the current from traversing the length of the circuit, indicating that the circuit is open. Additionally, insulated joints and/or turnouts may include intentional conductive breaks that create an open circuit. In response, the system may identify a potentially broken section of track, and a person or machine may be dispatched to patrol the circuit to locate the break, even if the detected break is a false alarm (e.g., not a break in the track). A need remains to reduce the probability of false alarms to make route maintenance more efficient.
Some vehicles travel with the aid of positioning systems, such as global positioning system (GPS) receivers. These systems can locate where the vehicles are positioned along a route. Some routes, such as rail tracks, may be positioned relatively close together. These routes may be sufficiently close to one another that the positioning system of a vehicle is unable to determine which of two or more routes that the vehicle is located on. As a result, the positioning system may be unable to correctly identify which of several routes that the vehicle is traveling along.
In one embodiment, a method (e.g., for examining a route) includes automatically detecting (with an identification unit onboard a vehicle having one or more processors) a location of a break in conductivity of a first route during movement of the vehicle along the first route and identifying (with the identification unit) one or more of a location of the vehicle on the first route or the first route from among several different routes based at least in part on the location of the break in the conductivity of the first route that is detected.
In another embodiment, a system (e.g., a route examination system) includes an identification unit having one or more processors configured to detect a location of a break in conductivity of a first route from onboard a vehicle during movement of the vehicle along the first route. The identification unit also is configured to identify one or more of a location of the vehicle on the first route or the first route from among several different routes based at least in part on the location of the break in the conductivity of the first route that is detected.
In another embodiment, a system (e.g., a route examination system) includes a detection unit and an identification unit. The detection unit can be configured to be disposed onboard a vehicle system and to detect a change in an electrical characteristic of a first route being traveled upon by the vehicle system. The identification unit can be configured to be disposed onboard the vehicle system and to identify one or more of the first route from among several different routes or where the vehicle system is located along the first route based at least in part on the change in the electrical characteristic that is detected.
Reference is made to the accompanying drawings in which particular embodiments and further benefits of the invention are illustrated as described in more detail in the description below, in which:
Some embodiments of the subject matter described herein relate to methods and systems for examining a route being traveled by a vehicle in order to identify the route being traveled by the vehicle system. The vehicle optionally may be referred to as a vehicle system, or a vehicle system may include two or more vehicles traveling together. A route examination system onboard the vehicle or vehicle system may examine the route by injecting an electrical signal into the route from the vehicle system as the vehicle system travels along the route. The route can form part of a conductive circuit with the signal being at least partially conducted through conductive segments of the route that form part of the circuit. The examination can monitor an electrical characteristic of the route (e.g., voltage, resistance, current, resistivity, or the like) responsive to injecting the signal into the route. Based at least in part on the electrical characteristic, the examination can determine if the injected signal was or was not conducted through the route. If the injected signal was not conducted through the route or a relatively small portion of the signal was conducted, then the examination may identify an open circuit. This open circuit can indicate a break in the route (e.g., damage to a conductive portion of the route that opens the circuit) and/or the presence of an insulated joint between conductive segments of the route. For example, rails of a track may be formed from elongated conductive segments joined together by insulated, non-conducting bodies (referred to as insulated joints). The injected signal may not be able to be conducted between conductive segments joined together by the insulated joint. As a result, the open circuit detected by the examination may indicate the presence of an insulated joint in the circuit formed at least in part by the route. The examination may identify locations of the insulated joints in the route and, based on known, designated locations of the insulated joints, determine which route of several different routes that the vehicle or vehicle system is traveling along.
One or more other embodiments described herein relate to methods and systems for examining a route being traveled upon by a vehicle or vehicle system in order to identify potential sections of the route that are damaged or broken. In an embodiment, the vehicle system may examine the route by injecting an electrical signal into the route from a first vehicle in the vehicle system as the vehicle system travels along the route and monitoring the route at another, second vehicle that also is in the vehicle system. Detection of the signal at the second vehicle and/or detection of changes in the signal at the second vehicle may indicate a potentially damaged (e.g., broken or partially broken) section of the route between the first and second vehicles. In an embodiment, the route may be a track of a rail vehicle system and the first and second vehicle may be used to identify a broken or partially broken section of one or more rails of the track. The electrical signal that is injected into the route may be powered by an onboard energy storage device, such as one or more batteries, and/or an off-board energy source, such as a catenary and/or electrified rail of the route. When the damaged section of the route is identified, one or more responsive actions may be initiated. For example, the vehicle system may automatically slow down or stop. As another example, a warning signal may be communicated (e.g., transmitted or broadcast) to one or more other vehicle systems to warn the other vehicle systems of the damaged section of the route, to one or more wayside devices disposed at or near the route so that the wayside devices can communicate the warning signals to one or more other vehicle systems. In another example, the warning signal may be communicated to an off-board facility that can arrange for the repair and/or further examination of the damaged section of the route.
The terms “vehicle” or “vehicle system” as used herein can be defined as a mobile machine that transports at least one of a person, people, or a cargo. For instance, a vehicle or vehicle system can be, but is not limited to being, a rail car, an intermodal container, a locomotive, a marine vessel, mining equipment, construction equipment, an automobile, and the like. A “vehicle system” includes two or more vehicles that are interconnected with each other to travel along a route. For example, a vehicle system can include two or more vehicles that are directly connected to each other (e.g., by a coupler) or that are indirectly connected with each other (e.g., by one or more other vehicles and couplers). A vehicle system can be referred to as a consist, such as a rail vehicle consist.
“Software” or “computer program” as used herein includes, but is not limited to, one or more computer readable and/or executable instructions that cause a computer or other electronic device to perform functions, actions, and/or behave in a desired manner. The instructions may be embodied in various forms such as routines, algorithms, modules or programs including separate applications or code from dynamically linked libraries. Software may also be implemented in various forms such as a stand-alone program, a function call, a servlet, an applet, an application, instructions stored in a memory, part of an operating system or other type of executable instructions. “Computer” or “processing element” or “computer device” as used herein includes, but is not limited to, any programmed or programmable electronic device that can store, retrieve, and process data. “Non-transitory computer-readable media” include, but are not limited to, a CD-ROM, a removable flash memory card, a hard disk drive, a magnetic tape, and a floppy disk. “Computer memory”, as used herein, refers to a storage device configured to store digital data or information which can be retrieved by a computer or processing element. “Controller,” “unit,” and/or “module,” as used herein, can to the logic circuitry and/or processing elements and associated software or program involved in controlling an energy storage system. The terms “signal”, “data”, and “information” may be used interchangeably herein and may refer to digital or analog forms.
The route 108 can be a body, surface, or medium on which the vehicle system 100 travels. In an embodiment, the route 108 can include or represent a body that is capable of conveying a signal between vehicles in the vehicle system 100, such as a conductive body capable of conveying an electrical signal (e.g., a direct current, alternating current, radio frequency, or other signal).
The examination system 102 can be distributed between or among two or more vehicles 104, 106 of the vehicle system 100. For example, the examination system 102 may include two or more components that operate to identify potentially damaged sections of the route 108, with at least one component disposed on each of two different vehicles 104, 106 in the same vehicle system 100. In the illustrated embodiment, the examination system 102 is distributed between or among two different vehicles 104. For example, the examination system 102 has components disposed onboard at least two of the propulsion-generating vehicles 104A, 104B, 104C. Additionally or alternatively, the examination system 102 may include components disposed onboard at least one of the non-propulsion generating vehicles 106. For example, the examination system 102 may be located onboard two or more propulsion-generating vehicles 104, two or more non-propulsion generating vehicles 106, or at least one propulsion-generating vehicle 104 and at least one non-propulsion generating vehicle 106.
Alternatively, the examination system 102 may be distributed among three or more vehicles 104, 106. Additionally or alternatively, the examination system 102 may be distributed between one or more vehicles 104 and one or more vehicles 106, and is not limited to being disposed onboard a single type of vehicle 104 or 106. As described below, in another embodiment, the examination system 102 may be distributed between a vehicle in the vehicle system and an off-board monitoring location, such as a wayside device. Alternatively, the examination system 102 may be disposed onboard a single vehicle of the vehicle system.
In operation, the vehicle system 100 travels along the route 108. A first vehicle 104 electrically injects an examination signal into the route 108. For example, the first vehicle 104A may apply a direct current, alternating current, radio frequency signal, or the like, to the route 108 as an examination signal. The examination signal propagates through or along the route 108. A second vehicle 104B or 104C may monitor one or more electrical characteristics of the route 108 when the examination signal is injected into the route 108.
In operation, during travel of the vehicle system 100 along the route 108, the examination system 102 electrically injects an examination signal into the route 108 at a first vehicle 104 or 106 (e.g., beneath the footprint of the first vehicle 104 or 106). For example, an onboard or off-board power source may be controlled to apply a direct current, alternating current, RF signal, or the like, to a track of the route 108. The examination system 102 monitors electrical characteristics of the route 108 at a second vehicle 104 or 106 of the same vehicle system 100 (e.g., beneath the footprint of the second vehicle 104 or 106) in order to determine if the examination signal is detected in the route 108. For example, the voltage, current, resistance, impedance, or other electrical characteristic of the route 108 may be monitored at the second vehicle 104, 106 in order to determine if the examination signal is detected and/or if the examination signal has been altered. If the portion of the route 108 between the first and second vehicles conducts the examination signal to the second vehicle, then the examination signal may be detected by the examination system 102. The examination system 102 may determine that the route 108 (e.g., the portion of the route 108 through which the examination signal propagated) is intact and/or not damaged.
On the other hand, if the portion of the route 108 between the first and second vehicles does not conduct the examination signal to the second vehicle (e.g., such that the examination signal is not detected in the route 108 at the second vehicle), then the examination signal may not be detected by the examination system 102. The examination system 102 may determine that the route 108 (e.g., the portion of the route 108 disposed between the first and second vehicles during the time period that the examination signal is expected or calculated to propagate through the route 108) is not intact and/or is damaged. For example, the examination system 102 may determine that the portion of a track between the first and second vehicles is broken such that a continuous conductive pathway for propagation of the examination signal does not exist. The examination system 102 can identify this section of the route as being a potentially damaged section of the route 108. In routes 108 that are segmented (e.g., such as rail tracks that may have gaps), the examination system 102 may transmit and attempt to detect multiple examination signals in order to prevent false detection of a broken portion of the route 108.
Because the examination signal may propagate relatively quickly through the route 108 (e.g., faster than a speed at which the vehicle system 100 moves), the route 108 can be examined using the examination signal when the vehicle system 100 is moving, such as transporting cargo or otherwise operating at or above a non-zero, minimum speed limit of the route 108.
Additionally or alternatively, the examination system 102 may detect one or more changes in the examination signal at the second vehicle. The examination signal may propagate through the route 108 from the first vehicle to the second vehicle. But, due to damaged portions of the route 108 between the first and second vehicles, one or more signal characteristics of the examination signal may have changed. For example, the signal-to-noise ratio, intensity, power, or the like, of the examination signal may be known or designated when injected into the route 108 at the first vehicle. One or more of these signal characteristics may change (e.g., deteriorate or decrease) during propagation through a mechanically damaged or deteriorated portion of the route 108, even though the examination signal is received (e.g., detected) at the second vehicle. The signal characteristics can be monitored upon receipt of the examination signal at the second vehicle. Based on changes in one or more of the signal characteristics, the examination system 102 may identify the portion of the route 108 that is disposed between the first and second vehicles as being a potentially damaged portion of the route 108. For example, if the signal-to-noise ratio, intensity, power, or the like, of the examination signal decreases below a designated threshold and/or decreases by more than a designated threshold decrease, then the examination system 102 may identify the section of the route 108 as being potentially damaged.
In response to identifying a section of the route 108 as being damaged or damaged, the examination system 102 may initiate one or more responsive actions. For example, the examination system 102 can automatically slow down or stop movement of the vehicle system 100. The examination system 102 can automatically issue a warning signal to one or more other vehicle systems traveling nearby of the damaged section of the route 108 and where the damaged section of the route 108 is located. The examination system 102 may automatically communicate a warning signal to a stationary wayside device located at or near the route 108 that notifies the device of the potentially damaged section of the route 108 and the location of the potentially damaged section. The stationary wayside device can then communicate a signal to one or more other vehicle systems traveling nearby of the potentially damaged section of the route 108 and where the potentially damaged section of the route 108 is located. The examination system 102 may automatically issue an inspection signal to an off-board facility, such as a repair facility, that notifies the facility of the potentially damaged section of the route 108 and the location of the section. The facility may then send one or more inspectors to check and/or repair the route 108 at the potentially damaged section. Alternatively, the examination system 102 may notify an operator of the potentially damaged section of the route 108 and the operator may then manually initiate one or more responsive actions.
The examination system 200 includes several components described below that are disposed onboard the vehicles 202, 204. For example, the illustrated embodiment of the examination system 200 includes a control unit 206, an application device 210, an onboard power source 212 (“Battery” in
The control unit 206 controls supply of electric current to the application device 210. The control unit 206 can include hardware circuitry that includes and/or is connected with one or more processors, controllers, or other electronic logic-based devices. In an embodiment, the application device 210 includes one or more conductive bodies that engage the route 108 as the vehicle system that includes the vehicle 202 travels along the route 108. For example, the application device 210 can include a conductive shoe, brush, or other body that slides along an upper and/or side surface of a track such that a conductive pathway is created that extends through the application device 210 and the track. Additionally or alternatively, the application device 210 can include a conductive portion of a wheel of the first vehicle 202, such as the conductive outer periphery or circumference of the wheel that engages the route 108 as the first vehicle 202 travels along the route 108. In another embodiment, the application device 210 may be inductively coupled with the route 108 without engaging or touching the route 108 or any component that engages the route 108.
The application device 210 is conductively coupled with the switch 224, which can represent one or more devices that control the flow of electric current from the onboard power source 212 and/or the conditioning circuits 214. The switch 224 can be controlled by the control unit 206 so that the control unit 206 can turn on or off the flow of electric current through the application device 210 to the route 108. In an embodiment, the switch 224 also can be controlled by the control unit 206 to vary one or more waveforms and/or waveform characteristics (e.g., phase, frequency, amplitude, and the like) of the current that is applied to the route 108 by the application device 210.
The onboard power source 212 represents one or more devices capable of storing electric energy, such as one or more batteries, capacitors, flywheels, and the like. Additionally or alternatively, the power source 212 may represent one or more devices capable of generating electric current, such as an alternator, generator, photovoltaic device, gas turbine, or the like. The power source 212 is coupled with the switch 224 so that the control unit 206 can control when the electric energy stored in the power source 212 and/or the electric current generated by the power source 212 is conveyed as electric current (e.g., direct current, alternating current, an RF signal, or the like) to the route 108 via the application device 210.
The conditioning circuit 214 represents one or more circuits and electric components that change characteristics of electric current. For example, the conditioning circuit 214 may include one or more inverters, converters, transformers, batteries, capacitors, resistors, inductors, and the like. In the illustrated embodiment, the conditioning circuit 214 is coupled with a connecting assembly 226 that is configured to receive electric current from an off-board source. For example, the connecting assembly 226 may include a pantograph that engages an electrified conductive pathway 228 (e.g., a catenary) extending along the route 108 such that the electric current from the catenary 228 is conveyed via the connecting assembly 226 to the conditioning circuit 214. Additionally or alternatively, the electrified conductive pathway 228 may represent an electrified portion of the route 108 (e.g., an electrified rail) and the connecting assembly 226 may include a conductive shoe, brush, portion of a wheel, or other body that engages the electrified portion of the route 108. Electric current is conveyed from the electrified portion of the route 108 through the connecting assembly 226 and to the conditioning circuit 214.
The electric current that is conveyed to the conditioning circuit 214 from the power source 212 and/or the off-board source (e.g., via the connecting assembly 226) can be altered by the conditioning circuit 214. For example, the conditioning circuit 214 can change the voltage, current, frequency, phase, magnitude, intensity, waveform, and the like, of the current that is received from the power source 212 and/or the connecting assembly 226. The modified current can be the examination signal that is electrically injected into the route 108 by the application device 210. Additionally or alternatively, the control unit 206 can form the examination signal by controlling the switch 224. For example, the examination signal can be formed by turning the switch 224 on to allow current to flow from the conditioning circuit 214 and/or the power source 212 to the application device 210.
In an embodiment, the control unit 206 may control the conditioning circuit 214 to form the examination signal. For example, the control unit 206 may control the conditioning circuit 214 to change the voltage, current, frequency, phase, magnitude, intensity, waveform, and the like, of the current that is received from the power source 212 and/or the connecting assembly 226 to form the examination signal. The examination signal optionally may be a waveform that includes multiple frequencies. The examination signal may include multiple harmonics or overtones. The examination signal may be a square wave or the like.
The examination signal is conducted through the application device 210 to the route 108, and is electrically injected into a conductive portion of the route 108. For example, the examination signal may be conducted into a conductive track of the route 108. In another embodiment, the application device 210 may not directly engage (e.g., touch) the route 108, but may be wirelessly coupled with the route 108 in order to electrically inject the examination signal into the route 108 (e.g., via induction).
The conductive portion of the route 108 that extends between the first and second vehicles 202, 204 during travel of the vehicle system may form a track circuit through which the examination signal may be conducted. The first vehicle 202 can be coupled (e.g., coupled physically, coupled wirelessly, among others) to the track circuit by the application device 210. The power source (e.g., the onboard power source 212 and/or the off-board electrified conductive pathway 228) can transfer power (e.g., the examination signal) through the track circuit toward the second vehicle 204.
By way of example and not limitation, the first vehicle 202 can be coupled to a track of the route 108, and the track can be the track circuit that extends and conductively couples one or more components of the examination system 200 on the first vehicle 202 with one or more components of the examination system 200 on the second vehicle 204.
In an embodiment, the control unit 206 includes or represents a manager component. Such a manager component can be configured to activate a transmission of electric current into the route 108 via the application device 210. In another instance, the manager component can activate or deactivate a transfer of the portion of power from the onboard and/or off-board power source to the application device 210, such as by controlling the switch and/or conditioning circuit. Moreover, the manager component can adjust parameter(s) associated with the portion of power that is transferred to the route 108. For instance, the manager component can adjust an amount of power transferred, a frequency at which the power is transferred (e.g., a pulsed power delivery, AC power, among others), a duration of time the portion of power is transferred, among others. Such parameter(s) can be adjusted by the manager component based on at least one of a geographic location of the vehicle or the device or an identification of the device (e.g., type, location, make, model, among others).
The manager component can leverage a geographic location of the vehicle or the device in order to adjust a parameter for the portion of power that can be transferred to the device from the power source. For instance, the amount of power transferred can be adjusted by the manager component based on the device power input. By way of example and not limitation, the portion of power transferred can meet or be below the device power input in order to reduce risk of damage to the device. In another example, the geographic location of the vehicle and/or the device can be utilized to identify a particular device and, in turn, a power input for such device. The geographic location of the vehicle and/or the device can be ascertained by a location on a track circuit, identification of the track circuit, Global Positioning Service (GPS), among others.
The detection unit 218 disposed onboard the second vehicle 204 as shown in
The detection unit 218 monitors one or more electrical characteristics of the route 108 using the detection device 230. For example, the voltage of a direct current conducted by the route 108 may be detected by monitoring the voltage conducted along the route 108 to the detection device 230. In another example, the current (e.g., frequency, amps, phases, or the like) of an alternating current or RF signal being conducted by the route 108 may be detected by monitoring the current conducted along the route 108 to the detection device 230. As another example, the signal-to-noise ratio of a signal being conducted by the detection device 230 from the route 108 may be detected by the detection unit 218 examining the signal conducted by the detection device 230 (e.g., a received signal) and comparing the received signal to a designated signal. For example, the examination signal that is injected into the route 108 using the application device 210 may include a designated signal or portion of a designated signal. The detection unit 218 may compare the received signal that is conducted from the route 108 into the detection device 230 with this designated signal in order to measure a signal-to-noise ratio of the received signal.
The detection unit 218 determines one or more electrical characteristics of the signal that is received (e.g., picked up) by the detection device 230 from the route 108 and reports the characteristics of the received signal to the identification unit 220. The one or more electrical characteristics may include voltage, current, frequency, phase, phase shift or difference, modulation, intensity, embedded signature, and the like. If no signal is received by the detection device 230, then the detection unit 218 may report the absence of such a signal to the identification unit 220. For example, if the detection unit 218 does not detect at least a designated voltage, designated current, or the like, as being received by the detection device 230, then the detection unit 218 may not detect any received signal. Alternatively or additionally, the detection unit 218 may communicate the detection of a signal that is received by the detection device 230 only upon detection of the signal by the detection device 230.
In an embodiment, the detection unit 218 may determine the characteristics of the signals received by the detection device 230 in response to a notification received from the control unit 206 in the first vehicle 202. For example, when the control unit 206 is to cause the application device 210 to inject the examination signal into the route 108, the control unit 206 may direct the communication unit 216 to transmit a notification signal to the detection device 230 via the communication unit 222 of the second vehicle 204. The communication units 216, 222 may include respective antennas 232, 234 and associated circuitry for wirelessly communicating signals between the vehicles 202, 204, and/or with off-board locations. The communication unit 216 may wirelessly transmit a notification to the detection unit 218 that instructs the detection unit 218 as to when the examination signal is to be input into the route 108. Additionally or alternatively, the communication units 216, 222 may be connected via one or more wires, cables, and the like, such as a multiple unit (MU) cable, train line, or other conductive pathway(s), to allow communication between the communication units 216, 222.
The detection unit 218 may begin monitoring signals received by the detection device 230. For example, the detection unit 218 may not begin or resume monitoring the received signals of the detection device 230 unless or until the detection unit 218 is instructed that the control unit 206 is causing the injection of the examination signal into the route 108. Alternatively or additionally, the detection unit 218 may periodically monitor the detection device 230 for received signals and/or may monitor the detection device 230 for received signals upon being manually prompted by an operator of the examination system 200.
The identification unit 220 receives the characteristics of the received signal from the detection unit 218 and determines if the characteristics indicate receipt of all or a portion of the examination signal injected into the route 108 by the first vehicle 202. The identification unit 220 includes hardware circuitry that includes and/or is connected with one or more processors, controllers, or other electronic logic-based devices. Although the detection unit 218 and the identification unit 220 are shown as separate units, the detection unit 218 and the identification unit 220 may refer to the same unit. For example, the detection unit 218 and the identification unit 220 may be a single hardware component disposed onboard the second vehicle 204 and/or may share one or more of the same processors.
The identification unit 220 examines the characteristics and determines if the characteristics indicate that the section of the route 108 disposed between the first vehicle 202 and the second vehicle 204 is damaged or at least partially damaged. For example, if the application device 210 injected the examination signal into a track of the route 108 and one or more characteristics (e.g., voltage, current, frequency, intensity, signal-to-noise ratio, and the like) of the examination signal are not detected by the detection unit 218, then, the identification unit 220 may determine that the section of the track that was disposed between the vehicles 202, 204 is broken or otherwise damaged such that the track cannot conduct the examination signal. Additionally or alternatively, the identification unit 220 can examine the signal-to-noise ratio of the signal detected by the detection unit 218 and determine if the section of the route 108 between the vehicles 202, 204 is potentially broken or damaged. For example, the identification unit 220 may identify this section of the route 108 as being broken or damaged if the signal-to-noise ratio of one or more (or at least a designated amount) of the received signals is less than a designated ratio.
The identification unit 220 may include or be communicatively coupled (e.g., by one or more wired and/or wireless connections that allow communication) with a location determining unit that can determine the location of the vehicle 204 and/or vehicle system. For example, the location determining unit may include a GPS unit or other device that can determine where the first vehicle and/or second vehicle are located along the route 108. The distance between the first vehicle 202 and the second vehicle 204 along the length of the vehicle system may be known to the identification unit 220, such as by inputting the distance into the identification unit 220 using one or more input devices and/or via the communication unit 222.
The identification unit 220 can identify which section of the route 108 is potentially damaged based on the location of the first vehicle 202 and/or the second vehicle 204 during transmission of the examination signal through the route 108. For example, the identification unit 220 can identify the section of the route 108 that is within a designated distance of the vehicle system, the first vehicle 202, and/or the second vehicle 204 as the potentially damaged section when the identification unit 220 determines that the examination signal is not received or at least has a decreased signal-to-noise ratio.
Additionally or alternatively, the identification unit 220 can identify which section of the route 108 is potentially damaged based on the locations of the first vehicle 202 and the second vehicle 204 during transmission of the examination signal through the route 108, the direction of travel of the vehicle system that includes the vehicles 202, 204, the speed of the vehicle system, and/or a speed of propagation of the examination signal through the route 108. The speed of propagation of the examination signal may be a designated speed that is based on one or more of the material(s) from which the route 108 is formed, the type of examination signal that is injected into the route 108, and the like. In an embodiment, the identification unit 220 may be notified when the examination signal is injected into the route 108 via the notification provided by the control unit 206. The identification unit 220 can then determine which portion of the route 108 is disposed between the first vehicle 202 and the second vehicle 204 as the vehicle system moves along the route 108 during the time period that corresponds to when the examination signal is expected to be propagating through the route 108 between the vehicles 202, 204 as the vehicles 202, 204 move. This portion of the route 108 may be the section of potentially damaged route that is identified.
One or more responsive actions may be initiated when the potentially damaged section of the route 108 is identified. For example, in response to identifying the potentially damaged portion of the route 108, the identification unit 220 may notify the control unit 206 via the communication units 222, 216. The control unit 206 and/or the identification unit 220 can automatically slow down or stop movement of the vehicle system. For example, the control unit 206 and/or identification unit 220 can be communicatively coupled with one or more propulsion systems (e.g., engines, alternators/generators, motors, and the like) of one or more of the propulsion-generating vehicles in the vehicle system. The control unit 206 and/or identification unit 220 may automatically direct the propulsion systems to slow down and/or stop.
With continued reference to
In addition or as an alternate to the responsive actions that may be taken when a potentially damaged section of the route 108 is identified, the examination system 200 onboard the first vehicle system 300 may automatically notify the second vehicle system 302. The control unit 206 and/or the identification unit 220 may wirelessly communicate (e.g., transmit or broadcast) a warning signal to the second vehicle system 302. The warning signal may notify the second vehicle system 302 of the location of the potentially damaged section of the route 108 before the second vehicle system 302 arrives at the potentially damaged section. The second vehicle system 302 may be able to slow down, stop, or move to another route to avoid traveling over the potentially damaged section.
Additionally or alternatively, the control unit 206 and/or identification unit 220 may communicate a warning signal to a stationary wayside device 304 in response to identifying a section of the route 108 as being potentially damaged. The device 304 can be, for instance, wayside equipment, an electrical device, a client asset, a defect detection device, a device utilized with Positive Train Control (PTC), a signal system component(s), a device utilized with Automated Equipment Identification (AEI), among others. In one example, the device 304 can be a device utilized with AEI. AEI is an automated equipment identification mechanism that can aggregate data related to equipment for the vehicle. By way of example and not limitation, AEI can utilize passive radio frequency technology in which a tag (e.g., passive tag) is associated with the vehicle and a reader/receiver receives data from the tag when in geographic proximity thereto. The AEI device can be a reader or receiver that collects or stores data from a passive tag, a data store that stores data related to passive tag information received from a vehicle, an antenna that facilitates communication between the vehicle and a passive tag, among others. Such an AEI device may store an indication of where the potentially damaged section of the route 108 is located so that the second vehicle system 302 may obtain this indication when the second vehicle system 302 reads information from the AEI device.
In another example, the device 304 can be a signaling device for the vehicle. For instance, the device 304 can provide visual and/or audible warnings to provide warning to other entities such as other vehicle systems (e.g., the vehicle system 302) of the potentially damaged section of the route 108. The signaling devices can be, but not limited to, a light, a motorized gate arm (e.g., motorized motion in a vertical plane), an audible warning device, among others.
In another example, the device 304 can be utilized with PTC. PTC can refer to communication-based/processor-based vehicle control technology that provides a system capable of reliably and functionally preventing collisions between vehicle systems, over speed derailments, incursions into established work zone limits, and the movement of a vehicle system through a route switch in the improper position. PTC systems can perform other additional specified functions. Such a PTC device 304 can provide warnings to the second vehicle system 204 that cause the second vehicle system 204 to automatically slow and/or stop, among other responsive actions, when the second vehicle system 204 approaches the location of the potentially damaged section of the route 108.
In another example, the wayside device 304 can act as a beacon or other transmitting or broadcasting device other than a PTC device that communicates warnings to other vehicles or vehicle systems traveling on the route 108 of the identified section of the route 108 that is potentially damaged.
The control unit 206 and/or identification unit 220 may communicate a repair signal to an off-board facility 306 in response to identifying a section of the route 108 as being potentially damaged. The facility 306 can represent a location, such as a dispatch or repair center, which is located off-board of the vehicle systems 202, 204. The repair signal may include or represent a request for further inspection and/or repair of the route 108 at the potentially damaged section. Upon receipt of the repair signal, the facility 306 may dispatch one or more persons and/or equipment to the location of the potentially damaged section of the route 108 in order to inspect and/or repair the route 108 at the location.
Additionally or alternatively, the control unit 206 and/or identification unit 220 may notify an operator of the vehicle system of the potentially damaged section of the route 108 and suggest the operator initiate one or more of the responsive actions described herein.
In another embodiment, the examination system 200 may identify the potentially damaged section of the route 108 using the wayside device 304. For example, the detection device 230, the detection unit 218, and the communication unit 222 may be located at or included in the wayside device 304. The control unit 206 on the vehicle system may determine when the vehicle system is within a designated distance of the wayside device 304 based on an input or known location of the wayside device 304 and the monitored location of the vehicle system (e.g., from data obtained from a location determination unit). Upon traveling within a designated distance of the wayside device 304, the control unit 206 may cause the examination signal to be injected into the route 108. The wayside device 304 can monitor one or more electrical characteristics of the route 108 similar to the second vehicle 204 described above. If the electrical characteristics indicate that the section of the route 108 between the vehicle system and the wayside device 304 is damaged or broken, the wayside device 304 can initiate one or more responsive actions, such as by directing the vehicle system to automatically slow down and/or stop, warning other vehicle systems traveling on the route 108, requesting inspection and/or repair of the potentially damaged section of the route 108, and the like.
The examination system 500 includes an identification unit 520 and a signal communication system 521. The identification unit 520 may be similar to or represent the identification unit 220 shown in
In other embodiments shown and described below, the signal communication system 521 may include two or more application devices and/or two or more detection devices or units. Although not indicated in
The conditioning circuit 514 may be coupled with a connecting assembly 526 that is similar to or represents the connecting assembly 226 shown in
The electric current that is conveyed to the conditioning circuit 514 from the power source 512 and/or the off-board source can be altered by the conditioning circuit 514. The modified current can be the examination signal that is electrically injected into the route 108 by the application device 510. Optionally, the control unit 506 can form the examination signal by controlling the switch 524, as described above. Optionally, the control unit 506 may control the conditioning circuit 514 to form the examination signal, also as described above.
The examination signal is conducted through the application device 510 to the route 108, and is electrically injected into a conductive portion of the route 108. The conductive portion of the route 108 that extends between the application device 510 and the detection device 530 of the vehicle 502 during travel may form a track circuit through which the examination signal may be conducted.
The control unit 506 may include or represent a manager component. Such a manager component can be configured to activate a transmission of electric current into the route 108 via the application device 510. In another instance, the manager component can activate or deactivate a transfer of the portion of power from the onboard and/or off-board power source to the application device 510, such as by controlling the switch and/or conditioning circuit. Moreover, the manager component can adjust parameter(s) associated with the portion of power that is transferred to the route 108.
The detection unit 518 monitors the route 108 to attempt to detect the examination signal that is injected into the route 108 by the application device 510. In one aspect, the detection unit 518 may follow behind the application device 510 along a direction of travel of the vehicle 502. The detection unit 518 is coupled with the detection device 530 that engages or is inductively coupled with the route 108, as described above.
The detection unit 518 monitors one or more electrical characteristics of the route 108 using the detection device 530. The detection unit 518 may compare the received signal that is conducted from the route 108 into the detection device 530 with this designated signal in order to measure a signal-to-noise ratio of the received signal. The detection unit 518 determines one or more electrical characteristics of the signal by the detection device 530 from the route 108 and reports the characteristics of the received signal to the identification unit 520. If no signal is received by the detection device 530, then the detection unit 518 may report the absence of such a signal to the identification unit 520. In an embodiment, the detection unit 518 may determine the characteristics of the signals received by the detection device 530 in response to a notification received from the control unit 506, as described above.
The detection unit 518 may begin monitoring signals received by the detection device 530. For example, the detection unit 518 may not begin or resume monitoring the received signals of the detection device 530 unless or until the detection unit 518 is instructed that the control unit 506 is causing the injection of the examination signal into the route 108. Alternatively or additionally, the detection unit 518 may periodically monitor the detection device 530 for received signals and/or may monitor the detection device 530 for received signals upon being manually prompted by an operator of the examination system 500.
In one aspect, the application device 510 includes a first axle 528 and/or a first wheel 530 that is connected to the axle 528 of the vehicle 502. The axle 528 and wheel 530 may be connected to a first truck 532 of the vehicle 502. The application device 510 may be conductively coupled with the route 108 (e.g., by directly engaging the route 108) to inject the examination signal into the route 108 via the axle 528 and the wheel 530, or via the wheel 530 alone. The detection device 530 may include a second axle 534 and/or a second wheel 536 that is connected to the axle 534 of the vehicle 502. The axle 534 and wheel 536 may be connected to a second truck 538 of the vehicle 502. The detection device 530 may monitor the electrical characteristics of the route 108 via the axle 534 and the wheel 536, or via the wheel 536 alone. Optionally, the axle 534 and/or wheel 536 may inject the signal while the other axle 528 and/or wheel 530 monitors the electrical characteristics.
The identification unit 520 receives the one or more characteristics of the received signal from the detection unit 518 and determines if the characteristics indicate receipt of all or a portion of the examination signal injected into the route 108 by the application device 510. The identification unit 520 interprets the one or more characteristics monitored by the detection unit 518 to determine a state of the route. The identification unit 520 examines the characteristics and determines if the characteristics indicate that a test section of the route 108 disposed between the application device 510 and the detection device 530 is in a non-damaged state, is in a damaged or at least partially damaged state, or is in a non-damaged state that indicates the presence of an electrical short, as described below.
The identification unit 520 may include or be communicatively coupled with a location determining unit that can determine the location of the vehicle 502. The distance between the application device 510 and the detection device 530 along the length of the vehicle 502 may be known to the identification unit 520, such as by inputting the distance into the identification unit 520 using one or more input devices and/or via the communication unit 516.
The identification unit 520 can identify which section of the route 108 is potentially damaged based on the location of the vehicle 502 during transmission of the examination signal through the route 108, the direction of travel of the vehicle 502, the speed of the vehicle 502, and/or a speed of propagation of the examination signal through the route 108, as described above.
One or more responsive actions may be initiated when the potentially damaged section of the route 108 is identified. For example, in response to identifying the potentially damaged portion of the route 108, the identification unit 520 may notify the control unit 506. The control unit 506 and/or the identification unit 520 can automatically slow down or stop movement of the vehicle 502 and/or the vehicle system that includes the vehicle 502. For example, the control unit 506 and/or identification unit 520 can be communicatively coupled with one or more propulsion systems (e.g., engines, alternators/generators, motors, and the like) of one or more of the propulsion-generating vehicles in the vehicle system. The control unit 506 and/or identification unit 520 may automatically direct the propulsion systems to slow down and/or stop.
At 402, an examination signal is injected into the route being traveled by the vehicle system at a first vehicle. For example, a direct current, alternating current, RF signal, or another signal may be conductively and/or inductively injected into a conductive portion of the route 108, such as a track of the route 108.
At 404, one or more electrical characteristics of the route are monitored at another, second vehicle in the same vehicle system. For example, the route 108 may be monitored to determine if any voltage or current is being conducted by the route 108.
At 406, a determination is made as to whether the one or more monitored electrical characteristics indicate receipt of the examination signal. For example, if a direct current, alternating current, or RF signal is detected in the route 108, then the detected current or signal may indicate that the examination signal is conducted through the route 108 from the first vehicle to the second vehicle in the same vehicle system. As a result, the route 108 may be substantially intact between the first and second vehicles. Optionally, the examination signal may be conducted through the route 108 between components joined to the same vehicle. As a result, the route 108 may be substantially intact between the components of the same vehicle. Flow of the method 400 may proceed to 408. On the other hand, if no direct current, alternating current, or RF signal is detected in the route 108, then the absence of the current or signal may indicate that the examination signal is not conducted through the route 108 from the first vehicle to the second vehicle in the same vehicle system or between components of the same vehicle. As a result, the route 108 may be broken between the first and second vehicles, or between the components of the same vehicle. Flow of the method 400 may then proceed to 412.
At 408, a determination is made as to whether a change in the one or more monitored electrical characteristics indicates damage to the route. For example, a change in the examination signal between when the signal was injected into the route 108 and when the examination signal is detected may be determined. This change may reflect a decrease in voltage, a decrease in current, a change in frequency and/or phase, a decrease in a signal-to-noise ratio, or the like. The change can indicate that the examination signal was conducted through the route 108, but that damage to the route 108 may have altered the signal. For example, if the change in voltage, current, frequency, phase, signal-to-noise ratio, or the like, of the injected examination signal to the detected examination signal exceeds a designated threshold amount (or if the monitored characteristic decreased below a designated threshold), then the change may indicate damage to the route 108, but not a complete break in the route 108. As a result, flow of the method 400 can proceed to 412.
On the other hand, if the change in voltage, amps, frequency, phase, signal-to-noise ratio, or the like, of the injected examination signal to the detected examination signal does not exceed the designated threshold amount (and/or if the monitored characteristic does not decrease below a designated threshold), then the change may not indicate damage to the route 108. As a result, flow of the method 400 can proceed to 410.
At 410, the test section of the route that is between the first and second vehicles in the vehicle system or between the components of the same vehicle is not identified as potentially damaged, and the vehicle system may continue to travel along the route. Additionally examination signals may be injected into the route at other locations as the vehicle system moves along the route.
At 412, the section of the route that is or was disposed between the first and second vehicles, or between the components of the same vehicle, is identified as a potentially damaged section of the route. For example, due to the failure of the examination signal to be detected and/or the change in the examination signal that is detected, the route may be broken and/or damaged between the first vehicle and the second vehicle, or between the components of the same vehicle.
At 414, one or more responsive actions may be initiated in response to identifying the potentially damaged section of the route. As described above, these actions can include, but are not limited to, automatically and/or manually slowing or stopping movement of the vehicle system, warning other vehicle systems about the potentially damaged section of the route, notifying wayside devices of the potentially damaged section of the route, requesting inspection and/or repair of the potentially damaged section of the route, and the like.
In one or more embodiments, a route examination and method may be used to identify electrical shorts, or short circuits, on a route. The identification of short circuits may allow for the differentiation of a short circuit on a non-damaged section of the route from a broken or deteriorated track on a damaged section of the route. The differentiation of short circuits from open circuits caused by various types of damage to the route provides identification of false alarms. Detecting a false alarm preserves the time and costs associated with attempting to locate and repair a section of the route that is not actually damaged. For example, referring to the method 400 above at 408, a change in the monitored electrical characteristics may indicate that the test section of the route includes an electrical short that short circuits the two tracks together. For example, an increase in the amplitude of monitored voltage or current and/or a phase shift may indicate the presence of an electrical short. The electrical short provides a circuit path between the two tracks, which effectively reduces the circuit path of the propagating examination signal between the point of injection and the place of detection, which results in an increased voltage and/or current and/or the phase shift.
The vehicle 602 includes multiple transmitters or application devices 606 disposed onboard the vehicle 602. The application devices 606 may be positioned at spaced apart locations along the length of the vehicle 602. For example, a first application device 606A may be located closer to a front end 608 of the vehicle 602 relative to a second application device 606B located closer to a rear end 610 of the vehicle 602. The designations of “front” and “rear” may be based on the direction of travel 612 of the vehicle 602 along the route 604.
The route 604 includes conductive tracks 614 in parallel, and the application devices 606 are configured to be conductively and/or inductively coupled with at least one conductive track 614 along the route 604. For example, the conductive tracks 614 may be rails in a railway context. In an embodiment, the first application device 606A is configured to be conductively and/or inductively coupled with a first conductive track 614A, and the second application device 606B is configured to be conductively and/or inductively coupled with a second conductive track 614B. As such, the application devices 606 may be disposed on the vehicle 602 diagonally from each other. The application devices 606 are utilized to electrically inject at least one examination signal into the route. For example, the first application device 606A may be used to inject a first examination signal into the first conductive track 614A of the route 604. Likewise, the second application device 606B may be used to inject a second examination signal into the second conductive track 614B of the route 604.
The vehicle 602 also includes multiple receiver coils or detection units 616 disposed onboard the vehicle 602. The detection unit 616 can include hardware circuitry that includes and/or is connected with one or more processors, controllers, or other electronic logic-based devices. The detection units 616 are positioned at spaced apart locations along the length of the vehicle 602. For example, a first detection unit 616A may be located towards the front end 608 of the vehicle 602 relative to a second detection unit 616B located closer to the rear end 610 of the vehicle 602. The detection units 616 are configured to monitor one or more electrical characteristics of the route 604 along the conductive tracks 614 in response to the examination signals being injected into the route 604. The electrical characteristics that are monitored may include a current, a phase shift, a modulation, a frequency, a voltage, amperes, conductivity, impedance, and the like. For example, the first detection unit 616A may be configured to monitor one or more electrical characteristics of the route 604 along the second track 614B, and the second detection unit 616B may be configured to monitor one or more electrical characteristics of the route 604 along the first track 614A. As such, the detection units 616 may be disposed on the vehicle 602 diagonally from each other. In an embodiment, each of the application devices 606A, 606B and the detection units 616A, 616B may define individual corners of a test section of the vehicle 602. Optionally, the application devices 606 and/or the detection units 616 may be staggered in location along the length and/or width of the vehicle 602. Optionally, the application device 606A and detection unit 616A and/or the application device 606B and detection unit 616B may be disposed along the same track 614. The application devices 606 and/or detection units 616 may be disposed on the vehicle 602 at other locations in other embodiments.
In an embodiment, two of the conductive tracks 614 (e.g., tracks 614A and 614B) may be conductively and/or inductively coupled to each other through multiple shunts 618 along the length of the vehicle 602. For example, the vehicle 602 may include two shunts 618, with one shunt 618A located closer to the front 608 of the vehicle 602 relative to the other shunt 618B. In an embodiment, the shunts 618 are conductive and together with the tracks 614 define an electrically conductive test loop 620. The conductive test loop 620 represents a track circuit or circuit path along the conductive tracks 614 between the shunts 618. The test loop 620 moves along the tracks 614 as the vehicle 602 travels along the route 604 in the direction 612. Therefore, the section of the conductive tracks 614 defining part of the conductive test loop 620 changes as the vehicle 602 progresses on a trip along the route 604.
In an embodiment, the application devices 606 and the detection units 616 are in electrical contact with the conductive test loop 620. For example, the application device 606A may be in electrical contact with track 614A and/or shunt 618A; the application device 606B may be in electrical contact with track 614B and/or shunt 618B; the detection unit 616A may be in electrical contact with track 614B and/or shunt 618A; and the detection unit 616B may be in electrical contact with track 614A and/or shunt 618B.
The two shunts 618A, 618B may be first and second trucks disposed on a rail vehicle. Each truck 618 includes an axle 622 interconnecting two wheels 624. Each wheel 624 contacts a respective one of the tracks 614. The wheels 624 and the axle 622 of each of the trucks 618 are configured to electrically connect (e.g., short) the two tracks 614A, 614B to define respective ends of the conductive test loop 620. For example, the injected first and second examination signals may circulate the conductive test loop 620 along the length of a section of the first track 614A, through the wheels 624 and axle 622 of the shunt 618A to the second track 614B, along a section of the second track 614B, and across the shunt 618B, returning to the first track 614A.
In an embodiment, alternating current transmitted from the vehicle 602 is injected into the route 604 at two or more points through the tracks 614 and received at different locations on the vehicle 602. For example, the first and second application devices 606A, 606B may be used to inject the first and second examination signals into respective first and second tracks 614A, 614B. One or more electrical characteristics in response to the injected examination signals may be received at the first and second detection units 616A, 616B. Each examination signal may have a unique identifier so the signals can be distinguished from each other at the detection units 616. For example, the unique identifier of the first examination signal may have a base frequency, a phase, a modulation, an embedded signature, and/or the like, that differs from the unique identifier of the second examination signal.
In an embodiment, the examination system 600 may be used to more precisely locate faults on track circuits in railway signaling systems, and to differentiate between track features. For example, the system 600 may be used to distinguish broken tracks (e.g., rails) versus crossing shunt devices, non-insulated switches, scrap metal connected across the tracks 614A and 614B, and other situations or devices that might produce an electrical short (e.g., short circuit) when a current is applied to the conductive tracks 614 along the route 604. In typical track circuits looking for damaged sections of routes, an electrical short may appear as similar to a break, creating a false alarm. The examination system 600 also may be configured to distinguish breaks in the route due to damage from intentional, non-damaged “breaks” in the route, such as insulated joints and turnouts (e.g., track switches), which simulate actual breaks but do not short the conductive test loop 620 when traversed by a vehicle system having the examination system 600.
In an embodiment, when there is no break or short circuit on the route 604 and the tracks 614 are electrically contiguous, the injected examination signals circulate the length of the test loop 620 and are received by all detection units 616 present on the test loop 620. Therefore, both detection units 616A and 616B receive both the first and second examination signals when there is no electrical break or electrical short on the route 604 within the section of the route 604 defining the test loop 620.
As discussed further below, when the vehicle 602 passes over an electrical short (e.g., a device or a condition of a section of the route 604 that causes a short circuit when a current is applied along the section of the route 604), two additional conductive current loops or conductive short loops are formed. The two additional conductive short loops have electrical characteristics that are unique to a short circuit (e.g., as opposed to electrical characteristics of an open circuit caused by a break in a track 614). For example, the electrical characteristics of the current circulating the first conductive short loop may have an amplitude that is an inverse derivative of the amplitude of the second additional current loop as the electrical short is traversed by the vehicle 602. In addition, the amplitude of the current along the original conductive test loop 620 spanning the periphery of the test section diminishes considerably while the vehicle 602 traverses the electrical short. All of the one or more electrical characteristics in the original and additional current loops may be received and/or monitored by the detection units 616. Sensing the two additional short loops may provide a clear differentiator to identify that the loss of current in the original test loop is the result of a short circuit and not an electrical break in the track 614. Analysis of the electrical characteristics of the additional short loops relative to the vehicle motion and/or location may provide more precision in locating the short circuit within the span of the test section.
In an alternative embodiment, the examination system 600 includes the two spaced-apart detection units 616A, 616B defining a test section of the route 604 there between, but only includes one of the application devices 606A, 606B, such as only the first application device 606A. The detection units 616A, 616B are each configured to monitor one or more electrical characteristics of at least one of the conductive tracks 614A, 614B proximate to the respective detection unit 616A, 616B in response to at least one examination signal being electrically injected into at least one of the conductive tracks 614A, 614B by the application device 606A. In another alternative embodiment, the examination system 600 includes the two spaced-apart detection units 616A, 616B, but does not include either of the application devices 606A, 606B. For example, the examination signal may be derived from an inherent electrical current of a traction motor (not shown) of the vehicle 602 (or another vehicle of the vehicle system). The examination signal may be injected into at least one of the conductive tracks 614A, 614B via a conductive and/or inductive electrical connection between the traction motor and the one or both conductive tracks 614A, 614B, such as a conductive connection through the wheels 624. In other embodiments, the examination signal may be derived from electrical currents of other motors of the vehicle 602 or may be an electrical current injected into the tracks 614 from a wayside device.
Regardless of whether the examination system 600 includes one application device or no application devices, the identification unit 520 (shown in
In an alternative embodiment, the vehicle 602 includes the two spaced-apart application devices 606A, 606B defining a test section of the route 604 there between, but only includes one of the detection units 616A, 616B, such as only the first detection unit 616A. The first and second application devices 606A, 606B are configured to electrically inject the first and second examination signals, respectively, into the corresponding conductive tracks 614A, 614B that the application devices 606A, 606B are coupled to. The detection unit 616A is configured to monitor one or more electrical characteristics of at least one of the conductive tracks 614A, 614B in response to the first and second examination signals being injected into the tracks 614.
In this embodiment, the identification unit 520 (shown in
Additionally, or alternatively, the identification unit 520 may be configured to determine that the test section of the route 604 includes an electrical short by detecting a change in a phase difference between the first and second examination signals. For example, the identification unit 520 may compare a detected phase difference between the first and second examination signals that is detected by the detection unit 616A to a known phase difference between the first and second examination signals. The known phase difference may be a phase difference between the examination signals upon injecting the signals into the route 604 or may be a detected phase difference between the examination signals along sections of the route that are known to be not damaged and free of electrical shorts. Thus, if the one of more electrical characteristics monitored by the detection unit 616A indicate that the phase difference between the first and second examination signals is similar to the known phase difference, such that the change in phase difference is negligible or within a threshold value that compensates for variations due to noise, etc., then the status of the test section of route 604 may be non-damaged and free of an electrical short. If the detected phase difference varies from the known phase difference by more than the designated threshold value (such that the change in phase difference exceeds the designated threshold), the status of the test section of route 604 may be non-damaged and includes an electrical short. If the test section of the route 604 is potentially damaged, the one or more monitored electrical characteristics may indicate that the examination signals were not received by the detection unit 616A, so phase difference between the first and second examination signals is not detected.
In another alternative embodiment, the vehicle 602 includes one application device, such as the application device 606A, and one detection unit, such as the detection unit 616A. The application device 606A is disposed proximate to the detection unit 616A. For example, the application device 606A and the detection unit 616A may be located on opposite tracks 614A, 614B at similar positions along the length of the vehicle 602 between the two shunts 618, as shown in
In this embodiment, the identification unit 520 (shown in
In an embodiment, the examination system 700 includes a first application device 708A configured to be disposed on a first vehicle 702A of the vehicle system 702, and a second application device 708B configured to be disposed on a second vehicle 702B of the vehicle system 702. The application devices 708A, 708B may be conductively and/or inductively coupled with different conductive tracks 712, such that the application devices 708A, 708B are disposed diagonally along the vehicle system 704. The first and second vehicles 702A and 702B may be directly coupled, or may be indirectly coupled, having one or more additional vehicles coupled in between the vehicles 702A, 702B. Optionally the vehicles 702A, 702B may each be either one of the vehicles 104 or 106 shown in
The examination system 700 also includes a first detection unit 710A configured to be disposed on the first vehicle 702A of the vehicle system 702, and a second detection unit 710B configured to be disposed on the second vehicle 702B of the vehicle system 702. The first and second detection units 710A, 710B may be configured to monitor electrical characteristics of the route 706 along different conductive tracks 712, such that the detection units 710 are oriented diagonally along the vehicle system 704. The location of the first application device 708A and/or first detection unit 710A along the length of the first vehicle 702A is optional, as well as the location of the second application device 708B and/or second detection unit 710B along the length of the second vehicle 702B. However, the location of the application devices 708A, 708B affects the length of a current loop that defines a test loop 714. For example, the test loop 714 spans a greater length of the route 706 than the test loop 620 shown in
The vehicle 802 includes a first application device 806A that is conductively and/or inductively coupled to a first conductive track 808A of the route 804, and a second application device 806B that is conductively and/or inductively coupled to a second conductive track 808B. A control unit 810 is configured to control supply of electric current from a power source 811 (e.g., battery 812 and/or conditioning circuits 813) to the first and second application devices 806A, 806B in order to electrically inject examination signals into the conductive tracks 808. For example, the control unit 810 may control the application of a first examination signal into the first conductive track 808A via the first application device 806A and the application of a second examination signal into the second conductive track 808B via the second application device 806B. The control unit 810 can include hardware circuitry that includes and/or is connected with one or more processors, controllers, or other electronic logic-based devices.
The control unit 810 is configured to control application of at least one of a designated direct current, a designated alternating current, or a designated radio frequency signal of each of the first and second examination signals from the power source 811 to the conductive tracks 808 of the route 804. For example, the power source 811 may be an onboard energy storage device 812 (e.g., battery) and the control unit 810 may be configured to inject the first and second examination signals into the route 804 by controlling when electric current is conducted from the onboard energy storage device 812 to the first and second application devices 806A and 806B. Alternatively or in addition, the power source 811 may be an off-board energy storage device 813 (e.g., catenary and conditioning circuits) and the control unit 810 is configured to inject the first and second examination signals into the conductive tracks 808 by controlling when electric current is conducted from the off-board energy storage device 813 to the first and second application devices 806A and 806B.
The vehicle 802 also includes a first detection unit 814A disposed onboard the vehicle 802 that is configured to monitor one or more electrical characteristics of the second conductive track 808B of the route 804, and a second detection unit 814B disposed onboard the vehicle 802 that is configured to monitor one or more electrical characteristics of the first conductive track 808A. An identification unit 816 is disposed onboard the vehicle 802. The identification unit 816 is configured to examine the one or more electrical characteristics of the conductive tracks 808 monitored by the detection units 814A, 814B in order to determine whether a section of the route 804 traversed by the vehicle 802 is potentially damaged based on the one or more electrical characteristics. As used herein, “potentially damaged” means that the section of the route may be damaged or at least deteriorated. The identification unit 816 may further determine whether the section of the route traversed by the vehicle is damaged by distinguishing between one or more electrical characteristics that indicate damage to the section of the route and one or more electrical characteristics that indicate an electrical short on the section of the route. The identification unit 816 can include hardware circuitry that includes and/or is connected with one or more processors, controllers, or other electronic logic-based devices.
The vehicle 902 includes two transmitters or application units 908A and 908B, and two receivers or detection units 910A and 910B all disposed onboard the vehicle 902. The application units 908 and detection units 910 are positioned along a conductive loop 912 defined by shunts on the vehicle 902 and tracks 914 of the route 904 between the shunts. For example, the vehicle 902 may include six axles, each axle attached to two wheels in electrical contact with the tracks 914 and forming a shunt. Optionally, the conductive loop 912 may be bounded between the inner most axles (e.g., between the third and fourth axles) to reduce the amount of signal loss through the other axles and/or the vehicle frame. As such, the third and fourth axles define the ends of the conductive loop 912, and the tracks 914 define the segments of the conductive loop 912 that connect the ends. The detection units 910 can include hardware circuitry that includes and/or is connected with one or more processors, controllers, or other electronic logic-based devices.
The conductive loop 912 defines a test loop 912 (e.g., test section) for detecting faults in the route 904 and distinguishing damaged tracks 914 from short circuit false alarms. As the vehicle 902 traverses the route 904, a first examination signal is injected into a first track 914A of the route 904 from the first application unit 908A, and a second examination signal is injected into a second track 914B of the route 904 from the second application unit 908B. The first and second examination signals may be injected into the route 904 simultaneously or in a staggered sequence. The first and second examination signals each have a unique identifier to distinguish the first examination signal from the second examination signal as the signals circulate the test loop 912. The unique identifier of the first examination signal may include a frequency, a modulation, an embedded signature, and/or the like, that differs from the unique identifier of the second examination signal. For example, the first examination signal may have a higher frequency and/or a different embedded signature than the second examination signal.
In
In
As the vehicle 902 traverses over the electrical short 916, the electrical short 916 diverts the current flow of the first and second examination signals that circulate the test loop 912 to additional loops. For example, the first examination signal may be diverted by the short 916 to circulate primarily along a first conductive short loop 918 that is newly-defined along a section of the route 904 between the first application device 908A and the electrical short 916. Similarly, the second examination signal may be diverted to circulate primarily along a second conductive short loop 920 that is newly-defined along a section of the route 904 between the electrical short 916 and the second application device 908B. Only the first examining signal that was transmitted by the first application device 908A significantly traverses the first short loop 918, and only the second examination signal that was transmitted by the second application device 908B significantly traverses the second short loop 920.
As a result, the one or more electrical characteristics of the route received and/or monitored by first detection unit 910A may only indicate a presence of the first examination signal. Likewise, the electrical characteristics of the route received and/or monitored by second detection unit 910B may only indicate a presence of the second examining signal. As used herein, “indicat[ing] a presence of” an examination signal means that the received electrical characteristics include more than a mere threshold signal-to-noise ratio of the unique identifier indicative of the respective examination signal that is more than electrical noise. For example, since the electrical characteristics received by the second detection unit 910B may only indicate a presence of the second examination signal, the second examination signal exceeds the threshold signal-to-noise ratio of the received electrical characteristics but the first examination signal does not exceed the threshold. The first examination signal may not be significantly received at the second detection unit 908B because the majority of the first examination signal current originating at the device 908A may get diverted along the short 916 (e.g., along the first short loop 918) before traversing the length of the test loop 912 to the second detection device 908B. As such, the electrical characteristics with the unique identifiers indicative of the first examination signal received at the second detection device 910B may be significantly diminished when the vehicle 902 traverses the electrical short 916.
The peripheral size and/or area of the first and second conductive short loops 918 and 920 may have an inverse correlation at the vehicle 902 traverses the electrical short 916. For example, the first short loop 918 increases in size while the second short loop 920 decreases in size as the test loop 912 of the vehicle 902 overcomes and passes the short 916. It is noted that the first and second short loops 916 are only formed when the short 916 is located within the boundaries or area covered by the test loop 912. Therefore, received electrical characteristics that indicate the examination signals are circulating the first and second conductive short 918, 920 loops signify that the section includes an electrical short 916 (e.g., as opposed to a section that is damaged or is fully intact without an electrical short).
In
As the vehicle 902 traverses over the electrical break 922 such that the break 922 is located within the boundaries of the test loop 912 (e.g., between designated shunts of the vehicle 902 that define the ends of the test loop 912), the test loop 912 may be broken, forming an open circuit. As such, the injected first and second examination signals do not circulate the test loop 912 nor along any short loops. The first and second detection units 910A and 910B do not receive any significant electrical characteristics in response to the first and second examination signals because the signal current do not flow along the broken test loop 912. Once, the vehicle 902 passes beyond the break, subsequently injected first and second examination signals may circulate the test section 912 as shown in
As shown in
In
Between times t0 and t2, the electrical signals 1000 indicate that both examination signals are being received by both detection units 1002, 1004. Therefore, the signals are circulating the length of the conductive primary test loop 912 (shown in
At time t2, the vehicle traverses over an electrical short. As shown in
These electrical characteristics from time t2 to t4 indicate that the electrical short defines new circuit loops within the primary test loop 912 (shown in
At time t4, the test section (e.g., loop) of the vehicle passes beyond the electrical short. Between times t4 and t5, the electrical signals 1000 on the graph 1010 indicate that both the first and second examination signals once again circulate the primary test loop 912, as shown in
At time t5, the vehicle traverses over an electrical break in the route. As shown in
In an embodiment, the identification unit may be configured to use the received electrical signals 1000 to determine whether a section of the route traversed by the vehicle is potentially damaged, meaning that the section may be damaged or at least deteriorated. For example, based on the recorded waveforms of the electrical signals 1000 between times t2-t4 and t5-t7, the identification unit may identify the section of the route traversed between times t2-t4 as being non-damaged but having an electrical short and the section of route traversed between times t5-t7 as being damaged. For example, it is clear in the graph 1010 that the receiver coils or detection units 1002, 1004 both lose signal when the vehicle transits the damaged section of the route between times t5-t7. However, when crossing the short on the route between times t2-t4, the first detection unit 1002 loses the second examination signal, as shown on the electrical signal 1014, and the electrical signal 1018 representing second examination signal received by the second detection unit 1004 increases in amplitude as the short is transited. Thus, there is a noticeable distinction between a break in the track versus features that short the route. Optionally, a vehicle operator may view the graph 1010 on a display and manually identify sections of the route as being damaged or non-damaged but having an electrical short based on the recorded waveforms of the electrical signals 1000.
In an embodiment, the examination may be further used to distinguish between non-damaged track features by the received electrical signals 1000. For example, wide band shunts (e.g., capacitors) may behave similar to hard wire highway crossing shunts, except an additional phase shift may be identified depending on the frequencies of the first and second examination signals. Narrow band (e.g., tuned) shunts may impact the electrical signals 1000 by exhibiting larger phase and amplitude differences responsive to the relation of the tuned shunt frequency and the frequencies of the examination signals.
The examination may also distinguish electrical circuit breaks due to damage from electrical breaks (e.g., pseudo-breaks) due to intentional track features, such as insulated joints and turnouts (e.g., track switches). In turnouts, in specific areas, only a single pair of transmit and receive coils (e.g., a single application device and detection unit located along one conductive track) may be able to inject current (e.g., an examination signal). The pair on the opposite track (e.g., rail) may be traversing a “fouling circuit,” where the opposite track is electrically connected at only one end, rather than part of the circulating current loop.
With regard to insulated joints, for example, distinguishing insulated joints from broken rails may be accomplished by an extended signal absence in the primary test loop caused by the addition of a dead section loop. As is known in the art, railroad standards typically indicate the required stagger of insulated joints to be 32 in. to 56 in. In addition to the insulated joint providing a pseudo-break with an extended length, detection may be enhanced by identifying location specific signatures of signaling equipment connected to the insulated joints, such as batteries, track relays, electronic track circuitry, and the like. The location specific signatures of the signaling equipment may be received in the monitored electrical characteristics in response to the current circulating the newly-defined short loops 918, 920 (shown in
In the alternative embodiment described with reference to
In the alternative embodiment described with reference to
In the alternative embodiment described with reference to
At 1102, first and second examination signals are electrically injected into conductive tracks of the route being traveled by the vehicle system. The first examination signal may be injected using a first vehicle of the vehicle system. The second examination signal may be injected using the first vehicle at a rearward or frontward location of the first vehicle relative to where the first examination signal is injected. Optionally, the first examination signal may be injected using the first vehicle, and the second examination signal may be injected using a second vehicle in the vehicle system. Electrically injecting the first and second examination signals into the conductive tracks may include applying a designated direct current, a designated alternating current, and/or a designated radio frequency signal to at least one conductive track of the route. The first and second examination signals may be transmitted into different conductive tracks, such as opposing parallel tracks.
At 1104, one or more electrical characteristics of the route are monitored at first and second monitoring locations. The monitoring locations may be onboard the first vehicle in response to the first and second examination signals being injected into the conductive tracks. The first monitoring location may be positioned closer to the front of the first vehicle relative to the second monitoring location. Detection units may be located at the first and second monitoring locations. Electrical characteristics of the route may be monitored along one conductive track at the first monitoring location; the electrical characteristics of the route may be monitored along a different conductive track at the second monitoring location. Optionally, a notification may be communicated to the first and second monitoring locations when the first and second examination signals are injected into the route. Monitoring the electrical characteristics of the route may be performed responsive to receiving the notification.
At 1106, a determination is made as to whether one or more monitored electrical characteristics indicate receipt of both the first and second examination signals at both monitoring locations. For example, if both examination signals are monitored in the electrical characteristics at both monitoring locations, then both examination signals are circulating the conductive test loop 912 (shown in
At 1108, the vehicle continues to travel along the route. Flow of the method 1100 then proceeds back to 1102 where the first and second examination signals are once again injected into the conductive tracks, and the method 1100 repeats. The method 1100 may be repeated instantaneously upon proceeding to 1108, or there may be a wait period, such as 1 second, 2 seconds, or 5 seconds, before re-injecting the examination signals.
Referring back to 1106, if the electrical characteristics indicate that both examination signals are not received at both monitoring locations, then flow of the method 1100 proceeds to 1110. At 1110, a determination is made as to whether one or more monitored electrical characteristics indicate a presence of only the first or the second examination signal at the first monitoring location and a presence of only the other examination signal at the second monitoring location. For example, the electrical characteristics received at the first monitoring location may indicate a presence of only the first examination signal, and not the second examination signal. Likewise, the electrical characteristics received at the second monitoring location may indicate a presence of only the second examination signal, and not the first examination signal. As described herein, “indicat[ing] a presence of” an examination signal means that the received electrical characteristics include more than a mere threshold signal-to-noise ratio of the unique identifier indicative of the respective examination signal that is more than electrical noise.
This determination may be used to distinguish between electrical characteristics that indicate the section of the route is damaged and electrical characteristics that indicate the section of the route is not damaged but may have an electrical short. For example, since the first and second examination signals are not both received at each of the monitoring locations, the route may be identified as being potentially damaged due to a broken track that is causing an open circuit. However, an electrical short may also cause one or both monitoring locations to not receive both examination signals, potentially resulting in a false alarm. Therefore, this determination is made to distinguish an electrical short from an electrical break.
For example, if neither examination signal is received at either of the monitoring locations as the vehicle system traverses over the section of the route, the electrical characteristics may indicate that the section of the route is damaged (e.g., broken). Alternatively, the section may be not damaged but including an electrical short if the one or more electrical characteristics monitored at one of the monitoring locations indicate a presence of only one of the examination signals. This indication may be strengthened if the electrical characteristics monitored at the other monitoring location indicate a presence of only the other examination signal. Additionally, a non-damaged section of the route having an electrical short may also be indicated if an amplitude of the electrical characteristics monitored at the first monitoring location is an inverse derivative of an amplitude of the electrical characteristics monitored at the second monitoring location as the vehicle system traverses over the section of the route. If the monitored electrical characteristics indicate significant receipt of only one examination signal at the first monitoring location and only the other examination signal at the second monitoring location, then flow of the method 1100 proceeds to 1112.
At 1112, the section of the route is identified as being non-damaged but having an electrical short. In response, the notification of the identified section of the route including an electrical short may be communicated off-board and/or stored in a database onboard the vehicle system. The location of the electrical short may be determined more precisely by comparing a location of the vehicle over time to the inverse derivatives of the monitored amplitudes of the electrical characteristics monitored at the monitoring locations. For example, the electrical short may have been equidistant from the two monitoring locations when the inverse derivatives of the amplitude are monitored as being equal. Location information may be obtained from a location determining unit, such as a GPS device, located on or off-board the vehicle. After identifying the section as having an electrical short, the vehicle system continues to travel along the route at 1108.
Referring now back to 1100, if the monitored electrical characteristics do not indicate significant receipt of only one examination signal at the first monitoring location and only the other examination signal at the second monitoring location, then flow of the method 1100 proceeds to 1114. At 1114, the section of the route is identified as damaged. Since neither monitoring location receives electrical characteristics indicating at least one of the examination signals, it is likely that the vehicle is traversing over an electrical break in the route, which prevents most if not all of the conduction of the examination signals along the test loop. The damaged section of the route may be disposed between the designated axles of the first vehicle that define ends of the test loop based on the one or more electrical characteristics monitored at the first and second monitoring locations. After identifying the section of the route as being damaged, flow proceeds to 1116.
At 1116, responsive action is initiated in response to identifying that the section of the route is damaged. For example, the vehicle, such as through the control unit and/or identification unit, may be configured to automatically slow movement, automatically notify one or more other vehicle systems of the damaged section of the route, and/or automatically request inspection and/or repair of the damaged section of the route. A warning signal may be communicated to an off-board location that is configured to notify a recipient of the damaged section of the route. A repair signal to request repair of the damaged section of the route may be communicated off-board as well. The warning and/or repair signals may be communicated by at least one of the control unit or the identification unit located onboard the vehicle. Furthermore, the responsive action may include determining a location of the damaged section of the route by obtaining location information of the vehicle from a location determining unit during the time that the first and second examination signals are injected into the route. The calculated location of the electrical break in the route may be communicated to the off-board location as part of the warning and/or repair signal. Optionally, responsive actions, such as sending warning signals, repair signals, and/or changing operational settings of the vehicle, may be at least initiated manually by a vehicle operator onboard the vehicle or a dispatcher located at an off-board facility.
In one embodiment, one or more of the examination systems 102, 200, 500, 700, 800, and/or 900 may determine a location of one or more vehicles and/or which route of several different routes that the vehicle is traveling along based upon detection of a break in conductivity in a route. For example, the route may be formed from conductive segments joined together by insulated joints. The route examination system may detect the location of insulated joints in a manner similar to detecting damage and/or breaks in the route, as described above. For example, an insulated joint between two conductive segments of a rail may be detected in a manner similar to how a break in the rail is detected.
As the vehicles travel over the insulated joints in the route, the examination system can determine locations of insulated joints and/or switches, and compare the locations to known or designated locations of insulated joints and/or switches. For example, a route database may store known locations of insulated joints and/or switches in a route. The examination system can compare the detected locations of insulated joints and/or switches with the known or stored locations of the insulated joints and/or switches, and determine where the vehicle and/or vehicle system is located and/or which route is being traveled upon based on this comparison.
In the illustrated example, each rail 1202, 1204 is formed from plural conductive segments 1206 that are connected by insulated joints 1208. The insulated joints 1208 can represent dielectric, non-conductive material that interconnects adjacent or neighboring segments 1206. Additionally or alternatively, the insulated joints 1208 can represent a gap or separation between neighboring segments 1206. The insulated joints 1208 can prevent conduction of the electric examination signal described above between segments 1206.
The insulated joints 1208 may be separated from each other along the length of the rail 1202, 1204 and/or the route 1200 by a separation distance 1210. The separation distance 1210 may be a linear distance, a distance measured around a curve, a distance measured up an inclined grade, and/or a distance measured down a downhill grade. In one embodiment the separation distance 1210 is approximately 20 to 24 meters, but alternatively may be a shorter distance or a longer distance.
The geographic locations and/or the separation distances 1210 between insulated joints 1208 may be known or previously designated. For example, a route database or other memory may store designated locations of the insulated joints 1208 and/or switches between routes, and/or may store designated locations of separation distances 1210 between the insulated joints 1208 and/or the switches between the routes.
Determining locations of the insulated joints 1208, locations of switches between routes, and/or separation distances 1210 between insulated joints and/or switches may be useful in determining which route 1200 that a vehicle and/or vehicle system is currently traveling along and/or where the vehicle and/or vehicle system is located along the route 1200.
The characteristic 1300 may be similar to one or more of the signals 1012, 1014, 1016, 1018 shown in
As the examination system travels over the insulated joints 1208, the magnitude of the characteristic 1300 may change from the baseline value. As shown in
As shown in
Several insulated joints 1208 are shown in
The electrical characteristics 1300 shown in
With respect the electrical characteristics 1300 shown in
The changing portion 1502 can represent a decrease in the magnitude of the voltage, amperes, or the like, of the examination signal injected into the rail 1406C as the examination system travels over the switch 1408. Because the switch 1408 may include gaps, separations, or the like, between two or more of the rails 1404, passage of the vehicle and/or vehicle system with the examination system can result in the examination system detecting an open circuit or break in the conductivity of the route 1400, 1402 as the vehicle and/or vehicle system travels through or over the switch 1408.
The changing portion 1504 of the characteristics 1300 shown in
With respect to the electrical characteristics 1300 shown in
With respect to the electrical characteristics 1300 shown in
With respect to the electrical characteristics 1300 shown in
The examination system can monitor the electrical characteristics of the routes being traveled upon by the vehicle and/or the vehicle system in order to determine which route 1400, 1402 that the vehicle and/or vehicle system is traveling along subsequent to traveling over the switch 1408. For example, during travel of the vehicle and/or the vehicle system in the direction of travel 1410 along the route 1400, through the switch 1408, and continuing along the route 1400, the examination system may monitor electrical characteristics 1300 of the route in order to determine whether the vehicle and/or the vehicle system is on the route 1400 or the route 1402 subsequent to traveling through the switch 1408.
If the electrical characteristics 1300 monitored by the examination system include changing portions that occur in the same locations as the examination signals 1300 shown in
The examination system can refer to designated locations of insulated joints 1406 of the rails 1404 of the routes 1400, 1402 and/or designated locations of switches 1408 for several different routes in order to determine which route the vehicle and/or vehicle system is traveling along and/or where the vehicle and/or vehicle system is located along the route. For example, a route database disposed onboard and/or off-board the vehicle and/or vehicle system may store designated locations of insulated joints 1406 and/or designated locations of switches 1408 for many different routes. Responsive to identifying locations of insulated joints 1406 and/or switches 1408 based on the monitoring of the electrical characteristics 1300 during movement of the vehicle and/or vehicle system, the examination system can compare these identified locations to the designated locations of the insulated joints 1406 and/or the switches 1408 stored in the route database. Different sets of the designated locations of the insulated joints 1406 and/or the designated locations of the switches 1408 can be associated with different routes.
Depending on which set of the desert locations more closely match the locations identified by the examination system, examination system may select or identify a route that the vehicle and/or vehicle system is traveling along, and/or the location of the vehicle and/or vehicle system along the route. For example, if the locations of the changing portions in the electrical characteristic being monitored by the examination system more closely match the set of designated locations of the insulated joints 1406 and/or switches 1408 associated with a first route than one or more other routes, then the examination system may determine that the vehicle and/or vehicle system is traveling along the first route and not any of the one or more other routes.
With respect to the examples of the characteristics 1300 shown in
Optionally, the examination system can analyze variances in the separation distances between the changing portions in order to determine where the vehicle and/or vehicle system is located along the route. For example, the changing portions 1900, 1902 of the electrical characteristics 1300 shown in
The examination system can compare one or more of the separation distances 1908, 1910, 1912 and/or changes in one or more of the separation distances 1908, 1910, 1912 to determine which route the vehicle is traveling along and/or where the vehicle is located along the route. For example, designated separation distances between insulated joints 1406 and/or switches 1408 can be stored in the route database. The examination system can compare the separation distances 1908, 1910, and/or 1912 identified by the examination system from analysis of the electrical characteristics 1300 with the designated separation distances and/or variances in separation distances stored in the route database and associated with different routes. Based on this comparison, the examination system may determine that the identified separation distances more closely match the designated separation distances associated with one route or a location along a route. Based on this comparison, the examination system can determine which route the vehicle is traveling along and/or where the vehicle is located along the route.
The vehicle 2000 optionally can include an energy management system 2002 and/or a route database 2004. The route database 2004 can include or represent one or more memories, such as a computer hard drive, a flash drive, an optical drive, or other computer-readable storage medium. The route database 2004 may store different sets of designated locations of insulated joints and/or switches, designated separation distances between insulated joints and/or switches, designated changes in the separation distances, etc. As described above, these different sets of designated locations may be associated with different routes and/or different locations along the routes. The examination system may compare the identified locations of the changing portions in the electrical characteristics of a route during travel of the vehicle 2000 with a designated locations in order to determine which route the vehicle 2000 is traveling along and/or where the vehicle is located along the route.
The energy management system 2002 can include or represent hardware circuits or circuitry that include and/or are connected with one or more processors (e.g., one or more controllers, computer processors, or the low or other logic-based devices). The energy management system 2002 can create a trip plan that designates operational settings of the vehicle 2000 for a trip of the vehicle. The trip plan can designate operational settings as a function of time and/or distance along one or more routes. For example, the trip plan can designate throttle settings, brake settings, speeds, accelerations, horsepower, or the like, as a function of time and/or distance for a trip. Operational settings may be designated by the energy management system 2002 in order to reduce fuel consumed by the vehicle and/or vehicle system, emissions generated by the vehicle and/or vehicle system, or the like. As a result, the control unit 810 can automatically control actual operations of the vehicle 2000 and/or the vehicle system according to the designated operational settings of the trip plan in order to reduce fuel consumed and/or emissions generated relative to traveling along the same trip using different operational settings. Optionally, the energy management system 2002 and/or the control unit 810 may notify or coach an operator of the vehicle 2000 and/or vehicle system of the operational settings designated by the trip plan. The operator that may then manually implement these operational settings of the trip plan by manually controlling the vehicle or vehicle system.
At 2102, an examination signal is electrically injected into a route being traveled by a vehicle and/or vehicle system. As described above, this examination signal can be injected into the route to determine if the examination signal is successfully conducted along a closed loop formed at least in part by one or more conductive segments of the route.
At 2104, one or more electrical characteristics of the route are monitored responsive to injection of the examination signal into the route. The one or more electrical characteristics that are monitored can include, for example, voltage, amperes, conductivity, resistance, or the like, of the route. Depending on whether the route is damaged, includes insulated joints, and/or includes a switch, the electrical characteristics that are monitored may change. For example, a break in the route, an insulated joint, and/or a switch in the route can cause the voltage and/or amperes of the examination signal injected into the route to decrease or be eliminated. As another example, a break in the route, an insulated joint, and/or a switch in the route can cause the conductivity of the route to decrease or be eliminated, and/or can cause the resistance of the route to increase.
At 2106, a determination is made as to whether or not the one or more electrical characteristics being monitored indicate an open circuit or break in the conductivity of the route. If the one or more electrical characteristics being monitored change, such as by varying from a baseline value of the electrical characteristics by more than a designated threshold (e.g., changes by more than 1%, 3%, 5%, 10%, 20%, or the like), then the one or more electrical characteristics may indicate an open circuit or break in the conductivity of the route.
The baseline value of the electrical characteristics can be an average, median, moving average, moving median, or the like a previously monitored electrical characteristics. Optionally, the baseline value of the electrical characteristics can be based on or equivalent to the magnitude of similar electrical characteristics of the examination signal that is injected into the route. For example, the baseline value may be a voltage that is the same as the voltage of the examination signal, the baseline value may be an amount of and peers that the same as the amperes of the examination signal, or the like.
If the one or more electrical characteristics being monitored do indicate an open circuit or break in the conductivity of the route, then damage to the route, an insulated joint, and/or a switch may have been identified. As a result, flow of the method 2100 can continue to 2108. On the other hand, if the one or more electrical characteristics being monitored do not indicate an open circuit or break in the conductivity of the route, then flow of the method may return to 2102 for the injection of one or more additional examination signals into the route. Optionally, if the one or more electrical characteristics being monitored do not indicate an open circuit or break in the conductivity of the route, then flow of the method 2100 can return to 2104, so that one or more additional electric characteristics of the route may be monitored responsive to injection of a previous examination signal into the route.
At 2108, the location of where the open circuit or break in the conductivity the route was identified is determined. For example, the geographic location of the vehicle and/or vehicle system may be determined by one or more of the control units, communication units, or the like, described herein. The location of the vehicle and/or vehicle system when the open circuit or break in the conductivity of the route is detected may be identified as location of the open circuit or break in the conductivity of the route.
At 2110, an insulated joint in the route is identified as location where the open circuit or break in the conductivity of the route is identified. Optionally, a switch in the route is identified in the location where the open circuit or break in the conductivity of the route was identified. In one aspect, the open circuit or break in the conductivity the route may be identified as insulated joint or a switch depending on a distance and/or time period that the changing portion of the electrical characteristic extended. For example, an electrical characteristic may decrease or increase relative to baseline value over a longer distance and/or time during travel over a switch then during travel over an insulated joint. Depending on the size of the changing portion, the changing portion may be representative of a switch or an insulated joint.
At 2112 a determination is made as to whether locations of one or more insulated joints and or switches indicate which route is being traveled on by the vehicle and/or vehicle system, and/or where the vehicle and/or vehicle system is located along the route. For example locations of insulated joints and/or switches that were determined based on changes in the electrical characteristics of the route may be compared to different sets of designated locations of insulated joints and/or switches for different routes. Depending on which set of designated locations more closely matched identified locations of insulated joints and/or switches, a determination may be made as to which route is being traveled upon and/or where the vehicle and/or vehicle system is located along the route.
If locations of insulated joints and/or switches as identified based on examination of the one or more electrical characteristics of the route more closely match a first designated set of locations of the insulated joints and/or switches than one or more other designated sets, then the locations that were identified may indicate that the vehicle and/or vehicle system is traveling along the route associated with the first designated set. Optionally, if locations of insulated joints and/or switches as identified based on examination of the one or more electrical characteristics of the route more closely match a designated location along a route than one or more other locations along the route, the locations that were identified may indicate where the vehicle and/or vehicle system is located along the route. As a result, flow of the method 2100 can continue to 2114.
On the other hand, if the identified locations of the insulated joints and/or switches do not match one or more of the designated sets of insulated joints and/or switches, then the identify locations of the insulated joints and/or switches may not indicate which route as being traveled upon and/or where the vehicles located on the route. As a result flow of the method 2100 may return 22102. Optionally, flow of the method 2100 may return to 2104.
At 2114, the route associated with the designated set of locations of the insulated joints and/or switches joints and/or switches that more closely matches the identified locations of the insulated joints and 4/or switches may be identified as the route being traveled upon by the vehicle and/or vehicle system. Optionally, the location along the route that is associated with the designated set of locations of insulated joints and/or switches that more closely matches the identified locations of the insulated joints and/or switches may be identified as the location of the vehicle and/or vehicle system. The method 2100 may terminate or optionally may repeat one or more additional times during travel of the vehicle and/or vehicle system.
In one embodiment, a method (e.g., for examining a route) includes automatically detecting (with an identification unit onboard a vehicle having one or more processors) a location of a break in conductivity of a first route during movement of the vehicle along the first route and identifying (with the identification unit) one or more of a location of the vehicle on the first route or the first route from among several different routes based at least in part on the location of the break in the conductivity of the first route that is detected.
In one aspect, detecting the location of the break in the conductivity of the first route can include detecting the location of one or more insulated joints in one or more conductive rails of the first route.
In one aspect, detecting the location of the break in the conductivity of the first route can include detecting the location of one or more switches at one or more intersections between the first route and one or more second routes.
In one aspect, detecting the location of the break in the conductivity of the first route can include injecting an electric examination signal into a conductive segment of the first route and monitoring an electrical characteristic of the first route responsive to injecting the electric examination signal into the conductive segment of the first route.
In one aspect, identifying the one or more of the location of the vehicle or the first route from among the several different routes can include comparing the location of the break in the conductivity of the first route that is identified with a designated set of one or more locations of the break in the conductivity of the route.
In one aspect, identifying the one or more of the location of the vehicle or the first route from among the several different routes can include determining a separation distance between two or more of the breaks in the conductivity of the route that are detected.
In one aspect, identifying the one or more of the location of the vehicle or the first route from among the several different routes can include comparing the separation distance to one or more designated separation distances associated with one or more different locations or the several different routes.
In another aspect, the method further includes controlling (e.g., automatically controlling with a control unit having at least one processor) the vehicle for movement based at least in part on the identified location of the vehicle on the first route or the identified first route from among the several different routes.
In another embodiment, a system (e.g., a route examination system) includes an identification unit having one or more processors configured to detect a location of a break in conductivity of a first route from onboard a vehicle during movement of the vehicle along the first route. The identification unit also is configured to identify one or more of a location of the vehicle on the first route or the first route from among several different routes based at least in part on the location of the break in the conductivity of the first route that is detected.
In one aspect, the identification unit can be configured to detect the location of the break in the conductivity of the first route by detecting the location of one or more insulated joints in one or more conductive rails of the first route.
In one aspect, the identification unit can be configured to detect the location of the break in the conductivity of the first route by detecting the location of one or more switches at one or more intersections between the first route and one or more second routes.
In one aspect, the system also can include a control unit configured to inject an electric examination signal into a conductive segment of the first route and a detection unit configured to monitor an electrical characteristic of the first route responsive to injecting the electric examination signal into the conductive segment of the first route. The identification unit can be configured to detect the location of the break in conductivity of the first route based at least in part on the electrical characteristic.
In one aspect, the identification unit can be configured to identify the one or more of the location of the vehicle or the first route from among the several different routes by comparing the location of the break in the conductivity of the first route that is identified with a designated set of one or more locations of the break in the conductivity of the route.
In one aspect, the identification unit can be configured to identify the one or more of the location of the vehicle or the first route from among the several different routes by determining a separation distance between two or more of the breaks in the conductivity of the route that are detected.
In one aspect, the identification unit can be configured to identify the one or more of the location of the vehicle or the first route from among the several different routes by comparing the separation distance to one or more designated separation distances associated with one or more different locations or the several different routes.
In another embodiment, a system (e.g., a route examination system) includes a detection unit and an identification unit. The detection unit can be configured to be disposed onboard a vehicle system and to detect a change in an electrical characteristic of a first route being traveled upon by the vehicle system. The identification unit can be configured to be disposed onboard the vehicle system and to identify one or more of the first route from among several different routes or where the vehicle system is located along the first route based at least in part on the change in the electrical characteristic that is detected.
In one aspect, the detection unit can be configured to detect the change in the electrical characteristic as an opening in a circuit that is formed at least in part by the first route.
In one aspect, the identification unit can be configured to identify the change in the electrical characteristic of the first route as a location of an insulated joint in the first route.
In one aspect, the identification unit can be configured to identify the one or more of the first route or where the vehicle is located by comparing the location of the insulated joint with a designated location of one or more insulated joints stored in a route database.
In one aspect, the identification unit can be configured to identify the one or more of the first route or where the vehicle is located by comparing a separation distance between the location of the insulated joint and another location of another insulated joint with a designated separation distance between two or more insulated joints stored in a route database.
It is to be understood that the above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. For example, the above-described embodiments (and/or aspects thereof) may be used in combination with each other. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the inventive subject matter without departing from its scope. While the dimensions and types of materials described herein are intended to define the parameters of the inventive subject matter, they are by no means limiting and are exemplary embodiments. Many other embodiments will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. The scope of the inventive subject matter should, therefore, be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. In the appended claims, the terms “including” and “in which” are used as the plain-English equivalents of the respective terms “comprising” and “wherein.” Moreover, in the following claims, the terms “first,” “second,” and “third,” etc. are used merely as labels, and are not intended to impose numerical requirements on their objects. Further, the limitations of the following claims are not written in means-plus-function format and are not intended to be interpreted based on 35 U.S.C. §112(f), unless and until such claim limitations expressly use the phrase “means for” followed by a statement of function void of further structure.
This written description uses examples to disclose several embodiments of the inventive subject matter and also to enable a person of ordinary skill in the art to practice the embodiments of the inventive subject matter, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the inventive subject matter may include other examples that occur to those of ordinary skill in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.
The foregoing description of certain embodiments of the inventive subject matter will be better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. To the extent that the Figures illustrate diagrams of the functional blocks of various embodiments, the functional blocks are not necessarily indicative of the division between hardware circuitry. Thus, for example, one or more of the functional blocks (for example, processors or memories) may be implemented in a single piece of hardware (for example, a general purpose signal processor, microcontroller, random access memory, hard disk, and the like). Similarly, the programs may be stand-alone programs, may be incorporated as subroutines in an operating system, may be functions in an installed software package, and the like. The various embodiments are not limited to the arrangements and instrumentality shown in the drawings.
As used herein, an element or step recited in the singular and proceeded with the word “a” or “an” should be understood as not excluding plural of said elements or steps, unless such exclusion is explicitly stated. Furthermore, references to “an embodiment” or “one embodiment” of the inventive subject matter are not intended to be interpreted as excluding the existence of additional embodiments that also incorporate the recited features. Moreover, unless explicitly stated to the contrary, embodiments “comprising,” “including,” or “having” an element or a plurality of elements having a particular property may include additional such elements not having that property.
Since certain changes may be made in the above-described systems and methods without departing from the spirit and scope of the inventive subject matter herein involved, it is intended that all of the subject matter of the above description or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted merely as examples illustrating the inventive concept herein and shall not be construed as limiting the inventive subject matter.
This application is a continuation-in-part of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 14/527,246, filed 29 Oct. 2014 (the “'246 application”), which is a continuation-in-part of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 14/016,310, filed 3 Sep. 2013 (the “'310 application”), now U.S. Pat. No. 8,914,171 issued 16 Dec. 2014, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/729,188, filed 21 Nov. 2012 (the “'188 application”). The entire disclosures of the '188 application, the '310 application, and the '246 application are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2104601 | Young | Jan 1938 | A |
| 2104652 | Inman | Jan 1938 | A |
| 2111513 | Phinney | Mar 1938 | A |
| 2148005 | Allen et al. | Feb 1939 | A |
| 2233932 | Allen | Mar 1941 | A |
| 2289857 | Allen | Jul 1942 | A |
| 2293926 | Wallace | Aug 1942 | A |
| 2366802 | Pflasterer | Jan 1945 | A |
| 2601634 | Rivette | Jun 1952 | A |
| 2783369 | Weber | Feb 1957 | A |
| 2925552 | Cowan et al. | Feb 1960 | A |
| 2927711 | Naggiar | Mar 1960 | A |
| 3246141 | Ehrlich | Apr 1966 | A |
| 3508496 | Larson | Apr 1970 | A |
| 3519805 | Throne-Booth | Jul 1970 | A |
| 3537401 | Metzner | Nov 1970 | A |
| 3575596 | Schatzel | Apr 1971 | A |
| 3650216 | Harwick et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
| 3655962 | Koch | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3718040 | Freeman et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
| 3781139 | Lohse | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3791473 | Rosen | Feb 1974 | A |
| 3794833 | Blazek et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
| 3805056 | Birkin | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3813885 | Tabor | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3865042 | DePaola et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
| 3886870 | Pelabon | Jun 1975 | A |
| 3937432 | Birkin | Feb 1976 | A |
| 3948314 | Creswick et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
| 4003019 | Tronel | Jan 1977 | A |
| 4005838 | Grundy | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4041283 | Mosier | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4042810 | Mosher | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4062419 | Kadota | Dec 1977 | A |
| 4075632 | Baldwin et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4100795 | Panetti | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4117463 | Norton | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4136432 | Melley, Jr. | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4159088 | Cosley | Jun 1979 | A |
| 4181278 | Pascoe | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4181943 | Mercer, Sr. et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4214647 | Lutts | Jul 1980 | A |
| 4241403 | Schultz | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4253399 | Spigarelli | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4262209 | Berner | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4279395 | Boggio et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4324376 | Kuhn | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4344364 | Nickles et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4355582 | Germer | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4360873 | Wilde et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4361202 | Minovitch | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4401035 | Spigarelli et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4425097 | Owens | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4524745 | Tominari et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4548164 | Ylonen et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4561057 | Haley, Jr. et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4565548 | Davis et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4582280 | Nichols et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4582580 | Goudal et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4602335 | Perlmutter | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4644705 | Saccomani et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4663713 | Cornell et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4711418 | Aver, Jr. et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4718351 | Engle | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4735385 | Nickles et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4773590 | Dash et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4794548 | Lynch et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4827438 | Nickles et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4843575 | Crane | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4853883 | Nickles et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4932614 | Birkin | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4944474 | Jones | Jul 1990 | A |
| 5055835 | Sutton | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5109343 | Budway | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5129605 | Burns et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5133645 | Crowley et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5177684 | Harker et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5181541 | Bodenheimer | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5187945 | Dixon | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5197438 | Kumano et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5197627 | Disabato et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5201294 | Osuka | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5230613 | Hilsbos et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5240416 | Bennington | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5253153 | Mathews et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5261366 | Regueiro | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5277156 | Osuka et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5313924 | Regueiro | May 1994 | A |
| 5316174 | Schutz | May 1994 | A |
| 5357912 | Barnes et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5363787 | Konopasek et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5365902 | Hsu | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5388034 | Allen et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5394851 | Cryer et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5398186 | Nakhla | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5398894 | Pascoe | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5420883 | Swensen et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5433182 | Augustin et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5437422 | Newman | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5441027 | Buchanon et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5459666 | Casper et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5460013 | Thomsen | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5462244 | Van Der Hoek et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5487002 | Diller et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5487516 | Murata et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5492099 | Maddock | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5533695 | Heggestad et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5565874 | Rode | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5570284 | Roselli et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5574649 | Levy | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5574659 | Delvers et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5583769 | Saitoh | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5588716 | Stumpe | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5600558 | Mearek et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5605134 | Martin | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5618179 | Copperman et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5642827 | Madsen | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5651330 | Jewett | Jul 1997 | A |
| RE35590 | Bezos et al. | Aug 1997 | E |
| 5676059 | Alt | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5681015 | Kull | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5699986 | Welk | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5713540 | Gerszberg et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5720455 | Kull et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5735492 | Pace | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5738311 | Fernandez | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5740547 | Kull et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5755349 | Brundle | May 1998 | A |
| 5758299 | Sandborg et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5775228 | Lamba et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5785392 | Hart | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5803411 | Ackerman et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5813635 | Fernandez | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5817934 | Skantar | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5820226 | Hart | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5828979 | Polivka et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5832895 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5833325 | Hart | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5836529 | Gibbs | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5856802 | Ura et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5913170 | Wortham | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5927822 | Hart | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5928294 | Zelinkovsky | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5934764 | Dimsa et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5936517 | Yeh | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5944392 | Tachihata et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5950966 | Hungate et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5950967 | Montgomery | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5957571 | Koster et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5969643 | Curtis | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5978718 | Kull | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5983144 | Bonissone et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5986577 | Bezos | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5986579 | Halvorson | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5995737 | Bonissone et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5995881 | Kull | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5998915 | Scholz et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6005494 | Schramm | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6016791 | Thomas et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6067496 | Benoliel et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6067964 | Ruoff et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6081769 | Curtis | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6088635 | Cox et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6092021 | Ehlbeck et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6102009 | Nishiyama | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6112142 | Shockley et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6114901 | Singh et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6114974 | Halvorson | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6121924 | Meek et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6123111 | Nathan et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6125311 | Lo | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6128558 | Kernwein | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6129025 | Minakami et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6135396 | Whitfield et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6144901 | Nickles et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6158416 | Chen et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6158822 | Shirai et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6163089 | Kull | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6163755 | Peer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6179252 | Roop et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6192863 | Takase | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6195020 | Brodeur, Sr. et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6198993 | Higashi et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6216095 | Glista | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6216957 | Turunen, Jr. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6219595 | Nickles et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6225919 | Lumbis et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6230668 | Marsh et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6243694 | Bonissone et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6262573 | Wojnarowski et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6263265 | Fera | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6263266 | Hawthorne | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6269034 | Shibuya | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6270040 | Katzer | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6275165 | Bezos | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6286480 | Chen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6295816 | Gallagher et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6304801 | Doner | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6308117 | Ryland et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6317686 | Ran | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6322025 | Colbert et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6325050 | Gallagher et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6332106 | Hawthorne et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6349702 | Nishiyama | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6349706 | Hsu et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6357421 | Pritchard | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6360998 | Halvorson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6363331 | Kyrtsos | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6377215 | Halvorson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6380639 | Soucy | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6404129 | Hendricx et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6421606 | Asai et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6427114 | Olsson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6441570 | Grubba et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6443123 | Aoki et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6459964 | Vu et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6459965 | Polivka et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6484074 | Hazard et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6487478 | Azzaro et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6487488 | Peterson, Jr. et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6490523 | Doner | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6493627 | Gallagher et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6499815 | Daigle | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6501393 | Richards et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6505103 | Howell et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6520124 | Bohm, II | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6522958 | Dwyer et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6523787 | Braband | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6533223 | Ireland | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6549803 | Raghavan et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6557526 | Hoshino | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6564172 | Till | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6584953 | Yomogida | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6585085 | Kumar | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6591263 | Becker et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6591758 | Kumar | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6609049 | Kane et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6612245 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6612246 | Kumar | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6615118 | Kumar | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6615188 | Breen et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6631322 | Arthur et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6647328 | Walker | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6665609 | Franke et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6668217 | Franke et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6676089 | Katzer | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6691022 | Takemura et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6694231 | Rezk | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6698913 | Yamamoto | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6701064 | De Haan et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6712045 | Mccarthy, Jr. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6728606 | Kumar | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6728625 | Strubhar et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6732023 | Sugita et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6732032 | Banet et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6742392 | Gilmore et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6748303 | Hawthorne | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6748313 | Li et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6763291 | Houpt et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6782044 | Wright et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6789005 | Hawthorne | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6799096 | Franke et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6804621 | Pedanckar | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6810312 | Jammu et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6812888 | Drury et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6814050 | Kishibata et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6814060 | Solomons et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6823844 | Steinbrenner et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6853888 | Kane et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6853890 | Horst et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6854691 | Kraeling et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6863246 | Kane et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6865454 | Kane et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6893262 | Stockman | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6903658 | Kane et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6904110 | Trans et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6910792 | Takada et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6915191 | Kane et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6947830 | Froloff et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6948837 | Suzuki | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6953272 | Hayakawa et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6957131 | Kane et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6973947 | Penaloza et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6980894 | Gordon et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6996461 | Kane et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7031823 | Chatfield et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7047130 | Watanabe et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7051693 | Tetsuno et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7072757 | Adams et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7082924 | Ruedin | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7096171 | Hawthorne et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7131403 | Banga et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7140477 | Engle et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7161500 | Alfredsson et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7188009 | Hawthorne | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7200536 | Wynn | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7201350 | Sugita et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7219067 | Mcmullen et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7234449 | Casabianca et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7263647 | Bryant et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7290807 | Kumar | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7309929 | Donnelly et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7337766 | Nakayama et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7387029 | Cunningham | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7389694 | Hay et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
| 7395141 | Seck et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7416262 | Ring | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7497201 | Hollenbeck | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7509193 | Kustosch | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7523893 | Francis et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7543670 | Tamai et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7557748 | Zahm et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
| 7565867 | Donnelly et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7667611 | Lindsey et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7734387 | Young et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7770847 | Severson | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 7778747 | Hawkins et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7783397 | Peltz et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7811089 | Bond | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7895135 | Norris et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7960855 | King et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 8030871 | Young et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
| 8068975 | Jensen et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8126601 | Kapp et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8150568 | Gray | Apr 2012 | B1 |
| 8154227 | Young et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
| 8155811 | Noffsinger et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8157218 | Riley et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8160832 | Luo et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8195364 | Norris et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8264330 | Yeldell et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8266092 | Kuhn et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8305567 | Hesser et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8428798 | Kull | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8521345 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8532842 | Smith et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8626366 | Noffsinger et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8645047 | Daum et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8655518 | Cooper et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8655519 | Cooper et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8682514 | Falk et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8888052 | Baldwin et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 20010001131 | Miller | May 2001 | A1 |
| 20010019263 | Kwun | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010026321 | Goto | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010047241 | Khavakh et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020010531 | Hawthorne et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020059075 | Schick et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020062819 | Takahashi | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020065610 | Clark | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020065698 | Schick et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020072833 | Gray | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020096081 | Kraft | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020103585 | Biess et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020104779 | Connor et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107618 | Deguchi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020157901 | Kast et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020174653 | Uzkan | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188397 | Biess et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020195086 | Beck et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030000499 | Doelker et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030034423 | Hess, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030055666 | Roddy et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030060968 | MacPhail et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030076221 | Akiyama et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030091017 | Davenport et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030104899 | Keller | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030105561 | Nickles et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030107548 | Eun et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120400 | Ahmed Baig et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030139909 | Ozawa | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030158640 | Pillar et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030183729 | Root et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030187694 | Rowen | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030213875 | Hess, Jr. et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030214417 | Peltz et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030222981 | Kisak et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030229097 | Watkins et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030229446 | Boscamp et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233959 | Kumar | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030236598 | Villarreal Antelo et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040010432 | Matheson et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040024515 | Troupe et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040024518 | Boley et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040025849 | West et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040026574 | Seifert | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040034556 | Matheson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040038831 | Eadie | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040048620 | Nakahara et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040049339 | Kober et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040068359 | Neiss et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040073361 | Tzamaloukas et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040075280 | Kumar et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040098142 | Warren et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040107042 | Seick | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040108814 | Tsuda et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040129289 | Hafemann | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040129840 | Horst | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040133315 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040143374 | Horst et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153221 | Kumar | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167687 | Kornick et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040172175 | Julich et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040174121 | Tsuda et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040238693 | Cole | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040243664 | Horstemeyer | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040245410 | Kisak et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040249571 | Blesener et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050004723 | Duggan et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050007020 | Tsuda et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050045058 | Donnelly et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055157 | Scholl | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055287 | Schmidtberg et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050065674 | Houpt et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050065711 | Dahlgren et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050076716 | Turner | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050090978 | Bathory et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050096797 | Matsubara et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050099323 | Hirose | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050107954 | Nahla | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050109882 | Armbruster et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050120904 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050121005 | Edwards | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050121971 | Ring | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050171655 | Flynn et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050171657 | Kumar | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050186325 | Luangthep | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050188745 | Staphanos et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050189815 | Bryant | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050189886 | Donnelly et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050192720 | Christie et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050196737 | Mann | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050205719 | Hendrickson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050210304 | Hartung et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050229604 | Chen | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050251299 | Donnelly et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050253397 | Kumar et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050285552 | Grubba et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050288832 | Smith et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060005736 | Kumar | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060025903 | Kumar | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060030978 | Rajaram | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060047379 | Schullian et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060055175 | Grinblat | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060060345 | Flik et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060085103 | Smith, Jr. et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060085363 | Cheng et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060086546 | Hu et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060116789 | Subramanian et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060116795 | Abe et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060122737 | Tani et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060129289 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060138285 | Oleski et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060162973 | Harris et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060178800 | Chen et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060187086 | Quintos | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060212188 | Kickbusch et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060212189 | Kickbusch et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060219214 | Okude et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060225710 | Taglialatela-Scafati et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060231066 | Demura et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060235584 | Fregene et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060235604 | Taglialatela-Scafati et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060253233 | Metzger | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060271291 | Meyer | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060277906 | Burk et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060282199 | Daum et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070006831 | Leone et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070061053 | Zeitzew | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070062476 | Ota et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070073466 | Tamai et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070078026 | Holt et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070093148 | Gibbs et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070108308 | Keightley | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070112475 | Koebler et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070129852 | Chen et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070135988 | Kidston et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070137514 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070183039 | Irvin | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070203203 | Tao et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070209619 | Leone | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070219680 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070219681 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070219682 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070219683 | Daum et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070225878 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070233335 | Kumar et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070233364 | Kumar | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070241237 | Foy et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070250225 | Nickles et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070250255 | Matekunas et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070260367 | Wills et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070260369 | Philp et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070261648 | Reckels et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070274158 | Agam et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080004721 | Huff et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080010571 | Farnsworth et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080041267 | Denen et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080065282 | Daum et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080091334 | Carlson et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080105791 | Karg | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080109124 | Daum et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080110249 | Degeorge et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080125924 | Daum et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080128563 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080147256 | Liberatore | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080161984 | Hrdlicka et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080164078 | Rhodes et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080183345 | Chandra et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080183490 | Martin et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080201019 | Kumar et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080201028 | Brooks et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080201056 | Moriya | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080208393 | Schricker | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080312775 | Kumar | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090044530 | Gallagher et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090063045 | Figueroa et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090076664 | Mccabe et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090078236 | Gallagher et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090140574 | Gorman et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090159046 | Moriya | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090164104 | Wermuth et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090177345 | Severinsky et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090186325 | Kumar | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090187291 | Daum et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090193899 | Panetta | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090198391 | Kumar | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090205028 | Smeets et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090241909 | Smith | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090248220 | Ecton et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090254239 | Daum et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090266943 | Kumar et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090299555 | Houpt et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090319092 | Piche | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100023190 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100023240 | Haskara et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100049384 | Kraeling et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100049408 | Abadie et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100084916 | Kumar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100114404 | Donnelly | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100130124 | Teeter et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100131130 | Kalyanam et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100152998 | Schwarzmann | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100174427 | Sivasubramaniam et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100235022 | Siddappa et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100262321 | Daum et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100318247 | Kumar | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100332058 | Kane et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110029243 | Gallagher et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110035138 | Kickbusch et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110060486 | Meltser et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110093144 | Goodermuth et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110118899 | Brooks et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110257869 | Kumar et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110307113 | Kumar et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120022728 | Hall et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120108204 | Schell et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120108205 | Schell et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120108207 | Schell et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120135710 | Schell et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120197504 | Sujan et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120217351 | Chadwick et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120245766 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120245770 | Yamamoto et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120259531 | Daum et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120277940 | Kumar et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120290185 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120296545 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120316717 | Daum et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130015298 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130035811 | Schroeck et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130062474 | Baldwin et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130131898 | Kumar et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130131909 | Cooper et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130169037 | Bieg et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130171590 | Kumar | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130173083 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130261837 | Sharma et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130261856 | Sharma et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130284859 | Polivka | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130334373 | Malone, Jr. et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140094998 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140129154 | Cooper | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140138493 | Noffsinger et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140156123 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140207317 | Noffsinger et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140277824 | Kernwein | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140280899 | Brewster, Jr. et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20150009331 | Venkatraman | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150053827 | Noffsinger et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150183448 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2007202928 | Oct 2007 | AU |
| 2010256020 | Dec 2011 | AU |
| 1065039 | Oct 1979 | CA |
| 2192151 | Aug 1997 | CA |
| 2466540 | Nov 2004 | CA |
| 2627074 | May 2007 | CA |
| 642418 | Apr 1984 | CH |
| 1511744 | Jul 2004 | CN |
| 1528631 | Sep 2004 | CN |
| 1636814 | Jul 2005 | CN |
| 1683914 | Oct 2005 | CN |
| 1819942 | Aug 2006 | CN |
| 1906074 | Jan 2007 | CN |
| 1958363 | May 2007 | CN |
| 101351373 | Jan 2009 | CN |
| 101412377 | Apr 2009 | CN |
| 102556118 | Jun 2014 | CN |
| 1605862 | May 1971 | DE |
| 129761 | Feb 1978 | DE |
| 208324 | May 1984 | DE |
| 3538165 | Apr 1987 | DE |
| 255132 | Mar 1988 | DE |
| 4225800 | Nov 1993 | DE |
| 19645426 | May 1997 | DE |
| 19654960 | Jul 1998 | DE |
| 19731643 | Sep 1998 | DE |
| 19726542 | Nov 1998 | DE |
| 19830053 | Nov 1999 | DE |
| 19826764 | Dec 1999 | DE |
| 19935349 | Feb 2001 | DE |
| 19935352 | Feb 2001 | DE |
| 19935353 | Feb 2001 | DE |
| 10045921 | Mar 2002 | DE |
| 10226143 | Feb 2006 | DE |
| 102005051077 | Apr 2007 | DE |
| 202010006811 | Jul 2010 | DE |
| 102010026433 | Jan 2012 | DE |
| 102010045234 | Mar 2012 | DE |
| 88716 | Sep 1983 | EP |
| 114633 | Aug 1984 | EP |
| 341826 | Nov 1989 | EP |
| 445047 | Sep 1991 | EP |
| 467377 | Jan 1992 | EP |
| 485978 | May 1992 | EP |
| 539885 | May 1993 | EP |
| 554983 | Aug 1993 | EP |
| 594226 | Apr 1994 | EP |
| 644098 | Mar 1995 | EP |
| 719690 | Jul 1996 | EP |
| 755840 | Jan 1997 | EP |
| 958987 | Nov 1999 | EP |
| 1034984 | Sep 2000 | EP |
| 1143140 | Oct 2001 | EP |
| 1253059 | Oct 2002 | EP |
| 1293948 | Mar 2003 | EP |
| 1297982 | Apr 2003 | EP |
| 1348854 | Oct 2003 | EP |
| 1466803 | Oct 2004 | EP |
| 1562321 | Aug 2005 | EP |
| 1564395 | Aug 2005 | EP |
| 1566533 | Aug 2005 | EP |
| 1697196 | Sep 2006 | EP |
| 1754644 | Feb 2007 | EP |
| 1816332 | Aug 2007 | EP |
| 2129215 | Oct 1972 | FR |
| 2558806 | Aug 1985 | FR |
| 2767770 | Mar 1999 | FR |
| 482625 | Apr 1938 | GB |
| 1321053 | Jun 1973 | GB |
| 1321054 | Jun 1973 | GB |
| 2188464 | Sep 1987 | GB |
| 2371121 | Jul 2002 | GB |
| 2414816 | Dec 2005 | GB |
| 52121192 | Oct 1977 | JP |
| 63268405 | Nov 1988 | JP |
| 11002558 | Apr 1989 | JP |
| 3213459 | Sep 1991 | JP |
| 532733 | Feb 1993 | JP |
| 561347 | Mar 1993 | JP |
| 577734 | Mar 1993 | JP |
| 5238392 | Sep 1993 | JP |
| 5278615 | Oct 1993 | JP |
| 6028153 | Feb 1994 | JP |
| 6108869 | Apr 1994 | JP |
| 6153327 | May 1994 | JP |
| 7132832 | May 1995 | JP |
| 8198102 | Aug 1996 | JP |
| 976913 | Mar 1997 | JP |
| 9193804 | Jul 1997 | JP |
| 9200910 | Jul 1997 | JP |
| 10274075 | Oct 1998 | JP |
| 2858529 | Feb 1999 | JP |
| 2001065360 | Mar 2001 | JP |
| 2002204507 | Jul 2002 | JP |
| 2002-294609 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2002249049 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2003095109 | Apr 2003 | JP |
| 2004301080 | Oct 2004 | JP |
| 2004328993 | Nov 2004 | JP |
| 2005002802 | Jan 2005 | JP |
| 2006219051 | Aug 2006 | JP |
| 2006320139 | Nov 2006 | JP |
| 2006327551 | Dec 2006 | JP |
| 2008535871 | Sep 2008 | JP |
| 2009095094 | Apr 2009 | JP |
| 386 | Aug 2008 | KZ |
| 2115140 | Jul 1998 | RU |
| 2207279 | Jun 2003 | RU |
| 2213669 | Oct 2003 | RU |
| 2233011 | Jul 2004 | RU |
| 2237589 | Oct 2004 | RU |
| 2238860 | Oct 2004 | RU |
| 2238869 | Oct 2004 | RU |
| 2242392 | Dec 2004 | RU |
| 2265539 | Dec 2005 | RU |
| 2272731 | Mar 2006 | RU |
| 2273567 | Apr 2006 | RU |
| 2286279 | Oct 2006 | RU |
| 2299144 | May 2007 | RU |
| 2320498 | Mar 2008 | RU |
| 83221 | May 2009 | RU |
| 568241 | Dec 1981 | SU |
| 9003622 | Apr 1990 | WO |
| 9525053 | Sep 1995 | WO |
| 9606766 | Mar 1996 | WO |
| 9858829 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| 9914090 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| 9914093 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| 9960735 | Nov 1999 | WO |
| 0186139 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| 03097424 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| 2004023517 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| 2004039621 | May 2004 | WO |
| 2004051699 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| 2004051700 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| 2004052755 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| 2004059446 | Jul 2004 | WO |
| 2005028837 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| 2005061300 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| 2006049252 | May 2006 | WO |
| 2006133306 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| 2007027130 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| 2007091270 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| 2007111768 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| 2007116123 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| 2008065032 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| 2008073547 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| 2009092218 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| 2010039680 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| 2010139489 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| 2012041978 | Apr 2012 | WO |
| 2014193610 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| 200101708 | Aug 2001 | ZA |
| Entry |
|---|
| Turner, Steven; “Feasibility of Locomotive-Mounted Broken Rail Detection”, Final Report for High-Speed Rail IDEA Project 38; IDEA, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies; Jun. 2004. |
| Shanthini, M., et al.; “Electromagnetic System for Railroad Track Crack Detection”, British Journal of Science, vol. 4, Feb. 2012. |
| Dick, C., et al.; “Predicting the Occurrence of Broken Rails: A Quantitative Approach”, Abstract. |
| http://ridgetopgroup.actonsoftware.com/acton/rif/2522; Ridgetop Group Announces New Products for Rail Safety Improvements; May 18, 2015; Ridgetop Group Inc. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/527,246, filed Oct. 29, 2014, Joseph Forrest Noffsinger. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/729,188, filed Nov. 21, 2012, Jared Klineman Cooper. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,217, filed Apr. 6, 2015, Joseph Forrest Noffsinger. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/841,209, filed Aug. 31, 2015, Yuri Alexander Plotnikov. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/047,083, filed Feb. 18, 2016, Brett Alexander Matthews. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 62/161,626, filed May 14, 2015, Joseph Forrest Noffsinger. |
| Dick et al., “Multivariate Statistical Model for Predicting Occurrence and Location of Broken Rails”, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1825(1), pp. 48-55, 2003. |
| Hou et al., “A Rail Damage Detection and Measurement System Using Neural Networks”, Computational Intelligence for Measurement Systems and Applications, 2004. CIMSA, pp. 4-9, Jul. 14-16, 2004. |
| Brawner et al., “Magnetometer Sensor Feasibility for Railroad and Highway Equipment Detection”, Innovations Deserving Exploratory Analysis Programs, HSR IDEA Program Final Report; pp. 1-27, Jun. 24, 2006. |
| Chen et al., “Fault Detection and Diagnosis for Railway Track Circuits Using Neuro-Fuzzy Systems”, ScienceDirect Control Engineering Practice, pp. 585-596, May 2008. |
| Ho, T.K. et al., “Signature Analysis on Wheel-Rail Interaction for Rail Defect Detection”, Railway Condition Monitoring, 4th IET International Conference On, pp. 1-6, Jun. 2008. |
| Schafer II, D. H. “Effect of Train Length on Railroad Accidents and a Quantitative Analysis of Factors Affecting Broken Rails”, Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 2008. |
| Patra et al., “Availability Analysis of Railway Track Circuit”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, vol. 224 No. 3, pp. 169-177, May 1, 2010. |
| Kun-Peng et al., “Design of transmission system of real-time broken rail detection”, Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, Jan. 2013. |
| Zhang et al., “Train Detection by Magnetic Field Sensing”, Sensors and Materials, vol. 25, Issue No. 6, Feb. 4, pp. 423-436, 2013. |
| Maldonado et al., “Autonomous Broken Rail Detection Technology for Use on Revenue Service Trains”, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, Dec. 2014. |
| PCT Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with Related PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/053124 on Jul. 4, 2014. |
| PCT Invitation to Pay Additional Fees issued in connection with Related PCT/US2013/053124 on Apr. 2, 2014. |
| Unofficial English translation of Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related RU Application No. 2008110502 on Jul. 3, 2012. |
| Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/365,359 dated Jul. 16, 2012. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2009-540343 on Jul. 17, 2012. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2009-541431 dated on Aug. 14, 2012. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2008322623 dated on Aug. 15, 2012. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2009-540341 on Sep. 11, 2012. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 200980112545.9 on Sep. 11, 2012. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/052,816 dated Sep. 12, 2012. |
| Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/484,278 dated Sep. 20, 2012. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/556,334 dated Sep. 27, 2012. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2009-540342 on Oct. 2, 2012. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 11/608,066 dated Oct. 4, 2012. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 10/736,089 dated Oct. 5, 2012. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/669,364 dated Oct. 17, 2012. |
| Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/052,000 dated Oct. 24, 2012. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 200780001185.6 on Oct. 29, 2012. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201010584148.6 on Oct. 30, 2012. |
| Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/027,408 dated Oct. 31, 2012. |
| Unofficial English translation of Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related RU Application No. 2008125850 on Oct. 31, 2012. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/061,486 dated Nov. 2, 2012. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 13/529,783 dated Nov. 7, 2012. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201010584140.X on Nov. 21, 2012. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 12/484,278 dated Nov. 27, 2012. |
| Unofficial English translation of Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related RU Application No. 2008108985 on Dec. 4, 2012. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2007289022 dated Dec. 5, 2012. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2010260419 on Dec. 6, 2012. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,474 dated Dec. 11, 2012. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/573,141 dated Dec. 19, 2012. |
| Unofficial English translation of Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related RU Application No. 2007126476 on Dec. 21, 2012. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 200880108755.6 on Dec. 26, 2012. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/270,160 dated Dec. 31, 2012. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2009-530500 on Jan. 8, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2007294585 dated Jan. 8, 2013. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2009-540344 on Jan. 22, 2013. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related MX Application No. MX/a/2008/003359 dated on Jan. 30, 2013. |
| Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/061,444 dated Jan. 31, 2013. |
| International Invitation to Pay Additional Fees issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/044367 dated Feb. 1, 2013. |
| Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/052,816 dated Feb. 5, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2007294587 dated Feb. 7, 2013. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2007253963 on Mar. 12, 2011. |
| Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/622,136 dated Mar. 13, 2013. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 13/175,284 dated Mar. 18, 2013. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related MX Application No. MX/a/2012/007335 on Mar. 21, 2013. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2010292820 on Mar. 26, 2011. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2007289020 dated on Mar. 27, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/529,783 dated Mar. 29, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2009-541431 dated Apr. 2, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 12/556,334 dated Apr. 3, 2013. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 13/587,966 dated Apr. 5, 2013. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/044367 dated Apr. 9, 2013. |
| Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/831,492 dated Apr. 9, 2013. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/365,359 dated Apr. 11, 2013. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related IN Application No. 3115/DELNP/06 dated on Apr. 16, 2013. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2013202194 on Apr. 17, 2013. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/027,408 dated Apr. 23, 2013. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2009-540343 on Apr. 23, 2013. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 13/778,428 dated May 8, 2013. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2012-034736 on May 14, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 12/605,498 dated May 21, 2013. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,712 dated May 22, 2013. |
| Unofficial English translation of Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related RU Application No. 2008109249 on May 29, 2013. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 200780001338.7 dated on Jun. 5, 2013. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/385,354 dated Jun. 17, 2013. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2009-540342 on Jun. 25, 2013. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2009-540341 on Jul. 2, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/175,284 dated Jul. 8, 2013. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/061,444 dated Aug. 1, 2013. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/831,492 dated Aug. 6, 2013. |
| Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,474 dated Aug. 14, 2013. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 13/739,133 dated Aug. 28, 2013. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 13/488,652 dated Sep. 9, 2013. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/750,716 dated Sep. 10, 2013. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 13/344,331 dated Sep. 11, 2013. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/622,136 dated Sep. 12, 2013. |
| European Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related EP Application No. 11187313.9 dated Oct. 22, 2013. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2009225776 dated on Oct. 22, 2013. |
| European Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related EP Application No. 11187312.1 dated Oct. 23, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 11/831,492 dated Oct. 31, 2011. |
| Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/270,160 dated Oct. 31, 2013. |
| Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/385,354 dated Nov. 5, 2011. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2010260419 dated Nov. 25, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/739,133 dated Dec. 11, 2013. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 13/954,096 dated Dec. 24, 2013. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related EP Application No. 07716804.5 on Jan. 21, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/344,331 dated Jan. 23, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 12/365,359 dated Jan. 28, 2014. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/054300 dated Feb. 10, 2014. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 13/778,428 dated Feb. 25, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2007289020 dated Mar. 3, 2014. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 13/653,440 dated Mar. 19, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 11/622,136 dated Mar. 27, 2014. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 13/840,656 dated Apr. 16, 2014. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201210161080.X on Apr. 29, 2014. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,712 dated May 8, 2014. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201210258349.6 dated on May 23, 2014. |
| Knight, “10-4, Good Computer:Automated System Lets Trucks Convoy as One”, MIT Technology Review, May 28, 2014. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201080027403.5 on Jun. 13, 2014. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/053128 dated Jun. 23, 2014. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2012261786 dated on Jun. 26, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/545,271 dated Jun. 26, 2014. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/052,816 dated May 11, 2011. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related RU Application No. 2010115501 on May 26, 2011. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/061,462 dated Jun. 7, 2011. |
| Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/621,221 dated Jun. 22, 2011. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2007253963 dated on Jun. 29, 2011. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 200880116895.8 on Jul. 8, 2011. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2007294587 dated on Jul. 8, 2011. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related MX Application No. Mx/a/2008/003361 on Jul. 13, 2011. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/052,000 dated Jul. 14, 2011. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/047,427 dated Jul. 18, 2011. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/052,790 dated Aug. 1, 2011. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related RU Application No. 2008109009 on Aug. 23, 2011. |
| Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/385,354 dated Aug. 26, 2011. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/027,408 dated Sep. 13, 2011. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2007294585 dated on Sep. 19, 2011. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2007289021 dated on Sep. 22, 2011. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/045402 dated Sep. 26, 2011. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/270,160 dated Sep. 28, 2011. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2008302642 on Sep. 29, 2011. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related RU Application No. 2008125850 on Sep. 29, 2011. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/365,359 dated Oct. 6, 2011. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/128,249 dated Oct. 11, 2011. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2009-511134 on Oct. 25, 2011. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related RU Application No. 2008108985 on Oct. 26, 2011. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2007289022 dated on Oct. 26, 2011. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related RU Application No. 2008109249 on Oct. 27, 2011. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related RU Application No. 2008108972 on Oct. 28, 2011. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related MX Application No. 2007/010174 on Nov. 11, 2011. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2007333518 dated Nov. 14, 2011. |
| Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/061,486 dated Nov. 16, 2011. |
| Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/608,257 dated Dec. 2, 2011. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 200710306676.3 on Dec. 19, 2011. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 200980112545.9 dated on Dec. 29, 2011. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 12/047,427 dated Dec. 30, 2011. |
| Pan et al., “Full process control strategy of fuel based on water-coal ratio of ultra supercritical units”, Electronics, Communications and Control (ICECC), IEEE International Conference, Guangzhou, China, pp. 3750-3753, 2011. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards U.S. Appl. No. 12/126,858 dated Jan. 18, 2012. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related RU Application No. 2008124977 dated on Jan. 20, 2012. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/061,444 dated Jan. 31, 2012. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/622,136 dated Feb. 27, 2012. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 200980119041.X dated on Feb. 29, 2012. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2009-530500 on Apr. 3, 2012. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/061,486 dated Apr. 4, 2012. |
| Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/270,160 dated Apr. 4, 2012. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/484,278 dated Apr. 5, 2012. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2008302642 dated May 10, 2012. |
| Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/128,249 dated May 15, 2012. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related RU Application No. 2008108972 dated May 16, 2012. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 12/052,790 dated Jun. 13, 2012. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 12/126,858 dated Jun. 18, 2012. |
| Unofficial English translation of Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related RU Application No. 2008124977 on Jun. 22, 2012. |
| European Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related EP Application No. 16170151.1 dated Oct. 21, 2016. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,217 dated Oct. 24, 2016. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related IN Application No. 1184/CHENP/2008 dated on Oct. 27, 2016. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 14/457,304 dated Oct. 28, 2016. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related IN Application No. 1181/CHENP/2008 on Nov. 1, 2016. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related IN Application No. 1182/CHENP/2008 dated on Nov. 4, 2016. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201210356915.7 on Dec. 2, 2016. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2015207963 on Dec. 13, 2016. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2009-501417 dated Jul. 15, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/595,474 dated Aug. 5, 2014. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/573,141 dated Aug. 29, 2014. |
| Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 13/778,428 dated Sep. 9, 2014. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 13/618,970 dated Sep. 9, 2014. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 14/095,373 dated Sep. 16, 2014. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 13/565,571 dated Oct. 2, 2014. |
| Unofficial English translation of Notice of allowance issued in connection with related KZ Application No. 2013/1558.1 on Nov. 6, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/618,970 dated Nov. 19, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2010292820 dated Nov. 19, 2014. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 13/591,561 dated Feb. 13, 2015. |
| Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/573,141 dated Mar. 10, 2015. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 13/171,712 dated Mar. 10, 2015. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 14/489,126 dated Apr. 9, 2015. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/669,364 dated Apr. 23, 2015. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/653,440 dated Apr. 30, 2015. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2013206474 dated on May 6, 2015. |
| Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 13/591,561 dated Jun. 11, 2015. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2012-034736 dated on Jun. 16, 2015. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 14/491,339 dated Jun. 17, 2015. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 14/221,624 dated Jun. 19, 2015. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 14/489,126 dated Jun. 24, 2015. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 11/669,364 dated Sep. 17, 2015. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 13/939,326 dated Oct. 9, 2015. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related EP Application No. 11187312.1 on Oct. 15, 2015. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related EP Application No. 11187313.9 on Oct. 15, 2015. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 14/457,304 dated Oct. 22, 2015. |
| Sperry, “Sperry B-Scan Single Rail Walking Sticks”, Informational pamphlet, Oct. 26, 2015. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 14/696,124 dated Dec. 23, 2015. |
| Eurasia Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related EA Application No. 201591274 lated Jan. 21, 2016. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201380071077.1 on Feb. 6, 2016. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related IN Application No. 4662/DELNP/2007 dated on Feb. 29, 2016. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2015200168 on Mar. 2, 2016. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/591,561 dated Mar. 3, 2016. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related RU Application No. 2012124894 on Mar. 9, 2016. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201310220043.6 on Mar. 14, 2016. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201210356915.7 dated on Mar. 23, 2016. |
| Eurasia Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related EA Application No. 201591504 dated Apr. 6, 2016. |
| Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,217 dated Apr. 15, 2016. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2015205877 on Apr. 15, 2016. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 14/457,304 dated May 5, 2016. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 14/637,513 dated May 19, 2016. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related EP Application No. 08832181.5 on Jun. 14, 2016. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/021925 dated Jun. 23, 2016. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 14/933,659 dated Jun. 30, 2016. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2013216630 on Aug. 4, 2016. |
| Unofficial English translation of Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related RU Application No. 2012124894 on Aug. 5, 2016. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2013299945 on Aug. 8, 2016. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/031444 dated Aug. 24, 2016. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2013299501 on Oct. 7, 2016. |
| Ghanbari et al., “Artificial Neural Networks and regression approaches comparison for forecasting Iran's annual electricity load”, Power Engineering, Energy and Electrical Devices, Powering, pp. 675-679, Mar. 18-20, 2009. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 200480040639.7 on Apr. 17, 2009. |
| International Invitation to Pay Additional Fees issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/031740 dated Apr. 17, 2009. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/031740 dated Jun. 15, 2009. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related CA Application No. 2454739 dated on Jul. 20, 2009. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/045004 dated Aug. 13, 2009. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/032933 dated Nov. 3, 2009. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related MX Application No. 2007/010174 on Nov. 6, 2009. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related EP Application No. 07814412.8 on Dec. 3, 2009. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/622,136 dated Dec. 31, 2009. |
| Xin-Yu et al., “The Research on the Mechanism of Limiting Speed Pick-Up and Set-Out Train on Railway Transportation Capacity Loss”, Second International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation, Changsha, China, vol. No. 3, pp. 830-833, 2009. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/671,533 dated Mar. 2, 2010. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related EP Application No. 07716804.5 dated on Mar. 17, 2010. |
| International Invitation to Pay Additional Fees issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/037293 dated Mar. 18, 2010. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/052,782 dated Mar. 26, 2010. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/385,354 dated Apr. 19, 2010. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/037293 dated May 10, 2010. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related MX Application No. 2007/010174 on Jul. 9, 2010. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2007333518 on Aug. 9, 2010. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 200780001338.7 on Aug. 12, 2010. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/035058 dated Aug. 20, 2010. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 200780001327.9 on Aug. 26, 2010. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 10/736,089 dated Sep. 2, 2010. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/669,364 dated Sep. 23, 2010. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related MX Application No. 2008/003822 on Sep. 24, 2010. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 200780001166.3 on Sep. 30, 2010. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 200780001444.5 dated on Sep. 30, 2010. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 200780001185.6 dated on Oct. 27, 2010. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/621,221 dated Nov. 19, 2010. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/750,716 dated Dec. 17, 2010. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/385,354 dated Dec. 29, 2010. |
| Xiaogang et al., “The Research and Application of 1089 t/h Circulating Fluidized Bed Unit Coordinate Control System”, International Conference on E-Product E-Service and E-Entertainment (ICEEE), China, 2010. |
| Xun et al., “The analysis of GSM-R redundant network and reliability models on high-speed railway”, International conference on Electronics and Information Engineering (ICEIE), Beijing, China, vol. No. 2, pp. V2-154-V2-158, 2010. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/608,066 dated Jan. 19, 2011. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/048856 dated Feb. 8, 2011. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 11/671,533 dated Feb. 14, 2011. |
| International Invitation to Pay Additional Fees issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/047251 dated Mar. 4, 2011. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related MX Application No. 2008/003822 on Mar. 7, 2011. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related RU Application No. 2008110502 on Mar. 10, 2011. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/765,443 dated Mar. 16, 2011. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2007202928 dated on Mar. 29, 2011. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/061,486 dated Apr. 1, 2011. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related MX Application No. MX/a/2008/003365 on Apr. 7, 2011. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related RU Application No. 2008108972 on Apr. 8, 2011. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related RU Application No. 2007126476 on Apr. 11, 2011. |
| Office Action issued in connection with related MX Application No. 2008/0003821 dated on Apr. 18, 2011. |
| Unofficial English translation of Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 200780001345.7 on Apr. 20, 2011. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/047251 dated Apr. 26, 2011. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 12/045,633 dated Apr. 28, 2011. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/831,492 dated May 3, 2011. |
| Krevitt, “Remote Maintenance Techniques Proposed for the 200-BEV Accelerator”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. No. 14, Issue No. 3, pp. 997-1003, Jun. 1967. |
| Kiersztyn et al., “Evaluation of Locomotive Cable Insulation Life Under Varying Temperature Loading”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. No. IA-21, Issue No. 4, pp. 882-888, Jul./Aug. 1985. |
| Hoyt et al., “Assessing the effects of several variables on freight train fuel consumption and performance using a train performance simulator”, Transportation Research, vol. No. 24A, Issue No. 2, pp. 99-112, Jan. 1, 1990. |
| Hooper, “Reducing Rail Costs through Innovative Methods”, Railway Track and Structures, pp. 14-17, Jul. 1993. |
| Grizzle et al., “Improved Cylinder Air Charge Estimation for Transient Air Fuel Ratio Control”, Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Maryland, vol. No. 2, pp. 1568-1573, Jun. 29, 1994. |
| Grabs, “Konflikterkennung Und—Losung Fur Dispositive Aufgaben in Betriebszentralen”, vol. No. 87, Issue No. 7/08, pp. 254-258, Jul. 1, 1995. |
| Chiang et al., “Cycle Detection in Repair-Based Railway Scheduling System,” Robotics and Automation, IEEE International Conference on Minneapolis, New York, USA, vol. No. 3, pp. 2517-2522, Apr. 22, 1996. |
| Bonissone et al., “Genetic algorithms for automated tuning of fuzzy controllers: A transportation application”, Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Schenectady, NY, USA, vol. No. 1, pp. 674-680, 1996. |
| Cheng, “Hybrid Simulation for Resolving Resource Conflicts in Train Traffic Rescheduling”, Computers in Industry, vol. No. 35, Issue No. 3, pp. 233-246, Apr. 1, 1998. |
| Razouqi et al., Rynsord: A Novel, Decentralized Algorithm for Railway Networks with ‘Soft Reservation,’ VTC, 48th IEEE Ottawa, Canada, New York, USA, pp. 2585-2589, vol. No. 3, May 18-21, 1998. |
| Ehsani et al., “Application of electrically peaking hybrid (ELPH) propulsion system to a full-size passenger car with simulated design verification”, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. No. 48, Issue No. 6, pp. 1779-1787, Nov. 1999. |
| Cheng et al., “Algorithms on Optimal Driving Strategies for Train Control Problem”, Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, pp. 3523-3527, Jun. 28-Jul. 2, 2000. |
| He et al., “On-line Parameter Identification for Freight Train Systems”, Aug. 29, 2000. |
| Franke et al., “An algorithm for the optimal control of the driving of trains”, Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Sydney Australia, pp. 2123-2127, Dec. 2000. |
| Coleman, “A System for long haul Optimal Driver Advice”, Session 5b: Capacity Planning & Train Scheduling, pp. 5.61-5.69, 2003. |
| Doe, “21st Century Locomotive Technology-Quarterly Technical Status Report 6”, Report No. DOE-AL68284-TSR06, pp. 1-6, Apr. to Jun. 2004. |
| Bosch, “Technology explained: the Common Rail diesel injection system”, May 2004. |
| Salasoo, “Heavy vehicle systems optimization program: FY 2004 Annual Report” Section VIII.A. “21st Century Locomotive Technology” pp. 156-163 2004. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. US2004/020910 dated Dec. 2, 2004. |
| Doe, “21st Century Locomotive Technology, Quarterly Technical Status Report 11”, Report No. DOE-AL68284-TSR11, pp. 1-8, Jul. 2005 to Sep. 2005. |
| Chan et al., “Trip Optimizer System Description (Rev. 1.1)”, Trip Optimizer for Freight Trains Functional Description, pp. 1-24, Nov. 16, 2005. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 10/736,089 dated Feb. 13, 2006. |
| Ditmeyer, “Network Centric Railroading Utilizing Intelligent Railroad Systems”, World Bank Transport Forum Rail Transport for Development, pp. 1-21, Mar. 31, 2006. |
| King, “DOE heavy vehicle systems optimization (peer review): 21st Century Locomotive Technology”, pp. 20, Apr. 2006. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/385,354 dated May 23, 2007. |
| International Invitation to Pay Additional Fees issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/001428 dated Jun. 25, 2007. |
| International Invitation to Pay Additional Fees issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/066697 dated Sep. 21, 2007. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/066697 dated Dec. 3, 2007. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/032893 dated Feb. 20, 2008. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/001428 dated Feb. 25, 2008. |
| International Invitation to Pay Additional Fees issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/078001 dated Mar. 13, 2008. |
| International Invitation to Pay Additional Fees issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/078016 dated Mar. 20, 2008. |
| International Invitation to Pay Additional Fees issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/076699 dated Mar. 20, 2008. |
| International Invitation to Pay Additional Fees issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/078026 dated Apr. 8, 2008. |
| International Invitation to Pay Additional Fees issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/078340 dated Apr. 8, 2008. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/076699 dated Jun. 17, 2008. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/078001 dated Jun. 17, 2008. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/078016 dated Jun. 17, 2008. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/078340 dated Jun. 18, 2008. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/858,345 dated Jun. 20, 2008. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/078026 dated Jul. 7, 2008. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/063193 dated Aug. 21, 2008. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/001428 dated Sep. 12, 2008. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/078118 dated Oct. 7, 2008. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/858,345 dated Nov. 19, 2008. |
| Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 10/736,089 dated Dec. 12, 2008. |
| Unofficial English translation of Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related RU Application No. 2006125429 on Dec. 22, 2008. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/071958 dated Dec. 30, 2008. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/083526 dated Feb. 2, 2009. |
| Non-Final Rejection towards related U.S. Appl. No. 11/858,345 dated Mar. 6, 2009. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150183448 A1 | Jul 2015 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61729188 | Nov 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14527246 | Oct 2014 | US |
| Child | 14657233 | US | |
| Parent | 14016310 | Sep 2013 | US |
| Child | 14527246 | US |
